CHAPTER III

A DINNER IN CARRARA

The _entresol_ of the Lorimer mansion was occupied by the dining

hall, a room of magnificent proportions and superbly conceived in

decoration, the elegance of its detail being dominated by the size

and breadth of a few features.

One wall was breached by a wide entrance, from which descended a

series of steps to a lower hall; opposite this entrance the high wall

contained an admirable reproduction of the painting of Alma Tadema of

the Hunt of Diana, between two high windows, issuing upon balconies

overlooking the Hudson; either end of the room held two enormous

mirrors framed in Japanese bronze designed in flowers, fruits, and

trailing creatures of the field; under these astonishing mirrors were

two fire places equipped in monumental brass; on the sides of the

entrance the walls were partially concealed by two large Madonnas,

one by Perugino, the other by Tintoretto, and under these pictures

two sideboards in carved teak wood held a rich assortment of blue

India ware grouped around a few high silver vases, whose surfaces in

repoussé reviewed the spoils of the hunter; the corners of the room

received four large groups of statuary, which separately symbolized

the seasons; the ceiling was a massy plane of gold unrelieved by

any designs, and from it depended three chandeliers of cut glass in

blue aqua-marine like Brazilian stones; the walls were treated with

a pale veronica blue, the chairs were of twisted Honduras bay wood,

and yellow silken curtains masked the light that poured in at the

casements, whose outlook faced the Palisades, and caught the purple

banks of the New Jersey hills.

The floor of this apartment was in Pompeian mosaic, and at its centre

rose the singular dining table, which was literally nothing else

than a huge block of stucco of a pale terra-cotta ivory color, cut

out underneath into arches, with a frieze at the edges of the table

top representing oak leaves and acorns. This rigid and somewhat

unaccommodating erection had a very beautiful effect indeed, and

added an entablature to the room that made it more stately and

impressive. Heavy rugs invested the floor, and banished its stony

coldness, which effort on their part was successfully reinforced

by the flickering and homelike light of the candles in the quaint

majolica candelabra over the mantels at both ends of the room. This

at night, but otherwise and when not animated by the presence of its

natural human occupants the great chamber uttered a note shading into

an unpleasant solemnity, as of a public hall or a museum foyer.

It was that liquid season of the year as the spring retires from

the presence of summer, leaving at the latter’s feet the garlands

of her flowers, sweeping away the last fragrant curtains of April’s

showers, and inviting the auroras of the sun to rise higher in the

skies, while, as she fades away on the white blossoms of May, she

already touches the petals of a thousand waking roses, and summons

the tides of life, upon whose floods June approaches, to renew the

world. It was indeed a little before the opening of June 2000,

that, as the shades of night fell, or rather as its shadows grew

accentuated beneath the orbed splendor of the moon, a group of six

persons were seated around the dining table of the Lorimers, whose

physiognomies and demeanors were sufficiently contrasted, though

harmonized by a common culture and deportment. The table—the stucco

block we have mentioned—was itself a picture of bounty and refined

effects. A large golden _epergne_ shaped as a cornucopia borne in the

arms of tritons on the back of a silver wave, stood at its centre,

holding a tumultuous wealth of roses, the table itself was covered

with a delicate sheeny diaper of silver threads, a _chef d’oeuvre_

of eastern workmanship, found by Robert Lorimer in a bazaar on the

east side of New York a tantalizing and wonderful mixture of linen

and metallic filaments, teazed into a low relief, on which figured

peacocks and weeping willows by sweeping streams; and the service

was—at the moment when we are called upon to observe it—made up of

faintly golden chased Bavarian glass, with old Sevres china.

At the head of the table sat Julieta Lorimer, the mother of Helen,

and the singing Andalusian orange gatherer of Robert’s youthful days;

on either side of this still beautiful woman were two contrasted

figures, one a Catholic clergyman wearing a clerical garb in which

the distinction of the wearer among the princes of the church was

simply denoted by the red buttons on his vest. Facing this dignitary

was a tall and foreign looking man with a high forehead that gained

an unnatural prolongation by reason of its retreating lines of hair

with rather somnolent and unresponsive eyes, and the relics of a

constantly vanishing smile. By his side sat his wife, a flourishing

and elderly lady somewhat over dressed and wearing a complexion of

surprising brightness and vivacity. Facing this personage and by the

side of the cardinal was a handsome man, younger than any of his sex

in the room, abundantly supplied with soft flowing chestnut hair,

having pleasant and scrutinizing eyes, a mouth of much mobility, a

matured moustache, and hands peculiarly well shaped, which, at the

moment, were drawn together before him, resting on the table while

his half turned head looked, as did all the rest of the company,

towards the sixth member of the party who had left her chair at the

opposite end of the board, from her mother, and now stood at the

foot of the Perugino Madonna, from whose sheenless surface her face

was just withdrawn, as she returned the attention of the company and

spoke. It was Helen Lorimer herself.

A very inattentive observer of the human face and form would have

been arrested by the figure before us, and his interest would have

noted the enhancement given to both by dress and action. A gown of

blue silk bound with a belt of meshed gold, held by a Chinese buckle

framing a carved, apple-green jadeite, the waist fitting loosely

and falling away from an uncovered neck encircled by a thrice wound

necklace of pearls, with sleeves slightly _epanché_, trimmed with a

gold thread, and covering tightly closed undersleeves of Irish lace,

that were kept to the wrists by two hyacinth bracelets, arrayed

this unusual person; and, as the observer’s eyes traveled upward to

the face his admiration might have passed through various phases

of approval, wonder, or delight, according to his years, and the

temperamental warmth of his appreciation of a woman’s beauty. The

face was moulded in ample lines, it carried the impress of generous

impulses, it was full and strong, but in no measure lost thereby

the imprint of a delicate and lovely femininity. Soft folds of dark

brown hair, gathered at the back of the head in a chignon, and

plaited over the forehead in rather high folds, were decorated by

two side combs of filagree gold enriched with garnets, between which

and over the chignon itself rose a twig of silver, jewelled with

red tourmalines. The hair so sumptuously arranged became the lovely

visage it framed. The noticeable impression of its shortness was

caused by the full cheeks deeply colored and wearing the complexion

of the south, but, that observation passed, the mind fastened upon

the glowing and tender eyes, that, by some habit of their owner, at

moments half shut, as if in reverie, and then opened slowly with

ravishing smiles that played around them, and lingered long enough

to permit the parted mouth to close, and reveal its rosy cushions,

which did not become voluptuously weak, but formed themselves into an

organ fitted for speech and for caresses. The nose was straight and

firm, not pronounced, not lending to the face the repugnant sense of

intellectualism; the ears were small and shell-like, barely detected

beneath the encompassing hair; her hands, raised in description,

were perhaps characterized by strength, perhaps a little broad, but

finely veined, long fingered, facile, and gracious, and wearing, as

she stands under the madonna, two rings, on the right hand, a spinel

solitaire and a diamond marquise. And her voice?—that most excellent

thing—it completes our capitulation! It is the mingled tones of a

rich contralto and the lower registers of the soprano, perhaps it

was too sweet and only seemed to gain the requisite steadiness of

authority, when raised in pitch, and urged by some dominant emotion.

The whole composition was one of character and physical charm,

with the accompanying color values of artistic dress and a noble

environment.

“Yes,” said the voice in which was vibrant a reminiscent joy, “it

was at Florence that father saw the advertisement of the sale of

this picture. I remember the evening that, as the sun embrowned the

Palazzo Vecchio, in a gorgeous sunset over the distant Piedmont

hills, we drove to the auction room in the Via Brunelleschi, and

found the room crowded with a discordant mixture of English, French,

Italians, and a few rather timid Americans upon whom however, the

discrete auctioneer placed his hopes of establishing a profitable

standard of value for his pictures. It was amusing enough. Father

was determined to have the picture because I told him I liked it,”

and here the eyes drooped, and then the play of smiles, “but he ran

against an equally determined Englishman. I think he must have had

a daughter who liked it too. Well the auctioneer was in a frenzy of

happiness trailing his bait before two such promising prizes—when

suddenly there were no more bids,” the laugh again, “and then I

saw that the Englishman and father had recognized each other; they

made some signal and declined of be used against each other for the

auctioneer’s advantage. And the last bid was not from either father

or the Englishman. The owner of the picture had made it himself. The

picture was not sold that evening; in reality, the owner was its

purchaser, but the next day the auctioneer came to father and said

something about the ‘regrettable incident’ and offered it to father

at his own terms. And so it came to America.”

Miss Lorimer had returned to her seat and the company again

readjusted themselves to their former positions. We may pause a

moment to make the individuals of this company better known. The

cardinal was the recently elected prelate Monsignor Fenton of Newark,

N. J., the tall man with his wife, Count and Countess Schinazi of

Hungary, and the handsome young American, Professor Dale of the

New York City college, a philosopher in his own behalf, and the

instructor of metaphysical youth.

“An entertaining and serviceable story indeed,” said the cardinal as

he touched his lips with the Chartreuse in a sparkling thimble of

red and gold, “but I expected you would let us know what reference

that had to the subject nearest to my own heart—the subjection of the

Church in Italy, which my daughter,” and the speaker half oblivious

of the rest turned to Helen Lorimer with a paternal gesture of

affection, “is a subject not lightly considered by yourself.”

Miss Lorimer leaned back in her chair, a tide of color deepened in

her face, an interior light added a stranger power of beauty to her

face, seeming to issue from her eyes, and she assumed such an ardor

of expectancy that the young professor gazed at her with a deliberate

and not altogether courteous absorption. Her seriousness quickly

disappeared, she moved forward, and raising the cordial to her lips

invited the group in a tone of raillery to drink in a bond of secrecy.

“Yes, I have a secret and you shall know it, but what the Cardinal, I

think, wishes you all to hear is something that happened after father

bought the picture.”

The cardinal demurred, just a trifle, saying that “he had not had the

story so much in mind, as some discussion of the savage intolerance

of the enemies of the Church, a topic of some interest to Miss

Lorimer and himself, and not distantly connected with the secret Miss

Lorimer referred to,” and the prelate again turned to the Chartreuse

appreciatively, and smiled at the matron at his side.

Julieta interrupted, “Tell the story, Helen; I remember it faintly,

but I do recall the excitement it threw your father in, and how

quickly it ended our visit in Florence. That was ten years ago; how

time flies!” and a shadow of pain, that all noticed, crossed the

speaker’s face, vanishing almost before seen, as she with a gesture

of encouragement looked up again at her daughter.

The Countess Schinazi raised her glasses inquiringly, and then

touched the arm of her husband who had been subjected to the same

entrancement which kept the young American speechless, and wondering;

“Alfred, ten years ago we were at the baths at Carlsbad, and don’t

you remember,” she dropped the glasses and tapped her dreaming

spouse a little more sharply on the shoulder, who turned to her with

the vanishing smile undergoing a peculiar expansion that threw the

lower portion of his physiognomy into an ocean of creases; “we were

at dinner with the young Misses Tarbox, when their brother came in

and said there was a report that Robert Lorimer had been killed in

Florence? Can’t you recall that?” and the tap became so sharp a

punctuation in his side, that Count Schinazi exploded volubly; “Veree

vell, my dear, veree vell. It was an occasion of some interest to me.

I svallowed a peach pit.” The laugh was general, the count’s chronic

risibility developed to his eyebrows, and the countess oscillated

with pleasure.

“It is evident that the story must be disposed of,” continued Miss

Lorimer, and her eyes moved pleasantly from the professor to the

cardinal, and back again lingering, it might have been observed, a

little longer on the former, “You see father, after he had finished

with the auctioneer, went back to the sales-room to give some

directions as to the packing and address, and to be quite sure that

the picture he had really bought, would be the one which would be

shipped. Pardon,” turning with a deprecatory smile to her Hungarian

guests, “the intimation, but these mistakes have occurred. Next to

the sales-room there had been a meeting of anarchists the night

previous, and somehow one of the speakers had alluded to the fact

that a rich American, an oppressor of the poor in his own country,

had bought at the auction then going on, an expensive painting of the

Pope, which in his opinion should be destroyed, and not be permitted

to go to a new land, to spread the seeds of superstition. Those were

his very words, as reported in the Florentine papers;” the cardinal

flushed, and he reviewed the company with a hasty and indignant

glance; “Father identified the painting, and later in the day watched

its removal. A little remnant of the anarchistic meeting was present

as the picture came out from the house, and as it was put on the

wagon to be taken away these men, as if by prearrangement rushed

on the men carrying it, and driving them off, began to hammer and

hack at the box, shouting, ‘_death to the enemy of our country_,’”

the cardinal’s eyes were now riveted on the fair woman, who was

herself conscious of his inspection, “Father saw the melee, and ran

among them, denouncing the outrage. Incensed at the interruption the

marauders attacked him, and he was knocked down and kicked, and then

the _gendarmes_ flew to the spot, and the demonstration was over,

with the culprits in the hands of the police. Father appeared against

them and they were fined. That is the story.”

“Ignorance inflamed by malice, flattering itself with the empty

nostrums of a shallow and conceited pedantry, torments—and will

torment—the church,” was the sententious reflection of the cardinal.

“And yet,” broke in the Professor, whose voice while very clear,

with the best enunciation of an American scholar, had a most musical

quality, a peculiar fluty cadence that caught the ear quickly; it was

not lost on the cardinal, and it brought a stare on the countess’s

face that meant worlds; “and yet, is not the church much to blame for

the enmity it provokes; has it wisely construed its responsibility

to the advance of human knowledge? Was it sagacious, or, less

obsequiously, was it just, to excommunicate Father Alfred Loisy at

the instigation of the superior of the Jesuits, at the beginning of

the last century, when the conflict raged over the attitude of the

church towards what was contemptuously termed modernism? The vulgar

tirades of street agitators, and the taunts of mere worldlings are

indeed despicable, but must the church remain impregnable to thought?”

“The church,” answered the cardinal, who was now thoroughly aroused,

and who, as he spoke, kept his eyes fastened on Helen Lorimer, “is

impregnable to guesses which pass for thought. It never forgets its

mission or its commission, one is to save the world—as far as it

can—the other is a divine consecration which keeps it imperturbably

within its office amid the turmoil and the tempests of contemporary

arguments. What is modernism? It has been a texture of speculations,

and practically, as far as the church antagonizes it, it has meant

the dethronement of God, so far as his creative functions are

involved, and its exculpation is what it is pleased to call the

testimony of the rocks. Nothing in physics or chemistry is alien to

religious feeling, but the process of detraction and subtraction

which reads Evolution for God is intolerable. Against a determinate

evolution the church may have little objection; it is itself an

example of determinate evolution. Newman showed that.”

“Pardon me, but I tink,” interjected the Count, while the countess

viewed him with an irrepressible pride, “I tink that the church is

as you say here in America all right. But I tink it is veery old and

just a leetle sick. It might, I tink, as you say in America ‘get

a fresh hold’ if the Pope came right here, here in these states,

vere he might be, as you say in America, a leetle more chesty, more

independent, more free, more, what you say, ‘on the job.’”

Julieta smiled, the countess frankly laughed, Helen looked musingly

at her plate, the professor was mystified, the cardinal glanced an

instant at the speaker with a fleeting expression of scorn, and the

count himself, plainly a comedian, kept the vestiges of his smile

forcibly confined to the corners of his mouth.

Again the cardinal spoke and again he directed his remarks to the

professor, while his eyes sought those of Helen Lorimer.

“As a metaphysician are you quite sure that the reports of your

senses are real, that the so-called phenomena of the world are

indubitably, profoundly, essentially true. Is a cartload of bones in

the Cretaceous as really as much of a fact as the thirst and asking

of your own soul, as the hunger after righteousness, for which there

can be no permanent assuagement outside of the postulate of God, and

some sort of authorized convention between him and man?”

The professor turned to his critic, and said with a smile that was

urbanity itself, “My dear cardinal, as a metaphysician I am not

averse to regarding the world and the reports of our senses from

several points of view, but as a natural human being I unquestionably

bow to the requirements of my environment and have no more doubt

as to the reality of all that geology tells us than I have of the

desirable existence of our hostess,” bowing to Julieta, “or the

charm of her daughter, or the necessary functions of your own

zealous service to those of your faith, and I think that the church

misjudges her prerogatives if she regards the cartload of bones from

the Cretaceous with anything else than the gravest interest, and is

prepared to accept their witness to something, as sacredly as she now

ascribes meaning to the words of revelation.”

The cardinal fidgetted a little, fingering his chartreuse, and

audibly murmured, “Philosophy inside a classroom and common sense

outside of it, are, it seems, to be irreconcilable aspects of life to

the end of the chapter.”

It was then that the voice of Miss Lorimer rich and full, captured

the ears of the disputants as she leaned over towards the professor

with a smile of reconciliation; “My friends, while the fruit is being

served to you, let me monopolize your attention to the confession

of a secret of mine own, which the cardinal knows about, and which

curiously the count has most recklessly invaded, though I bear him no

ill will on that account,” and she extended her hand deprecatingly

towards that pleased personage.

“I am sure ze company vill be much in my debt Mees Lorimer, if I

haf ze honor to have forced you, as you say in the politic, to, to

disgorge,” and the count with an ineffable grin of amusement and

satisfaction over his verbal conquest leaned back in his chair,

while the countess in a tone of petulant cajolery, waved at him with

her glasses, saying, “Really, Schinazi, you are too ridiculous,” a

reproach which developed the count’s smile as far as the ends of his

twisted moustache.

The chairs were drawn somewhat closer to the table and Miss Lorimer

continued, “Doesn’t it seem true to you all that occasions are

created to be used, and that those who use them make history. An

opportunity missed means a disfigured, or abortive, at least, record

perhaps for an individual, perhaps for a nation. Now, perhaps I will

offend you, Count, it seems to me that Europe is growing very old,

that its interest is in its memories; its energy is traditional

only. A breath would destroy it. The chastening power of revolution

has been felt there, but since 1790 no strong and lasting currents

of feeling have done much to change its political surface. Russia

is hopelessly inert, stiffened into inaction after its anxieties at

the beginning of the last century. Life there is a routine, death a

release. Faith has vanished because faith in living, in thinking, in

being, in doing has vanished too. It is a tomb of ruins, peopled by

sacristans, threaded by tourists: is it not a rubbish heap, in which

by dint of digging one can find mementoes of greatness, but where any

splendors of the spirit no longer can be described, much less felt?

Is it not wrong to leave the fountain head of our religion—yours and

mine, Cardinal—in a choked up and littered field, where its waters

of healing and life run the serious risk of being hidden in the dust

of neglect and the refuse of abuse? My secret, friends, is to bring

the Pope to this land of ours where life, movement, action, progress,

ideals, thought, play over every thing and where even the things we

hate or oppose have color and look alive?”

The silence that followed this announcement was a tribute to its

novelty, and the listeners appeared to be taking note of their

sensations, as if wondering to what extent they either cared for it,

or approved it. A slightly whimsical smile of interrogation rested on

Miss Lorimer’s face, as she looked at the Count, and perhaps it was

in response to that which made that person first break the silence,

just a little disconcerting to the last speaker.

“I tink, Mees Lorimer, that Europe iz not a charnel house as you

suggest nor edzactly a grave. It iz old, it iz a leetle, as you say,

played out. It iz tired. A good many peoples haf lived and died

there, and it iz monotinous to go on doing ze same thing so long. I

tink the trouble just now in Europe iz that she go to sleep and haf

nightmares.” The Countess glowing abundantly as she watched with

transparent happiness her husband move along the slippery path of his

elocution, led the laugh, “But it vill vake up; it iz imposs—ible dot

someting not happen—and soon veery quvick. Dere vill be what you call

a ‘meex-up,’ and den de Europe spring up, and shout, and jump up, and

cry _Allons_; I tink so.”

Professor Dale who had eagerly watched the count with not a trace of

amusement, answered across the table with his eyes still seeking the

count’s,

“Few things could be stranger than the present stupor of Europe. It

is asleep; it has the sleeping sickness. Fifty years ago in 1950 it

looked as if its toy game of kings and queens, and the rattle of its

tin soldiers was coming near an end and the people were responsively

rising to new opportunities. But it passed as a shower passes in

the night, and then deeper, deeper, the spell of a hypnotic apathy

falls, and we hear only its snores, unless as the Count Schinazi

intimates it occasionally screams at a bad dream.”

“Theodore, just the other day,” it was the pleasantly modulated

voice of Julieta, “read me a strange impeachment of Europe. It said

that Europe had become paralyzed; music and painting and literature

had come to America, and it pictured an ancient hearthstone in an

artist’s studio with chairs and instruments and easels exquisitely

made, and with a fire burning with a comforting invitation, but with

no artists, no hands to guide the strings or the brushes, and only an

old janitress looking curiously in at the half open door, while her

cat strayed forward and slept at the fire’s edge.”

“I don’t pretend to be able to talk about such things,” alertly

interjected the Countess, “but really, you know, I feel that Europe

is a play ground, a big show, an expensive continental museum with

regimentals and dressed things walking up and down and rattling

their spurs and saluting, amid splendid old palaces, and lakes with

charmed boats and rivers, fixed up with castles, and all kept going

you see, as long as America pays for the machinery and the orchestra;

Bless me! I shouldn’t say such things in the Count’s hearing, except

that as a breeder of Game Cocks in America he still honors a line

of warriors;” the malignant sally, that practically put the entire

company in a quandary, was not resented by the Count, whose smile

escaping its seclusion behind his curled moustache, as if with the

levity of an unusual freedom, spread to the roots of his hair and

the back of his ears. This benignity kept every thing in place, and

it was the intellectual accent of the Cardinal that next solicited

attention.

“Europe to-day at the beginning of the twenty-first century has

the _rigor mortis_. Its genius and talent follows the incentive

of gain. They come _here_ and they thrive. One hundred years have

administered to us an enormously enlarged culture and it insatiably

pulls from Europe every promising blade of creative power. The

stimulus of applause, of an augmented audience, and in no vulgar

sense is here also. The battle ground of opinion is here. Our hard

and boisterous crudities are passed, we are no longer menaced with

alien segregations, the ethnic problem has vanished, not altogether

by solution, but in nature, like some mythic tree, we bear many kinds

and many colors of flowers, as it were; a modified Italian—but still

Italian—rose here, a changed French—but still French—lily there, a

new Hebraic artichoke—but still Jewish—on this bough, and a less

redolent German hibiscus—but still German—on that, and all fed,

and rejoicingly fed, from the same national root. We have become

cosmic, and in our land the final clash of the conflict of opinions

approaches, unless indeed this fagged out earth is doomed to an

eternal struggle with the battle grounds changed from continent to

continent. Science and Religion offer their clues to the central

mysteries. The measure of their values is determined _here_. I think

Miss Lorimer’s plea should be respected. Let the Pope—the Head of the

Church—come to close quarters with his antagonist, the Apollyon of

material Lust, and of intellectual denial.”

“Thank you, Cardinal,” it was again the voice of the first speaker,

“I almost thought that my audacious fancy, bold as it was, had been

covered up, and thereby just a little abashed, by reflections that

were intended to keep us from considering it at all. Every one was

jumping the traces, and running a field. Yes! shall we bring the Pope

to America?”

“Quevstion! quevstion!” murmured the Count, like the impatient

voters at a primary, while the cardinal with an exorbitant curiosity

painting itself upon his expressive countenance, looked around the

table, the goal of his scrutiny evidently being the Professor, and

the unrebuked silence continued, until, as if answering the voiceless

implication that it was he who should break it, the Professor said;

“Yes! the challenge has been often given; Let it be accepted, where

the swords of both duellists are near enough to each other to not

only strike fire, but to give the _coup de grace_.”

This truculence was perhaps a little harsh for the occasion,

and Professor Dale felt its awkwardness; he turned blushing to

his neighbor; “Pardon, Miss Lorimer, but the Cardinal is an

uncompromising foe, and I suppose,” leaning to the Cardinal, “the

Church would prefer death to sufferance?”

“Hardly,” answered the prelate, “the Church has often prospered upon

little more than toleration, but on the other hand if it came to

Science, asking for sufferance, it would be told to close its doors.”

“But vy! vy!” and the Count’s voice rose with a compromising

seriousness, “dere is room for every ting, dis and dis, and dat and

dat, and so ve grow a beeg, beeg, rug, vith a tousand colors and

tousand threads, and on it the centuries come and go, and eet nefer,

nefer wear out,” the ardent Hungarian had an inspired look, and his

wife who apparently compensated him for her snubs, by an unimpaired

adulation whenever he opened his mouth, became visibly grave, and

dispensed a glance around the table, as if in admonition of his

captivating simile.

“Well! Speaking of rugs,” said the Cardinal dryly “they are

associated in my mind with Turks, and Turks are not the most

desirable citizens; they certainly are not members of the Church,

and a national rug of a thousand threads and colors is only another

metaphor for chaos.”

“You mean Cardinal,” said the Professor, “that the Count’s

promiscuous carpet, would never harmonize in color or design with the

tapestries of the Church?”

“Perhaps,” gaily rejoined Miss Lorimer, “I can twist the Count’s rug

into an image that suits the Cardinal and myself better. It shall

have a thousand colors and a thousand threads—ten thousand for that

matter—but they will not make a miscellaneous and inconsequent woof;

they will form a beautiful and gracious figure,” and the lady smiled

as if there then floated before her mind’s eye something that fled

from the profanation of a name.

The company rose with probably a different conclusion as to the value

and meaning of Miss Lorimer’s disclosure, resting in the mind of

each. But it dwelt with a singular poignancy of interest with two,

and one of these, at least, lavished upon it a wealth of improving

comment.

Scarcely had the group with gliding step reached the entrance of the

grand chamber, and the attendant had drawn aside the curtains which

revealed as they parted the noble stairway descending to a lower

plane, constituted by a wide hall now enveloped in a golden glow,

that descended from an electric corona, almost two stories above it;

from which again suites of rooms extended to the right and to the

left,—scarcely, had this moment arrived, when a resounding rap smote

the front door of the hall, and, as a servant darted towards this

entrance, the door itself was pushed from the outside, and the tall

figure of a handsome elderly man entered. The face of the stranger

was disturbed, and he flung down his walking stick with a gesture of

despair. The next moment he raised his eyes to the arrested guests,

and repressing his impatience moved to the foot of the stairway and

spoke;

“Ah! my friends you must pardon my absence. It was not intentional. I

see too well what pleasures I have missed. Of course Helen explained

to you that I was called away down town to attend a meeting of

directors of the bank, who are negotiating with the city for the

latter’s accommodation of a loan. The meeting was interrupted by an

alarm, that proved only too true, that the socialists had started

a tremendous riot on the East side, and that fire, incendiary in

origin, and attributed to them, had broken out in several quarters.

Your lecture hall, Helen, where you have attempted your propaganda of

the Divine Mission of Wealth, is burned down, and those scoundrels

of The Beehive have doubtless had a hand in it. It was a compliment

gratuitously offered to yourself, but I think it has in it the darker

meaning of a menace. Come to the porch and see the signs of the

Future.”

It was Theodore Lorimer, Helen’s uncle, who spoke, and the company,

quickly assenting to this invitation hastened down the steps, and

moved out upon the front terrace, lit by the electric globes upon

their pillars. From this point an actual fire could not be descried,

but the skies south and east beyond the intervening ridges were

plainly illuminated, the light rising and falling, and at its highest

intensity, as it scored the low lying banks of clouds with reflected

flashes, it revealed the summits of high buildings that momentarily

spanned the firelight beyond them with black columns.

Theodore Lorimer led the company to the railing of the enclosure, and

it so happened that the Professor found himself standing beside Miss

Lorimer, between two of the marble pillars. Her face was discernible

and it bore the marks of a kind of subdued anguish. She looked at him

and pointed to the horizon growing more and more lurid; “Are these

lights indeed signs of the Future as my uncle has said?”

Something intensely tender burned in the Professor’s eyes as he

answered softly; “Miss Lorimer I do not know—but when the Pope comes

we shall see whether they go out or whether they burn higher.”

“Ah!” answered Miss Lorimer, “You mock us,” and she came closer to

him with her hands clasped.

“Mockery!” he rejoined, “Mockery! Surely mockery ill suits one who

may become a supplicant, perhaps a penitant,” and the professor’s

voice had a rueful accent, and his face looked at hers with ever

so slight a glance of passion, from which she turned away with the

faintest possible sigh of disappointment.

The Mayor of New York · 第 3 / 17 章