1. _Genus_--BALANUS, Auct.[83]

[83] The name Balanus was used, almost as at present, by Lister and

Hill, before the introduction of the binomial system. Since that

period the first two authors, as far as I know, who used this name,

were Da Costa, in his 'Hist. Nat. Test. Brit.,' in 1778; and Bock,

in the 'Naturforscher,' for the same year; Bock, however, applied

it to a Chelonobia.

CONOPEA (pars generis). _Say._ Journal Nat. Sc. Philadelphia, vol.

ii, part ii, 1822.

MESSULA (do.). _Leach._ Zoological Journal, vol. ii, 1825.

CHIRONA (do.). _J. E. Gray._ Philosoph. Transacts., 1835, p. 37.

_Compartments six; basis calcareous or membranous; opercular valves

sub-triangular._

_Distribution._--Mundane: in the warmer seas.

_General appearance._--The shape of the shell in the different

species varies from depressed conical to cylindrical; the latter

form being generally assumed when specimens are crowded together; but

some species, as _B. balanoides_, _crenatus_, and _lævis_, seem more

subject than others to be thus affected. The colour is either white,

generally tinted by the yellowish or brownish epidermis, or any colour

intermediate between bright pink and rich blue, purple being the

prevailing tint. The persistence of the so-called epidermis is very

different in different species, being even sometimes highly variable in

the same species. The surface is either smooth or more commonly folded

longitudinally, or sharply ribbed. The orifice differs in form from

diamond-shape to trigonal; the carinal end, owing to the shape of the

carina, being always sharper or narrower than the rostral end. The size

of the orifice, in proportion to the shell, varies accordingly as the

latter is more or less conical or cylindrical. The orifice is either

entire or more or less deeply toothed, in proportion to the degree of

obliquity of the summits of the radii and alæ. The radii almost always

have smoother surfaces than the parietes. In some few species the

radii are not developed, the sutures being marked only by fissure-like

lines; in others they are very narrow, and in this case their upper

margins are generally rounded and smooth, instead of being straight

and jagged. The carino-lateral compartments are usually much narrower

than the lateral compartments, occasionally in an extreme degree, as in

_B. allium_. The shell is generally strong, sometimes to a wonderful

degree; but the strength and thickness vary in the individuals of some

of the species. By the action of hot caustic potash, the compartments

in several species, such as _B. Hameri_ and _crenatus_, separate on a

touch; in others, they adhere so strongly as to prove that the sutures

must be calcified together. In this genus we have the largest known

sessile cirripede, viz., the _B. psittacus_, and on the other hand many

small species; but it is very difficult, except in well-known species,

to ascertain the average or even the maximum dimensions.

_Scutum._--This valve is almost triangular, with the basi-tergal corner

more or less rounded off. The prominent lines of growth are sometimes

crossed by longitudinal striæ. Internally, the articular ridge projects

to a very different degree in the different species; its lower end is

sometimes (as in _B. lævis_, Pl. 4, fig. 2 _c_) produced downwards as a

small, sharp, free style; there is always an articular furrow receiving

the inflected margin of the tergum. There is always an impression left

by the attachment of the adductor scutorum muscle; and often its lower

side is bounded more or less closely by a sharp adductor ridge, running

some way down the valve; this ridge is occasionally almost confluent,

in its upper part, with the articular ridge, and in this case sometimes

it forms, together with the inflected tergal margin, a large tubular

cavity, running up, as in _B. psittacus_ (Pl. 2, fig. 3 _c_), almost

to the apex of the valve. Almost invariably there is a slight pit or

depression for the lateral depressor muscle; sometimes within the

depression there is a little ridge, as in _B. perforatus_ and _nubilus_

(Pl. 4, fig. 3 _a_, and Pl. 6, fig. 2 _a_); and in the case of _B.

vestitus_, _flosculus_, and _imperator_ (Pl. 8, figs. 3 _a_, 4 _a_),

there are regular crests for this same purpose. The rostral depressor

muscle is usually attached in a small pit formed by the folding over of

the lower part of the occludent margin: in _B. imperator_ (Pl. 8, fig.

4 _a_) there are regular crests for its attachment, and traces of them

may be discovered in _B. vestitus_.

_Tergum._--This valve is more nearly triangular than any other shape,

with the spur more or less prominent. The apex generally projects a

little above the level of the scutum; in some species it consists of

a triangular and solid, in others (Pl. 2, fig. 3 _b_) of an almost

cylindrical, extremely sharp, inwardly curved, and very prominent beak.

This beak is generally purple; it is sometimes hollow, and occupied by

a thread of corium. Its formation, and the apparent sliding up of the

whole tergum, so as to project above the scutum, has been described

under the family. From an account given to me by a person who kept

_B. porcatus_ alive, the beaks appear to be used, when the operculum

is touched, as an organ of defence,--the animal striking with them.

The tergal margin is more or less inflected; and the carinal margin

is convex in different degrees, and, in some species, is added to

by upturned zones of growth. The basal margin either forms a nearly

straight line on opposite sides of the spur, or more commonly slopes

towards it in various manners. The spur, or basal projection, is

rarely placed in the middle of the basal margin, generally near,

sometimes close to the basi-scutal angle; it varies much in length

and breadth, and is sometimes even half the width of the valve. The

surface of the valve is almost always more or less depressed, sometimes

so much as to form a deepish furrow, the "longitudinal furrow," which

extends from the apex to the extremity of the spur. When the furrow is

deep, its sides, as the specimen grows old, almost always become folded

inwards, so as to touch, and then the furrow becomes converted into a

closed fissure: in this latter case the folded sides generally form a

central crest on the spur. Internally, in the middle of the upper part

of the valve, the articular ridge is more or less prominent, forming

the carinal margin of the articular furrow, in which the articular

ridge of the scutum is lodged; occasionally, however, this articular

ridge can hardly be said to exist. In most species the tergal depressor

muscle is attached to sharp crests on the basi-carinal corner of the

valve, but these are almost obliterated in other species.

_Compartments._--The external appearance of the shell has already been

described. In the most typical species, the parietes consist of an

outer and inner lamina, separated by strong longitudinal septa; these

septa are denticulated on both sides at their bases, but only close

to the inner lamina; in fact the inner lamina is apparently formed by

the union, thickening, and production, of some of the denticuli. As

it is not the innermost of the denticuli on the basal edges of the

longitudinal septa, which thus become united into a solid layer, the

longitudinal septa form slightly projecting, longitudinal ribs on the

inner lamina. These internal ribs are longitudinally striated; in

old specimens they often become obliterated, especially in the upper

part of the shell. The parietal tubes or pores (occupied by threads

of corium) are generally square and large; but in _B. Ajax_ they

are very small, and in _B. glandula_ often extremely minute. In the

upper part of the shell, and sometimes low down, they are generally

crossed by thin, transverse, calcareous septa: in some species, as

in _B. perforatus_, and in some varieties of _B. amphitrite_, the

upper ends of the tubes are filled up solidly with shell. In some

varieties of _B. crenatus_ and of _amphitrite_, the longitudinal septa,

near the outer lamina, divide, thus giving rise to a very imperfect

row of outer short tubes. In _B. vinaceus_ (Pl. 2, fig. 7 _d_) the

inner lamina is cancellated instead of being solid, which is caused

by the basal denticuli of the longitudinal septa being simply united

together by their ends and crossed by transverse septa, instead of

being consolidated into a mass. In several species, as in _B. Hameri_,

the walls consist only of the outer lamina with longitudinal ribs, no

inner lamina having been formed; the ribs here evidently answer to the

longitudinal septa in the foregoing species. In _B. flosculus_ and

_imperator_ the walls are solid, their basal margins being formed of

irregular, elongated points, and little ridges (Pl. 8, fig. 4 _c_),

which apparently prefigure the more regular longitudinal ribs or septa.

In _B. balanoides_ the walls are generally either nearly smooth and

solid, or irregularly cancellated; in _B. cariosus_ (Pl. 7, fig. 3 _b_)

two or three rows of short irregular tubes are formed by unequally

branching septa, almost as in the genus _Tetraclita_.

The _Radii_, in all the species, are constructed essentially on the

same plan as the parietes; thus, in the typical forms, there is an

outer and inner lamina, with septa, which, near the inner lamina, are

furnished with denticuli on both sides; hence the radii are permeated

by pores or tubes, like the parietes; but this holds good only in the

first section of the genus, for, in the other species, the tubes are

filled up quite solidly. The denticuli on the septa often occur only on

one side, or disappear altogether; and, lastly, the septa themselves

often appear merely like little teeth, or disappear altogether as in

_B. Hameri_, or occur only near the bases of the radii, as in _B.

amaryllis_. A slight furrow in the compartment, against which each

radius abuts, is generally marked by the septa and their denticuli. In

regard to the _alæ_, their lateral or sutural edges are either thin

and smooth, or, more commonly, finely crenated or ribbed. The little

transverse crenations are homologous with the septa in the radii and

parietes. The edges of the alæ are usually received in a furrow. The

diametric growth of the shell is effected by the growth of the radii

and alæ, and chiefly by that of the former. The sutural and lateral

edges of both radii and alæ are added to, either quite up to their

summits, or only low down, and during the continued growth of the

shell, lower and lower down; in accordance with this difference in

growth, the summits of the radii and alæ become either very oblique,

or they extend parallel to the basis, that is, from tip to tip of the

adjoining compartments. When the radii and alæ are added to, as is most

usual, above the level of the opercular membrane, and therefore above

the sack, ribbons of corium run up the sutures from the sack, higher

or lower, according to the height to which, in the different species,

the edges of the radii and alæ continue to be added to. The obliquity

of the summits of the radii and alæ varies, in some cases, in the same

species. It often happens that when the summits of the radii are very

oblique, the summits of the alæ are but little so; and the converse;

both, however, are often either equally oblique, or both have square

summits. The _sheath_ extends either one third or more than half down

the shell; its basal margin often (Pl. 25, fig. 1, K′) freely depends

or overhangs the inner lamina of the walls.

_Basis._--In typical species the basis is calcareous, and consists of

an upper and lower lamina, separated by radiating septa, forming pores.

In the same manner as the septa of the parietes sometimes, though

rarely, become irregularly divided near the outer lamina, forming

outer pores, so it is, but in a much more marked degree, with the

basis. The basis in such cases becomes extremely thick, and consists

of an upper, thin lamina, with the regular radiating septa and pores,

and of an underlying, thick, cancellated mass, which seems wholly to

result from the dividing and sub-dividing of the septa. The basal

radiating pores, like the parietal pores, are closed at intervals by

calcareous transverse septa. The basal points of the parietal septa

enter the orifices of the basal pores, and the threads of corium pass

into the latter, between the denticuli of the parietal septa. In some

species, as in _B. crenatus_ and _Hameri_, the basis is perfectly

solid, the upper lamina being absent, just as in some species, the

internal lamina of the parietes is absent. In _B. flosculus_ the basis

is calcareous, but consists of so excessively thin a film as hardly

to be distinguished: it presents, moreover, as also is the case with

_B. imperator_, a beaded structure. Again, in some few species, as

in _B. balanoides_, the basis is simply membranous. When the basis

is thin, it is always flat, and is closely moulded to the irregular

surface of attachment; and in this case, when specimens are crowded

together, their elongation is effected exclusively by the growth of the

walls; but, when the basis is thick, it sometimes becomes, in crowded

groups, deeply, but irregularly, cup-formed, or cylindrical, as in _B.

psittacus_ and _perforatus_. In _B. allium_, however, which inhabits

massive corals, the basis is as regularly concave or cup-formed as

in the genus Pyrgoma: in _B. calceolus_ and its allies, and in some

varieties of the fossil _B. inclusus_, the basis is boat-formed, with

its lower surface deeply grooved longitudinally from clasping the

stem of the Gorgonia or other zoophyte, to which it was attached.

In certain varieties of _B. lævis_ it is very remarkable that the

deeply cup-formed basis becomes, owing apparently to the whole shell

having grown too deep for the animal, half-filled up with irregular,

calcareous, transverse plates (Pl. 4, fig. 2 _a_), resting one upon the

other by irregular points or pillars. The cementing apparatus has been

sufficiently described under the Family.

_Mouth._--The _labrum_ is always notched; sometimes it has no teeth,

but generally there are three on each side; in _B. balanoides_ there

are five or six on each side; and in _B. improvisus_ and _eburneus_

there is a whole row of teeth (Pl. 26, fig. 2, _e′_), graduated in

size, on each side of the notch. The _palpi_ are large, with their

apices nearly touching, and furnished with long spines. The _mandibles_

have, as it appears, normally, five teeth, but the two lower teeth

are always small and often rudimentary, and almost confluent with

the inferior, sometimes spinose angle. The _maxillæ_ have either a

simple edge, or a notch under the pair of large upper spines, or the

lower part forms (Pl. 26, fig. 7) a step-formed projection: there are

generally two lower spines, placed singly or not in pairs, larger than

the others, with the exception of the uppermost pair. The _outer

maxillæ_ are, on their inner faces, obscurely divided into two lobes.

_Cirri._--The rami of the first pair are unequal, the shorter one

sometimes not being more than half the length of the other ramus:

the segments of the shorter ramus are broad, and are, together with

the lower segments of the longer ramus, thickly clothed with spines;

in some species, as in _B. perforatus_, the anterior surfaces of the

segments, more especially of the shorter ramus, and of both rami of the

second pair are produced (Pl. 29, fig. 4), so as sometimes to form very

remarkable projections. The segments of the second and third pairs are

always thickly clothed with spines, as also are their pedicels. The

third pair is rather longer than the second; but in _B. vestitus_ and

_imperator_ it is much longer, and is otherwise somewhat different.

The dorsal and basal margin of the pedicel of the third pair, in some

of the species, as in _B. tintinnabulum_, is produced backwards on the

thorax, and forms a membranous plate fringed with fine spines. The

three posterior and longer pairs of cirri have from three to rarely

eight or ten pairs of long spines on each segment, with generally one

or two minute spines in the middle between each pair: their pedicels

have a regular double row of spines.

The _penis_ is long and hairy: in most of the species there is, at its

dorsal basis, a small, sharp, flattened, imperforate projection; first

observed by Poli: but this is sometimes absent, as in _B. crenatus_,

though present in the closely allied _B. balanoides_; and its presence

is variable in _B. tintinnabulum_. All the species have large plicated

_branchiæ_. The base of the _sack_ in several species is furnished

with inwardly projecting filamentary appendages. In _B. perforatus_,

_crenatus_, and _improvisus_, and I believe in other species, the upper

part of the _stomach_ is furnished with a circle of branching cæca.

_On the variation of the species_; _their arrangement and affinities_;

_value of the characters used_; _changes during growth_.--Owing to the

great variation in external characters, to which almost all the species

are subject, and likewise to the genus being a very natural one, that

is, to the species following each other in close and natural order, it

is not easy to exaggerate the difficulty of identifying the species,

except by a deliberate examination of the internal and external

structure of each individual specimen. Every one who has collected

sessile cirripedes must have perceived to what an extent their shape

depends on their position and grouping. The surface of attachment has

a great effect on that of the shell; for as the walls are added to at

their bases, every portion has at one time been in close contact with

the supporting surface; thus I have seen a strongly-ribbed species

(_B. porcatus_) and a nearly smooth species (_B. crenatus_) closely

resembling each other, and both having a peculiar appearance, owing

to their having been attached to a pecten. Dr. Gray has pointed out

to me specimens of _B. patellaris_, curiously pitted like the wood

to which they had adhered; and numberless other instances might be

added. Quite independently of the effect produced by the surface of

attachment, the degree to which the longitudinal folds and ribs are

developed on the parietes, is variable in most of the species, as in

_B. tintinnabulum_, _vestitus_, and even in _B. porcatus_; the presence

or entire absence of these ribs often surprisingly alters the whole

aspect of the shell. The persistence of the so-called epidermis is in

some degree variable; and in _B. lævis_ we have groups of specimens

absolutely naked, and others uniformly clothed with a brown membrane.

Again, some species in certain localities are all subject to the

disintegration of the entire outer lamina of the walls; and in such

cases (as with _B. perforatus_) there is not the smallest resemblance

between the corroded and perfect specimens. The size of the orifice,

and consequently of the operculum, compared with the shell itself,

varies accordingly as the shell is more or less conical or cylindrical;

in the latter case, the summits of the radii are generally more oblique

and the aperture consequently more deeply toothed than in the more

conical varieties. Size is a serviceable character in some cases, but

very many specimens are required to ascertain the average or maximum

size of each species, for there is no method of distinguishing a

half-grown from a full-grown specimen; and I believe, as long as the

individual lives, so long does it go on moulting and growing. _Colour_

is of very considerable service; though the precise tint varies greatly

in almost every species; and what is a far more serious evil, the

majority of the species have their white or nearly white varieties, the

latter sometimes as numerous as the coloured ones: in _B. perforatus_,

_lævis_, _flosculus_, _amphitrite_, and in several other species, the

common white varieties are eminently deceptive.

Besides the slight variation in the obliquity of the summits of the

radii and alæ, dependent on the more or less cylindrical form of

the shell, in some species, as in _B. tintinnabulum_, _amphitrite_,

_improvisus_, _trigonus_, and _porcatus_, their obliquity also varies

occasionally from unknown causes, and thus greatly affects the general

appearance of the shell. In some few species, as in _B. perforatus_,

the radii are often either not at all developed, or are of very

variable width; in others, when the shell has become cylindrical, or

when very old, the radii cease to grow, and from the disintegration of

the whole upper part of the shell, with the continued growth of the

lower part, the radii at last come to exist as mere fissures: I have

seen instances of this in _B. psittacus_, _nigrescens_, and _porcatus_.

Nevertheless, the obliquity of the upper margin, and the breadth of the

radii are useful characters; and still more useful is the fact whether

the upper margins are smooth and arched, or straight and jagged. The

fact of the terga being more or less beaked is useful: as is, likewise,

the presence of striæ, or furrows, or rows of pits, radiating from the

apices of the scuta; but to ascertain the presence of these marks,

it is almost invariably necessary to take out the scuta, clean, and

examine them with a lens; these ridges and furrows, moreover, in some

species, as is strikingly the case with _B. tintinnabulum_, and in

less degree with _B. trigonus_, _lævis_, and _concavus_, appear and

disappear, and vary without any apparent cause.

Now if we reflect that form, size, state and nature of the surface,

presence of epidermis, relative size of the orifice, presence of

longitudinal ribs, tint, and often the existence of any colour, are

all highly variable in most of the species; and that the obliquity

of the summits of the radii, and the presence of longitudinal striæ

on the scuta, are variable in several species; we shall perceive how

difficult it must ever be to distinguish the species from external

characters. As some evidence of this, I may mention that, after having

described nearly 40 species, and when my eye was naturally able to

appreciate small differences, I began carefully to examine varieties of

_B. tintinnabulum_, _amphitrite_, _improvisus_, _porcatus_, _vestitus_,

&c., without even a _suspicion_ that they belonged to these species, at

that time thoroughly well known to me; yet in the cases here referred

to, there could be no doubt, when a perfect series was examined,

that the specimens were only varieties. From this cause the labour

of naming a collection is great. Let no one attempt to identify the

species of this genus, without being prepared to disarticulate, clean,

and carefully examine with a microscope the basis and parietes, and

both the under and upper surfaces of the opercular valves; for I feel

convinced, that he will otherwise throw away much labour. Moreover, in

many cases, it is almost necessary, on account of the variability of

the characters, to possess several specimens. From these facts, I have

not hesitated to form my sections on characters which require close

examination, though I would gladly have seized on external characters,

could I have found such even moderately constant.

The least varying, and therefore most important characters, must

be taken from the internal structure of the parietes, radii, and

basis: not that these characters are absolutely invariable; thus the

porosity of the parietes is slightly variable in _B. glandula_, and

highly variable in the fossil _B. unguiformis_; it is also highly

variable in _B. balanoides_, but under a systematic point of view

this is unimportant, as the section including this latter species is

well defined by the membranous basis. The porosity of the basis is in

some degree variable in _B. nubilus_, _improvisus_, and _patellaris_;

and in _B. flosculus_ we see signs of a passage from a calcareous to

a membranous basis. Characters derived from the general shape, and

from the ridges and depressions on the under side of the scuta and

terga, especially of the scuta, are highly serviceable. The terga,

indeed, in many species, as in _B. amphitrite_, vary considerably,

and are affected by the general shape of the shell. Unfortunately the

differences are not very great between the scuta of the different

species. The cause of the opercular valves offering more useful

characters, as far as outline is concerned, than do the walls of

the shell, is no doubt due to their being almost independent of any

influence from the nature of the surface of attachment. Even the ridges

and depressions on the under side of the scuta, which are in direct

connection with the muscles and soft parts of the animal, vary to a

certain extent: thus the length and prominence of the adductor ridge

is decidedly variable in _B. concavus_ and _tintinnabulum_, and in a

less degree in _B. lævis_; the size and form of the little cavity for

the lateral depressor muscle varies in many species; so does the exact

shape and degree of prominence of the articular ridge. There is one

character in the terga, which at first would be thought very useful,

namely, whether an open longitudinal furrow, or a closed fissure

runs down the valve from the apex to the spur; but it is found that

the furrow almost always gradually closes up during growth; and as a

consequence of this, the width of the spur compared to that of the

whole valve, as well as its distance from the basi-scutal angle, and

the form of its basal extremity, all vary in some degree. The length

of the spur sometimes varies considerably, as in _B. concavus_ and

_amphitrite_. The parts of the mouth are only occasionally serviceable;

for the teeth on the labrum, and the state of the lower teeth on the

mandibles, and the presence of a step-formed projection at the lower

angle of the maxillæ, are all often variable. The relative lengths of

the two rami of the first pair of cirri, the degree of protuberance

of the segments, and the number of pairs of spines on the segments of

the posterior pairs of cirri, are sometimes useful; but the relative

lengths of the cirri, and more especially the numbers of pairs of

spines on the posterior cirri, are apt to vary. Finally, I must

express my deliberate opinion, that every part and organ, internal and

external, in Cirripedes, is liable to some amount of variation in some

of the species.

I must now point out the principal changes which supervene during

growth, and which cannot properly be called variations. In the first

place, I think, it is scarcely possible to recognise a species when

under the 1/10th of an inch in diameter. In some cases, as in _var.

d'Orbignii_ of _B. tintinnabulum_, the shell is invariably coloured

when old, but quite white when very young. Generally the tints become

very much darker with age. Some species, which usually or invariably

have, when mature, longitudinally folded walls, as _B. flosculus_

and _balanoides_, are perfectly smooth in youth. The walls in _B.

eburneus_, when young, have white, hyaline, longitudinal lines, and

are naked; whereas, with advancing age, these lines disappear, and the

subsequently formed shell becomes covered with membrane. The summits

of the radii are apt to be oblique in the young of _B. Capensis_,

_psittacus_, and _tintinnabulum_, whereas they are generally quite

square in old specimens. In _B. eburneus_, _cariosus_, and in a lesser

degree in _B. psittacus_, the scuta become longitudinally striated

only with age. On the other hand, in very young specimens of _B.

tintinnabulum_, the scuta sometimes are deeply impressed by little

pits placed in rows. I have already alluded to the longitudinal

furrow on the tergum so entirely changing its character, owing to the

edges becoming, during growth, folded inwards; this likewise causes a

decrease in the proportional breadth of the spur. In old specimens of

_B. flosculus, var. sordidus_, the whole tergum is much more elongated

than in young specimens. The basal margin of the sheath is hollow

beneath in the young of _B. cariosus_ and of some other species, but

in the old it is continuous with the inner surface of the walls. The

inner lamina of the parietes generally loses, to a certain extent, its

longitudinally ribbed character in old age. The basis is solid, instead

of being porose, in very young specimens of _B. improvisus_. In all the

species, the carino-lateral compartments, in early age, are very narrow

in proportion to the width of the lateral compartments; and in all, at

this early period, the operculum is large in proportion to the whole

shell. The number of spines on the edge of the maxillæ, the number of

segments in all the cirri, and the number of spines on each segment,

are few in early youth, and go on increasing with each successive

exuviation: the pedicels of the cirri are long in proportion to the

rami at this same early age.[84]

[84] In some specimens of _Balanus perforatus_ I made the following

enumeration of the number of segments in the cirri:--

+--------------+--------------+--------------+------------------+

| |Basal diameter|Basal diameter| Medium sized |

| | of shell | of shell | specimen about |

| | 1/20th of | 1/5th of |3/4ths of an inch |

| | an inch. | an inch. |in basal diameter.|

+--------------+--------------+--------------+------------------+

|First cirrus }| ? | 11 | 17 |

|shorter ramus}| | | |

| | | | |

|Second cirrus | 4 or 5 | 9 | 13 |

| | | | |

|Sixth cirrus | 9 or 10 | 19 |31, in another 36 |

+--------------+--------------+--------------+------------------+

In the specimen 1/5th of an inch in basal diameter, each segment

of the posterior cirri carried five pairs of spines; whereas,

in full-grown specimens, there are six or seven pairs. In the

1/20th of an inch specimen, on the inner maxillæ, there were

no spines between the upper large and the lower large pair of

spines; whereas, in the 1/5th of an inch specimen, there were five

intermediate spines, and in larger specimens nine or ten spines.

Notwithstanding the difficulties now enumerated, I hope that, owing to

having examined a vast number of specimens of the most varying species,

I have not fallen into very many errors. I have endeavoured to err

on the side of making too few instead of too many species. In those

cases, however, in which I have seen only a few specimens, I have been

sometimes compelled to decide without sufficient evidence.

I would gladly have divided this genus, already including 45 species,

into smaller genera; but so far from being enabled to do so, I

have been compelled to form my Sections (immediately to be given)

on characters not absolutely invariable, and far from obvious. I

was particularly anxious to separate the elongated species with a

boat-formed basis, which are attached to Gorgoniæ, and which form the

genus Conopea of Say, but I was unable to effect their separation even

as a sub-genus; for _B. navicula_ and _cymbiformis_ graduate in the

most insensible manner through _B. galeatus_ (the type of Say's genus)

and _B. calceolus_ into _B. stultus_, and this into _B. Ajax_; yet

this latter species has even been described as a mere variety of the

typical _B. tintinnabulum_! Indeed, so insensible is this graduation,

that the first and second sections of the genus are hardly distinct. I

fully admit, that if _B. stultus_ and _Ajax_ had never existed, _B.

calceolus_ and its three allies might have formed as natural a little

group, though difficult to be characterised, as does the sub-genus

Acasta; or perhaps this group and Acasta might have been combined

together. These same species, viz., _B. calceolus_ and its allies,

are intimately allied to _B. terebratus_ and _inclusus_, which are

contained in the last section (F) of the genus; and this shows that Dr.

Gray's proposed genus Chirona, including the species with non-porose

parietes in sections (E) and (F), could hardly have been instituted,

even if the porosity of the parietes had not been variable in _B.

unguiformis_, _balanoides_, and _glandula_. My fourth section (D),

founded on the basis not being porose, is perhaps the weakest of the

divisions, as may be seen in the list of exceptions appended to the

sectional headings.

The arrangement of the species is, I think, as natural as a linear

one could be made: every one knows how irregularly and in how many

directions the lines of affinity in every natural genus branch out.

Some few species stand rather isolated, as _B. declivis_; and _B.

allium_, _cepa_, and _quadrivittatus_ in a little group by themselves.

I have already shown how the species in the first and second sections

(A and B) blend into each other; and that the blending species are

likewise allied to some in the last section (F); furthermore, I shall

have occasion to show that these same species can hardly be separated

naturally from the sub-genus Acasta. The first section, moreover,

passes into the third (C) by _B. tulipiformis_; and the third into

the fourth (D) by _B. improvisus_, _nubilus_, _corrugatus_, and

_patellaris_: the fifth and sixth (E and F) sections are closely

connected together by _B. cariosus_ and _flosculus_; and these two

sections blend into the fourth (D) through _B. unguiformis_ and

_balanoides_, and lastly, into the third (C) section by _B. dolosus_

and _improvisus_.

The genus, as we have just seen, is hardly separated from the sub-genus

Acasta; by _B. allium_ it tends to pass through the sub-genus Creusia

into Pyrgoma; and by _B. imperator_ and _flosculus_ it graduates into

Elminius and Tetraclita.

_Geographical Distribution._--This, which is much the largest genus of

sessile cirripedes, has its species scattered over the whole world,

from the arctic regions, in lat. 74° 48′, where we have _B. crenatus_

and _porcatus_, throughout the tropical seas, to Cape Horn, where

_B. flosculus_ adheres to the coast-rocks. Many of the species have

individually very wide ranges; thus _B. tintinnabulum_ and _amphitrite_

are found throughout the warmer seas; but the wide distribution of

these species may be partly due to their frequent adhesion to ships'

bottoms: _B. crenatus_ ranges from the frozen seas, in lat. 74° 48′

north, to the West Indies and Cape of Good Hope--a wonderful endurance

of the most opposite climates. _Balanus improvisus_, again, extends

from Europe to Nova Scotia, thence southward to Patagonia, and up

the western coast of S. America, someway north of the Equator. Most

of the species have considerable ranges; thus of the six species

found on the eastern shores of northern America, five of them occur

in Great Britain. Of the thirty-six species of which the habitats

are known, exactly one third, or twelve, inhabit both the torrid and

temperate zones, these being divided by the isocryme of 68°; nine

are found exclusively in the torrid, and fifteen exclusively in the

temperate zones. Within the warmer latitudes, and especially in the

southern hemisphere, Tetraclita and Elminius to a certain extent

supplant Balanus. In depth, the species range from the upper limits

of the tidal zone to even fifty fathoms. _Balanus improvisus_ and

_eburneus_ are able to survive in brackish water. The different species

are attached to various surfaces--rocks, shells, timber, floating

objects, sea-weed, lamelliform corals, Milleporæ, Gorgoniæ, and even to

sponges. Mr. G. B. Sowerby has remarked[85] that in the species from

the southern hemisphere it is the basis, and in the species from the

northern hemisphere it is the parietes, which are elongated, when the

individuals, from being crowded together, become cylindrical; but this

is erroneous; _B. perforatus_, in the northern hemisphere, sometimes

has an elongated basis; but no doubt the basis of our commonest

species, as _B. balanoides_, _crenatus_, and _porcatus_, from being

either membranous or thin, does not become cup-shaped; whereas this

structure is conspicuous in _B. psittacus_ and _lævis_, the two

commonest species in southern South America.

[85] Darwin's 'Geology of S. America,' p, 264.

_Fossil Species._--Having already given, under the Family, some account

of the geological history of sessile cirripedes, short as it is, I here

only allude to the subject in order to state my conviction that species

cannot be satisfactorily distinguished in a fossil state, and rarely

in a recent state, without an examination of the opercular valves.

Nothing, indeed, could have been easier than to have affixed names

to many groups of specimens, having different aspects, but to feel

sure that these were really distinct species requires better evidence

than can be afforded by the shell, without the operculum. No doubt,

in some of the smaller sections of the genus--for instance, in that

characterised by a membranous basis--it would have been possible to

have distinguished some or several fossil species; but such have not as

yet been found. When the specimens are much fossilised, it is, indeed,

difficult to make out the primary points of structure--namely, whether

the parietes, radii, and basis are porose: to do this it is sometimes

necessary to rub down, polish, and carefully examine, a transverse

section of a piece of the shell.

_Sections of the Genus._

[A]

_Parietes, and basis, and radii permeated by pores._

[B]

_Parietes and basis sometimes permeated by pores, sometimes not; radii

not permeated by pores; shell elongated in its rostro-carinal axis;

basis boat-shaped, attached to Gorgoniæ and Milleporæ._

[C]

_Parietes and basis permeated by pores; radii not permeated by pores._

[D]

_Parietes permeated by pores. Basis and radii not permeated by pores._

[E]

_Basis membranous._

[F]

_Parietes and radii not permeated by pores. Basis sometimes permeated

by pores, sometimes not, sometimes excessively thin and hardly

distinguishable._[86]

[86] The following species might, owing to variation, or to the

obscurity of their structure, without care, be classed in the wrong

sections:--in A, _Balanus Ajax_, from living attached to Milleporæ,

is sometimes elongated in its rostro-carinal axis, and from having

its radii only finely porose, it might be classed in B: on the

other hand, _Bal. stultus_ is sometimes but little elongated, and

the basis hardly boat-formed, and hence might be classed in A. The

distinction between all the species in (B) and the sub-genus Acasta

is artificial.

In sections C and D, I have seen one specimen of _B. spongicola_

with a solid basis, and very young specimens of _B. improvisus_

are thus characterised, and therefore these species are liable to

be placed in the wrong section, D: _Bal. nubilus_, also, has part

of its base non-porose, and therefore likewise might be placed

in D: on the other hand, the circumference of the basis in _B.

patellaris_ is often porose, and hence this species, which belongs

to D, might be placed in C.

In _Bal. glandula_, in D, the parietes of the compartments, without

several were examined, might be thought to be solid, and therefore

this species might be wrongly placed in F; on the other hand, the

fossil _B. unguiformis_, in F, often has porose parietes, and such

specimens would naturally be placed in D. Lastly, without care, _B.

flosculus_ might be thought to have a membranous basis, and so get

placed in E.

The genus Pachylasma, without an examination of the animal's body,

might easily get misplaced in the wrong genus, amongst the species

in the last section (F) of Balanus, yet there can be no doubt that

Pachylasma belongs to the Chthamalinæ.

_Section_ A.

A Monograph on the Sub-class Cirripedia (Volume 2 of 2) The Balanidæ, (or Sessile Cirripedes); the Verrucidæ, etc., etc. · 第 46 / 417 题