TO SIR HORACE MANN.

BERKELEY SQUARE, _Feb._ 12, 1789.

I now do believe that the King is coming to _him_self: not in the

language of the courtiers, to his senses--but from their proof, viz.,

that he is returned to his _what! what! what!_ which he used to prefix

to every sentence, and which is coming to his nonsense. I am

corroborated in this opinion by his having said much more sensible

things in his lunacy than he did when he was reckoned sane, which I do

not believe he has been for some years.

Well! now, how will this new change of scene operate? I fancy if any one

could win access to him, who would tell him the truth, he would be as

little pleased with his Queen, and his or her Pitt, as they will take

care he shall be with his sons. Would he admire the degradation of his

family in the person of all the Princes? or with the tripartite division

of Royalty between the Queen, the Prince, and Mr. Pitt, which I call a

_Trinity in disunity_? Will he be charmed with the Queen's admission to

power, which he never imparted to her? Will he like the discovery of his

vast private hoard? Will he be quite satisfied with the codicil to his

Will,[1] which she surreptitiously obtained from him in his frenzy _in

the first agony of her grief_? How will he digest that discovery of his

treasure, which will not diffuse great compassion when he shall next ask

a payment of his pretended debts? Before his madness he was indisposed

towards Pitt; will he be better pleased with him for his new dictatorial

presumption?

[Footnote 1: "_His will._" This refers to a scandal propagated by some

of the opposition newspapers, for which there was not the slightest

foundation.]

Turn to the next page--to Ireland. They have chosen for themselves, it

is believed, a Regent without restrictions,[1] in scorn of the

Parliament of England, and in order further to assert their

independence. Will they recede? especially when their courtiers have

flown in the face of our domineering Minister? I do not think they will.

They may receive the King again on his recovery; but they have united

interests with the Prince, and act in league with him, that he may

pledge himself to them more deeply in future at least; they will

never again acknowledge any superiority in our Parliament, but rather

act in contradistinction.

[Footnote 1: "_Regent without restrictions._" The King, in the autumn of

1788, having fallen into a state of temporary derangement, Pitt proposed

that the Parliament should appoint the Prince of Wales Regent, with some

temporary limitations in the exercise of the power. Fox and his

followers contended that the Prince, being of full age, was as

absolutely entitled to the Regency as his right, as he would have been

to the Crown in the event of his father's death; and Grattan, who had a

paramount influence over the Irish Parliament, adopting Fox's view,

carried an address to the Prince, entreating him to take upon himself

the Regency as his right--a view which, of course, was incompatible with

any power of limiting his authority. Fortunately, before this address

could be acted upon, the King recovered. The matter unfortunately caused

great divisions in the Royal Family, to which Walpole alludes in the

latter part of the letter; the Queen considering (not without grounds)

that the Prince had shown unfilial eagerness to grasp at power; and

indeed he had already made it known that he had intended to dismiss Pitt

and to appoint Fox Prime Minister.]

[Illustration: Hand-written Letter]

_Feb. 22nd._

The person who was to have brought you this was prevented leaving town,

and therefore I did not finish my letter; but I believe I shall have

another opportunity of sending, and therefore I will make it ready.

Much has happened this last week. The Prince is Regent of Ireland

without limitations--a great point for his character; for Europe will

now see that it was a faction which fettered him here, and not his

unpopularity, for then would not he have been as much distasted in

Ireland? Indeed, their own Attorney-General made way for him by opposing

on the most injudicious of all pleas, that it would be necessary before

he could be Regent there, to set the _Great Seal of England_ to the act!

How could the fool imagine, that when that phantom had been invented

here, it would not be equally easy for the Irish to invent a parallel

phantom of their own? But though this compliment is most grateful to the

Prince at present, he will probably find hereafter that he has in effect

lost Ireland, who meant more to emancipate themselves from this country

than to compliment the Prince or contradict the English ministerial

faction.

What will be the consequence of that rapid turn in Ireland, even

immediately, who can tell? for the King is called recovered, and the

English Regency is suspended, with fresh and grievous insults to the

Prince, who with the Duke of York are violently hindered by the Queen

from even seeing their father, though she and their sisters play at

cards with him in an evening; and that the Chancellor was with him for

an hour and three quarters on the 19th.

Under colour of what new phantom her Majesty, the Chancellor,[1] and

Pitt will assume the Government, we shall know in two or three days; for

I do not suppose they will produce the King instantly, at the risk of

oversetting his head again, though they seem half as mad as he, and

capable of any violent act to maintain themselves. And so much the

better: I do not wish them temperate; and it looks as if people never

were so in minorities and incapacities of their kings. The Prince set

out as indiscreetly as Pitt.

[Footnote 1: The Chancellor was Lord Thurlow, an able but unprincipled

man. Johnson expressed a high opinion of him as an arguer "who brought

his mind to bear upon yours." But Fox declared his very face "proved him

an impostor, since no man could be as wise as he looked."]

Of the event I am very glad; it saves the Prince and the Opposition from

the rashness of changing the Administration on so precarious and

shackled a tenure, and it saves them too from the expense of

re-elections. If the King recovers, they are but where they were, but

with the advantage of having the Prince and Duke of York rooted in

aversion to the Ministers, and most unlikely to be governed by the

Queen. If the King relapses, the Opposition stock will rise; though in

the mean time I do not doubt but the nation will grow drunk with the

loyalty of rejoicing, for kings grow popular by whatever way they lose

their heads. Still, whatever eccentricity he attempts, it will be

imputed to his deranged understanding. And, however even Lord

Hawkesbury[1] may meditate the darkest mischiefs under the new fund of

pity and loyalty, he will _not_ be for extending the prerogative, which

must devolve (on any accident to the King) on the Prince, Duke of York,

or some of the Princes, who will all be linked in a common cause with

their brothers, who have been so grossly affronted; and Prince William,

the third, particularly so by the last cause of hindering his peerage

while abroad. The King's recovery before the Regency Act was passed will

be another great advantage to the Prince; his hands would have been so

shackled, that he could not have found places for half the expectants,

who will now impute their disappointments to the King's amendment, and

not to the Prince.

[Footnote 1: Lord Hawkesbury was afterwards promoted to the Earldom of

Liverpool, and was the father of the sagacious, prudent, but resolute

minister under whose administration the French Revolutionary War was

brought to a conclusion by the final overthrow of Napoleon.]

_Monday, 24th._

The King has seen the Prince [of Wales], and received him kindly, but

the Queen was present. Iron Pluto (as Burke called the Chancellor) wept

again when with the King; but what is much more remarkable, his Majesty

has not asked for Pitt, and did abuse him constantly during his frenzy.

The Chancellor certainly did not put him in mind of Pitt, whom he

detests; so there is a pretty portion of hatred to be quaffed amongst

them! and swallowed, if they can; yet _aurum potabile_ will make it sit

on their stomachs.

_"THE ARABIAN NIGHTS"--THE AENEID--BOCCALINI--ORPHEUS AND EURYDICE._

Letters of Horace Walpole — Volume II · 第 124 / 134 题