Again,--

"'I should rather be in prison, than to sit up nights studying as you

do.'

"'I really enjoy it, David.'

"'I can hardly credit it.'

"'Then you think I do not speak the truth?'

"'Oh, no!... I only meant to say that I cannot understand it.'

"Allusion is here made to an important fact. David could not understand

how Abraham could possess such a love of knowledge as to lead him to

forego all social pleasures, be willing to wear a threadbare coat, live

on the coarsest fare, and labor hard all day, and sit up half the night,

for the sake of learning. But there is just that power in the love of

knowledge, and it was this that caused Lincoln to derive happiness from

doing what would have been a source of misery to David. Some of the most

marked instances of self-forgetfulness recorded are connected with the

pursuit of knowledge. Archimedes was so much in love with the studies of

his profession, that, etc., etc. Professor Heyne, of Goettingen," etc.,

etc., etc.--A clearer explanation than this we have rarely met with

outside the realm of mathematical demonstration.

A shorter example of the same judicious oversight we have when "in

rushed Nat, under great excitement, with his eyes 'as large as saucers,'

to use a hyperbole, which means only that his eyes looked very large

indeed." The impression which would have been made upon the rising

generation, had the testimony been allowed to go forth without its

corrective, that upon a certain occasion _any_ Governor's eyes were

really as large as saucers, even very small tea-saucers, is such as the

imagination refuses to dwell on.

This exuberance of illustration increases the value of these books in

another respect. To use a homely phrase, we get more than we bargained

for. Ostensibly engaged with the life of the Bobbin Boy, we are covertly

introduced to the majority of all the boys that ever were born and came

to anything. The advertised story is a kind of mother-hen who gathers

under her wings a numerous brood of biographical chicks. Quantities of

recondite erudition are poured out on the slightest provocation. Nat's

unquestioned superiority to his schoolmates evokes a disquisition for

the encouragement of dull boys, in which we are told that "the great

philosopher, Newton, was one of the dullest scholars in school when he

was twelve years old. Doctor Isaac Barrow was such a dull, pugnacious,

stupid fellow, etc., etc. The father of Doctor Adam Clarke, the

commentator, called his boy, etc. Cortina," (vernacular for Cortona,

probably,) "a renowned painter, was nicknamed, etc., etc. When the

mother of Sheridan once, etc., etc. One teacher sent Chatterton home,

etc. Napoleon and Wellington, etc., etc. And Sir Walter Scott was

named," etc., etc., etc. All of which makes very pleasantly diversified

reading. Nat's kindness of heart paves the way to our learning, that,

"at the age of ten or twelve years, John Howard, the philanthropist, was

not distinguished above the mass of boys around him, except for the

kindness of his heart, and boyish deeds of benevolence. It was so with

Wilberforce, whose efforts, etc., etc., etc. And Buxton, whose

self-sacrificing heart," etc., etc. While Nat is swimming four rods

under water, we on shore are acquiring useful knowledge of the

Rothschilds, of Samuel Budget, Sir Joshua Reynolds, Buxton again, Sir

Walter Scott again, and the Duke of Wellington again. Nat walks to

Prospect Hill, and is attended by a suite consisting of Sir Francis

Chantrey, "the gifted poet Burns," "the late Hugh Miller," etc., who

also loved to look at prospects. Nat organized a debating-society,

(which by the way was, "in respect of unanimity of feeling and action, a

lesson to most legislative bodies, and to the Congress of the United

States in particular." Congress of the United States, are you

listening?) and "such an organization has proved a valuable means of

improvement to many persons." Witness "the Irish orator, Curran," with

biography; "a living American statesman," with biography; the "highly

distinguished statesman, Canning," more biography; "Henry Clay, the

American orator," with autobiography; and a meteoric shower of lesser

biographies emanating from Tremont Temple. Nat carried a book in his

pocket, and "Pockets have been of great service to self-made men. A more

useful invention was never known, and hundreds are now living who will

have occasion to speak well of pockets till they die, because they were

so handy to carry a book. Roger Sherman had one when he was a

hard-working shoemaker, etc., etc., etc. Napoleon had one in which he

carried the Iliad when, etc. etc., etc. Hugh Miller had one, etc., etc.,

etc. Elihu Burritt had one," etc., etc., for three pages, to which we

might add, from the best authority, the striking fact which our author,

notwithstanding the wide range of his reading, seems unaccountably to

have missed,--

"Lyddy Locket lost her pocket,

Lyddy Fisher found it,

Lyddy Fisher gave it to Mr. Gaines,

And Mr. Gaines ground it."

The Atlantic Monthly, Volume 14, No. 85, November, 1864 A Magazine of Literature, Art, and Politics · 第 34 / 67 题