CORRESPONDENCE.

The response by letters showed that Senatorial protest and

newspaper criticism did not prevent the acceptance of the

Resolutions by earnest, thoughtful people, anxious for decisive

measures and a true preparation for the future. Here was a plan

of Reconstruction without Slavery, and this was a wide-spread

longing of hearts.

Hon. John Jay, afterwards Minister at Vienna, wrote from New

York:--

“There is no question about the fact that Slavery in the

Rebel States has ceased to exist, within the meaning and

under the protection of the Constitution.

“I have thought somewhat on the matter, and have just

completed an argument on it, which I proposed to include in

my lecture before the Washington Association. The Southern

States have ceased to be States of the Union; their soil

has become national territory; and the slaves, in the eyes

of the Constitution, are freemen. I wish your resolutions

had been referred to some committee from whom we could have

had a careful report in their favor, even though it were a

minority report, to get the argument before the country.”

Charles T. Rodgers, President of the Young Men’s Republican

Union, wrote from New York:--

“I have just read the preamble and resolutions offered

by you in the Senate, in which you define the position

and status of the revolted States, and of persons held to

service under the laws thereof.

“I cannot refrain from expressing to you, personally, my

pleasure at the fact that the true doctrine on this subject

has been so clearly laid down. I am sure that your theory

is the true one, and, in fact, the only one this Government

can consistently follow, and the only one which seems to

offer a plain path out of the maze of conflicting legal and

constitutional points in which so many of our public men

seem to have become entangled. The States, by seceding,

have committed suicide. The slaves therein are _de facto_

free. Stick to that, and you will come out all right.”

Hon. Charles A. Dana, the accomplished journalist, afterwards

Assistant Secretary of War, wrote:--

“I fully appreciate the difficulty of settling the South

after it is conquered. I don’t see how your plan can be

avoided; _bon gré, mal gré_, it is what we all must come

to.”

Park Benjamin, writer and poet, who had not formerly

sympathized with Mr. Sumner politically, wrote from New York:--

“Your Territorial plan is the only right and just one, let

the short-sighted geese hiss at it as they may.”

Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 08 (of 20) · 第 72 / 125 题