I.

1) Counsel for the Defendant Streicher accepted that position on 27

October 1945.

2) The Indictment against the said defendant and others was published on

18 October 1945 and served on the Defendant Streicher shortly

thereafter.

3) The said Counsel has therefore had a considerable time to familiarise

himself with the contents of the Indictment and especially these

which, as appears in the part of the Appendix A, page 33 relating to

the said defendant, are particularly relevant to him. In this

connection the Chief Prosecutor respectfully refers to Page 5,

Section IV(D)(3)(d) and page 26 Section X(A) and (B) of the

Indictment.

4) This Chief Prosecutor further respectfully reminds the Court that the

said Counsel has got a week from the filing of this answer until the

commencement of the Trial, and in addition any time which may be

occupied by the opening of the case and any matters preliminary to

evidence being produced requiring cross-examination by Counsel for

the Defendant Streicher.

5) If oral evidence is called relating to the part alleged to have been

played by the said defendant and the said Counsel is not ready to

cross-examine, he will be able to ask for a postponement of his

cross-examination.

6) It is therefore respectfully submitted that this Application is

premature, and that the time for applying for an adjournment to

assist Counsel for the said defendant is when a difficulty actually

arises at the Trial.

7) This Chief Prosecutor respectfully reminds the Tribunal of the words

of General Nikitchenko, then its President, uttered at Berlin on 18

October 1945: “It must be understood that the Tribunal which is

directed by the Charter to secure an expeditious hearing of the

issues raised by the charges will not permit any delay either in the

preparation of the defense or of the Trial.”

Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal, Nuremburg, 14 November 1945-1 October 1946, Volume 01 · 第 160 / 199 题