TO SIR HORACE MANN.

ARLINGTON STREET, _Feb._ 27, 1770.

It is very lucky, seeing how much of the tiger enters into the human

composition, that there should be a good dose of the monkey too. If

Aesop had not lived so many centuries before the introduction of

masquerades and operas, he would certainly have anticipated my

observation, and worked it up into a capital fable. As we still trade

upon the stock of the ancients, we seldom deal in any other manufacture;

and, though nature, after new combinations, lets forth new

characteristics, it is very rarely that they are added to the old fund;

else how could so striking a remark have escaped being made, as mine, on

the joint ingredients of tiger and monkey? In France the latter

predominates, in England the former; but, like Orozmades and

Arimanius,[1] they get the better by turns. The bankruptcy in France,

and the rigours of the new Comptroller-General, are half forgotten, in

the expectation of a new opera at the new theatre. Our civil war has

been lulled asleep by a Subscription Masquerade, for which the House of

Commons literally adjourned yesterday. Instead of Fairfaxes and

Cromwells, we have had a crowd of Henry the Eighths, Wolseys, Vandykes,

and Harlequins; and because Wilkes was not mask enough, we had a man

dressed like him, with a visor, in imitation of his squint, and a Cap of

Liberty on a pole. In short, sixteen or eighteen young lords have given

the town a Masquerade; and politics, for the last fortnight, were forced

to give way to habit-makers. The ball was last night at Soho; and, if

possible, was more magnificent than the King of Denmark's. The Bishops

opposed: he of London formally remonstrated to the King, who did not

approve it, but could not help him. The consequence was, that four

divine vessels belonging to the holy fathers, alias their wives, were at

this Masquerade. Monkey again! A fair widow,[2] who once bore my whole

name, and now bears half of it, was there, with one of those whom the

newspapers call _great personages_--he dressed like Edward the Fourth,

she like Elizabeth Woodville,[3] in grey and pearls, with a black veil.

Methinks it was not very difficult to find out the meaning of those

masks.

[Footnote 1: "_Orozmades and Arimanius._" In the Persian theology

Orozmades and Ahriman are the good and bad angels. In Scott's "Talisman"

the disguised Saracen (Saladin) invokes Ahriman as "the dark spirit." In

one of his earlier letters Walpole describes his friend Gray as

Orozmades.]

[Footnote 2: "_A fair widow._" Lady Waldegrave, a natural daughter of

Walpole's uncle, married the King's favourite brother, the Duke of

Gloucester, the _great personage_. The King was very indignant at the

_mésalliance_; and this marriage, with that of the King's other brother,

the Duke of Cumberland, to Mrs. Horton, led to the enactment of the

Royal Marriage Act.]

[Footnote 3: Elizabeth Woodville was the daughter of a Sir Richard

Woodville, and his wife, the Duchess of Bedford, the widow of the

illustrious brother of Henry V. Her first husband had been Sir John

Grey, a knight of the Lancastrian party; and, after his death, Edward

IV., attracted by her remarkable beauty, married her in 1464.]

As one of my ancient passions, formerly, was Masquerades, I had a large

trunk of dresses by me. I dressed out a thousand young Conways and

Cholmondeleys, and went with more pleasure to see them pleased than when

I formerly delighted in that diversion myself. It has cost me a great

headache, and I shall probably never go to another. A symptom appeared

of the change that has happened in the people.

The mob was beyond all belief: they held flambeaux to the windows of

every coach, and demanded to have the masks pulled off and put on at

their pleasure, but with extreme good-humour and civility. I was with my

Lady Hertford and two of her daughters, in their coach: the mob took me

for Lord Hertford, and huzzaed and blessed me! One fellow cried out,

"Are you for Wilkes?" another said, "D--n you, you fool, what has Wilkes

to do with a Masquerade?"

In good truth, that stock is fallen very low. The Court has recovered a

majority of seventy-five in the House of Commons; and the party has

succeeded so ill in the Lords, that my Lord Chatham has betaken himself

to the gout, and appears no more. What Wilkes may do at his enlargement

in April, I don't know, but his star is certainly much dimmed. The

distress of France, the injustice they have been induced to commit on

public credit, immense bankruptcies, and great bankers hanging and

drowning themselves, are comfortable objects in our prospect; for one

tiger is charmed if another tiger loses his tail.

There was a stroke of the monkey last night that will sound ill in the

ears of your neighbour the Pope. The heir-apparent of the House of

Norfolk, a drunken old mad fellow, was, though a Catholic, dressed like

a Cardinal: I hope he was scandalised at the wives of our Bishops.

So you agree with me, and don't think that the crusado from Russia will

recover the Holy Land! It is a pity; for, if the Turks kept it a little

longer, I doubt it will be the Holy Land no longer. When Rome totters,

poor Jerusalem! As to your Count Orloff's[1] denying the murder of the

late Czar, it is no more than every felon does at the Old Bailey. If I

could write like Shakspeare, I would make Peter's ghost perch on the

dome of Sancta Sophia, and, when the Russian fleet comes in sight, roar,

with a voice of thunder that should reach to Petersburg,

Let me sit heavy on thy soul to-morrow!

[Footnote 1: Count Orloff was one of the Czarina's earlier lovers, and

was universally understood to have been the principal agent in the

murder of her husband.]

We have had two or three simpletons return from Russia, charmed with the

murderess, believing her innocent, _because_ she spoke graciously to

_them_ in the drawing-room. I don't know what the present Grand

Signior's name is, Osman, or Mustapha, or what, but I am extremely on

his side against Catherine of Zerbst; and I never intend to ask him for

a farthing, nor write panegyrics on him for pay, like Voltaire and

Diderot; so you need not say a word to him of my good wishes. Benedict

XIV. deserved my friendship, but being a sound Protestant, one would

not, you know, make all Turk and Pagan and Infidel princes too familiar.

Adieu!

[Illustration: SIR ROBERT WALPOLE

_From a mezzotint by J. Simon after a picture by Sir Godfrey Kneller_]

_WILKES--BURKE'S PAMPHLET--PREDICTION OF AMERICAN

REPUBLICS--EXTRAVAGANCE IN ENGLAND._

Letters of Horace Walpole — Volume II · 第 73 / 134 题