Time and space would alike fail were we to attempt to give the most

general outline of the multitude of spiritual truths which are unveiled

in the course of the exposition of Genesis and Exodus; and not of these

two books alone, but of passages from all parts of the Word, which are

drawn upon to illustrate and confirm the truth of the interpretation.

As Wilkinson says, “Consider, gentle reader, twelve goodly 8vo volumes

[in English,] written with such continued power that it seems as if

eating, drinking, and sleeping, had never intervened between the penman

and his page, so unbroken is the subject, and so complete the sense. Add

to the other health and harmony of this unflagging man, a memory of the

most extraordinary grasp, which enabled him to administer the details

of an intellect ranging through all truth on the one hand, and through

the whole field of Scripture illustration and text upon the other. Then

take into account the unity of the work from first to last; the constant

reference that binds all parts of it together, and shows the caution

with which each strong affirmation is at first set down. Observe also

the felicity of phrase, the happiness of mind, the easy greatness, which

shine along and dignify those serious pages. Remark also, that the author

does not deal in generalities, but sentence for sentence, and word for

word, he translates his text into spiritual meaning, and criticises and

supports himself with nearly every parallel text in the sacred writings.”

The earnest reader of the “Arcana” will never question the reality of

Swedenborg’s mission. He would as soon question the reality of the world,

or his own existence. This is a strong assertion, a stranger to the work

will perhaps say; but it is only a stranger to these wondrous volumes

that will say so; for every one at all familiar with them will agree with

us. We never take down a volume of the “Arcana” to read, without feeling

more and more assured that Swedenborg was an anointed servant of the

Lord. The depths of spiritual experience he reveals, his insight into the

inmost recesses of the heart, his explanation of the causes of thoughts,

and the origin of our various desires and inclinations, of lowness of

spirits, of pleasant and dull moods, in short, of all spiritual trials

and temptations, with the heavenly ends they are permitted to serve,

together with a thousand other matters which it concerns us all to know,

are of such a nature that we cannot but feel that such knowledge must

have been derived from a Divine source, and that unless his stand-point

had been most peculiar, and providentially appointed, it would have

been impossible for him to have written as he has. To speak of the

“Arcana” as it deserves, would, to one unacquainted with it, appear like

exaggeration, while every reader would feel that we had fallen far short

of the truth in many points. No criticism, however reverential, can

adequately express the innumerable and marvellous excellencies of the

work; and should this feeble testimony to its worth excite any one to

read and _study_ it,—and it is a work which should be studied, if read at

all,—we know that he will say, as the Queen of Sheba said of Solomon, “It

was a true report that I heard of thy acts and of thy wisdom. Howbeit

I believed not the words, until I came, and mine eyes had seen it: and

behold the half was not told me.”

We have not spoken of those chapters which come between the expositions

of Scripture, because the subjects therein treated of will recur in

notices of his other books. They serve to diversify the work, and to

relieve the mind tasked with the deep thought involved in the spiritual

expositions, by the contemplation of some of the leading facts of the

future life.

The “Arcana Cœlestia” was translated into English by the late venerable

John Clowes, a clergyman of the Established Church in Manchester, and a

most cordial receiver and preacher of the doctrines of the New Church.

It is published in twelve octavo volumes, with an index prepared by

Swedenborg himself, which forms a thirteenth volume. This index has

been greatly extended by Elihu Rich, filling two large octavos. Several

editions of the “Arcana” have also been published in America; and the

sale, considering the size and cost of the work, has been in both

countries very considerable. It is a work which will in coming days

run through many cheap editions; and when that time shall come, many

will wonder why such a treasury of spiritual wisdom lay so long in our

midst, and yet men thought so little of it. But the world is approaching

Swedenborg as fast as steady progress will permit.

CHAPTER XI.

_Anecdotes._

Of Swedenborg’s external life, during the composition of the “Arcana

Cœlestia,” we know little. From his “Spiritual Diary,” we incidentally

learn that he was in Stockholm on the 23d of July, 1756. A revolution had

been attempted, and the leaders of the conspiracy, Count Brahe and Baron

Horn, were executed on that day. Swedenborg writes of Brahe thus:—“Brahe

was beheaded at ten o’clock in the morning, and spoke with me at ten at

night; that is to say, twelve hours after his execution. He was with me

almost without interruption for several days. In two days’ time, he began

to return to his former life, which consisted in loving worldly things;

and after three days, he became as he was before in the world, and was

carried into the evils that he had made his own before he died.” (S.

Diary, 5099.)

Robsahm, a friend of Swedenborg’s, probably alludes to this circumstance,

when he writes: “One day as a criminal was led to the place of execution

to be beheaded, I was by the side of Swedenborg, and asked him how such a

person felt at the time of his execution. He answered: ‘When a man lays

his head on the block, he loses all sensation. When he first comes into

the spiritual world, and finds that he is living, he is seized with the

fear of his expected death, tries to escape, and is very much frightened.

At such a moment no one thinks of anything but the happiness of heaven,

or the misery of hell. Soon the good spirits come to him, and instruct

him where he is, and he is then left to follow his own inclinations,

which soon lead him to the place where he remains for ever.’” It appears

that whatever happens at the hour of death, is carried into the other

life, and the state is continued for some time. Thus we read in the

“Spiritual Diary” of a person who had been reduced by melancholy to

despair, until being instigated by diabolical spirits, he destroyed

himself, by thrusting a knife into his body. “This spirit came to me,”

writes Swedenborg, “complaining that he was miserably treated by evil

spirits. He was seen by me, holding a knife in his hand, as though he

would plunge it into his breast. With this knife he labored very hard, as

wishing rather to cast it from him, but in vain.”

It soon became widely known that Swedenborg had intercourse with spirits;

and many and various were the demands made upon him, for information of

one kind and another. The Queen of Sweden asked him whether his spiritual

intercourse was a science or art that could be communicated to others. He

said: “No, it is the gift of the Lord.” “Can you then,” said she, “speak

with every one deceased, or only with certain persons?” He answered, “I

can not converse with all, but only with such as I have known in this

world, with all royal and princely persons, with all renowned heroes,

or great and learned men, whom I have known, either personally, or from

their actions or writings; consequently with all _of whom I could form

an idea_; for it may be supposed that a person whom I never knew, and of

whom I could form no idea, I neither could or would wish to speak with.”

The Prince of Prussia was brother to the Queen of Sweden, and shortly

after his death, Swedenborg being at court, the Queen perceiving him

said: “Well, Mr. Assessor, have you seen my brother?” He answered, “No.”

Whereupon she replied: “If you should see him, remember me to him.” In

saying this, she did but jest. Eight days afterwards, Swedenborg came

again to court, but so early that the Queen had not left her apartment

called the white room, where she was conversing with her maids of honor,

and other ladies of the court. Swedenborg did not wait for the Queen’s

coming out, but entered directly into her apartment, and whispered in

her ear. The Queen, struck with astonishment, was taken ill, and did not

recover for some time. After she was come to herself, she said to those

about her: “There is only God and my brother who can know what he has

just told me.” She owned that he had spoken of her last correspondence

with the prince, the subject of which was known to themselves alone.

The following is narrated by J. H. Jung Stilling:—“About the year 1770,

there was a merchant in Elberfeld with whom, during seven years of my

residence there, I lived in close intimacy. He spoke little; but what he

said was like golden fruit on a salver of silver. He would not have dared

for all the world to have told a falsehood. His business requiring him

to take a journey to Amsterdam, where Swedenborg at that time resided,

and having heard and read much of this strange individual, he formed the

intention of visiting him. He therefore called upon him, and found a

very venerable looking, friendly old man, who received him politely, and

requested him to be seated. Explaining his errand, and expressing his

deep admiration of Swedenborg’s writings, he desired that he would give

him a proof of his intercourse with the unseen world. Swedenborg said:

‘Why not? Most willingly.’ The merchant then proceeded to tell that he

had formerly a friend, who studied divinity at Duisburg, where he fell

into a consumption, of which he died. Visiting this friend a short time

before his decease, they conversed together on an important topic. The

question he then put to Swedenborg, was: ‘Can you learn from the student

what was the subject of our discourse at that time?’ Swedenborg replied:

‘We will see; what was the name of your friend?’ The merchant told his

name, and Swedenborg then requested him to call in a few days. Some days

after, the merchant went again to see Swedenborg, in anxious expectation.

The old gentleman met him with a smile, and said: ‘I have spoken with

your friend; the subject of your discourse was _the restitution of all

things_.’ He then related to the merchant, with the greatest precision,

what he, and what his deceased friend, had maintained. The merchant

turned pale; for this proof was powerful and invincible. He inquired

further: ‘How fares it with my friend? Is he in a state of blessedness?’

Swedenborg answered: ‘No, he is not in heaven; he is still in the world

of spirits, and torments himself continually with the idea of the

restitution of all things.’ He ejaculated: ‘My God! What! in the other

world?’ Swedenborg replied: ‘Certainly; a man takes with him his favorite

inclinations and opinions, and it is very difficult to be divested of

them. We ought, therefore, to lay them aside here.’ The merchant took his

leave, perfectly convinced, and returned to Elberfeld.”

An ambassador from Holland, named Martville, died at Stockholm. After his

death, a considerable sum of money was demanded of his widow in payment

of a debt. She felt certain the debt had been paid, but was unable to

find the receipt for the money. Being advised to consult Swedenborg,

who, she was told could converse with the dead whenever he pleased,

she adopted the advice, more from curiosity than from a belief in his

powers. The lady called on Swedenborg and told him her trouble; and he

promised if he met her husband in the spiritual world, he would inquire

of him about the matter. Eight days afterwards Martville appeared to his

wife in a dream, and mentioned to her a private place in his cabinet,

where she would not only find the receipt, but also a hair pin set with

twenty brilliants which had been given up as lost. This happened about

two o’clock in the morning. Full of joy, she arose and found them in

the place designated. She returned again to rest, and slept till nine

o’clock. About eleven Swedenborg was announced. His first remark, before

Madame had time to speak, was, that he had, during the preceding night,

seen several spirits, and among others her late husband. He had wished to

converse with him, but Martville excused himself on the ground that he

must go to discover to his wife something of importance. This account,

attested by the lady herself, was noised through all Stockholm. It may be

added that Madame desired to make Swedenborg a handsome present for his

services, which he, of course, declined.

Sometimes Swedenborg’s announcements of the states of the departed

alarmed his auditors. We read of a case of this kind which took place on

a voyage from Gottenburg to London. The vessel staying at Oresound, the

Swedish Consul invited the officers of the custom house, together with

several of the first people of the town, all anxious to see and know

Swedenborg, to dine with him at his house. Being all seated at table, and

none of them taking the liberty of addressing Swedenborg, who likewise

was silent, the Consul thought it incumbent on him to break silence,

and asked Swedenborg, as he could see and speak with the dead, whether

he had seen Christian VI., King of Denmark, after his decease. To this

he replied in the affirmative; adding, that when he saw him the first

time, he was accompanied by a bishop or other prelate, who humbly begged

the King’s pardon for the many errors into which he had led him by his

counsels. A son of the deceased prelate happened to be present at the

table: the Consul therefore fearing that Swedenborg might say something

further to the disadvantage of the father, interrupted him, saying:

“Sir, this is his son!” Swedenborg replied: “It may be, but what I am

saying is true.”

Such anecdotes might be greatly multiplied, but space forbids. No one,

perhaps, has a lower idea of the worth of these stories, as testimonies

to Swedenborg’s veracity, than the writer; yet they could not well be

omitted from an account of his life. Gossip spread them far and wide in

his own day, as is evidenced by the various forms in which they have come

down to us; and any biographer would fail in his duty did he not show

how the common world of men dealt with, and regarded Swedenborg. These

anecdotes also in some degree manifest what a kind, affable, simple, and

honest man Swedenborg was.

Having finished the “Arcana Cœlestia,” Swedenborg’s pen yet knew no

rest. In 1758 he published in London the five following works:—1. An

Account of the Last Judgment and the Destruction of Babylon; showing

that all the predictions in the Apocalypse are at this day fulfilled;

being a relation of things heard and seen. 2. Concerning Heaven and its

wonders, and concerning Hell, being a relation of things heard and seen.

3. On the White Horse mentioned in the Apocalypse. 4. On the Planets in

our solar system, and on those in the Heavens; with an account of their

inhabitants, and of their spirits and angels. 5. On the New Jerusalem and

its Heavenly Doctrines, as revealed from heaven. Let us now examine these

works in order.

CHAPTER XII.

_The Last Judgment._

To the early reader of Swedenborg’s writings, few of his declarations

appear stranger, at first, than his affirmation that the Last Judgment

is past, that it took place in 1757. Yet although startling at first, it

is a doctrine which, on closer acquaintance, readily comes within the

grasp of reason and common sense; and we discover that all its early

strangeness was owing to our having looked at it through the mist of

prejudice and preconceived opinion.

The treatise on the Last Judgment, (although, as to size, only a

pamphlet,) is a most effective and masterly exposition of the nature

of the end of the church, the new heavens, and the new earth of the

Apocalypse.

In the first place, it is shown that the day of the Last Judgment does

not mean that of the destruction of the world; for neither the visible

heaven nor the habitable earth will perish, but both will remain forever.

The reason is that the heaven of angels is formed from the human race,

all angels having lived the life of men, and none having been so created;

and as the perfection of heaven increases to eternity with the increase

of regenerate men from the world, it follows that the earth will never

cease to exist, nor men to live and be born upon it. The world is the

seminary of heaven. Heaven depends upon the world for its growth,

increase, and perfection. Heaven could not exist without worlds.

Heaven being formed from the human race, so likewise is Hell; all devils

and satans having at one time been men on this or some other earth. “That

is not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural.”

These doctrines, it will be seen, militate against what are called

orthodox opinions, which teach that angels were created before the world,

and that no man can go to heaven or to hell before the time of the Last

Judgment; when the souls of men having returned into their bodies, the

visible world will be burned up; the sun and moon be quenched in nature’s

night; and the stars, each surrounded with its own system of worlds,

having first fallen upon this speck of a globe, are to be wiped out of

existence. These common but crude and unscriptural ideas have afforded

the best subjects for scoffing at the Christian religion which the

skeptic could desire. For he triumphantly asks, How can so vast a heaven,

and so many stars, with sun and moon, be destroyed and dissipated? And

how can the stars fall from heaven upon the earth, when they are larger

than the earth? How can men’s bodies, eaten up by worms, consumed by

putrefaction, scattered to all winds, absorbed by vegetation, and again

incorporated into other men’s systems, be re-collected for their souls?

What is this day of Judgment? And has it not been expected for ages in

vain? Together with many other such questions, all pertinent, but to

which the church can give no rational answer.

And yet ignorance on such subjects cannot be excused; for men might have

known from the Word that heaven and hell are from mankind, and that man

is raised up and lives immediately after death. Information on these

subjects might have been obtained from the Lord’s words to the thief

upon the cross, “Verily I say unto thee, To-day shalt thou be with me

in Paradise;” and from those which he spoke concerning the rich man and

Lazarus, that the one went to hell, and spoke with Abraham, and that the

other went to heaven; and what the Lord told the Pharisees respecting the

resurrection, that “God is not the God of the dead, but of the living.”

And then we see how inconsistent men are with themselves on these

subjects. A worthy church-member, who is a firm believer in the burning

up of the world, and the resurrection of the dead at the Last Judgment,

comes to his death-bed, and straightway all his doctrine passes into

forgetfulness; and he talks of going home to glory in heaven, and being

within a few hours of the angels. He dies; and his friends, as orthodox

as himself, think of him as happy in heaven; and yet they profess to

believe in the resurrection of his corrupt and diseased body. What

strange inconsistency is this! But it is one of the marks of error, that

it is always inconsistent with itself.

The leading fact in Swedenborg’s doctrine of the Last Judgment, is,

that it takes place in the spiritual world, where all men congregate

after death. A judgment takes place in the world of spirits whenever a

church comes to its end; that is, when its charity, and consequently its

faith is dead, and all things that remain are mere empty forms of life.

A judgment took place at the end of the Jewish church. For proof of

this, we need only turn to the Gospel of _John_, (xii. 31,) where Jesus

said: “_Now_ is the judgment of this world: _now_ shall the prince of

this world be cast out.” We all know there was at that time no visible

judgment in the natural world. Everything went on as before; yet, we

learn from the Lord’s own lips, that a judgment was effected.

It is a great mistake, and one which even the best of men labor under,

to suppose that the soul of man exists alone, and independent of any

influences but those that are external to him, and of which he is

conscious. We would ask, Who ever saw a grain of matter independent of

the law of gravitation,—that cause which binds it to kindred matter

with a bond as indestructible as its own existence? It is the same with

men’s souls. No man lives independent of spiritual association. Place

a man in the middle of some distant and desolate island; yet he is not

alone. Around his soul are the spirits of those who have left the world

before him, who love as he loves, and think as he thinks. The minds of

men and spirits are most closely and intimately conjoined; for in the

universe of mind, as in the universe of matter, there is no such thing as

isolation and independency. And what can be more philosophical than such

a doctrine? The laws of matter represent the laws of spirit; in every

particular there exists a perfect correspondence. As matter is everywhere

bound to matter, and compacted in firm communion, so likewise are the

minds of men to be regarded as a universe of atoms, bound together by

loves and affections. In meditating on this subject, we must remember

that spirit knows nothing of material space.

The church had been declining from the days of the Apostles. Men had

forsaken the pure spirit of the gospel, and had sought to hide their

evils of life by doctrines and creeds formed from their own darkened

understandings. The popedom had arisen; and in the black night of the

dark ages, had established its fearful assumptions, and blasphemously

invoked the name of the Highest to sanctify its crimes. The Reformation,

the last flicker of an expiring candle, had indeed established free

thought, but it failed in its highest aims; and in the erroneous doctrine

of justification by faith alone, had deadened the consciences of men,

and extinguished all aspirations after spiritual life. Last and worst of

all, Atheism reared its horrid front, and openly manifested itself; yet

what of it was open and confessed, was as nothing to what lay concealed

even under the vestments of the church. Toward the middle of the last

century, Christendom had reached its lowest point of degradation; and

any one who is anxious to test this affirmation of Swedenborg’s, need

only turn to the history and literature of that period, and observe the

selfishness, the negation and ridicule of everything pure and spiritual,

the gross ignorance, the licentiousness and intemperance, and in fact

the reduction of humanity to its lowest and most bestial condition. He

will then understand the cry of the good, at that time, in the world of

spirits, “How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge

our blood on them that dwell on the earth?”

It is to be noted that from the time of the Lord’s advent, when he

effected the Judgment upon the Jewish church, there had been pouring

into the world of spirits, in countless myriads, the souls of those who

were full of evils and falsities, and who, collecting around terrestrial

humanity, lay as thick clouds between it and heaven. Forming themselves

into societies by spiritual affinities, the reformed churches were in the

middle; the Romanists around them; the Mahommedans in a still outer ring;

and the various Gentile nations constituted a vast circumference; while

beyond all, lay the appearance of a sea as a boundary. Of the states

of those associations, we have a most graphic picture in Swedenborg’s

treatise; and no where else out of the Apocalypse, do we find a more

thorough exposure of the internal atheism of the priests of Rome, their

blasphemies and subtlety. But the time of the end had come; the world

groaned to be delivered; and the eyes of Swedenborg were favored to

behold the process of the great redemption.

The vast concourse of these spirits, formed into societies, is what

is meant in the Revelation by the first heaven and the first earth

which passed away. The manner in which these societies were dissolved,

Swedenborg describes as follows:—“Visitation was made by angels, and

admonition given, and the good were singled out and separated by the

heavenly ministers, agreeable to the Lord’s words, ‘He shall send his

angels, and they shall gather together the elect from the four winds,

from one end of heaven to the other;’ and again, ‘All nations shall be

gathered together before the Son of Man; and he shall separate them one

from another, as a shepherd divideth the sheep from the goats, and he

shall set the sheep on the right hand, and the goats on the left.’” Then

followed destruction. There were great earthquakes, and a vehement wind,

which swept all before it. Then gulfs yawned, and seas appeared, into

which the wicked threw themselves, and were drawn to their place in hell.

“Then,” says Swedenborg, “I saw angelic spirits in great numbers rising

from below, and received into heaven. They were the sheep who had been

kept and guarded by the Lord, and who are understood in the Word by the

bodies of saints which arose from their sepulchres and went into the holy

city; and by the souls of those slain for the testimony of Jesus, and who

were watching; and by those who were of the first resurrection.

“After this, there was joy in heaven, and light in the world of spirits,

such as was not before; and the interposing clouds between heaven and

mankind being removed, a similar light also then arose on men in the

world, giving them new enlightenment.”

Such was the Last Judgment. Its centenary draws nigh; and how fruitful

in good to mankind has been that century which is now drawing to a

close! It is unnecessary to repeat the hackneyed phrases which tell of

the progress of the world during the last hundred years. Every newspaper

speaks of it. Everybody with open eyes observes it. It has become the

universal opinion that the world is moving onwards and upwards; yet how

few understand _why_ the world is so moving. Men have yet to learn that

effects can no more take place without adequate causes in the universe

of mind than in the universe of matter. Nowhere out of Swedenborg can we

find a description of those spiritual causes which are changing society

and revolutionizing the whole world. We, who live in the dawn of the new

era, can form, even in our highest states, but a faint conception of its

coming glory. Yet we see in the wonderful movements of our age, in its

growing benevolence, in its increasing intelligence and thoughtfulness,

and in the prodigious advances that are making in every department of

science and art, so many indubitable signs that the former things have

passed away, and that the Lord is making all things new.

Every one knows that in the Scripture, the second coming of the Lord

is described as simultaneous with the Last Judgment. We will hereafter

endeavor to prove that the Lord has indeed come, and will describe the

manner of his coming.

The reception of the doctrine of the Last Judgment is somewhat difficult,

because the comprehension of it demands the understanding of many

principles and spiritual laws unknown to the world at large, yet most

worthy of any amount of labor requisite to master them. The remembrance

of this fact will serve as an apology for any appearance of unfounded

assumption in the outline of the doctrine we have given.

CHAPTER XIII.

_Heaven and Hell._

The treatise on Heaven and Hell is among the most charming of

Swedenborg’s writings. Its subjects possess a universal attraction; for,

what believer in the immortality of man has not, at times, longed to

penetrate the awful mysteries of the unseen world? And there is nothing

unreasonable in the desire. True it is, that, until Swedenborg came, any

but the most general knowledge of the nature of the future life had been

withdrawn from mankind since the days of primeval innocence; yet not

from anything hurtful in the knowledge itself, but simply because the

sublime facts of the future state transcended the apprehension of men

immersed in worldly loves and cares, and denying and ridiculing every

idea which was not an object of sensual perception. For this reason the

Lord said to his disciples: “I have yet many things to say unto you,

but ye can not bear them now.” (_John_ xvi. 12.) We frequently see this

inability to “bear” things spiritual and divine, manifested in our own

experience. We offer Swedenborg’s treatise, for perusal, to some man of

science, full of self-confidence, with the laws and facts of the universe

at his finger’s ends; or to some deeply-read theologian. The title page

is read,—“Heaven and its Wonders, the World of Spirits, and Hell; being

a relation of things heard and seen.” It is enough. “What nonsense! What

foolishness! The lunatic! What could _he_ know of heaven or hell? How

could he get there? The impostor! None but a fool could write such a

book!” And so on. The title page settles the whole question. Now what can

be said in reply to these railers, of whom the world is full? How can

one argue with, and combat, such inveterate prejudice? Yet these people

are professing Christians. They profess to believe there is a heaven and

a hell. But, does not their condemnation of Swedenborg betray a lurking

infidelity in their hearts? If they really possessed a living faith in

the existence of heaven and hell, it could not appear to them so utterly

preposterous that some account of their nature might in these times have

been revealed, through the abounding mercy of the Lord.

But the world now contains many who are willing to receive, and able to

understand, the truths of the future life. The Lord, who never allows his

children to lack any good thing, has, in due season, given them, through

Swedenborg, this precious and delightful volume. Let us briefly enumerate

its important statements.

The spiritual world divides itself into three great regions,—Heaven, the

World of Spirits, and Hell.

Heaven is formed of all who have loved the Lord on earth by living a life

in accordance with his laws. The laws of spiritual life are known, more

or less perfectly, in all nations, even among the heathen. The lowest

of the Gentiles have some faint rays of the light of spiritual truth;

and if they live in obedience thereto, regeneration, and consequently,

heaven, is attainable by them. Yet heaven has its degrees of bliss. Good

persons of every variety of character pass into it. But the promiscuous

association of these different kinds of character would not be orderly,

and could not be blissful. By the law of spiritual gravitation, (from

which the law of natural gravitation is but a derivation, and of which it

is a type and image,) all who possess similar affections and intelligence

are drawn together, and co-ordinated in the most blissful harmony.

The infinite variety of heaven thus arranges itself, in general, into

two kingdoms; specifically into three heavens; and in particular, into

innumerable societies. The two kingdoms are respectively called celestial

and spiritual. The angels forming the celestial kingdom are characterized

by their exceeding love of the Lord and of goodness; and the angels who

form the spiritual kingdom are distinguished by their exceeding love of

their neighbor and of truth. The celestial angels are immensely wiser

than the spiritual, and their blessedness is ineffable. Specifically

there are three heavens, perfectly distinct, called the first heaven,

the second or middle heaven, and the third or highest heaven; or they

may be called external, internal, and inmost; or natural, spiritual, and

celestial. Of these three heavens the highest or third, together with

the internal of the first or lowest heaven, forms the celestial kingdom;

and the middle or second, together with the external of the first or

lowest heaven, forms the spiritual kingdom. These three heavens and

two kingdoms, arising out of the varieties of the human mind, are not

arbitrary distinctions. The external, first, or natural heaven, is formed

of those who, from a principle of obedience and duty, live in accordance

with the Divine will. The second, spiritual, or middle heaven, is formed

of such as love truth, delight in things intellectual, and at the same

time are in disinterested love to the neighbor. The inmost, third, or

celestial heaven, is formed of those who, full of love to the Lord, are

in innocence. These celestial angels, gifted with the highest wisdom

and peace, yet full of humility, indefinitely exceed all beneath them

in beauty and wisdom. The existence and order of the three heavens was

represented by the courts of the Jewish temple. The celebrated Oberlin,

a diligent reader of Swedenborg, had a plan of the courts of the temple

hung upon the walls of his church, by which he taught his hearers, that,

according to their humility, piety, fidelity, and love of being useful

to each other, would be their elevation in the Lord’s kingdom, either

to the first, second, or third heaven. We think that no one, in whom

reign the heavenly principles of “love” to the Lord and the neighbor;

“joy” in duty under all circumstances; “peace” in every change of state;

“long-suffering” under all provocations; “gentleness” of behaviour;

“goodness” of disposition, ever manifesting itself in good actions;

“faith” or truth, believed, loved, and thence trusted in; “meekness”

in doing and in suffering; “temperance” both in external and internal

delights, Gal. v. 22, would be an unwilling inhabitant of such a heaven

as Swedenborg describes. Is not this at least presumptive evidence that

he has spoken truly?

The three heavens are further subdivided into innumerable societies,

some smaller, and some larger; some consisting of myriads of angels,

and some of hundreds. Their association into societies, is a result of

similarity of character, which similarity is imaged in their faces; and a

general likeness of countenance is observed among the angels who form one

society. All who are in similar love know each other, just as men in the

world know their kindred, relations, and friends; and thus, as it were,

spontaneously associated, they feel at home and in freedom, and thence

in the full delight of their life. From this it also follows that angels

who differ much are far apart; and few depart out of their own society

into another, because to go out from their own society is like going out

of themselves, or out of their own life, and passing into another which

is not so agreeable. Nevertheless all the societies of heaven are bound

together in one perfect form, which is strictly human.

All angels are in the human form, and are just such men and women as they

were on earth, except that they have rejected the material body. That

we should have to write and enforce such truisms—for such they must

appear to a mind really rational,—is owing to the strange and ridiculous

fancies that are commonly entertained on this subject. We often hear the

departed talked of as shades, and thought of as minds without forms, or

mere thinking principles composed of some sort of ethereal vapor; and

when artists draw them, we see perhaps an exquisitely beautiful human

form, but disfigured with large feathery wings, which, having no adequate

muscles, would have no power of motion. None of these vague, shadowy,

and erroneous ideas do we find in the Bible. The angels seen by Abraham,

Lot, Manoah, the prophets, and the Lord’s disciples, were all seen as

men, and talked with as men. Our author writes thus explicitly on this

subject. “The angelic form is in every respect human; angels have faces,

eyes, ears, breasts, arms, hands, and feet; they see, hear, and converse

with each other; and, in a word, no external attribute of man is wanting,

except the natural body.”

And now comes a doctrine which on a first view may appear very mystical,

and yet when pondered over, and understood, commends itself to our belief

by a thousand irresistible evidences drawn from analogy, and confirmed

by right reason. It is, that every society of heaven is in the human

form; and that the universal heaven, viewed collectively, is also in the

human form; and is called by Swedenborg the Grand or Greatest [Maximus]

Man. Wilkinson well expresses this sublime truth. “Heaven,” he says, “is

supremely human—nay more, it is one man. As the members of the body make

one person, so before God, all good men make one humanity: every society

of the angels is a heavenly man in a lesser form, and every angel in a

least. The reason is, that God himself, (the Lord Jesus Christ,) is a

Divine Man, and He shapes His heaven into His own image and likeness,

even as He made Adam. The oneness of heaven comes from God’s unity:

its manhood from His humanity. Heaven has, therefore, all the members,

organs, and viscera of a man; its angel inhabitants, every one, are in

some province of the Grand Man. Indefinite myriads of us go to a fibre

of its humanity. Some are in the province of the brain; some in that

of the lungs; some in that of the heart; some in that of the belly;

some are in the legs and arms; and all, wherever humanized, that is to

say, located in humanity, perform spiritually the offices of that part

of the body whereto they correspond. They all work together, however

spaced apparently, just as the parts of a single man. Their space is but

their palpable liberty, and they touch the human atoms, more closely,

by offices which unite them in God, than the contiguous fibres of our

flesh.” Every society of heaven also increases in number daily, and as it

increases, it becomes more perfect; and from its perfection the universal

heaven becomes more perfect, because heaven is composed of societies.

Since increasing numbers make heaven more perfect, it is evident how

much _they_ are deceived who believe that heaven will be closed when

it becomes full. On the contrary, heaven will never be closed, for the

greater its fullness, the greater its perfection; and therefore the

angels desire nothing more earnestly than to receive new comers.

This part of our subject would require considerable expansion to make it

intelligible to minds that have never meditated on these high themes, and

whose theological education has perverted all perception of the truth on

these matters. The subject is enticing, but our limits command restraint.

It was a remark of a profane wit and epicure that “as to heaven, he had

no great longing, as he could not see what great pleasure there could

be in sitting on a cloud and singing psalms to eternity.” We have in

this expression a thought which we know to be common to many minds, but

respect for the externals of religion forbids its expression. The general

belief respecting the nature of life in heaven, is so vague, and contains

so much of clouds and psalm-singing, that it is not to be wondered at

that some free and daring spirits should openly avow their preference for

the more substantial realities of this life. And is it not a pity that

the divine glories and delights of the heavenly life should become so

veiled in mystery as to lose their attraction, and cease to be desirable?

With the exception of the church’s ignorance of the humanity, unity, and

divinity of its Saviour and Lord, no surer evidence could be adduced

of its consummation, than its inability to answer the simplest child’s

questions as to the nature of life in heaven. Let us be thankful that

man’s utmost wants, in this respect, are satisfied in the writings of

that New Church which the Lord is now raising up, and of which Swedenborg

was the divinely-appointed herald.

The sun of heaven is the Lord. The light of heaven is the divine truth,

and its heat the divine love; both proceeding from the Lord as a sun. The

sun of this world is not seen in heaven. Nature commences from the sun

of this world, and everything which is produced from it, and subsists by

it, is called natural; but the spiritual world in which heaven is, is

above nature, and entirely distinct from it, although it is ever to be

remembered that nature is a derivation from spirit, and communicates with

spirit by correspondences. We shall have more to say on this conjunction

yet perfect separation, between nature and spirit, when we come to speak

of the doctrine of degrees.

The sun of heaven, or the divine sphere of glory surrounding the Lord,

the “light which no man can approach unto,” 1 Tim. vi. 6, appears

variously to the angels of heaven according to their states of love and

intelligence. To the angels of the third heaven, the sun appears fiery

and flaming; to the angels of the second heaven, white and brilliant;

while to those of the first heaven its light is more subdued and veiled

with clouds, yet at intervals bursting forth and pouring his glorious

radiance upon them. Although the Lord is thus seen by the angels as a sun

above them, yet at times He appears in their midst, in an angelic form,

and with a resplendent countenance. What tongue can describe the rapt

adoration and ineffable joy which must thrill angelic bosoms on these

occasions!

Heaven has its times and its seasons, but they are not like those of

earth. In heaven there is no winter and no night. The times and seasons

of heaven are consequences of the variations of the states of angelic

minds. While to all appearance they are objective as on earth, they are

in reality strictly subjective. The external changes of light and heat

correspond to the internal changes of love and wisdom in the angelic

mind. Now as the angels are sometimes in a state of intense love, and

sometimes in a state of love not so intense, morning, noon, evening,

and twilight, exist in heaven as the external emblems of these changes.

Without such changes life would lose its zest. Eternal uniformity would

be eternal dullness.

Since angels are men, and live together in society like men on earth,

therefore they have garments, houses, and other things similar to those

which exist on earth, but of course infinitely more beautiful and

perfect. The garments of the angels correspond to their intelligence.

The garments of some glitter as with flame, and those of others are

resplendent as with light; others are of various colors, and some white

and opaque. The angels of the inmost heaven are naked because they are in

innocence, and nakedness corresponds to innocence. It is because garments

represent states of wisdom that they are so much spoken of in the Word,

in relation to the church and good men. Thus in Isaiah liii. 1, “Awake,

put on strength, O Zion; put on thy _beautiful garments_, O Jerusalem.”

And in Ezekiel xv. 10, the Lord says of his church: “I girded thee about

with fine linen, and covered thee with silk.” And in the Apocalypse iii.

4, 5, it is said: “They who have not defiled their _garments_, shall walk

with Me in _white_, for they are worthy. He that overcometh, the same

shall be clothed in _white raiment_.” What a depth of meaning appears in

these passages when we remember the spiritual signification of garments!

“The garments of the angels,” writes Swedenborg, “do not merely appear to

be garments, but they really are garments; for they not only see them,

but feel them, and have different ones, which they take off and put on,

laying aside those which are not in use, and resuming them when they come

into use again. That they are clothed with a variety of garments, I have

witnessed a thousand times; and when I inquired whence they obtained

them, they told me ‘from the Lord,’ and that they receive them as gifts,

and that they are sometimes clothed without knowing how. They also said

that their garments are changed according to the changes of their state.”

Since there are societies in heaven, and the angels live as men, it

follows that they have habitations, various, like all else in heaven,

according to the degree of love and wisdom in which they are principled.

No words are like Swedenborg’s own on this subject. “Whenever I have

conversed with the angels mouth to mouth, I have been present with

them in their habitations, which are exactly like the habitations on

earth called houses, but more beautiful. They contain chambers, parlors

[conclavia], and bed-chambers, in great numbers; courts also, and around

them gardens, shrubberies, and fields. Where the angels are consociated

their habitations are contiguous, or near to each other, and arranged in

the form of a city, with streets, ways, and squares, exactly like the

cities on our earth.

“I have seen palaces in heaven, magnificent beyond description. Their

upper parts were refulgent as if they were pure gold, and their lower

parts as if they were precious stones: some were more splendid than

others, and the splendor without was equaled by the magnificence within.

The apartments were ornamented with decorations which neither language

nor science can adequately describe. On the south were paradises, in

which all things were similarly resplendent; for in some places the

leaves of the trees were like silver, and the fruits like gold, while

the colors of the flowers which were arranged in beds, appeared like

rainbows; at the boundaries appeared other palaces, which terminated the

view. Such is the architecture of heaven that one might say it is the

very art itself; nor is this to be wondered at, because the art itself

is from heaven. The angels said that such things, and innumerable others

still more perfect, are presented before their eyes by the Lord, but that

nevertheless they delight their minds more than their eyes, because in

everything they see correspondences of things divine.

“The angels who constitute the Lord’s celestial kingdom, dwell for the

most part in elevated places, or mountains; those who form the spiritual

kingdom, on hills; but those who are in the lowest parts of heaven, in

places which appear as rocks. There are also angels who do not live

consociated, but separate. These dwell in the midst of heaven, and are

the best of the angels.

“The houses in which the angels dwell, are not constructed by hand, like

houses in the world, but are given them freely by the Lord, according to

their reception of good and truth. All things whatsoever which the angels

possess, they hold as gifts from the Lord; and they are supplied with

everything they need.”

We thus learn that in heaven there are not external, physical, or mental

occupations to support bodily wants, as in this world.

It was said above that the angels have not wings, as is commonly

supposed. Their power of progression far exceeds anything that wings

could supply. They have no idea of space, such as we have in the world.

All who are of like disposition spontaneously associate together in the

spiritual world. It thus follows that those are near each other who are

in a similar state, and distant who are in a dissimilar state; and that

what appears to be space in heaven is merely an external appearance,

representative of internal differences of mind. From this cause alone the

heavens are distinct from each other, and each society of heaven, and

every individual in each society. Hence also the hells are altogether

separated from the heavens.

From the same cause, any one in the spiritual world appears to be

present if another intensely desires his presence; for from that desire

he sees him in thought, and puts himself in his state. Again one person

is removed from another in proportion as he holds him in aversion; for

all aversion is from contrariety of the affections and disagreement of

the thoughts; therefore many who appear together in one place in the

spiritual world, so long as they agree, separate as soon as they disagree.

Further: when any one goes from one place to another, whether it be in

his own city, in the courts, or the gardens, or to others out of his own

city, he arrives sooner when he has a strong desire to be there, and

later when his desire is less strong; the way itself being lengthened or

shortened according to his desire of arrival. Hence again it is evident

that distances, and consequently spaces, exist with the angels altogether

according to the state of their minds.

These principles settle that often asked question, “Shall we know each

other in the future life?” We shall, if we are in the same state as

to love and truth; but if in different states, we shall not, but shall

be separate; and, moreover, we shall have no desire for acquaintance.

The only friendships in heaven are those formed on the ground of

similarity of character. If this similarity does not exist,—with the

exception perhaps of a short meeting in the world of spirits—death is an

everlasting, though in such case not a mournful, farewell.

There are governments in heaven, various according to the varied classes

of mind which compose the heavenly societies. The government of mutual

love is the only government which exists in heaven. Governors in heaven

are distinguished by love and wisdom more than others, and by willing

well to all from love; and knowing, from their superior wisdom, how

to realize the good they purpose. They do not domineer, and command

imperiously, but minister and serve: not making themselves greater than

others, but less; for they put their own good last, and the good of their

society first: nevertheless they enjoy honor and glory; for they dwell

in the midst of their society, in a more elevated situation than others,

and inhabit magnificent palaces; but they accept glory and honor, not for

the sake of themselves, but for the sake of obedience; for all in heaven

know that they enjoy honor and glory from the Lord, and that, therefore

they ought to be obeyed. These are the things which are meant by the

Lord’s words to his disciples: “Whosoever will be chief among you, let

him be your servant; even as the Son of Man came not to be ministered

unto, but to minister.” Matthew xx. 27, 28. “He that is greatest among

you, let him be as the younger: and he that is chief, as he that doth

serve.” Luke xxii. 26. A similar government prevails also in every house

in heaven; for in every house there is a master, and there are servants,

the master loving the servants, and the servants loving the master, so

that they serve each other from love. The master teaches the servants how

they ought to live, and directs what they ought to do, while the servants

obey, and perform their duties.

Divine worship performed in heaven, is much the same in externals, as

on earth. In the heavens, as on earth, there are doctrines, preachings,

and temples. As the angels have houses and palaces, so also they have

temples in which preaching is performed. Such things exist in heaven

because the angels are continually perfecting in wisdom and love. But

real divine worship in the heavens does not consist, any more than on

earth, in frequenting temples, and hearing sermons, but in a life of love

and usefulness; sermons and prayers being only means whereby the mind is

enlightened to perform its various duties. “To work is to pray,” is a

heavenly precept which we should all do well to engrave upon our hearts.

The sermons of heaven are fraught with such wisdom that nothing of the

kind in the world can be compared with them. They are all drawn from the

Word. The same Bible that we read here, the angels read in heaven; but to

them it is a very different book from what it is to us. Where we read and

think of earthly and material things, they read and think of spiritual

and divine things. To them its spiritual and celestial senses are as open

as the natural sense is to us. From the Word they derive their highest

wisdom; and through continual converse with it, they grow wiser and wiser

day by day. The Word is the wisdom of the Lord, and eternity can not

exhaust it.

All infants go to heaven, whether born within the church or out of it;

whether of pious parents or wicked ones. When infants die, they are still

infants in the other life. They are not angels, but become angels. Every

one, on his decease, is in a similar state of life to that in which he

was in the world; an infant in the state of infancy, a boy in a state

of boyhood, and a youth, a man, or an old man, in the state of youth, of

manhood, or of age; but the state of every one is afterwards changed. As

soon as infants are raised from the dead, which takes place immediately

after decease, they are carried up into heaven, and delivered to the care

of angels of the female sex, who in the life of the body loved infants

tenderly, and at the same time loved God. By these good angels, they

are educated and brought up until they attain a suitable age, when they

are transferred to other teachers. They grow up and become young men

and women; are instructed in wisdom, and trained in the duties of the

heavenly life: and when their character is fully developed, they become

settled in some society, either of the celestial or spiritual kingdom, in

agreement with their inherited genius or disposition. What a delightful

faith is this! Do not its beauty and rationality prove its truthfulness?

Many persons imagine that infants are forever infants in heaven, and that

there is indeed something infantile about all angels. This idea probably

arises from the pictures which are frequently seen, in which angels

are drawn as infants. But this is a great mistake. Children in heaven

grow up into young men and women, and the aged return to the freshness

of early manhood. They who are in heaven are continually advancing to

the spring-time of life, and the more thousands of years they live, the

more delightful and happy is the spring to which they attain; and this

progression goes on to eternity. Good women who have died old and worn

out with age, after a succession of years come more and more into the

flower of youth, and into a beauty which exceeds all the conceptions of

beauty which can be formed from what the eye has seen. In a word, _to

grow old in heaven is to grow young_. It is worthy of note, that the

human form of every man after death, is beautiful in proportion as his

love and practice of divine truths is interior. The angels of the inmost

heaven are consequently the most beautiful, because their love of truth

is the deepest, and their lives are the most perfect. “I have seen,”

says Swedenborg, “the faces of angels of the third heaven, which were so

beautiful, that no painter, with the utmost power of art, could depict

even a thousandth part of their light and life; but the faces of the

angels of the lowest heaven may, in some measure, be adequately depicted.”

It is believed by many in the world that heaven is a place of idleness,

full of refined sensual delights, of pleasant sights and harmonious

sounds; in short, some such place as a laborious tradesman, struggling

for a fortune, fancies he shall enjoy when his gains shall have enabled

him to “_retire_.” But this is a great mistake. Man’s nature remains

the same in heaven as on earth; and who has not felt that his happiest

moments are not those of mere pleasure and idleness, but those in which

he was rendering himself most eminently useful? Happiness is as little

consonant with idleness in heaven as on earth. Jesus himself said:

“My Father worketh hitherto, and I work.” John v. 17. The angels are

employed. All the delights of heaven are conjoined with uses, and are

inherent in them. In proportion to an angel’s usefulness, is his bliss.

Some spirits, we read, conceived the opinion that heavenly happiness

consisted in a life of ease, and in being served by others; but they were

told that happiness by no means consists in mere rest from employment,

because every one would then desire to take away the happiness of others

to promote his own; and since all would have the same desire, none would

be happy; that such a life would not be active but indolent, and that

indolence makes life torpid; and that without activity there can be no

happiness, and that _cessation from employment is only for the sake of

recreation_, that a man _may return_, with new vigor, to the _activity_

of his life. They who entertained the idea that heavenly joy consists in

a life of indolence, and sucking in eternal delight without employment,

were allowed some experience of such a life; and they perceived that it

is most sorrowful, and that all joy being destroyed, they would after a

time loathe and nauseate it.

Some spirits who believed that heavenly joy consists solely in praising

and celebrating God, were instructed that to praise and celebrate God

is not properly an active life; and that God has no need of praise and

celebration. The Lord’s will is that all should perform uses; and the

angels testify that in the performance of good works is the highest

freedom, conjoined with ineffable delights.

From all this it follows that heaven is full of employments, in

comparison with which those of the world are few. There are societies

whose occupation consists in taking care of infants; other societies,

whose employment is to instruct and educate them as they grow up; others

which in like manner instruct and educate the young; others which

instruct the simply good from the Christian world, and lead them in the

ways of heaven; others which perform the same office to Gentile nations;

others which defend novitiate spirits, or those who are newly arrived

from the world, from the infestations of evil spirits; some also are

attendant on those who are preparing in the world of spirits for heaven;

and some are present with those who are in hell, to restrain them from

tormenting each other beyond limit: there are also others who attend

those who are being raised from the dead. In general, angels of every

society are sent to men, that they may guard them, and withdraw them

from evil affections and consequent evil thoughts, and inspire them with

good affections, so far as they are willing to receive them. All these

employments are performed by the Lord through their instrumentality;

and hence it is that by _angels_ in the Word, in its internal sense, are

not meant _angels_, but something of the Lord; and for the same reason,

_angels_ in the Word are called _gods_.

These employments of the angels are their general employments, but every

one has his own particular duty; for every general use is composed

of innumerable others, which are called mediate, ministering, and

subservient uses. But in heaven there are so many offices that it is

impossible to enumerate them on account of their multitude. All angels

feel delight in their employment derived from the love of use, and none

from the love of self or of gain; nor is any one influenced by the love

of gain for the sake of his maintenance, because all the necessaries of

life are freely given them; their habitations, their clothes, their food.

It is De Quincey, we think, who accuses Swedenborg of sensualizing

heaven, and reducing its sublime glories to the common order of things

in this world. The assertion could only have been made through want of

personal acquaintance with the writings of Swedenborg. No one can use

the words, Isaiah lxiv. 4, quoted by the Apostle, 1 Cor. ii. 9: “Eye

hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of

man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him,” with

more fervor and truth than the New Church preacher. Everywhere we are

told by Swedenborg, that the joys and delights of heaven transcend the

highest power of language to express; everywhere we are told that our

highest ideas formed from natural things, fall indefinitely short of the

common realities of the heavenly life. Yet we also learn that the common

humanities and pleasures of this life are not lost in the next; and that

as men and women we carry with us to our eternal home every faculty

of thought and affection which we possess here. In this most rational

doctrine there is gain every way. In thinking of heaven we know we can

never overrate its bliss, think as we will; and yet with this idea is

associated nothing of dreamy vagueness. We feel that as we live well we

are but walking onwards to a pleasant home, in which all that is truest

and best in this life will go with us. What stronger incentive can a man

have to a pure and religious life than this divine faith. Entertaining

it, with what feeling may he, at the close of life, utter the poet’s

words,—

“Draw near, sweet death;

Come raise me into life!”

The condition of admission into heaven is the possession of a soul

whose existence is a continual fulfillment of those two commandments

on which the Lord says, “hang all the law and the prophets”—love to

God, and love to man. To enter heaven, we must habitually place self

last, and our neighbor first; and unless we can do this, we can never

know eternal bliss. Now we are born into this world selfish; and hence

it is truly said we are hereditarily depraved. It is the Divine will

to take all to heaven. To do this, it is necessary that we should be

divested of our corrupt hereditary nature; as the Lord said to Nicodemus:

“Verily, verily, I say unto thee, except a man be born again, he cannot

see the kingdom of God.” This regeneration of mind, this change from a

supreme love of self, to a supreme love of God and our neighbor, is, of

necessity, a gradual work. It is not accomplished in a day, nor in a

month, nor in a year. Like all Divine works, it proceeds gradually, step

by step; “first the blade, then the ear, after that the full corn in the

ear.” The regeneration of man is a Divine work, and as the Divine end in

the creation of man was the formation of heaven out of the human race,

the Lord’s providence is unceasingly exerted to draw man out of evil,

by all means consonant with the maintenance of the inalienable freedom

of his will. It thus follows that the Lord, in all his dealings with

man, has respect solely to his eternal state, and amid all the apparent

accidents and vicissitudes of life, he is present, bending them and

making them all conduce to man’s everlasting peace. Life in this world,

its cares, trials, pleasures, comforts, friendships, sympathies, and

affections, form the divinely-appointed regenerative process; and those

who will only believe this great truth, and submit to the Divine leading,

will encounter nothing in life but what is good for them; and existence

here, however bitter and painful at times, will resolve itself into a

series of lessons devised by infinite wisdom to uproot all latent and

known evils, transforming the patient sufferer into a true child of God.

The Lord permits one man to be rich, powerful, and famous, and another

to be afflicted with disease and perplexed with poverty; one to have a

settled and calm peace of mind, while another is tried and tormented

with doubts and anxieties; nor for any ultimate purpose on earth, but

solely as a means of spiritual regeneration,—as a means of making man

happy in the eternal life to come. All man’s states are under the minute

guardianship of the Lord; and each day comes round with its circle of

pleasant and unpleasant occurrences, often, apparently, the result of

accident and chance, but in truth all provided of the Divine Providence

for the eradication of evil, and the growth and nurture of goodness.

There is no trial encountered, no circumstance met, or cross endured, but

has its eternal issue; and man’s conduct in relation to it is looked upon

by the Lord with a love and interest infinitely transcending our highest

conception. All has been foreseen; and these daily recurring tasks are

appointed by that wisdom which guides the stars in their courses, and

by that love which requires eternity to satisfy the ardor with which it

would bless. With what dignity does such a faith clothe existence! What

earnestness and celestial patience must it infuse into life!

From all that has now been said, it will be very evident that heaven

is not a gift of immediate Divine mercy, to be obtained by a verbal

confession of faith at the hour of death. If man could be saved by

immediate mercy, all would be saved; even the inhabitants of hell,

and hell itself would not exist; because the Lord is Mercy itself,

Love itself, and Good itself, and wills the salvation of all, and the

damnation of no one. But man’s spirit is substantial; and if formed to

evil, to change it would be equivalent to annihilation. “The angels

declare that it were easier to change a bat into a dove, or an owl into

a bird of paradise, than to change an infernal spirit into an angel of

heaven.” “Ample experience,” writes Swedenborg, “enables me to testify

that it is impossible to implant the life of heaven in those who have

led an opposite life in the world. There were some who believed that

they should easily receive divine truths after death, when they heard

them from the angels; and that they would believe them then, amend their

lives, and be received into heaven; and the experiment was made on great

numbers of them, in order that they might be convinced that repentance

is not possible after death. Some understood the truths they heard, and

seemed to receive them; but as soon as they returned to the life of their

love, they rejected them, and even argued against them. Some rejected

them instantly, from entire unwillingness to hear them; but others were

desirous that _the life of the love they had contracted in the world,

might be taken away from them; and that angelic life, the life of heaven,

might be infused in its place_. This was permitted; but when the life of

their love was taken away, they lay as if dead, and deprived of all their

faculties. From this it was manifest that no one’s life can possibly be

changed after death, that evil life can not be changed into good life,

nor the life of an infernal into that of an angel; because every spirit

is from head to foot of the same quality as his love, and therefore of

the same quality as his life; and consequently to transmute his life into

its opposite is to destroy him altogether.” All this goes to confirm the

Lord’s declaration before quoted, “Except a man be born again, he can not

see the kingdom of God.” On no other terms can heavenly bliss be gained.

We now come to speak of the World of Spirits, which Swedenborg thus

defines: “The world of spirits is neither heaven nor hell, but an

intermediate place or state between both, into which man enters

immediately after death; and then after a certain period, the duration of

which is determined by the quality of his life in the world, he is either

elevated into heaven, or cast into hell.

“The spirits in the world of spirits are immensely numerous, because

that world is the general assembly of all immediately after their

resurrection, and all are examined there and prepared for their final

abode; but the length of their sojourn in that world is not in all cases

the same. Some only enter it, and are immediately taken up into heaven,

or cast down into hell; some remain there a few weeks, and others several

years, but none (since the Last Judgment,) more than thirty years.”

A belief in the existence of an intermediate state has been entertained

in all times and churches, except among Protestants, who, in their

anxiety to divest themselves of every remnant of Popery, rejected the

doctrine entirely, through aversion to the follies of Purgatory. A

return to the truth is however slowly taking place; not a few Protestant

divines having expressed their faith in the existence of Hades, or the

intermediate state alluded to in the literal sense of Scripture. But the

world of spirits is not to be thought of as a revived idea of Purgatory.

The soul of no man is changed in the world of spirits. “As the tree falls

so it lies.” The discipline of this life is perfected at death, and its

opportunities never return. The world of spirits is a place where the

externals of man are brought into correspondence with his internals; for

no one, either in heaven or in hell, is allowed to have a divided mind,

understanding one thing and willing another. What any one wills, he must

understand, and what he understands he must will; therefore he who wills

good in heaven, must understand truth; and he who wills evil in hell,

must understand falsities. On this account also, falses are removed from

the good in the world of spirits, and there are given them truths which

agree and harmonize with their good; but truths are removed from the

evil, and they take to themselves falses which agree and harmonize with

their evil. Let us explain this subject further.

We suppose the generality of our readers will admit that countless

thousands of good men and women among the Mahommedans, Chinese, Hindoos,

and all the heathen nations, who live according to the measure of their

light, are saved and taken to heaven. But it is very evident that they

can not go to heaven carrying with them false notions on religious

subjects, and knowing nothing of that good Lord into whose kingdom they

are about to pass. They must be instructed. They must have errors removed

from their minds, and truths implanted in their stead. Time is required

to effect these changes, and the world of spirits is the school in which

the process is accomplished. Instruction in truth is readily received by

the simply good; and after being enlightened and purified from falsity,

they are led to their eternal homes among the blessed—to those of a

disposition and order of mind like themselves.

Then, again, among Christians, there are many who die with slight

failings pertaining to them, with infirmities of temper, with bad habits

of one kind and another; yet who are really sound-hearted and good men.

Their lot can not be hell; yet with these flaws in their character, their

presence in heaven could not be pleasant, because their state of mind

is at variance with the perfect order and peace of heaven. Such, then,

remain in the world of spirits, passing through trials, and temptations,

and sufferings, until they reject all that is disorderly and impure. The

processes by which this removal of external evils is accomplished, are

frequently extremely painful, and extend over many years. Their removal

might with less difficulty have been accomplished in the present life.

The Lord warns us of this in these words: “Agree with thine adversary

quickly, while thou art in the way with him; lest at any time the

adversary deliver thee to the judge, and the judge deliver thee to the

officer, and thou be cast into prison. Verily I say unto thee, Thou shalt

by no means come out thence till thou hast paid the uttermost farthing.”

Matthew v. 25, 26. Our adversary is the truth. Truth is ever an adversary

to the evil. Elijah the prophet represented the Divine Truth. When he

approached the wicked Ahab, Ahab cried: “Hast thou found me, O mine

enemy?” “In the way with him” is in the present life; and the “prison”

is the world of spirits, often so called in the Word, out of which we

shall not be delivered until entirely divested of selfish affections,

and false principles of thought. How practical, thus viewed, becomes our

Lord’s advice! But without a knowledge of the world of spirits, and the

spiritual sense of Scripture, it is quite mystical and unintelligible.

There are many in the Christian world who have confirmed their minds in

false ideas on many religious doctrines. With such erroneous ideas they

can not enter heaven, where truth alone prevails. They therefore remain

in the world of spirits until, through instruction, they see and reject

the false persuasions they had contracted on earth. In some cases, where

false doctrine has been deeply reasoned upon, and ground, as it were,

into the mind, the process of its removal and rejection is attended with

deep and prolonged suffering.

As the good reject all false ideas in the world of spirits, so the evil

cast off all true ones. It may be asked, Why? Why should bad be made

worse? Bad is not made worse. It is for the peace of the evil themselves

that they should be divested of all truth. The presence of truth with

the wicked only adds to their torment by the continual protest it makes

against their sin. It is also well that the evil lose all truth, for the

sake of the good, whom they might trouble and disturb through the power

that truth would afford them to assume an angelic appearance; to become

wolves in sheep’s clothing; or as Paul states it, “Satan transforming

himself into an angel of light.” Hypocrites, who have used truth to

subserve their own selfish ends, remain longer than others in the world

of spirits, and endure much suffering ere they allow their means of

subtlety and mischief to depart from them. The process of divesting the

evil of the truths they possess, is described by the Lord in these words:

“Take heed, therefore, how ye hear: for whosoever hath, to him shall be

given; and whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken even that which he

seemeth to have.” Luke viii. 18. What is heard is truth. The good alone

have truth, for their goodness loves truth, and cherishes it. Truth thus

loved, multiplies; therefore it is said, “more shall be given.” The bad

may have truth in their memory, may use it for selfish purposes, and talk

much about it; nevertheless it is not theirs. Their internal evil hates

it. “Every one that doeth evil hateth the light;” and in the future life

the truth which he seemed to have, is taken from him. How just, and at

the same time how merciful, is this judgment!

Hell is the congregation of all evil spirits. As there are many heavens,

so likewise there are many hells. As the inhabitants of heaven are

arranged from similarity of goodness and truth, so the inhabitants of

hell are arranged from similarity of evil and falsity. The hells are

arranged so distinctly according to the differences of evil, that nothing

more orderly and distinct can be conceived. The Lord, speaking through

David, says: Psalm lxxxvi. 13: “Thou hast delivered my soul from the

_lowest hell_.” Thus from Scripture we derive a direct proof, if proof

were wanted, of the gradations of evil. There are several other texts to

the same effect.

The scenery of hell, like that of heaven, is in perfect correspondence

with the states of those there. It is an outbirth from the minds of its

inhabitants; and as _they_ are deformed and full of every pollution, so

their scenery is full of horrors and things abominable. “In hell there is

no sun, but the inhabitants roam in darkness corresponding to themselves,

for they are darkness: their light is artificial, as of coal fires,

meteors, ignes fatui, and the lights of night. They inhabit scenery of

which they are the souls, as bogs, fens, tangled forests, caverns, dreary

deserts, charred and ruined cities. In the milder hells, there appear, as

it were, rude cottages, which are in some cases contiguous, and resemble

the streets and lanes of a city. Within the houses infernal spirits

are engaged in continual quarrels, enmities, blows, and violences,

while the streets and lanes are full of robberies and depredations. The

inhabitants are at continual war, hating and tormenting one another,

and the cruelties they practice are indescribable.” “It is impossible

to give a description of the horrible forms of the spirits of hell. No

two are alike, although there is a general likeness in those who are in

the same evil. They are forms of contempt of others, of menace against

those who do not pay them respect, of hatreds of various kinds, and of

revenge; and in these forms, outrage and cruelty are transparent from

within; but when others commend, venerate, and worship them, their faces

are drawn up, and have an appearance of gladness arising from delight.

Some of their faces are direful and void of life, like corpses; some are

black, and others fiery, like torches; others are disfigured by pimples,

warts, and ulcers; and frequently no face appears, but instead of a face

something hairy and bony, and sometimes nothing but teeth. Their bodies

are monstrous, and their speech is the speech of anger, of hatred, of

revenge; for every one speaks from his own false, and the tone of his

voice is from his own evil. In a word they are all images of their own

hell.”

“And does Swedenborg relate such horrors?” some may ask. For facts,

we answer, Swedenborg is not to blame. Like the Israelites of old, we

would fain have our prophets “speak unto us smooth things.” Let us rid

ourselves of all morbid delicacy, and seek to know the truth. We should

all do well to peruse with patience those pages wherein our author

narrates the horrors of hell, so that we may see, shun, and detest the

evils which make hell. It is well that every man should know whither his

lust, his pride, his avarice, or anger, is leading him. If he shudder, it

is for his eternal good.

The universal hell, like heaven, is as one man,—not of beauty, as heaven,

but a hideous monster. In its collective capacity, it is the Devil and

Satan; the Devil is the name of its evil, and Satan is the name of its

falsity. There is no individual evil spirit ruling hell, and bearing

either of those names. An enlightened view of Scripture confirms this

doctrine in every point, and rids us of the innumerable absurdities which

the commonly received theory in regard to the Devil involves. There is no

spirit in hell who was not once a man on earth. There is no spirit in

hell who was ever an angel in heaven. The Lord himself rules the hells,

and by all means possible restrains their violence and mitigates their

suffering.

Some people believe that God turns away his face from man, rejects him,

and casts him into hell, and that he is angry with him on account of his

evils; and others go still further, and affirm that God punishes man, and

brings evil upon him. They also confirm this opinion from the literal

sense of the Word, in which expressions occur that appear to sustain it.

But these opinions are formed through ignorance of the real sense of

these passages, and from a blind neglect of others, the literal sense of

which teaches that God is goodness and mercy itself, and that fury is

not in him. Isaiah xxvii. 4. True doctrine declares that the Lord never

turns away his face from man, never rejects him, never casts any one into

hell, and is never angry. The Lord is continually withdrawing man from

evil and leading him to good; but man’s freedom is never taken away. If

man _will love_ evil and _will do_ perversely, the Lord does not prevent.

That man should go to hell is at variance with the Divine design; but to

infringe man’s freedom would be to destroy his life and take from him all

that is human, reducing him to the level of a machine or a brute. Those

who are in hell, cast themselves down thither, and keep themselves where

they are. “This is,” as Wilkinson says, “he last dogma of free will,—that

of a finite being perpetuating for ever his own evil, standing fast to

selfishness without end, excluding Omnipotence in all its dispensations,

and making the ‘will not’ into an everlasting ‘cannot,’ to maintain

itself out of heaven, and contrary to heaven.”

This is a very brief abstract of the leading ideas in Swedenborg’s

wondrous treatise on Heaven and Hell. We are well aware how far short it

falls of doing full justice to the work. Let us hope that what has been

said may induce some to make a personal acquaintance with it; and then

they will understand the difficulties we labor under in condensing within

a few pages its multitudinous facts and closely linked logic.

It remains only to add, that the treatise on Heaven and Hell has been

translated into English, French, and German. The English editions have

been many, and in some cases large. The latest may be accepted as a sign

of the times, being in the form of an eighteen-penny volume, a second

edition of which has been called for. We lay no claim to the gift of

prophecy, but we feel certain that the time is coming when Swedenborg’s

“Heaven and Hell” will be the most popular and extensively read of

religious books.

CHAPTER XIV.

_The White Horse—The Earths in the Universe—The New Jerusalem

and its Heavenly Doctrine._

1. The treatise on the White Horse mentioned in the Apocalypse, forms a

tract of about twenty pages. It is an exposition of the spiritual sense

of Revelation xix. 11-16. It is shown that by the heavens being opened,

the White Horse, and its rider, are represented the Lord and his Word,

and the quality of those to whom the internal truth of the Word is

revealed. The particulars of the text are all gone into and expounded,

and copious references made to the Arcana Cœlestia for fuller details.

It is to be noted that voluminous as are Swedenborg’s theological works,

that they form one harmonious whole bound together in the unity of truth,

and mutually confirming each other. Literature, we believe, contains no

example of so great a mass of writing permeated with such a consistent

spirit, and so little affected by the author’s humors and fluctuations of

mood. So far does this uniform spirit extend, that, had it been possible,

we might imagine his many volumes had been struck out of thought in one

short day, instead of being written continuously through a course of

nearly thirty years.

In this small treatise we have a list of the books in our Bible which

form the true _Word of God_. They are, in the Old Testament, the five

books of Moses; the book of Joshua; the book of Judges; the two books

of Samuel; the two books of Kings; the Psalms of David; the Prophets,

Isaiah, Jeremiah, the Lamentations, Ezekiel, Daniel, Hosea, Joel, Amos,

Obadiah, Jonah, Micah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, Haggai, Zechariah,

Malachi; and, in the New Testament, the four Evangelists, Matthew, Mark,

Luke, and John; and the Revelation. The rest have not the internal sense,

and are not to be regarded as a part of the inspired Word. We shall

have to speak of the plenary inspiration of the Word, when we come to

Swedenborg’s treatise on the Sacred Scripture, and show how broad is the

line of distinction between the Word of God and the writings of men. It

requires but a slight acquaintance with the doctrine of correspondences,

to perceive that this distinction between the books contained within the

covers of the authorized version of the Bible is not arbitrary; that it

is a distinction as marked and visible as that between God and man, or

nature and art. Apart, however, from the doctrine of correspondences,

the distinction may be sustained by the authority of the Jews, and the

indirect testimony of many of the Fathers of the Christian Church,

coupled with numerous natural reasons founded on a critical examination

of style, etc.

“The book of Job,” says Swedenborg, “was a book of the Ancient Church,”

and therefore, with the exception of the first chapters of Genesis, is

the oldest portion of the Bible. It has a kind of internal sense, but not

like that of the Word.

The exclusion of the Epistles from the Books of the Word, is perhaps,

to a new reader, the most startling of Swedenborg’s announcements. For

this exclusion and its reasons, we will simply quote his own words.

Writing to Dr. Beyer, he says: “With regard to the writings of St. Paul,

and the other Apostles, I have not given them a place in my ‘Arcana

Cœlestia,’ because they are dogmatic writings merely, and are not written

in the style of the Word, as are those of the Prophets, of David, of the

Evangelists, and of the Revelation of St. John. The style of the Word

consists throughout in correspondences, and thence effects immediate

communication with heaven; but the style of these dogmatic writings is

quite different, having, indeed, communication with heaven, but only

mediately or indirectly. The reason why the Apostles wrote in this

style, was, that the First Christian Church was then to begin through

them; consequently, the same style as is used in the Word would not have

been proper for such doctrinal tenets, which required plain and simple

language, suited to the capacities of all readers. Nevertheless, the

writings of the Apostles are very good books for the Church, inasmuch

as they insist on the doctrine of charity, and faith from charity, as

strongly as the Lord himself has done in the Gospels, and the Revelation

of St. John, as will appear evidently to any one who studies these

writings with attention.”

2. The treatise on the “Earths in the Universe” is formed from several of

those portions of the “Arcana Cœlestia,” occurring between the chapters,

expository of the spiritual sense of Genesis and Exodus. It forms a

pamphlet of about fifty pages.

Many and prolonged have been the discussions as to whether other planets

are, like our own, the abodes of human beings. Great as has been the

progress of astronomical science, the learned are yet far from being

unanimous on the question, as is evident from the recent controversy

between Prof. Whewell and Sir David Brewster. Swedenborg does not

entertain us with prolix reasonings as to whether or not the earths of

the universe are inhabited. That was a question far too trivial for his

masculine understanding. He saw that these vast spaces were not formed

by the Lord, except for the highest end, the creation of a heaven of

intelligent human beings, capable of satisfying the infinite desires

of Divine Love. The earths of the universe are peopled even as our own

globe, or are in course of preparation for it. Any other view than this

is unworthy of acceptance, and dishonorable to the highest truths of

reason and revelation.

Swedenborg was permitted to see, and hold converse with, the inhabitants

of other earths; and most interesting are his relations concerning them.

Wilkinson aptly remarks that the work now under consideration “may be

characterized as a Report on the Religion of the Universe.” Swedenborg

tells us that the dwellers in these distant spheres think of the Lord and

worship him. He describes the quality of their love and wisdom, and how

they conduct themselves toward each other. It is a pleasant thought that

the people of this world are the worst of humanity, the most sensual, and

the least abounding in true intelligence and spirituality. In other words

there is sin, and its consequent suffering, arising from the same cause

as with us; but it is not so deep nor so wide spread. The fact of the

Divine Incarnation is likewise known in other worlds, and is regarded as

the great truth of faith.

Swedenborg affirms that the moon is inhabited. We know that even those

scientific men who hold to the doctrine of a plurality of worlds, do not

believe in the habitability of the moon; because, say they, it lacks

alike water and atmosphere. To say that it has no atmosphere is very

unphilosophical. The atmosphere may not be of the same density as that

of our earth; but that it should have no sphere or aura around it, we

cannot for a moment believe. Swedenborg tells us that the Lunarians are

dwarfs, like boys of seven years old, with robust bodies and pleasant

countenances. They do not speak from their lungs, on account of the

attenuated nature of their atmosphere, but from a quantity of air

collected in the abdomen.

It is but just to state that Swedenborg speaks of Saturn as the outermost

planet of the solar system, he not being permitted to anticipate

Herschel or Neptune. An opponent might make merry over this, and say:

“Don’t you see that Swedenborg was but a dreamer? How could he know

aught of the inhabitants of other earths when he did not even know that

beyond Saturn rolled two immense worlds?” We reply, that it would have

been disorderly for him to have become possessed of such knowledge by

spiritual means. “But how so?” Because it would have compelled belief in

the spiritual doctrines he taught, without due thought and examination,

as soon as science had established the existence of these orbs; because

miracles and prophecy are not permitted in these times, for they force

and destroy man’s freedom. How easy it would be for the Lord to witness

to the truth of His Word by supernatural signs in the natural world!

Yet he does not, although belief in his Word, and life according to it,

is essential to man’s highest happiness. Belief so induced would be

worthless, because compelled. It may be said that this is mere special

pleading; but it is not so. The laws laid down in a later work of

Swedenborg’s, on the “Divine Providence,” fortify, in a most rational

manner, the truth as we have endeavoured to set it forth. It is also to

be remarked that natural truth must be discovered by its appropriate

means,—natural investigation. It was necessary that Swedenborg should be

skilled in all natural science previous to his illumination, so that he

might possess a basis for many spiritual facts which could neither have

been expressed nor made intelligible without at the same time giving

their correspondence in nature. It would have been altogether contrary

to the Divine order to have taken Swedenborg in his early youth and

ignorance, and, making him a seer, have communicated natural truth to him

in a supernatural manner.

3. “The New Jerusalem and its Heavenly Doctrine” is a brief exposition of

the leading truths of the New Church. After each of its chapters follow

references, (in some cases more extensive than the chapter itself,) to

the “Arcana Cœlestia.” These references, so numerous in Swedenborg’s

writings, do not form a dry and unreadable index, but may be looked on

as a series of precepts pertaining to moral and spiritual life. Were we

gathering a volume of gems of thought, we should find an abundance to

suit our purposes in these references.

This work has been printed as a cheap pamphlet. We know of no other work

which could more appropriately be placed in the hands of a stranger

desiring to know, without much reading, the nature of those doctrines

which Swedenborg was commissioned to reveal to the world.

CHAPTER XV.

_Anecdotes._

The trite observation that the lives of literary men are devoid of those

incidents which make up a stirring and lively biography, applies with

great truth to the career of Swedenborg. His quiet and unostentatious

life afforded but few materials for anecdotes; hence we have but faint

traces of his outward course. While writing the works we have just

noticed, from 1747 to 1758, the principal portion of his time must have

been passed in London. Few men in those days were capable of sympathy

or communion with the elevated and spiritualized mind of Swedenborg.

Yet though living as it were alone, he could not have been melancholy

or desolate. Under the care and guidance of the Lord, favored with

the company and converse of angels, and enjoying the consciousness of

fulfilling high and holy duties, he had every reason to be the cheerful

and contented man that contemporary testimony represents him. His

evenings he used often to spend with his printer, Mr. Hart, of Poppin’s

court, Fleet street. Mrs. Lewis, his publisher’s wife, knew him, and

“thought him a good and sensible man, but too apt to spiritualize

things.” Beyond a few particulars such as these, we know nothing of his

private life.

On the 19th of July, 1759, we find Swedenborg at Gottenburg. Here

occurred the following circumstance, of which Immanuel Kant, the

celebrated transcendentalist, is the narrator.

“On Saturday, at 4 o’clock, P. M.,” says Kant, “when Swedenborg arrived

at Gottenburg from England, Mr. William Castel invited him to his house,

together with a party of fifteen persons. About 6 o’clock, Swedenborg

went out, and after a short interval returned to the company, quite pale

and alarmed. He stated that a dangerous fire had just broken out in

Stockholm, at Sundermalm, (distant three hundred miles from Gottenburg,)

and that it was spreading very fast. He was restless, and went out often.

He said that the house of one of his friends, whom he named, was already

in ashes, and that his own was in danger. At 8 o’clock, after he had been

out again, he joyfully exclaimed: ‘Thank God! the fire is extinguished

the third door from my house.’ This news occasioned great commotion among

the company. It was announced to the governor the same evening. The next

morning, Swedenborg was sent for by the governor, who questioned him

concerning the disaster. Swedenborg described the fire precisely, how it

had begun, in what manner it had ceased, and how long it had continued.

On the same day the news was spread through the city; and as the governor

had thought it worthy of attention, the consternation was considerably

increased, as many were in trouble on account of their friends and

property, which might have been involved in the disaster. On Monday

evening, a messenger arrived at Gottenburg, who was despatched during the

time of the fire. In the letters brought by him, the fire was described

precisely in the manner stated by Swedenborg. On Tuesday morning, a royal

courier arrived at the governor’s with the melancholy intelligence of

the fire, of the loss it had occasioned, and of the houses damaged and

ruined, not in the least differing from that which Swedenborg had given

the moment it had ceased: the fire had been extinguished at 8 o’clock.

“What,” continues Kant, “can be brought forward against the authenticity

of this occurrence? My friend who wrote this to me, has not only examined

the circumstances of this extraordinary case at Stockholm, but also,

about two months ago, at Gottenburg, where he is acquainted with the most

respectable houses, and where he could obtain the most authentic and

complete information, as the greatest part of the inhabitants, who are

still alive, were witnesses to the memorable occurrence.”

This narrative is taken from a letter written by Kant, in 1768, to

Charlotte de Knobloch, a lady of quality. Kant, it may be remarked, was

no adherent of Swedenborg’s. Two years before writing this letter, he

had attacked him in a small work entitled, “Dreams of the Great Seer

Illustrated by Dreams of Metaphysics.” Received from such a source, we

can entertain no doubt as to the truth of the story.

At home, in Stockholm, Swedenborg did not fail to excite much curiosity

and attention, and his conduct and deportment were carefully watched. It

was observed that he seldom went to church, or received the sacrament.

This was owing partly to the contrariety of the Lutheran doctrine to

his own views, and partly, Robsahm says, to the disease of the stone,

which troubled him. In 1760, two bishops, his relations, remonstrated

with him in a friendly manner upon his remissness. He answered, that,

religious observances were not so necessary for him as for others, as

he was associated with angels. They then represented that his example

would be valuable, by which argument he suffered himself to be persuaded.

A few days previously to receiving the sacrament, he asked his old

domestics to whom he should resort for the purpose, for “he was not

much acquainted with the different preachers.” The elder chaplain was

mentioned. Swedenborg objected that “he was a passionate man and a fiery

zealot, and that he had heard him thundering from the pulpit with little

satisfaction.” The assistant chaplain was then proposed, who was not

so popular with the congregation. Swedenborg said, “I prefer him to the

other, for I hear that he speaks what he thinks, and by this means has

lost the good-will of his people, as generally happens in this world.”

Accordingly he took the sacrament from this curate.

“In general,” says Robsahm, “Swedenborg would not enter into dispute on

matters of religion. If he was necessitated to defend himself, he did it

with mildness and in a few words; but if any one would not be convinced,

and became warm in argument, he retired, saying, ‘Read my writings

attentively and without prejudice; they will answer you in my stead, and

will afford you reason to change your ideas and opinions on such things.’

“He used, at first, freely to speak of his visions and spiritual

explications of the Scriptures; but as this displeased the clergy, who

proclaimed him a heretic and madman, he resolved to be less communicative

of his knowledge in company, or, at least, more cautious, lest the

censorious should have room to blame what they could not comprehend like

himself. I once,” says Robsahm, “addressed the rector of the parish where

he lived, an old and respected clergyman, asking him what he thought

of Swedenborg’s visions and explanations of the Bible. The venerable

man answered: ‘God alone can judge of this; but I can not think him to

be such a person as many do; I have myself conversed with him, and in

company where we have been together, and I have found him to be a good

and a holy man.’

“It was remarkable that Swedenborg never endeavored to persuade any

person to receive his opinions. He was in nowise led by that self-love

which is observable in those who publish new opinions concerning church

doctrines; neither did he seek to make many proselytes, not even

communicating his thoughts and sentiments, except to those whom he

thought virtuous, disposed to hear them with moderation, capable of

comprehending them, and lovers of truth.

“It is a very singular circumstance,” continues Robsahm, “that all who

have read the writings of Swedenborg, with a desire to refute them, have

finished the attempt by adhering to his sentiments.” This assertion must

be received, however, with qualification.

Though busied with the composition of his works, and immersed in

spiritual contemplations, Swedenborg was not forgetful of the world

and of his duties to his country. In 1761 he took part in the Swedish

Diet or Parliament. Three of his memorials or addresses to the Diet,

are preserved. In the first of these he congratulates the House upon

its meetings, and counsels the redress of all grievances which cause

disaffection. In the second he advocates an alliance with France instead

of England from prudential motives, at the same time strongly protesting

against the evil of despotic governments, and the danger to liberty in

the extension of the Roman Catholic faith. The third memorial is on

the subject of finance. Count Hopken, the Swedish prime minister at

that time, leaves on record that “the most solid memorials, and the

best penned, at the Diet of 1761, on matters of finance, were presented

by Swedenborg; in one of which he refuted a large work in 4to on the

same subject, quoted the corresponding passages of it, and all in less

than one sheet.” He was likewise a member of the secret committee of

the Diet, an office to which only the most sage and virtuous were

elected. Consider, reader, for a moment, the dignity, the wisdom, and

the abounding common sense which must have permeated the whole being of

Swedenborg, to enable him to live down the obloquy attached to the name

of a “ghost-seer,” and be received with high favor and acceptance by men

of the world, sceptical and sensual!

Soon afterwards Swedenborg left Stockholm; and we find him in July,

1762, at Amsterdam. Jung Stilling received from a friend the following

interesting anecdote respecting him at this time. “I was in Amsterdam,”

says he, “in 1762, in a company in which Swedenborg was present, on the

very day that Peter III., Emperor of Russia, died. In the midst of our

conversation his countenance changed, and it was evident that his soul

was no longer there, and that something extraordinary was passing in him.

As soon as he came to himself again, he was asked what had happened to

him. He would not at first communicate it; but at length, after having

been repeatedly pressed, he said: ‘This very hour, the Emperor Peter III.

has died in his prison,’ mentioning at the same time the manner of his

death. ‘Gentlemen will please to note down the day, that they may be able

to compare it with the intelligence of his death in the newspapers.’ The

newspapers subsequently announced the Emperor’s death as having taken

place on that day.”

CHAPTER XVI.

_Doctrines of the Lord—The Sacred Scripture, Faith, and Life._

In 1763, Swedenborg published, at Amsterdam, the following works:—1.

The Doctrine of the New Jerusalem respecting the Lord; 2. The Sacred

Scripture; 3. Faith; 4. Life; 5. Continuation respecting the Last

Judgment and the Destruction of Babylon; and 6. Angelic Wisdom concerning

the Divine Love and the Divine Wisdom. We will now speak of these works

seriatim.

1. The Doctrine of the New Jerusalem concerning the Lord, is a small

treatise: but within its limits is concentrated so much light and

rationality, that we might say the question it deals with was finally

settled, did we not too well know the perversity and pertinacity of

theological error, in closing the mind against the perception of truth,

though it were manifested with angelic wisdom.

The great truth in the treatise is the Supreme Divinity of the Lord Jesus

Christ. This truth is brought forth from the collation of nearly every

passage of Scripture which, in the literal sense, bears upon the subject.

It is shown, by an invincible logic, that there is but one God; and that,

in the Bible itself, the doctrine of three persons in the Godhead is

not to be found. It is then shown that God the Lord, in the fullness of

time, came to earth, and put on human nature, or became incarnate. The

object sought to be effected by the incarnation, was the salvation of

man. From the days of Adam, mankind had been treading a downward path.

Through wickedness, all true faith and spirituality had perished. Hell

had drawn near to men, even to the possession of their bodies, as we read

in the Gospels. Isaiah describes the state of mankind thus: “Hell hath

enlarged herself, and opened her mouth without measure.” Humanity was

thus hastening to destruction, and final extinction. But the Lord Jehovah

interposed. Clothing himself with an arm of flesh, he met the powers

of hell on their own ground; and rendering himself accessible to their

attacks, in a series of the most direful temptation-combats, He reduced

Hell to order, and redeemed mankind forever from the absolute dominion

of devils. But this was not all. The human nature that the Lord had

assumed, full of hereditary corruption, was taken from the race of Jewish

kings, the most depraved and perverted to be found on earth. He purified,

glorified, and made it divine, ascending with it to heaven. The new

influences flowing through the medium of this Divine Humanity, are called

the Holy Spirit. Of the truth of this we have the most convincing proof

in John vii. 39, where it is said, “the Holy Ghost was _not yet, because_

Jesus was not yet glorified.”

From this it is very evident that the Trinity is not, as commonly

taught, a Trinity of persons, but of principles. In ourselves we see

a finite image of this Divine and Infinite Trinity. The soul of man

may be taken as the representative of Jehovah; his body represents

the Divine Humanity, or Jesus Christ; and his action or influence on

others corresponds to the Holy Spirit. Regarded in this light, that

most mystical and incomprehensible dogma of three Persons, and yet one

God, is annihilated, and we come into the enjoyment of a faith at once

scriptural, intelligible, and rational. It is impossible for us here to

go into the details of this doctrine, or give even an outline of its

proofs. To an earnest seeker after truth we can conceive no pleasure

exceeding an acquaintance with this treatise on the Lord. If, especially,

he has vexed and worn himself in reading the profitless controversies and

lucubrations of learned divines on the Trinity, his fretted and heated

mind will experience a spiritual relief similar to the natural one which

results when patience has become exhausted in vain endeavors to unfasten

a lock, and a skilled mechanic draws near, takes the work out of our

hands, and with dexterity and ease accomplishes the task in a moment.

Swedenborg lays his hand on the tangled mass of mysticism and perverted

Scripture, and straightway the Gordian knot is untied. The simplicity of

explanation fills us with amazement, and we wonder that it was never done

before.

2. The Doctrine of the New Jerusalem respecting the Sacred Scripture,

next demands our attention. The primary truth of this treatise is, that

the Sacred Scripture, or the Word, is Divine Truth itself, thus the Lord

himself. Let us see how this can be.

We are too apt to abstract books from their authors, and to regard

them as matters impersonal,—as type and paper merely. Now this is a

childish error, and a proof of the loose and external way in which we

are accustomed to think. When I speak, or write, I manifest spiritual

influences; and the force of these influences is proportionate to my

earnestness, and their effect is proportionate to the state of reception

of my hearers. Words are thus perceived to be the representatives of

spiritual forces. The action of spirit on spirit is inappreciable by the

senses; but could we look behind the veil of nature when a crowd or a

congregation is swayed hither and thither by the speech of one man, we

should see that the influence exerted was as real and actual as muscular

force. From this we learn that words are not mere sounds, but are the

sheaths or cases of spiritual life, and on this ground we at once see the

force of the Lord’s declaration, “The words that I speak unto you, they

are spirit, and they are life.” John vi. 63.

When we think of the Lord’s words, we must conjoin with the thought an

idea of the Divine Nature and Attributes. The Lord’s speech being the

manifestation of His life, must partake of its every quality, thus of

infinity and of independence of time, and consequently of adaptation to

every possible condition of mind, for infinity includes all. Bearing

these facts in mind, we can easily perceive how true it is that the Word

is the Lord Himself.

But while the Word in its inmost is the Lord, and is thus infinite, yet

as apprehended by man, who is finite, it necessarily wears a finite

aspect. It is plain that as man’s ideas become sensualized and bound

down to matter, his view of the Divine Truth, or Word, must involve many

illusions; true, certainly, in relation to him, but very far removed from

the absolute Divine Truth. Now the literal sense of the Word, as we read

it in our Bibles, is the presentation, if we may so phrase it, of the

aspect of the Lord to the natural man, whose senses constitute his court

of appeal. The Jews, to whom the Word in its literal sense was delivered,

were just such men.

Above this natural state of mind, there are two marked grades of

intelligence—the spiritual and celestial. To these, the Lord’s words bear

a far wider meaning, and are more fully instinct with the glory of the

Divine Wisdom, and the warmth of the Divine Love.

It is thus said that the Word of God has three senses—the natural, the

spiritual, and the celestial. We attribute these senses to the Word:

more correctly we should charge them to the universal human mind, whose

capacity of reception they express. To no two men, or angels, does the

Lord,—or in fact anything,—bear precisely the same appearance, or suggest

the same meaning.

These three grades, separated by discrete degrees, make up the universe

of humanity; and the enlightened eye of the true philosopher may trace

in every object of external creation an image and representation of

them. But space forbids further explanation on this head; our author’s

reasoning is, moreover, so closely linked as to admit of no curtailment.

Suffice to say, that after demonstrating the existence of an internal

sense in the Scripture, he proceeds to show the many uses of the literal

sense, and, at the same time, the manifold abuses to which it is liable,

when the laws by which it is written are not understood.

Accepting the sublime philosophy of this treatise, we find in it a

perfect refuge from the attacks of the sceptic, and discover a thousand

reasons for one we had before, for loving God’s Holy Book, trusting in

its wisdom, and committing our lives to its guidance.

3. The Doctrine of Faith of the New Jerusalem, may be best understood by

a few extracts from the treatise itself. Swedenborg writes: “The idea

attached to the term faith at the present day is this, that it consists

in thinking a thing to be so, because it is taught by the church, and

because it does not fall within the scope of the understanding. For it

is usual with those who inculcate it, to say, ‘You must believe, and not

doubt.’ If you answer: ‘I do not comprehend it,’ it is replied: ‘That is

the very circumstance which makes a doctrine an object of faith.’ Thus

the faith of the present day is a faith in what is not known, and may be

called a blind faith: and as being the dictate of one person abiding in

the mind of another, it is a historical faith. But this is not spiritual

faith.

“Genuine faith is an acknowledgment that a thing is so, because it

is true. For he who is in genuine faith thinks and speaks to this

effect:—‘This is true; and therefore I believe it.’ For faith is the

assurance with which we embrace that which is true; and that which is

true is the proper object of faith. A person of this character, also, if

he does not comprehend a sentiment, and see its truth, will say: ‘I do

not know whether this is true or not; therefore I do not yet believe it.

How can I believe what I do not comprehend? Perhaps it may be false.’

“But the common language is, that nobody can comprehend things of a

spiritual or theological nature, because they transcend our natural

faculties. Spiritual truths, however, are as capable of being

comprehended as natural truths. The reason that spiritual things admit of

being comprehended, is, because man, as to his understanding, is capable

of being elevated into the light of heaven, in which light no other

objects appear than such as are spiritual.

Life of Emanuel Swedenborg Together with a brief synopsis of his writings, both philosophical and theological · 第 30 / 32 章