CHAPTER XX. SEX RELATION. [_Concluded._]

“Now,” said Mr. Midith, “may I ask you how _you_ prevent, or try to

prevent premature maternity? Do you prevent it by statute law? Public

opinion and the evil consequences attending premature maternity are all

the forces that you employ to prevent it. You have no penal laws that

punishes premature maternity, and if you had they would be powerless.

Our system of sex relation has all the advantage over yours on this

point then.

“We _teach_ our children all the sex relation we can, so that they may

learn the evil of its abuse. You seem to hide all sexual knowledge

from them. We endeavor to make the evil consequences a deterrent; you

endeavor to make ignorance the safeguard of their virtue. The knowledge

of a burn, and not the ignorance of it, deters a person from putting

his hand against a hot stove. We act on the assumption that a clear

knowledge of sexual abuse will likewise prevent that also. This is one

great point in our favor then. We trust in knowledge; you, in ignorance.

“But allow me to tell you that there are many more bad features in your

marriage system, besides those which I have already mentioned, not

only between the male and female, but between the parent and child

also. From historical knowledge and from the conduct of your present

savage, you know that petty tribes are very antagonistic and usually

at war with each other; that an individual of such a tribe, who is

confined to his limited tribal territory, has little, if any, lofty

humanitarian feelings for his fellowmen outside of his own tribe.

Your small families have much the same effect on an adult, and even

more so on children. The child is thrown in social contact only with

a few brothers and sisters, if it has any, and with a few of its very

nearest neighbors. This state of things gives a feeble opportunity

for the development of broad and deep social feelings, and a lack of

these feelings produces these petty antagonisms, strifes, negligence

and jealousies, of which there still exists so much on earth. A large

family, wide and close association and co-operation, aided by splendid

intercommunication, as we have them on Mars, unfold these higher

and nobler faculties of man, but especially of the child. Thus the

pettiness, engendered by man on earth, is, no doubt, largely due to

your jealous marriage system and your small families; these have, in my

opinion, also been the cause of your parental narrowness and jealousy;

for, as a rule, a parent here, from what I can see, finds as yet little

pleasure in helping to nurse and care for your helpless children,

unless they happen to be their parents.

“With natural and highly developed parental functions, a father loves

a child more as _a child_; a mother loves it more as _my_ child. Thus

a father, under freedom, finds more pleasure in and is best fitted for

providing for the _general_ wants of _children_; while the mother,

furnishing the nourishment for the infant, is best fitted to provide

the _particular_ wants of _her_ child. Under these conditions all

children, in all places, find fathers and mothers; and the pleasurable

feelings, resulting from the administration of parental cares, is, in

the case of man, the same as in the case of other organisms, ultimately

the only incentive which prompts a parent to act toward the offspring.

“Other evils are, many of your girls have to work out for little

or nothing, we may say. Their labor is often very toilsome and

disagreeable. The days are long. The landlady, and often the landlord

too, are abusive, cruel, and sometimes lustful. The social relations

with the family is often like a slave. The girl is often not permitted

to spend her few leisure minutes in the family parlor. She is, so to

speak, a social outcast. She belongs to a different caste. There is

a boss who looks upon her as an inferior creature wherever she goes.

Under such a cruel, disagreeable, social and industrial system, it is

no wonder that many of your ladies marry very young and become mothers

prematurely. It is very natural that an inexperienced girl, placed in

such deplorable conditions, will accept, in marriage, most any man that

comes along and at most any age, too. To be sure, the conditions, in an

average, are not better but even worse, when married than when single;

but the youth, in his love and under his social and industrial burden,

does not see that. One who is burdened and in slavery will try most any

scheme but the right one, to throw it off and be free.

“Again, look what a slave your traveling woman is. Perhaps she has

a baby or two and other necessaries to carry and care for, but a

gentleman is hardly safe to offer his services, because one can not

tell but what a jealous husband may come around the corner, who will

begin a suit against a person for alienating the affections of his

wife, or he may draw a revolver on you for being intimate, as he calls

it, with his wife and child. And the jealousy of your women is just the

same.

“Any man or woman, with us, may freely assist any woman, whether

traveling or not. Any one may carry her babe or parcel, if the lady is

satisfied. No particular man owns her, and therefore she is as free to

accept services from one man as from another.

“Notice how distant and unsociable your men and women are when

traveling, especially in railroad cars. Rarely do they speak to each

other. Instead of having a good, sociable time, they generally all sit

like mummies. The lady seems to fear the wrath of a jealous husband or

beau, and the gentleman of a jealous wife or sweetheart. Your travelers

act much like as if the Creator had decreed that sexual sociability

were an unpardonable offense and that it is dangerous and impure for a

strange lady and gentleman to converse together. They seem to assume

that all men are ravishers and all women are grown-up babies; and the

actual facts of your marriage system has, no doubt, to a great extent

established and confirmed this fear, which becomes very plain, I

think, when we remember that your primitive ancestors, perhaps, first

instituted your system of marriage by capturing their wife or wives.

“When the Marsites travel or walk or are at strange houses they are

just as sociable and talkative to strangers as to acquaintances. A

gentleman converses with a strange lady the same as he does with

an acquaintance, or as he would with another gentleman. We have no

formality outside of the individual. But we always make it a point to

act as pleasantly and sociably as if we had been living together for

years. Any two or more men or women, who may wish, may sit together

in the cars, may converse together, may assist each other, may go to

entertainments together, may walk or ride together, or may invite each

other. This is all left to suit the taste of the individual. He is the

supreme authority.

“Let us look at your married ladies when at a social gathering; we

will say at a common dance. The wife is very likely a mother, and has

perhaps an infant babe to care for. According to your present social

habits, the married man who is in the habit of taking his wife to a

dance is not unlikely to indulge in intoxicating liquor. He takes his

wife and child in one apartment, while he not infrequently goes to

another, where he perhaps indulges in smoking and drinking. It often

happens that he becomes more or less intoxicated, and sometimes even

gets very drunk. His wife during all this time is perhaps sitting in

the same place, on an old bench or chair, taking care of the baby. No

man hardly dares to converse with her, or ask her to take the baby a

while, so that she may dance if she wishes or otherwise amuse herself

by going about; for her husband, whom she has promised to obey, might

at any time come with a glass of wine for his wife, to which he

sometimes treats her, as he calls it. In this manner he ‘taffies’ her a

little. He often seemingly tries to make it appear that he is generous

and charitable; for, as a rule, you esteem _generosity_ and _charity_

far greater virtues than you esteem _justice_. It seems to me that

you are trying to raise your women on crumbs of _charity_, instead of

having them grow vigorous on _justice_. Charity, as a whole, is an

evil, for it tends to make a person more dependent; justice makes one

more self-reliant. Probably the husband, who brings his wife a glass

of wine under the pretense of generosity, spends more than half of her

money to buy his tobacco, cigars and whisky with. All the woman wants

is freedom and equal opportunity with the man. She should be free

and should receive all the ‘money’ she actually earns and handle it

herself. That is justice and nothing more. That is what justly belongs

to her, and if she does not get it she is unjustly robbed of it.

“Just think, the husband with his glass of wine often feels himself

insulted if he finds some man talking to his wife, and if he would find

some other man nursing the baby and still another man dancing with his

wife he often goes into a rage. _He_ does not keep his wife’s company

nor does he want other men to do it. If things do not just suit him, he

puts on his jealous pout, which sometimes lasts for a whole week and

sometimes even much longer.

“The wife is nearly always just as much of a jealous pout as the

husband and often much more so; but the woman is nearly always more

of a slave, because she is more confined with little children. Your

matrimony very often produces cold husbands, and no other man, even if

he would like to assist in caring for her child, is, as a rule, allowed

to do so. These are largely the conditions of your man and wife in

your marriage system. It is generally slavery all around. Of course, I

am well aware that some married men and women enjoy quite a degree of

individual freedom, but they are rather the exceptions than the rule.

“Again, let us suppose that two married couple would go on a pleasure

trip. They are riding on the cars. The husband and wife have perhaps

been together for years; they have told each other all the news they

know of. They have nothing new to talk about. But if any friend would

sit in the seat with my wife, and I would sit with his wife, we would

all have something new to talk about and pass the time pleasantly. But,

as a rule, men and women on earth are too jealous for that. Hence it is

that we often find a man and a woman sitting together in the same seat

in a car or elsewhere, the husband looking one direction and the wife

the opposite direction, not speaking to each other for hours at a time.

If you are an observer, you can see this in nearly every car in which

you may happen to be riding.”

“Does not the population of the human race, under sexual freedom

increase more rapidly than it does under our system of marriage?”

asked Viola, who seemed to have mentally stored away every word of Mr.

Midith’s narrative concerning their sexual relations.

“No; it is just the opposite, as Mr. Herbert Spencer in his biology has

so forcibly foreshadowed when he says: ‘The excess of fertility has

itself rendered the process of civilization inevitable; and the process

of civilization must inevitably diminish fertility and at last destroy

its excess.’ As a whole, the higher and the more complex the being, the

fewer the offspring. You see this is one point, but there are others

besides this one.

“Under your marriage system, in which the man largely runs the sexual

affairs, a wife often is the mother of from six to twelve children,

and not infrequently a number of them are unwelcome and would not have

been born if the mother had been free and independent in all directions.

“Our women, who are all perfectly free and independent in every sense

of the word, have now, in an average, between two and three children.

A Marsite lady is seldom a mother of more than three children. In this

manner a high state of civilization, mental culture and sexual freedom

have at last established an almost complete equilibrium between births

and deaths. Our population is now nearly stationary. A family or

community, in an average, increases or decreases very little, if any,

in population. Every child that is born has an abode ready to receive

it when born. It receives parental care, and it in turn gives parental

care when older, whether it be a parent or not. It, thereby, simply

pays during the age of youth and manhood for what it received during

its infancy. And every day that it labors it is paying for its abode.

“I have here endeavored to give you a brief and truthful explanation

and comparison of our sexual freedom and of your matrimony. I have

pointed out, as I see them, a few demerits and disadvantages of your

marriage for life, but I can see countless other faults too numerous,

in this brief narrative, even to mention. It is already growing

late, and I shall make only a few further suggestions without any

explanations, which I hope you will give some thought and consideration

when you are at leisure on some future occasion.

“Have you ever considered what causes your intense blind jealousy, and

how shallow and silly it is? Have you ever considered how many of your

husbands and wives poison or otherwise kill each other? Have you ever

considered what is the principal cause of your coarse, vulgar language

that can be heard most any place? Have you ever attempted to find the

cause for having so many ‘bad-tempered’ children that are continually

growing up and become your so-called mean men and women? You are all

well aware what an immense amount of trashy fiction, lustful love

stories are annually read, especially by your ladies; think for a

moment, if you can not find the cause for this. Do you not think that

sexual constraint, which causes an unsatisfied sexual novelty, gives

vent to sensual novel-reading? Have you ever considered how many

men and women live together as husband and wife, who scarcely ever

speak a kind, friendly word to each other? Have you ever considered

what a bad effect this has on the children who are reared under such

domestic influences? Have you ever endeavored to discover what causes

the diseased condition and feeble constitution of nearly all your

children at birth, or even during their pre-natal life? Have you ever

considered what causes the unsatisfied sexual novelty in both your

men and women? Have you ever considered how little care and attention

a married mother, who is crowded with other domestic burdens, can

bestow on her infant babe? Have you ever contemplated what a bad social

effect the idea of each parent caring for his own offspring _only_

has on society? Have you ever considered how little conditions can be

suited for the rearing of children in a society in which each married

couple live together in a little house either in a crowded city or in

a lonely country? Have you ever thought how much lying, deceit and

underhand work is practiced between many a husband and wife because of

their marital constraint? Have you ever thought how many men and women

are married for life who are entirely unsuited in temperament and in

disposition? Did you ever think how much pouting and ill-feeling, how

many quarrels and fights there are in married life all over your world.

I suppose you have noticed the continual increase of your divorces.

Have you noticed that divorces are most numerous in those vocations

in which women are most independent financially, such as actresses,

etc.? Do you know what that means? Have you ever thought how much

ill-feeling your sectarianism and partyism causes between husband and

wife? Have you ever thought how repugnant, burdensome, and fatal to

life and health it is for a woman to live a sexually intemperate life?

Your statistics show that your fallen women live their life of sin, in

an average, less than three years, so disagreeable is a life of sexual

intemperance to a woman; yet in wedlock, the man largely runs the

sexual affairs to suit his own perverted taste. Have you ever thought

how often a man or a woman when married have to do something that is

disagreeable to the one or to the other? One wants to go to church,

the other does not; one wants to go to a neighbor, the other does not;

one wants the child baptized, the other does not, etc. Have you ever

thought how much room and opportunity there is for aggressiveness when

two are indissolubly bound together for life? Have you ever thought

that your women have no public places to go to? Your men, who handle

the money, build saloons, club-rooms, etc., for themselves, but they

rarely ever invest a nickel in a public building for the women and

children. The church seems to be the only public place your women can

go to, and when they are there they have to be silent, so that they

can not exchange ideas with one another there. Have you ever thought

why you have so many more ladies in your churches than you have men?

Do you think this would be the case if women were free and independent

like our ladies are? I presume you have all noticed that your ladies

have a great desire for personal ornaments, for unique decorations, for

expensive, gaudy costumes, for elaborate hair dressing, face powder,

etc., and for a continuous change of fashion. These characteristics

are apparently much more strongly developed in your women than in your

men. In the lower animals, the male is almost invariable the gaudiest,

the most decorative. Why do you think there is an apparent exception

in _your_ human race? Remember, not in _ours_. In our world, the human

family is no more an exception to this rule like it once was and like

your human being is at present. Your exception to this rule, I think,

is easily accounted for. Let us see if we can find the _cause_.

“According to your courting and marriage custom, your suitor goes to

see his sweetheart _whenever_ he wishes and _wherever_ he wishes; but

your sweetheart is not permitted to seek her choice by going to see

_him_. She can only _attract_ her suitors principally by her personal

appearance, by her attire when she goes to church, to the theater,

on the street or when she looks out of the window and is gazed upon

by the passer-by, etc. She is not free to go and display her winsome

characteristics before the man she may love most, like the man does

before the woman he loves most. Hence she is at a great disadvantage

in showing her intrinsic worth, so she has to rely mainly on outward

appearance, and this outward appearance is often very deceptive, very

shallow, so that your men, who dictate to your women, are often caught

in their own traps. Your men, either consciously or unconsciously,

enslave your women by robbing them of their freedom; and by this act

of robbery the man indirectly enslaves himself. If your women, like

ours, were free in every sense of the word--free financially, socially,

industrially and sexually they would rely on the natural attractiveness

of a healthy, handsome face and body, on a graceful form and intrinsic

worth; instead of relying, as they now do, on gaudy outward attire,

twisted hair, small, uncomfortable shoes, tightly laced corsets, and

a long, trailing dress. All this display of unnatural costumes and

continuous change of fashion requires an immense amount of labor, which

has to be performed by the man as well as by the woman. In this manner,

by uncomfortable costumes, by sexual intemperance and by the burdens

of labor resulting from them, your men, as well as your women, enslave

themselves.

“You must not infer from what I have said that the Marsites do not

appreciate fine clothes; on the contrary, we are always richly dressed,

but comfort and cleanliness have great precedence over anything else.

Under the head of education, I will tell you more about our clothing

and our manner of dress.

“I am well aware that many of your people will believe that what I have

told you is a dangerous doctrine, that it is not in accord with an

orderly society and is detrimental to progress; but this false belief

of the masses is nothing new or nothing strange, as I have hinted at

before. In the first place, I have given you just what we already have

on Mars, an older planet than the earth is; and, in the second place,

the masses of mankind have always at first mistrusted and condemned

every measure of progress. A few illustrations will make this plain.

“During the last few centuries thousands of political enthusiasts have

been murdered, legally and otherwise, for proposing and advocating the

principles of a republican government, something like the present one

of the United States. The masses of the people a few centuries ago

believed that such a government would produce nothing but social and

civil chaos; but the masses of your contemporaries believe that it is

just _the_ government, and will do all they can to suppress all who

are now proposing a better one--one that will furnish more individual

freedom and equality, one that will mete out justice instead of charity.

“Your so-called freedom of speech and freedom of the press was severely

condemned by every government on earth only a few years ago. But to-day

you would fight for its preservation.

“Only a few years ago the masses of the Christian world believed that

the so-called separation of church and state would produce irreparable

social and spiritual degeneration, but on trial you find it much better

and more humane than the old practice of intolerance.

“Less than fifty years ago the vast majority of the people of the

United States believed that the United States could not prosper without

the institution of chattel slavery; but upon trial you found that it

is more prosperous now than it ever was before; that both the master

and the slave were benefited by abolishing it. So in all other cases

wherever we or you have granted a wider scope of individual freedom

and equality, we have at last found what we have been seeking for. So

you will, in the near future, find it to be with the sex relation. It

is one of the slaveries which must be abolished before social harmony

can reign. No non-invasive person can be _truly_ happy without being

_absolutely_ free. The individual must be the ultimate judge of his own

acts, likes and dislikes, and the testimony of history confirms the

fact that the more freedom the individual has been allowed or has asked

for, the better has been his conduct. The more he has been constrained,

the fiercer he has been. All aggressiveness must be banished from the

human mind before there can be complete social, industrial and sexual

harmony. Vice perishes under freedom and true virtue can not flourish

under slavery.”

“Those are all grand principles,” said Mr. Uwins as Mr. Midith had

finished. “They are perfectly clear to me now. I see through them from

beginning to end, and I have seen them more or less clearly for years,

but I have never been able to propose and outline a remedy for them;

but your social and industrial system does completely away with all our

present evils that I can see. You enjoy complete financial, social,

industrial, and sexual freedom. Of course the masses of our people are

not yet ripe for living such high and noble and pure lives. But I think

that we have to-day more than ten thousand of our foremost cultivated

and thoughtful men and women in the United States, that are able to

live nearly such high lives as your Marsites do, and we are all slowly

tending that way. Jealousy and aggressiveness gradually grow weaker

and weaker, and we gradually learn more and more that we can be truly

happy only by living in accord with the phenomena of the universe.”

A cityless and countryless world · 第 20 / 26 章