ST. JOHN CHRYSOSTOM.

IN the Benedictine edition of his works given by Dom Montfaucon, we have

in the first tome his two Exhortations to Theodorus; three books against

the Adversaries of a Monastic Life; the Comparison between a King and a

Monk; two books on Compunction; three books to Stagirius the monk, on

Tribulation and Providence; against those Clergymen who harbor Women

under their roof to serve them; another treatise to prove that

Deaconesses, or other Regular Women, ought not to live under the same

roof with men; On Virginity; To a Young Widow; On the Priesthood; and a

considerable number of scattered homilies. Theodorus, after renouncing

the advantages which high birth, a plentiful estate, a polite education,

and an uncommon stock of learning offered him in the world, and having

solemnly consecrated himself to God in a monastic state, violated his

sacred engagement, returned into the world, took upon him the

administration of his estate, fell in love with a beautiful young woman

named Hermione, and desired to marry her. St. Chrysostom, who had

formerly been his school-fellow, under Libanius, and been afterwards

instrumental in inducing him to forsake the world, and some time his

companion in a religious state, grievously lamented his unhappy fall;

and by two most tender and pathetic exhortations to repentance, gained

him again to God. Every word is dictated by the most ardent zeal and

charity, and powerfully insinuates itself into the heart by the charm of

an unparalleled sweetness, which gives to the strength of the most

persuasive eloquence an irresistible force. Nothing of the kind extant

is more beautiful, or more tender, than these two pieces, especially the

former. The saint, in the beginning, borrows the most moving parts of

the lamentations of Jeremy, showing that he had far more reason to

abandon himself to bitter grief than that prophet; for he mourned not

for a material temple and city with the holy ark and the tables of the

law, but for an immortal soul, far more precious than the whole material

world. And if one soul which observes the divine law is greater and

better than ten thousand which transgress it, what reason had he to

deplore the loss of one which had been sanctified, and the holy living

temple of God, and shone with the grace of the Holy Ghost: one in which

the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost had dwelt; but was stripped of its glory

and fence, robbed of its beauty, enslaved by the devil, and fettered

with his bolts and chains. Therefore the saint invites all creatures to

mourn with him, and declares he will receive no comfort, nor listen to

those who offer him any, crying out with the prophet: _Depart from me: I

will weep bitterly: offer not to comfort me_. Isa. xxii. 4. His grief,

he says, was just, because he wept for a soul that was fallen from

heaven to hell, from grace into sin: it was reasonable, because by tears

she might yet be recovered; and he protests that he would never

interrupt them, till he should learn that she was risen again. To

fortify his unhappy friend against the temptation of despair, he shows

by the promises, examples, and parables of the Old and New Testaments,

that no one can doubt of the power or goodness of God, who is most ready

to pardon every sinner that sues for mercy. Observing that hell was not

created for man, but heaven, he conjures him not to defeat the design of

God in his creation, and destroy the work of his mercy by persevering in

sin. The difficulties which seemed to stand in his way, and dispirited

him, the saint shows would be all removed, and would even vanish of

themselves, if he undertook the work with courage and resolution: this

makes the conversion of a soul easy. He terrifies him by moving

reflections on death, and the divine judgments, by a dreadful

portraiture which he draws of the fire of hell, which resembles not our

fire, but burns souls, and is eternal; lastly, by the loss of heaven, on

the joys of which kingdom he speaks at large; on its immortality, the

company of the angels, the joy, liberty, beauty, and glory of the

blessed, adding, that such is this felicity, that in its loss consists

the most dreadful of all the torments of the damned. Penance averts

these evils, and restores to a soul all the titles and advantages which

she had forfeited by her fall: and its main difficulty and labor are

vanquished by a firm resolution, and serious beginning of the work. This

weakens and throws down the enemy: if he be thoroughly vanquished in

that part where he was the strongest, the soul will pursue, with ease

and cheerfulness, the delightful and beautiful course of virtue upon

which she has entered. He conjures Theodorus, by all that is dear, to

have compassion on himself; also to have pity on his mourning friends,

and not by grief send them to their graves: he exhorts him resolutely to

break his bonds at once, not to temporize only with his enemy, or

pretend to rise by degrees; and he entreats him to exert his whole

strength in laboring to {253} be of the happy number of those who, from

being the last, are raised by their fervor to the first rank in the

kingdom of God. To encourage him by examples, he mentions a young

nobleman of Phoenicia, the son of one Urbanus, who, having embraced with

fervor the monastic state, insensibly fell into lukewarmness, and at

length returned into the world, where he enjoyed large possessions,

lived in pomp, and abandoned himself to the pursuit of vanity and

pleasures; till, opening his eyes upon the remonstrances of certain

pious friends, he distributed his whole estate among the poor, and spent

the rest of his life in the desert with extraordinary fervor. Another

ascetic, falling by degrees, in an advanced age, committed the crime of

fornication; but immediately rising, attained to an eminent degree of

sanctity, and was honored with the gift of miracles. The disciple of St.

John, who had been a captain of a troop of robbers and murderers, became

an illustrious penitent. In like manner, our saint exhorts and conjures

this sinner to rise without delay, before he was overtaken by the divine

judgments, and to confess his sins with compunction of heart, abundant

bitter tears, and a perfect change of life, laboring to efface his

crimes by good works, to the least of which Christ has promised a

reward.

St. Chrysostom begins his second Exhortation to Theodorus, which is much

shorter than the first, by expressing his grief as follows: (t. 1, p.

35:) "If tears and groans could have been conveyed by letters, this

would have been filled. I grieve not that you have taken upon you the

administration of your affairs; but that you have trampled under your

feet the sacred engagement you had made of yourself to Christ. For this

I suffer excessive trouble and pain; for this I mourn; for this I am

seized with fear and trembling, having before my eyes the severe

damnation which so treacherous and base a perfidiousness deserves." He

tells him yet "that the case is not desperate for a person to have been

wounded, but for him to neglect the cure of his wounds. A merchant after

shipwreck labors to repair his losses; many wrestlers, after a fall,

have risen and fought so courageously as to have been crowned; and

soldiers, after a defeat, have rallied and conquered. You allege," says

he, "that marriage is lawful. This I readily acknowledge; but it is not

now in your power to embrace that state: for it is certain that one who,

by a solemn engagement, has given himself to God as his heavenly spouse,

if he violates this contract, he commits an adultery, though he should a

thousand times call it marriage. Nay, he is guilty of a crime so much

the more enormous as the majesty of God surpasses man. Had you been

free, no one would charge you with desertion; but since you are

contracted to so great a king, you are not at your own disposal." St.

Chrysostom pathetically shows him the danger, baseness, and crime of

deferring his repentance, sets before him hell, the emptiness of the

world, the uneasiness and troubles which usually attend a married life,

and the sweetness of the yoke of Christ. He closes this pressing

exhortation by mentioning the tears and prayers of his friends, which

they would never interrupt, till they had the comfort of seeing him

raised from his fall. St. Chrysostom wrote these two exhortations about

the year 369, which was the second that he spent in his mother's house

at Antioch when he led there an ascetic life. The fruit of his zeal and

charity was the conversion of Theodorus, who broke his engagements with

the world, and returned to his solitude. In 381 he was made bishop of

Mopsuestia. In opposing the Apollinarist heresy, he had the misfortune

to lay the seeds of Nestorianism in a book which he composed on the

Incarnation, and other writings. He became a declared protector of

Julian the Pelagian, when he took refuge in the East; wrote an express

treatise against original sin; and maintained the Pelagian errors in a

multitude of other works, which were all condemned after his death,

though only fragments of them have reached us, preserved chiefly in

Facundus, Photius, and several councils. He died in 428, before the

solemn condemnation of his errors, and in the communion of the Catholic

church. See Tillemont, t. 12.

During St. Chrysostom's retreat in the mountains, two devout servants of

God desired of him certain instructions on the means of attaining to the

virtue of compunction. Demetrius, the first of these, though he was

arrived at a high degree of perfection in an ascetic life, always ranked

himself among those who crawl on the earth, and said often to St.

Chrysostom, kissing his hand, and watering it with tears, "Assist me to

soften the hardness of my heart." St. Chrysostom addressed to him his

first book on Compunction, in which he tells him that he was not

unacquainted with this grace, of which he had a pledge in the

earnestness of his desire to obtain it, his love of retirement, his

watching whole nights, and his abundant tears, even those with which,

squeezing him by the hand, he lead begged the succor of his advice and

prayers, in order to soften his dry, stony heart into compunction. With

the utmost confusion for his own want of this virtue, he yielded to his

request, begging in return his earnest prayers for the conversion of his

own soul. Treating first on the necessities and motives of compunction,

he takes notice that Christ pronounces those blessed who mourn, and says

we ought never to cease weeping for our own sins, and those of the whole

world, which deserves and calls for our tears so much the more loudly,

as it is insensible of its own miseries. We should never cease weeping,

if we considered how much sin reigns among men. The saint considers the

sin of rash judgment as a general vice among men, from which he thinks

scarce any one will be found to have lived always free. He {254} says

the same of anger; then of detraction; and considering how universally

these crimes prevail among men, cries out: "What hopes of salvation

remain for the generality of mankind, who commit, without reflection,

some or other of these crimes, one of which is enough to damn a soul?"

He mentions also, as general sins, swearing, evil words, vain-glory, not

giving alms, want of confidence in divine providence, and of resignation

to his will, covetousness, and sloth in the practice of virtue. He

complains that whereas the narrow path only leads to heaven, almost all

men throw themselves into the broad way, walking with the multitude in

their employs and actions, seeking their pleasure, interest, or

convenience, not what is safest for their souls. Here what motives for

our tears! A life of mortification and penance he prescribes, as an

essential condition for maintaining a spirit of compunction; saying that

water and fire are not more contrary to each other, than a life of

softness and delights is to compunction; pleasure being the mother of

dissolute laughter and madness. A love of pleasure renders the soul

heavy and altogether earthly; but compunction gives her wings, by which

she raises herself above all created things. We see worldly men mourn

for the loss of friends and other temporal calamities. And are not we

excited to weep for our spiritual miseries? We can never cease if we

have always before our eyes our sins, our distance from heaven, the

pains of hell, God's judgments, and our danger of losing Him, which is

the most dreadful of all the torments of the damned.

In his second book On Compunction, which is addressed to Stelechius, he

expresses his surprise that he should desire instructions on compunction

of one so cold in the divine service as he was; but only one whose

breast is inflamed with divine love, and whose words are more

penetrating than fire, can speak of that virtue. He says that

compunction requires in the first place, solitude, not so much that of

the desert, as that which is interior, or of the mind. For seeing that a

multitude of objects disturbs the sight, the soul must restrain all the

senses, remain serene, and without tumult or noise within herself,

always intent on God, employed in his love, deaf to corporeal objects.

As men placed on a high mountain hear nothing of the noise of a city

situated below them, only a confused stir which they no way heed; so a

Christian soul, raised on the mountain of true wisdom, regards not the

hurry of the world; and though she is not destitute of senses, is not

molested by them, and applies herself and her whole attention to

heavenly things. Thus St. Paul was crucified and insensible to the

world, raised as far above its objects as living men differ from

carcasses. Not only St. Paul, amid a multiplicity of affairs, but also

David, living in the noise of a great city and court, enjoyed solitude

of mind, and the grace of perfect compunction, and poured forth tears

night and day, proceeding from an ardent love and desire of God and his

heavenly kingdom, the consideration of the divine judgments, and the

remembrance of his own sins. Persons that are lukewarm and slothful,

think of what they do or have done in penance to cancel their debts; but

David nourished perpetually in his breast a spirit of compunction, by

never thinking on the penance he had already done, but only on his debts

and miseries, and on what he had to do in order to blot out or deliver

himself from them. St. Chrysostom begs his friend's prayers that he

might be stirred up by the divine grace to weep perpetually under the

load of his spiritual evils, so as to escape everlasting torments.

The saint's three books, On Providence, are an exhortation to comfort,

patience, and resignation, addressed to Stagirius, a monk possessed by

an evil spirit. This Stagirius was a young nobleman, who had exasperated

his father by embracing a monastic state: but some time after fell into

lukewarmness, and was cruelly possessed by an evil spirit, and seized

with a dreadful melancholy, from which those who had received a power of

commanding evil spirits were not able to deliver him. St. Chrysostom

wrote these books soon after he was ordained deacon in 380. In the

first, he shows that all things are governed by divine providence, by

which even afflictions are always sent and directed for the good of the

elect. For any one to doubt of this is to turn infidel: and if we

believe it, what can we fear whatever tribulations befall us, and to

whatever height their waves ascend? Though the conduct of divine

providence, with regard to the just, be not uniform, it sends to none

any tribulations which are not for their good; when they are most heavy,

they are designed by God to prepare men for the greatest crowns.

Moreover, God is absolute master to dispose of us, as a potter of his

clay. What then have we to say? or how dare we presume to penetrate into

his holy counsels? The promise of God can never fail: this gives us an

absolute security of the highest advantages, mercy, and eternal glory,

which are designed us in our afflictions. St. Chrysostom represents to

Stagirius that his trials had cured his former vanity, anger, and sloth,

and it was owing to them that he now spent nights and days in fasting,

prayer, and reading. In the second book, he presses Stagirius

strenuously to reject all melancholy and gloomy thoughts, and not to be

uneasy either about his cure, or the grief his situation was likely to

give his father, but leaving the issue to God, with perfect resignation

to ask of him this mercy, resting in the entire confidence that whatever

God ordained would turn to his greatest advantage. In the third book, he

mentions to Stagirius several of his acquaintance, whose sufferings,

both in mind and body, were more grievous than those with which he was

afflicted. He bids him also pay a visit to the hospitals and prisons;

for he would there see that his cross was light in comparison of what

many others endured. {255} He tells him that sin ought to be to him the

only subject of grief; and that he ought to rejoice in sufferings as the

means by which his sins were to be expiated. A firm confidence in God, a

constant attention to his presence, and perpetual prayer, he calls the

strong ramparts against sadness.

When the Arian emperor Valens, in 375, commanded the monks to be turned

out of their deserts, and enrolled in the troops, and several Catholics

reviled them as bigots and madmen, St. Chrysostom took up his pen to

justify them, by three books, entitled, Against the Impugners of a

Monastic State. T. 1, p. 44, he expresses his surprise that any

Christians could speak ill of a state which consists in the most perfect

means of attaining to true virtue, and says they hurt themselves, not

the monks, whose merit they increase; as Nero's persecution of St. Paul,

because he had converted one of the tyrant's concubines, enhanced the

apostle's glory. A more dreadful judgment is reserved to these enemies

of the love of Christ. They said, they drew no one from his faith. The

saint retorts: What will faith avail without innocence and virtue? They

alleged that a Christian may be saved without retiring into the desert.

He answers: Would to God men lived so in the world that monasteries were

of no advantage! but seeing all disorders prevail in it, who can blame

those who seek to shelter themselves from the storm? He elegantly shows

that the number of those that are saved in the world is exceeding small,

and that the gate of life is narrow. The multitude perished in Noah's

flood, and only eight escaped in the ark. How foolish would it have been

to rely carelessly on safety in such danger! Yet here the case is far

more dreadful, everlasting fire being the portion of those that are

lost. Yet in the world how few resist the torrent, and are not carried

down with the crowd, sliding into anger, detraction, rash judgment,

covetousness, or some other sin. Almost all, as if it were by common

conspiracy, throw themselves into the gulf, where the multitude of

companions will be no comfort. Is it not, then, a part of wisdom to fly

from these dangers, in order to secure our only affair in the best

manner possible?

Whereas parents sometimes opposed the vocation of their children to a

monastic state, in his second book he addresses himself to a Pagan

father, who grieved to see his son and heir engaged in that profession.

He tells him he has the greatest reason to rejoice; proving from

Socrates, and other heathen philosophers, that his son is more happy in

voluntary poverty and contempt of the world, than he could have been in

the possession of empires: that he is richer than his father, whom the

loss of one bag of his treasures would afflict, whereas the monk, who

possessed only a single cloak, could see without concern even that

stolen, and would even rejoice though condemned to banishment or death.

He is greater than emperors, more happy than the world, out of the reach

of its malice or evil, whom no one could hurt if he desired it. A father

who loves his son ought more to rejoice at his so great happiness than

if he had seen him a thousand times king of the whole earth, and his

life and kingdom secured to him for ten thousand years. What treasures

would not have been well employed to purchase for him such a soul as his

was rendered by virtue, could this blessing have been procured for

money? He displays the falsehood of worldly pleasure; the inconstancy,

anxiety, trouble, grief, and bitterness of all its enjoyments, and says

that no king can give so sensible a joy as the very sight of a virtuous

man inspires. As he speaks to a Pagan, he makes a comparison between

Plato and Dionysius the tyrant; then mentions an acquaintance of his

own. This was a holy monk, whom his Pagan father, who was a rich

nobleman, incensed at his choice of that state, disinherited; but was at

length so overcome by the virtue of this son, that he preferred him to

all his other children, who were accomplished noblemen in the world,

often saying that none of them was worthy to be his slave; and he

honored and respected him as if he had been his own father. In the third

book, St. Chrysostom directs his discourse to a Christian father, whom

he threatens with the judgment of Hell, if he withdrew his children from

this state of perfection, in which they would have become suns in

heaven, whereas, if they were saved in the world, their glory would

probably be only that of stars. He inveighs against parents, who, by

their discourse and example, instil into their children a spirit of

vanity, and sow in their tender minds the seeds of covetousness, and all

those sins which overrun the world. He compares monks to angels, in

their uninterrupted joy and attention to God; and observes that men in

the world are bound to observe the same divine law with the monks, but

cannot so easily acquit themselves of this obligation, as he that is

hampered with cords cannot run so well as he that is loose and at

liberty. He exhorts parents to breed up their children for some years in

monasteries, and to omit nothing in forming them to perfect virtue. In

his elegant short treatise, entitled A Comparison between a King and a

Monk, t. 1, p. 116, he beautifully shows that a pious monk is

incomparably more honorable, more glorious, and more happy than the

greatest monarch, by enjoying the favor of heaven, and possessing God;

by the empire over himself and his own passions, by which he is king in

his own breast, exercising the most glorious command; by the sweetness

and riches of divine grace; by the kingdom of God established in his

soul; by prayer, by which all things are in his power; by his universal

benevolence and beneficence to others, procuring to every one all

spiritual advantages as far as lies in him; by the comfort which he

finds in death which is terrible {256} to kings, but by which he is

translated to an immortal crown, &c. This book is much esteemed by

Montfaucon and the devout Blosius.

St. Chrysostom, in his treatise on Virginity, t. 1, p. 268, says this

virtue is a privilege peculiar to the true church, not to be found, at

least pure, among heretics: he proves against the Manichees, that

marriage is good: yet says that virginity as far excels it as angels

men, but that all its excellency is derived from the consecration of a

soul to God, and her attention to please him, without which this state

avails nothing.

After he was ordained deacon at Antioch, he composed his book To a Young

Widow, (t. 1, p. 337,) a lady who had lost her husband Tarasius,

candidate for the prefectship of the city. He draws motives to comfort

her from the spiritual advantages of holy widowhood, and the happiness

to which her husband was called. His second book To the Widow, (t. 1, p.

349,) is a dissuasive from second marriages, when they are contracted

upon worldly motives.

His six incomparable books on the Priesthood, he composed to excuse

himself to his friend Basil, who complained that he had been betrayed by

him into the episcopal charge; for Chrysostom persuaded him they had

time yet to conceal themselves; yet secretly absconded himself and left

the other to be chosen. Basil, when he met him afterwards, was not able

to speak for some time but by a flood of tears; and at length broke

through them only to give vent to his grief in bitter complaints against

the treachery of his friend. This work is wrote in a dialogue between

the two friends. St. Chrysostom, in the first book, alleges (t. 1, p.

362) that he could not deprive the church of a pastor so well qualified

to serve it as Basil was; nor undertake himself a charge for which he

had not the essential talents, and in which he should involve others and

himself in ruin. In the second book he justifies his own action in not

hindering the promotion of his friend to the episcopacy, by observing

that to undertake the charge of souls is the greatest proof we can give

of our love for Christ, which He declared by putting the question thrice

to St. Peter whether he loved him, before he committed to him the care

of his flock. John xxi. 15. If we think it an argument of our love for a

friend to take care of his servants or cattle, much more will God

recompense faithful pastors, who feed those dear souls to save which God

died. The pastoral charge is certainly the first of all others in merit

and dignity. The saint therefore thinks he should have prevaricated if

he had deprived the church of a minister capable of serving it. But in

order to justify his own flight, he adds that the dangers and

difficulties of this state are proportioned to its pre-eminence and

advantages. For what can be more difficult and dangerous than the charge

of immortal souls, and of applying to them remedies, which, to take

effect, depend upon their own co-operation and consent, and must be

always proportioned to their dispositions and character, which must be

sounded, as well as to their wounds? Remissness leaves a wound half

cured: and a suitable penance often exasperates and makes it wider.

Herein the greatest sagacity and prudence are necessary: Nor is the

difficulty less in bringing back to the church members which are

separated from it. Basil replied to this discourse of St. Chrysostom:

"You then love not Christ, who fly from the charge of souls." St.

Chrysostom answered, that he loved him, and fled from this charge

because he loved him, fearing to offend him by taking upon him such an

office, for which he was every way unqualified. Basil retorts with

warmth, that his treachery towards himself was unpardonable, because he

was acquainted with his friend's incapacity. Chrysostom answers, that he

should never have betrayed him into that dignity, if he had not known

his charity and other qualifications. In order to show that he had

reason to shun that charge, he in his third book sets forth the

excellence and obligations of that dignity; for it is not earthly, but

altogether heavenly, and its ministry would do honor to the angels; and

a pastor ought to look upon himself as placed among the heavenly

spirits, and under an obligation of being no less pure and holy. This he

shows, first, from the tremendous sacrifice of the altar, which requires

in the offerer a purity truly becoming heaven, and even far surpassing

the sanctity which was required in so terrible a manner of priests in

the Old Law, a mere shadow of ours. "For," says he, "when you behold the

Lord himself lying the victim on the altar, and offered, and the priest

attending, and praying over the sacrifice, purpled with his precious

blood, do you seem to remain among men and on earth, or not rather to be

translated into heaven? O wonderful prodigy! O excess of the divine

mercy! He who is seated above at the right hand of the Father, is in

that hour held by all in their hands, and gives himself to be touched

and received. Figure to yourself Elias before the altar, praying alone,

the multitude standing around him in silence, and trembling, and the

fire falling from heaven and consuming the sacrifice. What is now done

is far more extraordinary, more awful, and more astonishing. The priest

is here standing, and calls down from heaven, not fire, but the Holy

Ghost: he prays a long time, not that a flame may be kindled, but that

grace may touch the sacrifice, and that the hearts of all who partake of

it may be purged by the same." c. 5, p. 385. (See the learned prelate

Giacomelli's Note on St. Chrysostom's doctrine on the real presence of

the body of Christ in the Eucharist, and on the sacrifice of the altar,

in hunc librum, c. 4, p. 340.) Secondly, he mentions the eminent

prerogative of binding and loosing, not bodies, but souls, with which

the priesthood of the New Law is {257} honored: a power reaching the

heavens, where God confirms the sentence pronounced by priests below: a

power never given to angels, yet granted to men. John xx. 22. All power

was given by the Father to the Son, who again transferred it on men. It

is esteemed a great authority if an emperor confers on a private person

power to imprison others or to set them at liberty. How great then is

the authority with which God honors the priesthood. The priests of the

Old Law declared lepers healed; those of the New really cleanse and heal

our souls. They are our spiritual parents, by whom we are reborn to

eternal life; they regenerate us by baptism, again remit our sins by

extreme unction, (James v. 14,) and by their prayers appease God whom we

have offended. From all which he infers that it is arrogance and

presumption to seek such a dignity, which made St. Paul himself tremble

(1 Cor. xi. 3, &c.) If the people in a mad phrensy should make an

ignorant cobble general of their army, every one would commend such a

wretch if he fled and hid himself that he might not be instrumental in

his own and his country's ruin. "If any one," says he, "should appoint

me pilot, and order me to steer a large vessel in the dangerous Egaen or

Tyrrhenian sea, I should be alarmed and struck with fear, and rather fly

than drown both myself and crew." The saint proceeds to mention the

principal temptations to which a pastor of souls is himself exposed, and

the storms by which he is assailed; as vain-glory, for instance, a more

dreadful monster than the sirens of the poets, which passengers, by

standing on their guard, could sail by and escape. "This rock," says he,

"is so troublesome to me even now, when no necessity drives me upon it,

that I do not quite escape being hurt by it. But if any one had placed

me on so high a pinnacle, it would have been as if, having tied my hands

behind my back, he had exposed me to wild beasts to be torn in pieces."

He adds the danger of human respect, fear of the great ones, contempt or

neglect of the poor; observing that none can encounter such dangers, but

such as are perfect in virtue, disinterested, watchful over themselves,

inured to mortification by great abstinence, resting on hard beds, and

assiduous labor: lastly, what is most rare, dead to themselves by

meekness, sweetness, and charity, which no injuries or reproaches, no

ingratitude, no perverseness, or malice, can ever weary or overcome: for

a perfect victory over anger is a most essential part of the character

of a good pastor, without which all his virtues will be tarnished, and

he will reap no fruit of his labors. He makes this dreadful remark, that

within the circle of his own acquaintance he had known many who in

solitude led lives pleasing to God, but being advanced to the

priesthood, lost both themselves and others. If no Christian can call to

mind, without trembling, the dreadful account which he is to give at the

tribunal of Christ for his own sins, how must he tremble at this

thought, who sees himself charged with the sins and souls of others?

Heb. xiii. 17. In the fourth book he proves that one unfit for the

pastoral charge is not excused because it is imposed on him by others,

as one unacquainted with the rules of architecture can by no means

undertake to build, nor one to practise medicine who is a stranger to

that profession. He speaks of the crime of those who choose unworthy

pastors, and of the learning necessary for this charge, especially in

applying suitable remedies to every spiritual disorder, in confuting

Pagans, Jews, and heretics, and in instructing the faithful. A talent

for preaching is an indispensable qualification. In the fifth book he

prescribes the manner in which a preacher ought to announce the word of

God, with what indefatigable pains, and with what purity of intention,

desiring only to please God and plant his love in all hearts, and

despising the applause of men, insensible both to their praise and

censures. His discourse must be set off by piety, natural eloquence,

plain simplicity, and dignity, that all may hear the divine word

willingly, and with respect and pleasure, so as to wish at the end of

the sermon that it were longer. The extreme danger of vain-glory so much

alarmed him, that in the close of this book he again speaks against that

vice, and says, that he who entirely subdued this furious wild beast,

and cut off its numberless heads, enjoys a great interior calm, with

infinite spiritual advantages; and that every one is bound to stand

always armed against its assaults. In the sixth book, he shows that

priests will be punished for the sins of others. It is no excuse for a

watchman to say, _I heard not the trumpet: I saw not the enemy

approach_, (Ezech. xxxiii. 3,) for he is appointed sentinel to watch and

announce the danger to others. If a single soul perishes through his

neglect, this will condemn him at the last day. In how great

watchfulness must he live not to be infected with the contagion of the

world, with which he is obliged to converse! With what zeal, vigilance,

and fervor is he bound to acquit himself of all his duties and

functions! For priests are ambassadors of heaven, sent not to one city,

but to the whole earth, with a strict charge never to cease scattering

the divine seed, preaching and exhorting with so great diligence, that

no secret sinner may be able to escape them. They are moreover appointed

by God mediators to intercede with him for the sins both of the living

and the dead; to offer the tremendous sacrifice, and hold the common

Lord of all things in their hands. With what purity, with what sanctity

ought he to be adorned, who exercises so sublime a function? In it

angels attend the priest, all the choir of heaven joins, and the holy

place near the altar is occupied by legions of blessed spirits, in honor

of Him who is laid upon it. This he confirms by a vision of a holy old

man, who saw a multitude of bright spirits surrounding the altar,

profoundly bowing their heads. "Another," says the {258} saint, "assured

me, that he had both seen himself, and heard from others, that the souls

of those who receive the holy mysteries before death, depart out of

their bodies attended by angels as troops of heavenly guards." Lastly,

he shows that sins are more easily committed, and are more grievous, in

the episcopal ministry than in holy retirement. Basil, at this

discourse, almost swooned away in the excess of grief and fear with

which he was seized, till after some time, recovering himself, he said

in the bitterness of his heart, What has the church of God committed to

have deserved so dreadful a calamity, that the pastoral charge should be

intrusted to the most unworthy of men? For he had before his eyes on one

side the glory, the sanctity, the spiritual beauty and wisdom of the

sacred spouse of Christ; and on the other, the sins and miseries of his

own soul; and this consideration drew from him a flood of tears.

Chrysostom said, that as to himself, upon the first news of his danger

he had swooned away, and only returned to himself to vent his grief by

abundance of tears; in which agony he passed all that time. He adds: "I

will now discover to you the deplorable state of my mind at that time,

that out of mere compassion you may forgive me what I have done; and I

wish I could show you my wretched heart itself.--But all my alarms are

now converted into joy." Basil replied: "But I am now plunged in bitter

sorrow and tears: and what protection can I seek? If you have still any

bowels of tenderness and compassion for my soul, any consolation in

Christ, I conjure you never to forsake me in the dangers in which you

have engaged me." St. Chrysostom answered, smiling, "In what can I serve

you in your exalted station? However, when a respite from your functions

affords you any leisure, I will wait upon you, and will never be wanting

in any thing in my power." Basil at this arose weeping. St. John,

embracing him and kissing his head, said, "Be of good courage, trusting

in Christ, who has called you to his holy ministry."

In the first tome of his works, p. 228, we have a book which he composed

when he was first made bishop of Constantinople, in 397, Against those

who have sub-introduced Women; that is, against such of the clergy as

kept deaconesses, or spiritual sisters, under the same roof to take care

of their household. Saint Chrysostom condemns this custom as criminal in

itself, both because dangerous, and because scandalous to others.

Whatever pretext such persons allege of imaginary necessities, and of

their security and precautions against the danger, he shows that there

is always danger of their finding a lurking pleasure in such company.

Though they perceive not any secret passion, he will not believe them

exempt; for men are often the greatest strangers to their own hearts. He

urges that this conduct is at least criminal, because it is an occasion

and incentive of evil. Job, so holy a man, so dead to himself by long

habits of mortification, durst not cast his eyes upon a virgin. St.

Paul, not content with his continual fatigues and sufferings, added

voluntary chastisements of his flesh to subdue it. What austerities do

anchorets practise to tame their bodies, by perpetual fasts, watching,

and sackcloth! yet never suffer even visits of persons of the other sex.

Ironically inveighing against the presumption of such as had not the

like saving apprehension of danger, he tells them; "I must indeed call

these strong men happy, who have nothing to fear from such a danger, and

I could wish myself to be endowed with equal strength," (t. 1, p. 231.)

But he tells them this is as impossible as for a man to carry fire in

his bosom without being burnt. "You bid me," says he, "believe that

though I see you converse with a virgin, this is a work of piety, not

passion. O wonderful man! this may be said of those who live not with

men, but among stones," (t. 1, p. 235.) Our zealous pastor shows that

the capital point in this warfare is, not to awake our domestic enemy,

but by watchfulness to shun whatever can rouse him: and he adds, that

though a man were invulnerable, he ought not to scandalize the weak, and

by his example, draw them into a like snare. The stronger a person is,

the more easy must it be to him not to give scandal. To the pretext of

necessity, he answers, that this is mere madness, for a clergyman ought

not to be so nice, either in his furniture or table. The saint addressed

a like book to women, under this title: That regular (or religious)

Women ought not to live in the same house with Men, (t. 1, p. 248.)

Besides condemning this abuse and scandal, he zealously inveighs against

the airy, light dress of many ladies, and pathetically invites all

servants of God to mingle floods of tears with his in the bitter anguish

of his soul, for a scandal by which snares are laid for others, souls

murdered, (though undesignedly,) and sin against the divine Majesty

propagated.

St. Chrysostom seems to have been only deacon when he compiled his book

On St. Babylas, against the Gentiles; in which he speaks of the miracles

wrought at his relics, as of facts to which he and his auditors had been

eye-witnesses, (t. 2, p. 530.) Montfaucon refers to the same time his

Synopsis of the Old Testament: in which he places in the canon the

deutero-canonical books of Wisdom, Ecclesiasticus, Esther, Toby, and

Judith: and out of the seven canonical epistles counts only three, viz:

that of St. James, one of St. Peter, and one of St. John, (no others

being received by the Syrians, as appears from Cosmas Indicopleustes,)

t. 6, p. 308.

St Chrysostom was ordained priest by the patriarch Flavian, in 386, and

appointed his ordinary preacher. On this occasion the saint made a

sermon, (t. 1, p. 436,) in which he expresses his dread and surprise at

his promotion, earnestly begs the prayers of the people, {259} and says

he desires to entertain them on the praises of God, but was deterred by

the checks of his conscience, and remorse for his sins: for the royal

prophet, who invites all creatures, even dragons and serpents, to sound

forth the praises of God, passes by sinners as unworthy to be allowed a

place in that sacred choir: they are ignominiously ejected, as a

musician cuts off a string that is not tunable with the rest.

The holy doctor, grieving for the spiritual blindness of many who were

seduced by heresy, and considering their dangers as most grievous, and

their miseries most pressing, preached five most eloquent sermons on the

Incomprehensible Nature of God, against the Anomaeans. He had taken

notice that these heretics, who were very numerous in Syria, resorted

willingly to his sermons with the Catholics, which afforded him an

opportunity of more easily reclaiming them. The Anomaeans were the

followers of Eunomius, who, to the errors of the rankest Arianism, added

a peculiar blasphemy, asserting that both the blessed in heaven, and

also men in this mortal life, not only know God, but also comprehend and

fathom the divine nature as clearly as we know our own, and even as

perfectly as God comprehends himself. This fanaticism and impiety St.

Chrysostom confutes in these five homilies, demonstrating, from the

infinitude of the divine attributes, and from holy scriptures, that God

is essentially incomprehensible to the highest angels. He strongly

recommends to Catholics a modest and mild behavior towards heretics; for

nothing so powerfully gains others as meekness and tender charity; this

heals all wounds, whereas harshness exasperates and alienates the mind.

(Hom. 2, p. 461.) His method is to close every discourse with some

pathetic moral exhortation. In his third homily, On the

Incomprehensible, he complains bitterly that many who heard his sermon

with patience, left the church when it was at an end, without attending

the celebration of the divine mysteries. He shows the efficacy of public

prayer to be far greater than that of private, and a far more glorious

homage to be paid by it to God: by this St. Peter was delivered from his

chains; to it the apostles ascribed the wonderful success of their

preaching. He mentions, that ten years ago, when a magistrate condemned

for high treason was led to execution with a halter about his neck, the

citizens ran in a body to the hippodrome to beg a reprieve; and the

emperor, who was not able to reject the request of the whole city,

readily granted the criminal a full pardon. Much more easily will the

Father of mercy suffer himself to be overcome by the concord of many in

prayer, and show mercy to sinners. Not only men join the tremendous

voice during the sacred mysteries, but the angels and archangels present

to the Father of all things the body of the Lord, entreating him to have

mercy on them for whom he shed his blood, and sacrificed this very body.

"By your acclamations you testify your approbation of what is said; but

by your compliance show that your applause is sincere. This is the only

applause that can give me pleasure or joy," &c., (p. 471.) In the

following sermon (Hom. 4, p. 477) he commends their compliance by all

assisting to the end of the public office, but severely finds fault that

some conversed together in the church, and in that awful hour when the

deacon cried out, "Let us stand attentive." He bids them call to mind

that they are then raised above created things, placed before the throne

of God, and associated with the seraphims and cherubims in sounding

forth his praises, (p. 477.) In the fifth homily he again makes fervent

and humble prayer, by which all things are obtained and effected, the

subject of his moral exhortation. Public prayer is a duty which he

frequently inculcates as a most essential obligation, a homage most

honorable to God, and a most powerful means of grace to ourselves and

all mankind. (See Hom. de Obscur. Prophet, t. 6, p. 187, &c.) We have

seen other homilies of this father against the Anomaeans, in which he

proves the consubstantiality of God the Son; subjoining exhortations to

prayer, humility, good works, &c. His sermon Upon not Anathematizing,

(t. 1, p. 691,) was the fruit of his pious zeal to induce the Meletians

and Paulinians to concord, and prevent private persons from

anathematizing or branding others with the crime of heresy or schism;

censures being reserved to the chief pastors, who are very sparing in

using them. The spirit of Christ is meekness, and compassion and

tenderness the means to gain souls. By this discourse he healed the

sores left in the church of Antioch by the late schism. The Jews and the

Gentiles shared in the fruits of his zeal and charity. Eight sermons

which he preached against the Jews, whom he proves to have been cast off

by God, and their ceremonial rites abolished, have reached us, and many

others are lost. In his book Against the Jews and Gentiles, he

demonstrates the Christian religion from the propagation of the gospel,

the martyrs, prophecies, and the triumph of the cross: this ensign now

adorns the crowns of emperors, is carried by every one on his forehead,

and placed everywhere with honor, in houses, market-places, deserts,

highways, mountains, hills, woods, ships, beds, clothes, arms, vessels,

jewels, and pictures; on the bodies of beasts when sick, on energumens,

&c. We are all more adorned with it than with crowns and a thousand

precious stones; all eagerly visit the wood on which the sacred body was

crucified; men and women have small particles of it set in gold, which

they hang about their necks. On the 20th of December, 386, our saint

pronounced his discourse on St. Philogonius, the twenty-fast bishop of

Antioch. who had zealously opposed the rising heresy of Arius, and died

on this day in 322. St. Chrysostom left the subject of the panegyric to

his bishop Flavian, who {260} was to speak after him, and entertained

his people with an exhortation to the holy communion on Christmas-day,

five days after. He tells them the Magi had the happiness only of

adoring Christ, but that they who should approach him with a pure

conscience, would receive him and carry him with them; that he whose

life is holy and free from crimes, may communicate every day; but he who

is guilty in the sight of God, not even on the greatest festival.

Nevertheless, the sinner ought to prepare himself, by a sincere

conversion and by good works, during the interval of five days, and then

communicate. The Ninevites appeased the divine vengeance in three days

by the fervor of their penance.

In his homily On the Calends, or First Day of the Year, (t. 1, p. 697,)

he inveighs with great zeal against rioting and revels usual in that

season, and strongly exhorts all to spend that day in works of piety,

and in consecrating the year to God. As builders raise a wall by a ruler

or plummet, that no unevenness may spoil their work, so must we make the

sincere intention of the divine glory our rule in our prayers, fasts,

eating, drinking, buying, selling, silence, and discourse. This must be

our great staff, our arms, our rampart, our immense treasure: wherever

we are, and whatever we say or do, we must bear this motto always

written on our heart: "To the glory of God;" ever glorifying God, not

barely in words, but by all our actions in the sincere affections of our

hearts, that we may receive glory from him who says: "Those who glorify

me, I will crown with glory," (p. 697.)

In seven discourses, On Lazarus and the Rich Man, he shows that a life

of sensuality and pleasures is condemned by Christ; laments that any

Christian should abandon himself to debauchery, and declares he will

never cease to pursue sinners by his exhortations, as Christ did Judas,

to the last moment: if any remain obstinately incorrigible, he shall

esteem it a great happiness if he reclaim but one soul, or even prevent

but one sin; at least that he can never see God offended and remain

silent. (Hom. 1.) He sets off the advantages of afflictions, which are

occasions of all virtue, and even in the reprobate, at least abate the

number of their sins, and the torments of another life. In the seventh

homily, he severely condemns the diversions of the circus, and expresses

the most tender grief that any Christian should so far forget God as to

frequent them. He paternally exhorts all such to repentance; proves

afflictions and the cross to be the portion of the just in this life,

and says, "That they whom God does not visit with tribulations, ought at

least to afflict themselves by the labors of penance, the only path

which can conduct us with Lazarus to God," (p. 736.)

In the second tome, we have the holy doctor's twenty-one sermons to the

people of Antioch, or, On the Statues; the following discourses, to the

number of sixty, in the old editions not being genuine, but patched up

by modern Greeks, chiefly out of several works of this father. The great

sedition happened at Antioch on the 26th of February, 387, just after

the saint had preached the first of the sermons, in which he spoke

against drunkenness and blasphemy, pressing all persons to expel their

company any one who should blaspheme. After the sedition, he was silent,

in the general grief and consternation, for seven days: then made his

second sermon, in which he tells the people that their confusion and

remorse is itself a greater punishment than it was in the power of the

emperor to inflict; he exhorts them to alms-deeds, and to hope in the

mercy of Christ, who, leaving the earth, left us his own flesh, which

yet he carried with him to heaven, and that blood which he spilt for us,

he again imparted to us. After this, what will he refuse to do for our

salvation? The third sermon being made in the beginning of Lent, the

preacher inculcates the obligation of fasting: from his words it is

clear that Christians then abstained from wine and fish no less than

from fowls and all flesh. He insists chiefly on the moral fast of the

will from all sin, and of all the senses by self-denials in each of

them. Detraction he singles out as the most common sin, and exhorts us

to abhor, with the royal prophet, every one who secretly detracts

another; to say to such, "If you have any thing to say to the advantage

of another, I will hear you with pleasure; but if you have only ill to

tell me, this is what I cannot listen to." If detracters were thoroughly

persuaded that by their evil speeches they rendered themselves more

odious than those of whom they speak ill, they would be effectually

cured of this pestilential habit. The saint draws an inference from what

the people then saw before their eyes, and represented to them that if

emperors punish with extreme rigor those who injure their statues, with

what severity will God revenge the injury done by the detracter to his

living image, and that offered by the blasphemer to his own adorable

name. In the fourth homily, he speaks on the usefulness of afflictions,

which withdraw men from many dangers of sin, and make them earnestly

seek God. In the fifth, he continues the same subject, and shows that

they ought not to fear death, if they prepare themselves for it by

sincere penance. Their conversion he would have them begin by correcting

the habit of swearing, which had taken deep root among many of them.

This victory, he says, would be easy if every one who had contracted

such a habit would enjoin himself some penance for every oath which

should escape him, as the loss of a meal. "Hunger and thirst," says the

saint, "will put you in mind always to watch over yourself, and you will

stand in need of no other exhortation." In the sixth, he shows that

death is desirable to a Christian, who, by a penitential life, in

imitation of the holy anchorets, is dead to the world and himself. {261}

In the fourteenth, he describes the dreadful consternation with which

the whole city was filled at the sight of new troops, and of a tribunal

erected; and, to awake sinners to a sincere repentance, he sets before

their eyes the terrors of the last judgment. In the twentieth, he

exhorts them to redouble their fervor in preparing their souls for the

Paschal communion, the nearer that time approached; especially by

forgiving all injuries. In the twenty-first, which was spoken on

Easter-day, after the return of the patriarch, he recites great part of

Flavian's speech, and the emperor's gracious answer, whose clemency he

elegantly extols, with a pathetic exhortation to the people never to

forget the divine mercy. From the mention he makes of Flavian's speech,

(Hom. 3, p. 35,) it appears that our saint had concerted it with him. He

preached every day this Lent; but only these twenty-one have reached us:

and only two catechetical discourses, out of many others which he made

about Easter that year to the catechumens. In the first he censures

those who defer baptism, and explains the names and fruits of that great

sacrament; in the second, he exhorts them always to bear in mind, and to

repeat to themselves, on every occasion, those solemn words, "I renounce

thee, Satan;" and to make it the study of their whole lives to be ever

faithful to this most sacred engagement. He next puts them in mind, that

they ought to pray without intermission, and always to have God before

their eyes, at work, in the shop, abroad, sitting, or whatever else they

were doing.

About the year 392, Diodorus, bishop of Tarsus, formerly St.

Chrysostom's master, happened to preach at Antioch, and in his sermon

highly commended our saint, whom he called John the Baptist, the voice

of the church, and the rod of Moses. The people, by loud acclamations,

testified how agreeable these encomiums of their preacher were to them:

only St. Chrysostom heard them with grief and confusion, and ascribed

them to the fondness of a good master, and the charity of the people.

Afterwards, ascending the pulpit, he said that every word of the

discourse had struck him to the heart, and made him sigh within himself:

for praises sting the conscience no less than sins, when a soul is

conscious to herself how far she is from what is said of her: they only

set before her eyes the last day, in which, to her greater confusion,

all things will appear naked and as they are; for we shall not be judged

by the masks which are put on us by other men. T. 3, F. 747.

In three sermons On the Devil, he shows that the divine mercy has

restored us more by grace in our redemption, than the devil has robbed

us of by the sin of Adam; and that the punishment itself of that sin

served to set forth the excess of the divine mercy and goodness, (Hom.

1, de Diabolo, t. 2, p. 246;) that temptations and the devil's malice

are occasions of great advantage, if we make a good use of them: that

temporal calamities are sent by God: we fall into sin only by our own

malice: the devil has no power against us but by the divine permission,

and all his efforts are weak, unless by our sloth we give him power over

us. He draws a parallel between Adam sinning in paradise by his free

will, and Job victorious by patience on his dunghill under his

sufferings, of which he gives a lively description, showing them to have

been far more grievous than all the calamities under which we so easily

lose our patience and crown.

In nine homilies On Penance, he extols its efficacy, and invites all

sinners to repentance. Hom. 6, p. 316, he vehemently condemns stage

entertainments, which he calls the school of pleasure, the seat of

pestilence, and the furnace of Babylon. Hom. 3, he calls alms the queen

of virtues, and charity and compassion the key of the divine mercy. Hom.

9, p. 347, he presses all to assist assiduously at the divine mysteries,

but with attention, awe, and trembling.

In two homilies On the Treason of Judas, (p. 376,) he recommends

meekness towards persecutors, and the pardon of injuries, by which we

reap from them, without trouble of expense, the most precious of all

advantages, grace and the pardon of our sins. Speaking on the holy

eucharist, he says, that Christ gives us in it the same body which he

delivered to death for us, and that he refused not to present to Judas

the very blood which that traitor sold. (Hom. 1, de proditione Judae, t.

2, p. 383.) He repeats the same thing, (Hom. 2, ib. p. 393.) He

observes, that as God, by his word, (Gen. i. 28,) propagates and

multiplies all things in nature to the end of the world, so it is not

the priest, but Christ, by the words pronounced by the priest, and by

virtue of those which he spoke at his last supper, saying, "This is my

body," who changes the offering (or bread and wine) in every church from

that to this time, and consummates the sacrifice till his coming. (Hom.

1, ib. p. 383.)

In two homilies, On the Cross, and on the Good Thief, preached on Good

Friday, he makes many excellent reflections on the conversion of the

latter, and on the precept of our forgiving injuries, by which we become

true imitators of Christ, and inherit the privileges of his disciples.

The cross he commends as the instrument of Christ's glorious triumph,

and of our happiness.

In a homily On the Resurrection of the Dead, he proves this article to

be the foundation, both of our faith, and of our morals. In that On the

Resurrection of our Lord, he tells his flock, that on that day (which

was the solemnity of Easter) they were no longer obliged to drink only

water, to abstain from the bath, to live on herbs and pulse, and to fast

as in Lent; but that they were bound to shun intemperance: he speaks

against drunkenness, {262} and says the poor have equal reason for joy

and thanksgiving with the rich on that solemnity, the advantages which

it brings consisting in spiritual graces, not in feasting or pomp. In

the first homily, On Whitsunday, he proves, that though the descent of

the Holy Ghost is no longer manifested by miracles, since the faith had

been sufficiently established by them, it was not less real, though made

in an invisible manner in our souls, by his grace and peace. In the

second, on the same feast, he calls Whitsunday the accomplishment of all

the mysteries of our faith; and teaches that the Holy Ghost delayed his

descent, that he might not come upon the apostles in vain, or without

having been long and earnestly desired; and that he manifested his

descent by the emblem of tongues of fire, to represent that he consumes

like fire the thorns of our souls, and that his principal gift is

charity. His seven homilies On St. Paul, are standing proofs of his

singular veneration for that great apostle, and admiration of his divine

virtues. In the third, speaking of that apostle's ardent love of God,

which made ignominies and torments for his sake a triumph, and a subject

of joy and pleasure, he seems to surpass himself, (p. 481.) In the

sixth, he speaks of miracles wrought at the relics of St. Babylas at

Daphne, and says, that the devil trembled at the name of Christ, and

fled whenever it was pronounced. In many other homilies he speaks in

raptures on the admirable virtues of St. Paul, whose spirit he had

imbibed and studied in his writings and example. The miracles of St.

Babylas are the subject of a panegyric, which St. Chrysostom has left us

on that holy martyr, (ib. p. 531.) We have his panegyrics or homilies on

St. Meletius, St. Lucian, SS. Juventinus and Maximin, St. Pelagia, St.

Ignatius, St. Eustathius, St. Romanus, the Maccabees, SS. Bernice,

Prosodoche, and Domnina, St. Drosis, St. Phocas, &c., in which he

frequently and strongly recommends the most devout veneration for their

relics. See that on St. Ignatius, p. 593, &c. In homily 1, On the

Martyrs, (p. 650,) he says that the very sight of their relics more

strongly moves to virtue than the most pathetic sermons, and that their

shrines are more precious than the richest earthly treasures, and that

the advantages which these relics afford, are not diminished by their

division, but multiplied. Some being surprised that in this discourse he

had compared the crime of an unworthy communion to that of the Jews, who

crucified Christ, he made another under this title, That we are not to

preach to please Men; in which he repeats and enforces the same

comparison; but adds a serious exhortation to frequent communion, after

a sincere repentance, and the distinct confession of every sin; "For it

is not enough to say, I am a sinner, but every kind of sin is to be

expressed," (p, 667.) Though some circumstances aggravate a sacrilegious

communion beyond the crime of Judas and that of the crucifiers of

Christ; the last was doubtless, as St. Thomas Aquinas shows, far more

enormous in itself; an injury offered to Christ in his own natural form

differing from an insult which he receives hid under sacramental veils,

though it is hard to imagine that any crime into which a Christian can

fall since the death of Christ, can be more enormous than an unworthy

communion. St. Chrysostom, in his second sermon On the Martyrs, (p.

668,) bids the faithful remain a long time in prayer at their tombs, and

devoutly kiss their shrines, which abound with blessings. In that On the

Martyrs of Egypt, (p. 699,) he calls their relics dispersed in different

places, "the ramparts of the cities," &c. In that On the Earthquake, he

expresses a deep and tender concern for the public calamity, but

rejoices at the spiritual advancement of the people, saying, that this

scourge had wrought such a change in them, that they seemed to be become

angels. Two books On Prayer, bear the name of St. Chrysostom: if they

are not mentioned by the ancients among his works, that most important

subject is treated in them in a manner not unworthy his pen. This book

is made use of in many pious schools as a Greek classic, with another On

the Education of Children, full of excellent maxims, ascribed to our

saint; but unjustly, for it is a compilation, made without much method,

out of several of his sermons and other works.

The first part of the third tome, in the Benedictin edition, presents us

thirty-four elegant sermons of this saint on divers texts of holy

scripture, and on various Christian virtues and duties. Those on

forgiving injuries, humility, alms, prayer, widowhood, and three on

marriage, particularly deserve attention. That On Alms he took occasion

to preach from the extreme miseries under which he saw the beggars

groan, lying abandoned in the streets as he passed through them coming

to the church; whence it is inferred by Tillemont and others, that it

was spoken extempore, or without preparation. He says, that water does

not so easily wash away the spots of our clothes, as alms blot out the

stains of our souls. On Marriage, he proves that state to be holy, and

will not have it dishonored by profane pomps, which no custom can

authorize; as by them God is offended. Christ is to be invited to give

the nuptial blessing in the persons of the priests, and what many throw

away on musicians, would be a grateful sacrifice to God if bestowed on

the poor. Every one ought to be ambitious to set the example of so

wholesome and holy a custom, which others would imitate. What

incomparable advantages does a wife bring to a house, when she enters it

loaded with the blessings of heaven? This is a fortune far beyond all

the riches of the world. In the third discourse, he speaks of the

inviolable precept of mutual tender love which the husband and wife are

bound constantly to bear each other, and of forgetting one another's

faults, as {263} a man in engaging in this state seeks a companion for

life, the saint observes that nothing is busier than for him to make it

an affair of traffic, or a money job. A wife with a moderate fortune

usually brings more complaisance and submission, and blesses a house

with peace, union, and friendship. How many rich men, by marrying great

fortunes, in seeking to increase their estates, have forfeited the

repose of their minds for the rest of their lives. A virtuous wife gives

every succor and comfort to a family, by the virtuous education of her

children, by possessing the heart of her husband, and by furnishing

supplies for every necessity, and comfort in every distress. Virtue was

the only quality and circumstance which Abraham was solicitous about in

the choice which he made of a wife for his son. Among the letters of the

saint, which, with certain scattered homilies, fill up the latter part

of this volume, the seventeen addressed to St. Olympias, both by the

subjects and style, deserve rather the title of treatises than of

epistles.

The Lives of the Fathers, Martyrs, and Other Principal Saints. January, February, March · 第 239 / 739 题