TO THE EARL OF HERTFORD.

ARLINGTON STREET, _March_ 26, 1765.

Three weeks are a great while, my dear lord, for me to have been without

writing to you; but besides that I have passed many days at Strawberry,

to cure my cold (which it has done), there has nothing happened worth

sending across the sea. Politics have dozed, and common events been fast

asleep. Of Guerchy's affair, you probably know more than I do; it is now

forgotten. I told him I had absolute proof of his innocence, for I was

sure, that if he had offered money for assassination, the men who swear

against him would have taken it.

The King has been very seriously ill, and in great danger. I would not

alarm you, as there were hopes when he was at the worst. I doubt he is

not free yet from his complaint, as the humour fallen on his breast

still oppresses him. They talk of his having a levée next week, but he

has not appeared in public, and the bills are passed by commission; but

he rides out. The Royal Family have suffered like us mortals; the Duke

of Gloucester has had a fever, but I believe his chief complaint is of

a youthful kind. Prince Frederick is thought to be in a deep

consumption; and for the Duke of Cumberland, next post will probably

certify you of his death, as he is relapsed, and there are no hopes of

him. He fell into his lethargy again, and when they waked him, he said

he did not know whether he could call himself obliged to them.

I dined two days ago at Monsieur de Guerchy's, with the Count de

Caraman, who brought me your letter. He seems a very agreeable man, and

you may be sure, for your sake, and Madame de Mirepoix's, no civilities

in my power shall be wanting. I have not yet seen Schouvaloff,[1] about

whom one has more curiosity--it is an opportunity of gratifying that

passion which one can so seldom do in personages of his historic nature,

especially remote foreigners. I wish M. de Caraman had brought the

"Siege of Calais," which he tells me is printed, though your account has

a little abated my impatience. They tell us the French comedians are to

act at Calais this summer--is it possible they can be so absurd, or

think us so absurd as to go thither, if we would not go further? I

remember, at Rheims, they believed that English ladies went to Calais to

drink champagne--is this the suite of that belief? I was mightily

pleased with the Duc de Choiseul's answer to the Clairon;[2] but when I

hear of the French admiration of Garrick, it takes off something of my

wonder at the prodigious adoration of him at home. I never could

conceive the marvellous merit of repeating the works of others in one's

own language with propriety, however well delivered. Shakespeare is not

more admired for writing his plays, than Garrick for acting them. I

think him a very good and very various player--but several have pleased

me more, though I allow not in so many parts. Quin[3] in Falstaff, was

as excellent as Garrick[4] in Lear. Old Johnson far more natural in

everything he attempted. Mrs. Porter and your Dumesnil surpassed him in

passionate tragedy; Cibber and O'Brien were what Garrick could never

reach, coxcombs, and men of fashion. Mrs. Clive is at least as perfect

in low comedy--and yet to me, Ranger was the part that suited Garrick

the best of all he ever performed. He was a poor Lothario, a ridiculous

Othello, inferior to Quin in Sir John Brute and Macbeth, and to Cibber

in Bayes, and a woful Lord Hastings and Lord Townley. Indeed, his Bayes

was original, but not the true part: Cibber was the burlesque of a great

poet, as the part was designed, but Garrick made it a Garretteer. The

town did not like him in Hotspur, and yet I don't know whether he did

not succeed in it beyond all the rest. Sir Charles Williams and Lord

Holland thought so too, and they were no bad judges. I am impatient to

see the Clairon, and certainly will, as I have promised, though I have

not fixed my day. But do you know you alarm me! There was a time when I

was a match for Madame de Mirepoix at pharaoh, to any hour of the night,

and I believe did play with her five nights in a week till three and

four in the morning--but till eleven o'clock to-morrow morning--Oh! that

is a little too much, even at loo. Besides, I shall not go to Paris for

pharaoh--if I play all night, how shall I see everything all day?

[Footnote 1: Schouvaloff was notorious as a favourite of the Empress

Catharine.]

[Footnote 2: Mdlle. Clairon had been for some years the most admired

tragic actress in France. In that age actors and actresses in France

were exposed to singular insults. M. Lacroix, in his "France in the

Eighteenth Century," tells us: "They were considered as inferior beings

in the social scale; excommunicated by the Church, and banished from

society, they were compelled to endure all the humiliations and affronts

which the public chose to inflict on them in the theatre; and, if any of

them had the courage to make head against the storm, and to resist the

violence and cruelty of the pit, they were sent to prison, and not

released but on condition of apologising to the tyrants who had so

cruelly insulted them. Many had a sufficient sense of their own dignity

to withdraw themselves from this odious despotism after having been in

prison in Fort l'Evêcque, their ordinary place of confinement, by the

order of the gentlemen of the chamber or the lieutenant of police; and

it was in this way that Mdlle. Clairon bade farewell to the Comédie

Française and gave up acting in 1765, when at the very height of her

talent, and in the middle of her greatest dramatic triumphs." The

incident here alluded to by Walpole was that "a critic named Fréron had

libelled her in a journal to which he contributed; and, as she could not

obtain justice, she applied to the Duc de Choiseul, the Prime Minister.

Even he was unable to put her in the way of obtaining redress, and

sought to pacify her by comparing her position to his own. 'I am,' said

he, 'mademoiselle, like yourself, a public performer; with this

difference in your favour, that you choose what parts you please, and

are sure to be crowned with the applause of the public; for I reckon as

nothing the bad taste of one or two wretched individuals who have the

misfortune of not adoring you. I, on the other hand, am obliged to act

the parts imposed on me by necessity. I am sure to please nobody; I am

satirised, criticised, libelled, hissed; yet I continue to do my best.

Let us both, then, sacrifice our little resentments and enmities to the

public service, and serve our country, each in our own station. Besides,

the Queen has condescended to forgive Fréron, and you may therefore,

without compromising your dignity, imitate Her Majesty's clemency'"

("Mem. de Bachaumont," i. 61). But Mdlle. was not to be pacified, nor to

be persuaded to expose herself to a repetition of insult; but, though

only forty-one, she retired from the stage for ever.]

[Footnote 3: Quin was employed by the Princess of Wales to teach her son

elocution, and when he heard how generally his young sovereign was

praised for the grace and dignity of his delivery of his speech to his

Parliament, he boasted, "Ah, it was I taught the boy to speak."]

[Footnote 4: Garrick was not only a great actor, but also a great

reformer of the stage. He seems to have excelled equally both in tragedy

and comedy, which makes it natural to suppose that in some parts he may

have been excelled by other actors; though he had no equal (and perhaps

never has had) in both lines. He was also himself the author of several

farces of more than average merit.]

Lady Sophia Thomas has received the Baume de vie, for which she gives

you a thousand thanks, and I ten thousand.

We are extremely amused with the wonderful histories of your hyena[1] in

the Gevaudan; but our fox-hunters despise you: it is exactly the

enchanted monster of old romances. If I had known its history a few

months ago, I believe it would have appeared in the "Castle of

Otranto,"--the success of which has, at last, brought me to own it,

though the wildness of it made me terribly afraid; but it was

comfortable to have it please so much, before any mortal suspected the

author: indeed, it met with too much honour far, for at first it was

universally believed to be Mr. Gray's. As all the first impression is

sold, I am hurrying out another, with a new preface, which I will send

you.

[Footnote 1: A wolf of enormous size, and, in some respects, irregular

conformation, which for a long time ravaged the Gevaudan; it was, soon

after the date of this letter, killed, and Mr. Walpole saw it in Paris.]

_RIOTS OF WEAVERS--MINISTERIAL CHANGES--FACTIOUS CONDUCT OF MR. PITT._

Letters of Horace Walpole — Volume II · 第 43 / 134 题