PART I.--Do Varieties in Plants wear out, or tend to wear out?--The Question

DARWINIANA

ESSAYS AND REVIEWS PERTAINING

TO DARWINISM

BY

ASA GRAY

FISHER PROFESSOR OF NATURAL HISTORY (BOTANY) IN

HARVARD UNIVERSITY

NEW YORK:

1876.

CONTENTS

DARWINIANA

PREFACE

ARTICLE I

THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES BY

MEANS OF NATURAL SELECTION

Views and Definitions of Species--How Darwin's differs from that of Agassiz,

and from the Common View--Variation, its Causes unknown.--Darwin's

Genealogical Tree--Darwin and Agassiz agree in the Capital

Facts--Embryology--Physical Connection of Species compatible with

Intellectual Connection--How to prove Transmutation.--Known Extent of

Variation--Cause of Likeness unknown--Artificial

Selection.--Reversion--Interbreeding--Natural Selection.--Classification

tentative.--What Darwin assumes.--Argument stated.--How Natural Selection

works.--Where the Argument is weakest.--Objections--Morphology and

Teleology harmonized.--Theory not atheistical.--Conceivable Modes of

Relation of God to Nature

ARTICLE II

DESIGN VERSUS NECESSITY--

A DISCUSSION

How Design in Nature can be shown--Design not inconsistent with Indirect

Attainment

ARTICLE III

NATURAL SELECTION NOT INCONSISTENT

WITH NATURAL THEOLOGY

PART I.--Premonitions of Darwinism.--A Proper Subject for

Speculation.--Summary of Facts and Ideas suggestive of Hypotheses of

Derivation

Part II--Limitations of Theory conceded by Darwin.--What Darwinism

explains.--Geological Argument strong in the Tertiary Period.--

Correspondence between Rank and Geological Succession--Difficulties in

Classification.--Nature of Affinity.--No Absolute Distinction between

Vegetable and Animal Kingdoms.--Individuality.--Gradation

PART III.--Theories contrasted.--Early Arguments against

Darwinism.--Philosophical and Theological Objections--Theory may be

theistic.--Final Cause not excluded.--Cause of Variation unknown.--Three

Views of Efficient Cause compatible with Theism.--Agassiz's Objections of a

Philosophical Nature.--Minor Objections.--Conclusion

ARTICLE IV

SPECIES AS TO VARIATION,

GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION,

AND SUCCESSION

Alphonse De Candolle's Study of the Oak Genus.--Variability of the

Species.--Antiquity.--A Common Origin probable.--Dr. Falconer on the Common

Origin of Elephants--Variation and Natural Selection

distinguished.--Saporta on the Gradation between the Vegetable Forms of the

Cretaceous and the Tertiary.--Hypothesis of Derivation more likely to be

favored by Botanists than by Zoologists.--Views of Agassiz respecting the

Origin, Dispersion, Variation, Characteristics, and Successive Creation of

Species contrasted with those of De Candolle and others--Definition of

Species--Whether its Essence is in the Likeness

or in the Genealogical Connection of the Individuals composing a Species

ARTICLE V

SEQUOIA AND ITS HISTORY:

THE RELATIONS OF NORTH AMERICAN

TO NORTHEAST ASIAN AND TO

TERTIARY VEGETATION

Age and Size of Sequoia.--Isolation.--Decadence.--Related Genera.-- Former

Distribution.--Similarity between the Flora of Japan and that of the United

States, especially on the Atlantic Side.--Former Glaciation as explaining

the Present Dispersion of Species.--This confirmed by the Arctic Fossil

Flora of the Tertiary Period.--Tertiary Flora derived from the Preceding

Cretaceous.--Order and Adaptation in Organic Nature likened to a

Flow.--Order implies an Ordainer

ARTICLE VI

THE ATTITUDE OF WORKING

NATURALISTS TOWARD DARWINISM

General Tendency to Acceptance of the Derivative Hypothesis noted.--Lyell,

Owen, Alphonse De Candolle, Bentham, Flower, Ailman.-- Dr. Dawson's "Story

of the Earth and Man" examined.--Difference between Scientific Men and

General Speculators or Amateurs in the

Use of Hypotheses

ARTICLE VII

EVOLUTION AND THEOLOGY

Writings of Henslow, Hodges, and Le Conte examined.--Evolution and Design

compatible.--The Admission of a System of Nature, with Fixed Laws, concedes

in Principle all that the Doctrine of Evolution requires.--Hypotheses,

Probabilities, and Surmises, not to be decried by Theologians, who use

them, perhaps, more freely and loosely than Naturalists.--Theologians risk

too much in the Defense of Untenable Outposts

ARTICLE VIII

"WHAT IS DARWINISM?"

Dr. Hodges Book with this Title criticised.--He declares that Darwinism is

Atheism, yet its Founder a Theist.--Darwinism founded, however, upon

Orthodox Conceptions, and opposed, not to Theism, but only to Intervention

in Nature, while the Key-note of Dr. Hedge's System is Interference.--Views

and Writings of St. Clair, Winchell, and Kingsley adverted to

ARTICLE IX

CHARLES DARWIN:

SKETCH ACCOMPANYING A PORTRAIT IN "NATURE"

Darwin's Characteristics and Work as a Naturalist compared with those of

Robert Brown.--His Illustration of the Principle that "Nature abhors Close

Fertilization. "--His Impression upon Natural History exceeded only by

Linnaeus.--His Service in restoring Teleology to Natural History

ARTICLE X

INSECTIVOROUS PLANTS

Classification marks Distinctions where Nature exhibits Gradations.--

Recovery of Forgotten Knowledge and History of what was known of Dionzea,

Drosera, and Sarracenia.

ARTICLE XI

INSECTIVOROUS AND CLIMBING PLANTS

Review of Darwin's Two Works upon these Subjects--No Absolute Marks for

distinguishing between Vegetables and Animals.--New observations upon the

Sundews or Droseras.--Their Sensitiveness, Movements, Discernment of the

Presence and Appropriation of Animal Matter.--Dionaea, and other Plants of

the same Order.--Utricularia and Pinguicula.--Sarracenia and

Nepenthes.--Climbing Plants; the Climbing effected through Sensitiveness or

Response to External Impression and Automatic Movement.--Capacities

inherent in Plants generally, and apparently of no Service to them,

developed and utilized by those which climb.--Natural Selection not a

Complete Explanation

ARTICLE XII

DURATION AND ORIGINATION OF

RACE AND SPECIES

PART I.--Do Varieties in Plants wear out, or tend to wear out?--The Question

considered in the Light of Facts, and in that of the Darwinian

Theory.--Conclusion that Races sexually propagated need not die of Old

Age.--This Conclusion inferred from the Provisions and Arrangements in

Nature to secure Cross-Fertilization of Individuals.-- Reference to Mr.

Darwin's Development of this View

Darwiniana; Essays and Reviews Pertaining to Darwinism · 第 1 / 8 章