CHAPTER XX. -- III.--FROM ALL YOUR STUDY OF HISTORY, WHAT DEDUCTIONS DO

YOU DRAW AS TO THE FINAL DECLINE AND FALL, IF SUCH A THING IS EVER TO

BE, OF THIS REPUBLIC?

|TO the casual reader, the relationship that this question bears to

"Secrets of the Late Rebellion, now Revealed for the First Time,"

may seem very obscure, but to our mind, that sees the end from the

beginning, the relationship seems very close, as our readers will also

see, we think, before we close the answer.

Patrick Henry, in one of his outbursts of eloquence, said he "knew of no

way to judge of the future save by the past." Taking this as our guide,

let us inquire somewhat into the history of former republics, and see

if we cannot gather therefrom some probabilities as to the future of our

own, and some light by which to guide our own footsteps meanwhile. Our

plan and limited space will only permit us to take a bird's-eye view of

four--Athens, Sparta, Thebes, and Rome--but even from these alone we may

learn some useful lessons.

The republic of Athens came into existence immediately after the

voluntary death of King Codrus, about 1068 years before Christ. Codrus

having been made to believe, through an oracle, that if he sacrificed

his own life, his country would be victorious over the Heraclidæ, with

whom they were then engaged in war, disguised himself as a peasant, and,

purposely quarrelling with a soldier of the hostile army, procured the

death he wished. His sons, Medon and Nileus, disputed the succession

to the crown; and the Athenians, taking advantage of this dispute,

determined to set aside the crown altogether, and thenceforth have

a representative or republican form of government. Hence arose the

Athenian Republic. Though they abolished the title of king, out of the

high regard they had for Codrus, they appointed his son Medon chief

magistrate for life, and even made the office hereditary, so that for

three hundred and thirty-one years thereafter the chief magistrate

continued in that family. They then abolished the perpetual archonship,

and made the tenure of the office ten years. This term they reduced

erelong to one year, and, instead of one archon or chief magistrate,

appointed nine, with equal authority. Meanwhile their government became

so purely democratic as to become utterly despotic, and the tyranny of

the mob was found to be more oppressive than the restraints of a

single ruler. Then followed the laws of Draco, which, because of

their severity, were said to have been "written in blood." He made

no distinction of offences, but punished all equally with death. He

weakened the authority of the Areopagus, and instituted a new tribunal,

in which judges were given almost unlimited power, and virtually made

brutes. The severity of his laws defeated their own object.

Such was the condition of things when the great lawmaker, Solon,

appeared on the stage, five hundred and ninety-four years before Christ.

The laws which he framed and gave the Athenians were not, as he said

himself, "the best possible, but the best which the Athenians were

capable of receiving." To the rich he gave offices and dignities; to the

poor he gave the right of suffrage, whereby in the framing of laws,

the election of magistrates, the making of war or peace, the forming

of treaties and alliances, and in all that regarded either religious or

civil policy, they should have an equal voice with the rich, and, being

much the greater in number, their class could overbalance the other

three, though out of their class could no nomination be made to any

office of honor or profit. A senate of four hundred members held an

intermediate place between office-holders and the people, and served as

a restraint upon both. The arbitrary power of the judges, as established

by Draco, Solon restrained, and made the court of Areopagus the chief

judicial tribunal, and gave it also a tutorial power over all the youth

of the republic. Instead of having an egotistical, half-educated state

school superintendent to do such duty (as sometimes found in this

country), this court appointed masters and governors for the youth, and

superintended their education. The Areopagus also inquired into the life

and morals of all who held offices in the state, and such as could not

stand the scrutiny were not only incapacitated for employ, but declared

infamous. His laws also prohibited all imprisonment for debt, and

contained many other provisions in which legislators have made no

improvement during the nearly two thousand five hundred years that have

passed since then.

Notwithstanding the good laws of Solon, then, as now, there were found

men to take advantage of their provisions to gratify their own

private hates. Thus, Solon's laws allowed popular action for most

offences--regarding all offences as against the "peace and dignity of

the state"--as we do now; but in many cases advantage was taken of this

by bad men to make the most calumnious accusations against men whose

character until then had stood even above suspicion. So advantage was

frequently taken of the law of ostracism (which was only meant for

good), whereby some of their very best men were banished from the

state. Thus, when an ignorant citizen was about to cast his vote for the

ostracism of Aristides, he was asked by Aristides himself, who chanced

to be passing by at the moment, and who was unknown t<\ him:

"Why, what harm, my friend, has Aristides done to you?"

"None in the world," replied he; "but I hate to hear everybody call him

the 'Just.'"

Thucydides also, from whom Athens had received the most eminent

services, was in like manner banished by ostracism; as likewise were

Miltiades, Cimon, Themistocles, Phocion, and many other of their most

eminent men. What was meant, too, for religious freedom was made to

subserve (by those who temporarily had the power) the purposes of

religious bigotry, tyranny, and persecution, until even the renowned

philosopher, Socrates, was made to drink the fatal hemlock.

While the great majority of Athenians were entirely satisfied with

their form of government; while the masses were equally jealous of their

liberty, because liberty was equally necessary to each for the enjoyment

of his favorite scheme of life; yet there were those inside of the

republic, as well as outside, who did not like a republican form of

government, and who were all the while watching for an opportunity

to overthrow it Among these was Pisistratus, a man of large wealth,

splendid talents, and of great popularity. He aspired to sovereign

power, and by his artifices came so near in obtaining it, that Solon,

disgusted at the want of patriotism among his countrymen, and unable

to witness its degradation, bade adieu to Athens, and died in voluntary

exile. He--even he, the great and good Solon--was made to feel what it

was to be "a man without a country," and chose to die in exile rather

than to remain in his native land, or even to look upon it again in a

state of degradation.. If the time should ever come (and God only knows

how soon it may come!) when not only one but scores, yea, hundreds, of

American Solons should be wandering throughout the world, without a home

and without a country, because of the destruction of our representative

form of government by European jealousy and Catholic bigotry, then, if

never before, they and all others will fully understand something of the

natural outgrowth of the Democratic party of this country, of which the

late rebellion was the first act in the drama, and of which its secret

workings only represented the machinations of a hundred Pisistratuses!

But though Pisistratus thus usurped power, and for a while played the

sovereign, he was unable to retain it long. Megacles and Lycurgus,

the chiefs of the Alemæonidæ, gained at length so much strength as

to attack and expel the usurper from Athens. By a stratagem he again

secured power, and, on dying, bequeathed the crown to his sons,

Hippias and Hipparchus, but erelong Hipparchus was killed, and Hippias

dethroned, and once again the republic prevailed, and statues were

erected to the honor of Harmodius and Aristogiton as the authors of

their country's deliverance from tyranny.

From thenceforth there was almost a constant warfare between the

political parties or factions of the republic, while jealous eyes

outside were consequently watching an opportunity for its destruction.

Ambitious demagogues were constantly using the people as their tools,

but scarcely would one obtain the chief magistracy until another would

pull him down--if not by a vote of the people, then by faction or by

assassination. Meanwhile Hippias, who had been dethroned, sought aid

from the king of Persia to reinstate him, and thus brought a long and

bloody war upon his own country. In this war were fought the renowned

battles of Marathon, Salamis, Plateæ, and Mycale, and the Greeks came

off victorious, but at a most fearful sacrifice of treasure and life.

After this followed the disunion among the several Grecian states--the

secession of some--the coldness and indifference of others; and though

the brilliant administrations of Cimon and Pericles seemed to revive the

republic for awhile, it was evident to all that the seeds of death were

fast germinating and would bring forth fruit erelong. The Persian king,

and the sovereigns of other surrounding countries, had long felt

deep jealousy of the Athenian Republic, and, when an excuse came for

attacking it, they were not backward in availing themselves of the

opportunity. Fortunately for the Athenian Republic the attack made upon

them by Persia had the effect to bring the whole power of the Spartan

Republic to their aid, which, with such other aid as they received from

minor states of Greece, enabled them to defeat the Persians in the end

and maintain their own independence.

But a worse fate awaited them--namely, a fight among themselves. The

mutual jealousies that had long existed between Athens and Sparta

broke out afresh, and soon terminated in an open war between the two

republics, and most of the minor states of Greece took a part in the

quarrel. The first declaration of hostilities, however, was compromised

before they came to actual conflict; but it proved to be only a

smouldering, and not an extinguishment, of the fire that had long burned

in the breast of each--a fire that afterwards broke forth in what was

known as the "Peloponnesian war," and lasted twenty-eight years. Our

plan and space will not permit any details of this. A history of the

first twenty-two years of the war was admirably written by Thucydides,

and of the last six years by Xenophon, to whom we must refer the reader

who would know its particulars. Suffice it to say here that during this

long internecine war each achieved victories and each suffered defeats.

At one time the Spartans so reduced Athens as to make an entire change

in its constitution. The republic was abolished and thirty governors,

or, as the Greek historians style them, "thirty tyrants" were

substituted, whose power seems to have been absolute, unless in so far

as each was restrained by the equally arbitrary will of his colleagues.

So fearful and terrible was their rule, that Xenophon thinks "a greater

number of Athenian citizens lost their lives by the sentence of these

tyrants, in the short space of eight months, than had fallen in the

whole twenty-eight years of the Peloponnesian war." Hundreds of the most

eminent of the Athenian families left their country in despair, and what

remained were for a time awed into silence, and dumb with consternation.

And just here we may pause to say that precisely the same kind of rule,

and the same kind of results, would have been witnessed in this country,

had the rebellion, by the aid of the Democratic party, succeeded in

capturing Washington and in establishing their rule over this country.

It is one of the "Secrets of the Late Rebellion, now Revealed for the

First Time" (and our information comes from one who was behind the

scenes and knew all about it, and the first sixteen chapters of this

volume entirely confirm this opinion), that behind President Davis and

behind General Lee stood a body of desperate men, who, at one single

sweep, would have wiped them off the chess-board and put others in their

stead, had they shown the least considerate humanity in dealing with

Northern men, in case the rebellion had succeeded. Not Abraham Lincoln

alone would have fallen at the hands of the assassin or hangman, but

thousands of others throughout the North would have suffered a like

fate, until the rule of the "thirty tyrants" in Athens would have been

considered but child's play in comparison with the rule of the more than

three hundred tyrants of this republic. Then would have been witnessed

here, as there, thousands of the most eminent of American

families leaving their country in despair--wandering they knew not

whither--without a home, and without a country! Abraham Lincoln's

assassination was indeed done by a half crazed Southern rebel; but who

can doubt, after reading the secrets revealed in the foregoing pages,

that the frenzy that fired Booth's brain, and the nerve that enabled him

to fire the deadly shot, came as directly from the Democratic party,

as a party, as that the pistol itself was purchased by a Democratic

partisan. All these facts go hand-in-hand, and there is no separating

one from the others.

But we have already occupied much more of time and space on the Athenian

Republic than we had intended. We can only say, in conclusion, that,

after the reign of the "thirty tyrants," its fortunes were up and

down--oftener down than up--until the battle of Chæronea, which occurred

in the year 338 before Christ, when the liberties of Greece were made

to yield finally and forever to the stronger arm of the Macedonian. The

Athenian Republic had existed after a fashion--and, indeed, much of the

time it was orderly "after a fashion"--for seven hundred and thirty years;

and when it fell, there was not so much as an empty shell left. Its

internal dissensions, more than anything else, had eaten out its vitals;

the jealousy of surrounding monarchies had been to it a constant source

of danger, and several times a source of great disaster; while for

fully one-half of the seven hun-dren and thirty years it was rather a

government of tyranny than of liberty to those who lived under it.

[Illustration: 0333]

Secrets of the Late Rebellion, Now Revealed for the First Time · 第 8 / 10 章