CHAPTER VII.

PERSECUTIONS AND MARTYRDOMS.

A Peace of Twenty-eight Years--Flourishing State--Bersour--A

Martyr--Martyrdom of Pastor Gonin--Martyrdoms of a Student

and a Monk--Trial and Burning of a Colporteur--A List of

Horrible Deaths--The Valleys under the Sway of France--

Restored to Savoy--Emmanuel Philibert--Persecution

Renewed--Carignano--Persecution Approaches the Mountains--

Deputation to the Duke--The Old Paths--Remonstrance to the

Duke--to the Duchess--to the Council.

The Church of the Alps had peace for twenty-eight years. This was

a time of great spiritual prosperity. Sanctuaries arose in all her

Valleys; her pastors and teachers were found too few, and men of

learning and zeal, some of them from foreign lands, pressed into

her service. Individuals and families in the cities on the plain of

Piedmont embraced her faith; and the crowds that attended her worship

were continually growing.[41] In short, this venerable Church had

a second youth. Her lamp, retrimmed, burned with a brightness that

justified her time-honoured motto, “A light shining in darkness.” The

darkness was not now so deep as it had been; the hours of night were

drawing to a close. Nor was the Vaudois community the only light that

now shone in Christendom. It was one of a constellation of lights,

whose brilliance was beginning to irradiate the skies of the Church

with an effulgence which no former age had known.

The exemption from persecution, which the Waldenses enjoyed during this

period, was not absolute, but comparative. The lukewarm are seldom

molested; and the quickened zeal of the Vaudois brought with it a

revival of the persecutor’s malignity, though it did not find vent in

violences so dreadful as the tempests that had lately smitten them.

Only two years after the synod--that is, in 1534--wholesale destruction

fell upon the Vaudois Churches of Provence; but the sad story of their

extinction will more appropriately be told elsewhere. In the valleys of

Piedmont events were from time to time occurring that showed that the

inquisitor’s vengeance had been scotched, not killed. While the Vaudois

as a race were prosperous, their churches multiplying, and their faith

extending its geographical area from one year to another, individual

Vaudois were being at times seized, and put to death, at the stake, on

the rack, or by the cord.

Three years after, the persecution broke out anew, and raged for a

short time. Charles III. of Savoy, a prince of mild manners, but under

the rule of the priests, being solicited by the Archbishop of Turin and

the inquisitor of the same city, gave his consent to “hunting down” the

heretics of the Valleys. The commission was given to a nobleman of the

name of Bersour, whose residence was at Pinerolo, near the entrance of

the Valley of Perosa. Bersour, a man of savage disposition, collected

a troop of 500 horse and foot, and attacked the Valley of Angrogna. He

was repulsed, but the storm which had rolled away from the mountains

fell upon the plains. Turning to the Vaudois who resided around his

own residence, he seized a great number of persons, whom he threw into

the prisons and convents of Pinerolo and the Inquisition of Turin.

Many of them suffered in the flames. One of these martyrs, Catalan

Girard, quaintly taught the spectators a parabolic lesson, standing

at the pile. From amid the flames he asked for two stones, which were

instantly brought him. The crowd looked on in silence, curious to know

what he meant to do with them. Rubbing them against each other, he

said, “You think to extinguish our poor Churches by your persecutions.

You can no more do so, than I with my feeble hands can crush these

stones.”[42]

Heavier tempests seemed about to descend, when suddenly the sky cleared

above the confessors of the Alps. It was a change in the politics of

Europe in this instance, as in many others, that stayed the arm of

persecution. Francis I. of France demanded of Charles, Duke of Savoy,

permission to march an army through his dominions. The object of the

French king was the recovery of the Duchy of Milan, a long-contested

prize between himself and Charles V. The Duke of Savoy refused the

request of his brother monarch; but reflecting that the passes of the

Alps were in the hands of the men whom he was persecuting, and that

should he continue his oppressions, the Vaudois might open the gates

of his kingdom to the enemy, he sent orders to Bersour to stop the

persecution in the Valleys.

In 1536, the Waldensian Church had to mourn the loss of one of the

more distinguished of her pastors. Martin Gonin, of Angrogna--a man of

public spirit and rare gifts--who had gone to Geneva on ecclesiastical

affairs, was returning through Dauphiné, when he was apprehended on

suspicion of being a spy. He cleared himself of that charge, but the

gaoler searching his person, and discovering certain papers upon him,

he was convicted of what the Parliament of Grenoble accounted a much

greater crime--heresy. Condemned to die, he was led forth at night,

and drowned in the river Isère. He would have suffered at the stake

had not his persecutors feared the effect of his dying words upon the

spectators.[43]

There were others, also called to ascend the martyr-pile, whose names

we must not pass over in silence. Two pastors returning from Geneva to

their flocks in the Valleys, in company of three French Protestants,

were seized at the Col de Tamiers, in Savoy, and carried to Chambéry.

There all five were tried, condemned, and burned. The fate of Nicolas

Sartoire is yet more touching. He was a student of theology at Geneva,

and held one of those bursaries which the Lords of Bern had allotted

for the training of young men as pastors in the Churches of the

Valleys. He set out to spend his holiday with his family in Piedmont.

We know how Vaudois heart yearns for its native mountains; nor would

the coming of the youth awaken less lively anticipations on the part

of his friends. The paternal threshold, alas! he was never to cross;

his native Valleys he was to tread no more. Travelling by the pass of

St. Bernard, and the grand valley of Aosta, he had just passed the

Italian frontier, when he was apprehended on the suspicion of heresy.

It was the month of May, when all was life and beauty in the vales and

mountains around him; he himself was in the spring-time of existence;

it was hard to lay down life at such a moment; but the great captain

from whose feet he had just come, had taught him that the first duty

of a soldier of Christ is obedience. He confessed his Lord, nor could

promises or threats--and both were tried--make him waver. He continued

steadfast unto the end, and on the 4th of May, 1557, he was brought

forth from his dungeon at Aosta, and burned alive.[44]

The martyr who died thus heroically at Aosta was a youth, the one we

are now to contemplate was a man of fifty. Geofroi Varaile was a native

of the town of Busco, in Piedmont. His father had been a captain in

that army of murderers who, in 1488, ravaged the Valleys of Lucerna

and Angrogna. The son in 1520 became a monk, and possessing the gift

of a rare eloquence, he was sent on a preaching tour, in company with

another cowled ecclesiastic, yet more famous, Bernardo Ochino of

Sienna, the founder of the order of the Capuchins. The arguments of the

men he was sent to convert staggered Varaile. He fled to Geneva, and in

the city of the Reformers he was taught more fully the “way of life.”

Ordained as a pastor, he returned to the Valleys, where “like another

Paul,” says Leger, “he preached the faith he once destroyed.” After a

ministry of some months, he set out to pay a visit of a few days to

his native town of Busco. He was apprehended by the monks who were

lying in wait for him. He was condemned to death by the Inquisition of

Turin. His execution took place in the castle-piazza of the same city,

March 29th, 1558. He walked to the place where he was to die with a

firm step and a serene countenance; he addressed the vast multitude

around his pile in a way that drew tears from many eyes; after this, he

began to sing with a loud voice, and so continued till he sank amid the

flames.[45]

Two years before this, the same piazza, the castle-yard at Turin, had

witnessed a similar spectacle. Barthelemy Hector was a bookseller in

Poictiers. A man of warm but well-tempered zeal, he travelled as far as

the Valleys, diffusing that knowledge that maketh wise unto salvation.

In the assemblage of white peaks that look down on the Pra del Tor is

one named La Vêchera, so called because the cows love the rich grass

that clothes its sides in summer-time. Barthelemy Hector would take

his seat on the slopes of the mountain, and gathering the herdsmen

and agriculturists of the Pra round him, would induce them to buy his

books, by reading passages to them. Portions of the Scriptures also

would he recite to the grandames and maidens as they watched their

goats, or plied the distaff. His steps were tracked by the inquisitor,

even amid these wild solitudes. He was dragged to Turin, to answer for

the crime of selling Genevese books. His defence before his judges

discovered an admirable courage and wisdom.

“You have been caught in the act,” said his judge, “of selling books

that contain heresy. What say you?”

“If the Bible is heresy to you, it is truth to me,” replied the

prisoner.

“But you use the Bible to deter men from going to mass,” urged the

judge.

“If the Bible deters men from going to mass,” responded Barthelemy, “it

is a proof that God disapproves of it, and that the mass is idolatry.”

The judge, deeming it expedient to make short shrift with such a

heretic, exclaimed, “Retract.”

“I have spoken only truth,” said the bookseller, “can I change truth as

I would a garment?”

His judges kept him some months in prison, in the hope that his

recantation would save them the necessity of burning him. This

unwillingness to have resort to the last penalty was owing to no

feeling of pity for the prisoner, but entirely to the conviction

that these repeated executions were endangering the cause of their

Church. “The smoke of these martyr-piles,” as was said with reference

to the death of Patrick Hamilton, “was infecting those on whom it

blew.” But the constancy of Barthelemy compelled his persecutors to

disregard these prudential considerations. At last, despairing of his

abjuration, they brought him forth and consigned him to the flames. His

behaviour at the stake “drew rivers of tears,” says Leger, “from the

eyes of many in the Popish crowd around his stake, while others vented

reproaches and invectives against the cruelty of the monks and the

inquisitors.”[46]

These are only a few of the many martyrs by whom, even during this

period of comparative peace and prosperity, the Church of the Valleys

was called to testify against Rome. Some of these martyrs perished

by cruel, barbarous, and most horrible methods. To recite all these

cases would be beyond our purpose, and to depict the revolting and

infamous details would be to narrate what no reader could peruse. We

shall quote only part of the brief summary of Muston. “There is no

town in Piedmont,” says he, “under a Vaudois pastor, where some of our

brethren have not been put to death.... Hugo Chiamps of Finestrelle had

his entrails torn from his living body, at Turin. Peter Geymarali of

Bobbio, in like manner, had his entrails taken out at Lucerna, and a

fierce cat thrust in their place to torture him further; Maria Romano

was buried alive at Rocco-patia; Magdalen Foulano underwent the same

fate at San Giovanni; Susan Michelini was bound hand and foot, and left

to perish of cold and hunger at Saracena. Bartholomew Fache, gashed

with sabres, had the wounds filled up with quicklime, and perished thus

in agony at Fenile; Daniel Michelini had his tongue torn out at Bobbio

for having praised God. James Baridari perished covered with sulphurous

matches, which had been forced into his flesh under the nails, between

the fingers, in the nostrils, in the lips, and over all his body, and

then lighted. Daniel Revelli had his mouth filled with gunpowder,

which, being lighted, blew his head to pieces. Maria Monnen, taken at

Liousa, had the flesh cut from her cheek and chin bone, so that her

jaw was left bare, and she was thus left to perish. Paul Garnier was

slowly sliced to pieces at Rora. Thomas Margueti was mutilated in an

indescribable manner at Miraboco, and Susan Jaquin cut in bits at La

Torre. Sara Rostagnol was slit open from the legs to the bosom, and so

left to perish on the road between Eyral and Lucerna. Anne Charbonnier

was impaled and carried thus on a pike, as a standard, from San

Giovanni to La Torre. Daniel Rambaud, at Paesano, had his nails torn

off, then his fingers chopped off, then his feet and his hands, then

his arms and his legs, with each successive refusal on his part to

abjure the Gospel.”[47] Thus the roll of martyrs runs on, and with each

new sufferer comes a new, a more excruciating and more horrible mode of

torture and death.

We have already mentioned the demand which the King of France made

upon the Duke of Savoy, Charles III., that he would permit him to

march an army through his territories. The reply was a refusal;

but Francis I. must needs have a road into Italy. Accordingly he

seized upon Piedmont, and held possession of it, together with the

Waldensian valleys, for twenty-three years. The Waldenses had found

the sway of Francis I. more tolerant than that of their own princes;

for though Francis hated Lutheranism, the necessities of his policy

often compelled him to court the Lutherans, and so it came to pass

that while he was burning heretics in Paris he spared them in the

Valleys. But the general peace of Château Cambrésis, April 3rd, 1559,

restored Piedmont, with the exception of Turin, to its former rulers

of the House of Savoy.[48] Charles III. had been succeeded in 1553 by

Emmanuel Philibert. Philibert was a prince of superior talents and

humane disposition, and the Vaudois cherished the hope that under him

they would be permitted to live in peace, and to worship as their

fathers had done. What strengthened these just expectations was the

fact that Philibert had married a sister of the King of France, Henry

II., who had been carefully instructed in the Protestant faith by her

illustrious relations, Margaret, Queen of Navarre, and Rénée of France,

daughter of Louis XII. But, alas! the treaty that restored Emmanuel

Philibert to the throne of his ancestors, contained a clause binding

the contracting parties to extinguish heresy. This was to send him

back to his subjects with a dagger in his hand.

Whatever the king might incline--and, strengthened by the counsels

of his Protestant queen, he would doubtless, if he could, have dealt

humanely by his faithful subjects, the Vaudois--his intentions were

overborne by men of stronger wills and more determined resolves. The

inquisitors of his kingdom, the nuncio of the Pope, and the ambassadors

of Spain and France, united in urging upon him the purgation of his

dominions, in terms of the agreement in the Treaty of Peace. The

unhappy monarch, unable to resist these powerful solicitations, issued

on the 15th February, 1560, an edict forbidding his subjects to hear

the Protestant preachers in the Valley of Lucerna, or anywhere else,

under pain of a fine of 100 dollars of gold for the first offence, and

of the galleys for life for the second. This edict had reference mainly

to the Protestants on the plain of Piedmont, who resorted in crowds

to hear sermon in the Valleys. There followed, however, in a short

time, a yet severer edict, commanding attendance at mass under pain

of death. To carry out this cruel decree, a commission was given to a

prince of the blood, Philip of Savoy, Count de Raconis, and with him

was associated George Costa, Count de la Trinita, and Thomas Jacomel,

the Inquisitor-General, a man as cruel in disposition as he was

licentious in manners. To these was added a certain Councillor Corbis,

but he was not of the stuff which the business required, and so, after

witnessing a few initial scenes of barbarity and horror, he resigned

his commission.[49]

The first burst of the tempest fell on Carignano. This town reposes

sweetly on one of the spurs of the Apennines, about twenty miles to

the south-west of Turin. It contained many Protestants, some of whom

were of good position. The wealthiest were selected and dragged to the

burning-pile, in order to strike terror into the rest. The blow had not

fallen in vain; the professors of the Protestant creed in Carignano

were scattered; some fled to Turin, then under the domination of

France, some to other places, and some, alas! frightened by the tempest

in front, turned back and sought refuge in the darkness behind them.

They had desired the “better country,” but could not enter in at the

cost of exile and death.

Having done its work in Carignano, this desolating tempest held its

way across the plain of Piedmont, towards those great mountains which

were the ancient fortress of the truth, marking its track through the

villages and country communes in terror, in pillage, and blood. It

moved like one of those thunder-clouds which the traveller on the Alps

may often descry beneath him, traversing the same plain, and shooting

its lightnings earthwards as it advances. Wherever it was known that

there was a Vaudois congregation, thither did the cloud turn. And now

we behold it at the foot of the Waldensian Alps--at the entrance of the

Valleys, within whose mighty natural bulwarks crowds of fugitives from

the towns and villages on the plain have already found asylum.

Rumours of the confiscations, arrests, cruel tortures, and horrible

deaths which had befallen the Churches at the foot of their mountains,

had preceded the appearance of the crusaders at the entrance of the

Valleys. The same devastation which had befallen the flourishing

Churches on the plain of Piedmont, seemed to impend over the Churches

in the bosom of the Alps. At this juncture the pastors and leading

laymen assembled to deliberate on the steps to be taken. Having fasted

and humbled themselves before God, they sought by earnest prayer the

direction of his Holy Spirit.[50] They resolved to approach the throne

of their prince, and by humble remonstrance and petition, set forth the

state of their affairs and the justice of their cause. Their first

claim was to be heard before being condemned--a right denied to no

one accused, however criminal. They next solemnly disclaimed the main

offence laid to their charge, that of departing from the true faith,

and of adopting doctrines unknown to the Scriptures, and the early ages

of the Church. Their faith was that which Christ Himself had taught;

which the apostles, following their Great Master, had preached; which

the Fathers had vindicated with their pens, and the martyrs with their

blood, and which the first four Councils had ratified, and proclaimed

to be the faith of the Christian world. From the “old paths,” the Bible

and all antiquity being witnesses, they had never turned aside; from

father to son they had continued these 1,500 years to walk therein.

Their mountains shielded no novelties; they had bowed the knee to no

strange gods, and, if they were heretics, so too were the first four

Councils; and so too were the apostles themselves. If they erred, it

was in the company of the confessors and martyrs of the early ages.

They were willing any moment to appeal their cause to a General

Council, provided that Council were willing to decide the question by

the only infallible standard they knew, the Word of God. If on this

evidence they should be convicted of even one heresy, most willingly

would they surrender it. On this, the main point of their indictment,

what more could they promise? Show us, they said, what the errors are

which you ask us to renounce under the penalty of death, and you shall

not need to ask a second time.[51]

Their duty to God did not weaken their allegiance to their prince. To

piety they added loyalty. The throne before which they now stood had

not more faithful and devoted subjects than they. When had they plotted

treason, or disputed lawful command of their sovereign? Nay, the more

they feared God, the more they honoured the king. Their services, their

substance, their life, were all at the disposal of their prince; they

were willing to lay them all down in defence of his lawful prerogative;

one thing only they could not surrender--their conscience.

As regarded their Romanist fellow-subjects of Piedmont, they had lived

in good-neighbourhood with them. Whose person had they injured--whose

property had they robbed--whom had they over-reached in their bargains?

Had they not been kind, courteous, honest? If their hills had vied

in fertility with the naturally richer plains at their feet, and if

their mountain-homes had been filled with store of corn, and oil, and

wine, not always found in Piedmontese dwellings, to what was this

owing, save to their superior industry, frugality, and skill? Never had

marauding expedition descended from their hills to carry off the goods

of their neighbours, or to inflict retaliation for the many murders

and robberies to which they had had to submit. Why, then, should their

neighbours rise against them to exterminate them, as if they were a

horde of evildoers, in whose neighbourhood no man could live in peace;

and why should their sovereign unsheathe the sword against those who

had never been found disturbers of his kingdom, nor plotters against

his government, but who, on the contrary, had ever striven to maintain

the authority of his law, and the honour of his throne? “One thing is

certain, most serene prince,” they said, in conclusion, “that the Word

of God will not perish, but will abide for ever. If, then, our religion

is the pure Word of God, as we are persuaded it is, and not a human

invention, no human power will be able to abolish it.”[52]

Never was there a more solemn, or a more just, or a more respectful

remonstrance presented to any throne. The wrong about to be done them

was enormous, yet not an angry word, nor a single accusatory sentence,

do the Vaudois permit themselves to utter. But to what avail this

solemn protest, this triumphant vindication? The more complete and

conclusive it is, the more manifest does it make the immense injustice

and the flagrant criminality of the House of Savoy. The more the

Vaudois put themselves in the right, the more they put the Church of

Rome in the wrong; and they who have already doomed them to perish are

but the more resolutely determined to carry out their purpose.

This document was accompanied by two others: one to the queen, and one

to the Council. The one to the queen is differently conceived from that

to the duke. They offer no apology for their faith: the queen herself

was of it. They allude in a few touching terms to the sufferings they

had already been subjected to, and to the yet greater that appeared

to impend. This was enough, they knew, to awaken all her sympathies,

and enlist her as their advocate with the king, after the example of

Esther, and other noble women in former times, who valued their lofty

station less for its dazzling honours, than for the opportunities it

gave them of shielding the persecuted confessors of the truth.[53]

The remonstrance presented to the Council was couched in terms more

plain and direct, yet still respectful. They bade the counsellors of

the king beware what they did; they warned them that every drop of

innocent blood they should spill they would one day have to account

for; that if the blood of Abel, though only that of one man, cried with

a voice so loud that God heard it in heaven, and came down to call its

shedder to a reckoning, how much mightier the cry that would arise from

the blood of a whole nation, and how much more terrible the vengeance

with which it would be visited! In fine, they reminded the Council that

what they asked was not an unknown privilege in Piedmont, nor would

they be the first or the only persons who had enjoyed that indulgence

if it should be extended to them. Did not the Jew and the Saracen live

unmolested in their cities? Did they not permit the Israelite to build

his synagogue, and the Moor to read his Koran, without annoyance or

restraint? Was it a great thing that the faith of the Bible should be

placed on the same level in this respect with that of the Crescent,

and that the descendants of the men who for generations had been the

subjects of the House of Savoy, and who had enriched the dominions with

their virtues, and defended them with their blood, should be treated

with the same humanity that was shown to the alien and the unbeliever?

These petitions the confessors of the Alps dispatched to the proper

quarter, and having done so, they waited an answer with eyes lifted up

to heaven. If that answer should be peace, with what gratitude to God

and to their prince would they hail it! should it be otherwise, they

were ready to accept that alternative too; they were prepared to die.

History of the Waldenses · 第 7 / 18 章