Mrs. Graves laughed, and said, "Yes, that is so."

Howard went on, "I have been thinking a great deal about our talk

yesterday, and it's a new light to me. I do not think I fully

understand, but I feel that there is something very big behind it all,

which I want to understand. This great force you speak of--is it an

AIM?"

"That's a good question," said Mrs. Graves. "No, it's not an aim at

all. It's too big for that; an aim is quite on a lower level. There's

no aim in the big things. A man doesn't fall ill with an aim--he

doesn't fall in love with an aim. It just comes upon him."

"But then," said Howard, "is it more than a sort of artistic gift which

some have and many have not? I have known a few real artists, and they

just did not care for anything else in the world. All the rest of life

was just a passing of time, a framework to their work. There was an

artist I knew, who was dying. The doctor asked him if he wanted

anything. 'Just a full day's work,' he said."

"Yes," said Mrs. Graves, "it is like that in a way; it is the one thing

worth doing and being. But it isn't a conscious using of minutes and

opportunities--it isn't a plan; it is just a fulness of life, rejoicing

to live, to see, to interpret, to understand. It doesn't matter what

life you live--it is how you live it. Life is only the cup for the

liquor which must else be spilled. I can only use an old phrase--it is

being 'in the spirit': when you ask whether it is a special gift, of

course some people have it more strongly and consciously than others.

But it is the thing to which we are all tending sooner or later; and

the mysterious thing about it is that so many people do not seem to

know they have it. Yet it is always just the becoming aware of what is

there."

"How do you account for that?" said Howard.

"Why," said Mrs. Graves, "to a great extent because religion is in such

an odd state. It is as if the people who knew or suspected the secret,

did all they could to conceal it--just as parents try to keep their

children ignorant of the ideas of sex. Religion has got so horribly

mixed up with other things, with respectability, social order,

conventions, doctrines, metaphysics, ceremony, music--it has become so

specialised in the hands of priests who have a great institution to

support, that dust is thrown in people's eyes--and just as they begin

to think they perceive the secret, they are surrounded by tiresome

dogmatists saying, 'It is this and that--it is this doctrine, that

tradition.' Well, that sort of religion IS a very special

accomplishment--ecclesiastical religion. I don't deny that it has

artistic qualities, but it is a poor narrow product; and then the

technically religious make such a fuss if they see the shoal of fish

escaping the net, and beat the water so vehemently that the fish think

it safer to stay where they are, and so you get sardines in tins!" said

Mrs. Graves with a smile--"by which I mean the churches."

"Yes," said Howard, "that is perfectly true! Christianity was at first

the most new, radical, original, anarchical force in the world--it was

the purest individualism; it was meant to over-ride all human

combinations by simply disregarding them; it was not a social reform,

and still less a political reform; it was a new spirit, and it was

meant to create a new kind of fellowship, the mere existence of which

would do away with the need for organisation; it broke meekly, like

water, through all human partitions, and I suppose it has been tamed."

"Yes," said Mrs. Graves, "it is not now the world against religion. It

is organised religion against real religion, because religion is above

and apart from all institutions. Christ said, 'When they persecute you

in one city, flee into another'; and the result of that is the Monroe

doctrine!"

"But are you not a Christian?" said Howard.

"I believe myself to be one," said Mrs. Graves; "and no doubt you will

say, 'Why do you live in wealth and comfort?' That's a difficulty,

because Christ meant us to be poor. But if one hands over one's money

to Christian institutions now, one is subsidising the forces of the

world--at least so I think. It's very difficult. Christ said that we

should bestow our goods upon the poor; but if I were to divide my goods

to-morrow among my neighbours, they would be only injured by it--it

would not be Christian of them to take them--they have enough. If they

have not, I give it them. It does less harm to me than to them. But

this I know is very irrational; and the point is not to be affected by

that. I could live in a cottage tomorrow, if there was need."

"Yes, I believe you could," said Howard.

"As long as one is not dependent upon money," said Mrs. Graves, "it

doesn't very much matter. The real point is to take the world as it

comes, and to be sure that one is on the side of what is true and

simple and sincere; but I do not pretend to have solved everything, and

I am hoping to learn more. I do learn more every day. One can't

interfere with the lives of people; poverty is not the worst evil. It

is nice to be clean, but I sometimes think that the only good I get

from money is cleanliness--and that is only a question of habit! The

real point is to be in life, to watch life, to love it, to live it; to

be in direct relations with everyone, not to be superior, not to be

KIND--that implies superiority. I just plod along, believing, fearing,

hoping, loving, glad to live while I may, not afraid to die when I

must. The only detachment worth having is the detachment from the idea

of making things one's own. I can't appropriate the sunset and the

spring, the loves and cares of others; it is all divided up, more

fairly than we think. I have had many sorrows and sufferings; but I am

more interested than ever in life, glad to help and be helped, ready to

change, desiring to change. It isn't a great way of living; but one

must not want that--and believe me, dear Howard, it is the only way."

Watersprings · 第 19 / 78 题