STANZAS IN CHILDE HAROLD.

(Vol. iv., pp. 223. 285. 323.)

I trust that a few words more will not be deemed overmuch in pointing

out what I think will be found to be the source of T. W.'s difficulty.

We need not go to French or German translators, because it is reasonable

to suppose that where any sense can be made out of the text as it

stands, the last thing a foreigner would do would be to complete an

elliptical expression. I agree with MR. COLLINS, who says the expression

"is very good sense;" and from his adding "much more Byronic," I expect

he will agree with me in adding also, "but very bad taste." T. W. seems

to have felt this; and nothing can be more conclusive than his criticism

upon this point. I trust that there are few men of taste who have not as

utter an abhorrence of tyranny as Lord Byron; but I think that, strongly

as men of genius may be supposed to feel, few would have lugged in the

tyrants on such an occasion; as it seems to me it was just in the nature

of the noble poet, with or without cause, to do. What Byron says is

perfectly true; it is simply out of place: nevertheless, as the text

stands, it is said with force. But adopt T. W.'s variation, and can a

_flatter_ truism be conceived? And, after all, the objection not

removed; for the allusion would be equally out of place: unless, indeed,

your correspondent could make out of the text that

"Thy waters wasted them while they were free,"

And _wasted them_, _afterwards_, during their slavery,

Or, has continued _to waste them since_.

Notes and Queries, Vol. IV, Number 107, November 15, 1851 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 69 / 152 题