TO THE HON. H.S. CONWAY.

STRAWBERRY HILL, _Wednesday night, July_ 1, 1790.

It is certainly not from having anything to tell you, that I reply so

soon, but as the most agreeable thing I can do in my confinement. The

gout came into my heel the night before last, perhaps from the deluge

and damp. I increased it yesterday by limping about the house with a

party I had to breakfast. To-day I am lying on the settee, unable to

walk alone, or even to put on a slipper. However, as I am much easier

this evening, I trust it will go off.

I do not love disputes, and shall not argue with you about Bruce; but,

if you like him, you shall not choose an author for me. It is the most

absurd, obscure, and tiresome book I know. I shall admire if you have a

clear conception about most of the persons and matters in his work; but,

in fact, I do not believe you have. Pray, can you distinguish between

his _cock_ and _hen_ Heghes, and between all Yasouses and Ozoros? and do

you firmly believe that an old man and his son were sent for and put to

death, because the King had run into a thorn-bush, and was forced to

leave his clothes behind him! Is it your faith, that one of their

Abyssinian Majesties pleaded not being able to contribute towards

sending for a new Abuna, because he had spent all his money at Venice in

looking-glasses? And do you really think that Peter Paez was a

Jack-of-all-trades, and built palaces and convents without assistance,

and furnished them with his own hands? You, who are a little apt to

contest most assertions, must have strangely let out your credulity! I

could put forty questions to you as wonderful; and, for my part, could

as soon credit ----.

I am tired of railing at French barbarity and folly. They are more

puerile now serious, than when in the long paroxysm of gay levity.

Legislators, a senate, to neglect laws, in order to annihilate coats of

arms and liveries! to pull down a King, and set up an Emperor! They are

hastening to establish the tribunal of the praetorian guards; for the

sovereignty, it seems, is not to be hereditary. One view of their Fête

of the 14th,[1] I suppose, is to draw money to Paris; and the

consequence will be, that the deputies will return to the provinces

drunk with independence and self-importance, and will commit fifty times

more excesses, massacres, and devastations, than last year. George

Selwyn says, that _Monsieur_, the King's brother, is the only man of

rank from whom they cannot take a title.

[Footnote 1: The grand federation in the Champ de Mars, on the

anniversary of the taking of the Bastile.]

How franticly have the French acted, and how rationally the Americans!

But Franklin and Washington were great men. None have appeared yet in

France; and Necker has only returned to make a wretched figure! He is

become as insignificant as his King; his name is never mentioned, but

now and then as disapproving something that is done. Why then does he

stay? Does he wait to strike some great stroke, when everything is

demolished? His glory, which consisted in being Minister though a

Protestant, is vanished by the destruction of Popery; the honour of

which, I suppose, he will scarce assume to himself. I have vented my

budget, and now good night! I feel almost as if I could walk up to bed.

_THE PRINCE OF WALES--GROWTH OF LONDON AND OTHER TOWNS._

Letters of Horace Walpole — Volume II · 第 127 / 134 题