TO SIR HORACE MANN.

STRAWBERRY HILL, _June_ 9, 1768.

To send you empty paragraphs when you expect and want news is

tantalising, is it not? Pray agree with me, and then you will allow that

I have acted very kindly in not writing till I had something to tell

you. _Something_, of course, means Wilkes, for everything is nothing

except the theme of the day. There has appeared a violent _North

Briton_, addressed to, and written against Lord Mansfield, threatening a

rebellion if he continued to persecute Mr. Wilkes. This paper, they say,

Wilkes owned to the Chevalier de Chastelux, a French gentleman, who went

to see him in the King's Bench, and who knew him at Paris. A rebellion

threatened in print is not very terrible. However, it was said that the

paper was outrageous enough to furnish the Law with every handle it

could want. But modern mountains do not degenerate from their ancestors;

their issue are still mice. You know, too, that this agrees with my

system, that this is an age of abortions. Prosecutions were ordered

against the publishers and vendors, and there, I suppose, it will end.

Yesterday was fixed for the appearance of Wilkes in Westminster Hall.

The Judges went down by nine in the morning, but the mob had done

breakfast still sooner, and was there before them; and as Judges stuffed

out with dignity and lamb-skins are not absolute sprites, they had much

ado to glide through the crowd. Wilkes's counsel argued against the

outlawry, and then Lord Mansfield, in a speech of an hour and a half,

set it aside; not on _their_ reasons, but on grounds which he had

discovered in it himself. I think they say it was on some flaw in the

Christian name of the county, which should not have been _Middlesex to

wit_,--but I protest I don't know, for I am here alone, and picked up my

intelligence as I walked in our meadows by the river. You, who may be

walking by the Arno, will, perhaps, think there was some timidity in

this; but the depths of the Law are wonderful! So pray don't make any

rash conclusions, but stay till you get better information.

Well! now he is gone to prison again,--I mean Wilkes; and on Tuesday he

is to return to receive sentence on the old guilt of writing, as the

Scotch would _not_ call it, _the_ 45,[1] though they call the rebellion

so. The sentence may be imprisonment, fine, or pillory; but as I am

still near the Thames, I do not think the latter will be chosen. Oh! but

stay, he may plead against the indictment, and should there be an

improper _Middlesex to wit_ in that too, why then in that case, you

know, he did _not_ write _the_ 45, and then he is as white as milk, and

as free as air, and as good a member of Parliament as if he had never

been expelled. In short, my dear Sir, I am trying to explain to you

what I literally do not understand; all I do know is, that Mr. Cooke,

the other member for Middlesex, is just dead, and that we are going to

have another Middlesex election, which is very unpleasant to me, who

hate mobs so near as Brentford. Sergeant Glynn, Wilkes's counsel, is the

candidate, and I suppose the only one in the present humour of the

people, who will care to have his brains dashed out, in order to sit in

Parliament. In truth, this enthusiasm is confined to the very mob or

little higher, and does not extend beyond the County. All other riots

are ceased, except the little civil war between the sailors and

coal-heavers, in which two or three lives are lost every week.

[Footnote 1: "_The_ 45" here serves for the Scotch rebellion of 1745,

and for No. 45 of the _North Briton_.]

What is most disagreeable, even the Emperor of Morocco has taken courage

on these tumults, and has dared to mutiny for increase of wages, like

our journeymen tailors. France is pert too, and gives herself airs in

the Mediterranean. Our Paolists were violent for support of Corsica, but

I think they are a little startled on a report that the hero Paoli is

like other patriots, and is gone to Versailles, for a peerage and

pension. I was told to-day that at London there are murmurs of a war. I

shall be sorry if it prove so. Deaths! suspense, say victory;--how end

all our victories? In debts and a wretched peace! Mad world, in the

individual or the aggregate!

Well! say I to myself, and what is all this to me? Have not I done with

that world? Am not I here at peace, unconnected with Courts and

Ministries, and indifferent who is Minister? What is a war in Europe to

me more than a war between the Turkish and Persian Emperors? True; yet

self-love makes one love the nation one belongs to, and vanity makes one

wish to have that nation glorious. Well! I have seen it so; I have seen

its conquests spread farther than Roman eagles thought there was land. I

have seen too the Pretender at Derby; and, therefore, you must know that

I am content with historic seeing, and wish Fame and History would be

quiet and content without entertaining me with any more sights. We were

down at Derby, we were up at both Indies; I have no curiosity for any

intermediate sights.

Your brother was with me just before I came out of town, and spoke of

you with great kindness, and accused himself of not writing to you, but

protested it was from not knowing what to say to you about the Riband. I

engaged to write for him, so you must take this letter as from him too.

I hope there will be no war for some hero to take your honours out of

your mouth, sword in hand. The first question I shall ask when I go to

town will be, how my Lord Chatham does? I shall mind his health more

than the stocks. The least symptom of a war will certainly cure him.

Adieu! my dear Sir.

_THE ENGLISH CLIMATE._

Letters of Horace Walpole — Volume II · 第 63 / 134 题