CHAPTER V

CRUSTACEA (_CONTINUED_): MALACOSTRACA: LEPTOSTRACA—PHYLLOCARIDA:

EUMALACOSTRACA: SYNCARIDA—ANASPIDACEA: PERACARIDA—MYSIDACEA—CUMACEA—

ISOPODA—AMPHIPODA: HOPLOCARIDA—STOMATOPODA

SUB-CLASS II.—MALACOSTRACA.

The Malacostraca are generally large Crustacea, and they are

characterised by the presence of a definite and constant number of

segments composing the body. In addition to the paired eyes we can

distinguish two pairs of antennae, a mandibular segment, and two

maxillary segments composing the head region proper; there then follow

eight thoracic segments, the limbs belonging to the anterior thoracic

segments being often turned forwards towards the mouth, and modified in

structure to act as maxillipedes, while at any rate the last four are

used in locomotion and are termed “pereiopods.”[84] The abdomen is

composed of six segments, which typically carry as many pairs of

biramous “pleopods,” and the body terminates in a telson. Not counting

the paired eyes or the telson, there are present nineteen segments. The

excretory organs in the adult open at the bases of the second antennae,

and are known as “green glands,” but in the larva maxillary glands may

be present homologous to those which persist in the adult Entomostraca.

This is the typical arrangement, but sometimes the maxillary glands

persist in adult Malacostraca, _e.g._ _Nebalia_, _Anaspides_, and some

Isopods.

The hepato-pancreatic diverticula are directed posteriorly, and not

anteriorly as in most Entomostraca, and the stomach is often furnished

with chitinous teeth and ridges forming an elaborate gastric mill,

especially in the larger Decapods.

SERIES 1. LEPTOSTRACA.

=Division. Phyllocarida.=

[Illustration:

FIG. 76.—_Nebalia geoffroyi_, ♀, × 20. _A.1_, _A.2_, 1st and 2nd

antennae; _Ab.1_, _Ab.6_, 1st and 6th abdominal appendages; _A.G._

antennary gland; _C_, half of caudal fork; _E_, eye; _G_, ventral

ganglionic chain; _H_, heart; _I_, intestine; _L_, upper

liver-diverticulum; _M_, adductor muscle of halves of carapace;

_MX_, palp of 1st maxilla; _O_, ovary; _R_, rostrum. (After Claus.)

]

The small shrimp-like Crustacean _Nebalia_, which is found burrowing in

the superficial layers of sand in the littoral and sometimes the deeper

regions of most seas, has been regarded, ever since its anatomy was made

out by Claus,[85] as a connecting link between Entomostraca and

Malacostraca, and has been placed in a separate group Leptostraca.

The segmentation of the body is Malacostracan, save that two extra

segments are present in the abdomen, and the paired compound eyes are

borne upon stalks. The eight thoracic limbs are all very similar; they

are built on the typical biramous plan, and each carries a bract; they

have been compared, owing to their flattened, expanded shape, to the

foliaceous limbs of the Phyllopods. The abdominal appendages are also

biramous. The heart is greatly elongated, stretching through thorax and

abdomen; there are present both the antennary excretory glands

characteristic of adult Malacostraca and the maxillary glands

characteristic of adult Entomostraca, and both the posterior and

anterior livers characteristic of the two Orders respectively are

present. This combination of characters justifies the belief that

_Nebalia_ represents a primitive form, standing to some extent in an

intermediate position between Entomostraca and Malacostraca, but it may

be doubted if the special relationship to the Phyllopoda, claimed on the

strength of the foliaceous appearance of the thoracic limbs, can be

legitimately pressed.

_Nebalia_ shows the clearest signs of relationship to the other

primitive Malacostraca, and especially to the Mysidae, which it

resembles not only in general form and in the essentially biramous

character of its appendages, but also in many embryological points and

in the similarity in development of the brood-pouch.[86]

A large number of very ancient palaeozoic fossils are known which are

placed provisionally with _Nebalia_ in the Division Phyllocarida, and

some of these are no doubt closely related to the existing isolated

genus. _Hymenocaris_ from the Cambrian.

SERIES 2. EUMALACOSTRACA.

Before entering on a description of the members of this Series it is

necessary to introduce and justify a new scheme of classification which

has been proposed by Dr. W. T. Calman. This scheme necessitates the

abandonment of the old Order Schizopoda, and also ignores the

distinction which used to be considered fundamental between the

sessile-eyed Crustacea (Edriophthalmata) and the stalk-eyed forms

(Podophthalmata).

The old group of Schizopoda, to which _Nebalia_ and the isolated form

_Anaspides_, to be considered later, are undoubtedly related, represent

very clearly the stem-forms from which the various branches of the

Malacostracan stock diverge. No doubt they are themselves specialised in

many directions, since they are a dominant group in present day seas,

but their organisation is fundamentally of a primitive type. We see this

especially in the comparative absence of fusion or reduction of the

segments of the body externally and of the nervous system internally,

and in the simple undifferentiated character of the trunk-limbs, all of

which conform to the primitive biramous type. The most anterior thoracic

limbs of the Schizopods are of particular interest. In the higher

Malacostraca three of these limbs are usually turned forwards towards

the mouth to act as maxillipedes, and the most anterior of all, the

first maxillipede, is apt, especially in the Decapoda, to take on a

flattened foliaceous form owing to the expansion of the basal segments

to act as gnathobases (see Fig. 1, A, p. 10). Now this appendage in the

Schizopods preserves its typical biramous character, and resembles the

succeeding thoracic limbs, but in many of the species the basal joints

show a tendency to be produced into biting blades (Fig. 1, E, p. 10),

thus indicating the first step in the evolution of the foliaceous first

maxillipede of the Decapoda. The primitive character of the Schizopods

is also indicated by the fact that most of the Decapoda with uniramous

limbs on the five hinder thoracic segments pass through what is known as

the “Mysis stage” in development, when these limbs are biramous, the

exopodites being subsequently lost in most cases.

The “Schizopoda” include a very large number of pelagic Crustacea of

moderate size, which superficially appear to resemble one another very

closely. The slender, elongated body, the presence of biramous limbs on

all the thoracic and abdominal segments, and the possession of a single

row of gills at the bases of the thoracic limbs, are, generally

speaking, typical of the families Mysidae, Lophogastridae, Eucopiidae,

and Euphausiidae, which go to make up the old Order Schizopoda.

It has, however, been pointed out first by Boas,[87] and subsequently by

Hansen and Calman,[88] that the Euphausiidae are in many respects

distinct from the other three families, and agree with the Decapoda,

while the Eucopiidae, Lophogastridae, and Mysidae agree with the

Cumacea, Isopoda, and Amphipoda.

It has, therefore, been suggested by these authors that the

classification of the Malacostraca should be revised, and Calman (_loc.

cit._) has brought forward the following scheme:—

The division PERACARIDA, including the Eucopiidae, Lophogastridae, and

Mysidae (= Mysidacea), the Cumacea, Isopoda, and Amphipoda, is

characterised by the fact that when a carapace is present it leaves at

least four of the thoracic segments free and uncoalesced: by the

presence of a brood-pouch formed from the oostegites on the thoracic

limbs of the female: by the elongated heart: by the few and simple

hepatic caeca: by the filiform spermatozoa: and by the direct method of

development without a complicated larval metamorphosis. The biting face

of the mandible has a movable joint, the “lacinia mobilis.”[89]

The division EUCARIDA, on the other hand, including the Euphausiidae and

the Decapoda, shows the converse of these characters. The carapace

coalesces with all the thoracic segments, there is never a brood-pouch

formed from oostegites, the hepatic caeca are much ramified, the heart

is short, the spermatozoa are spherical with radiating pseudopodia, the

development is indirect with a complicated metamorphosis, and the

mandible is without a lacinia mobilis.

Corresponding divisions are made by Calman to receive the other

Malacostraca, namely, the PHYLLOCARIDA for _Nebalia_, the SYNCARIDA for

_Anaspides_, and the HOPLOCARIDA for the Stomatopoda or Squillidae.

The important array of characters which separates the Euphausiidae from

the other Schizopods and unites them with the Decapoda can no longer be

neglected, and the consideration of _Anaspides_ and its allies will

further emphasise the extreme difficulty of retaining the Schizopoda as

a natural group. In the sequel Calman’s proposed scheme will be adopted.

DIVISION 1. SYNCARIDA.

There is no carapace, and all the eight thoracic segments may be free

and distinct. Eyes may be pedunculate or sessile. The mandible is

without a lacinia mobilis. There is no brood-pouch, the eggs being

deposited and hidden after fertilisation. The spermatozoa are filiform,

the hepatic caeca very numerous, and the heart tubular and elongated,

with ostia only in one place in the anterior thoracic region. The

auditory organ is at the base of the first antennae.

=Order. Anaspidacea.=

=Fam. 1. Anaspididae.=—The mountain-shrimp of Tasmania, _Anaspides

tasmaniae_, was first described by Thomson[90] in 1893 from specimens

taken in a little pool near the summit of Mount Wellington; it was

redescribed by Calman,[91] who drew attention to its remarkable

resemblance to certain Carboniferous fossils of Europe and N. America

(_Gampsonyx_, _Palaeocaris_, etc.).

The creature appears to be confined to the deep pools of the rivers and

tarns on the mountains of the southern and western portions of

Tasmania.[92] The waters in which it occurs are always cold and

absolutely clear, and there is no record of its living at altitudes much

below 2000 feet, while it frequently occurs at 4000 feet. The body may

attain upwards of two inches in length; it is deeply pigmented with

black chromatophores, and it is held perfectly horizontal without any

flexure. The animal rarely swims unless disturbed, usually walking about

on stones and water-plants at the bottom of deep pools. In walking the

endopodites of the thoracic limbs are chiefly instrumental, but they are

assisted by the exopodites of the abdominal limbs.

When frightened the shrimp can dart rapidly forwards or sideways by the

strokes of its powerful tail-fan, but it never jumps backwards as do the

other Malacostraca. It appears to browse upon the algal slime covering

the rocks and on the submerged liver-worts and mosses, but it does not

refuse animal food, even feeding on the dead bodies of members of its

own species. The thoracic limbs, which are all biramous except the last

pair, carry a double series of remarkable plate-like gills on their

coxopodites. The slender and setose exopodites of the thoracic limbs are

respiratory in function, being kept in continual motion even when the

animal is at rest, and serving to keep up a current of fresh water round

the gills.

_Anaspides_ shows a remarkable combination of structural characters,

some of which are peculiar, while others are possessed in common with

the Peracarida or Eucarida. The chief peculiar characters are the entire

absence of a carapace, and the freedom of the eight thoracic segments,

with eight free thoracic ganglia in the nerve-cord; the peculiar double

series of plate-like gills; the structure of the alimentary canal; and

the fact that the eggs, instead of being carried in a brood-pouch, or

affixed to the abdominal limbs, are deposited under stones and among

water-plants.[93]

[Illustration:

FIG. 77.—_Anaspides tasmaniae_ in natural position for walking, × 1.

The last two pereiopods point backwards and are overlapped by the

first two pleopods.

]

The Peracaridan features, uniting it especially with the Mysidacea, are

the structure of the elongated heart, the filiform spermatozoa, and the

fact that no complicated metamorphosis is passed through, the young

hatching out in a condition similar to, though possibly not identical

with, the adult form.

The Eucaridan, especially Decapodan, features are the presence of an

auditory sac on the basal joint of the antennules, and the modification

of the endopodites of the first two abdominal appendages in the male to

form a copulatory organ.

A type of a new genus of this family was found by me in the littoral

zone of the Great Lake of Tasmania at an elevation of 3700 feet, and

named _Paranaspides lacustris_.

This little shrimp (Fig. 78), which does not appear to grow to more than

an inch in length, is totally different in appearance from _Anaspides_,

being pale green and transparent, with a very marked dorsal hump as in

_Mysis_, to which it bears a very striking superficial resemblance. It

leads a more active swimming life than _Anaspides_, and with this habit

is correlated the flexure of the body and the greater size of the

tail-fan and the scale of the second antenna. The mandible is peculiar

in being furnished with a four-jointed biramous palp, while that of

_Anaspides_ is three-jointed and uniramous, and the first thoracic

appendage is provided with a setose biting lobe on the antepenultimate

joint, thus more resembling a maxillipede. In other respects it agrees

essentially in structure with _Anaspides_.

[Illustration:

FIG. 78.—_Paranaspides lacustris_, × 4. _a^1_, _a^2_, First and second

antennae; _Ab.1_, first abdominal segment; _ep_, epipodites or gills

on the thoracic legs; _md_, mandible; _Pl.1_, first pleopod; _T_,

telson; _Th.8_, eighth free thoracic segment; _U_, uropod, or sixth

pleopod.

]

=Fam. 2. Koonungidae.=—The sole representative of this family, _Koonunga

cursor_, has been recently described by Mr. O. A. Sayce,[94] of

Melbourne University, from a small stream some miles to the west of

Melbourne. Although plainly belonging to the Anaspidacea, this

interesting little animal, which only measures a few millimetres in

length, and follows a similar habit to _Anaspides_, running about with

its body unflexed, differs from all the other members of the Division in

possessing sessile instead of stalked eyes, in the first thoracic

segment being fixed to the head, and in a number of minor anatomical

points.

It is impossible at present to assign the Carboniferous forms

(_Gampsonyx_, _Palaeocaris_, etc.) to their exact position in the

Division, but it seems that they agreed more closely with _Anaspides_

than with the other two genera. From the position in which the fossils

are preserved, it would appear that they followed a similar walking

habit to _Anaspides_, and that the body was unflexed.

DIVISION 2. PERACARIDA.

The carapace, when present, leaves at least four of the thoracic somites

distinct; the first thoracic segment is always fused with the head. The

eyes are pedunculate or sessile.

The mandible possesses a lacinia mobilis. A brood-pouch is formed in the

female from oostegites attached to the thoracic limbs. The hepatic caeca

are few and simple; the heart is elongated and tubular; the spermatozoa

are filiform, and development takes place without a complicated

metamorphosis.

=Order I. Mysidacea.=

The Mysidacea, although pelagic, are not very often met with in the true

plankton on the surface; they generally swim some way below the surface,

going down in many cases into the abysses. For this reason they thrive

excellently in aquaria, and the common _Mysis vulgaris_ is often present

in such numbers in the tanks at the Zoological station at Naples as to

damage the other inmates by the mere press of numbers. The Mysidacea,

like the majority of the Peracarida, undergo a direct development, and

hatch out with the structure of the adult fully formed.

Many of the Mysidacea bear auditory sacs upon the sixth pair of

pleopods, a characteristic not found in the Euphausiacea.

=Fam. 1. Eucopiidae.=—The curious form _Eucopia australis_ (Fig. 79)

described by Sars,[95] may be chosen as an example of the Mysidacea.

The peculiarity of this form consists chiefly in the immense elongation

of the endopodites of the fifth, sixth, and seventh thoracic appendages.

Characteristic of the Mysidacea is the freedom of the hinder thoracic

segments from fusion with the carapace, otherwise this animal is seen

closely to resemble the _Euphausia_ figured (Fig. 102). _Eucopia

australis_, like so many of the Mysidacea, is a deep-sea animal, being

brought up with the dredge from over 1000 fathoms; it is very widely

distributed over the Atlantic Ocean.

[Illustration:

FIG. 79.—_Eucopia australis_, young female, × 3. _A_, 1st antenna;

_Ab.1_, 1st abdominal segment; _Ab.6_, 6th abdominal appendage; _E_,

eye; _T_, telson; _Th_, 5th thoracic appendage. (After Sars.)

]

=Fam. 2. Lophogastridae.=—The members of this family (_Lophogaster_,

_Gnathophausia_) agree with the Eucopiidae in the possession of branched

gills on some of the thoracic limbs, in the absence of auditory sacs on

the sixth pair of pleopods, in the presence of normally developed

pleopods in both the male and female, and in the brood-lamellae being

developed on all seven of the thoracic limbs. The endopodites of the

posterior thoracic limbs are, however, of a normal size.

[Illustration:

FIG. 80.—Dorsal view of male _Diastylis stygia_, × 12. _A_, 2nd

antenna; _Ab.6_, 6th abdominal appendage. (After Sars.)

]

=Fam. 3. Mysidae.=—These differ from both the foregoing families in the

absence of gills, in the presence of an auditory sac on the sixth

pleopods, in the reduction of the other pleopods in the female, and in

the brood-lamellae being developed only on the more posterior pairs of

thoracic limbs. A number of closely related genera compose this family,

of which _Mysis_, _Boreomysis_, and _Siriella_ may be mentioned. _Mysis

oculata_, _var. relicta_, is a fresh-water form from the lakes of

northern and central Europe.

=Order II. Cumacea.=[96]

The Cumacea are a group of small marine animals rarely attaining an inch

in length, which agree with the Mysidacea in the characters noted above

as diagnostic of the Division Peracarida; they possess, however, in

addition a number of peculiar properties, and Sars believes them to be

of a primitive nature showing relationship to _Nebalia_, and possibly to

an ancestral Zoaea-like form. They follow a habit similar to that of the

Mysidacea, being caught either in the surface-plankton or in great

depths, many of the deep-sea forms being blind. They are, however, not

true plankton forms, and they appear to attain a greater development

both in point of variety and size in the seas of the northern

hemisphere. The thoracic limbs may be biramous, but there is a tendency

among many of the genera to lose the exopodites of some of the thoracic

legs, an exopodite never being present on the last few thoracic limbs of

the female and on the last in the male. In the Cumidae the four

posterior pairs in both sexes have no exopodites. The first three

thoracic appendages following the maxillae are distinguished as

maxillipedes; they are uniramous, and the first pair carries an

epipodite and a large gill upon the basal joints. Pleopods are only

developed in the male sex.

The flagellum of the second antennae in the male may be enormously

elongated, as in the Atlantic deep-sea species shown in Fig. 80, so as

to exceed in length the rest of the body.

=Fam. 1. Cumidae.=—No sharp demarcation between thorax and abdomen. Four

posterior pairs of legs in both sexes without exopodites. Male with five

well-developed pleopods in addition to the uropods. Telson wanting.

_Cuma_, _Cyclaspis_, etc.

=Fam. 2. Lampropidae.=—Body-form resembles that of Cumidae. All the

thoracic limbs except the last have exopodites. The male has three pairs

of pleopods. Telson present. _Lamprops_, _Platyaspis_, etc.

=Fam. 3. Leuconidae.=—Body-form similar to above. Male has only two

pairs of pleopods. Mouth-parts peculiar, much less setose than in other

families. Telson absent. _Leucon_, _Eudorella_.

=Fam. 4. Diastylidae.=—Anterior part of thorax sharply marked off from

posterior part. Male has two pairs of pleopods. Telson present.

_Diastylis_ (Fig. 80). _D. goodsiri_ from the Arctic ocean measures over

an inch in length.

=Fam. 5. Pseudocumidae.=—Rather similar to Diastylidae, but differ in

reduced size of telson and presence of exopodites on third and fourth

thoracic legs of female. This family is represented by three very

similar marine forms of the genus _Pseudocuma_; but, as Sars has

shown,[97] the Caspian Sea contains thirteen peculiar species, only one

of which can be referred to the genus _Pseudocuma_, while the rest may

be partitioned among four genera, _Pterocuma_, _Stenocuma_,

_Caspiocuma_, _Schizorhynchus_.

=Order III. Isopoda.=

The Isopoda and the Amphipoda are frequently classed together as

Arthrostraca or Edriophthalmata, owing to a number of features which

they share in common, as, for instance, the sessile eyes which

distinguish them from the podophthalmatous Schizopoda and Decapoda, the

absence of a carapace, and the thoracic limbs which are uniramous

throughout their whole existence. For the rest, in the presence of

brood-plates and the other diagnostic characters, they are plainly

allied to the other Peracarida, and an easy transition is effected from

the Mysidacea to the Isopoda through the Chelifera or Anisopoda. Only

one thoracic segment is usually fused with the head, the appendage of

this segment being the maxillipede; in the Chelifera among Isopoda, and

the Caprellidae among Amphipoda, two thoracic segments are fused with

the head.

The Isopoda are distinguished from the Amphipoda by the dorso-ventral

flattening of the body, as opposed to the lateral flattening in the

Amphipoda, by the posterior position of the heart, and by the branchial

organs being situated on the abdominal instead of on the thoracic limbs.

The Isopoda, following Sars’[98] classification, fall into six

sub-orders—the Chelifera, Flabellifera, Valvifera, Asellota, Oniscoida,

and Epicarida,—to which must be added the Phreatoicidea.

=Sub-Order 1. Chelifera.=

The Chelifera, including the families (1) =Apseudidae= and (2)

=Tanaidae=, are interesting in that they afford a transition between the

ordinary Isopods and the Mysidacea. The important features in which they

resemble the Mysidacea are, first, the fusion of the first two thoracic

segments with the head, with the coincident formation of a kind of

carapace in which the respiratory functions are discharged by a pair of

branchial lamellae attached to the maxillipedes; and, second, the

presence of very small exopodites on the first two thoracic appendages

of the Apseudidae.

The second pair of thoracic limbs, _i.e._ the pair behind the

maxillipedes, are developed both in the Apseudidae and Tanaidae into a

pair of powerful chelae, and these frequently show marked sexual

differences, being much more highly developed in the males than in the

females. The biramous and flattened pleopods are purely natatory in

function, and the uropods or pleopods of the sixth pair are terminal in

position and slender.

[Illustration:

FIG. 81.—_Apseudes spinosus_, ♂, × 15. _A_, 1st antenna; _Ab_, 6th

abdominal appendage; _T_, 2nd thoracic appendage. (After Sars.)

]

Both families, of which the Apseudidae contain the larger forms,

sometimes attaining to an inch in length, are littoral in habit, or

occur in sand and ooze at considerable depths, many of the genera being

blind. Many Tanaids (_e.g._ _Leptochelia_, _Tanais_, _Heterotanais_,

etc.) live in the algal growths of the littoral zone, and being highly

heliotropic they are easy to collect if a basinful of algae is placed in

a strong light. The females carry the eggs about with them in a

brood-pouch formed, as is usual in the Peracarida, by lamellae produced

from the bases of the thoracic limbs. The males on coming to maturity do

not appear to grow any more, or to take food, their mouth-parts

frequently degenerating and the alimentary canal being devoid of food.

They are thus in the position of insects which do not moult after coming

to maturity; and, as in Insects, the males are apt to show a kind of

high and low dimorphism—certain of the males being small with secondary

sexual characters little different from those of the females, while

others are large with these characters highly developed. Fritz Müller,

in his _Facts for Darwin_, observes that in a Brazilian species of

_Leptochelia_, apparently identical with the European _L. dubia_, the

males occur under two totally distinct forms—one in which the chelae are

greatly developed, and another in which the chelae resemble those of the

female, but the antennae in this form are provided with far longer and

more numerous sensory hairs than in the first form. Müller suggested

that these two varieties were produced by natural selection, the

characters of the one form compensating for the absence of the

characters of the other. A general consideration of the sexual

dimorphism in the Tanaidae[99] lends some support to this view, since

the smaller species with feeble chelae do appear to be compensated by a

greater development of sensory hairs on the antennae, but the specific

differences are so difficult to appreciate in the Tanaidae that it is

possible that the two forms of the male in Müller’s supposed single

species really belonged to two separate species.

=Sub-Order 2. Flabellifera.=

The Flabellifera include a number of rather heterogeneous families which

resemble one another, however, in the uropods being lateral and not

terminal, and being expanded together with the telson to form a caudal

fan for swimming. The pleopods are sometimes natatory and sometimes

branchial in function. Some of the families are parasitic or

semi-parasitic in habit.

=Fam. 1. Anthuridae.=—These are elongated cylindrical creatures found in

mud and among weeds upon the sea-bottom; their mouth-parts are evidently

intended for piercing and sucking, but whether they are parasitic at

certain periods on other animals is not exactly known. _Anthura_,

_Paranthura_, _Cruregens_.

[Illustration:

FIG. 82.—_Gnathia maxillaris_. =A=, Segmented larva, × 10; =B=,

Praniza larva, × 5; =C=, gravid female, × 5; =D=, male, × 5.

]

=Fam. 2. Gnathiidae.=[100]—These forms appear to be related to the

Anthuridae; they are ectoparasitic on various kinds of fish during

larval life, but on assuming the adult state they do not feed any more,

subsisting merely on the nourishment amassed during the larval periods.

The larvae themselves are continually leaving their hosts, and can be

taken in great numbers living freely among weeds on the sea-bottom. The

larvae, together with the adults of _Gnathia maxillaris_, are extremely

abundant among the roots of the sea-weed _Poseidonia cavolinii_ in the

Bay of Naples. The young larvae hatch out from the body of the female in

the state shown in Fig. 82, A. This minute larva fixes upon a fish, and

after a time it is transformed into the so-called Praniza larva (B), in

which the gut is so distended with the fluid sucked from the host that

the segmentation in the hind part of the thorax is entirely lost. When

this larva moults it may, however, reacquire temporarily its

segmentation. After a certain period of this parasitic mode of life the

Praniza finally abandons its host, and becomes transformed into the

adult male or female. This may take place at very different stages in

the growth of the larva, the range of variation in size of the adults

being 1–8 mm., and it must be remembered that when once the adult

condition is assumed growth entirely ceases. What it is that determines

the stage of growth in each individual when it shall be transformed into

the adult is not known. The males and females differ from one another so

extraordinarily that it was for long denied that they were both derived

from the Praniza larvae. This is nevertheless the case. The change from

the Praniza to the female (Fig. 82, C) is not very great. The ovary

absorbs all the nourishment in the gut and comes to occupy the whole of

the body, all the other organs degenerating, including the alimentary

canal and mouth-parts. Indeed, only the limbs with their muscles and the

nervous system remain. The change to the male (D) is more radical. The

food is here stored in the liver, which increases in the male just as

the ovary does in the female. The segmentation is reacquired, and the

massive square head is formed from the hinder part of the head in the

Praniza, the anterior portion with its stylet-like appendages being

thrown away. The powerful nippers of the male are not formed inside the

cases of the old styliform mandibles, but are independent and possibly

not homologous organs. The meaning of the marked sexual dimorphism and

the use of the males’ nippers are not in the least known, though the

animals are easy to keep under observation. In captivity the males never

take the slightest notice of either larval or adult females.

=Fam. 3. Cymothoidae.=[101]—This is a group of parasites more completely

parasitic than the foregoing, but their outer organisation does not

differ greatly from an ordinary Isopodan form. A great many very similar

species are known which infest the gill-chambers, mouths, and skin of

various fishes. The chief interest that attaches to them is found in the

fact that a number of them, and perhaps all, are hermaphrodite, each

individual acting as a male when free-swimming and young, and then

subsequently settling down and becoming female. This condition is

exactly the same as that occurring universally in the great group of

parasitic Isopoda, the Epicarida, to be considered later. There is no

evidence that the Cymothoidae are phyletically related to the Epicarida,

so that the similar sexual organisation appears to be due to convergence

resulting from similar conditions of life. The general question of

hermaphroditism in the Crustacea has been shortly discussed on pp.

105–106. _Cymothoa._

=Fam. 4. Cirolanidae.=—In this family is placed the largest Isopod

known—the deep-sea _Bathynomus giganteus_, found in the Gulf of Mexico

and the Indian Ocean, sometimes measuring a foot long by four inches

broad. A common small littoral form is _Cirolana_.

=Fam. 5. Serolidae.=[102]—The genus _Serolis_ comprises flattened forms

bearing a curious resemblance to Trilobites, which Milne Edwards

considered more than superficial. The genus is confined to the littoral

and deep waters of the southern hemisphere.

=Fam. 6. Sphaeromidae.=[103]—These are flattened, broad-bodied forms,

most commonly met with in the Mediterranean and warmer seas. Without

being actually parasitic, they are frequently found as scavengers in

decaying material, and they show some relationship to the parasitic

Cymothoidae. In some of the genera, _e.g._ _Cymodoce_, the ovigerous

female shows a degenerate condition of the mouth-parts, while the

maxillipedes undergo an enlargement, and are used for causing a current

through the brood-chamber.

=Sub-Order 3. Valvifera.=

[Illustration:

FIG. 83.—_Munnopsis typica_ (Munnopsidae), ♂, × 2. _A_, 2nd antenna;

_Ab_, abdomen; _T_, 5th thoracic appendage or 4th leg. (After Sars.)

]

The Valvifera, illustrated by the =Idotheidae= and =Arcturidae=, are

characterised by the uropods being turned back and expanded to form

folding doors covering up the delicate pleopods, which are mostly

respiratory in function, though the anterior pairs may serve as swimming

organs. _Arcturus_ is a typically deep sea genus, many species,

remarkably furnished with spiny processes, having been taken by the

_Challenger_ in the southern hemisphere. The Idotheidae are more

littoral forms, several species of _Idothea_ being commonly met with off

the British coasts, occasionally penetrating into brackish or even fresh

water.

=Sub-Order 4. Asellota.=

In this group the abdominal segments are fused dorsally to form a

shield-like caudal region; the pleopods are respiratory in function and

reduced in numbers, the first pair being often expanded and produced

backwards to form an operculum covering the rest. Several of the

Asellota are fresh-water, _Asellus aquaticus_ (=Asellidae=) being

extremely abundant all over Europe in weed-grown ditches, the mud of

slowly-moving streams, and even on the shores of large lakes. They are

mostly sluggish in habit, but the marine =Munnopsidae= (Fig. 83,

_Munnopsis_) are expert swimmers, the swimming organs being fashioned by

the expansion and elongation of the thoracic legs.

=Sub-Order 5. Oniscoida.=

The Oniscoida[104] are terrestrial forms in which the abdomen is fully

segmented, the pleopods are respiratory, their endopodites being

delicate branchiae, while their exopodites are plate-like and form

protective opercula for the gills, and the uropods are biramous and not

expanded. The epimera of the segments are greatly produced. The

terrestrial Isopods, although air-breathers,[105] are dependent on

moisture, and are only found in damp situations. It seems probable that

they have been derived from marine Isopods, since the more generalised

of them, _e.g._, _Ligia_ (Fig. 84), common on the English coasts, are

only found in damp caves and crannies in the rocks.

[Illustration:

FIG. 84.—_Ligia oceanica_, ventral and dorsal views, × 1. (From

original drawings prepared for Professor Weldon.)

]

The related _Ligidium_ is found far inland, but always in the

neighbourhood of water. These two genera may be distinguished by the

numerous joints in the flagellum of the second antennae, the flagellum

being in all cases the portion of the antenna succeeding the long fifth

joint. _Philoscia muscorum_ occurs usually near the coast, but it is

also found inland in England under trees in damp moss. This genus and

the common _Oniscus_, found in woods, are distinguished by the presence

of three joints in the flagellum of the second antenna. _Philoscia_ can

be distinguished from _Oniscus_ by its narrower body and the pretty

marbled appearance of its back. The genus _Trichoniscus_ has four joints

in the flagellum; various species are found in woods. In _Porcellio_ and

_Armadillidium_ there are only two joints in the flagellum, while

_Armadillidium_, the common garden wood-louse, can be distinguished from

all others by the flattened shape of the uropods, and the habit of

rolling up into a ball like an Armadillo.

There is also a very peculiar species, _Platyarthrus hoffmannseggii_,

which occurs in England and Northern Europe, and always lives in ants’

nests. It is supposed that they serve as scavengers for the ants, which

tend them carefully, and evidently treat them as domestic animals of

some kind. The small creature is quite white and blind, and has

exceedingly short antennae.

=Sub-Order 6. Epicarida.=

The Epicarida include an immense number of Isopods, parasitic upon other

Crustacea. In the adult state they become greatly deformed, and offer

very few characters of classificatory value, but they all pass through

certain highly characteristic larval stages which are essentially

similar in the different families. All the species are protandric

hermaphrodites, each individual being male while in a larval state, and

then losing its male organisation and becoming female as the parasitic

habit is assumed.

Two series of families are recognised according to the larval stages

passed through, the =Cryptoniscina=, in which the adult male

organisation is assumed in the Cryptoniscus stage, and the female

condition is imposed directly upon this form, and the =Bopyrina=, in

which the Cryptoniscus passes into a further larval stage, the Bopyrus,

which performs the function of the male, and upon which the female

organisation is imposed as the parasitic habit is assumed.

The following is a list of the Epicarida with the Crustacea which serve

as their hosts[106]:—

Cryptoniscina │Microniscidae │on Copepoda.

„ │Cryptoniscidae │on Ostracoda.

„ │Liriopsidae │on Rhizocephala.

„ │Hemioniscidae │on Cirripedia.

„ │Cabiropsidae │on Isopoda.

„ │Podasconidae │on Amphipoda.

„ │Asconiscidae │on Schizopoda.

Bopyrina │Dajidae │on Decapoda

„ │Phryxidae │ „

„ │Bopyridae │ „

„ │Entoniscidae │ „

[Illustration:

FIG. 85.—Epicaridian larva, probably belonging to one of the

Cryptoniscina. _A_, 2nd antenna; _Ab_, abdominal appendages; _T_,

thoracic appendages. (From Bonnier, after Hansen.)

]

In all cases the first larval form which hatches out from the maternal

brood-pouch is called the Epicaridian larva (Fig. 85).

This little larva has two pairs of antennae, a pair of curious frontal

processes, and a pair of mandibles. The other mouth-parts are missing;

there are only six thoracic limbs, but the full complement of six

biramous pleopods are present, and at the end of the body there may be a

long tube of unknown function.

As a type of the =Cryptoniscina= we may take the =Liriopsidae=,[107]

parasitic on the Rhizocephala, which are, of course, themselves

parasitic on the Decapoda, the whole association forming a very

remarkable study in Carcinology.

Almost every species of the Rhizocephala is subject to the attacks of

Liriopsids, the latter fixing either on the Rhizocephala themselves, or

else on the Decapod host at a point near the fixation of the

Rhizocephalous parasite. An exceedingly common Liriopsid is _Danalia

curvata_, parasitic on _Sacculina neglecta_, which is itself parasitic

on the spider-crab, _Inachus mauritanicus_, at Naples. The adult

_Danalia_ is a mere curved bag full of eggs or developing embryos, and

without any other recognisable organs except two pairs of spermathecae

upon the ventral surface where the spermatozoa derived from the larval

males are stored.

[Illustration:

FIG. 86.—_Inachus mauritanicus_, ♀, × 1, carrying two _Sacculina

neglecta_ (_a_, _b_), and a _Danalia curvata_ (_c_), the latter

bearing two dwarf males.

]

In Fig. 86 is represented a female of _Inachus mauritanicus_ which

carried upon it two Sacculinae and a _Danalia curvata_, and upon the

latter are seen two minute larval males in the act of fertilising the

adult _Danalia_. The eggs develop into the Epicaridian stage, after

which the larva passes into the Cryptoniscus stage (Fig. 87). In this

larval form the segments are clearly delimited; the only mouth-parts

present are the mandibles, but there are seven pairs of thoracic limbs

and the full number of pleopods. This Cryptoniscus stage is found in all

the Epicarida, and only differs in detail in the various families.

[Illustration:

FIG. 87.—Ventral view of Cryptoniscus larva of _Danalia curvata_, ♂, ×

25.

]

In the Cryptoniscina the Cryptoniscus larva is the male, and at this

stage possesses a pair of large testes in the thorax. The ovaries are

also present at this stage as very small bodies applied to the anterior

ends of the testes. The larval males in this state seek out adult fixed

Danaliae and fertilise them; and, when this is accomplished, they

themselves become fixed to the host and begin to develop into the adult

female condition. The limbs are all lost, and out of the mouth grows a

long proboscis (Fig. 88, _P_), which penetrates the tissues of the host.

The ovaries begin to grow, and a remarkable process of absorption in the

testes takes place. These organs, when fixation occurs, are never empty

of spermatozoa, and are frequently crammed with them. After fixation

some large cells at the interior borders of the testes begin to feed

upon the remains of these organs and to grow enormously in size and to

multiply by amitosis. These phagocytes, as they really are, attain an

enormous size, but they are doomed to degeneration, the chromatin

becoming dispersed through the cytoplasm, and the nuclei dividing first

by amitosis and then breaking up and disappearing. As the parasite

grows, the heart at the posterior end of the body ceases to beat; the

ovaries increase enormously at the expense of the alimentary canal, and

on the ventral surface two pairs of spermathecae are invaginated ready

to receive the spermatozoa of a larval male. In the adult condition,

after fertilisation has taken place and the ovaries occupy almost the

whole of the body, the remains of the phagocytic cells can be seen on

the dorsal surface in a degenerate state. They evidently are not used as

food, and their sole function is to make away with the male organisation

when it has become useless.[108]

[Illustration:

FIG. 88.—Side view of _Danalia curvata_, × 15, shortly after fixation

and loss of larval appendages. _A_, Alimentary canal; _E_, eye; _H_,

heart; _N_, phagocytic cells; _O_, ovary; _P_, proboscis.

]

[Illustration:

FIG. 89.—Optical section (dorsal view) of _Danalia curvata_, in the

same stage as Fig. 88. _A_, Alimentary canal; _Ec_, ectoderm; _H_,

heart; _N_, phagocytic cells; _O_, ovaries; _P_, proboscis.

]

In the series =Bopyrina=, after the free-living Epicaridian and

Cryptoniscus stages, a further larval state is assumed, called the

Bopyrus, which is the functional male, and, after performing this

function, passes on to the adult female condition.

The family =Bopyridae= is parasitic in the branchial chamber of

Decapoda, especially Macrura and Anomura. When one of these Decapods is

infested with an adult Bopyrid the gill-chamber in which it is situated

is greatly swollen, as shown in Fig. 90. A very common Bopyrid is

_Bopyrus fougerouxi_, parasitic in the gill-chambers of _Palaemon

serratus_. The _Bopyrus_ larva or functional male has the appearance

shown in Fig. 91. It differs from the Cryptoniscus stage in possessing a

rudimentary pair of anterior thoracic limbs and seven pairs normally

developed, while the abdominal limbs are plate-like and branchial in

function. The male can often be found attached to the female beneath the

last pair of incubatory lamellae.

[Illustration:

FIG. 90.—_Galathea intermedia_, with a _Pleurocrypta microbranchiata_

under its left branchiostegite (_B_), × 1. (After Sars.)

]

[Illustration:

FIG. 91.—Ventral view of male _Bopyrus fougerouxi_, × 30. _A_, 1st and

2nd antennae; _T_, 8th (last) thoracic appendage. (After Bonnier.)

]

The adult female condition, which is assumed after the Bopyrid stage is

passed through, is illustrated in Fig. 92. The body acquires a

remarkable asymmetry, due to the unequal pressure exerted by the walls

of the gill-chamber. The antennae and mandibles (Fig. 92, B) are

entirely covered up by the largely expanded maxillipedes; maxillae are,

as usual, entirely absent. Very large lamellae grow out from the bases

of the thoracic limbs to form a brood-pouch, and in this manner the

adult condition is attained.

The final complication in the life-histories of these Isopoda is reached

by the family =Entoniscidae=, which are parasitic when adult inside the

thoracic cavity of Brachyura and Paguridae. The cephalothorax of a

_Carcinus maenas_, which contains an adult _Portunion maenadis_ (_P_),

is shown in Fig. 93. The parasite is of a reddish colour when alive.

[Illustration:

FIG. 92.—_Bopyrus fougerouxi._ =A=, Ventral view of female carrying a

male (_M_) between her abdominal appendages, × 8; =B=, ventral view

of part of head of female, the maxillipedes and the left mandible

having been removed. _A.1_, _A.2_, 1st and 2nd antennae; _M_, male;

_Mn_, right mandible; _Mx_, left maxillipede; _O_, oostegite; _T_,

left 4th thoracic appendage or 3rd leg. (After Bonnier.)

]

[Illustration:

FIG. 93.—Cephalothorax of _Carcinus maenas_, seen from the ventral

side, containing a parasitic _Portunion maenadis_ (_P_), × ½. (After

Bonnier.)

]

The Entoniscidae pass through a free living Epicaridian and Cryptoniscus

stage, and become adult males in the Bopyrus stage. It is stated,

however, by Giard and Bonnier[109] that these individuals, which

actually function as males, never grow up into adult females, though all

the adult females have passed through a male stage in which the male

genital ducts are not formed. The hermaphroditism, therefore, in these

animals at any rate is absolutely useless from a reproductive point of

view, and this justifies our looking for some other explanation of it,

such as was suggested on p. 105.

[Illustration:

FIG. 94.—_Portunion maenadis_, ♀:—=A=, Young, × 10; =B=, older, × 5;

=C=, adult, before the eggs are laid, × 3. _A_, 2nd antenna; _Ab_,

abdomen; _B_, anterior lobe of brood-pouch; _B′_, its lateral lobe;

_H_, head; 1, 2, 1st and 2nd incubatory lamellae (oostegites).

(After Giard and Bonnier.)

]

The Bopyrus fixes in the gill-chamber of the host and becomes converted

into the adult female by a series of transformations. As these changes

take place it invaginates the wall of the gill-chamber and pushes its

way into the thoracic cavity of the crab, though it lies all the time

enveloped in the invaginated wall of the gill-chamber, and not free in

the body-cavity of the crab. The transformations which it undergoes are

shown in Fig. 94. The body first assumes a grub-like appearance (A), and

two pairs of incubatory lamellae (1, 2) grow out from the first and

second thoracic segments. In the next stage (B) these lamellae assume

gigantic proportions, and four pairs of branchiae grow out from the

abdominal segments (_Ab_). In the final stage (C) the incubatory

lamellae have further increased in size, and constitute the main bulk of

the body; the enormous mass of eggs is passed into the incubatory pouch,

and all that remains of the rest of the body is the small head (H) and

the abdomen (_Ab_), furnished with its branchiae. Communication with the

external world is kept up through an aperture which leads from the

brood-pouch into the gill-chamber of the host, and through this aperture

the young are hatched out when they are developed sufficiently.

The presence of these parasites, although they are never in actual

contact with the internal organs of the crab, calls forth the same

phenomenon of parasitic castration as was observed in the Rhizocephala.

A remarkable association is also found to exist between the Entoniscidae

and Rhizocephala, of such a kind that, on the whole, a crab infested

with a Rhizocephalan is more likely to harbour an Entoniscid than one

without. The explanation of this association is probably that a crab

with a _Sacculina_ inside it is prevented from moulting as often as an

uninfected crab, and, in consequence, the larval stages of the

Entoniscid in the crab’s gill-chamber are more safely passed through.

=Sub-Order 7. Phreatoicidea.=[110]

The members of this sub-order, although agreeing with the Isopoda in the

essentials of their anatomy, resemble the Amphipoda in being rather

laterally compressed, and in having the hand of the first free thoracic

limb enlarged and subchelate. The abdomen is greatly produced laterally

by expansions of the segments. In fact, the shape of the body and of the

limbs is very Amphipodan.—_Phreatoicus_ from New Zealand, Southern

Australia, and Tasmania. _Phreatoicopsis_,[111] a very large form from

Gippsland, Victoria. Only one family exists, =Phreatoicidae=.

=Order IV. Amphipoda.=

In this order the body is flattened laterally, the heart is anterior in

position, and the branchial organs are attached to the thoracic limbs.

There are three well defined sub-orders, (i.) the Crevettina, including

a vast assemblage of very similar animals, of which the common

_Gammarus_ and _Orchestia_ may serve as examples; (ii.) the Laemodipoda

or Caprellids, and (iii.) the Hyperina.

We cannot do more than touch on the organisation of these sub-orders.

=Sub-Order 1. Crevettina.=

In this sub-order only one thoracic segment is fused with the head; the

basal joints of the thoracic limbs are expanded to form broad lateral

plates, and the abdomen is well developed, with six pairs of pleopods,

the last three pairs being always turned backwards, and stiffened to act

as uropods.

This group has numerous fresh-water representatives, _e.g._ _Gammarus_

of several species, the blind well-shrimp _Niphargus_, and the S.

American _Hyalella_; but the vast majority of the species are marine,

and are found especially in the littoral zone wherever the rocks are

covered with a rich growth of algae, Polyzoa, etc. The Talitridae or

“Sand-hoppers” have deserted the waters and live entirely in the sand

and under rocks on the shore, and one common European species,

_Orchestia gammarellus_, penetrates far inland, and may be found in

gardens where the soil is moist many miles from the sea.

The Rev. T. R. R. Stebbing, in his standard work[112] on this group,

recognises forty-one families, and more than 1000 species, so that we

can only mention a few of the families, many of which, indeed, differ

from one another in small characters.

=Fam. Lysianassidae.=—The first joint of the first antenna is short,

with an accessory flagellum. Mandible with a palp, and with an almost

smooth cutting edge. The third joint of the second gnathopod is

elongated. This family is entirely marine, comprising forty-eight

genera, with species distributed in all seas. One genus,

_Pseudalibrotus_, inhabits the brackish water of the Caspian Sea.

_Lysianassa_ has several common British and Mediterranean species.

=Fam. Haustoriidae.=—The members of this family are specially adapted

for burrowing, the joints of the hinder thoracic limbs being expanded,

and furnished with spines for digging. Some of the species are common on

the British coasts, _e.g._ _Haustorius arenarius_. _Pontoporeia_ has an

interesting distribution, one species, _P. femorata_, being entirely

marine, in the Arctic and North Atlantic, _P. affinis_ inhabiting the

Atlantic, and also fresh-water lakes in Europe and North America, _P.

microphthalma_ being confined to the Caspian Sea, and _P. loyi_ to Lakes

Superior and Michigan.

=Fam. Gammaridae.=—Includes fifty-two genera. The first antennae are

slender, with the accessory flagellum very variable. The mandibles have

a dentate cutting edge, spine-row, and molar surface, and a

three-jointed palp. The first two thoracic limbs are subchelate. This

family includes a few marine, but mostly brackish and fresh-water

species. _Crangonyx_ is entirely subterranean in habitat, as is

_Niphargus_, _N. forelii_ occurring, however, in the deep waters of Lake

Geneva. Both these genera are blind. _Gammarus_ has thirty species, _G.

locusta_ being the common species on the North Atlantic coasts, and _G.

pulex_ the common fresh-water species of streams and lakes in Europe. A

number of Gammaridae inhabit the Caspian Sea, _e.g._ _Boeckia_,

_Gmelina_, _Niphargoides_, etc., while the enormous Gammarid fauna of

Lake Baikal, constituting numerous genera, showing a great variety of

structure, some of them being blind, belong to this family, _e.g._

_Macrohectopus_ (_Constantia_), _Acanthogammarus_, _Heterogammarus_,

etc.

[Illustration:

FIG. 95.—_Gammarus locusta_, ♂ (above) and ♀ (below), × 4. _Abd.1_,

First abdominal segment; _T_, telson; _Th_, seventh free thoracic

segment (= 8th thoracic segment); _U_, third uropod. (After Della

Valle.)

]

=Fam. Talitridae.=—This family may be distinguished by the absence of a

palp on the mandible, and by one ramus of the uropods being very small

or wanting. The various kinds of “Sand-hoppers” belong here, familiar

creatures on every sandy coast between tide-marks. The genera _Talitrus_

and _Talorchestia_ always frequent sand, while _Orchestia_ is generally

found under stones and among weed. Some species of _Orchestia_, e.g. _O.

gammarellus_, live inland in moist places at some distance from the sea;

one species of _Talitrus_ (_T. sylvaticus_) occurs at great elevations

in forests in Southern Australia.

_Hyale_ is a coastal genus, and is also found on floating objects in the

Sargasso Sea. _Hyalella_ is confined to Lake Titicaca and the fresh

waters of South America. _Chiltonia_ from S. Australasia.

=Fam. Corophiidae.=—The members of this family have a rather flattened

body and small abdomen, and the side-plates on the thorax are small. The

uropods are also small and weak. Some species of the genus _Corophium_

are characteristic of the Caspian Sea.

=Sub-Order 2. Laemodipoda.=

[Illustration:

FIG. 96.—_Caprella grandimana_, × 4. _a_, Abdomen; _g_, gills; _t_,

3rd (first free) thoracic segment; _t′_, 8th thoracic segment.

(After P. Mayer.)

]

=Fam. 1. Caprellidae=[113] are also chiefly littoral forms, swarming

among rocks covered by algae, though they are by no means so easy to

detect as the Gammaridae and Tanaidae which haunt similar situations. In

a basinful of algae or Polyzoa taken from the rocks fringing the Bay of

Naples, the latter are easily collected, the Tanaidae always crawling

out of the weeds in the direction of the light, while the Gammarids dart

about in all directions; but the Caprellidae, with their branching

stick-like forms, harmonise so well with their surroundings that it

requires an experienced eye to detect them. The body is elongated and

thin, resembling that of a stick-insect. The first two thoracic segments

are more or less completely fused with the head; the second and third

thoracic limbs end in claws; the two following thoracic limbs are normal

in the genus _Proto_, rudimentary in _Protella_, and absent in the

remaining genera, though their gills remain as conspicuous flabellate

structures. The three hind legs are normal, and the abdomen is reduced

to a tiny wart at the hind end of the greatly elongated thorax.

P. Mayer has described cases of external hermaphroditism as being fairly

common in certain species, _e.g._ _Caprella acutifrons_, and this is

interesting if we take into consideration the frequent partial

hermaphroditism exhibited by the gonad of _Orchestia_ at certain times

of year (see p. 104).

=Fam. 2. Cyamidae.=—These are closely related to the Caprellidae in the

form of the limbs and the reduced state of the abdomen. _Cyamus ceti_,

which lives ectoparasitically on the skin of whales, has the body

expanded laterally instead of being elongated, as in the Caprellids.

=Sub-Order 3. Hyperina.=

[Illustration:

FIG. 97.—_Phronima sedentaria_, ♀, in a _Pyrosoma_ colony, × 1. (After

Claus, from Gerstaecker and Ortmann.)

]

These are an equally distinct and curious group of Amphipods,

characterised by the large size of the head and the transparency of the

body. Instead of haunting the littoral zone they are pelagic in habit,

and many of them live inside transparent pelagic Molluscs, Tunicates, or

Jellyfish. A well known form is _Phronima sedentaria_, which inhabits

the glassy barrel-like cases of the Tunicate _Pyrosoma_ in the

Mediterranean. The female is often taken in the plankton together with

her brood in one of these curious glass houses; the zooids of the

_Pyrosoma_ colony are completely eaten away and the external surface of

the case, instead of being rough with the tentacles of the zooids, is

worn to a smooth, glass-like surface. It has been observed that the

female actively navigates her house upon the surface of the sea; she

clings on with her thoracic legs inside, while the abdomen is pushed out

through an opening of the _Pyrosoma_ case behind, and by its alternate

flexion and extension drives the boat forwards, the water being thus

made to enter at the front aperture and supply the female and her brood

with nourishment.

DIVISION 3. HOPLOCARIDA.

The carapace leaves at least four of the thoracic somites distinct. The

eyes are pedunculate. The mandibles are without a lacinia mobilis; there

are no oostegites, the eggs being carried in a chamber formed by the

maxillipedes. The hepatic caeca are much ramified, the heart is greatly

elongated, stretching through thorax and abdomen, with a pair of ostia

in each segment. The spermatozoa are spherical, and there is a

complicated and peculiar metamorphosis.

=Order. Stomatopoda.=

[Illustration:

FIG. 98.—Lateral view of _Squilla_ sp., × 1. _A.1_, _A.2_, 1st and 2nd

antennae; _Ab.1_, 1st abdominal segment; _Ab.6_, 6th abdominal

appendage; _C_, cephalothorax, consisting of the head fused with the

first five thoracic segments; _E_, eye; _M_, 2nd maxillipede; _T_,

telson. (After Gerstaecker and Ortmann.)

]

The Stomatopoda are rather large animals, occasionally reaching a foot

in length, all of which exhibit a very similar structure; _Squilla

mantis_ and _S. desmaresti_ are found on the south coast of England not

very frequently; but they are very common in the Mediterranean, living

in holes or in the sand within the littoral zone of shallow water. They

differ from all the other Malacostraca by a combination of characters,

and Calman proposes the term HOPLOCARIDA for a division equivalent to

the Peracarida, Eucarida, etc.

The abdomen is very broad and well developed, ending in a widely

expanded telson. There is a carapace which covers the four anterior

thoracic segments, leaving the four posterior segments free. The portion

of the head carrying the stalked eyes constitutes an apparently separate

segment articulated to the head. The antennae, mandibles, and maxillae

are normal; there then follow five pairs of uniramous thoracic limbs

turned forwards as maxillipedes and ending in claws; the second pair of

these is modified into a huge raptorial arm, exactly resembling that of

a Praying _Mantis_ (cf. vol. v. p. 242), by means of which the _Squilla_

seizes its prey. The last three thoracic limbs are small and biramous.

The pleopods are powerful, flattened, biramous swimming organs with

small hooks or “retinaculae” upon their endopodites, which link together

each member of a pair in the middle, and with large branching gills upon

the exopodites.

The internal anatomy exhibits several primitive features. The nervous

system is not at all concentrated, there being a separate ganglion for

each segment; and the heart stretches right through thorax and abdomen,

with a pair of ostia in each segment. There are also ten hepatic

diverticula given off segmentally from the intestine.

The female has the curious habit of carrying the developing eggs in a

chamber improvised by the apposition of the maxillipedes, so that it

looks rather as if she were in the act of devouring her own brood.

The metamorphosis of the larvae, despite the work of Claus[114] and

Brooks,[115] is not very accurately known, especially uncertain being

the identification of the different larvae with their adult forms. The

chief interest consists in the fact that certain of the anterior

thoracic limbs develop in their normal order and degenerate, to be

reformed later, just as in the Phyllosoma larva of the Loricata (see pp.

165, 166).

In one series of larvae, probably not of _Squilla_ itself, but of

related genera, the young hatch out as “Erichthoidina” (Fig. 99), with

the thoracic appendages developed as biramous organs as far as the fifth

pair, and with a single abdominal pair of limbs.

[Illustration:

FIG. 99.—Erichthoidina larva of a Stomatopod, with five pairs of

maxillipedes, and the first pair of abdominal appendages, × 10.

(From Balfour, after Claus.)

]

The abdominal series of limbs is next completed; the second thoracic

limb assumes its adult raptorial structure, but the succeeding three

limbs become greatly reduced and may entirely degenerate, leaving the

posterior six thoracic segments without limbs.

Usually the anterior three pairs are only reduced, and then redevelop

side by side with the small posterior limbs as they appear. This larva

is then termed the “Erichthus” (Fig. 100); but when they completely

disappear the larva is called a “Pseudozoaea,” owing to its resemblance

to the Zoaea stage of the Decapoda, which is also characterised by the

suppressed development of the thoracic segments.

[Illustration:

FIG. 100.—Older Erichthus larva, with six pairs of abdominal

appendages, × 15. (From Balfour, after Claus.)

]

The so-called “Alima” larva of _Squilla_ is also a Pseudozoaea, but it

is apparently arrived at directly without the previous formation and

degeneration of the anterior thoracic limbs, the larva hatching out from

the egg in the Pseudozoaeal stage.

=Fam. Squillidae.=—Of the six known genera none extend into the cold

subarctic seas; the majority are characteristic of the warm or tropical

seas (_Gonodactylus_), some of the species having very wide ranges,

_e.g._ _G. chiragra_, which is completely circumtropical, and appears to

have entered the Mediterranean at some period, though it is very rare

there.

The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 04 (of 10) · 第 5 / 22 章