MICHAEL W. NORTON, ESQ., Rhode Island.

HON. JOHN D. CRIMMINS, New York.

HON. JOSEPH GEOGHEGAN, Utah.

PATRICK F. MAGRATH, ESQ., New York.

HON. JOHN F. O’CONNELL, Rhode Island.

DR. M. F. SULLIVAN, Massachusetts.

BERNARD J. JOYCE, ESQ., Massachusetts.

PATRICK CARTER, ESQ., Rhode Island.

T. VINCENT BUTLER, ESQ., New York.

JOHN J. DALY, ESQ., New York.

GEN. D. F. COLLINS, New Jersey.

FRANCIS I. MCCANNA, ESQ., Rhode Island.

HON. ALEXANDER C. EUSTACE, New York.

HON. THOMAS J. LYNCH, Maine.

GEN. JOHN R. MCGINNESS, Virginia.

HON. THOMAS M. WALLER, Connecticut.

NOTES.

The entire proceedings of the Reception by President Roosevelt, Annual

Meeting and Eleventh Annual Dinner were stenographically reported by

Miss Viola Follis of Providence, R. I., and by her transcribed. Within a

few days afterwards, a copy of his speech was furnished each speaker, so

that it would come to the hands of the Editor of the _Journal_ exactly

as the speaker wished it finally to read.

The stenographic report and transcription were absolutely complete and

without error.

The floral decorations on the tables and walls were beautiful and

lavish, and at the termination of the dinner some of the nice pieces

were sent to the quarters of our lady guests, while the remainder were

sent to the hospitals.

During the evening music was furnished by a good orchestra. The words of

“Star Spangled Banner,” “Columbia, the Gem of the Ocean,” “Wearing of

the Green,” “Minstrel Boy,” and “Yankee Doodle” were printed on the

program, and the assemblage, accompanied by the musicians, sung these

songs with a will.

[Illustration:

HON. WILLIAM F. SHEEHAN.

Of New York City.

An Honored Member of the Society.

]

A large number of guests left Washington Sunday, January 17th, on the

Royal Blue Line 3 p. m. express for New York, and for their comfort

special cars were attached exclusively for their use. In the dining car

a special dinner was prepared and served under the supervision of

Conductor Lewis A. Herring, which was enjoyed by nearly all who returned

on that train, and he made the occasion enjoyable by pointing out

several interesting bits of scenery _en route_, among which was the

place where Washington crossed the Delaware. The menu was as follows:

Broiled Sardines on Toast

Blue Points on Half Shell

Ox Joint, Anglaise Consomme, Macedoine

Celery Olives

Baked Mackerel, Royal Sauce

Potatoes, Julienne

Lamb Chops, with Green Peas French Pancake, au Rum

Prime Roast Beef, au Jus

Mashed Potatoes Fried Parsnips

Roast Turkey, Cranberry Sauce

String Beans Spinach, with Egg

Claret Punch

Chicken Salad, au Mayonnaise

Tapioca Pudding, Custard Sauce

Vanilla Ice Cream Assorted Cake

Sugar Wafers

Roquefort and Edam Cheese

Toasted Water Crackers Saltine Wafers

Black Coffee

Benedictine

WASHINGTON, D. C., January 17, 1909.

A special meeting of the American Irish Historical Society was held in

Room 124, Hotel Raleigh, Washington, D. C., this day at 1.30 p. m.,

President-General Quinlan in the chair.

On motion of Mr. Donovan of New York, it was voted to revise the

constitution and by-laws of the Society, and the President-General was

instructed to appoint a committee of five to do this work, they to

report to the Executive Council.

On motion of Mr. T. Vincent Butler of New York, the thanks of the

Society were tendered to the President-General and the Secretary-General

for their efficient services in preparing for “the grandest meeting the

Society has ever held.” Mr. Butler, in support of his motion, made

interesting remarks concerning our fellow-member, President Roosevelt.

The President-General later announced that he had appointed the

following gentlemen members of the Committee to Revise the Constitution

and By-Laws: Messrs. Michael J. Jordan, Patrick J. McCarthy, Joseph T.

Ryan, John E. O’Brien and Thomas Z. Lee.

Short addresses were made by the President-General and several other

members on subjects connected with the welfare of the Society, after

which the meeting adjourned.

THOMAS ZANSLAUR LEE,

_Secretary-General_.

=Historical Notes and Papers.=

THE CIVIC VALUE OF MEMORIALS.

BY MISS MARY A. GREENE OF PROVIDENCE, R. I.

HONORARY STATE REGENT FOR RHODE ISLAND, NATIONAL SOCIETY DAUGHTERS OF

THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, GREAT-GREAT-GRANDDAUGHTER OF THOMAS HUGHES,

CAPTAIN IN THE WAR OF THE REVOLUTION AND MAJOR IN THE WAR OF 1812

AND AN ORIGINAL MEMBER OF THE RHODE ISLAND SOCIETY OF THE

CINCINNATI—A MAN OF IRISH PARENTAGE.

Who that visits Italy can fail to be inspired by the ruins of the Forum

and the palaces of the Cæsars on the Palatine? The Italian Government

has done wisely in making its work of excavation a work also of

restoration by replacing as far as possible the statues and monuments of

ancient time in their original positions, and in entrusting visitors to

the care of guides educated for their duties by a university course in

the history and archæology of the Eternal City. Such a guide, after a

whole day spent in enthusiastic descriptions of the temples, public

buildings, rostra and tombs of the Forum, was asked, “How happens it

that you are so very enthusiastic over all this, when it is your duty to

make this round day after day?” Never will the hearer forget his reply

as, drawing himself up to his full height, he exclaimed with the

proudest, loftiest accent, “_I am a Roman_.”

“The grandeur that was Rome” was the spirit of her citizens, their

expression in the life of their city, of their high ideals. When these

ideals failed to inspire, Rome fell.

That which makes a State is the character of its citizens. One of the

strongest influences in the moulding of character is the example of the

heroes of the past. Preservation of the history of those who helped to

make and mould the nation is, therefore, essential to the maintenance of

patriotism. Indeed, it is essential to the true moral development of the

nation,—to the very preservation of the nation.

One great advantage of the memorial tablet and the statue over the printed

page is that the former are seen and understood by all, while the pages

of history are only turned by those who have a certain degree of

education and interest. “What mean ye by these stones?” the children in

the land of Canaan would ask, gazing upon the heap of twelve smooth

stones by the banks of the Jordan. Then would the fathers in Israel

reply, “Because the waters of Jordan were cut off before the Ark of the

Covenant of the Lord, and these stones from the bed of the river are for

a memorial forever of Jehovah’s leadership of his people through the dry

bed of the river into the promised land.”

The historical and patriotic societies of the United States are doing a

much needed work by the erection of tablets and the marking of historic

spots. A want of reverence for those who founded our nation and fought

to establish it; a carelessness as to the lessons to be learned from the

early history of the country; a desecration of places consecrated by the

blood of our heroes, had much to do with making us, in appearance, a

flippant, boastful people, glorying only in the “bigness” of our country

and what our own generation was doing, in short, the boastful Yankee

caricatured by our European kinsmen.

That temper has changed. While the greater seriousness with which the

American people undertake their problems of government is no doubt in

part due to territorial expansion and greater international relations,

credit must also be given to the impressive influence of the memorials

placed in our State houses, our parks, along our streets, commemorating

the worthy deeds of our ancestors.

It is then a direct benefit to the State, and aid to good government, and

to the realization of the highest civic ideals, to place, where all can

see, memorials reciting the virtues and the heroic deeds of men like

Washington, Lincoln, Greene, Sullivan, Sherman and a host of others

whose splendid achievements, in war and in peace, are a part of our

heritage as American citizens, and are the inspiration of our youth to

give also of their best, in talents and in loyal, patriotic effort; to

make our country great in the best sense,—great in the character of its

citizens, great in the accomplishment of high ideals; great in the

enjoyment by all of the blessings of liberty.

Providence, R. I., February 12, 1909.

[Illustration:

MR. PATRICK CARTER.

Of Providence. R. I.

Member of the Executive Council.

]

CARTER DAY NURSERY. GIFT BY MR. PATRICK CARTER, MEMBER OF THE EXECUTIVE

COUNCIL, IN HONOR OF DECEASED SON.

CEREMONY TAKES PLACE AT HANDSOME BUILDING, CORNER PINE AND BYRON

STREETS, IN PRESENCE OF CLERGY, PROMINENT BUSINESS MEN AND

REPRESENTATIVES OF RELIGIOUS DENOMINATIONS.

BY THE SECRETARY-GENERAL.

In the presence of members of the clergy, prominent business men and

representatives of various religious denominations, the new Day Nursery,

erected at Pine and Byron streets as a memorial to Edward A. Carter, by

his parents, Mr. and Mrs. Patrick Carter, was formally transferred to

Bishop Matthew Harkins at 11 o’clock yesterday morning. Previous to this

ceremony there was a low Mass, at which Bishop Harkins was the

celebrant, Rev. Austin Dowling, also a member of the American Irish

Historical Society, acting as his assistant, at which time the building

was blessed.

A large audience assembled in the hall on the second floor to witness

the transfer of the keys, the deed and other documents to the Bishop. It

numbered men and women prominent in the business and social life of the

city, as well as others interested in charitable work.

After Bishop Harkins, wearing the purple robes of his office, had taken

a seat on the stage, with Fr. Dowling on his right and Rev. William Pyne

on his left, Mr. Carter made the following speech in presenting the

structure to the Bishop:

MR. CARTER’S ADDRESS.

“Bishop Harkins: In my own name and that of Mrs. Carter I have great

pleasure in handing over to you this morning, as the representative of

Nazareth home and the head of the diocese of Providence, the keys of the

Edward A. Carter Memorial, the receipted bills for its cost and a

paid-up five years’ policy of insurance on the building for $15,000.

“I am sure it is a happy moment for Mrs. Carter and for me; I may say,

the proudest moment of our lives, to be in a position to commemorate in

this way our son who gave such promise in his youth, and who was taken

from us so suddenly.

“A little more than a year ago we laid him away in St. Francis Cemetery

and with him the hopes that we had built upon, but the money which would

have been his to invest in business had he lived we have resolved to lay

aside for his memory in another kind of investment.

“This is our only stipulation—that it be administered prudently,

scientifically, but with mercy and in the spirit of Christian charity.

“We have no fear, Bishop, that the money which we have given to the

Nazareth Home will ever be diverted from the purpose for which we intend

it. We require no bonds from you, for your high standing makes the

ordinary safeguard of business in this case unnecessary. Into whatever

hands you entrust it, we feel certain that they will execute what we

plan.

“You, ladies of the Queen’s Daughters, honor us with your presence here

today. You have presided at the formation of this work; your ideas are

here incorporated and you have pledged yourselves to its support;

therefore, may I be the first to welcome you to its hospitality.

“Let me then, Bishop Harkins, in closing, hand over to you these

evidences that the building so happily completed is entirely

unencumbered; and let me assure you that while in doing so I now resign

the responsibility which has been my preoccupation and pleasure for

several months, still, while either Mrs. Carter or myself live, our

hearts are in this building, both for the name it bears and for the work

which we have confidence it will never fail to do in our community.”

RESPONSE OF BISHOP.

In response Bishop Harkins said in part: “Mr. and Mrs. Carter, I receive

very willingly and gratefully these evidences of your generosity. I

express to you my thanks and those of the entire community. There may

have been other cases in the United States like this, but this is the

first case that has come to my knowledge where a memorial of this kind

has been reared to an apparently lost, but not really lost, son.

“This is a very special, a very peculiar case. It shows not only a very

strong affection, but a very lively faith. It is that faith that is

necessary, a faith in the future, a realization that death does not end

all.

“Your son was a Cathedral boy, and when I say that I speak with a

considerable degree of pride. He was one of us and we knew him and loved

him. You determined that he should live on in a certain way and live

just about where he lived when he was here. So you have made your boy to

live; you have given him a kind of earthly immortality, if I may use

that term.

“He will live in the persons of the poor children who will be cared for

here. They will have the uplifting influence of the good sisters, the

Queen’s Daughters, the clergy, and all who can help them in any way. Yet

it will be he who will be living here.

“I thank you in my own name and in the name of the diocese of

Providence. I am sure that all those here present agree that no better

example can be given a community than that given here today. There is

gratitude in the hearts of all the citizens of Providence for this gift.

“In the name of the sisters who will have charge of this institution, I

wish to thank you. I welcomed them to our city here in Providence, for I

knew that I could not do greater service than to bring here the wise and

careful administration of charitable work they have always shown. They

will be mothers to the children. They will try to give, and will

well-nigh succeed in giving, all the maternal love that is given

children in the most favored homes. They will train them not only in

their duties to the church, but in every duty they must perform in civil

life.”

In conclusion Bishop Harkins paid a tribute to the Queen’s Daughters,

the organization which has assumed the maintenance of the institution.

DONORS ARE HONORED.

After the Bishop’s address, Miss Mary A. McArdle, President of the

Queen’s Daughters, made a brief address, in which she stated that Mr.

and Mrs. Carter had been elected honorary members of the Daughters of

the Queen of Heaven, concluding by presenting to Mrs. Carter a bouquet

of roses, in number the same as the years of life of the son in whose

memory the structure was given.

Mr. Carter responded briefly and the visitors then inspected the

building, many registering in the book provided for that purpose.

Among those present were: Mgr. Thomas F. Doran, Vicar General of the

diocese; Rev. Owen F. Clarke, Rev. Edward E. Seagrave, Rev. D. F.

Lowney, Rev. James C. Walsh, Rev. M. J. McCabe, Mayor P. J. McCarthy,

Mayor-elect Henry Fletcher, Attorney-General William B. Greenough,

Assistant Attorney-General Harry P. Cross, Cyrus P. Brown, Col. Cyrus M.

Van Slyck, Judge Frank E. Fitzsimmons, Judge Thomas Z. Lee, John E.

Canning and Thomas F. Monahan.

MODEL INSTITUTION.

This nursery, said to be one of the finest institutions of its kind in

the country, has been erected for the accommodation of poor children,

regardless of race, creed or color. The Queen’s Daughters, a body of

Catholic women with a membership of 700, which was organized in January

of the present year for the performance of charitable works, has assumed

its maintenance. The organization is affiliated with the Queen’s

Daughters of St. Louis, formed in 1889 by thirty-two women of that city

for charitable purposes.

The Sisters of the Holy Ghost, also known as the White Sisters, to whom

the institution was donated, first came to work among the sick poor in

this city in September, 1907. In their errands of mercy they found that

a day nursery was very much needed in the section in which their home is

located. The two day nurseries already established have been unable to

take care of all the children, both having long waiting lists, and the

building blessed yesterday will relieve the situation to a considerable

degree.

The building is admirably arranged, the purpose for which it will be

used having been taken into careful consideration by the architects,

Stone, Carpenter & Sheldon, and the ideas of the architects being

faithfully carried out by the builder, M. J. Houlihan.

[Illustration:

VICTOR HERBERT.

Of New York.

The Eminent Composer and High Authority on Music.

A New Member of the Society.

]

Mr. Carter’s intelligent liberality has rendered possible in Providence

a charity of peculiar value. The handsome building is a better monument

to his son’s memory than the most costly sarcophagus would be. It bids

fair for many years to come to minister to the needs of great numbers of

children of tender age whose parents cannot care for them during the

working hours of the day; and the community would have double reason to

congratulate itself if the example set by these donors were to inspire

other citizens of Providence to similar generous gifts. There are

twenty-three thousand women in this city who are employed in gainful

occupations, and many of them are married, with small children to

provide for. It is difficult to think of a more useful institution than

one that helps to lighten the domestic anxieties of these workers during

their enforced absence from home.

Mr. Carter is a member of the American Irish Historical Society and of

its Executive Council and served on the Reception Committee at the

events in Washington January 16, 1909.

WAR RECORD OF COLONEL JAMES QUINLAN.

ONE OF THE EARLIEST MEMBERS OF THE AMERICAN IRISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY.

BY FRANCIS J. QUINLAN, M. D., L. L. D., PRESIDENT-GENERAL.

In Volume VI of the Journal appeared a short sketch of Colonel Quinlan’s

life, in which his military record was incomplete and the date of birth

and receipt of certain commissions were incorrectly stated. The data

having been carefully collected and verified, a revised sketch is hereby

submitted:

James Quinlan was born in Tipperary, Ireland, September 13, 1833, and

came to New York in 1850 and there studied engineering. In 1853 he

joined the National Guard and became a member of the Sixty-Ninth

Regiment, being commissioned a Lieutenant in 1855, under Charles S. Roe,

and commissioned Captain in 1856.

On April 23, 1861, a few days after the fall of Fort Sumter, he left New

York with the Sixty-Ninth as Captain of Engineers. He was present at the

battle of Blackburn’s Ford, July 18th, and Bull Run July 21st, where he

was severely wounded. After this battle Acting Brigadier-General T. F.

Meagher recruited the celebrated Irish Brigade, and he was commissioned

Major of the Eighty-Eighth New York Infantry, one of the regiments of

that organization, in 1861, and ordered by General Meagher to proceed to

Fort Schuyler and take command there until further orders. (As far as we

know, he was the first volunteer officer to take command of a Fort in

the Civil War.) He was present in all the battles of that famous Brigade

in the Peninsular Campaign and commanded the regiment all through the

Seven Days’ fighting. He won his Medal of Honor by leading a charge on a

Confederate battery at Savage Station, Va., June 29, 1862. The battery

in question was one of six guns, and had been very annoying to the Union

troops. Several other regiments had made efforts to silence it, but

without avail. General W. W. Burns, U. S. A., who was in command on that

memorable day, wrote at the time Major Quinlan received his Medal of

Honor as follows: “The Medal of Honor won by your gallant charge which

silenced the enemy’s battery at Savage Station and closed that desperate

attack upon the rear of the Army of the Potomac, June 29, 1862, is a

just reward and memento for conspicuous bravery due from a grateful

Republic to the brave leader of the gallant Eighty-Eighth New York. No

one can feel more satisfaction for this signal proof of distinction and

glory than your old Commander of that day. The Eighty-Eighth saved the

lives of many gallant soldiers by that forlorn-hope charge, and cleared

our way to victory that day. It commemorated the charge of the Irish

Brigade at Fontenoy.” In the Circular “Medals of Honor” issued by the

War Department October 31, 1897, the ground of award of Major Quinlan’s

medal is as follows: “Led his regiment on the enemy’s battery, silenced

the guns, held the position against overwhelming numbers, and covered

the retreat of the Second Army Corps.” He was honorably mentioned by

General McClellan for bravery at Malvern Hill and Antietam. He was

commissioned Lieutenant-Colonel on September 22, 1862, and received his

honorable discharge for disability on medical certificate February 4,

1863.

After a few weeks’ illness of heart trouble he died at his home, 104

East 96th Street, August 29, 1906.

And so has passed into history the name of a citizen of foreign birth,

who owed allegiance to the whole of his adopted country, and when her

troubles came he was found early at the front, dedicating his all to her

perpetuity.

A firm, honest friend, a devoted Christian, a loyal brave soldier went

to his rest when James Quinlan joined the soldiers of our great Republic

who had gone before.

JOSEPH O’CONNOR, EDITOR, AUTHOR AND POET, WHO DECEASED AT ROCHESTER, N.

Y., OCTOBER 9TH, 1908.

SKETCH OF HIS LIFE. ONE OF HIS FAVORITE POEMS.

A great editor laid down forever a brilliant, beautiful and useful pen

when Joseph O’Connor, the Rochesterian, passed into Eternity from his

home in Rochester on the night of October 9, 1908.

In a few hours the news had flashed to all points of the compass,

bringing a pause and a hush of sadness to thousands of homes, from Maine

to California, wherein his unique personality was known and loved

through his nearly forty years of journalistic leadership.

Born in New York State of Irish parents in 1841, he was educated in the

best schools of his native State for the practice of the law, but he

early chose journalism instead of law for his life work and he made a

magnificent success of it.

He brought to the work a mind well-stocked with more of the true history

of the world than falls to the lot of most students of history. He

brought to his work a mind imbued with the true Christian philosophy of

the Catholic catechism. He had formed from youth up a habit of broad,

kindly outlook on things in general. He assumed and maintained a manly

attitude in politics, uncompromising in principle, but tolerant of other

men’s opinions. He had a born poet’s appreciation of true poetry, and a

literary judgment that came to be universally respected. He had a gift

of expression as a model of unique, finished, sincere writing. And his

humility was the best of it all.

He won his readers to his way of seeing things as much by the very

apparent unconsciousness of his own superiority as by his logical

presentation of his subject.

Through all his long life of varied editorship and many degrees of

political and literary success, there is no pessimism charged to his

account, no animosity, no bitterness; not even discourtesy.

Many a time in the heat of a political campaign he had to strike at a

champion of the other side, but his blow was always leonine. It was a

settler of the subject in dispute, but it left no ugly memories—no

galling personalities ever marred his political battles.

He scored his successes by the friendly hand shakes of his worsted

antagonists.

He prized his independence in politics, and never jeopardized it by

accepting favors or honors from friend or foe.

The journal of the American-Irish Historical Society, Vol. VIII, 1909 · 第 14 / 29 段