MR. DENMAN.

My Lord, I am with the two learned gentlemen who have preceded me; and I

would merely observe, that the affidavits which we might have been

expected to offer upon this occasion, in support of the line of defence

which we pursued, and which the learned serjeant has stated, could not

properly be addressed to the court, because they must have gone in

contravention to the verdict of the jury. At the same time I may be

permitted to say, it is extremely singular, that in the two plans to

affect this mischief, in each of which so many persons were concerned,

and where so much assiduity has been employed, no one circumstance of

connection between them has been discovered but that which was stated by

the learned serjeant. What M'Rae might communicate was no evidence

against these defendants; no doubt Mr. Cochrane Johnstone gave his

sanction to that communication, by offering to contribute to the reward

for which M'Rae stipulated; but Mr. Johnstone's acts are no evidence

against these defendants. It is most unfortunate for them, that M'Rae,

who appears to have been connected with Mr. Johnstone in one part of the

affair, has appeared to be connected with them in the other part. It

will perhaps occur to your Lordships to enquire why I state these

things, seeing there is an admission of something criminal. I state

them, because I think they do afford an argument in mitigation of

punishment; because I think they will lead to the conclusion in your

Lordships minds, that had these defendants been aware of the whole

extent of mischief which was to be carried into effect, they probably

would not have joined in it. Your Lordship put it to the jury, at the

trial, that it was not necessary all the actors in the drama should know

the part assigned to each,--that it was enough they had each contributed

to the general object.

_Lord Ellenborough._ That they were parties to the general object, and

co-operating to effect it.

_Mr. Denman._ But your Lordship particularly stated, it was not

necessary that the jury should arrive at the precise degree of

participation and extent of criminality. I humbly conceive, the extent

of criminality, as affecting these defendants, is, in comparison with

the others, very small; and I trust your Lordships, considering their

degree of guilt, will proportionably moderate the degree of their

punishment. In the case of conspiracy, the law itself inflicts a most

severe and heavy judgment; and in pronouncing that sentence which must

come from your Lordship's lips, I have no doubt, the considerations

which attach themselves to it, will not be overlooked.

The Trial of Charles Random de Berenger, Sir Thomas Cochrane, commonly called Lord Cochrane, the Hon. Andrew Cochrane Johnstone, Richard Gathorne Butt, Ralph Sandom, Alexander M'Rae, John Peter Holloway, and Henry Lyte for A Conspiracy In the Court of King's Bench, Guildhall, on Wednesday the 8th, and Thursday the 9th of June, 1814 · 第 42 / 53 题