REMARKS IN THE SENATE, FEBRUARY 6, 1862.

The Senate had under discussion an Army Bill, when Mr.

Doolittle, of Wisconsin, moved an amendment reducing and

regulating the mileage of Members of Congress. The remarks of

Mr. Sumner were not addressed to the merits of the question,

but to the impropriety of dealing with it in the pending bill.

MR. PRESIDENT,--It seems clear that the discussion in which we

are launched is a departure from the question before the Senate.

The pending bill is “to define the pay and emoluments of certain

officers of the army, and for other purposes,” and an amendment is

moved to reduce and regulate Congressional mileage. By what process

of association the two are brought together it is not easy to see.

Certainly nobody looking for light on Congressional mileage would think

of exploring our army legislation.

* * * * *

My experience teaches me the advantage, not to say the beauty of order,

in the business of legislation, as in all other business. There is a

proper place for everything, and everything should be in its proper

place. Especially should things plainly incongruous be kept apart, and

without commixture. But what more unreasonable than the commixture

proposed? Each measure may be good in itself, but the two do not go

together. They are without natural or logical connection. One is not

the incident of the other, nor in any respect germane to the other.

They should be in separate bills, and be discussed separately.

Here we are in high debate on the Army Bill, and all at once the

subject is changed, although the original bill is still before the

Senate. But Congressional mileage is enough by itself. Already it

has occupied the attention of the country, has been discussed in the

newspapers, and especially in the other House. It is a Serbonian

bog, not indeed “where armies whole have sunk,” but only Members of

Congress. Are you ready, while considering another question, to revive

this debate, making it the accident of another, with which it has

nothing to do? Is it advisable? Is it according to the natural order of

business?

The Mileage Amendment was adopted, but the bill failed between

the two Houses.

Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 08 (of 20) · 第 65 / 125 题