MR. JUSTICE LE BLANC,

The motion in arrest of judgment has been made upon three grounds; the

first, that it is no crime in itself to raise the price of the public

funds, and that we are to look to the indictment to see what is the

mischief charged. The charge in the indictment is a conspiracy by false

rumours to raise the price of the public funds on a particular day. I

admit that the simple fact of raising or lowering the public funds is no

crime. A man having a necessary occasion to sell a large sum out of the

stocks, though it may have the effect of depressing the funds on that

day; or to purchase a large sum, though he thereby raises the funds,

commits no offence. But if a number of persons conspire to raise the

funds on a particular day by spreading false rumours, that is an

offence, and the offence consists in raising the funds by false rumours

on that day, not in the simple act of raising the funds.

The next objection is, that the indictment states a purpose to defraud,

without naming the persons who were to be defrauded. From the nature of

the case, persons could not be named; the offence was a conspiracy on a

previous day, to raise the price of the funds upon a future day. It was

therefore uncertain who would be the purchasers; but the object was,

that the price of the funds should be raised to all who should become

purchasers on that day, and could not be aimed at particular

individuals. The offence was general, in the same manner as if a false

rumour were spread previous to a market-day, to raise the price of some

commodity which should be brought to market.

A further objection is, that the indictment refers to the funds of _this

kingdom_, and that since the Union, this kingdom can only mean the

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. But although particular

sums may be applied to the particular service of one or the other part

of the United Kingdom, yet the public funds of either part are funds of

the United Kingdom, and go in furtherance of the general service of the

United Kingdom. It appears to me there is no reason why this judgment

should be arrested.

The Trial of Charles Random de Berenger, Sir Thomas Cochrane, commonly called Lord Cochrane, the Hon. Andrew Cochrane Johnstone, Richard Gathorne Butt, Ralph Sandom, Alexander M'Rae, John Peter Holloway, and Henry Lyte for A Conspiracy In the Court of King's Bench, Guildhall, on Wednesday the 8th, and Thursday the 9th of June, 1814 · 第 34 / 53 题