In the larger cities throughout the country the encroachments of the

money-makers have been steady. Performances of all kinds are permitted,

theaters run either openly or with thinly veiled programs, saloons are

open to those who know where the proper entrances are, and many forms of

business and labor are carried on seven days in the week. The Jews

claimed that it was a hardship to have to close on Sunday, when their

religious observances came on Saturday, with result that a good many

manage to keep shops and factories open all the year around. Pleas of

necessity have been put forward where contractors desired to push jobs

and profits. Sunday excursions are universal, and in order to gain their

Sunday pleasure-outings several millions of people of all races keep

several other millions hard at work on the day of rest. All places are

crowded on Sunday except the churches. Go among the foreign elements in

the city and you would never know it was Sunday. Holiday has supplanted

holy-day. Observe the trolley-cars or subway or elevated trains on

Sunday and you will see nine foreigners out of every ten persons. Go

into the suburbs and you will find springing up in out-of-the-way

places, where land can be secured cheap, little recreation parks, with

games and dancing platforms; and here there will be throngs of Italians

and other foreigners all day.

[Sidenote: Loss of the American Sunday]

Let us be just in this matter. The loss of the American Sunday is

undoubtedly due in great measure to immigration; due in part to the

weakness and dereliction of American professing Christians who have

surrendered to the foreign elements and fallen in with their ideas

instead of maintaining public worship and insisting upon respect for law

at least. Let the blame fall where it belongs, and let the Church

members recreant to duty take their share. When the sea threatened

Holland her resolute people built the dykes and maintained them;

American Christians have failed to stop the leaks in the church dykes,

and we have had a Sunday submergence in consequence. The effect of it

upon our national development is already evident and is most disastrous

to our highest interests. Sabbath-breaking and progress-making never go

together. Sunday work and pleasure combined form the peril alike of the

American workingman and of Christian civilization.

[Sidenote: General Deterioration]

Along with this inflow of alien ideas in religion goes a lowered

morality and a lower tone generally. Not that the sins of those in high

places are to be charged upon the poor immigrant, for he rarely if ever

belongs to that class. The statement may be true that the great rascals

are of native stock. But that only increases the peril. The masses that

come to us from southern Europe certainly will not raise the moral or

commercial, any more than they will the political or intellectual,

level. If we do not raise them they will tend to lower us; and much of

what they see and hear can have nothing less than a demoralizing effect.

[Sidenote: The Only Safeguard of Liberty]

Where shall we find the zealous and consistent Christians who by

sympathetic contact will represent the true spirit of Christianity, and

make the elevation of the aliens possible? The supreme truth to be

realized is that nothing but Christianity, as incarnated in American

Protestantism, can preserve America's free institutions.

[Sidenote: Spread of Socialism]

Ex-President Seelye, of Amherst, said that socialism is the question of

the time, and this is more apparent with every passing year. Socialism

has its source in the foreign element. It is not native to America. Its

swelling hosts are composed almost entirely of immigrants of recent

coming. It is found not only in the great cities but is spreading

through the farming sections. Now, there is a truth in socialism that

must be intelligently dealt with; and there is a Christian socialism

that should become dominant. And this is the only force that can check

and counteract the foreign socialism that would sweep away foundations

instead of ameliorating conditions and remedying evils.

[Sidenote: Migration a Severe Test]

In the same way, Protestant Christianity is the only agency that can

save us from the moral degeneracy involved in migration, even if the

immigrants were of our moral grade before coming. As Dr. Strong says,

the very act of migration is demoralizing. All the strength that comes

from associations, surroundings, relations, the emigrant leaves behind

him, and becomes isolated in a strange land. Is it strange, then, that

those who come from other lands, whose old associations are all broken

and whose reputations are left behind, should sink to a lower moral

level? Across the sea they suffered restraints which are here removed.

Better wages afford larger means of self-indulgence; often the back is

not strong enough to bear prosperity, and liberty too often lapses into

license.[85]

[Sidenote: Why Foreign Colonies are Perpetuated]

This result of migration is at once an evil and an opportunity. Breaking

away from the old associations leaves room and necessity for new ones.

Upon the character of these the future of the immigrant will largely

depend. Here is the Christian opportunity. See to it that the new

associations make for righteousness and patriotism. If the immigrant is

evangelized, assimilation is easy and sure. It is recognition of this

fact that leads the Roman Catholic Church to keep foreign colonies in

America as isolated and permanent as possible. The ecclesiastics realize

that children must be held in the parochial schools, so as to avoid the

Americanization that comes through the public schools, with the

probable loss of loyalty to the Church. The parents equally must be

kept away from the influences that would broaden and enlighten them. Dr.

Strong tells of large colonies in the West, settled by foreigners of one

nationality and religion; "thus building up states within a state,

having different languages, different antecedents, different religions,

different ideas and habits, preparing mutual jealousies, and

perpetuating race antipathies. In New England conventions are held to

which only French-Canadian Roman Catholics are admitted. At such a

convention in Nashua, New Hampshire, attended by eighty priests, the

following mottoes were displayed: 'Our tongue, our nationality, our

religion,' 'Before everything else, let us remain French!'" And it is

well said: "If our noble domain were tenfold larger than it is, it would

still be too small to embrace with safety to our national future, little

Germanies here, little Scandinavias there, and little Irelands yonder."

To-day there are also little Italies and little Hungaries, and a long

list of other races.

_V. The Hopeful Side_

[Sidenote: A Brighter Picture]

Turning to the pleasanter and brighter side of this great question, we

give the encouraging view of one who has spent years among the immigrant

population, studying their environment, conditions, and character, with

view to improving their chances. She says:

"The writer will risk just one generalization which, it is hoped, the

ultimate facts will bear out, that in the case of the new immigration we

shall see a repetition of the story of the old immigrant we are so

familiar with. First comes the ignorant and poor but industrious

peasant, the young man, alone, without wife or family. For a few years

he works and saves, living according to a 'standard of life' which

shocks his older established neighbors, and we may guess would often

shock his people at home. At first he makes plans for going back, sends

his savings home, and perhaps goes back himself. But he usually returns

to this country, with a wife. America has now become his home, savings

are invested here, land is bought, and a little house built. The growing

children are educated in American schools, learn American ways, and

forcibly elevate the 'standard of life' of the family. The second

generation, in the fervor of its enthusiasm for change and progress

becomes turbulent, unruly, and is despaired of.

[Sidenote: The Open Door]

"But out of the chaos emerges a third generation, of creditable

character, from whom much may be expected. Our Austrian, Hungarian, and

Russian newcomers are still in the first and second stages, and there

seems no good reason why they should not pull through successfully to

the third. But in that endeavor we can either help or materially hinder

them, according to our treatment of them, as employees, as producers,

as fellow citizens. America, for her own sake, owes to the immigrant not

only the opportunities for 'life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness'

that she promises to every man, but a sympathetic appreciation of his

humanity, and an intelligent assistance in developing it."[86]

[Sidenote: How the Children Lead]

This is a picture of progress in assimilation to be remembered, and the

conclusion is admirably expressed. Assimilation is made easy when the

wheels of contact are oiled by kindness and sympathy. The children lead

the way to Americanization. Mr. Brandenburg gives this report of a

conversation overheard in an Italian tenement in New York, the parties

being a mother, father, and the oldest of three daughters: "Said the

mother in very forcible Tuscan: 'You shall speak Italian and nothing

else, if I must kill you; for what will your grandmother say when you go

back to the old country, if you talk this pig's English?' 'Aw, g'wan!

Youse tink I'm goin' to talk dago 'n' be called a guinea! Not on your

life. I'm 'n American, I am, 'n you go 'way back an' sit down,' The

mother evidently understood the reply well enough, for she poured forth

a torrent of Italian, and then the father ended matters by saying in

mixed Italian and English: 'Shut up, both of you. I wish I spoke English

like the children do,' Many parents have learned good English in order

to escape being laughed at or despised by their children."[87]

[Sidenote: The Young American]

The language is not classic, but it is that of real life such as these

children have to endure. The rapidity with which foreigners become

Americanized is illustrated, said Dr. Charles B. Spahr, by the

experience of a gentleman in Boston. In his philanthropic work he had

gotten quite a hold on the Italian population. A small boy once asked

him: "Are you a Protestant?" He said "Yes," and the boy seemed

disappointed. But presently he brightened up and said, "You are an

American, aren't you?" "Yes." "So am I!" with satisfaction. Children

become American to the extent that they do not like to have it known

that they have foreign parents. One little girl of German parentage said

of her teacher: "She's a lady--she can't speak German at all." Where

assimilation is slow, it is quite as likely to be the fault of the

natives as of the immigrants, much more likely, indeed. How can he learn

American ways who is carefully and rudely excluded from them? We build a

Chinese wall of exclusiveness around ourselves, our churches, and

communities, and then blame the foreigner for not forcing his way

within.

In a thoughtful treatment of this whole subject, Mr. Sidney Sampson

says:[88]

[Sidenote: The Real Question]

"It has become a pressing and anxious question whether American

institutions, with all their flexibility and their facility of

application to new social conditions, will continue to endure the strain

put upon them by the rapid and ceaseless introduction of foreign

elements, unused, and wholly unused in great measure, to a system of

government radically differing from that under which they have been

educated. Can these diverse elements be brought to work in harmony with

the American Idea? The centuries of subjection to absolutism, or even

despotism, to which the ancestors of many of the immigrant classes have

been accustomed, has formed a type of political character which cannot,

except after long training, be brought into an understanding of, and

sympathy with, republican principles. This is by far the most important

aspect of the question, much more so than questions of industrial

competition."

If the republic will not ultimately endure harm, he believes industrial

questions will slowly but surely right themselves; if otherwise, none

even of the wisest can foresee the result. We give his conclusion:

[Sidenote: Optimism the True View]

"What is to be the outcome of this movement of the nations upon American

political and industrial life is a question which confronts us with a

problem never before presented in the world's history. Upon a review of

the entire situation I think we may be optimists. Notwithstanding all

unfavorable features, there are antagonizing elements constantly at

work, not the less potent because they work silently. We may attach

undue importance to statistics merely.

[Sidenote: Assimilating Agencies]

"Students of the immigration problem do not sufficiently observe the

influences--in fact, the immigrant may not himself be conscious of

them--which year after year tend to adjust his habits of thought and his

political views and actions to his new environment. Freedom of suffrage,

educational advantages, improved industrial conditions, the dignity of

citizenship, equal laws, protection of property--all these nourish in

him an increasing respect for the American system; and we have reason to

believe that, under proper legislation, the combined influence of all

these will in the long run fully neutralize the distinctly unfavorable

results of future immigration."

[Sidenote: Solution by Combined Forces]

With this we are in accord, provided the Christian people of America can

be brought to see and do their whole duty by the aliens. The solution of

the problem demands the combined forces of our educational, social,

political, and evangelical life. In that solution is involved the

destiny of ultimate America.

QUESTIONS FOR CHAPTER VII

AIM: TO REALIZE THE EFFECT OF IMMIGRATION UPON THE NATIONAL

CHARACTER AND OUR INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR IMPROVING

CONDITIONS

I. _Reasons for Concern._

I. * Do you think that immigration makes a very serious problem for

the United States? Why? Mention others who think differently. Why

do you not agree with them?

2. * Are there any foreigners in your neighborhood? What are they

and what can you do for them?

3. Do these immigrants long retain their foreign aspect and ways?

In what respects do they change most quickly?

4. What does Professor Mayo-Smith say about keeping American ideals

intact? Must Protestant Christianity be guarded?

II. _Threatening Changes._

5. In what respects has immigration since 1820 introduced

un-American standards?

6. * Have the average character and the plane of living of the

immigrants been raised or lowered by their coming here? Same as to

wages? As to intelligence?

7. * How are our public schools affected? Is there any menace to

our school system? Can we provide compulsory education for all the

children?

III. _Other Effects._

8. Do these new Americans learn to use the ballot rightly? Can they

learn?

9. Does their coming make genuine Christianity more or less

prominent in the national life? What effect does it have on Sunday

observance? Does it lessen or increase lawbreaking?

IV. _National Bulwarks._

10. What are the safeguards pointed out by Professor Boyesen? By

ex-President Seelye?

11. How can Socialism be met?

12. * Will anything but Christianity effectively guard our

institutions?

13. How far will material improvements help to uplift and

assimilate the newcomers?

14. Do the children learn patriotism from their new country? Do

they keep it when grown up?

15. * Is there good reason for being optimistic? Upon what

condition may we be hopeful?

REFERENCES FOR ADVANCED STUDY.--CHAPTER VII

I. Study further some of the specific effects of the immigrants'

presence.

Warne: The Slav Invasion, V, VI.

Wood: Americans in Process, VII, VIII.

Riis: How the Other Half Lives, XVIII, XXI.

II. What can you learn about the present status of the parochial school

movement, especially in your own vicinity?

Refer to local periodicals and daily papers.

III. Is assimilation of foreigners taking place everywhere, or only in

certain places?

McLanahan: Our People of Foreign Speech, I.

Hall: Immigration, 172, 182.

Wood: Americans in Process, XII.

Strong: The Twentieth Century City, IV.

IV. Are our school facilities, actual or prospective, likely to prove

sufficient for the demands made upon them?

Riis: How the Other Half Lives, XV, XVI.

Wood: Americans in Process, X.

Hunter: Poverty, V.

_The Christian Churches in America stand face to face with a

tremendous task. It is a challenge to their faith, their devotion,

their zeal. The accomplishment of it will mean not only the

ascendancy of Christianity in the homeland, but also the gaining of

a position of vantage for world-wide evangelization._--E. E.

Chivers, D.D.

VIII

THE HOME MISSION OPPORTUNITY

The question of supreme interest to us is the religious question. What

share shall the Church have in making Christian Americans of these

immigrants? How may Church and State work together for the solution of

the problem, on the solution of which very largely the future prosperity

of the State and the Church depends.--_Charles L. Thompson, D.D._

The future success of missions will be largely affected by the success

of the Church in dealing with problems that lie at her very door. The

connection between home and foreign missionary work is living. The

conversion of the world is bound up with the national character of

professedly Christian lands. --_Rev. Herbert Anderson, English

Missionary in India._

"The blood of the people! changeless tide through century, creed, and

race, Still one, as the sweet salt sea is one, though tempered by sun

and place, The same in ocean currents and the same in sheltered seas:

Forever the fountain of common hopes and kindly sympathies.

Indian and Negro, Saxon and Celt, Teuton and Latin and Gaul,

Mere surface shadow and sunshine, while the sounding unifies all!

One love, one hope, one duty theirs! no matter the time or kin,

There never was a separate heart-beat in all the races of men."

VIII

THE HOME MISSION OPPORTUNITY

_I. Alien Accessibility_

[Sidenote: A Unique Mission Field]

"Save America and you save the world." Through immigration the United

States is in a unique sense the most foreign country and the greatest

mission field on the globe. "All peoples that on earth do dwell" have

here their representatives, gathered by a divine ordering within easy

reach of the gospel. Through them the world may be reached in turn.

Every foreigner converted in America becomes directly or indirectly a

missionary agent abroad, spreading knowledge of the truth among his

kindred and tribe.[89] The greatness of the opportunity is the measure

of obligation. God's message to this nation has been thus interpreted:

"Here are all these people; I have taken them from the overcrowded

countries where they were living and sent them to you, that you may mass

your forces and lend a hand to save them." No such opportunity ever came

to a nation before. The Christian church must seize it or sink into

deserved decadence and decay. Only a missionary church can save the

world or justify its own existence. The manner in which American

Christianity deals with the religious problems of immigration will

decide what part America is to play in the evangelization of the nations

abroad.

[Sidenote: The Gospel the Chief Factor]

We have now reached the vital part of our subject. We have learned to

discriminate between peoples and find the good in all of them. We have

seen that assimilation is essential to national soundness and strength.

But we have yet to realize that the most potential factor in

assimilation is not legislation or education but evangelization. There

is no power like the gospel to destroy race antipathies, break down the

bars of prejudice, and draw all peoples into unity, brotherhood, and

liberty--that spiritual freedom wherewith Christ makes free. When

American Protestantism sees in immigration a divine mission none will

discover in it thenceforth a human menace.

[Sidenote: Shall America be kept Christian]

Marvelous mission, involving the destiny of free America. A writer asks,

"Will New England be kept Christian?" and answers, "That depends.

Population is greatly changing. Immigrants from all parts of the world

are here. They will continue to come. Unless they are molded according

to the principles of our religion, they will greatly increase the

irreligious elements of New England, already too large. There is a

religious basis in those who come, but it will require an application of

religious agencies to make them truly Christian citizens."[90] Put

America in place of New England, and the question and answer will be as

pertinent. Shall America be kept Christian? That depends. It depends

upon what American Christians do.

[Sidenote: Immigrants not Evangelical]

Few of the immigrants are evangelical in religion. They know nothing of

our gospel, and little or nothing of the Bible. The religious principles

they have been taught are totally opposed to the spirit of our free

institutions of religion. They know priestly sovereignty but not soul

liberty. They are the creatures of a system, and the system is

thoroughly un-American and inimical to freedom of conscience and

worship. But thousands and tens of thousands of them are out of sorts

with the system and are ready for something better.[91] They have lost

faith in their Church and will lose it in religion unless we teach them

the gospel. To accomplish this result two persons must be changed--the

immigrant and the American. Alien assimilation depends largely upon

American attitude.

[Sidenote: Two Timely Questions]

Two questions confront us squarely as we approach this subject. First,

the common one, What do we think of the immigrant? And second, the less

common but not less important one, What does the immigrant think of us?

It will do us good, as Americans and as Christians, to consider both of

these frankly. Honestly, what is your attitude toward the ordinary

immigrant? Do you want him and his family, if he has one, in your

church? Do you not prefer to have him in a mission by himself? Would you

not rather work for him by proxy than with him in person? Do you not

pull away from him as far as possible if he takes a seat next to you in

the car? Actual contact is apt to mean contamination, germs, physical

ills. He is ignorant and uncultured. You desire his conversion--in the

mission. You wish him well--at a convenient distance. You would much

more quickly help send a missionary to the Chinese in China than be a

missionary to a Chinaman in America, would you not? Think it over,

Christian, and determine your personal relation to the immigrant. Is he

a brother man, or a necessary evil? Will you establish a friendly

relation with him, or hold aloof from him? Does your attitude need to be

changed?

[Sidenote: The Alien Point of View]

What, now, do you suppose this "undesirable" immigrant thinks of America

and Protestant Christianity? What has he reason to think, in the light

of his previous dreams and present realizations? What does Protestant

Christianity do for him from the time he reaches America? What will he

learn of our free institutions--in the tenement slums or labor camps or

from the "bosses" who treat him as cattle--that will teach him to prize

American citizenship, desire religious liberty, or lead a sober,

respectable life? If we are in earnest about the evangelization of the

immigrant we must put ourselves in his place occasionally and get his

point of view. When we think fairly and rightly of the immigrant, and

treat him in real Christian wise, he will soon come to think of us that

our religion is real, and this will be a long step toward the change we

desire him to undergo. We shall never accomplish anything until we

realize that the coming of these alien millions is not accidental but

providential.

_II. Missionary Beginnings_

[Sidenote: Alien Accessibility is Home Mission Possibility]

Aliens or Americans? · 第 13 / 18 段