SECT. 5 (1782-3-4-)

“CECILIA”: A PAEAN OF PRAISE: LAMENTATIONS.

[“This is the last visit remembered, or, at least, narrated,

of Streatham.” With these words Madame D'Arblay concludes

the account given in the “Memoirs of Dr. Burney,” of her

meeting with General Paoli. In the autumn Of 1782 Mrs.

Thrale went, with her daughters and Dr. Johnson, to

Brighthelmstone, where Fanny joined them. On their return

to London, November 20, the Thrales settled for the winter

in Argyle-street, and Fanny repaired to her father's

residence in St. Martin's Street. She saw much of Mrs.

Thrale during the winter, but in the following April that

lady quitted London for Bath, where she resided until her

marriage with Signor Piozzi in the summer of 1784. She

maintained an affectionate correspondence with Fanny until

after the marriage, but from the date of their parting in

London, they saw no more of each other, except for one brief

interval in May, 1784, for several years.

We must here give an account, as concise as possible, of the

transaction which was so bitterly resented by the friends of

Mrs. Thrale, but in which her conduct seems to us, taking

all the circumstances fairly into consideration, to have

been less deserving of condemnation than their

uncharitableness. She had first seen Piozzi, an Italian

singer, at a party at Dr. Burney's in 1777, and her

behaviour to him on that occasion had certainly afforded no

premonition of her subsequent infatuation. Piozzi, who was

nearly of the same age as herself, was, as Miss Seward

describes him, “a handsome man, with gentle, pleasing,

unaffected manners, and with very eminent skill in his

profession.” He was requested by Dr. Burney to sing; rather

unfortunately, it would appear, for the company, which

included Johnson and the Grevilles, was by no means composed

of musical enthusiasts, and Mrs. Thrale, in particular,

“knew not a flat from a sharp, nor a crotchet from a

quaver.” However, he complied; and Mrs. Thrale, after

sitting awhile in silence, finding the proceedings dull, was

seized with a desire to enliven them. “In a fit of utter

recklessness, she suddenly, but softly, arose, and stealing

on tiptoe behind Signor Piozzi, who was accompanying himself

on the pianoforte to an animated aria parlante, with his

back to the company and his face to the wall, she

ludicrously began imitating him by squaring her elbows,

elevating them with ecstatic shrugs of the shoulders, and

casting up her eyes, while languishingly reclining her head;

as if she were not less enthusiastically, though somewhat

more suddenly, struck with the transports of harmony than

himself.

“But the amusement which such an unlooked-for exhibition--

caused to the party, was momentary; for Dr. Burney, shocked

lest the poor signor should observe, and be hurt by this

mimicry, glided gently round to Mrs. Thrale, and, with

something between pleasantry and severity, whispered to her,

'Because, madam, you have no ear yourself for music, will

you destroy the attention of all who, in that one point, are

otherwise gifted?'”[153]

This deserved rebuke the lively lady took in perfectly good

part, and the incident passed without further notice. She

does not appear to have met with Piozzi again, Until, in

July, 1780, she picked him up at Brighton. She now

finds him “amazingly like her father,” and insists that he

shall teach Hester music. From this point the fever

gradually increased. In August, 1781, little more than four

months after her husband's death, Piozzi has become “a

prodigious favourite” with her; she has even developed a

taste for his music, which “fills the mind with emotions one

would not be without, though inconvenient enough sometimes.”

In the spring Of 1783, soon after her arrival at Bath, they

were formally engaged, but the urgent remonstrances of her

friends and family caused the engagement to be broken off,

and Piozzi went to Italy. Her infatuation, however, was too

strong to be overcome. Under the struggle, long protracted,

her health gave way, and at length, by the advice of her

doctor, and with the sullen consent of Miss Thrale, Piozzi

was summoned to Bath. He, too, had been faithful, and he

lost no time in obeying the summons. They were married,

according to the Roman Catholic rites, in London, and again,

on the 25th of July, 1784, in a Protestant church at Bath,

her three elder daughters, of whom the eldest, Hester

(“Queeny”), was not yet twenty years of age, having quitted

Bath before his arrival.

Mrs. Piozzi left England with her husband and her youngest

daughter, Cecilia, and lived for some years in Italy, where

she compiled her well known “Anecdotes of Dr. Johnson.” Her

wedded life with Piozzi was certainly happy, and he gave her

no reason to repent the step she had taken. The indignation

of her former friends, especially of Dr. Johnson, was

carried to a length which, the cause being considered,

appears little short of ridiculous. Mrs. Thrale's second

marriage may have been ill-advised, but it was neither

criminal nor disgraceful. Piozzi was incontestably a

respectable man and a constant lover; but that an Italian

musician, who depended upon his talents for his livelihood,

should become the husband of the celebrated Mrs. Thrale, and

the stepfather of four young ladies of fashion, the

daughters of a brewer, and the heiresses to his large

fortune,--there was the rub! The dislike of Dr. Johnson and

his friends to the marriage was, from a worldly point of

view, justifiable enough, but it argues ill for their

generosity of mind that they should have attached such

overwhelming importance to such petty considerations. Mrs.

Piozzi has been blamed for deserting her three elder

daughters; but the fact is, it was her daughters who

deserted her, and refused to recognise her husband. Her

only fault, if fault it can be called, was in declining to

sacrifice the whole happiness of her life to the supposed

requirements of their rank in society. In condemning her

friends for their severity and illiberality, we must,

however, make an exception in favour of Fanny. She, like

the rest, had been averse to the match, but her cordiality

to Mrs. Piozzi remained undiminished; and when, soon after

the marriage, their correspondence was discontinued, to be

renewed only after the lapse of many years, it was not

Fanny, but Mrs. Piozzi, who broke it off, instigated, Fanny

always believed, by her husband.

Her separation from Mrs. Thrale was not the only event which

brought sorrow to Fanny during the years to which the

following section of the Diary relates. Mr. Crisp, the

person dearest to her of all human beings outside her own

family, died at Chesington, of an attack of his old malady,

the gout, on the 24th of April, 1783, aged seventy-five.

Fanny and Susan were with him at the last, and Fanny's love

was rewarded, her anguish soothed yet deepened, when, almost

with his dying breath, her Daddy Crisp called her “the

dearest thing to him on earth.”

Towards the end of 1784 another heavy blow fell upon Fanny,

in the loss of Dr. Johnson, who died on the 13th of

December. The touching references in the Diary to his last

illness form an interesting supplement to Boswell's

narrative.

But the picture of Fanny's life during these years is not

without bright touches. As such we may reckon the great,

and deserved success of her novel, “Cecilia”; the

commencement of her acquaintance with two ladies who were

hereafter to be numbered among her dearest friends--the

venerable Mrs. Delany, and Mrs. Locke, of Norbury Park,

Surrey; and last, not least, the growing intimacy between

Edmund Burke and the family of Dr. Burney.--ED.]

AT BRIGHTON AGAIN, THE “FAmous Miss BURNEY.”

Brighthelmstone, Oct. 26.

My journey was incidentless---but the moment I came into Brighthelmstone

I was met by Mrs. Thrale, who had most eagerly been waiting for me a

long while, and therefore I dismounted, and walked home with her. It

would be very superfluous to tell you how she received me, for you

cannot but know, from her impatient letters, what I had reason to expect

of kindness and welcome.

Dr. Johnson received me, too, with his usual goodness, and with a salute

so loud, that the two young beaus, Cotton and Swinerton, have never done

laughing about it.

Mrs. Thrale spent two or three hours in my room, talking over all

her affairs, and then we wished each other bon repos, and--retired.

Grandissima conclusion!

Oh, but let me not forget that a fine note came from Mr. Pepys, who is

here with his family, saying he was pressde de vivre, and entreating

to see Mrs. and Miss T., Dr. Johnson, and Cecilia at his house the next

day. I hate mightily this method of naming me from my heroines, of whose

honour I think I am more jealous than of my own.

_Oct. 27_--The Pepyses came to visit me in form, but I was dressing;

in the evening, however, Mrs. and Miss T. took me to them. Dr. Johnson

would not go; he told me it was my day, and I should be crowned, for Mr.

Pepys was wild about “Cecilia.” We found at Mr. Pepys' nobody but his

wife, his brother, Dr. Pepys,[154] and Dr. Pepys' lady, Countess of

Rothes. Mr. Pepys received me with such distinction, that it was very

evident how much the book, with the most flattering opinion of it, was

in his head; however, he behaved very prettily, and only mentioned it

by allusions; most particularly upon the character of Meadows, which he

took various opportunities of pronouncing to be the “best hit possible”

upon the present race of fine gentlemen. We did not stay with them long,

but called upon Miss Benson, and proceeded to the rooms. Mr. Pepys was

very unwilling to part with us, and wanted to frighten me from going, by

saying,--

“And has Miss Burney the courage to venture to the Rooms? I wonder she

dares!”

I did not seem to understand him, though to mistake him was impossible.

However, I thought of him again when I was at the rooms, for most

violent was the staring and whispering as I passed and repassed!

insomuch that I shall by no means be in any haste to go again to them.

Susan and Sophy Thrale, who were with their aunt, Mrs. Scott, told

Queeny upon our return that they heard nothing said, whichever way

they turned, but “That's she!” “That's the famous Miss Burney!” I shall

certainly escape going any more, if it is in my power.

_Monday, Oct. 28._--Mr. Pepys had but just left me, when Mrs. Thrale

sent Susan with a particular request to see me in her dressing-room,

where I found her with a milliner.

“Oh, Miss Burney,” she cried, “I could not help promising Mrs. Cockran

that she should have a sight of you--she has begged it so hard.”

You may believe I stared; and the woman, whose eyes almost looked ready

to eat me, eagerly came up to me, exclaiming,--

“Oh, ma'am, you don't know what a favour this is to see you! I have

longed for it so long! It is quite a comfort to me, indeed. Oh, ma'am,

how clever you must be! All the ladies I deal with are quite distracted

about 'Cecilia,'--and I got it myself. Oh, ma'am, how sensible you must

be! It does my heart good to see you.”

The Diary and Letters of Madame D'Arblay — Volume 1 · 第 124 / 284 题