FLIGHT OF THE BUZZARD.

During my visit to the Southern States of America, I have had several

opportunities of watching, under favorable conditions, the flight of the

buzzard, the scavenger of Southern cities. Although in most respect this

bird's manner of flight resembles that of the various sea-birds which I

have often watched for hours sailing steadily after ocean steamships,

yet, being a land bird, the buzzard is more apt to give examples of that

kind of flight in which a bird remains long over the same place. Instead

of sailing steadily on upon outstretched pinions, the buzzard often

ascends in a series of spirals, or descends along a similar course. I

have not been able to time the continuance of the longest flights during

which the wings have not once been flapped, for the simple reason that,

in every case where I have attempted to do so, the bird has passed out

of view either by upward or horizontal traveling. But I am satisfied

that in many cases the bird sweeps onward or about on unflapping wings

for more than half an hour.

Now, many treat this problem of aerial flotation as if it were of the

nature of a miracle--something not to be explained. Explanations which

have been advanced have, it is true, been in many cases altogether

untenable. For instance, some have asserted that the albatross, the

condor, and other birds which float for a long time without moving

their wings--and that, too, in some cases, at great heights above the

sea-level, where the air is very thin--are supported by some gas within

the hollow parts of their bones, as the balloon is supported by the

hydrogen within it. The answer to this is that a balloon is _not_

supported by the hydrogen within it, but by the surrounding air, and in

just such degree as the air is displaced by the lighter gas. The air

around a bird is only displaced by the bird's volume, and the pressure

of the air corresponding to this displacement is not equivalent to more

than one five-hundredth part of the bird's weight. Another idea is that

when a bird seems to be floating on unmoving wings there is really a

rapid fluttering of the feathers of the wings, by which a sustaining

power is obtained. But no one who knows anything of the anatomy of

the bird will adopt this idea for an instant, and no one who has ever

watched with a good field-glass a floating bird of the albatross or

buzzard kind will suppose they are fluttering their feathers in this

way, even though he should be utterly ignorant of the anatomy of the

wings. Moreover, any one acquainted with the laws of dynamics will know

that there would be tremendous loss of power in the fluttering movement

imagined as compared with the effect of sweeping downward and backward

the whole of each wing.

There is only one possible way of explaining the floating power of

birds, and that is by associating it with the rapid motion acquired

originally by wing flapping, and afterward husbanded, so to speak, by

absolutely perfect adjustment and balancing. To this the answer is often

advanced that it implies ignorance of the laws of dynamics to suppose

that rapid advance can affect the rate of falling, as is implied by the

theory that it enables the bird to float.

Now, as a matter of fact, a slight slope of the wings would undoubtedly

produce a raising power, and so an answer is at one obtained to this

objection. But I venture to assert, with the utmost confidence, that a

perfectly horizontal plane, advancing swiftly in a horizontal direction

at first, will not sink as quickly, or anything like as quickly, as a

similar plane let fall from a position of rest. A cannon-ball, rushing

horizontally from the mouth of a cannon, begins to fall just as if it

were simply dropped. But the case of a horizontal plane is altogether

different. If rapidly advancing, it passes continually over still air;

if simply let fall, the air beneath it yields, and presently currents

are set up which facilitate the descent of the flat body; but there is

no time to set up these aerial movements as the flat body passes rapidly

over still air.

As a matter of fact, we know that this difference exists, from

the difference in the observed behavior of a flat card set flying

horizontally through the air and a similar card held horizontally and

then allowed to fall.

I believe the whole mystery of aerial flotation lies here, and that as

soon as aerial floating machines are planned on this system, it will be

found that the problem of aerial transit--though presenting still many

difficulties of detail--is, nevertheless, perfectly soluble.--_R.A.

Proctor, in Newcastle Weekly Chronicle_.

* * * * *

Scientific American Supplement, No. 497, July 11, 1885 · 第 36 / 46 题