Samuel Butler and the Simeonites

_The following article_, _which originally appeared in the_ CAMBRIDGE

MAGAZINE, 1 _March_, 1913, _is by Mr. A. T. Bartholomew_, _of the

University Library_, _Cambridge_, _who has most kindly allowed me to

include it in the present volume_. _Mr. Bartholomew’s discovery of

Samuel Butler’s parody of the Simeonite tract throws a most interesting

light upon a curious passage in_ THE WAY OF ALL FLESH, _and it is a great

pleasure to me to be able to give Butlerians the story of Mr.

Bartholomew’s_ “_find_” _in his own words_.

READERS of Samuel Butler’s remarkable story _The Way of All Flesh_ will

probably recall his description of the Simeonites (chap. xlvii), who

still flourished at Cambridge when Ernest Pontifex was up at Emmanuel.

Ernest went down in 1858; so did Butler. Throughout the book the

spiritual and intellectual life and development of Ernest are drawn from

Butler’s own experience.

“The one phase of spiritual activity which had any life in it during the

time Ernest was at Cambridge was connected with the name of Simeon.

There were still a good many Simeonites, or as they were more briefly

called ‘Sims,’ in Ernest’s time. Every college contained some of them,

but their head-quarters were at Caius, whither they were attracted by Mr.

Clayton, who was at that time senior tutor, and among the sizars of St.

John’s. Behind the then chapel of this last-named college was a

‘labyrinth’ (this was the name it bore) of dingy, tumble-down rooms,” and

here dwelt many Simeonites, “unprepossessing in feature, gait, and

manners, unkempt and ill-dressed beyond what can be easily described.

Destined most of them for the Church, the Simeonites held themselves to

have received a very loud call to the ministry . . . They would be

instant in season and out of season in imparting spiritual instruction to

all whom they could persuade to listen to them. But the soil of the more

prosperous undergraduates was not suitable for the seed they tried to

sow. When they distributed tracts, dropping them at night into good

men’s letter boxes while they were asleep, their tracts got burnt, or met

with even worse contumely.” For Ernest Pontifex “they had a repellent

attraction; he disliked them, but he could not bring himself to leave

them alone. On one occasion he had gone so far as to parody one of the

tracts they had sent round in the night, and to get a copy dropped into

each of the leading Simeonites’ boxes. The subject he had taken was

‘Personal Cleanliness.’”

Some years ago I found among the Cambridge papers in the late Mr. J. W.

Clark’s collection three printed pieces bearing on the subject. The

first is a genuine Simeonite tract; the other two are parodies. All

three are anonymous. At the top of the second parody is written “By S.

Butler. March 31.” It will be necessary to give a few quotations from

the Simeonite utterance in order to bring out the full flavour of

Butler’s parody, which is given entire. Butler went up to St. John’s in

October, 1854; so at the time of writing this squib he was in his second

term, and 18 years of age.

Cambridge Pieces · 第 30 / 33 题