The _World_, in New York, said:--

“The carefully prepared speech which Mr. Sumner delivered

in the Senate yesterday is an important contribution to

the stock of current information on an important question

of public law. The arrest of Mason and Slidell has not

before been discussed with so much breadth of research.

Mr. Sumner’s luminous speech is a remarkable example of

the advantage of historical knowledge in the discussion of

public questions.…

“It is creditable to Mr. Sumner that he has been able to

present so conclusive an historical argument in opposition

to the view of this subject taken by legists and publicists

so able and erudite as Mr. Everett, Mr. Cushing, Professor

Parsons, and Chief-Justice Bigelow, of his own State, and

most of the public journals in all parts of the country.

The error of these writers has consisted in an undue

deference to the British admiralty decisions,--decisions

against whose validity on the points involved in this

controversy our Government has always protested.

“Mr. Sumner’s argument plainly sustains Mr. Seward in

his surrender of the Rebel commissioners, but not in his

delaying to do so till they were demanded by the English

Government. The thanks of the country are due to Mr. Sumner

for his convincing argument that the national honor has

suffered no detriment by their surrender.”

Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 08 (of 20) · 第 28 / 125 题