I had nothing to tell you that was pleasant or important, and

therefore did not write to you for a long time. During these last

weeks I have spun myself into my mass, and yesterday at last I got

it done. I do not know how it will sound, but may say that I have

PRAYED it rather than COMPOSED it. On my return from Hungary in

September, I shall bring you the mass and my symphonic bubbles and

troubles, half of which will by that time be in print. If my scores

should bore you, that will not prevent me from deriving sweetest

enjoyment from your creations, and you must not refuse me the

favour of singing the whole "Rhinegold" and "Valkyrie" to me. In

the meanwhile all other musical things appear to me "stupid stuff."

How do you feel in London?

Troublesome though it may be, one must try to bear the inevitable

and immutable; to take pleasure in it would be a lie.

The English edition of Philistinism is not a whit pleasanter than

the German, and the chasm between the public and ourselves is

equally wide everywhere.

How, in our wretched conditions, could enthusiasm, love, and art

have their true effect?

"Patience and resignation" is our device, and to it we sing

[Here, Liszt illustrates with a music score excerpt]

Pardon me for being your hollow echo, and let us endure what

cannot be cured.

I am very grateful to you for being so kind to Klindworth. In a

few days his cousin will come to London and bring you news of me,

as she has spent the whole winter at Weymar. Your letter about

the sonata has highly delighted me, and you must excuse me for

not having thanked you at once. You are often so near to me that

I almost forget writing to you, and I am seldom at the right

temperature for correspondence. Well, in September I shall be

with you; and (D.V.) we will have some bright, comforting days

together.

Your

F. L.

WEYMAR, May 2nd, 1855.

186.

DEAR POET, DEAR FRIEND,

Our hearts are with you, and suffer with you; that you know, and

cannot be ignorant of.

Let us hear from you soon, and forgive me if, in the midst of the

preoccupations of your heart and of your grief, I ask you for a

trifle; but it will cost you so little to grant it me, and you

will give such great, such very great, pleasure by it. It is the

fate of poets and women sometimes to give what they have not

themselves--I mean happiness. Take a piece of paper and write on

it the following verses, which, as you know, appear to me written

with the purest blood of my veins:-

"Nicht Gut, nicht Gold, noch gottliche Pracht; nicht Haus, nicht

Hof, nicht herrischer Prunk, nicht truber Vertrage trugender

Bund, noch heuchelnder Sitte hartes Gesetz: selig in Lust und

Leid lasst--die Liebe nur sein!--" Sign this with your name, your

great name, enclose it in an envelope, address it to me, and put

it in the post. Forgive me for asking you this small thing--small

in its material aspect, but great as the world in its

significance.

I press your two hands with mine, dear, dear, great man.

CAROLYNE.

May 7th, 1855.

187.

Cordial thanks, dearest Franz, for your kind note, which I had

been expecting a long time. The hope which you open to me of

seeing you in September is my only light in the night of this sad

year. I live here like one of the lost souls in hell. I never

thought that I could sink again so low. The misery I feel in

having to live in these disgusting surroundings is beyond

description, and I now realise that it was a sin, a crime, to

accept this invitation to London, which in the luckiest case must

have led me far away from my real path. I need not expatiate to

you upon my actual situation. It is the consistent outgrowth of

the greatest inconsistency I ever committed. I am compelled to

conduct an English concert programme right down to the end; that

says everything. I have got into the middle of a slough of

conventionalities and customs, in which I stick up to the ears,

without being able to lead into it the least drop of pure water

for my recreation. "Sir, we are not accustomed to this"--that is

the eternal echo I hear. Neither can the orchestra recompense me.

It consists almost exclusively of Englishmen, that is clever

machines which cannot be got into the right swing; handicraft and

business kill everything. Then there is the public, which, I am

assured, is very favourably inclined towards me, but can never be

got out of itself, which accepts the most emotional and the most

tedious things without ever showing that it has received a real

impression. And, in addition to this, the ridiculous Mendelssohn

worship!

And even if all this were better than it is, what business have I

with such concerts? I am not fit for them. It is quite a

different thing if I conduct one of Beethoven's symphonies before

a few friends, but to be a regular concert conductor, before whom

they place the scores of concert pieces, etc., so that he may

beat the time to them--that, I feel, is the deepest disgrace.

This thoroughly inappropriate character of my position led me to

the resolution of sending in my resignation after the fourth

concert. But of course I was talked out of it, and especially my

regard for my wife, who would have heard of this sudden

resignation and of all that would have been written about it with

great grief, determined me to hold out till the last concert. The

infernal torture this is to me I cannot express. All my pleasure

in my work is disappearing more and more. I had made up my mind

to finish the score of the "Valkyrie" during the four months

here, but that is out of the question. I shall not even finish

the second act, in so terribly dispiriting a manner does this

false position act upon me. In July I wanted to begin "Young

Siegfried" at Seelisberg, on the lake of Lucerne, but now I think

of delaying that beginning till next spring. This dislike of work

is the worst feature of all. I feel as if with it eternal night

were closing around me, for what have I still to do in this world

if I cannot do my work?

Through this hell my study of Dante, to which I could not settle

down before, has accompanied me. I have passed through his

Inferno, and am now at the gate of Purgatory. Really I am in need

of this purgatory; for if I consider it rightly, I was brought to

London by a really sinful degree of thoughtlessness, which now I

have to repent with fervour. I must, I must be resigned; my

experience long ago convinced me of the necessity of resignation

in the widest sense of the word, and I must now subdue altogether

this terrible, wild desire of life, which again and again dims my

vision and throws me into a chaos of contradictions. I must hope

that I may at some future time rise from purgatory to paradise;

the fresh air of my Seelisberg will perhaps help me to this. I do

not deny that I should like to meet Beatrice there.

In all other respects things are going badly and crookedly. Poor

Klindworth has been ill all along, and the fact that I could

undertake nothing with him has deprived me of a great pleasure.

He is better now, but not yet allowed to take a walk with me.

Besides him, my intercourse is limited to Sainton, the leader of

the orchestra, who caused my ill-fated appointment here, and a

certain Luders, who lives with him. Both are ardently devoted to

me, and do all in their power to make my stay here pleasant.

Apart from this, I frequently go to Prager. Quite recently a Mr.

Ellerton, a rich amateur, approached me very cordially. He has

heard my operas in Germany, and my portrait has been hanging in

his room for two years. He is the first Englishman I have seen

who does not care particularly for Mendelssohn. A fine, amiable

mind.

Klindworth has made the pianoforte arrangement of the first act

of the "Valkyrie," which he plays beautifully. Unfortunately I

have lost my voice entirely, and can sing very little, so that I

am afraid I shall not be able to be of much service to you in

that way.

You will have to do all the work next September. You owe me a

great debt, you reticent man. If I look forward to anything in

the future as pure happiness, it is my becoming acquainted

through your means with your new compositions. Do not forget to

bring me every one of them. I congratulate you on your mass from

the bottom of my heart. Let us hope that you will derive much

pleasure from it at Gran.

And how is the Princess? Joyful and sorrowful? Does she still

preserve her bright enthusiasm? And Beatrice--I mean the Child?

Greet her for me a thousand times.

Farewell, dearest, most unique of friends. Believe me that the

thought of you is an ever-new delight to my heart. Be thanked for

your love!

Farewell.

Your

R. W.

LONDON, May 16th, 1855.

188.

22, PORTLAND TERRACE, REGENT'S PARK, LONDON,

May 26th, 1855.

Once more, dearest Franz, I must make a complaint about the

"Faust" overture. The Hartels have sent me an abominable

arrangement for four hands, of which I cannot possibly approve.

Did not you tell them that B., who, I believe, had already made a

be ginning, would best be able to make this arrangement?

Klindworth also would be prepared for it. In any case it should

be a pianist of that type. The actual arrangement, which I

yesterday returned to the Hartels through a music-seller, must

not appear.

However, some wrong notes in this arrangement have drawn my

attention to the fact that very probably there are many errors in

the score as well. You will remember that it was a copy which I

sent to you for your own use, asking you to correct such errors

as might occur in your mind, or else to have them corrected,

because it would be tedious for me to revise the copy. For the

same reason I urgently requested the Hartels, if they printed the

score, to send me a proof. You are in frequent communication with

the Hartels, and the edition of this overture is really your

doing. Be not angry therefore if I ask you to set the matter

completely right when convenient. For heaven's sake, forgive me

for troubling you with this trifle. The day after tomorrow I have

my sixth concert, and a month afterwards I start for home.

Shall I hear from you soon?

A thousand greetings.

Your R. W.

189. DEAREST RICHARD,

I returned here yesterday from the Dusseldorf Musical Festival,

tired and dull. Hiller, who conducted the whole, had invited me,

and it interested me to go through the whole thing for once, to

hear "Paradise and the Peri," and to applaud Jenny Lind. I need

not tell YOU anything about it, and I am not much the wiser

myself. Although the whole festival may be called a great

success, it wanted something which, indeed, could not have been

expected from it. In the art world there are very different kinds

of laurels and thistles, but you need care very little about

such. "The eagle flies to the sun."

Then you are reading Dante? He is excellent company for you. I,

on my part, shall furnish a kind of commentary to his work. For a

long time I had in my head a Dante symphony, and in the course of

this year it is to be finished. There are to be three movements,

HELL, PURGATORY, and PARADISE, the two first purely instrumental,

the last with chorus. When I visit you in autumn, I shall

probably be able to bring it with me; and if you do not dislike

it, you must allow me to inscribe it with your name.

With the Hartels little can be done. If the arrangement for four

hands of the Faust overture has already been made, I do not

advise you to propose some one else. The only thing that can be

done with the four-hand arrangement is to ask Klindworth to make

some corrections in accordance with your instructions, and to

have some of the plates newly engraved without mentioning

Klindworth's name on the title-page. Another time it would be a

practical thing to send in the four-hand arrangement together

with the score, and to come to terms with the publisher about it.

The attitude of the Hartels towards us is naturally always a

little reserved. I, for my part, cannot complain of them, and

they have always treated me in a decent and gentlemanly manner.

But I should not rely upon them for many things, because their

intimate friends are decidedly adverse to us; and for the present

we shall not be able to arrive at more than a peaceful, expectant

footing with them. Although this may sometimes be inconvenient, I

think it best to let it continue.

I am surprised that you found so many mistakes in the proofs of

the "Faust" score, for, amongst other advantages which they

possess as publishers, one is bound in justice to admit that the

Hartels have excellent readers (Dorffel, Schellenberg, etc.).

Therefore use time and patience in correcting, and where

necessary let the plates be engraved over again.

When shall you be back in Zurich? At Dusseldorf they were saying

that you had already left London, and jealous Philistia received

the news with a joy which I was not sorry to spoil. Whatever may

happen, and however it may happen, I implore you to

"Hold out and persevere."

In your capacity of poeta sovrano, you must, as Dante says of

Homer, pass on your way quietly and undisturbedly, si come sire.

All this dirt does not touch you. Write your "Nibelungen," and be

content to live on as an immortal!

Later on I shall ask Klindworth to let me see the pianoforte

arrangement of the first act of the "Valkyrie." How about that of

the "Rhinegold?" Has H. kept it? Write to me about it, so that I

may know how to get at it.

I have advised H. to settle in Berlin, where his position at the

music school will be very useful to him. There is not much to be

got by travelling about in our days. Later on he may go to Paris

and London, but for the next few years Berlin will be a good

field for his activity.

I shall stay here during the summer, until I start for Gran at

the end of August. The musical task which occupies me is a new

and considerably altered score of my choruses to "Prometheus,"

which I want to publish next winter. As soon as it is finished I

shall return to my Dante symphony, which has partly been

sketched.

Farewell, dearest, most unique of friends, and write soon to your

serf, body and soul,

F. L.

WEYMAR, June 2nd, 1855.

The Princess and the Child send cordial greetings.

190.

Let me express to you, best of men, my astonishment at your

ENORMOUS PRODUCTIVENESS. You have a Dante symphony in your head,

have you? And it is to be finished in the autumn? Do not be

annoyed by my astonishment at this miracle. When I look back upon

your activity in these last years, you appear superhuman to me;

there is something very strange about this. However, it is very

natural that creating is our only joy, and alone makes life

bearable to us. We are what we are only while we create; all the

other functions of life have no meaning for us, and are at bottom

concessions to the vulgarity of ordinary human existence, which

can give us no satisfaction. All that I still desire in this

world is a favourable mood and disposition for work, and I find

it difficult enough to protect these from the attack of

vulgarity. It is the same thing with you. But what astonishes me

and appears worthy of envy is that you can create so much.

A "Divina Commedia" it is to be? That is a splendid idea, and I

enjoy the music in anticipation. But I must have a little talk

with you about it. That "Hell" and "Purgatory" will succeed I do

not call into question for a moment, but as to "Paradise" I have

some doubts, which you confirm by saying that your plan includes

choruses. In the Ninth Symphony the last choral movement is

decidedly the weakest part, although it is historically

important, because it discloses to us in a very naive manner the

difficulties of a real musician who does not know how (after hell

and purgatory) he is to represent paradise. About this paradise,

dearest Franz, there is in reality a considerable difficulty, and

he who confirms this opinion is, curiously enough, Dante himself,

the singer of Paradise, which in his "Divine Comedy" also is

decidedly the weakest part. I have followed Dante with deepest

sympathy through the "Inferno" and the "Purgatorio;" and when I

emerged from the infernal slough, I washed myself, as does the

poet, with the water of the sea at the foot of the Mountain of

Purgatory. I enjoyed the divine morning, the pure air. I rose

step by step, deadened one passion after the other, battled with

the wild instinct of life, till at last, arrived at the fire, I

relinquished all desire of life, and threw myself into the glow

in order to sink my personality in the contemplation of Beatrice.

But from this final liberation I was rudely awakened to be again,

after all, what I had been before, and this was done in order to

confirm the Catholic doctrine of a God Who, for His own

glorification, had created this hell of my existence, by the most

elaborate sophisms and most childish inventions, quite unworthy

of a great mind. This problematic proof I rejected from the

bottom of my soul, and remained dissatisfied accordingly. In

order to be just to Dante I had, as in the case of Beethoven, to

occupy the historic standpoint; I had to place myself in Dante's

time and consider the real object of his poem, which, no doubt,

was intended to advocate a certain thing with his contemporaries-

-I mean the reform of the Church. I had to confess that in this

sense he understood marvellously well his advantage of expressing

himself in an infallible manner through means of popular and

generally accepted ideas. Before all, I cordially agreed with him

in his praise of the saints who had chosen poverty of their own

free-will. I had further to admire even in those sophisms his

high poetic imagination and power of representation, just as I

admire Beethoven's musical art in the last movement of his "Ninth

Sympthony." I had further to acknowledge, with deepest and most

sublime emotion, the wonderful inspiration through means of which

the beloved of his youth, Beatrice, takes the form in which he

conceives the Divine doctrine; and in so far as that doctrine

teaches the purification of personal egoism through love, I

joyfully acknowledge the doctrine of Beatrice. But the fact that

Beatrice stands, as it were, on the chariot of the Church, that,

instead of pure, simple doctrine, she preaches keen-witted

ecclesiastic scholasticism, made her appear to me in a colder

light, although the poet assures us that she shines and glows for

ever. At last she became indifferent to me; and although as a

mere reader I acknowledge that Dante has acted appropriately, in

accordance with his time and his purpose, I should as a

sympathetic co-poet have wished to lose my personal

consciousness, and indeed all consciousness, in that fire. In

that manner I should, no doubt, have fared better than even in

the company of the Catholic Deity, although Dante represents it

with the same art with which you, no doubt, will endeavour to

celebrate it in your choruses. I faithfully record to you the

impression which the "Divine Comedy" has made upon me, and which

in the "Paradise" becomes to my mind a "divine comedy" in the

literal sense of the word, in which I do not care to take part,

either as a comedian or as a spectator. The misleading problem in

these questions is always How to introduce into this terrible

world, with an empty nothing beyond it, a God Who converts the

enormous sufferings of existence into something fictitious, so

that the hoped-for salvation remains the only real and

consciously enjoyable thing. This will do very well for the

Philistine, especially the English Philistine. He makes very good

terms with his God, entering into a contract by which, after

having carried out certain points agreed upon, he is finally

admitted to eternal bliss as a compensation for various failures

in this world. But what have we in common with these notions of

the mob?

You once expressed your view of human nature to the effect that

man is "une intelligence, servie par des organes." If that were

so, it would be a bad thing for the large majority of men, who

have only "organs," but as good as no "intelligence," at least in

your sense. To me the matter appears in a different light, viz.,-

-

Man, like every other animal, embodies the "will of life," for

which he fashions his organs according to his wants; and amongst

these organs he also develops intellect, i.e., the organ of

conceiving external things for the purpose of satisfying the

desire of life to the best of his power. A NORMAL man is

therefore he who possesses this organ, communicating with the

external world (whose function is perception, just as that of the

stomach is digestion) in a degree exactly sufficient for the

satisfaction of the vital instinct by external means. That vital

instinct in NORMAL man consists in exactly the same as does the

vital instinct of the lowest animal, namely, in the desire of

nourishment and of propagation. For this "will of life," this

metaphysical first cause of all existence, desires nothing but to

live--that is, to nourish and eternally reproduce itself--and

this tendency can be seen identically in the coarse stone, in the

tenderer plant, and so forth up to the human animal. Only the

organs are different, of which the will must avail itself in the

higher stages of its objective existence, in order to satisfy its

more complicated, and therefore more disputed and less easily

obtainable, wants. By gaining this insight, which is confirmed by

the enormous progress of modern science, we understand at once

the characteristic feature of the life of the vast majority of

men, and are no longer astonished because they appear to us

simply as animals; for this is the NORMAL essence of man. A very

large portion of mankind remains BELOW this NORMAL stage, for in

them the complicated organ of perception is not developed even up

to the capability of satisfying normal wants; but, on the other

hand, although of course very rarely, there are ABNORMAL natures

in which the ordinary measure of the organ of perception--that

is, the brain--is exceeded, just as nature frequently forms

monstrosities in which ONE ORGAN is developed at the expense of

the others. Such a monstrosity, if it reaches the highest degree,

is called GENIUS, which at bottom is caused only by an abnormally

rich and powerful brain. This organ of perception, which

originally and in normal cases looks outward for the purpose of

satisfying the wants of the will of life, receives in the case of

an abnormal development such vivid and such striking impressions

from outside that for a time it emancipates itself from the

service of the will, which originally had fashioned it for its

own ends. It thus attains to a "will-less"--i.e., aesthetic--

contemplation of the world; and these external objects,

contemplated APART FROM THE WILL, are exactly the ideal images

which the ARTIST in a manner fixes and reproduces. The sympathy

with the external world which is inherent in this contemplation

is developed in powerful natures to a permanent forgetfulness of

the original personal will, that is to a SYMPATHY with external

things for their own sake, and no longer in connection with any

personal interest.

The question then arises what we see in this abnormal state,

and whether our sympathy takes the form of COMMON JOY or COMMON

SORROW. This question the true MEN OF GENIUS and the true SAINTS

of all times have answered in the sense that they have seen

nothing but SORROW and felt nothing but COMMON SORROW. For they

recognized the NORMAL state of all living things and the

terrible, always self-contradictory, always self-devouring and

blindly egotistic, nature of the "will of life" which is common

to all living things. The horrible cruelty of this will, which in

sexual love aims only at its own reproduction, appeared in them

for the first time reflected in the organ of perception, which in

its normal state had felt its subjection to the Will to which it

owed its existence. In this manner the organ of perception was

placed in an abnormal sympathetic condition. It endeavoured to

free itself permanently and finally from its disgraceful serfdom,

and this it at last achieved in the perfect negation of the "will

of life."

Correspondence of Wagner and Liszt — Volume 2 · 第 5 / 20 段