MY DEAR OLD FREDERIC,

Your note came to me to-day. I ought to have written to you long ago:

and indeed did half do a letter before the summer was half over: which

letter I mislaid. I shall be delighted indeed to have your photograph:

insufficient as a photograph is. You are one of the few men whose

portrait I would give a penny to have: and one day when you are in

England we must get it done by Laurence; half at your expense and half at

mine, I think. I wish you had sent over to me some of your poems which

you told me you were printing at Florence: and often I wish I was at

Florence to give you some of my self-satisfied advice on what you should

select. For though I do not pretend to write Poetry you know I have a

high notion of my judgment in it.

Well, I was at Boulge all the summer: came up thence five weeks ago:

stayed three weeks with my mother at Richmond; a week in London: and now

am come here to try and finish a money bargain with some lawyers which

you heard me beginning a year ago. They utterly failed in any part of

the transaction except bringing me in a large bill for service

unperformed. However, we are now upon another tack. . . .

In a week I go to London, where I hope to see Alfred. Oddly enough, I

had a note from him this very day on which I receive yours: he has, he

tells me, taken chambers in Lincoln's Inn Fields. Moxon told me he was

about to publish another edition of his Princess, with interludes added

between the parts: and also that he was about to print, but (I think) not

to publish, those Elegiacs on Hallam. I saw poor old Thackeray in

London: getting very slowly better of a bilious fever that had almost

killed him. Some one told me that he was gone or going to the Water

Doctor at Malvern. People in general thought Pendennis got dull as it

got on; and I confess I thought so too: he would do well to take the

opportunity of his illness to discontinue it altogether. He told me last

June he himself was tired of it: must not his readers naturally tire too?

Do you see Dickens' David Copperfield? It is very good, I think: more

carefully written than his later works. But the melodramatic parts, as

usual, bad. Carlyle says he is a showman whom one gives a shilling to

once a month to see his raree-show, and then sends him about his

business.

I have been obliged to turn Author on the very smallest scale. My old

friend Bernard Barton chose to die in the early part of this year. . . .

We have made a Book out of his Letters and Poems, and published it by

subscription . . . and I have been obliged to contribute a little dapper

{251} Memoir, as well as to select bits of Letters, bits of Poems, etc.

All that was wanted is accomplished: many people subscribed. Some of B.

B.'s letters are pleasant, I think, and when you come to England I will

give you this little book of incredibly small value. I have heard no

music but two concerts at Jullien's a fortnight ago; very dull, I

thought: no beautiful new Waltzes and Polkas which I love. It is a

strange thing to go to the Casinos and see the coarse whores and

apprentices in bespattered morning dresses, pea-jackets, and bonnets,

twirl round clumsily and indecently to the divine airs played in the

Gallery; 'the music yearning like a God in pain' indeed. I should like

to hear some of your Florentine Concerts; and I do wish you to believe

that I do constantly wish myself with you: that, if I ever went anywhere,

I would assuredly go to visit the Villa Gondi. I wish you to believe

this, which I know to be true, though I am probably further than ever

from accomplishing my desire. Farewell: I shall hope to find out your

Consul and your portrait in London: though you do not give me very good

directions where I am to find them. And I will let you know soon whether

I have found the portrait, and how I like it.

_To John Allen_.

BEDFORD, _Dec._ 13/49.

Letters of Edward FitzGerald, in Two Volumes. Vol. 1 · 第 191 / 252 题