TO SIR HORACE MANN.

PARIS, _Feb._ 29, 1766.

I have received your letters very regularly, and though I have not sent

you nearly so many, yet I have not been wanting to our correspondence,

when I have had anything particular to say, or knew what to say. The

Duke of Richmond has been gone to England this fortnight; he had a

great deal of business, besides engagements here; and if he has failed

writing, at least I believe he received yours. Mr. Conway, I suppose,

has received them too, but not to my knowledge; for I have received but

one from him this age. He has had something else to do than to think of

Pretenders, and pretenders to pretensions. It has been a question (and a

question scarcely decided yet) not only whether he and his friends

should remain Ministers, but whether we should not draw the sword on our

colonies, and provoke them and the manufacturers at home to rebellion.

The goodness of Providence, or Fortune by its permission, has

interposed, and I hope prevented blood; though George Grenville and the

Duke of Bedford, who so mercifully checked our victories, in compassion

to France, grew heroes the moment there was an opportunity of conquering

our own brethren. It was actually moved by them and their banditti to

send troops to America. The stout Earl of Bute, who is never afraid when

not personally in danger, joined his troops to his ancient friends, late

foes, and now new allies. Yet this second race of Spaniards, so fond of

gold and thirsting after American blood, were routed by 274; their whole

force amounting but to 134. The Earl, astonished at this defeat, had

recourse to that kind of policy which Machiavel recommends in his

chapter of _back-stairs_. Caesar himself disavowed his Ministers, and

declared he had not been for the repeal, and that his servants had used

his name without his permission. A paper was produced to his eyes,

which proved this denial an equivocation. The Ministers, instead of

tossing their places into the middle of the closet, as I should have

done, had the courage and virtue to stand firm, and save both Europe and

America from destruction.

At that instant, who do you think presented himself as Lord Bute's

guardian angel? only one of his bitterest enemies: a milk-white angel

[Duke of York], white even to his eyes and eyelashes, very purblind, and

whose tongue runs like a fiddlestick. You have seen this divinity, and

have prayed to it for a Riband. Well, this god of love became the god of

politics, and contrived meetings between Bute, Grenville, and Bedford;

but, what happens to highwaymen _after_ a robbery, happened to them

_before_; they quarrelled about the division of the plunder, before they

had made the capture--and thus, when the last letters came away, the

repeal was likely to pass in both houses, and tyranny once more

despairs.

This is the quintessence of the present situation in England. To how

many _North Britons_, No. 45, will that wretched Scot furnish matter?

But let us talk of your _Cardinal Duke of York_[1]: so his folly has

left his brother in a worse situation than he took him up! _York_ seems

a title fated to sit on silly heads--or don't let us talk of him; he is

not worth it.

[Footnote 1: Cardinal York was the younger brother of Charles Edward. He

lived in Italy; and, after the death of his brother, assumed the title

of King of England as Henry IX. After the confiscation of the greater

part of the Papal revenues by Napoleon, his chief means of livelihood

was a pension of £4,000 a year allowed him by George IV. out of his

private purse.]

I am so sorry for the death of Lady Hillsborough, as I suppose Mr.

Skreene is glad of his consort's departure. She was a common creature,

bestowed on the public by Lord Sandwich. Lady Hillsborough had sense and

merit, and is a great loss to her family. By letters hither, we hear

miserable accounts of poor Sir James Macdonald; pray let him know that I

have written to him, and how much I am concerned for his situation.

This Court is plunged into another deep mourning for the death of old

Stanislaus,[1] who fell into the fire; it caught his night-gown and

burnt him terribly before he got assistance. His subjects are in

despair, for he was a model of goodness and humanity; uniting or rather

creating, generosity from economy. The Poles had not the sense to

re-elect him, after his virtues were proved, they who had chosen him

before they knew him. I am told such was the old man's affection for his

country, and persuasion that he ought to do all the good he could, that

he would have gone to Poland if they had offered him the crown. He has

left six hundred thousand livres, and a _rente viagere_ of forty

thousand crowns to the Queen, saved from the sale of his Polish estates,

from his pension of two millions, and from his own liberality. His

buildings, his employment of the poor, his magnificence, and his

economy, were constant topics of admiration. Not only the court-tables

were regularly and nobly served, but he treated, and defrayed his old

enemy's grand-daughter, the Princess Christina, on her journey hither to

see her sister the Dauphiness. When mesdames his grand-daughters made

him an unexpected visit, he was so disturbed for fear it should derange

his finances, which he thought were not in advance, that he shut himself

up for an hour with his treasurer, to find resources; was charmed to

know he should not run in debt, and entertained them magnificently. His

end was calm and gay, like his life, though he suffered terribly, and he

said so extraordinary a life could not finish in a common way. To a lady

who had set her ruffle on fire, and scorched her arm about the same

time, he said, "Madame, nous brulons du même feu." The poor Queen had

sent him the very night-gown that occasioned his death: he wrote to her,

"C'étoit pour me tenir chaud, mais il m'a tenu trop chaud."

[Footnote 1: Stanislaus Leczinski was the father of the queen of Louis

XV. On the conclusion of peace between France and the Empire it was

arranged that the Duke of Lorraine should exchange that duchy for

Tuscany, and that Lorraine should be allotted to Stanislaus, with a

reversion to his daughter and to France after his death.]

Yesterday we had the funeral oration on the Dauphin; and are soon to

have one on Stanislaus. It is a noble subject; but if I had leisure, I

would compose a grand funeral oration on the number of princes dead

within these six months. What fine pictures, contrasts, and comparisons

they would furnish! The Duke of Parma and the King of Denmark reigning

virtuously with absolute power! The Emperor at the head of Europe, and

encompassed with mimic Roman eagles, tied to the apron-strings, of a

bigoted and jealous virago. The Dauphin cultivating virtues under the

shade of so bright a crown, and shining only at the moment that he was

snatched from the prospect of empire. The old Pretender wasting away in

obscurity and misfortune, after surviving the Duke of Cumberland, who

had given the last blow to the hopes of his family; and Stanislaus

perishing by an accident,--he who had swam over the billows raised by

Peter the Great and Charles XII., and reigning, while his successor and

second of his name was reigning on his throne. It is not taking from the

funereal part to add, that when so many good princes die, the Czarina is

still living!

The public again thinks itself on the eve of a war, by the recall of

Stahremberg, the Imperial Minister. It seems at least to destroy the

expectation of a match between the youngest Archduchess and the Dauphin,

which it was thought Stahremberg remained here to bring about. I like

your Great Duke for feeling the loss of his Minister. It is seldom that

a young sovereign misses a governor before he tastes the fruits of his

own incapacity.

_March_ 1_st_.

We have got more letters from England, where the Ministers are still

triumphant. They had a majority of 108 on the day that it was voted to

bring in a bill to repeal the Stamp Act. George Grenville's ignorance

and blunders were displayed to his face and to the whole world; he was

hissed through the Court of Requests, where Mr. Conway was huzza'd. It

went still farther for Mr. Pitt, whom the mob accompanied home with "Io

Pitts!" This is new for an opposition to be so unpopular. Adieu!

_SINGULAR RIOT IN MADRID--CHANGES IN THE FRENCH MINISTRY--INSURRECTIONS

IN THE PROVINCES._

Letters of Horace Walpole — Volume II · 第 54 / 134 题