TO GEORGE MONTAGU, ESQ.

STRAWBERRY HILL, _June_ 20, 1766.

I don't know when I shall see you, but therefore must not I write to

you? yet I have as little to say as may be. I could cry through a whole

page over the bad weather. I have but a lock of hay, you know, and I

cannot get it dry, unless I bring it to the fire. I would give

half-a-crown for a pennyworth of sun. It is abominable to be ruined in

coals in the middle of June.

What pleasure have you to come! there is a new thing published, that

will make you burst your cheeks with laughing. It is called the "New

Bath Guide."[1] It stole into the world, and for a fortnight no soul

looked into it, concluding its name was its true name. No such thing. It

is a set of letters in verse, in all kind of verses, describing the life

at Bath, and incidentally everything else; but so much wit, so much

humour, fun, and poetry, so much originality, never met together before.

Then the man has a better ear than Dryden or Handel. _Apropos_ to

Dryden, he has burlesqued his St. Cecilia, that you will never read it

again without laughing. There is a description of a milliner's box in

all the terms of landscape, _painted lawns and chequered shades_, a

Moravian ode, and a Methodist ditty, that are incomparable, and the best

names that ever were composed. I can say it by heart, though a quarto,

and if I had time would write it you down; for it is not yet reprinted,

and not one to be had.

[Footnote 1: By Christopher Anstey. "Have you read the 'New Bath Guide'?

It is the only thing in fashion, and is a new and original kind of

humour. Miss Prue's conversation I doubt you will paste down, as Sir W.

St. Quintyn did before he carried it to his daughter; yet I remember you

all read 'Crazy Tales' without pasting" (_Gray to Wharton.--Works by

Mitford_, vol. iv. p. 84).]

There are two new volumes, too, of Swift's Correspondence, that will not

amuse you less in another way, though abominable, for there are letters

of twenty persons now alive; fifty of Lady Betty Germain, one that does

her great honour, in which she defends her friend my Lady Suffolk, with

all the spirit in the world,[1] against that brute, who hated everybody

that he hoped would get him a mitre, and did not. There is one to his

Miss Vanhomrigh, from which I think it plain he lay with her,

notwithstanding his supposed incapacity, yet not doing much honour to

that capacity, for he says he can drink coffee but once a week, and I

think you will see very clearly what he means by coffee. His own journal

sent to Stella during the four last years of the Queen, is a fund of

entertainment. You will see his insolence in full colours, and, at the

same time, how daily vain he was of being noticed by the Ministers he

affected to treat arrogantly. His panic at the Mohocks is comical; but

what strikes one, is bringing before one's eyes the incidents of a

curious period. He goes to the rehearsal of "Cato," and says the _drab_

that acted Cato's daughter could not say her part. This was only Mrs.

Oldfield. I was saying before George Selwyn, that this journal put me in

mind of the present time, there was the same indecision, irresolution,

and want of system; but I added, "There is nothing new under the sun."

"No," said Selwyn, "nor under the grandson."

[Footnote 1: The letter dated Feb. 8, 1732-3.]

My Lord Chesterfield has done me much honour: he told Mrs. Anne Pitt

that he would subscribe to any politics I should lay down. When she

repeated this to me, I said, "Pray tell him I have laid down politics."

I am got into puns, and will tell you an excellent one of the King of

France, though it does not spell any better than Selwyn's. You must have

heard of Count Lauragais, and his horse-race, and his quacking his horse

till he killed it.[1] At his return the King asked him what he had been

doing in England? "Sire, j'ai appris à penser"--"Des chevaux?"[2]

replied the King. Good night! I am tired and going to bed. Yours ever.

[Footnote 1: In a previous letter Walpole mentioned that the Count and

the English Lord Forbes had had a race, which the Count lost; and that,

as his horse died the following night, surgeons were employed to open

the body, and they declared he had been poisoned. "The English," says

Walpole, "suspect that a groom, who, I suppose, had been reading Livy or

Demosthenes, poisoned it on patriotic principles to secure victory to

his country. The French, on the contrary, think poison as common as oats

or beans in the stables at Newmarket. In short, there is no impertinence

which they have not uttered; and it has gone so far that two nights ago

it was said that the King had forbidden another race which was appointed

for Monday between the Prince de Nassau and a Mr. Forth, to prevent

national animosities."]

[Footnote 2: Louis pretending to think he had said _pansen_.]

_BATH--WESLEY._

Letters of Horace Walpole — Volume II · 第 56 / 134 题