It is a remarkable phenomenon, that every kind of affection in any

degree strong, arising in the economy, alters immediately the motions

of the heart. The least wound, oftentimes the slightest pain are

sufficient to produce derangements in it; now these derangements are

of two kinds; sometimes its action is arrested for a moment; hence

syncopes, a mode of derangement which happens especially in violent

and sudden pains. The vulgar expression which is employed in these

cases, viz. "my heart is failing," is perfectly true. Sometimes, and

this is the most common case, this action is accelerated; hence the

febrile motions so frequent in all the local affections, motions purely

sympathetic and which cease when the affection disappears. In many

local inflammations, the evil is too circumscribed to admit an obstacle

to the course of the blood, an obstacle, which according to Boerhaave,

forces the heart to redouble its action to surmount it; besides when

there is no swelling, but only pain in the part, and the febrile motion

comes on, it is there clearly a sympathetic phenomenon. The increase of

the action of the heart may depend no doubt upon a foreign substance,

which, mixed with the blood, alters and renders it more irritating;

it may be owing to an affection of the substance of the organ which

disposes it to be more irritable; but it is certainly very often

sympathetic, and depends upon that unknown relation which connects all

our organs, upon that consensus which links together all their actions,

and places them in reciprocal dependance.

I shall say as much of the stomach; though its sympathetic reaction may

not be altogether as frequent as that of the heart, yet it becomes very

evident under many circumstances. Most local affections, especially

inflammations are accompanied with sympathetic vomitings. Various

fevers have in their commencement similar vomitings. It is in the

hospitals especially that we frequently observe these phenomena. Many

physicians have not considered these vomitings as merely sympathetic,

but as the index of a bilious affection, founded on this, that bile

is then almost always thrown up. But in all the animals that I have

opened, I have almost always seen the stomach when empty containing a

certain quantity of this fluid which had flowed back from the duodenum;

other authors have also made similar observations; so that it appears

that in the state of vacuity, the existence of bile in the stomach

is a natural phenomenon. Hence it is not astonishing, that in the

commencement of diseases, and even in their course, the stomach being

sympathetically excited and thus becoming the seat of vomiting, more or

less of this fluid should be thrown up. It would be brought up even in

health if vomiting is then excited by an emetic; this is what sometimes

happens in the morning when the stomach is empty, if any cause foreign

to an affection of the liver, as the sight of a disgusting object,

produces vomiting; the bile then comes out like every thing else that

is contained in the stomach. I do not say that oftentimes the liver

being sympathetically excited in the commencement of diseases, does

not furnish more bile, that this superabundant bile flowing into the

stomach, does not make this viscus contract; but certainly this is

not most commonly the case; we vomit bile as we discharge it by the

anus, because it is found in the stomach and intestines, and not

because it is superabundant. If vomiting was a natural function, the

bilious evacuations in this way would be as natural as the greenish

tinge of the excrements, which is always found in a state of health.

We see then, from this, that the bilious vomitings are, in many cases,

purely accessory, and that the essential phenomenon is the sympathetic

contraction of the stomach.

In the case of which I have just spoken there is no gastric difficulty;

the sympathetic alteration of the stomach only extends to the fleshy

fibres. But most frequently this gastric difficulty appears at the

beginning of diseases in which there is local affection; sand-like

substances are vomited up; it is because then the organ essentially

affected, the lungs for example, if it is in a peripneumony, has acted

sympathetically not only on the fleshy fibres, but also upon the mucous

membrane. This excited increases its secretion; hence these sand-like

substances, which are nothing but the mucous juices mixed with the

gastric fluid and with the bile; now the presence of these substances

is often sufficient to make the stomach contract, and produce vomiting

which expels them.

From this it is evident that there can be sympathetic vomitings without

gastric difficulty, and sympathetic gastric difficulty with a vomiting

immediately produced. In the first case the fleshy fibres feel the

sympathetic influence of the affected organ; in the second it is the

mucous membrane. But how, when the lungs, the pleura, the skin,

&c. being affected, does the stomach come into action? I have said

that the word sympathy was only a veil for our ignorance in respect

to the relations of the organs to each other. Vomitings produced by

erysipelas, phlegmon, pleurisy, peripneumony, &c. are then most often

an effect exactly analogous to the increase of the action of the heart,

which produces fever. They resemble the cerebral derangement from

which arises delirium, a derangement which is much more rare, &c. All

these phenomena indicate that the other organs feel by reaction the

state of that which is affected, &c. Physicians who have not viewed

all these phenomena in a great and general manner, have confined their

treatment to too narrow bounds. Much attention was formerly paid to the

sympathetic derangement of the heart, and bleeding was much practised

in the beginning of diseases; for some years past much regard has been

had to the sympathetic derangement of the stomach, and emetics are

frequently given; perhaps before long, more attention will be given to

the weights of the head, pains in that part, watchfulness, drowsiness,

&c. which are very common sympathetic symptoms, and the treatment will

be directed to the brain. In these varieties judicious physicians

will regard all these phenomena in a general manner; they will see in

all a proof of that general agreement which disposes together all the

functions, which connects all and thus connects their derangements;

they will see each organ rise up, as it were against the evil which

is introduced into the economy, and each react in its own way; they

will see these reactions producing effects wholly different, according

to the organ reacting, fever arising from the reaction of the heart,

delirium, drowsiness, watchfulness, convulsions, &c. from that of

the brain, vomiting from that of the stomach, diarrhœa from that of

the intestines, gastric and intestinal derangements, foulness of the

tongue from those of the mucous membranes, overflowings of bile from

that of the liver, &c. Thus in a machine in which the whole is united

and connected together, if one part is deranged all the others are so

also. We should laugh at the mechanist who attempted to mend but one

of these pieces, and neglected to repair the local derangement from

which all those arose which the machine exhibits. Let us not laugh at

the physician who attacks only a single symptom, without combating

the disease, of which he oftentimes knows not the principle, though

he knows that this principle exists; but let us laugh at him, if he

attaches to his treatment an importance which is nothing compared with

that of the disease.

The intestines next to the stomach are the most often sympathetically

affected in diseases. The bladder is the organic muscle that is the

last to feel the influences that go from the diseased organ; this

sometimes however happens. In fevers, we know that retentions of

urine from sympathetic and temporary paralysis, are not very rare;

incontinence of urine is less often seen.

_Character of the Vital Properties._

We see from what has been said, that the vital properties are very

active in the organic muscles, especially as it respects contractility.

These muscles are really during life, in constant action: they receive

with great ease the influence of other organs. Their vital properties

are altered with the greatest promptness, especially that which I have

just pointed out; for the insensible contractility is rarely altered in

them, because it does not perform an essential part. Observe in fact

that the morbid derangements of an organ affect always the predominant

vital force of that organ. Animal contractility is frequently

altered in the preceding system; in this it is the sensible organic

contractility. On the contrary, the insensible being very small,

the phenomena over which it presides remain always nearly the same;

nutrition is always uniform; lesions of the muscular texture are rare;

when they take place, it is rather by communication, as in cancers of

the stomach, in which the disease begins upon the mucous surface, and

in which the fleshy fibres are only consequently affected. The heart

and the womb are the muscles that are the most subject to these morbid

alterations; yet in the first they belong oftener to the internal

membrane than to the fleshy fibres themselves. On the contrary in the

systems in which the sensible organic contractility is incessantly in

action, as in the cutaneous, the serous, &c. in which it presides over

nutrition and exhalation; in the glandular, the mucous, &c. in which

it produces secretion and nutrition, it is this which is especially

altered. From these derangements arise alterations of texture, organic

diseases properly called, which are as common in these systems, as they

are rare in those in which the insensible contractility, is so very

obscure, as to be only at the degree necessary for nutrition.

It is to this that must be referred the infrequency of acute

inflammations of this system. As this affection is frequent in the

cutaneous, the serous, the mucous systems, &c. so this system, whose

functions require but little insensible organic contractility, presents

it rarely. Those who open many dead bodies know, that the texture of

the heart is hardly ever found inflamed. Nothing is more common than

phlegmasia of the external or serous membrane, and of the internal

or mucous membrane of the stomach, the intestines, &c.; but nothing

is more obscure and less frequently seen than that of their fleshy

tunic. In rheumatism, there is sometimes when the pains cease around

the joints, violent cholics, spasmodic vomitings even, indices perhaps

of an acute affection of the fibres of the stomach or intestines; but

we never find marks of these affections; we do not see the muscular

texture exhibiting the bright red of the inflamed mucous, cutaneous

and serous organs; or at least I have never observed it.

Physicians have not paid sufficient attention to the difference of

inflammations according to the difference of systems; but especially

they have not sufficiently observed that this difference accords

perfectly with that of the insensible organic contractility; that

where this vital force is most characterized, inflammations have the

greatest tendency to take place, because it is this which presides

over their formation; because these affections suppose its increase;

as convulsions suppose the increase of animal contractility, as

vomitings, accelerated pulsations of the heart, suppose that of organic

contractility, &c. I cannot repeat it too much, that the most frequent

diseases in each system, put always in action, raise or diminish the

predominant vital force in that system. It is a new pathological view,

that may be fruitful in results.

ARTICLE FOURTH.

PHENOMENA OF THE ACTION OF THE MUSCULAR SYSTEM OF ORGANIC LIFE.

These phenomena are, as in the preceding system, relative to the state

of contraction or to that of relaxation.

I. _Force of the Contractions._

It is never capable of being raised to the point which the force of

the muscles of animal life sometimes attains. Between the strongest

and the weakest pulse, between the feeble jet which precedes some

retentions of urine, and the jet of the most vigorous man, there is

much less difference than between the langour of the voluntary muscles

of some women and the power of those of a maniac, or a man in anger.

The heart and the deltoid muscle are nearly equal in respect to their

fleshy mass; now what would become of the circulation, if the first

sometimes sent the blood with the force which the second uses to raise

the superior extremity? A fit of anger, mania, &c. is sufficient to

produce aneurisms. On the other hand the organic muscles are not

affected with those prostrations of forces so common in the others;

paralysis is foreign to them, because they are not within the cerebral

influence. There is something which answers to convulsions; it is the

irregular agitations which produce so many varieties in the pulse

of acute fevers, agitations which must be distinguished from those

produced by an organic defect of the heart; but these agitations are

wholly different from spasms of the voluntary muscles; there is even no

analogy.

There is not in the force of the contraction of the muscles of which

we are treating, the waste which is so remarkable in that of the other

muscles; the effort is nearly proportionable to the acting cause, and

the distinction of this force into absolute and effective, cannot be

applied here; only there is required more or less contractile energy,

according as the body to be expelled from a hollow muscle, is solid or

fluid. Hence why the great intestines are provided with longitudinal

fibres more characterized than those of the small intestines; why the

rectum especially, in which the excrements have their greatest degree

of solidity, exhibits these fibres in a more evident manner than the

colon or the cæcum, though under a different form; why in diarrhœas the

weakest contraction is sufficient to evacuate the intestines, whilst

the sensible organic contractility of the rectum being insufficient to

void very solid excrements, it is necessary that the abdominal muscle

should aid the expulsion; why when a hard body is introduced into the

stomach, and the gastric juices do not soften it, it remains there a

long time before being expelled, and produces an inconvenient weight,

&c. &c. We know with what rapidity the passage of liquids takes place

from the stomach to the intestines, and how long on the contrary solid

aliments remain in the first.

The force of the organic muscles is incomparably greater in the

phenomena of life than in our experiments. Once laid bare, the heart

communicates only feeble motions, and most often irregular ones. There

is no proportion between the force necessary to produce the jet,

sometimes from seven to eight feet, which the blood exhibits coming

from the open carotid of a dog, and the force of the contractions which

the strongest stimuli produce when applied to the heart extracted from

the body. Nothing equals in our experiments the force of contraction

necessary for vomiting, &c. &c.

Numerous calculations have been made upon the force of contraction,

in the organic muscles as in the preceding, and there has been the

same variety of results. Can we in fact calculate the degrees of a

phenomenon which a thousand causes make vary every instant, not only in

different individuals, but even in the same, which sleep, digestion,

exercise, rest, tranquillity of mind, violence of the passions, day,

night, every thing in a word, incessantly modifies? I do not know that

we digest twice in exactly the same period, if the urine twice remains

the same length of time in the bladder before being discharged, if its

jet is twice exactly equal, &c.

The force of the organic muscles often remains in its ordinary degree,

or is even increased; whilst a general weakness possesses the others.

The force of the pulse, vomiting, diarrhœa, &c. coinciding with a

general prostration of the muscles of animal life, are not rare

phenomena in diseases.

II. _Quickness of the Contractions._

It varies singularly; very rapid in experiments, when death is recent

and the stimuli are very strong, the contractions are in general slower

in the natural state; we might say that it is in the inverse ratio of

the force; often at the instant we open the pericardium, the heart

moves with a rapidity which the eye can hardly follow, especially if we

inject an irritating fluid into this serous sac, a little before laying

the organ bare. The contractions increase much in quickness in certain

diseases; those of the heart, for example, then acquire in the adult

a rapidity often much greater than they have in the first age; this

rapidity is also in this case entirely distinct from the force of its

contractions; it is rare even that these two things are found united at

the highest point. In general when the force of the heart is increased,

there is a little more quickness; but there is very often a diminution

of force with an increase of quickness, or the force remains the same,

the quickness being much increased.

We have seen that the voluntary muscles have in general a degree of

quickness beyond which they cannot go, and that this quickness belongs

to the original constitution. Is not the same phenomenon observed

here? Often in two fevers whose symptoms are the same, whose degree of

intensity seems to be exactly uniform, the pulse is infinitely more

frequent in one individual than in the other. This does not always

denote a difference in the disease, but in the primitive constitution,

an aptitude of one of the two hearts to contract much quicker under the

same stimulant. Who does not know that in experiments, the contractile

rapidity is infinitely variable under the influence of the same causes?

Each organic muscle has its degree of quickness; the heart, the

stomach, the intestines, the bladder, &c. differ remarkably in this

respect.

III. _Duration of the Contractions._

The heart never remains in permanent contraction, as often happens in

the voluntary muscles. Though hunger seems to prove the contrary in the

stomach and the intestines, yet this phenomenon is not contradictory;

in fact, the permanent contraction of the empty gastric viscera is

the result of the contractility of texture. Whenever the sensible

organic contractility is in action, there is alternate contraction and

dilatation; this alternation even characterizes essentially this last

property, and distinguishes it from the animal contractility and from

that of texture, in which the state of contraction is often permanent.

IV. _State of the Muscle in Contraction._

All the phenomena described for the voluntary muscles, are almost

applicable to these, such as the hardening, increase in thickness,

diminution in length, expression of the blood, &c. &c. But there

are some differences between the heart and the gastric muscles, in

respect to the mode of contraction. In fact we see very sensibly in

the first, 1st, contractions of the whole analogous to those of the

voluntary muscles, contractions which take place in the state of

health, which produce the projection of the blood, and which are easily

made in experiments when the animals are still living; 2d, numerous

oscillations which seize upon the fibres, which agitate the whole of

them without producing any sensible effect, without contracting the

cavity, without projecting the blood for example. These oscillations

are observed at the instant of death, when the heart is ceasing to

be contractile; we may then irritate it in vain, there are no more

contractions of it as a whole; though there is a general and very

evident vibration of its fibres, yet its cavity is not contracted; the

blood stagnates in it. The heart perfectly resembles under this double

relation the voluntary muscles; it is agitated as we see these muscles

in the shuddering, that is called horripilatio, as we see it also in

certain sub-cutaneous muscles in some individuals. I have already, for

example, seen many persons affected with an habitual trembling of a

portion of the solæus, a trembling very evident to the eye through the

skin, and which had nothing in common with the contraction necessary to

the extension of the foot.

The involuntary muscles of the abdomen never exhibit this double mode

of contraction. Instead of the quick and sudden motions of the whole

of the muscle, we see but a slow contraction in it, often but slightly

apparent; it is a kind of creeping; there is not even to speak properly

a contraction of the whole, like that of the heart in which all the

fibres of an auricle or ventricle are moved at the same time; here each

fleshy surface appears to act successively. Placed at the origin of

the great vessels, the bladder and the stomach would be incapable of

communicating to the blood those motions by jerks, which the jet of an

artery exhibits at each contraction. On the other hand, at the instant

the motion ends in the stomach, the intestines and the bladder, we

never see in them those oscillations, those vibrations which are almost

constant in the heart and the voluntary muscles, and which we can even

create in them at will.

V. _Motions imparted by the Organic Muscles._

There are hardly ever simple motions in these muscles; the different

interlacing of their fleshy surface allows them to act almost always in

three or four different directions upon the substances they contain.

We can say nothing general upon those motions which compose the

diastole of the heart, the peristaltic motion of the alimentary canal,

the contraction of the bladder, &c. Each muscle has its mechanism

which belongs to the physiological history of the function to which it

contributes.

VI. _Phenomena of the Relaxation of the Organic Muscles._

In the relaxation of the organic muscles, phenomena in general take

place that are opposite to the preceding. It is then useless to

enumerate them; but there is a question here that should be examined,

that of knowing the nature of that state which succeeds contraction and

alternates with it.

In the muscles of animal life, when the contraction ceases, the muscle

does not in general go back itself to the state it was in antecedent

to the contraction, but it is drawn back to it by its antagonist; for

example, when the biceps is contracted to bend the fore-arm and its

contraction ceases, it becomes passive; the triceps putting itself

then in motion, extends it and draws it back to its natural position,

by acting at first on the bones which communicate the motion to this

muscle. Each muscular power of animal life finds then in that which

is opposed to it a cause of return to the state it had left in order

to contract. It is not so in organic life; its muscles, which are all

hollow, have no antagonists. We have considered as such to a certain

extent, the substances contained in the hollow muscles, substances

which oppose the effect of contraction; but incapable most commonly

of reacting after having been compressed, on account of their want of

elasticity, these substances cannot perform the same offices as real

antagonists.

Most physiologists have admitted as a cause of dilatation, the entrance

of new substances, which replace, in the muscular cavities, those

expelled by contraction; thus the entrance of new blood into the

heart, aliments into the different portions of the alimentary canal,

has been considered as proper to dilate these organs; so that according

to this opinion the muscles would be purely passive when they enlarged.

But the following considerations, many of which some authors, Grimaud

in particular, have already stated, do not permit us to consider in

this way the dilatation of the organic muscles, that of the heart in

particular.

General Anatomy, Applied to Physiology and Medicine, Vol. 3 (of 3) · 第 3 / 35 段