TO MISS HANNAH MORE.[1]

[Footnote 1: Miss H. More was a remarkable woman. She was the daughter

of the village schoolmaster of Stapleton, near Bristol. But though she

had no higher education than he could give her, she soon began to show a

considerable literary talent. Her first compositions were dramas, one of

which, "Percy," Garrick accepted for the stage, where for a season it

had fair success. But she soon quitted that line for works of morality,

intended to promote the religious improvement of society in her day. The

most celebrated of them was "Coelebs in Search of a Wife." But some of

the tales which she published in "The Cheap Repository," a series of

stories for the common people, had a greater sale. One, "The Shepherd of

Salisbury Plain," was so popular that it is said that a million copies

of it were sold. Her talents led to her acquaintance being cultivated by

such men as Johnson, Reynolds, Burke, and Bishop Porteus; and her

exercise of them was so profitable, that though she gave large sums in

charity, she left a fortune of £30,000.]

STRAWBERRY HILL, _Oct._ 14, 1787.

My dear Madam,--I am shocked for human nature at the repeated

malevolence of this woman! [Mrs. Yearsley.] The rank soil of riches we

are accustomed to see overrun with seeds and thistles; but who could

expect that the kindest seeds sown on poverty and dire misfortunes

should meet with nothing but a rock at bottom? Catherine de' Medici,

suckled by hopes and transplanted to a throne, seems more excusable.

Thank heaven, Madam, for giving you so excellent a heart; ay, and so

good a head. You are not only benevolence itself, but, with fifty times

the genius of a Yearsley, you are void of vanity. How strange, that

vanity should expel gratitude! Does not the wretched woman owe her fame

to you, as well as her affluence? I can testify your labours for both.

Dame Yearsley reminds me of the Troubadours, those vagrants whom I used

to admire till I knew their history; and who used to pour out trumpery

verses, and flatter or abuse accordingly as they were housed and

clothed, or dismissed to the next parish. Yet you did not set this

person in the stocks, after procuring an annuity for her! I beg your

pardon for renewing so disgusting a subject, and will never mention it

again. You have better amusement; you love good works, a temper superior

to revenge.

I have again seen our poor friend in Clarges Street [Mrs. Vesey]: her

faculties decay rapidly, and of course she suffers less. She has not an

acquaintance in town; and yet told me the town was very full, and that

she had had a good deal of company. Her health is re-established, and we

must now be content that her mind is not restless. My pity now feels

most for Mrs. Hancock, whose patience is inexhaustible, though not

insensible.

Mrs. Piozzi, I hear, has two volumes of Dr. Johnson's Letters ready for

publication. Bruce is printing his travels, which I suppose will prove

that his narratives were fabulous, as he will scarce repeat them by the

press. These, and two more volumes of Mr. Gibbon's "History," are all

the literary news I know. France seems sunk indeed in all respects. What

stuff are their theatrical goods, their "Richards," "Ninas," and

"Tarares"! But when their "Figaro"[1] could run threescore nights, how

despicable must their taste be grown! I rejoice that their political

intrigues are not more creditable. I do not dislike the French from the

vulgar antipathy between neighbouring nations, but for their insolent

and unfounded airs of superiority. In arms, we have almost always

outshone them: and till they have excelled Newton, and come near to

Shakspeare, pre-eminence in genius must remain with us. I think they are

most entitled to triumph over the Italians; as, with the most meagre and

inharmonious of all languages, the French have made more of that poverty

in tragedy and eloquence, than the Italians have done with the language

the most capable of both. But I did not mean to send you a dissertation.

I hope it will not be long before you remove to Hampton.--Yet why should

I wish that? You will only be geographically nearer to London till

February. Cannot you, now and then, sleep at the Adelphi on a visit to

poor Vesey and your friends, and let one know if you do?

[Footnote 1: "Le Mariage de Figaro" was a play by a man who assumed the

name of Beaumarchais (as Poquelin had taken the name of Molière and

Arouet that of Voltaire); and the histories of both the author and the

play are curious. The author's real name was Caron, and he had been bred

a watchmaker. But he was ambitious; he gave up his trade, and bought a

place about the Court, which was among those which conferred gentility,

and which enabled him afterwards on one occasion to boast that he could

establish a better claim to the rank of noble than most of that body,

since he could produce a stamped receipt for it. He married two rich

widows. He next obtained the place of music-master on the harp to the

daughters of Louis XV., and conducted some of their concerts. He became

involved in a law-suit, which he conducted in person against some of the

most renowned advocates of the day, and gained great applause for the

talent he had exhibited in his pleadings. He crossed over to England,

where he made acquaintance with Wilkes and the agents of some of the

North American colonies, and became a volunteer agent for them himself

at the beginning of the American war, expending, according to his own

statement, 150,000 francs in the purchase of arms and stores, which he

sent out, when the President of Congress contented himself with thanking

him for his liberality, but refused to pay his bill. He resolved to try

his skill as a dramatist. His earlier plays were not particularly

successful, but in 1781 he produced "The Marriage of Figaro," a sort of

sequel to one of its predecessors, "The Barber of Seville." During the

progress of its composition he had shown some of the scenes to his

critical friends, who had pronounced it witty, and prophesied its

success. But it had also become known that it contained sarcasms on some

of the exclusive privileges of the nobles, and the officer who had

charge of such matters in consequence refused to license it for

performance, as a dangerous satire on the institutions of the country.

He had by this time made friends enough to form a party to remonstrate

against the hardship of the Censor's decision; till the King determined

to judge for himself, and caused Mme. Campau to read it to himself and

the Queen, when he fully agreed with the Censor, and expressed a

positive determination not to permit its performance. Unluckily he was

never firm in his resolutions; and Beaumarchais having secured the

patronage of Louis's brother, the Comte d'Artois, and Mme. de Polignac,

felt confident of carrying his point at last. His royal and noble

patrons arranged parties for private readings of the play. He then

declared, untruly, that he had altered all the passages which had been

deemed offensive, and Louis was weak enough to believe him without

further examination, and to sanction a private performance of it at the

country house of the Comte de Vandreuel. After this it was impossible to

exclude it from the theatre in Paris; and in April, 1784, it was acted

before an audience whom the long-continued contest had brought in

unprecedented numbers to hear it. If it had not been for the opposition

which had been made to it, it probably would never have attracted any

particular attention; for, though it was lively, and what managers call

a fair "acting play," it had no remarkable merit as a composition, and

depended for its attraction more on some of its surprises and

discoveries than on its wit. But its performance and the reception it

met with were regarded by a large political party as a triumph over the

Ministry; and French historical writers, to whatever party they belong,

agree in declaring that it had given a death-blow to many of the oldest

institutions of the country, and that Beaumarchais proved at once the

herald and the pioneer of the approaching Revolution. (See the Editor's

"Life of Marie Antoinette," c. 19.)]

_GENTLEMEN WRITERS--HIS OWN REASONS FOR WRITING WHEN

YOUNG--VOLTAIRE--"EVELINA"--MISS SEWARD--HAYLEY._

Letters of Horace Walpole — Volume II · 第 122 / 134 题