MY DEAREST FELLOW,

Your letter reached me this morning and gave me much pleasure. An old

acquaintance is not the worse for its wear, I think. This very time ten

years ago we were in Wales together: I at Mr. Rees' boarding-house at

Tenby: and there I made chance acquaintance with the whiskered man {123}

at whose house I am now staying:--then a boy of sixteen. He is now a man

of business, of town-politics, and more intent on the first of September

than on anything else in the world. I see very little of him. . . .

I occasionally read sentences about the Virtues out of this collection of

Stobaeus, and look into Sartor Resartus, which has fine things in it: and

a little Dante and a little Shakespeare. But the great secret of all is

the not eating meat. To that the world must come, I am sure. Only it

makes one grasshopper foolish. I also receive letters from Morton and F.

Tennyson full of fine accounts of Italy, finer than any I ever read. They

came all of a sudden on Cicero's villa--one of them at least, the

Formian--with a mosaic pavement leading thro' lemon gardens down to the

sea, and a little fountain as old as the Augustan age bubbling up as

fresh, Tennyson says, 'as when its silver sounds mixed with the deep

voice of the orator as he sate there in the stillness of the noon day,

devoting the siesta-hours to study.' When I first read of these things I

wish to see them; but, on reflection, I am sure I see them much better in

such letters as these.

I have seen one good picture about here: a portrait of O. Cromwell by

Lely--so said--unlike other Lelys, but very carefully painted: and, I

should think, an original portrait. . . I also read Hayley's Life of

Romney the other day. Romney wanted but education and reading to make

him a very fine painter: but his ideal was not high nor fixed. How

touching is the close of his life! He married at nineteen, and, because

Sir Joshua and others had said that marriage spoilt an artist, almost

immediately left his wife in the North, and scarce saw her till the end

of his life: when, old, nearly mad, and quite desolate, he went back to

her, and she received him, and nursed him till he died. This quiet act

of hers is worth all Romney's pictures; even as a matter of Art, I am

sure.

Whether this letter will ever reach you, I don't know. I am going in two

days to Naseby for a little while, and shall then find my way home to

Suffolk for the greater part of the Winter and Spring, I suppose.

O beate Sesti,

Vitae summa brevis spem nos vetat inchoare longam.

I think of hiring a house in some country town like this, but nearer

Suffolk, and there have my books, etc. I want a house much: and a very

small one will content me, with a few old women close by to play cards

with at night. What a life, you will say!

His virtues walked then humble round,

Nor knew a pause, nor felt a void:

And sure the Eternal Master found

His single talent well employ'd.

That was not in playing picquet, I doubt. What fine lines of Johnson's

{125} these!

* * * * *

On the 15th of September 1842 FitzGerald first made Carlyle's personal

acquaintance. He always spoke of his having first gone to Chelsea in

company with Thackeray, and in the Notes which he left of his excavations

at Naseby he repeats what he frequently told myself and others. But his

memory was clearly at fault, for in a letter to Pollock, written on the

16th, but dated by mistake the 17th, of September, he says, 'I have come

up to London for two days on a false errand: and am therefore going back

in a pet, to Naseby. . . . I enquired at Spedding's rooms to-day: he is

expected by the 20th, which is near. Laurence is the only person I know

in town. . . . He and I went to see Carlyle at Chelsea yesterday. That

genius has been surveying the field of battle of Naseby in company with

Dr. Arnold, who died soon after, poor man! I doubt (from Carlyle's

description) if they identified the very ground of the carnage. . . . I

have heard nothing of Thackeray for these two months. He was to have

visited an Irish brother of mine: but he has not yet done so. I called

at Coram Street yesterday, and old John seemed to think he was yet in

Ireland.' With this correction I now give the Memorandum referred to,

which FitzGerald entrusted to my keeping together with several of

Carlyle's letters. An attempt to put up a monument on the real site of

the battle proved abortive, as will appear hereafter.

'About the middle of September 1842, W. M. Thackeray took me to tea

with Carlyle whom I had not previously known. He was then busy with

Cromwell; had just been, he told us, over the Field of Naseby in

company with Dr. Arnold of Rugby, and had sufficiently identified the

Ground of the Battle with the contemporaneous Accounts of it. As I

happened to know the Field well--the greater part of it then belonging

to my Family--I knew that Carlyle and Arnold had been mistaken--misled

in part by an Obelisk which my Father had set up as on the highest

Ground of the Field, but which they mistook for the centre-ground of

the Battle. This I told Carlyle, who was very reluctant to believe

that he and Arnold could have been deceived--that he could accept no

hearsay Tradition or Theory against the Evidence of his own Eyes, etc.

However, as I was just then going down to Naseby, I might enquire

further into the matter.

'On arriving at Naseby, I had spade and mattock taken to a hill near

half a mile across from the "Blockhead Obelisk," and pitted with

several hollows, overgrown with rank Vegetation, which Tradition had

always pointed to as the Graves of the Slain. One of these I had

opened; and there, sure enough, were the remains of Skeletons closely

packed together--chiefly teeth--but some remains of Shinbone, and

marks of Skull in the Clay. Some of these, together with some

sketches of the Place, I sent to Carlyle.

'The Naseby Monument, already advised by Carlyle, was not executed at

the time: and some how or other was not again talked of till 1855 when

the Estate was to be sold from us. I was told however by the Lawyers,

etc., that it was better not to interfere while that Business was

going on. So the Scheme went to sleep again till 1872, when, Carlyle

renewing the subject in some Letter, I applied to the Agent of the

Estate who was willing to help us in getting permission to erect the

Stone, and to a neighbouring Mason to fashion it as Carlyle desired.

We had some difficulty in this latter point, but at last all was

settled, when suddenly Agent and Lawyer informed us the thing must not

be done--for one reason, that Stone and Inscription were considered

too plain.'

Before the excavations were begun, however, FitzGerald received the

following letter of instructions from Carlyle, written three days after

their interview.

CHELSEA, 18 _Sept_., 1842.

Letters of Edward FitzGerald, in Two Volumes. Vol. 1 · 第 94 / 252 题