CHAPTER II

SELECTION OF STORIES TO TELL

There is one picture which I can always review, in my own collection of

past scenes, though many a more highly coloured one has been irrevocably

curtained by the folds of forgetfulness. It is the picture of a little

girl, standing by an old-fashioned marble-topped dressing-table in a pink,

sunny room. I can never see the little girl's face, because, somehow, I am

always looking down at her short skirts or twisting my head round against

the hand which patiently combs her stubborn curls. But I can see the

brushes and combs on the marble table quite plainly, and the pinker

streaks of sun on the pink walls. And I can hear. I can hear a low,

wonder-working voice which goes smoothly on and on, as the fingers run up

the little girl's locks or stroke the hair into place on her forehead. The

voice says, "And little Goldilocks came to a little bit of a house. And

she opened the door and went in. It was the house where three Bears lived;

there was a great Bear, a little Bear, and a middle-sized Bear; and they

had gone out for a walk. Goldilocks went in, and she saw"--the little

girl is very still; she would not disturb that story by so much as a loud

breath; but presently the comb comes to a tangle, pulls,--and the little

girl begins to squirm. Instantly the voice becomes impressive, mysterious:

"she went up to the table, and there were _three plates of porridge_. She

tasted the first one"--the little girl swallows the breath she was going

to whimper with, and waits--"and it was too hot! She tasted the next one,

and _that_ was too hot. Then she tasted the little bit of a plate, and

that--was--just--right!"

How I remember the delightful sense of achievement which stole into the

little girl's veins when the voice behind her said "just right." I think

she always chuckled a little, and hugged her stomach. So the story

progressed, and the little girl got through her toilet without crying,

owing to the wonder-working voice and its marvellous adaptation of

climaxes to emergencies. Nine times out of ten, it was the story of _The

Three Bears_ she demanded when, with the appearance of brush and comb, the

voice asked, "Which story shall mother tell?"

It was a memory of the little girl in the pink room which made it easy for

me to understand some other children's preferences when I recently had

occasion to inquire about them. By asking many individual children which

story of all they had heard they liked best, by taking votes on the best

story of a series, after telling it, and by getting some obliging teachers

to put similar questions to their pupils, I found three prime favourites

common to a great many children of about the kindergarten age. They were

_The Three Bears_, _Three Little Pigs_, and _The Little Pig that wouldn't

go over the Stile_.

Some of the teachers were genuinely disturbed because the few stories they

had introduced merely for amusement had taken so pre-eminent a place in

the children's affection over those which had been given seriously. It was

of no use, however, to suggest substitutes. The children knew definitely

what they liked, and though they accepted the recapitulation of scientific

and moral stories with polite approbation, they returned to the original

answer at a repetition of the question.

Inasmuch as the slightest of the things we hope to do for children by

means of stories is quite impossible unless the children enjoy the

stories, it may be worth our while to consider seriously these three which

they surely do enjoy, to see what common qualities are in them,

explanatory of their popularity, by which we may test the probable success

of other stories we wish to tell.

Here they are,--three prime favourites of proved standing.

THE STORY OF THE THREE LITTLE PIGS[1]

[Footnote 1: Adapted from Joseph Jacobs's _English Fairy Tales_ (David

Nutt, 57-59 Long Acre, W.C. 6s.).]

Once upon a time there were three little pigs, who went from home to seek

their fortune. The first that went off met a man with a bundle of straw,

and said to him:--

"Good man, give me that straw to build me a house."

The man gave the straw, and the little pig built his house with it.

Presently came along a wolf, and knocked at the door, and said:--

"Little pig, little pig, let me come in."

But the pig answered:--

"No, no, by the hair of my chiny-chin-chin."

So the wolf said:--

"Then I'll huff, and I'll puff, and I'll blow your house in."

So he huffed, and he puffed, and he blew his house in, and ate up the

little pig.

The second little pig met a man with a bundle of furze, and said:--

"Good man, give me that furze to build me a house."

The man gave the furze, and the pig built his house. Then once more came

the wolf, and said:

"Little pig, little pig, let me come in."

"No, no, by the hair of my chiny-chin-chin."

"Then I'll puff, and I'll huff, and I'll blow your house in."

So he huffed, and he puffed, and he puffed and he huffed, and at last he

blew the house in, and ate up the little pig.

The third little pig met a man with a load of bricks, and said:--

"Good man, give me those bricks to build me a house with."

The man gave the bricks, and he built his house with them. Again the wolf

came, and said:--

"Little pig, little pig, let me come in."

"No, no, by the hair of my chiny-chin-chin."

"Then I'll huff, and I'll puff, and I'll blow your house in."

So he huffed, and he puffed, and he huffed, and he puffed, and he puffed

and huffed; but he could not get the house down. Finding that he could

not, with all his huffing and puffing, blow the house down, he said:--

"Little pig, I know where there is a nice field of turnips."

"Where?" said the little pig.

"Oh, in Mr Smith's field, and if you will be ready to-morrow morning we

will go together, and get some for dinner."

"Very well," said the little pig. "What time do you mean to go?"

"Oh, at six o'clock."

So the little pig got up at five, and got the turnips before the wolf

came crying:--

"Little pig, are you ready?"

The little pig said: "Ready! I have been and come back again, and got a

nice potful for dinner."

The wolf felt very angry at this, but thought that he would be a match for

the little pig somehow or other, so he said:--

"Little pig, I know where there is a nice apple-tree."

"Where?" said the pig.

"Down at Merry-garden," replied the wolf, "and if you will not deceive me

I will come for you, at five o'clock to-morrow, and get some apples."

The little pig got up next morning at four o'clock, and went off for the

apples, hoping to get back before the wolf came; but it took long to climb

the tree, and just as he was coming down from it, he saw the wolf coming.

When the wolf came up he said:--

"Little pig, what! are you here before me? Are they nice apples?"

"Yes, very," said the little pig. "I will throw you down one."

And he threw it so far that, while the wolf was gone to pick it up, the

little pig jumped down and ran home. The next day the wolf came again, and

said to the little pig:--

"Little pig, there is a fair in town this afternoon; will you go?"

"Oh yes," said the pig, "I will go; what time?"

"At three," said the wolf. As usual the little pig went off before the

time, and got to the fair, and bought a butter-churn, which he was rolling

home when he saw the wolf coming. So he got into the churn to hide, and in

so doing turned it round, and it rolled down the hill with the pig in it,

which frightened the wolf so much that he ran home without going to the

fair. He went to the little pig's house, and told him how frightened he

had been by a great round thing which came past him down the hill. Then

the little pig said:--

"Ha! ha! I frightened you, then!"

Then the wolf was very angry indeed, and tried to get down the chimney in

order to eat up the little pig. When the little pig saw what he was about,

he put a pot full of water on the blazing fire, and, just as the wolf was

coming down, he took off the cover, and in fell the wolf. Quickly the

little pig clapped on the cover, and when the wolf was boiled ate him for

supper.

THE STORY OF THE THREE BEARS[1]

[Footnote 1: Adapted from Joseph Jacobs's _English Fairy Tales_ (David

Nutt, 57-59 Long Acre, W.C. 6s.).]

Once upon a time there were Three Bears, who lived together in a house of

their own, in a wood. One of them was a Little Small Wee Bear, and one

was a Middle-sized Bear, and the other was a Great Huge Bear. They had

each a pot for their porridge,--a little pot for the Little Small Wee

Bear, and a middle-sized pot for the Middle-sized Bear, and a great pot

for the Great Huge Bear. And they had each a chair to sit in,--a little

chair for the Little Small Wee Bear, and a middle-sized chair for the

Middle-sized Bear, and a great chair for the Great Huge Bear. And they had

each a bed to sleep in,--a little bed for the Little Small Wee Bear, and a

middle-sized bed for the Middle-sized Bear, and a great bed for the Great

Huge Bear.

One day, after they had made the porridge for their breakfast, and poured

it into their porridge-pots, they walked out into the wood while the

porridge was cooling, that they might not burn their mouths, by beginning

too soon to eat it. And while they were walking, a little girl named

Goldilocks came to the house. She had never seen the little house before,

and it was such a strange little house that she forgot all the things her

mother had told her about being polite: first she looked in at the window,

and then she peeped in at the keyhole; and seeing nobody in the house, she

lifted the latch. The door was not fastened, because the Bears were good

Bears, who did nobody any harm, and never suspected that anybody would

harm them. So Goldilocks opened the door, and went in; and well pleased

she was when she saw the porridge on the table. If Goldilocks had

remembered what her mother had told her, she would have waited till the

Bears came home, and then, perhaps, they would have asked her to

breakfast; for they were good Bears--a little rough, as the manner of

Bears is, but for all that very good-natured and hospitable. But

Goldilocks forgot, and set about helping herself.

So first she tasted the porridge of the Great Huge Bear, and that was too

hot. And then she tasted the porridge of the Middle-sized Bear, and that

was too cold. And then she went to the porridge of the Little Small Wee

Bear, and tasted that: and that was neither too hot nor too cold, but just

right; and she liked it so well, that she ate it all up.

Then Goldilocks sat down in the chair of the Great Huge Bear, and that was

too hard for her. And then she sat down in the chair of the Middle-sized

Bear, and that was too soft for her. And then she sat down in the chair of

the Little Small Wee Bear, and that was neither too hard nor too soft, but

just right. So she seated herself in it, and there she sat till the bottom

of the chair came out, and down she came, plump upon the ground.

Then Goldilocks went upstairs into the bed-chamber in which the Three

Bears slept. And first she lay down upon the bed of the Great Huge Bear;

but that was too high at the head for her. And next she lay down upon the

bed of the Middle-sized Bear, and that was too high at the foot for her.

And then she lay down upon the bed of the Little Small Wee Bear; and that

was neither too high at the head nor at the foot, but just right. So she

covered herself up comfortably, and lay there till she fell fast asleep.

By this time the Three Bears thought their porridge would be cool enough;

so they came home to breakfast. Now Goldilocks had left the spoon of the

Great Huge Bear standing in his porridge.

"SOMEBODY HAS BEEN AT MY PORRIDGE!" said the Great Huge Bear, in his

great, rough, gruff voice. And when the Middle-sized Bear looked at his,

he saw that the spoon was standing in it too.

"SOMEBODY HAS BEEN AT MY PORRIDGE!" said the Middle-sized Bear, in his

middle-sized voice.

Then the Little Small Wee Bear looked at his, and there was the spoon in

the porridge-pot, but the porridge was all gone.

"SOMEBODY HAS BEEN AT MY PORRIDGE, AND HAS EATEN IT ALL UP!" said the

Little Small Wee Bear, in his little, small, wee voice.

Upon this, the Three Bears, seeing that someone had entered their house,

and eaten up the Little Small Wee Bear's breakfast, began to look about

them. Now Goldilocks had not put the hard cushion straight when she rose

from the chair of the Great Huge Bear.

"SOMEBODY HAS BEEN SITTING IN MY CHAIR!" said the Great Huge Bear, in his

great, rough, gruff voice.

And Goldilocks had crushed down the soft cushion of the Middle-sized Bear.

"SOMEBODY HAS BEEN SITTING IN MY CHAIR!" said the Middle-sized Bear, in

his middle-sized voice.

And you know what Goldilocks had done to the third chair.

"SOMEBODY HAS BEEN SITTING IN MY CHAIR AND HAS SAT THE BOTTOM OUT OF IT!"

said the Little Small Wee Bear, in his little, small, wee voice.

Then the Three Bears thought it necessary that they should make further

search; so they went upstairs into their bed-chamber. Now Goldilocks had

pulled the pillow of the Great Huge Bear out of its place.

"SOMEBODY HAS BEEN LYING IN MY BED!" said the Great Huge Bear, in his

great, rough, gruff voice.

And Goldilocks had pulled the bolster of the Middle-sized Bear out of its

place.

"SOMEBODY HAS BEEN LYING IN MY BED!" said the Middle-sized Bear, in his

middle-sized voice.

And when the Little Small Wee Bear came to look at his bed, there was the

bolster in its place; and the pillow in its place upon the bolster; and

upon the pillow was the shining, yellow hair of little Goldilocks!

"SOMEBODY HAS BEEN LYING IN MY BED,--AND HERE SHE IS!" said the Little

Small Wee Bear, in his little, small, wee voice.

Goldilocks had heard in her sleep the great, rough, gruff voice of the

Great Huge Bear; but she was so fast asleep that it was no more to her

than the roaring of wind or the rumbling of thunder. And she had heard the

middle-sized voice of the Middle-sized Bear, but it was only as if she had

heard someone speaking in a dream. But when she heard the little, small,

wee voice of the Little Small Wee Bear, it was so sharp, and so shrill,

that it awakened her at once. Up she started, and when she saw the Three

Bears on one side of the bed, she tumbled herself out at the other, and

ran to the window. Now the window was open, because the Bears, like good,

tidy Bears as they were, always opened their bed-chamber window when they

got up in the morning.

Out little Goldilocks jumped, and ran away home to her mother, as fast as

ever she could.

THE OLD WOMAN AND HER PIG[1]

[Footnote 1: Adapted from Joseph Jacobs's _English Fairy Tales_ (David

Nutt, 57-59 Long Acre, W.C. 6s.).]

It happened one day that as an old woman was sweeping her house she found

a little crooked sixpence. "What," said she, "shall I do with this little

sixpence? I will go to market, and buy a little pig."

On the way home she came to a stile; but the piggy wouldn't go over the

stile.

So she left the piggy and went on a little further, till she met a dog.

She said to him, "Dog, dog, bite pig; piggy won't go over the stile; and I

sha'n't get home to-night." But the dog wouldn't bite piggy.

A little further on she met a stick. So she said: "Stick! stick! beat dog!

dog won't bite pig; piggy won't go over the stile; and I sha'n't get home

to-night." But the stick wouldn't beat the dog.

A little further on she met a fire. So she said: "Fire! fire! burn stick!

stick won't beat dog; dog won't bite pig; piggy won't get over the stile;

and I sha'n't get home to-night." But the fire wouldn't burn the stick.

A little further on she met some water. So she said: "Water! water! quench

fire; fire won't burn stick; stick won't beat dog; dog won't bite pig;

piggy won't get over the stile; and I sha'n't get home to-night." But the

water wouldn't quench the fire.

A little further on she met an ox. So she said: "Ox! ox! drink water;

water won't quench fire; fire won't burn stick; stick won't beat dog; dog

won't bite pig; piggy won't get over the stile; and I sha'n't get home

to-night." But the ox wouldn't drink the water.

A little further on she met a butcher. So she said: "Butcher! butcher!

kill ox; ox won't drink water; water won't quench fire; fire won't burn

stick; stick won't beat dog; dog won't bite pig; piggy won't get over the

stile; and I sha'n't get home to-night." But the butcher wouldn't kill the

ox.

A little further on she met a rope. So she said: "Rope! rope! hang

butcher; butcher won't kill ox; ox won't drink water; water won't quench

fire; fire won't burn stick; stick won't beat dog; dog won't bite pig;

piggy won't get over the stile; and I sha'n't get home to-night." But the

rope wouldn't hang the butcher.

A little further on she met a rat. So she said: "Rat! rat! gnaw rope; rope

won't hang butcher; butcher won't kill ox; ox won't drink water; water

won't quench fire; fire won't burn stick; stick won't beat dog; dog won't

bite pig; piggy won't get over the stile; and I sha'n't get home

to-night." But the rat wouldn't gnaw the rope.

A little further on she met a cat. So she said: "Cat! cat! kill rat; rat

won't gnaw rope; rope won't hang butcher; butcher won't kill ox; ox won't

drink water; water won't quench fire; fire won't burn stick; stick won't

beat dog; dog won't bite pig; piggy won't get over the stile; and I

sha'n't get home to-night." But the cat said to her, "If you will go to

yonder cow, and fetch me a saucer of milk, I will kill the rat." So away

went the old woman to the cow.

But the cow refused to give the milk unless the old woman first gave her a

handful of hay. So away went the old woman to the haystack; and she

brought the hay to the cow.

When the cow had eaten the hay, she gave the old woman the milk; and away

she went with it in a saucer to the cat.

As soon as it had lapped up the milk, the cat began to kill the rat; the

rat began to gnaw the rope; the rope began to hang the butcher; the

butcher began to kill the ox; the ox began to drink the water; the water

began to quench the fire; the fire began to burn the stick; the stick

began to beat the dog; the dog began to bite the pig; the little pig in a

fright jumped over the stile; and so the old woman did get home that

night.

* * * * *

The briefest examination of these three stories reveals the fact that one

attribute is beyond dispute in each. Something happens, all the time.

Every step in each story is an event. There is no time spent in

explanation, description, or telling how people felt; the stories tell

what people did, and what they said. And the events are the links of a

sequence of the closest kind; in point of time and of cause they follow as

immediately as it is possible for events to follow. There are no gaps, and

no complications of plot requiring a return on the road.

A second common characteristic appears on briefest examination. As you run

over the little stories you will see that each event presents a distinct

picture to the imagination, and that these pictures are made out of very

simple elements. The elements are either familiar to the child or

analogous to familiar ones. Each object and happening is very like

everyday, yet touched with a subtle difference, rich in mystery. For

example, the details of the pictures in the Goldilocks story are parts of

everyday life,--house, chairs, beds, and so on; but they are the house,

chairs, and beds of three bears; that is the touch of marvel which

transforms the scene. The old woman who owned the obstinate pig is the

centre of a circle in which stand only familiar images,--stick, fire,

water, cow, and the rest; but the wonder enters with the fact that these

usually inanimate or dumb objects of nature enter so humanly into the

contest of wills. So it is, also, with the doings of the three little

pigs. Every image is explicable to the youngest hearer, while none

suggests actual familiarity, because the actors are not children, but

pigs. Simplicity, with mystery, is the keynote of all the pictures, and

these are clear and distinct.

Still a third characteristic common to the stories quoted is a certain

amount of repetition. It is more definite, and of what has been called the

"cumulative" kind, in the story of the old woman; but in all it is a

distinctive feature.

Here we have, then, three marked characteristics common to three stories

almost invariably loved by children,--action, in close sequence; familiar

images, tinged with mystery; some degree of repetition.

It is not hard to see why these qualities appeal to a child. The first is

the prime characteristic of all good stories,--"stories as is stories";

the child's demand for it but bears witness to the fact that his

instinctive taste is often better than the taste he later develops under

artificial culture. The second is a matter of common-sense. How could the

imagination create new worlds, save out of the material of the old? To

offer strange images is to confuse the mind and dull the interest; to

offer familiar ones "with a difference" is to pique the interest and

engage the mind.

The charm of repetition, to children, is a more complex matter; there are

undoubtedly a good many elements entering into it, hard to trace in

analysis. But one or two of the more obvious may be seized and brought to

view. The first is the subtle flattery of an unexpected sense of mastery.

When the child-mind, following with toilful alertness a new train of

thought, comes suddenly on a familiar epithet or expression, I fancy it is

with much the same sense of satisfaction that we older people feel when in

the midst of a long programme of new music the orchestra strikes into

something we have heard before,--Handel, maybe, or one of the more

familiar Beethoven sonatas. "I know that! I have heard that before!" we

think, triumphant, and settle down to enjoyment without effort. So it is,

probably, with the "middle-sized" articles of the bears' house and the

"and I sha'n't get home to-night" of the old woman. Each recurrence

deepens the note of familiarity, tickles the primitive sense of humour,

and eases the strain of attention.

When the repetition is cumulative, like the extreme instance of _The House

that Jack Built_, I have a notion that the joy of the child is the

pleasure of intellectual gymnastics, not too hard for fun, but not too

easy for excitement. There is a deal of fun to be got out of purely

intellectual processes, and childhood is not too soon for the rudiments

of such fun to show. The delight the healthy adult mind takes in working

out a neat problem in geometry, the pleasure a musician finds in following

the involutions of a fugue, are of the same type of satisfaction as the

liking of children for cumulative stories. Complexity and mass, arrived at

by stages perfectly intelligible in themselves, mounting steadily from a

starting-point of simplicity; then the same complexity and mass resolving

itself as it were miraculously back into simplicity, this is an

intellectual joy. It does not differ materially, whether found in the

study of counterpoint, at thirty, or in the story of the old woman and her

pig, at five. It is perfectly natural and wholesome, and it may perhaps be

a more powerful developing force for the budding intellect than we are

aware.

For these reasons let me urge you, when you are looking for stories to

tell little children, to apply this threefold test as a kind of touchstone

to their quality of fitness: Are they full of action, in close natural

sequence? Are their images simple without being humdrum? Are they

repetitive? The last quality is not an absolute requisite; but it is at

least very often an attribute of a good child-story.

Having this touchstone in mind for general selection, we can now pass to

the matter of specific choices for different ages of children. No one can

speak with absolute conviction in this matter, so greatly do the taste and

capacity of children of the same age vary. Any approach to an exact

classification of juvenile books according to their suitability for

different ages will be found impossible. The same book in the hands of a

skilful narrator may be made to afford delight to children both of five

and ten. The following are merely the inferences drawn from my own

experience. They must be modified by each teacher according to the

conditions of her small audience. In general, I believe it to be wise to

plan the choice of stories much as indicated in the table given on page 64.

At a later stage, varying with the standard of capacity of different

classes, we find the temper of mind which asks continually, "Is that

true?" To meet this demand, one draws on historical and scientific

anecdote, and on reminiscence. But the demand is never so exclusive that

fictitious narrative need be cast aside. All that is necessary is to state

frankly that the story you are telling is "just a story," or--if it be the

case--that it is "part true and part story."

At all stages I would urge the telling of Bible stories, as far as is

allowed by the special circumstances of the school. These are stories

from a source unsurpassed in our literature for purity of style and

loftiness of subject. More especially I urge the telling of the

Christ-story, in such parts as seem likely to be within the grasp of the

several classes. In all Bible stories it is well to keep as near as

possible to the original unimprovable text.[1] Some amplification can be

made, but no excessive modernising or simplifying is excusable in face of

the austere grace and majestic simplicity of the original. Such adaptation

as helps to cut the long narrative into separate units, making each an

intelligible story, I have ventured to illustrate according to my own

personal taste, in two stories given in Chapter VI. The object of the

usual modernising or enlarging of the text may be far better attained for

the child listener by infusing into the text as it stands a strong

realising sense of its meaning and vitality, letting it give its own

message through a fit medium of expression.

[Footnote 1: _Stories from the Old Testament_, by S. Platt, retells the

Old Testament story as nearly as possible in the actual words of the

Authorised Version.]

The stories given in pages 133 to 246 are grouped as illustrations of the

types suitable for different stages. They are, however, very often

interchangeable; and many stories can be told successfully to all classes.

A vitally good story is little limited in its appeal. It is,

nevertheless, a help to have certain plain results of experience as a

basis for choice; that which is given is intended only for such a basis,

not in the least as a final list.

CERTAIN TYPES OF STORY CLASSIFIED

FOR KINDERGARTEN AND CLASS I.:

Little Rhymed Stories

(including the best of the nursery rhymes and the

more poetic fragments of Mother Goose)

Stories with Rhyme in Parts

Nature Stories

(in which the element of personification is strong)

Nonsense Tales

Wonder Tales

FOR CLASSES II. AND III.:

Nonsense Tales

Wonder Tales

Fairy and Folk Tales

Fables

Legends

Nature Stories

(especially stories of animals)

FOR CLASSES IV. AND V.:

Folk Tales

Fables

Myths and Allegories

Developed Animal Stories

Legends: Historic and Heroic

Historical Stories

Humorous Adventure Stories

"True Stories"

The wonder tales most familiar and accessible to the teacher are probably

those included in the collections of Andersen and the Brothers Grimm. So

constant is the demand for these that the following list may be found

useful, as indicating which of the stories are more easily and effectively

adapted for telling, and commonly most successful.

It must be remembered that many of these standard tales need such adapting

as has been suggested, cutting them down, and ridding them of vulgar or

sophisticated detail.

From the Brothers Grimm:

The Star Dollars

The Cat and the Mouse

The Nail

The Hare and the Hedgehog

Snow-White and Rose-Red

Mother Holle

Thumbling

Three Brothers

The Little Porridge Pot

Little Snow-White

The Wolf and the Seven Little Kids

The Sea Mouse

From Andersen:

Little Tiny

The Lark and the Daisy

The Ugly Duckling

The Seven Stories of the Snow Queen

The Flax

The Little Match Girl

The Fir-Tree

The Red Shoes

Olé Luköié

Monday

Saturday

Sunday

The Elf of the Rose

Five Peas in a Pod

The Portuguese Duck

The Little Mermaid (much shortened)

The Nightingale (shortened)

The Girl who trod on a Loaf

The Emperor's New Clothes

Another familiar and easily attainable type of story is the classic myth,

as retold in Kupfer's _Legends of Greece and Rome_.[1] Of these, again,

certain tales are more successfully adapted to children than others. Among

the best for telling are:

Arachne

Pandora

Midas

Apollo and Daphne

Apollo and Hyacinthus

Narcissus

Latona and the Rustics

Proserpine

[Footnote 1: A well-nigh indispensable book for teachers is Guerber's

_Myths of Greece and Rome_, which contains in brief form a complete

collection of the classic myths.]

How to Tell Stories to Children, and Some Stories to Tell · 第 2 / 6 章