CHAPTER II

THE HOW AND THE WHY OF INDIAN WARS

I have tried to set forth the character and motives of the primitive

Indian as they were affected by contact with civilization. In a word,

demoralization was gradual but certain, culminating in the final loss of

his freedom and confinement to the reservation under most depressing

conditions. It must be borne in mind that there has been scarcely any

genuine wild life among us for the past thirty-five years. Sitting

Bull's band of Sioux were the last real hostiles of their tribe to

surrender, in 1880, and Geronimo's Apaches followed in 1886.

It is important to understand the underlying causes of Indian wars.

There are people to-day who believe that the Indian likes nothing better

than going on the warpath, killing and scalping from sheer native

cruelty and lust for blood. His character as a man of peace has not

been appreciated. Yet it is matter of history that the newcomers were

welcomed in almost every case with unsuspecting kindness, and in his

dealings with the white man the original owner of the soil has been

uniformly patient and reasonable, offering resistance only under

irresistible provocation.

There have been but few noteworthy Indian wars in the history of

America. In 1629 Powhatan's brother revolted against the colonists in

Virginia, and King Philip took up arms in Massachusetts in 1675. The

Cherokee war of 1758 in North and South Carolina came next; then the

conspiracy of Pontiac in 1763, the Creek war from 1812 to 1830, and the

Seminole war from 1820 to 1833. These wars in the South were incited by

the insolence and aggressiveness of the Americans. The struggles of the

Algonquins and the Iroquois, however, were not conducted wholly on their

own initiative. These tribes were used as allies in the long-drawn-out

conflicts between the French and the English, and thus initiated into

the motives and the methods of the white man's warfare.

I doubt very much if Pontiac would have carried his policies so far had

it not been for the encouragement he received from French traders and

settlers, who assured him that King Louis would come to his assistance

in due time, with men and ammunition. Strong in this belief, as well as

in his innate sense of right and justice, he planned to unite the

scattered tribes against the invader and overthrow all the border forts

in a day. His boldness and aggressiveness were unique in the history of

Indian warfare.

At this juncture a remarkable man was chosen to guide the Indian policy

in America. Sir William Johnson had long been engaged in trade among the

Six Nations, and more especially the Mohawks. His influence among them

was very great; and it was partly through his conciliatory methods, and

partly by reason of the betrayal of his plans and the failure of the

French to keep their promises of assistance, that Pontiac, perhaps our

greatest military genius, was forced to surrender.

A sad feature of the early wars was the sufferings of those Indians who

had listened to the preaching of Jesus Christ. In Massachusetts, during

King Philip's war, the Christian Indians were treated no better than the

"heathen savages." Some were hanged, some imprisoned, and some sold as

slaves to the West Indies. At best, they lost their homes and

improvements, and nearly perished of cold and hunger. In Pennsylvania,

at Conestoga and Wyoming Valley, they were horribly murdered, and the

peaceful Moravian Indians were butchered at prayer in their church,

while no one dared say a word of protest except the Quakers.

To return to the wars in the South, many of these were mere feuds

between one or two families. The Cherokees secured concessions and

promises of better treatment from the white men, after which they

continued friendly, and helped in overcoming the Creeks and Seminoles.

Practically all Indian wars have been caused by a few self-seeking men.

For instance, a man may secure through political influence a license to

trade among the Indians. By his unprincipled practices, often in

defiance of treaty agreements, such as gross overcharging and the use of

liquor to debauch the natives, he accumulates much tainted wealth. This

he invests in lands on the border or even within the Indian territory if

ill-defined. Having established himself, he buys much stock, or perhaps

sets up a mill on Indian water-power. He gathers his family and

hirelings about him, and presently becomes a man of influence in his

home state. From the vantage point of a rough border town, peopled

largely with gamblers, saloonkeepers, and horse-thieves, this man and

his kind plot the removal of the Indian from his fertile acres. They

harass him in every way, and having at last forced resistance upon him,

they loudly cry: "Indian outbreak! Send us troops! Annihilate the

savages!"

OSCEOLA AND THE SEMINOLES

The principal causes of Indian troubles in the South were, first, the

encroachments of this class of settlers; second, the hospitable

willingness of the Indians to shelter fugitive slaves. Many of these

people had found an Elysium among the Creeks and Seminoles, and had even

intermarried among them, their offspring becoming members of the tribe.

Osceola's wife was of this class--a beautiful Indian woman with some

negro and some white blood. She was dragged away from him by unholy

traffickers in human flesh, and he was arrested for remonstrating. Who

could tolerate such an outrage? The great chief was then a young man and

comparatively unknown; but within one year he became the recognized

leader of his tribe and the champion of their cause. The country was

perfectly suited to the guerilla warfare which is characteristic of

Indians--a country in which even an Indian of another tribe would be

lost! White frontiersmen were imported to guide the army, but according

to the testimony of Beckworth, the Rocky Mountain hunter and trapper,

all gave up in disgust. The Government was forced to resort to pacific

measures in order to get the Seminoles in its power, and eventually most

of them were removed to the Indian Territory. There was one small band

which persistently refused the offered terms, and still remains in the

fastnesses of the Florida Everglades, perhaps the only unconquered band

in the United States to-day.

While the Southern tribes were deported almost in a body to what was

then the far West, the wars of the Algonquins, along the Great Lakes and

the Ohio River, scattered them far and wide in fragments. Such of the

Iroquois as had strong treaties with the Dutch colony secured permanent

reservations in the State of New York which they still occupy, having

been continuously under state control instead of that of the general

government.

CHIEF JOSEPH'S REASONING

The Black Hawk war in 1836 was the end of the Algonquin resistance.

Surely if there was ever just cause for resistance, Black Hawk had such

a cause. His case was exactly similar to that of the famous Nez Perce,

Chief Joseph, who illustrates his grievance very lucidly in the _North

American Review_ for April, 1879, in an interview with Bishop Hare of

South Dakota.

"If I ever sold any land to the Government," says he, "it was done in

this way: Suppose a man comes to me and says: 'Joseph, I want to buy

your horse.' I say to him: 'I am satisfied with my horse. I do not wish

to sell him at any price.' Then the man goes to my neighbor and says to

him: 'I want to buy Joseph's horse, but he would not sell it to me.' My

neighbor says: 'If you will buy my horse, I will throw in his horse!'

The man buys my neighbor's horse, and then he comes and claims my horse

and takes it away. I am under no obligation to my neighbor. He had

nothing to do with my horse."

It was just such dealing as this which forced Black Hawk to fight with a

handful of warriors for his inheritance. The Government simply made a

treaty with the Sacs under Keokuk, and took the land of the Foxes at the

same time. There were some chiefs who, after they had feasted well and

drunk deep and signed away their country for nothing, talked of war,

and urged Black Hawk to lead them. Then they sneaked away to play "good

Indian," and left him to bear the brunt alone.

There were no more Indian wars for thirty years. The Southwest frontiers

were now occupied by eastern tribes or their remnants, which had been

transported beyond the Mississippi during the early thirties. Only

fragments were left here and there, in New York, Pennsylvania, Ohio,

Indiana, and the South. The great Siouan race occupied nearly all the

upper valley of the Mississippi and Missouri rivers and their

tributaries. North of them dwelt the Ojibways, an Algonquin tribe with

an entirely different language. The Sioux nation proper originally

occupied a vast territory, and in the middle of the nineteenth century

they still held the southern half of Minnesota, a portion of Wisconsin

and Iowa, all of the Dakotas, part of Montana, nearly half of Nebraska,

and small portions of Colorado and Wyoming. Some of the bands were

forest Indians, hunters and trappers and fishermen, while others roamed

over the Great Plains and hunted the buffalo, elk, and antelope. Some

divided the year between the forest and prairie life. These people had

been at peace with the whites ever since the early French explorers and

the Jesuit priests had entered their country. They had traded for many

years with the Hudson Bay and American Fur companies, and no serious

difficulty had arisen, nor was any obstruction offered to the progress

of civilization.

In 1824 the United States required of the tribes in this region to

define their territory, a demand which intensified and gave a new turn

to their intertribal warfare. The use of gun, horse, and whiskey

completed the demoralization, and thus the truly "savage" warfare had

its origin, ever increasing in bitterness until it culminated in

resistance to the Government, in 1862, one hundred years after the

struggle and defeat of the great Pontiac.

THE SIOUX AND THEIR GRIEVANCES

A treaty was made in 1851 with the Minnesota Sioux to which one band was

not a party. This was the one commonly known as Inkpaduta's band, whose

usual winter resort was in northwestern Iowa. White settlers went upon

the ceded lands, and when this band returned to Spirit Lake after their

summer's roving they found it occupied. Owing to a very severe winter

and the presence of the settlements, the surrounding country became

depleted of game, and the Sioux, who were starving, sought aid among the

settlers. No doubt they became a nuisance, and were so treated, which

treatment they very naturally resented, and thus arose the "Spirit Lake

massacre." The rest of the tribe condemned the act, and Sioux from the

Redwood reservation pursued the guilty band until they overtook and

killed two of Inkpaduta's sons. The others were driven back among the

wild Sioux. This was their first offence, after more than a century of

contact with the whites.

Little Crow's band formed the east wing of the Sioux nation, and were

the first to enter reservation life. The causes of their outbreak, a few

years later, were practically the same as in many other instances, for

in its broad features the history of one Indian tribe is the history of

all. Their hunting-grounds were taken from them, and the promised

support was not forthcoming. Some of the chiefs began to "play politics"

like white men, and through their signatures, secretly given, a payment

of $98,000 due the tribe was made to the Indian traders. Little Crow

himself was involved in this steal, and was made head chief by the

whites, who wished to have some one in this position whom they could

deal with. But soon the non-payment of annuities brought the Indians to

the verge of starvation, and in despair they forced Little Crow to lead

them in revolt. In August, 1862, they massacred the agency employees and

extended their attack to the white settlers, killing many and destroying

a large amount of property, before a part of the tribe fled into Canada

and the rest surrendered to General Sibley.

Next came the struggle of the Western Sioux and Northern Cheyennes in

defence of their homes. The building of the Northern Pacific and the

Union Pacific transcontinental railroads had necessitated the making of

new treaties with these people. Scarcely was the agreement completed by

which they ceded a right of way in return for assurances of permanent

and absolute possession of other territory, including the Black Hills

and Bighorn Mountains, when gold was discovered in these regions. This

fact created great excitement and a general determination to dispossess

the Sioux of the country just guaranteed to them, which no white man was

to enter without the consent of three fourths of the adult men of the

tribe.

Public excitement was intense, and the Government found itself unable

to clear the country of intruders and to protect the rights of the

Sioux. It was reported that there were no less than fifteen thousand men

in the Black Hills district placer-mining and prospecting for the yellow

metal. The authority of the United States was defied almost openly by

the frontier press and people. Then the Indians took matters into their

own hands, carried on a guerilla warfare against immigrants, and

harassed the forts until the army was forced to enter upon a campaign

against them. In 1868 another treaty was made, but the great chief, Red

Cloud, would not sign it until he saw forts C. F. Smith and Phil Kearney

abandoned. Here is probably the only instance in American history in

which a single Indian chief was able to enforce his demands and make a

great government back down. At that time it would have cost immense sums

of money and many lives to conquer him, and would have retarded the

development of the West by many years.

It is a fact that Sitting Bull was thoroughly opposed to yielding any

more territory. No doubt he foresaw the inevitable result. He had taken

up the cause of the Eastern Sioux in Minnesota and fought Sibley and

Sully in 1862. He had supported Red Cloud in his protests against the

establishment of the Bozeman trail, and against the new forts, although

thus far these aggressions had not affected him directly. But when

surveyors began work on the Northern Pacific, they entered his

particular domain, and it was time for him to fight in its defence.

Unfortunately for him, the other bands of Sioux whom he had helped in

their time of need were now all settled upon reservations, so that he

had not much support except from Crazy Horse's band, and the so-called

hostiles or renegades of the Western bands. Hostilities began in 1872,

culminating in 1876 with the famous "Custer fight," which practically

ended the struggle, for after annihilating Custer's command the Indians

fled into British America. Four years later Sitting Bull was induced to

come in and settle down upon the Sioux reservation.

The Modoc war in Oregon and Idaho, in which the Shoshones and Bannocks

were involved, was really a part of this same movement--namely, the last

defence of their hunting-grounds by the Plains Indians, as was also the

resistance of the Cheyennes and Comanches farther south, and of the Utes

in 1877, simultaneously with the last stand of the Sioux. It had been

found impossible to conquer the Plains Indians without destroying the

buffalo, their main subsistence. Therefore vast herds were ruthlessly

destroyed by the United States army, and by 1880 they were practically

extinct. Since it was found cheaper to feed than to fight them, the

one-time warriors were corralled upon their reservations and kept alive

upon Government rations.

THE "GHOST-DANCE WAR"

All Indian warfare worthy the name had now come to an end. There were

left Geronimo's small bands of Apaches, who were hunted down in an all

but inaccessible country and finally captured and confined in Southern

forts. More recent "Indian outbreaks," so-called, are usually a mere

ruse of the politicians, or are riots caused by the disaffection of a

few Indians unjustly treated by their Government agents. The only really

serious disturbance within a generation was the "Ghost-dance war" of

1890-91. And yet this cannot fairly be called an Indian war. It arose in

a religious craze which need not have been a serious matter if wisely

handled. The people were hungry and disheartened, their future looked

hopeless, and all their appeals were disregarded. At this juncture the

suggestion of a Messiah, offering hope of miraculous intervention in

behalf of the red man, appealed to many, and the "new religion" spread

far and fast. In some tribes it soon died a natural death, but in the

Sioux country it was unwisely forbidden by the authorities, and led to

grave results.

At Pine Ridge, in December of 1890, the ghost-dancers had come in to the

agency and the situation was apparently under control when the attempted

arrest of Sitting Bull in his cabin by Indian police led to his death

and the stampeding of his people. Several of the stampeded bands came

down to Pine Ridge, where they were met by United States troops,

disarmed, and shot down after one man had resisted disarmament by firing

off his weapon. This was the massacre of Wounded Knee, where about 300

Indians, two thirds of them women and children, were mown down with

machine-guns within a few minutes. For some days there was danger of a

reprisal, but the crisis passed, and those Indians who had fled to the

"Bad Lands" were induced to come in and surrender. From that time on the

Indian tribes of the United States have been on a peace footing.

The Indian To-day: The Past and Future of the First American · 第 2 / 11 章