INTRODUCTION

In his collection of Scottish proverbs from literary texts

written before 1600 Bartlett Jere Whiting has laid a solid foundation

for the investigation of early Scottish proverbs and has

promised a survey of later collections. [1] The following

brief remarks are not intended to anticipate his survey but rather

to suggest the place of this particular collection in the historical

development and to point out the questions that it raises. Before

1600 men in Scotland had begun to make collections of proverbs. A

manuscript collection made by Archbishop James Beaton (1517-1603)

seems to have disappeared, but may survive in a form disguised

beyond all chance of recognition. Although editions of it published

in 1610, 1614, and "divers other Years" with "Mr. Fergusson's

Additions" have been reported, no copies of them have been found.

[2] "Mr. Fergusson" is no doubt David Fergusson (ca. 1525-1598),

whose _Scottish Proverbs_ was published at Edinburgh in 1641.

[3] This collection presumably includes the earlier gatherings

by Beaton and Fergusson, but is arranged in a rough alphabetical order

that makes it impossible to recognize its possible sources. According

to Beveridge, it contains 911 proverbs.[4] A new edition of

1659 and the subsequent editions down to and including that of 1716

announced themselves as _Nine hundred and fourty Scottish Proverbs_.

In the edition of 1667, according to Beveridge, "The proverbs are

numbered to 945; but no doubt there are omissions, as in ... 1692."

The edition of 1692 also runs to 945, "with 14 numbers omitted and

one number duplicated," making a total of 932, and in the edition of

1706 "a fifteenth number is omitted." [5] No information

about the editions of 1709 and 1716 is available. The edition of 1799

was reduced to 577 items.

Two manuscripts that were probably written in the first half of the

seventeenth century belong to the tradition represented by Fergusson's

collection but differ more or less widely from it in ways that

require further study. Beveridge, who prints one of these manuscripts

in its entirety, conjectures that it may "be a much extended version

founded upon a manuscript copy of [the edition of 1641], no doubt

made before the year 1598, when Fergusson's collection had presumably

been completed" (p. xvi). However this may be, it contains 1656

proverbs with repetitions and changes in alphabetization that make

it difficult to determine what has been added or perhaps omitted. In

preparing Beveridge's materials for publication, Bruce Dickins came

upon a second "roughly contemporary" manuscript containing an unspecified

number of proverbs (pp. 126-127). It contains some texts found in both

the first manuscript and the book of 1641 and some entirely new texts,

and agrees in one instance with the book against the manuscript and

in another with the manuscript against the book. Since only twelve

proverbs from this second manuscript are in print, any inferences about

relationships are risky.

The successful career of Fergusson's collection or the manuscripts

from which it was derived extended even farther than a share in the

collections already mentioned. In four collections which remain to

be discussed we can reckon with a close direct or indirect connection

with Fergusson's printed text. John Ray printed Fergusson's collection

in a partially anglicized form with minor changes and additions of

uncertain origin in _A Collection of English Proverbs_ (London,

1670). This book became, after several editions, the foundation of

the standard modern collections. Except for anglicization, "D" in Ray,

and Fergusson, 1641, agree exactly even to _tearm_ [term] in "Dead

and marriage make tearm-day." Variations not found in the edition of

1641 like _reply_ for _plie_ [plea] in "Na plie is best" and

_churn_ for _kirne_ in "Na man can seek his marrow in the kirne, sa weill

as hee that has been in it himself" suggest that Ray may have been

following a later edition than that of 1641. According to Beveridge

(p. xvi), Fergusson's collection also appears in _A Select Collection

of Scots Poems, Chiefly in the Broad Buchan Dialect_ (Edinburgh, 1777,

1785). The two editions are the same, except that that of 1777 has no

publisher's name and that of 1785 was issued by T. Ruddiman and Co. The

proverbs come at the end and are paged separately.

Finally, Fergusson's collection was the source of both this collection

bearing the mysterious name Pappity Stampoy and a derivative of it,

but again with some modifications. Since all the variations except

the Latin parallel texts that are, according to Beveridge (pp.

xxxvii-xxxix), characteristic of the edition of Fergusson published

in 1692 are present in Pappity Stampoy, these variations must have

been introduced into one or both of the editions of 1649 and 1659.

With such information as is at present available it is impossible to

determine whether Pappity Stampoy's rare additions were his own or

were also derived, as seems probable, from an edition of Fergusson.

Such proverbs as "Drunken wife gat ay the drunken penny" (Pappity Stampoy,

p. 17), "Eat and drink measurely, and defie the mediciners" (p. 18),

and "Put your hand into the creel, and you will get either an adder,

or an Eele" (p. 43) do not appear in the 1641 edition, but may be present

in a later one. In any event, _The Oxford Dictionary of English

Proverbs_ vouches for the currency of the last two proverbs in the

sixteenth century. Pappity Stampoy may have followed his source in

rejecting the "Proverbiale speeches" (Beveridge, pp. 46-50) or may

have discarded them on his own responsibility. As F. P. Wilson points

out, he showed ingenuity of a sort. "The thief jumbles the order of

the first 81 proverbs given in Fergusson under the letter A; then,

having put his reader off the scent, he gives the remaining proverbs

under this letter in Fergusson's order. Under another letter he may

give a run of proverbs in reverse order." [6]

Pappity Stampoy, who was scarcely an honorable man, soon got a Roland

for his Oliver. As Wilson says, the _Adagia Scotica or a Collection

of Scotch Proverbs and Proverbial Phrases, Collected by R. B. Very

Usefull and Delightfull_ (London: Nathaniel Brooke, 1668) "Turns

out to be a page-for-page reprint ... provided with a new title and

the initials of a new collector in order (is it unjust to say?) to

deceive customers."

Apart from its rarity, Pappity Stampoy's little book has both a curious

interest and a value of its own. Bibliographers have failed to decipher

the pseudonym, or to identify the printer. Some lucky chance may supply

the answers to these questions. The collection has some value to a

student of proverbs for a few scantily recorded texts that have

presumably been taken from the 1659 edition of Fergusson. Although they

do not appear in the old standard collections made by Bohn, Apperson,

and Hazlitt, Morris P. Tilley, who has used R. B.'s collection, has found

and pinned them down. More interesting and important than such details

about the recording of proverbs is the publication of Pappity Stampoy's

book in London. It is therefore an early instance of English interest in

Scottish proverbs. R. B.'s plagiarism of 1668 is in the same tradition,

and so also is John Bay's publication of Scottish proverbs in 1670. A

selection of 126 Scottish proverbs, which like the others appears to have

been derived from Fergusson, may be found in the anonymous _Select

Proverbs, Italian, Spanish, French, English, Scotish, British &c_.

(London, 1707), which is credited to John Mapletoft. It was reprinted

with a slight variation in title in 1710. F. P. Wilson notes an even better

example of English interest than these in "[James] Kelly's excellent

collection of 1721 [which] was published in London and was specially

designed for English readers."

A Collection of Scotch Proverbs · 第 11 / 51 题