CHAPTER I.

E-text prepared by Donald Lainson and revised by Joseph E. Loewenstein,

M.D.

Editorial note:

Anthony Trollope travelled through the United States from

August, 1861, to May, 1862. He visited all the states that

did not secede except California. This book is partly a

journal of his travels and partly his description of American

customs and culture including industry, education, government,

military affairs, religion, transportation, and even

hotels. To an American of today it provides a revealing and

fascinating picture of life at the time.

The book was first published in two volumes by Chapman & Hall

in 1862.

Project Gutenberg has the other volume of this work.

Volume I: see https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/1865

NORTH AMERICA

by

ANTHONY TROLLOPE

In Two Volumes

VOL. II

CONTENTS

I. WASHINGTON.

II. CONGRESS.

III. THE CAUSES OF THE WAR.

IV. WASHINGTON TO ST. LOUIS.

V. MISSOURI.

VI. CAIRO AND CAMP WOOD.

VII. THE ARMY OF THE NORTH.

VIII. BACK TO BOSTON.

IX. THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

X. THE GOVERNMENT.

XI. THE LAW COURTS AND LAWYERS OF THE UNITED STATES.

XII. THE FINANCIAL POSITION.

XIII. THE POST-OFFICE.

XIV. AMERICAN HOTELS.

XV. LITERATURE.

XVI. CONCLUSION.

APPENDIX A. DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE.

APPENDIX B. ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION, ETC.

APPENDIX C. CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

CHAPTER I.

WASHINGTON.

The site of the present city of Washington was chosen with three

special views; firstly, that being on the Potomac it might have the

full advantage of water-carriage and a sea-port; secondly, that

it might be so far removed from the seaboard as to be safe from

invasion; and, thirdly, that it might be central alike to all the

States. It was presumed when Washington was founded that these three

advantages would be secured by the selected position. As regards the

first, the Potomac affords to the city but few of the advantages

of a sea-port. Ships can come up, but not ships of large burthen.

The river seems to have dwindled since the site was chosen; and at

present it is, I think, evident that Washington can never be great in

its shipping. _Statio benefida carinis_ can never be its motto. As

regards the second point, singularly enough Washington is the only

city of the Union that has been in an enemy's possession since the

United States became a nation. In the war of 1812 it fell into our

hands, and we burnt it. As regards the third point, Washington, from

the lie of the land, can hardly have been said to be centrical at

any time. Owing to the irregularities of the coast it is not easy of

access by railways from different sides. Baltimore would have been

far better. But as far as we can now see, and as well as we can now

judge, Washington will soon be on the borders of the nation to which

it belongs, instead of at its centre. I fear, therefore, that we must

acknowledge that the site chosen for his country's capital by George

Washington has not been fortunate.

I have a strong idea, which I expressed before in speaking of the

capital of the Canadas, that no man can ordain that on such a spot

shall be built a great and thriving city. No man can so ordain even

though he leave behind him, as was the case with Washington, a

prestige sufficient to bind his successors to his wishes. The

political leaders of the country have done what they could for

Washington. The pride of the nation has endeavoured to sustain

the character of its chosen metropolis. There has been no rival,

soliciting favour on the strength of other charms. The country has

all been agreed on the point since the father of the country first

commenced the work. Florence and Rome in Italy have each their

pretensions; but in the States no other city has put itself forward

for the honour of entertaining Congress. And yet Washington has been

a failure. It is commerce that makes great cities, and commerce has

refused to back the General's choice. New York and Philadelphia,

without any political power, have become great among the cities of

the earth. They are beaten by none except by London and Paris. But

Washington is but a ragged, unfinished collection of unbuilt broad

streets, as to the completion of which there can now, I imagine, be

but little hope.

Of all places that I know it is the most ungainly and most

unsatisfactory;--I fear I must also say the most presumptuous in its

pretensions. There is a map of Washington accurately laid down; and

taking that map with him in his journeyings a man may lose himself in

the streets, not as one loses oneself in London between Shoreditch

and Russell Square, but as one does so in the deserts of the Holy

Land, between Emmaus and Arimathea. In the first place no one knows

where the places are, or is sure of their existence, and then between

their presumed localities the country is wild, trackless, unbridged,

uninhabited, and desolate. Massachusetts Avenue runs the whole length

of the city, and is inserted on the maps as a full-blown street,

about four miles in length. Go there, and you will find yourself not

only out of town, away among the fields, but you will find yourself

beyond the fields, in an uncultivated, undrained wilderness. Tucking

your trousers up to your knees you will wade through the bogs, you

will lose yourself among rude hillocks, you will be out of the reach

of humanity. The unfinished dome of the Capitol will loom before you

in the distance, and you will think that you approach the ruins of

some western Palmyra. If you are a sportsman, you will desire to

shoot snipe within sight of the President's house. There is much

unsettled land within the States of America, but I think none so

desolate in its state of nature as three-fourths of the ground on

which is supposed to stand the city of Washington.

The city of Washington is something more than four miles long, and

is something more than two miles broad. The land apportioned to it

is nearly as compact as may be, and it exceeds in area the size

of a parallelogram four miles long by two broad. These dimensions

are adequate for a noble city, for a city to contain a million of

inhabitants. It is impossible to state with accuracy the actual

population of Washington, for it fluctuates exceedingly. The place

is very full during Congress, and very empty during the recess.

By which I mean it to be understood that those streets, which

are blessed with houses, are full when Congress meets. I do not

think that Congress makes much difference to Massachusetts Avenue.

I believe that the city never contains as many as eighty thousand,

and that its permanent residents are less than sixty thousand.

But, it will be said,--was it not well to prepare for a growing city?

Is it not true that London is choked by its own fatness, not having

been endowed at its birth or during its growth, with proper means for

accommodating its own increasing proportions? Was it not well to lay

down fine avenues and broad streets, so that future citizens might

find a city well prepared to their hand?

There is no doubt much in such an argument, but its correctness must

be tested by its success. When a man marries it is well that he

should make provision for a coming family. But a Benedict, who early

in his career shall have carried his friends with considerable

self-applause through half-a-dozen nurseries and at the end of twelve

years shall still be the father of one ricketty baby, will incur a

certain amount of ridicule. It is very well to be prepared for good

fortune, but one should limit one's preparation within a reasonable

scope. Two miles by one might perhaps have done for the skeleton

sketch of a new city. Less than half that would contain much more

than the present population of Washington; and there are, I fear, few

towns in the Union so little likely to enjoy any speedy increase.

Three avenues sweep the whole length of Washington;--Virginia Avenue,

Pennsylvania Avenue, and Massachusetts Avenue. But Pennsylvania

Avenue is the only one known to ordinary men, and the half of that

only is so known. This avenue is the backbone of the city, and those

streets which are really inhabited cluster round that half of it

which runs westward from the Capitol. The eastern end, running from

the front of the Capitol, is again a desert. The plan of the city is

somewhat complicated. It may truly be called "a mighty maze, but not

without a plan." The Capitol was intended to be the centre of the

city. It faces eastward, away from the Potomac,--or rather from the

main branch of the Potomac, and also unfortunately from the main body

of the town. It turns its back upon the chief thoroughfare, upon the

Treasury buildings, and upon the President's house; and indeed upon

the whole place. It was, I suppose, intended that the streets to the

eastward should be noble and populous, but hitherto they have come

to nothing. The building therefore is wrong side foremost, and all

mankind who enter it, senators, representatives, and judges included,

go in at the back-door. Of course it is generally known that in

the Capitol is the Chamber of the Senate, that of the House of

Representatives, and the Supreme Judicial Court of the Union. It may

be said that there are two centres in Washington, this being one and

the President's house the other. At these centres the main avenues

are supposed to cross each other, which avenues are called by the

names of the respective States. At the Capitol, Pennsylvania Avenue,

New Jersey Avenue, Delaware Avenue, and Maryland Avenue converge.

They come from one extremity of the city to the square of the Capitol

on one side, and run out from the other side of it to the other

extremity of the city. Pennsylvania Avenue, New York Avenue, Vermont

Avenue, and Connecticut Avenue do the same at what is generally

called President's Square. In theory, or on paper, this seems to be a

clear and intelligible arrangement; but it does not work well. These

centre depots are large spaces, and consequently one portion of a

street is removed a considerable distance from the other. It is as

though the same name should be given to two streets, one of which

entered St. James's Park at Buckingham Gate, while the other started

from the Park at Marlborough House. To inhabitants the matter

probably is not of much moment, as it is well known that this portion

of such an avenue and that portion of such another avenue are merely

myths,--unknown lands away in the wilds. But a stranger finds himself

in the position of being sent across the country knee-deep into the

mud, wading through snipe grounds, looking for civilization where

none exists.

All these avenues have a slanting direction. They are so arranged

that none of them run north and south or east and west; but the

streets, so called, all run in accordance with the points of the

compass. Those from east to west are A Street, B Street, C Street,

and so on,--counting them away from the Capitol on each side, so that

there are two A streets and two B streets. On the map these streets

run up to V Street, both right and left,--V Street North and V Street

South. Those really known to mankind are E, F, G, H, I, and K Streets

North. Then those streets which run from north to south are numbered

First Street, Second Street, Third Street, and so on, on each front

of the Capitol, running to Twenty-fourth or Twenty-fifth Street on

each side. Not very many of these have any existence, or I might

perhaps more properly say, any vitality in their existence.

Such is the plan of the city, that being the arrangement and those

the dimensions intended by the original architects and founders of

Washington; but the inhabitants have hitherto confined themselves to

Pennsylvania Avenue West, and to the streets abutting from it or near

to it. Whatever address a stranger may receive, however perplexing

it may seem to him, he may be sure that the house indicated is near

Pennsylvania Avenue. If it be not, I should recommend him to pay no

attention to the summons. Even in those streets with which he will

become best acquainted, the houses are not continuous. There will be

a house, and then a blank; then two houses, and then a double blank.

After that a hut or two, and then probably an excellent, roomy,

handsome family mansion. Taken altogether, Washington as a city is

most unsatisfactory, and falls more grievously short of the thing

attempted than any other of the great undertakings of which I have

seen anything in the States. San Jose, the capital of the republic of

Costa Rica, in Central America, has been prepared and arranged as a

new city in the same way. But even San Jose comes nearer to what was

intended than does Washington.

For myself, I do not believe in cities made after this fashion.

Commerce, I think, must select the site of all large congregations of

mankind. In some mysterious way she ascertains what she wants, and

having acquired that, draws men in thousands round her properties.

Liverpool, New York, Lyons, Glasgow, Venice, Marseilles, Hamburg,

Calcutta, Chicago, and Leghorn, have all become populous, and are or

have been great, because trade found them to be convenient for its

purposes. Trade seems to have ignored Washington altogether. Such

being the case, the Legislature and the Executive of the country

together have been unable to make of Washington anything better than

a straggling congregation of buildings in a wilderness. We are now

trying the same experiment at Ottawa, in Canada, having turned our

back upon Montreal in dudgeon. The site of Ottawa is more interesting

than that of Washington, but I doubt whether the experiment will be

more successful. A new town for art, fashion, and politics has been

built at Munich, and there it seems to answer the expectation of the

builders; but at Munich there is an old city as well, and commerce

had already got some considerable hold on the spot before the new

town was added to it.

The streets of Washington, such as exist, are all broad. Throughout

the town there are open spaces,--spaces, I mean, intended to be open

by the plan laid down for the city. At the present moment it is

almost all open space. There is also a certain nobility about the

proposed dimensions of the avenues and squares. Desirous of praising

it in some degree, I can say that the design is grand. The thing

done, however, falls so infinitely short of that design, that nothing

but disappointment is felt. And I fear that there is no look-out

into the future which can justify a hope that the design will be

fulfilled. It is therefore a melancholy place. The society into which

one falls there consists mostly of persons who are not permanently

resident in the capital; but of those who were permanent residents I

found none who spoke of their city with affection. The men and women

of Boston think that the sun shines nowhere else;--and Boston Common

is very pleasant. The New Yorkers believe in Fifth Avenue with an

unswerving faith; and Fifth Avenue is calculated to inspire a faith.

Philadelphia to a Philadelphian is the centre of the universe, and

the progress of Philadelphia, perhaps, justifies the partiality. The

same thing may be said of Chicago, of Buffalo, and of Baltimore. But

the same thing cannot be said in any degree of Washington. They who

belong to it turn up their noses at it. They feel that they live

surrounded by a failure. Its grand names are as yet false, and none

of the efforts made have hitherto been successful. Even in winter,

when Congress is sitting, Washington is melancholy;--but Washington

in summer must surely be the saddest spot on earth.

There are six principal public buildings in Washington, as to which

no expense seems to have been spared, and in the construction of

which a certain amount of success has been obtained. In most of these

this success has been more or less marred by an independent deviation

from recognized rules of architectural taste. These are the Capitol,

the Post-office, the Patent-office, the Treasury, the President's

house, and the Smithsonian Institute. The five first are Grecian,

and the last in Washington is called--Romanesque. Had I been left to

classify it by my own unaided lights, I should have called it bastard

Gothic.

The Capitol is by far the most imposing; and though there is much

about it with which I cannot but find fault, it certainly is

imposing. The present building was, I think, commenced in 1815, the

former Capitol having been destroyed by the English in the war of

1812-13. It was then finished according to the original plan, with a

fine portico and well-proportioned pediment above it,--looking to the

east. The outer flight of steps, leading up to this from the eastern

approach, is good and in excellent taste. The expanse of the building

to the right and left, as then arranged, was well proportioned,

and, as far as we can now judge, the then existing dome was well

proportioned also. As seen from the east the original building

must have been in itself very fine. The stone is beautiful, being

bright almost as marble, and I do not know that there was any great

architectural defect to offend the eye. The figures in the pediment

are mean. There is now in the Capitol a group apparently prepared for

a pediment, which is by no means mean. I was informed that they were

intended for this position; but they, on the other hand, are too good

for such a place, and are also too numerous. This set of statues

is by Crawford. Most of them are well known, and they are very

fine. They now stand within the old chamber of the Representative

House, and the pity is, that if elevated to such a position as that

indicated, they can never be really seen. There are models of them

all at West Point, and some of them I have seen at other places in

marble. The Historical Society at New York has one or two of them.

In and about the front of the Capitol there are other efforts of

sculpture,--imposing in their size, and assuming, if not affecting,

much in the attitudes chosen. Statuary at Washington runs too much on

two subjects, which are repeated perhaps almost ad nauseam; one is

that of a stiff, steady-looking, healthy, but ugly individual, with

a square jaw and big jowl, which represents the great General; he

does not prepossess the beholder, because he appears to be thoroughly

ill-natured. And the other represents a melancholy, weak figure

without any hair, but often covered with feathers, and is intended

to typify the red Indian. The red Indian is generally supposed to

be receiving comfort; but it is manifest that he never enjoys the

comfort ministered to him. There is a gigantic statue of Washington,

by Greenough, out in the grounds in front of the building. The figure

is seated and holding up one of its arms towards the city. There is

about it a kind of weighty magnificence; but it is stiff, ungainly,

and altogether without life.

But the front of the original building is certainly grand. The

architect who designed it must have had skill, taste, and nobility of

conception; but even this was spoilt, or rather wasted, by the fact

that the front is made to look upon nothing, and is turned from the

city. It is as though the _façade_ of the London Post-office had been

made to face the Goldsmiths' Hall. The Capitol stands upon the side

of a hill, the front occupying a much higher position than the back;

consequently they who enter it from the back--and everybody does so

enter it--are first called on to rise to the level of the lower floor

by a stiff ascent of exterior steps, which are in no way grand or

imposing, and then, having entered by a mean back-door, are instantly

obliged to ascend again by another flight,--by stairs sufficiently

appropriate to a back entrance, but altogether unfitted for the chief

approach to such a building. It may, of course, be said that persons

who are particular in such matters should go in at the front door and

not at the back; but one must take these things as one finds them.

The entrance by which the Capitol is approached is such as I have

described. There are mean little brick chimneys at the left hand as

one walks in, attached to modern bakeries which have been constructed

in the basement for the use of the soldiers; and there is on

the other hand the road by which waggons find their way to the

underground region with fuel, stationery, and other matters desired

by senators and representatives,--and at present by bakers also.

In speaking of the front I have spoken of it as it was originally

designed and built. Since that period very heavy wings have been

added to the pile;--wings so heavy that they are or seem to be much

larger than the original structure itself. This, to my thinking, has

destroyed the symmetry of the whole. The wings, which in themselves

are by no means devoid of beauty, are joined to the centre by

passages so narrow that from exterior points of view the light can be

seen through them. This robs the mass of all oneness, of all entirety

as a whole, and gives a scattered straggling appearance where there

should be a look of massiveness and integrity. The dome also has been

raised, a double drum having been given to it. This is unfinished

and should not therefore yet be judged; but I cannot think that the

increased height will be an improvement. This again, to my eyes,

appears to be straggling rather than massive. At a distance it

commands attention, and to one journeying through the desert places

of the city gives that idea of Palmyra which I have before mentioned.

Nevertheless, and in spite of all that I have said, I have had

pleasure in walking backwards and forwards, and through the grounds

which lie before the eastern front of the Capitol. The space for the

view is ample, and the thing to be seen has points which are very

grand. If the Capitol were finished and all Washington were built

around it, no man would say that the house in which Congress sat

disgraced the city.

Going west, but not due west, from the Capitol, Pennsylvania Avenue

stretches in a right line to the Treasury Chambers. The distance is

beyond a mile, and men say, scornfully, that the two buildings have

been put so far apart in order to save the Secretaries who sit in

the bureaux from a too rapid influx of members of Congress. This

statement I by no means indorse; but it is undoubtedly the fact that

both senators and representatives are very diligent in their calls

upon gentlemen high in office. I have been present on some such

occasions, and it has always seemed to me that questions of patronage

have been paramount. This reach of Pennsylvania Avenue is the quarter

for the best shops of Washington,--that is to say, the frequented

side of it is so,--that side which is on your right as you leave the

Capitol. Of the other side the world knows nothing. And very bad

shops they are. I doubt whether there be any town in the world at all

equal in importance to Washington, which is in such respects so ill

provided. The shops are bad and dear. In saying this I am guided by

the opinions of all whom I heard speak on the subject. The same thing

was told me of the hotels. Hearing that the city was very full at the

time of my visit--full to overflowing--I had obtained private rooms

through a friend before I went there. Had I not done so, I might have

lain in the streets, or have made one with three or four others in a

small room at some third-rate inn. There had never been so great a

throng in the town. I am bound to say that my friend did well for me.

I found myself put up at the house of one Wormley, a coloured man, in

I Street, to whose attention I can recommend any Englishman who may

chance to want quarters in Washington. He has an hotel on one side of

the street, and private lodging-houses on the other in which I found

myself located. From what I heard of the hotels I conceived myself

to be greatly in luck. Willard's is the chief of these, and the

everlasting crowd and throng of men with which the halls and passages

of the house were always full, certainly did not seem to promise

either privacy or comfort. But then there are places in which

privacy and comfort are not expected,--are hardly even desired,--and

Washington is one of them.

The Post-office and the Patent-office lie a little away from

Pennsylvania Avenue in F Street, and are opposite to each other. The

Post-office is certainly a very graceful building. It is square, and

hardly can be said to have any settled front or any grand entrance.

It is not approached by steps, but stands flush on the ground,

alike on each of the four sides. It is ornamented with Corinthian

pilasters, but is not over ornamented. It is certainly a structure

creditable to any city. The streets around it are all unfinished, and

it is approached through seas of mud and sloughs of despond, which

have been contrived, as I imagine, to lessen, if possible, the

crowd of callers, and lighten in this way the overtasked officials

within. That side by which the public in general were supposed to

approach was, during my sojourn, always guarded by vast mountains of

flour-barrels. Looking up at the windows of the building I perceived

also that barrels were piled within, and then I knew that the

Post-office had become a provision depot for the army. The official

arrangements here for the public were so bad as to be absolutely

barbarous. I feel some remorse in saying this, for I was myself

treated with the utmost courtesy by gentlemen holding high positions

in the office,--to which I was specially attracted by my own

connection with the Post-office in England. But I do not think that

such courtesy should hinder me from telling what I saw that was

bad,--seeing that it would not hinder me from telling what I saw that

was good. In Washington there is but one Post-office. There are no

iron pillars or wayside letter-boxes, as are to be found in other

towns of the Union;--no subsidiary offices at which stamps can be

bought and letters posted. The distances of the city are very great,

the means of transit through the city very limited, the dirt of the

city ways unrivalled in depth and tenacity; and yet there is but one

Post-office. Nor is there any established system of letter-carriers.

To those who desire it, letters are brought out and delivered by

carriers who charge a separate porterage for that service; but

the rule is that letters shall be delivered from the window. For

strangers this is of course a necessity of their position; and I

found that when once I had left instructions that my letters should

be delivered, those instructions were carefully followed. Indeed

nothing could exceed the civility of the officials within;--but so

also nothing can exceed the barbarity of the arrangements without.

The purchase of stamps I found to be utterly impracticable. They

were sold at a window in a corner, at which newspapers were also

delivered, to which there was no regular ingress, and from which

there was no egress. It would generally be deeply surrounded by a

crowd of muddy soldiers, who would wait there patiently till time

should enable them to approach the window. The delivery of letters

was almost more tedious, though in that there was a method. The

aspirants stood in a long line, _en cue_, as we are told by Carlyle

that the bread-seekers used to approach the bakers' shops at Paris

during the Revolution. This "cue" would sometimes project out into

the street. The work inside was done very slowly. The clerk had no

facility, by use of a desk or otherwise, for running through the

letters under the initials denominated, but turned letter by letter

through his hand. To one questioner out of ten would a letter

be given. It no doubt may be said in excuse for this that the

presence of the army round Washington caused at that period special

inconvenience; and that plea should of course be taken, were it

not that a very trifling alteration in the management within would

have remedied all the inconvenience. As a building the Washington

Post-office is very good; as the centre of a most complicated and

difficult department, I believe it to be well managed: but as regards

the special accommodation given by it to the city in which it stands,

much cannot, I think, be said in its favour.

Opposite to that which is, I presume, the back of the Post-office,

stands the Patent-office. This also is a grand building, with a fine

portico of Doric pillars at each of its three fronts. These are

approached by flights of steps, more gratifying to the eye than to

the legs. The whole structure is massive and grand, and, if the

streets round it were finished, would be imposing. The utilitarian

spirit of the nation has, however, done much toward marring the

appearance of the building, by piercing it with windows altogether

unsuited to it, both in number and size. The walls, even under the

porticoes, have been so pierced, in order that the whole space might

be utilized without loss of light; and the effect is very mean. The

windows are small and without ornament,--something like a London

window of the time of George III. The effect produced by a dozen such

at the back of a noble Doric porch, looking down among the pillars,

may be imagined.

In the interior of this building the Minister of the Interior holds

his court, and of course also the Commissioners of Patents. Here is,

in accordance with the name of the building, a museum of models of

all patents taken out. I wandered through it, gazing with listless

eye, now upon this, and now upon that; but to me, in my ignorance,

it was no better than a large toy-shop. When I saw an ancient

dusty white hat, with some peculiar appendage to it which was

unintelligible, it was no more to me than any other old white hat.

But had I been a man of science, what a tale it might have told!

Wandering about through the Patent-office I also found a hospital for

soldiers. A British officer was with me who pronounced it to be, in

its kind, very good. At any rate it was sweet, airy, and large. In

these days the soldiers had got hold of everything.

The Treasury Chambers is as yet an unfinished building. The front

to the south has been completed; but that to the north has not been

built. Here at the north stands as yet the old Secretary of State's

office. This is to come down, and the Secretary of State is to be

located in the new building, which will be added to the Treasury.

This edifice will probably strike strangers more forcibly than any

other in the town, both from its position and from its own character.

It stands with its side to Pennsylvania Avenue, but the avenue here

has turned round, and runs due north and south, having taken a twist,

so as to make way for the Treasury and for the President's house,

through both of which it must run had it been carried straight on

throughout. These public offices stand with their side to the street,

and the whole length is ornamented with an exterior row of Ionic

columns raised high above the footway. This is perhaps the prettiest

thing in the city, and when the front to the north has been

completed, the effect will be still better. The granite monoliths

which have been used, and which are to be used, in this building are

very massive. As one enters by the steps to the south there are two

flat stones, one on each side of the ascent, the surface of each

of which is about 20 feet by 18. The columns are, I think, all

monoliths. Of those which are still to be erected, and which now lie

about in the neighbouring streets, I measured one or two--one which

was still in the rough I found to be 32 feet long by 5 feet broad,

and 4½ deep. These granite blocks have been brought to Washington

from the State of Maine. The finished front of this building, looking

down to the Potomac, is very good; but to my eyes this also has been

much injured by the rows of windows which look out from the building

into the space of the portico.

The President's house--or the White House as it is now called all the

world over--is a handsome mansion fitted for the chief officer of

a great Republic, and nothing more. I think I may say that we have

private houses in London considerably larger. It is neat and pretty,

and with all its immediate outside belongings calls down no adverse

criticism. It faces on to a small garden, which seems to be always

accessible to the public, and opens out upon that everlasting

Pennsylvania Avenue, which has now made another turn. Here in front

of the White House is President's Square, as it is generally called.

The technical name is, I believe, La Fayette Square. The houses round

it are few in number,--not exceeding three or four on each side, but

they are among the best in Washington, and the whole place is neat

and well kept. President's Square is certainly the most attractive

part of the city. The garden of the square is always open, and does

not seem to suffer from any public ill-usage; by which circumstance

I am again led to suggest that the gardens of our London squares

might be thrown open in the same way. In the centre of this one

at Washington, immediately facing the President's house, is an

equestrian statue of General Jackson. It is very bad; but that it

is not nearly as bad as it might be is proved by another equestrian

statue,--of General Washington,--erected in the centre of a small

garden-plat at the end of Pennsylvania Avenue, near the bridge

leading to Georgetown. Of all the statues on horseback which I ever

saw, either in marble or bronze, this is by far the worst and most

ridiculous. The horse is most absurd, but the man sitting on the

horse is manifestly drunk. I should think the time must come when

this figure at any rate will be removed.

I did not go inside the President's house, not having had while

at Washington an opportunity of paying my personal respects to Mr.

Lincoln. I had been told that this was to be done without trouble,

but when I inquired on the subject I found that this was not exactly

the case. I believe there are times when anybody may walk into the

President's house without an introduction; but that, I take it, is

not considered to be the proper way of doing the work. I found that

something like a favour would be incurred, or that some disagreeable

trouble would be given, if I made a request to be presented,--and

therefore I left Washington without seeing the great man.

The President's house is nice to look at, but it is built on marshy

ground, not much above the level of the Potomac, and is very

unhealthy. I was told that all who live there become subject to fever

and ague, and that few who now live there have escaped it altogether.

This comes of choosing the site of a new city, and decreeing that it

shall be built on this or on that spot. Large cities, especially in

these latter days, do not collect themselves in unhealthy places. Men

desert such localities,--or at least do not congregate at them when

their character is once known. But the poor President cannot desert

the White House. He must make the most of the residence which the

nation has prepared for him.

Of the other considerable public building of Washington, called the

Smithsonian Institution, I have said that its style was bastard

Gothic; by this I mean that its main attributes are Gothic, but that

liberties have been taken with it, which, whether they may injure its

beauty or no, certainly are subversive of architectural purity. It is

built of red stone, and is not ugly in itself. There is a very nice

Norman porch to it, and little bits of Lombard Gothic have been well

copied from Cologne. But windows have been fitted in with stilted

arches, of which the stilts seem to crack and bend, so narrow are

they and so high. And then the towers with high pinnacled roofs are a

mistake,--unless indeed they be needed to give to the whole structure

that name of Romanesque which it has assumed. The building is used

for museums and lectures, and was given to the city by one James

Smithson, an Englishman. I cannot say that the city of Washington

seems to be grateful, for all to whom I spoke on the subject hinted

that the Institution was a failure. It is to be remarked that nobody

in Washington is proud of Washington, or of anything in it. If the

Smithsonian Institution were at New York or at Boston, one would have

a different story to tell.

There has been an attempt made to raise at Washington a vast obelisk

to the memory of Washington,--the first in war and first in peace,

as the country is proud to call him. This obelisk is a fair type

of the city. It is unfinished,--not a third of it having as yet

been erected,--and in all human probability ever will remain so. If

finished it would be the highest monument of its kind standing on the

face of the globe,--and yet, after all, what would it be even then as

compared with one of the great pyramids? Modern attempts cannot bear

comparison with those of the old world in simple vastness. But in

lieu of simple vastness, the modern world aims to achieve either

beauty or utility. By the Washington monument, if completed, neither

would be achieved. An obelisk with the proportions of a needle

may be very graceful; but an obelisk which requires an expanse of

flat-roofed, sprawling buildings for its base, and of which the shaft

shall be as big as a cathedral tower, cannot be graceful. At present

some third portion of the shaft has been built, and there it stands.

No one has a word to say for it. No one thinks that money will ever

again be subscribed for its completion. I saw somewhere a box of

plate-glass kept for contributions for this purpose, and looking in

perceived that two half-dollar pieces had been given;--but both of

them were bad. I was told also that the absolute foundation of the

edifice is bad;--that the ground, which is near the river and swampy,

would not bear the weight intended to be imposed on it.

A sad and saddening spot was that marsh, as I wandered down on it all

alone one Sunday afternoon. The ground was frozen and I could walk

dry-shod, but there was not a blade of grass. Around me on all sides

were cattle in great numbers--steers and big oxen--lowing in their

hunger for a meal. They were beef for the army, and never again I

suppose would it be allowed to them to fill their big maws and chew

the patient cud. There, on the brown, ugly, undrained field, within

easy sight of the President's house, stood the useless, shapeless,

graceless pile of stones. It was as though I were looking on the

genius of the city. It was vast, pretentious, bold, boastful with a

loud voice, already taller by many heads than other obelisks, but

nevertheless still in its infancy,--ugly, unpromising, and false. The

founder of the monument had said, Here shall be the obelisk of the

world! and the founder of the city had thought of his child somewhat

in the same strain. It is still possible that both city and monument

shall be completed; but at the present moment nobody seems to believe

in the one or in the other. For myself I have much faith in the

American character, but I cannot believe either in Washington city or

in the Washington monument. The boast made has been too loud, and the

fulfilment yet accomplished has been too small!

Have I as yet said that Washington was dirty in that winter of

1861-1862? Or, I should rather ask, have I made it understood that

in walking about Washington one waded as deep in mud as one does in

floundering through an ordinary ploughed field in November? There

were parts of Pennsylvania Avenue which would have been considered

heavy ground by most hunting-men, and through some of the remoter

streets none but light weights could have lived long. This was the

state of the town when I left it in the middle of January. On my

arrival in the middle of December, everything was in a cloud of

dust. One walked through an atmosphere of floating mud; for the dirt

was ponderous and thick, and very palpable in its atoms. Then came

a severe frost and a little snow; and if one did not fall while

walking, it was very well. After that we had the thaw; and Washington

assumed its normal winter condition. I must say that, during the

whole of this time, the atmosphere was to me exhilarating; but I was

hardly out of the doctor's hands while I was there, and he did not

support my theory as to the goodness of the air. "It is poisoned by

the soldiers," he said, "and everybody is ill." But then my doctor

was perhaps a little tinged with southern proclivities.

On the Virginian side of the Potomac stands a country-house called

Arlington Heights, from which there is a fine view down upon the

city. Arlington Heights is a beautiful spot,--having all the

attractions of a fine park in our country. It is covered with grand

timber. The ground is varied and broken, and the private roads about

sweep here into a dell and then up a brae-side, as roads should do in

such a domain. Below it was the Potomac, and immediately on the other

side stands the city of Washington. Any city seen thus is graceful;

and the white stones of the big buildings when the sun gleams on

them, showing the distant rows of columns, seem to tell something of

great endeavour and of achieved success. It is the place from whence

Washington should be seen by those who wish to think well of the

present city and of its future prosperity. But is it not the case

that every city is beautiful from a distance?

The house at Arlington Heights is picturesque, but neither large

nor good. It has before it a high Greek colonnade, which seems to

be almost bigger than the house itself. Had such been built in a

city,--and many such a portico does stand in cities through the

States,--it would be neither picturesque nor graceful; but here it is

surrounded by timber, and as the columns are seen through the trees,

they gratify the eye rather than offend it. The place did belong,

and as I think does still belong, to the family of the Lees,--if not

already confiscated. General Lee, who is or would be the present

owner, bears high command in the army of the Confederalists, and

knows well by what tenure he holds, or is likely to hold, his family

property. The family were friends of General Washington, whose seat,

Mount Vernon, stands about twelve miles lower down the river; and

here, no doubt, Washington often stood, looking on the site he had

chosen. If his spirit could stand there now and look around upon the

masses of soldiers by which his capital is surrounded, how would it

address the city of his hopes? When he saw that every foot of the

neighbouring soil was desecrated by a camp, or torn into loathsome

furrows of mud by cannon and army waggons,--that agriculture was

gone, and that every effort both of North and South was concentrated

on the art of killing; when he saw that this was done on the very

spot chosen by himself for the centre temple of an everlasting union,

what would he then say as to that boast made on his behalf by his

countrymen that he was first in war and first in peace? Washington

was a great man, and I believe a good man. I, at any rate, will not

belittle him. I think that he had the firmness and audacity necessary

for a revolutionary leader, that he had honesty to preserve him from

the temptations of ambition and ostentation, and that he had the good

sense to be guided in civil matters by men who had studied the laws

of social life and the theories of free government. He was _justus

et tenax propositi_; and in periods that might well have dismayed

a smaller man, he feared neither the throne to which he opposed

himself, nor the changing voices of the fellow-citizens for whose

welfare he had fought. But sixty or seventy years will not suffice to

give to a man the fame of having been first among all men. Washington

did much, and I for one do not believe that his work will perish.

But I have always found it difficult,--I may say impossible,--to

sound his praises in his own land. Let us suppose that a courteous

Frenchman ventures an opinion among Englishmen that Wellington was a

great general, would he feel disposed to go on with his eulogium when

encountered on two or three sides at once with such observations as

the following:--"I should rather calculate he was; about the first

that ever did live or ever will live. Why, he whipped your Napoleon

everlasting whenever he met him. He whipped everybody out of the

field. There warn't anybody ever lived was able to stand nigh him,

and there won't come any like him again. Sir, I guess our Wellington

never had his likes on your side of the water. Such men can't

grow in a down-trodden country of slaves and paupers." Under such

circumstances the Frenchman would probably be shut up. And when I

strove to speak of Washington I generally found myself shut up also.

Arlington Heights, when I was at Washington, was the head-quarters of

General M'Dowell, the General to whom is attributed--I believe most

wrongfully--the loss of the battle of Bull's Run. The whole place was

then one camp. The fences had disappeared. The gardens were trodden

into mud. The roads had been cut to pieces, and new tracks made

everywhere through the grounds. But the timber still remained. Some

no doubt had fallen, but enough stood for the ample ornamentation

of the place. I saw placards up, prohibiting the destruction of the

trees, and it is to be hoped that they have been spared. Very little

in this way has been spared in the country all around.

Mount Vernon, Washington's own residence, stands close over the

Potomac, above six miles below Alexandria. It will be understood that

the capital is on the eastern, or Maryland side of the river, and

that Arlington Heights, Alexandria, and Mount Vernon are in Virginia.

The river Potomac divided the two old colonies, or States as they

afterwards became; but when Washington was to be built, a territory,

said to be ten miles square, was cut out of the two States and was

called the district of Columbia. The greater portion of this district

was taken from Maryland, and on that the city was built. It comprised

the pleasant town of Georgetown, which is now a suburb--and the only

suburb--of Washington. The portion of the district on the Virginian

side included Arlington Heights, and went so far down the river as

to take in the Virginian city of Alexandria. This was the extreme

western point of the district; but since that arrangement was made,

the State of Virginia petitioned to have their portion of Columbia

back again, and this petition was granted. Now it is felt that the

land on both sides of the river should belong to the city, and the

Government is anxious to get back the Virginian section. The city and

the immediate vicinity are freed from all State allegiance, and are

under the immediate rule of the United States Government,--having of

course its own municipality; but the inhabitants have no political

power, as power is counted in the States. They vote for no political

officer, not even for the President, and return no member to

Congress, either as a senator or as a representative. Mount Vernon

was never within the district of Columbia.

When I first made inquiry on the subject I was told that Mount Vernon

at that time was not to be reached;--that though it was not in the

hands of the rebels, neither was it in the hands of Northerners, and

that therefore strangers could not go there; but this, though it

was told to me and others by those who should have known the facts,

was not the case. I had gone down the river with a party of ladies,

and we were opposite to Mount Vernon; but on that occasion we were

assured we could not land. The rebels, we were told, would certainly

seize the ladies, and carry them off into Secessia. On hearing which

the ladies were of course doubly anxious to be landed. But our stern

commander, for we were on a Government boat, would not listen to

their prayers, but carried us instead on board the "Pensacola," a

sloop-of-war which was now lying in the river, ready to go to sea,

and ready also to run the gauntlet of the rebel batteries which lined

the Virginian shore of the river for many miles down below Alexandria

and Mount Vernon. A sloop-of-war in these days means a large

man-of-war, the guns of which are so big that they only stand on

one deck, whereas a frigate would have them on two decks, and a

line-of-battle ship on three. Of line-of-battle ships there will, I

suppose, soon be none, as the "Warrior" is only a frigate. We went

over the "Pensacola," and I must say she was very nice, pretty, and

clean. I have always found American sailors on their men-of-war to

be clean and nice-looking,--as much so I should say as our own; but

nothing can be dirtier, more untidy, or apparently more ill-preserved

than all the appurtenances of their soldiers.

We landed also on this occasion at Alexandria, and saw as melancholy

and miserable a town as the mind of man can conceive. Its ordinary

male population, counting by the voters, is 1500, and of these 700

were in the southern army. The place had been made a hospital for

northern soldiers, and no doubt the site for that purpose had been

well chosen. But let any woman imagine what would be the feelings of

her life while living in a town used as a hospital for the enemies

against whom her absent husband was then fighting! Her own man would

be away ill,--wounded, dying, for what she knew, without the comfort

of any hospital attendance, without physic, with no one to comfort

him; but those she hated, with a hatred much keener than his, were

close to her hand, using some friend's house that had been forcibly

taken, crawling out into the sun under her eyes, taking the bread

from her mouth! Life in Alexandria at this time must have been sad

enough. The people were all secessionists, but the town was held by

the northern party. Through the lines, into Virginia, they could not

go at all. Up to Washington they could not go without a military

pass, not to be obtained without some cause given. All trade was at

an end. In no town at that time was trade very flourishing; but here

it was killed altogether,--except that absolutely necessary trade of

bread. Who would buy boots or coats, or want new saddles, or waste

money on books, in such days as these, in such a town as Alexandria?

And then out of 1500 men, one-half had gone to fight the southern

battles! Among the women of Alexandria secession would have found but

few opponents.

It was here that a hot-brained young man, named Ellsworth, was killed

in the early days of the rebellion. He was a colonel in the northern

volunteer army, and on entering Alexandria found a secession flag

flying at the chief hotel. Instead of sending up a corporal's guard

to remove it, he rushed up and pulled it down with his own hand. As

he descended, the landlord shot him dead, and one of his soldiers

shot the landlord dead. It was a pity that so brave a lad, who had

risen so high, should fall so vainly; but they have made a hero of

him in America;--have inscribed his name on marble monuments, and

counted him up among their great men. In all this their mistake

is very great. It is bad for a country to have no names worthy of

monumental brass; but it is worse for a country to have monumental

brasses covered with names which have never been made worthy of such

honour. Ellsworth had shown himself to be brave and foolish. Let his

folly be pardoned on the score of his courage, and there, I think,

should have been an end of it.

I found afterwards that Mount Vernon was accessible, and I rode

thither with some officers from the staff of General Heintzleman,

whose outside pickets were stationed beyond the old place. I

certainly should not have been well pleased had I been forced to

leave the country without seeing the house in which Washington had

lived and died. Till lately this place was owned and inhabited by

one of the family, a Washington, descended from a brother of the

General's; but it has now become the property of the country, under

the auspices of Mr. Everett, by whose exertions was raised the money

with which it was purchased. It is a long house, of two stories,

built, I think, chiefly of wood, with a verandah, or rather long

portico, attached to the front, which looks upon the river. There are

two wings, or sets of outhouses, containing the kitchen and servants'

rooms, which were joined by open wooden verandahs to the main

building; but one of these verandahs has gone, under the influence of

years. By these a semicircular sweep is formed before the front door,

which opens away from the river, and towards the old prim gardens,

in which, we were told, General Washington used to take much delight.

There is nothing very special about the house. Indeed, as a house, it

would now be found comfortless and inconvenient. But the ground falls

well down to the river, and the timber, if not fine, is plentiful

and picturesque. The chief interest of the place, however, is in the

tomb of Washington and his wife. It must be understood that it was a

common practice throughout the States to make a family burying-ground

in any secluded spot on the family property. I have not unfrequently

come across these in my rambles, and in Virginia I have encountered

small, unpretending gravestones under a shady elm, dated as lately as

eight or ten years back. At Mount Vernon there is now a cemetery of

the Washington family; and there, in an open vault--a vault open, but

guarded by iron grating--is the great man's tomb, and by his side

the tomb of Martha his wife. As I stood there alone, with no one

by to irritate me by assertions of the man's absolute supremacy, I

acknowledged that I had come to the final resting-place of a great

and good man,--of a man whose patriotism was, I believe, an honest

feeling, untinged by any personal ambition of a selfish nature. That

he was pre-eminently a successful man may have been due chiefly to

the excellence of his cause, and the blood and character of the

people who put him forward as their right arm in their contest;

but that he did not mar that success by arrogance, or destroy the

brightness of his own name by personal aggrandisement, is due to a

noble nature and to the calm individual excellence of the man.

Considering the circumstances and history of the place, the position

of Mount Vernon, as I saw it, was very remarkable. It lay exactly

between the lines of the two armies. The pickets of the Northern

army had been extended beyond it, not improbably with the express

intention of keeping a spot so hallowed within the power of the

northern Government. But since the war began it had been in the

hands of the seceders. In fact, it stood there in the middle of the

battle-field, on the very line of division between loyalism and

secession. And this was the spot which Washington had selected as the

heart and centre, and safest rallying homestead of the united nation

which he left behind him. But Washington, when he resolved to found

his capital on the banks of the Potomac, knew nothing of the glories

of the Mississippi. He did not dream of the speedy addition to his

already gathered constellations of those Western stars, of Wisconsin,

Illinois, Minnesota, and Iowa; nor did he dream of Texas conquered,

Louisiana purchased, and Missouri and Kansas rescued from the

wilderness.

I have said that Washington was at that time,--the Christmas of

1861-1862,--a melancholy place. This was partly owing to the

despondent tone in which so many Americans then spoke of their own

affairs. It was not that the northern men thought that they were to

be beaten, or that the southern men feared that things were going bad

with their party across the river; but that nobody seemed to have any

faith in anybody. Maclellan had been put up as the true man--exalted

perhaps too quickly, considering the limited opportunities for

distinguishing himself which fortune had thrown in his way; but now

belief in Maclellan seemed to be slipping away. One felt that it was

so from day to day, though it was impossible to define how or whence

the feeling came. And then the character of the ministry fared still

worse in public estimation. That Lincoln, the President, was honest,

and that Chase, the Secretary of the Treasury, was able, was the only

good that one heard spoken. At this time two Jonahs were specially

pointed out as necessary sacrifices, by whose immersion into the

comfortless ocean of private life the ship might perhaps be saved.

These were Mr. Cameron, the Secretary of War, and Mr. Welles, the

Secretary of the Navy. It was said that Lincoln, when pressed to rid

his Cabinet of Cameron, had replied, that when a man was crossing a

stream the moment was hardly convenient for changing his horse; but

it came to that at last, that he found he must change his horse, even

in the very sharpest run of the river. Better that than sit an animal

on whose exertions he knew that he could not trust. So Mr. Cameron

went, and Mr. Stanton became Secretary at War in his place. But Mr.

Cameron, though put out of the Cabinet, was to be saved from absolute

disgrace by being sent as Minister to Russia. I do not know that

it would become me here to repeat the accusations made against Mr.

Cameron, but it had long seemed to me that the maintenance in such

a position, at such a time, of a gentleman who had to sustain such

a universal absence of public confidence, must have been most

detrimental to the army and to the Government.

Men whom one met in Washington were not unhappy about the state of

things, as I had seen men unhappy in the North and in the West. They

were mainly indifferent, but with that sort of indifference which

arises from a break down of faith in anything. "There was the army!

Yes, the army! But what an army! Nobody obeyed anybody. Nobody did

anything! Nobody thought of advancing! There were, perhaps, two

hundred thousand men assembled round Washington; and now the effort

of supplying them with food and clothing was as much as could be

accomplished! But the contractors, in the meantime, were becoming

rich. And then as to the Government! Who trusted it? Who would put

their faith in Seward and Cameron? Cameron was now gone, it was true;

and in that way the whole of the Cabinet would soon be broken up. As

to Congress, what could Congress do? Ask questions which no one would

care to answer, and finally get itself packed up and sent home." The

President and the constitution fared no better in men's mouths. The

former did nothing,--neither harm nor good; and as for the latter, it

had broken down and shown itself to be inefficient. So men ate, and

drank, and laughed, waiting till chaos should come, secure in the

belief that the atoms into which their world would resolve itself,

would connect themselves again in some other form without trouble on

their part.

And at Washington I found no strong feeling against England and

English conduct towards America. "We men of the world," a Washington

man might have said, "know very well that everybody must take care of

himself first. We are very good friends with you,--of course, and are

very glad to see you at our table whenever you come across the water;

but as for rejoicing at your joys, or expecting you to sympathize

with our sorrows, we know the world too well for that. We are

splitting into pieces, and of course that is gain to you. Take

another cigar." This polite, fashionable, and certainly comfortable

way of looking at the matter had never been attained at New York or

Philadelphia, at Boston or Chicago. The northern provincial world

of the States had declared to itself that those who were not with

it were against it; that its neighbours should be either friends or

foes; that it would understand nothing of neutrality. This was often

mortifying to me, but I think I liked it better on the whole than the

_laisser-aller_ indifference of Washington.

Everybody acknowledged that society in Washington had been almost

destroyed by the loss of the southern half of the usual sojourners in

the city. The senators and members of Government, who heretofore had

come from the southern States, had no doubt spent more money in the

capital than their northern brethren. They and their families had

been more addicted to social pleasures. They are the descendants of

the old English Cavaliers, whereas the northern men have come from

the old English Roundheads. Or if, as may be the case, the blood

of the races has now been too well mixed to allow of this being

said with absolute truth, yet something of the manners of the old

forefathers has been left. The southern gentleman is more genial,

less dry,--I will not say more hospitable, but more given to enjoy

hospitality than his northern brother; and this difference is quite

as strong with the women as with the men. It may therefore be

understood that secession would be very fatal to the society of

Washington. It was not only that the members of Congress were not

there. As to very many of the representatives, it may be said that

they do not belong sufficiently to Washington to make a part of its

society. It is not every representative that is, perhaps, qualified

to do so. But secession had taken away from Washington those who

held property in the South--who were bound to the South by any ties,

whether political or other; who belonged to the South by blood,

education, and old habits. In very many cases--nay, in most such

cases--it had been necessary that a man should select whether he

would be a friend to the South, and therefore a rebel; or else an

enemy to the South, and therefore untrue to all the predilections and

sympathies of his life. Here has been the hardship. For such people

there has been no neutrality possible. Ladies even have not been able

to profess themselves simply anxious for peace and goodwill, and so

to remain tranquil. They who are not for me are against me, has been

spoken by one side and by the other. And I suppose that in all civil

war it is necessary that it should be so. I heard of various cases

in which father and son had espoused different sides in order that

property might be retained both in the North and in the South. Under

such circumstances it may be supposed that society in Washington

would be considerably cut up. All this made the place somewhat

melancholy.

North America — Volume 2 · 第 1 / 17 章