The real "lucky" speculator is of a very different character

Produced by Jonathan Ingram, Jared Buck and the PG Online Distributed

Proofreading Team (https://www.pgdp.net).

SUCCESS

BY LORD BEAVERBROOK

SECOND EDITION

LONDON STANLEY PAUL & CO 31 ESSEX STREET, STRAND, W.C.2

_First published in November 1921_; _Reprinted November 1921_

PUBLISHERS' NOTE

The contents of this volume originally appeared as weekly articles by

Lord Beaverbrook in the _Sunday Express_. They aroused so much interest,

and so many applications were received for copies of the various

articles, that it was decided to have them collected and printed in

volume form.

He who buys _Success_, reads and digests its precepts, will find this

inspiring volume a sure will-tonic. It will nerve him to be up and

doing. It will put such spring and go into him that he will make a

determined start on that road which, pursued with perseverance, leads

onwards and upwards to the desired goal--SUCCESS.

PREFACE

The articles embodied in this small book were written during the

pressure of many other affairs and without any idea that they would be

published as a consistent whole. It is, therefore, certain that the

critic will find in them instances of a repetition of the central idea.

This fact is really a proof of a unity of conception which justifies

their publication in a collected form. I set out to ask the question,

"What is success in the affairs of the world--how is it attained, and

how can it be enjoyed?" I have tried with all sincerity to answer the

question out of my own experience. In so doing I have strayed down many

avenues of inquiry, but all of them lead back to the central conception

of success as some kind of temple which satisfies the mind of the

ordinary practical man.

Other fields of mental satisfaction have been left entirely outside as

not germane to the inquiry.

I address myself to the young men of the new age. Those who have youth

also possess opportunity. There is in the British Empire to-day no bar

to success which resolution cannot break. The young clerk has the key of

success in his pocket, if he has the courage and the ability to turn the

lock which leads to the Temple of Success. The wide world of business

and finance is open to him. Any public dinner or meeting contains

hundreds of men who can succeed if they will only observe the rules

which govern achievement.

A career to-day is open to talent, for there is no heredity in finance,

commerce, or industry. The Succession and Death Duties are wiping out

those reserves by which old-fashioned banks and businesses warded off

from themselves for two or three generations the result of hereditary

incompetence. Ability is bound to be recognised from whatever source it

springs. The struggle in finance and commerce is too intense and the

battle too world-wide to prevent individual efficiency playing a bigger

and a better rôle.

If I have given encouragement to a single young man to set his feet on

the path which leads upwards to success, and warned him of a few of the

perils which will beset him on the road, I shall feel perfectly

satisfied that this book has not been written in vain.

BEAVERBROOK.

CONTENTS

I. SUCCESS

II. HAPPINESS: THREE SECRETS

III. LUCK

IV. MODERATION

V. MONEY

VI. EDUCATION

VII. ARROGANCE

VIII. COURAGE

IX. PANIC

X. DEPRESSION

XI. FAILURE

XII. CONSISTENCY

XIII. PREJUDICE

XIV. CALM

I

SUCCESS

Success--that is the royal road we all want to tread, for the echo off

its flagstones sounds pleasantly in the mind. It gives to man all that

the natural man desires: the opportunity of exercising his activities to

the full; the sense of power; the feeling that life is a slave, not a

master; the knowledge that some great industry has quickened into life

under the impulse of a single brain.

To each his own particular branch of this difficult art. The artist

knows one joy, the soldier another; what delights the business man

leaves the politician cold. But however much each section of society

abuses the ambitions or the morals of the other, all worship equally at

the same shrine. No man really wants to spend his whole life as a

reporter, a clerk, a subaltern, a private Member, or a curate. Downing

Street is as attractive as the oak-leaves of the field-marshal; York and

Canterbury as pleasant as a dominance in Lombard Street or Burlington

House.

For my own part I speak of the only field of success I know--the world

of ordinary affairs. And I start with a contradiction in terms. Success

is a constitutional temperament bestowed on the recipient by the gods.

And yet you may have all the gifts of the fairies and fail utterly. Man

cannot add an inch to his stature, but by taking thought he can walk

erect; all the gifts given at birth can be destroyed by a single curse.

Like all human affairs, success is partly a matter of predestination and

partly of free will. You cannot make the genius, but you can either

improve or destroy it, and most men and women possess the assets which

can be turned into success.

But those who possess the precious gifts will have both to hoard and to

expand them.

What are the qualities which make for success? They are three:

Judgment, Industry, and Health, and perhaps the greatest of these is

judgment. These are the three pillars which hold up the fabric of

success. But in using the word judgment one has said everything.

In the affairs of the world it is the supreme quality. How many men have

brilliant schemes and yet are quite unable to execute them, and through

their very brilliancy stumble unawares upon ruin? For round judgment

there cluster many hundred qualities, like the setting round a jewel:

the capacity to read the hearts of men; to draw an inexhaustible

fountain of wisdom from every particle of experience in the past, and

turn the current of this knowledge into the dynamic action of the

future. Genius goes to the heart of a matter like an arrow from a bow,

but judgment is the quality which learns from the world what the world

has to teach and then goes one better. Shelley had genius, but he would

not have been a success in Wall Street--though the poet showed a flash

of business knowledge in refusing to lend money to Byron.

In the ultimate resort judgment is the power to assimilate knowledge

and to use it. The opinions of men and the movement of markets are all

so much material for the perfected instrument of the mind.

But judgment may prove a sterile capacity if it is not accompanied by

industry. The mill must have grist on which to work, and it is industry

which pours in the grain.

A great opportunity may be lost and an irretrievable error committed by

a brief break in the lucidity of the intellect or in the train of

thought. "He who would be Cæsar anywhere," says Kipling, "must know

everything everywhere." Nearly everything comes to the man who is always

all there.

Men are not really born either hopelessly idle, or preternaturally

industrious. They may move in one direction or the other as will or

circumstances dictate, but it is open to any man to work. Hogarth's

industrious and idle apprentice point a moral, but they do not tell a

true tale. The real trouble about industry is to apply it in the right

direction--and it is therefore the servant of judgment. The true secret

of industry well applied is concentration, and there are many

well-known ways of learning that art--the most potent handmaiden of

success. Industry can be acquired; it should never be squandered.

But health is the foundation both of judgment and industry--and

therefore of success. And without health everything is difficult. Who

can exercise a sound judgment if he is feeling irritable in the morning?

Who can work hard if he is suffering from a perpetual feeling of

malaise?

The future lies with the people who will take exercise and not too much

exercise. Athleticism may be hopeless as a career, but as a drug it is

invaluable. No ordinary man can hope to succeed who does not work his

body in moderation. The danger of the athlete is to believe that in

kicking a goal he has won the game of life. His object is no longer to

be fit for work, but to be superfit for play. He sees the means and the

end through an inverted telescope. The story books always tell us that

the Rowing Blue finishes up as a High Court Judge.

The truth is very different. The career of sport leads only to failure,

satiety, or impotence.

The hero of the playing fields becomes the dunce of the office. Other

men go on playing till middle-age robs them of their physical powers. At

the end the whole thing is revealed as vanity. Play tennis or golf once

a day and you may be famous; play it three times a day and you will be

in danger of being thought a professional--without the reward.

The pursuit of pleasure is equally ephemeral. Time and experience rob

even amusement of its charm, and the night before is not worth next

morning's headache. Practical success alone makes early middle-age the

most pleasurable period of a man's career. What has been worked for in

youth then comes to its fruition.

It is true that brains alone are not influence, and that money alone is

not influence, but brains and money combined are power. And fame, the

other object of ambition, is only another name for either money or

power.

Never was there a moment more favourable for turning talent towards

opportunity and opportunity into triumph than Great Britain now presents

to the man or woman whom ambition stirs to make a success of life. The

dominions of the British Empire abolished long ago the privileges which

birth confers. No bar has been set there to prevent poverty rising to

the heights of wealth and power, if the man were found equal to the

task.

The same development has taken place in Great Britain to-day. Men are no

longer born into Cabinets; the ladder of education is rapidly reaching a

perfection which enables a man born in a cottage or a slum attaining the

zenith of success and power.

There stand the three attributes to be attained--Judgment, Industry, and

Health. Judgment can be improved, industry can be acquired, health can

be attained by those who will take the trouble. These are the three

pillars on which we can build the golden pinnacle of success.

II

HAPPINESS: THREE SECRETS

Near by the Temple of Success based on the three pillars of Health,

Industry, and Judgment, stands another temple. Behind the curtains of

its doors is concealed the secret of happiness.

There are, of course, many forms of that priceless gift. Different

temperaments will interpret it differently. Various experiences will

produce variations of the blessing. A man may make a failure in his

affairs and yet remain happy. The spiritual and inner life is a thing

apart from material success. Even a man who, like Robert Louis

Stevenson, suffers from chronic ill-health can still be happy.

But we must leave out these exceptions and deal with the normal man, who

lives by and for his practical work, and who desires and enjoys both

success and health. Granted that he has these two possessions, must he

of necessity be happy? Not so. He may have access to the first temple,

but the other temple may still be forbidden him. A rampant ambition can

be a torture to him. An exaggerated selfishness can make his life

miserable, or an uneasy conscience may join with the sins of pride to

take their revenge on his mentality. For the man who has attained

success and health there are three great rules: "To do justly, and to

love mercy, and to walk humbly." These are the three pillars of the

Temple of Happiness.

Justice, which is another word for honesty in practice and in intention,

is perhaps the easiest of the virtues for the successful man of affairs

to acquire. His experience has schooled him to something more profound

than the acceptance of the rather crude dictum that "Honesty is the best

policy"--which is often interpreted to mean that it is a mistake to go

to gaol. But real justice must go far beyond a mere fear of the law, or

even a realisation that it does not pay to indulge in sharp practice in

business. It must be a mental habit--a fixed intention to be fair in

dealing with money or politics, a natural desire to be just and to

interpret all bargains and agreements in the spirit as well as in the

letter.

The idea that nearly all successful men are unscrupulous is very

frequently accepted. To the man who knows, the doctrine is simply

foolish. Success is not the only or the final test of character, but it

is the best rough-and-ready reckoner. The contrary view that success

probably implies a moral defect springs from judging a man by the

opinions of his rivals, enemies, or neighbours. The real judges of a

man's character are his colleagues. If they speak well of him, there is

nothing much wrong. The failure, on the other hand, can always be sure

of being popular with the men who have beaten him. They give him a

testimonial instead of a cheque. It would be too curious a speculation

to pursue to ask whether Justice, like the other virtues, is not a form

of self-interest. To answer it in the affirmative would condemn equally

the doctrines of the Sermon on the Mount and the advice to do unto

others what they should do unto you. But this is certain. No man can be

happy if he suffers from a perpetual doubt of his own justice.

The second quality, Mercy, has been regarded as something in contrast or

conflict with justice. It is not really so. Mercy resembles the

prerogative of the judge to temper the law to suit individual cases. It

must be of a kindred temper with justice, or it would degenerate into

mere weakness or folly. A man wants to be certain of his own just

inclination before he can dare to handle mercy. But the quality of mercy

is, perhaps, not so common in the human heart as to require this

caution. It is a quality that has to be acquired. But the man of success

and affairs ought to be the last person to complain of the difficulty of

acquiring it. He has in his early days felt the whip-hand too often not

to sympathise with the feelings of the under-dog. And he always knows

that at some time in his career he, too, may need a merciful

interpretation of a financial situation. Shakespeare may not have had

this in his mind when he said that mercy "blesseth him that gives and

him that takes"; but he is none the less right. Those who exercise mercy

lay up a store of it for themselves. Shylock had law on his side, but

not justice or mercy. One is reminded of his case by the picture of

certain Jews and Gentiles alike as seen playing roulette at Monte Carlo.

Their losses, inevitable to any one who plays long enough, seem to

sadden them. M. Blanc would be doing a real act of mercy if he would

exact his toll not in cash, but in flesh. Some of the players are of a

figure and temperament which would miss the pound of flesh far less than

the pound sterling.

What, then, in its essence is the quality of mercy? It is something

beyond the mere desire not to push an advantage too far. It is a feeling

of tenderness springing out of harsh experience, as a flower springs out

of a rock. It is an inner sense of gratitude for the scheme of things,

finding expression in outward action, and, therefore, assuring its

possessor of an abiding happiness.

The quality of Humility is by far the most difficult to attain. There

is something deep down in the nature of a successful man of affairs

which seems to conflict with it. His career is born in a sense of

struggle and courage and conquest, and the very type of the effort seems

to invite in the completed form a temperament of arrogance. I cannot

pretend to be humble myself; all I can confess is the knowledge that in

so far as I could acquire humility I should be happier. Indeed, many

instances prove that success and humility are not incompatible. One of

the most eminent of our politicians is by nature incurably modest. The

difficulty in reconciling the two qualities lies in that "perpetual

presence of self to self which, though common enough in men of great

ambition and ability, never ceases to be a flaw."

But there is certainly one form of humility which all successful men

ought to be able to practise. They can avoid a fatal tendency to look

down on and despise the younger men who are planting their feet in their

own footsteps. The established arrogance which refuses credit or

opportunity to rising talent is unpardonable. A man who gives way to

what is really simply a form of jealousy cannot hope to be happy, for

jealousy is above all others the passion which tears the heart.

The great stumbling block which prevents success embracing humility is

the difficulty of distinguishing between the humble mind and the

cowardly one. When does humility merge into moral cowardice and courage

into arrogance? Some men in history have had this problem solved for

them. Stonewall Jackson is a type of the man of supreme courage and

action and judgment who was yet supremely humble--but he owed his bodily

and mental qualities to nature and his humility to the intensity of his

Presbyterian faith. Few men are so fortunately compounded.

Still, if the moral judgment is worth anything, a man should be able to

practise courage without arrogance and to walk humbly without fear. If

he can accomplish the feat he will reap no material reward, but an

immense harvest of inner well-being. He will have found the blue bird of

happiness which escapes so easily from the snare. He will have joined

Justice to Mercy and added Humility to Courage, and in the light of this

self-knowledge he will have attained the zenith of a perpetual

satisfaction.

III

LUCK

Some of the critics do not believe that the pinnacle of success stands

only on the three pillars of Judgment, Industry, and Health. They point

out that I have omitted one vital factor--Luck. So widespread is this

belief, largely pagan in its origin, that mere fortune either makes or

unmakes men, that it seems worth while to discuss and refute this

dangerous delusion.

Of course, if the doctrine merely means that men are the victims of

circumstances and surroundings, it is a truism. It is luckier to be born

heir to a peerage and £100,000 than to be born in Whitechapel. Past and

present Chancellors of the Exchequer have gone far in removing much of

this discrepancy in fortune. Again, a disaster which destroys a single

individual may alter the whole course of a survivor's career. But the

devotees of the Goddess of Luck do not mean this at all. They hold that

some men are born lucky and others unlucky, as though some Fortune

presided at their birth; and that, irrespective of all merits, success

goes to those on whom Fortune smiles and defeat to those on whom she

frowns. Or at least luck is regarded as a kind of attribute of a man

like a capacity for arithmetic or games.

This view is in essence the belief of the true gambler--not the man who

backs his skill at cards, or his knowledge of racing against his

rival--but who goes to the tables at Monte Carlo backing runs of good or

ill luck. It has been defined as a belief in the imagined tendencies of

chance to produce events continuously favourable or continuously

unfavourable.

The whole conception is a nightmare of the mind, peculiarly unfavourable

to success in business. The laws of games of chance are as inexorable as

those of the universe. A skilful player will, in the long run, defeat a

less skilful one; the bank at Monte Carlo will always beat the

individual if he stays long enough. I presume that the bank there is

managed honestly, although I neither know nor care whether it is. But

this at least is certain--the cagnotte gains 3 per cent. on every spin.

Mathematically, a man is bound to lose the capital he invests in every

thirty throws when his luck is neither good nor bad. In the long run his

luck will leave him with a balanced book--minus the cagnotte. My advice

to any man would be, "Never play roulette at all; but if you must play,

hold the cagnotte."

The Press, of course, often publishes stories of great fortunes made at

Monte Carlo. The proprietors there understand publicity. Such statements

bring them new patrons.

It is necessary to dwell on this gambling side of the question, because

every man who believes in luck has a touch of the gambler in him, though

he may never have played a stake. And from the point of view of real

success in affairs the gambler is doomed in advance. It is a frame of

mind which a man should discourage severely when he finds it within the

citadel of his mind. It is a view which too frequently infects young men

with more ambition than industry.

The view of Fortune as some shining goddess sweeping down from heaven

and touching the lucky recipient with her pinions of gold dazzles the

mind of youth. Men think that with a single stroke they will either be

made rich for life or impoverished for ever.

The more usual view is less ambitious. It is the complaint that Fortune

has never looked a man's way. Failure due to lack of industry is excused

on the ground that the goddess has proved adverse. There is a third form

of this mental disease. A young man spoke to me in Monte Carlo the other

day, and said, "I could do anything if only I had the chance, but that

chance never comes my way." On that same evening I saw the aspirant

throwing away whatever chance he may have had at the tables.

A similar type of character is to be found in the young man who

consistently refuses good offers or even small chances of work because

they are not good enough for him. He expects that Luck will suddenly

bestow on him a ready-made position or a gorgeous chance suitable to the

high opinions he holds of his own capacities. After a time people tire

of giving him any openings at all. In wooing the Goddess of Luck he has

neglected the Goddess of Opportunity.

These men in middle age fall into a well-known class. They can be seen

haunting the Temple, and explaining to their more industrious and

successful associates that they would have been Lord Chancellor if a big

brief had ever come their way. They develop that terrible disease known

as "the genius of the untried." Their case is almost as pitiful or

ludicrous as that of the man of very moderate abilities whom drink or

some other vice has rendered quite incapable. There will still be found

men to whisper to each other as he passes, "Ah, if Brown didn't drink,

he might do anything."

Far different will be the mental standpoint of the man who really means

to succeed. He will banish the idea of luck from his mind. He will

accept every opportunity, however small it may appear, which seems to

lead to the possibility of greater things. He will not wait on luck to

open the portals to fortune. He will seize opportunity by the forelock

and develop its chances by his industry. Here and there he may go

wrong, where judgment or experience is lacking. But out of his very

defeats he will learn to do better in the future, and in the maturity of

his knowledge he will attain success. At least, he will not be found

sitting down and whining that luck alone has been against him.

There remains a far more subtle argument in favour of the gambling

temperament which believes in luck. It is that certain men possess a

kind of sixth sense in the realm of speculative enterprise. These men,

it is said, know by inherent instinct, divorced from reasoned knowledge,

what enterprise will succeed or fail, or whether the market will rise or

fall. They are the children of fortune.

The real diagnosis of these cases is a very different one from that put

forward by the mystic apostles of the Golden Luck. Eminent men who are

closely in touch with the great affairs of politics or business often

act on what appears to be a mere instinct of this kind. But, in truth,

they have absorbed, through a careful and continuous study of events

both in the present and the past, so much knowledge, that their minds

reach a conclusion automatically, just as the heart beats without any

stimulus from the brain. Ask them for the reasons of their decision, and

they become inarticulate or unintelligible in their replies. Their

conscious mind cannot explain the long-hoarded experience of their

subconscious self. When they prove right in their forecast, the world

exclaims, "What luck!" Well, if luck of that kind is long enough

continued it will be best ascribed to judgment.

The real "lucky" speculator is of a very different character. He makes a

brilliant coup or so and then disappears in some overwhelming disaster.

He is as quick in losing his fortune as he is in making it. Nothing

except Judgment and Industry, backed by Health, will ensure real and

permanent success. The rest is sheer superstition.

Two pictures may be put before the believer in luck as an element in

success. The one is Monte Carlo--where the Goddess Fortune is chiefly

worshipped--steeped in almost perpetual sunshine, piled in castellated

masses against its hills, gaining the sense of the illimitable from the

blue horizon of the Mediterranean--a shining land meant for clean

exercise and repose. Yet there youth is only seen in its depravity,

while old age flocks to the central gambling hell to excite or mortify

its jaded appetites by playing a game it is bound to lose.

Here you may see in their decay the people who believe in luck, steeped

in an atmosphere of smoke and excitement, while beauty of Nature or the

pursuits of health call to them in vain. Three badly lighted tennis

courts compete with thirty splendidly furnished casino rooms. But of

means for obtaining the results of exercise without the exertion there

is no end. The Salle des Bains offers to the fat and the jaded the hot

bath, the electric massage, and all the mechanical instruments for

restoring energy. Modern science and art combine to outdo the

attractions of the baths of Imperial Rome.

In far different surroundings from these were born the careers of the

living captains of modern industry and finance--Inchcape, Pirrie,

Cowdray, Leverhulme, or McKenna. These men believed in industry, not in

fortune, and in judgment rather than in chance. The youth of this

generation will do well to be guided by their example, and follow their

road to success. Not by the worship of the Goddess of Luck were the

great fortunes established or the great reputations made.

It is natural and right for youth to hope, but if hope turns to a belief

in luck, it becomes a poison to the mind. The youth of England has

before it a splendid opportunity, but let it remember always that

nothing but work and brains counts, and that a man can even work himself

into brains. No goddess will open to any man the portals of the temple

of success. Young men must advance boldly to the central shrine along

the arduous but well-tried avenues of Judgment and Industry.

IV

MODERATION

Judgment, Industry, and Health, as the instruments of success, depend

largely on a fourth quality, which may be called either restraint or

moderation. The successful men of these arduous days are those who

control themselves strictly.

Those who are learned in the past may point out exceptions to this rule.

But Charles James Fox or Bolingbroke were only competing with equals in

the art of genteel debauchery. Their habits were those of their

competitors. They were not fighting men who safeguarded their health and

kept a cool head in the morning. It is impossible to imagine to-day a

leader of the Opposition who, after a night of gambling at faro, would

go down without a breakfast or a bath to develop an important attack on

the Government. The days of the brilliant debauchee are over.

Politicians no longer retire for good at forty to nurse the gout. The

antagonists that careless genius would have to meet in the modern world

would be of sterner stuff.

The modern men of action realise that a sacrifice of health is a

sacrifice of years--and that every year is of value. They protect their

constitutions as the final bulwark against the assault of the enemy. A

man without a digestion is likely to be a man without a heart. Political

and financial courage spring as much from the nerves or the stomach as

from the brain. And without courage no politician or business man is

worth anything. Moderation is, therefore, the secret of success.

And, above all, I would urge on ambitious youth the absolute necessity

of moderation in alcohol. I am the last man in the world to be in favour

of the regulation of the social habits of the people by law. Here every

man should be his own controller and law-giver. But this much is

certain: no man can achieve success who is not strict with himself in

this matter; nor is it a bad thing for an aspiring man of business to be

a teetotaller.

Take the case of the Prime Minister. No man is more careful of himself.

He sips a single glass of burgundy at dinner for the obvious reason that

he enjoys it, and not because it might stimulate his activities. He has

given up the use of tobacco. Bolingbroke as a master of manoeuvres would

have had a poor chance against him. For Bolingbroke lost his nerve in

the final disaster, whereas the Prime Minister could always be trusted

to have all his wits and courage about him. Mr. Lloyd George is regarded

as a man riding the storm of politics with nerves to drive him on. No

view could be more untrue. In the very worst days of the war in 1916 he

could be discovered at the War Office taking his ten minutes' nap with

his feet up on a chair and discarded newspapers lying like the débris of

a battle-field about him. It would be charitable to suppose that he had

fallen asleep before he had read his newspapers! He even takes his golf

in very moderate doses. We are often told that he needs a prolonged

holiday, but somewhere in his youth he finds inexhaustible reserves of

power which he conserves into his middle age. In this way he has found

the secret of his temporary Empire. It is for this reason that the man

in command is never too busy to see a caller who has the urgency of

vital business at his back.

The Ex-Leader of the Conservative Party, Mr. Bonar Law, however much he

may differ from the Premier in many aspects of his temperament, also

finds the foundation of his judgment in exercise and caution. As a

player of games he is rather poor, but makes up in enthusiasm for tennis

what he lacks in skill. His habits are almost ascetic in their rigour.

He drinks nothing, and the finest dinner a cook ever conceived would be

wasted on him. A single course of the plainest food suffices his

appetite, and he grows manifestly uneasy when faced with a long meal.

His pipe, his one relaxation, never far absent, seems to draw him with a

magic attraction. As it was, his physical resources stood perhaps the

greatest strain that has been imposed on any public man in our time.

From the moment when he joined the first Coalition Government in 1915 to

the day when he laid down office in 1921 he was beset by cares and

immersed in labours which would have overwhelmed almost any other man.

Neither this nor succeeding Coalition Governments were popular with a

great section of his Conservative followers, and to the task of taking

decisions on the war was added the constant and irritating necessity of

keeping his own supporters in line with the administration. In 1916 he

had to take the vital decision which displaced Mr. Asquith in favour of

Mr. Lloyd George, and during the latter's Premiership he had to suffer

the strain of constantly accommodating himself, out of a feeling of

personal loyalty, to methods which were not congenial to his own nature.

In the face of all these stresses he never would take a holiday, and

nothing except the rigid moderation of his life enabled him to keep the

cool penetration of his judgment intact and his physical vigour going

during those six terrible years.

The Lord Chancellor might appear to be an exception to the rule. This is

very far from being the case. It is true that his temperament knows no

mean either in work or play. One of the most successful speeches he ever

delivered in the House of Commons was the fruit of a day of violent

exercise, followed by a night of preparation, with a wet towel tied

round the head. And yet he appeared perfectly fresh; he has the

priceless asset of the most marvellous constitution in the British

Empire. Kipling's poem on France suggests an adaptation to describe the

Lord Chancellor:

"Furious in luxury, merciless in toil,

Terrible with strength renewed from a tireless soil."

No man has spent himself more freely in the hunting-field or works

harder to-day at games. Yet, with all this tendency to the extreme of

work and play, he is a man of iron resolution and determined

self-control. Although the most formidable enemy of the Pussyfooters and

the most powerful protector of freedom in the social habits of the

people that the Cabinet contains, he is, like Mr. Bonar Law, a

teetotaler. It is this capacity for governing himself which is pointing

upwards to still greater heights of power.

Mr. McKenna is, perhaps, the most striking instance of what

determination can achieve in the way of health and physique. His rowing

Blue was the simple and direct result of taking pains--in the form of a

rowing dummy in which he practised in his own rooms. The achievement

was typical of a career which has in its dual success no parallel in

modern life. There have been many Chancellors of the Exchequer and many

big men in the City. That a man, after forcing his way to the front in

politics, should transfer his activities to the City and become in a

short four years its most commanding figure is unheard of. And Mr.

McKenna had the misfortune to enter public life with the handicap of a

stutter. He set himself to cure it by reading Burke aloud to his family,

and he cured it. He was then told by his political friends that he spoke

too quickly to be effective. He cured himself of this defect too, by

rehearsing his speeches to a time machine--an ordinary stop-watch, not

one of the H.G. Wells' variety. Indeed, if any man can be said to have

"made himself," it is Mr. McKenna. He bridges the gulf between politics

and the City, and brings one to a final instance of the purely business

man.

Mr. Gordon Selfridge is an exemplar of the simple life practical in the

midst of unbounded success. He goes to his office every morning

regularly at nine o'clock. In the midst of opulence he eats a frugal

lunch in a room which supplies the one thing of which he is

avaricious--big windows and plenty of fresh air. For light and air spell

for him, as for the rest of us, health and sound judgment. He possesses,

indeed, one terrible and hidden secret--a kind of baron's castle

somewhere in the heart of South England, where he may retire beyond the

pursuit of King or people, and hurl his defiance from its walls to all

the intruders which threaten the balance of the mind. No one has yet

discovered this castle, for it exists only on paper. When Mr. Gordon

Selfridge requires mental relaxation, he may be found poring over the

plans which are to be the basis of this fairy edifice. Moat and parapet,

tower, dungeon, and drawbridge, are all there, only awaiting the Mason

of the future to translate them into actuality. But the success of Mr.

Selfridge lies in his frugality, and not in his dreams. One can afford

to have a castle in Spain when one possesses the money to pay for it.

It is the complexity of modern life which enforces moderation. Science

has created vast populations and huge industries, and also given the

means by which single minds can direct them. Invention gives these

gifts, and compels man to use them. Man is as much the slave as the

master of the machine, as he turns to the telephone or the telegram. In

this fierce turmoil of the modern world he can only keep his judgment

intact, his nerves sound, and his mind secure by the process of

self-discipline, which may be equally defined as restraint, control, or

moderation. This is the price which must be paid for the gifts the gods

confer.

V

MONEY

Many serious letters and a half-humorous criticism in _Punch_ suggest

that I am to be regarded as the apostle of a pure materialism. That is

not so. I quite recognise the existence of other ambitions in the walks

of Art, Religion, or Literature. But at the very outset I confined the

scope of my advice to those who wish to triumph in practical affairs. I

am talking to the young men who want to succeed in business and to build

up a new nation. Criticism based on any other conception of my purpose

is a spent shaft.

Money--the word has a magical sound. It conjures up before the vision

some kind of enchanted paradise where to wish is to have--Aladdin's lamp

brought down to earth.

Yet in reality money carries with it only two qualities of value: the

character it creates in the making; the self-expression of the

individuality in the use of it, when once it has been made. The art of

making money implies all those qualities--resolution, concentration,

economy, self-control--which make for success and happiness. The power

of using it makes a man who has become the captain of his own soul in

the process of its acquirement also the master of the circumstances

which surround him. He can shape his immediate world to his own liking.

Apart from these two faculties, character in acquirement, power in use,

money has little value, and is just as likely to be a curse as a

blessing. For this reason the money master will care little for leaving

vast wealth to his descendants. He knows that they would be better men

for going down stripped into the struggle, with no inheritance but that

of brains and character. Wealth without either the wish, the brains, or

the power to use it is too often the medium through which men pamper the

flesh with good living, and the mind with inanity, until death,

operating through the liver, hurries the fortunate youth into an early

grave. The inheritance tax should have no terrors for the millionaire.

The value of money is, therefore, first in the striving for it and then

in the use of it. The ambition itself is a fine one--but how is it to be

achieved?

I would lay down certain definite rules for the guidance of the young

man who, starting with small things, is determined to go on to great

ones:--

1. The first key which opens the door of success is the trading

instinct, the knowledge and sense of the real value of any article.

Without it a man need not trouble to enter business at all, but if

he possesses it even in a rudimentary form he can cultivate it in

the early days when the mind is still plastic, until it develops

beyond all recognition. When I was a boy I knew the value in

exchange of every marble in my village, and this practice of valuing

became a subconscious habit until, so long as I remained in

business, I always had an intuitive perception of the real and not

the face value of any article.

The young man who will walk through life developing the capacity for

determining values, and then correcting his judgments by his

information, is the man who will succeed in business.

2. But supposing that a young man has acquired this sense of

values, he may yet ruin himself before he comes to the fruition of

his talent if he will not practise economy. By economy I mean the

economic conduct of his business. Examine your profit and loss

account before you go out to conquer the financial world, and then

go out for conquest--if the account justifies the enterprise. Too

many men spend their time in laying down "pipe-lines" for future

profits which may not arrive or only arrive for some newcomer who

has taken over the business. There is nothing like sticking to one

line of business until you have mastered it. A man who has learned

how to conduct a single industry at a profit has conquered the

obstacles which stand in the way of success in the larger world of

enterprise.

3. Do not try to cut with too wide a swath. This last rule is the

most important of all. Many promising young men have fallen into

ruin from the neglect of this simple principle. It is so easy for

premature ambition to launch men out into daring schemes for which

they have neither the resources nor the experience. Acquire the

knowledge of values, practise economy, and learn to read the minds

of men, and your technique will then be perfected and ready for use

on wider fields. The instinct for values, the habit of economy, the

technique of business, are only three forms of the supreme quality

of that judgment which is success.

For these reasons it is the first £10,000 which counts. There is the

real struggle, the test of character, and the warranty of success. Youth

and strength are given us to use in that first struggle, and a man must

feel those early deals right down to the pit of his stomach if he is

going to be a great man of business. They must shake the very fibre of

his being as the conception of a great picture shakes an artist. But the

first ten thousand made, he can advance with greater freedom and take

affairs in his stride. He will have the confidence of experience, and

can paint with a big brush because all the details of affairs are now

familiar to his mentality. With this assured technique nothing will

check the career. "Why," says the innkeeper in an adaptation from

Bernard Shaw's sketch of Napoleon in Italy, "conquering countries is

like folding a tablecloth. Once the first fold is made, the rest is

easy. Conquer one, conquer all."

Such in effect is the career of the great captains of industry. Yet the

man who attains, by the practice of these rules, a great fortune, may

fail of real achievement and happiness. He may not be able to recognise

that the qualities of the aspirant are not exactly the qualities of the

man who has arrived. The sense of general responsibility must supersede

the spirit of private adventure.

The stability of credit becomes the watchword of high finance. Thus the

great money master will not believe that periods of depression are of

necessity ruinous. It is true that no great profits will be made in such

years of depression. But the lean years will not last for ever. Industry

during the period of deflation goes through a process like that of an

over-fat man taking a Turkish bath. The extravagances are eliminated,

new invention and energy spring up to meet the call of necessity, and

when the boom years come again it finds industry, like a highly trained

athlete, ready to pour out the goods and pay the wages. Economic

methods are nurtured by depression.

But when all has been said and done, the sceptic may still question us.

Is the capacity to make money something to be desired and striven for,

something worth having in the character, some proof of ability in the

mind? The answer is "Yes."

Money which is striven for brings with it the real qualities in life.

Here are the counters which mark character and brains. The money brain

is, in the modern world, the supreme brain. Why? Because that which the

greatest number of men strive for will produce the fiercest competition

of intellect. Politics are for the few; they are a game, a fancy, or an

inheritance. Leaving out the man of genius who flares out, perhaps, once

or twice in a century, the amount of ability which enables a man to cut

a very respectable figure in a Cabinet is extraordinarily low, compared

with that demanded in the world of industry and finance. The politician

will never believe this, but it is so.

The battles of the market-place are real duels, on which realities of

life and death and fortune or poverty and even of fame depend. Here men

fight with a precipice behind them, not a pension of £2,000 a year. The

young men who go down into that press must win their spurs by no man's

favour. But youth can triumph; it has the resolution when the mind is

still plastic to gain that judgment which experience gives.

My advice to the young men of to-day is simply this: Money is nothing

but the fruit of resolution and intellect applied to the affairs of the

world. To an unshakable resolution fortune will oppose no bar.

VI

EDUCATION

A great number of letters have reached me from young men who seem to

think that the road to success is barred to them owing to defects in

their education. To them I would send this message:

Never believe that success cannot come your way because you have

not been educated in the orthodox and regular fashion.

The nineteenth century made a god of education, and its eminent men

placed learning as the foremost influence in life.

I am bold enough to dissent, if by education is meant a course of study

imposed from without. Indeed, such a course may be a hindrance rather

than a help to a man entering on a business career. No young man on the

verge of life ought to be in the least discouraged by the fact that he

is not stamped with the hall mark of Oxford or Cambridge.

Possibly, indeed, he has escaped a grave danger; for if, in the

impressionable period of youth, attention is given to one kind of

knowledge, it may very likely be withdrawn from another. A life of

sheltered study does not allow a boy to learn the hard facts of the

world--and business is concerned with reality. The truth is that

education is the fruit of temperament, not success the fruit of

education. What a man draws into himself by his own natural volition is

what counts, because it becomes a living part of himself. I will make

one exception in my own case--the Shorter Catechism, which was acquired

by compulsion and yet remains with me.

My own education was of a most rudimentary description. It will be

difficult for the modern English mind to grasp the parish of Newcastle,

New Brunswick, in the 'eighties--sparse patches of cultivation

surrounded by the virgin forest and broken by the rush of an immense

river. For half the year the land is in the iron grip of snow and frost,

and the Miramichi is frozen right down to its estuary--so that "the

rain is turned to a white dust, and the sea to a great green stone."

It was the seasons which decided my compulsory education. In the winter

I attended school because it was warm inside, and in the summer I spent

my time in the woods because it was warm outside.

Perhaps the most remarkable instance of what self-education can do is to

be found in the achievements of Mr. J.L. Garvin. He received no formal

education at all in the public school or university sense, and he began

to work for his living at an early age. Yet, not only is he, perhaps,

the most eminent of living journalists, but his knowledge of books is,

if not more profound than that of any other man in England, certainly

wider in range, for it is not limited to any country or language. By his

own unaided efforts he has gained not only knowledge, but style and

judgment. To listen to his talk on literature is not merely to yield

oneself to the spell of the magician, but to feel that the critic has

got his estimate of values right.

Reading, indeed, is the real source both of education and of style.

Read what you like, not what somebody else tells you that you ought to

like. That reading alone is valuable which becomes part of the reader's

own mind and nature, and this can never be the case if the matter is not

the result of self-selection, but forced on the student from outside.

Read anything and read everything--just as a man with a sound digestion

and a good appetite eats largely and indifferently of all that is set

before him. The process of selection and rejection, or, in other words,

of taste, will come best and naturally to any man who has the right kind

of brains in his head. Some books he will throw away; others he will

read over and over again. My education owes much to Scott and Stevenson,

stealthily removed from my father's library and read in the hayloft when

I should have been in school.

As a partiality for the right kind of literature grows on a man he is

unconsciously forming his mind and his taste and his style, and by a

natural impulse and no forced growth the whole world of letters is his.

There are, of course, in addition, certain special branches of

education needing teaching which are of particular value to the business

life.

Foremost among these are mathematics and foreign languages. It is not

suggested that a knowledge of the higher mathematics is essential to a

successful career; none the less it is true that the type of mind which

takes readily to mathematics is the kind which succeeds in the realm of

industry and finance.

One of the things I regret is that my business career was shaped on a

continent which speaks one single language for commercial purposes from

the Arctic Circle to the Gulf of Mexico. Foreign languages are,

therefore, a sealed book to me. But if a man can properly appraise the

value of something he does not possess, I would place a knowledge of

languages high in the list of acquirements making for success.

Success (Second Edition) · 第 1 / 4 段