If I had been experienced, I should have remarked the mother, but in

fact I barely remember her, though I spoke with her one day. She was

somewhat heavy and grave, I think, downcast and yet watchful. She did

her business efficiently, without enthusiasm, and did not enter into

general conversation with her customers. Her husband did that part of

the business. Marks was a merry Jew. I bought oranges of her once for

the sake of hearing her speak, and while she was serving me the child

came into the shop and stood by her. She leaned against her rather

than stood, took the woman's disengaged arm and put it round her neck.

Looks passed between them; the mother's sharply down, the child's

searchingly up. On either side there was pain, as if each tried to

read the other.

I was very shy with strangers. The more I wanted to get on terms with

them the less I was able to do it. I asked the child whether she liked

oranges.

I asked the child, but the mother answered me, measuring her words.

"She likes nothing of ours. It's we that like and she that takes."

That was her reply.

"I am sure that she likes you at any rate," I said. Her hold on the

child tightened, as if to prevent an escape.

"She should, since I bore her. But she has much to forgive me."

Such a word left me dumb. I was not then able to meet women on such

terms. Nor did I then understand her as I do now.

Here is another case. There was a slatternly young woman whom I

caught, or who caught me, unawares; who suddenly threw open the

windows and showed me things I had never dreamed.

Opposite the chambers in R---- Buildings where I worked, or was

intended to work, and across a wall, there was a row of tenements

called, if I remember, Gaylord's Rents. Part mews, part warehouses,

and all disreputable, the upper story of it, as it showed itself to me

over the wall, held some of the frowsiest of London's horde. Exactly

before my eyes was one of the lowest of these hovels, the upper part

of a stable, I imagine, since it had, instead of a window, a door, of

which half was always shut and half always open, so that light might

get in or the tenants lean out to take the air.

Here, and so leaning her bare elbows, I saw on most days of the week a

slim young woman airing herself--a pale-faced, curling-papered,

half-bodiced, unwashed drab of a girl, who would have had shame

written across her for any one to read if she had not seemed of all

women I have ever seen the least shamefaced. Her brows were as

unwritten as a child's, her smile as pure as a seraph's, and her eyes

blue, unfaltering and candid. She laughed a greeting, exchanged

gossip, did her sewing, watched events, as the case might be, was not

conscious of her servitude or anxious to market it. Sometimes she

shared her outlook with an old woman--a horrible, greasy go-between,

with straggling grey hair and a gin-inflamed face. She chatted with

this beldame happily, she cupped her vile old dewlap, or stroked her

dishonourable head; sometimes a man in shirt sleeves was with her,

treated her familiarly, with rude embraces, with kisses, nudges and

leers. She accepted all with good-humour and, really, complete good

breeding. She invited nothing, provoked nothing, but resented nothing.

It seemed to me as if all these things were indeed nothing to her;

that she hardly knew that they were done; as if her soul could render

them at their proper worth, transmute them, sherd them off, discard

them. It was, then, her surface which took them; what her soul

received was a distillation, an essence.

Then one night I had all made plain. She entranced me on a summer

night of stillness, under a full yellow moon. I was working late, till

past ten, past eleven o'clock, and looking out of my open window

suddenly was aware of her at hers. The shutter was down, both wings of

it, and she stood hovering, seen at full length, above the street.

She! Could this be she? It was so indeed--but she was transfigured,

illuminated from within; she rayed forth light. The moon shone full

upon her, and revealed her pure form from head to foot swathed in

filmy blue--a pale green-blue, the colour of ocean water seen from

below. Translucent webbery, whatever it was, it showed her beneath it

as bare as Venus was when she fared forth unblemished from the sea.

Her pale yellow hair was coiled above her head; her face looked mild

and radiant with a health few Londoners know. Her head was bent in a

considering way; she stood as one who is about to plunge into deep

water, and stands hesitating at the shock. Once or twice she turned

her face up, to bathe it in the light. I saw that in it which in human

faces I had never seen--communion with things hidden from men, secret

knowledge shared with secret beings, assurance of power above our

hopes.

Breathless I watched her, the drab of my daily observation, radiant

now; then as I watched she stretched out her arms and bent them

together like a shield so that her burning face was hidden from me,

and without falter or fury launched herself into the air, and dropt

slowly down out of my sight.

Exactly so she did it. As we may see a pigeon or chough high on the

verge of a sea-cliff float out into the blue leagues of the air, and

drift motionless and light--or descend to the sea less by gravity than

at will--so did she. There was nothing premeditated, there was nothing

determined on: mood was immediately translated into ability--she was

at will lighter or heavier than the air. It was so done that here was

no shock at all--she in herself foreshadowed the power she had.

Rather, it would have been strange to me if, irradiated, transplendent

as she was, she had not considered her freedom and on the instant

indulged it. I accepted her upon her face value without question--I

did not run out to spy upon her. _Ecce unus fortior me!_

In this case, being still new to the life into which I was gradually

being drawn, it did not for one moment occur to me to start an

adventure of my own. I might have accosted the woman, who was, as the

saying goes, anybody's familiar; or I might have spied for another

excursion of her spirit, and, with all preparation made, have followed

her. But I did neither of these things at the time. I saw her next

day leaning bare-elbowed on the ledge of her half-door, her hair in

curl-papers, her face the pale unwholesome pinched oval of most London

women of her class. Her bodice was pinned across her chest; she was

coarse-aproned, new from the wash-tub or the grate. Not a sign upon

her but told of her frowsy round. The stale air of foul lodgment was

upon her. I found out indeed this much about her ostensible state,

that she was the wife of a cab-driver whose name was Ventris. He was

an ill-conditioned, sottish fellow who treated her badly, but had

given her a child. But he was chiefly on night-work at Euston, and the

man whom I had seen familiar with her in the daytime was not he. Her

reputation among her neighbours was not good. She was, in fact, no

better than she should be--or, as I prefer to put it, no better than

she could be.

Yet I knew her, withal, as of the fairy-kind, bound to this

earth-bondage by some law of the Universe not yet explored; not

pitiable because not self-pitying, and (what is more important) not

reprehensible because impossible to be bound, as we are, soul to body.

I know that now, but did not know it then; and yet--extraordinary

thing--I was never shocked by the contrast between her two states of

being. This is to me a clear and certain evidence of their

reality--just as it is evidence to me that when, at ten years old, I

seemed to see the boy in the wood, I really did see him. An

hallucination or a dream upsets your moral balance. The things

impressed upon you are abnormal; and the abnormal disturbs you. Now

these apparitions did not seem abnormal. I saw nothing wonderful in

Mrs. Ventris's act. I was impressed by it, I was excited by it, as I

still am by a convulsion of nature--a thunder-storm in the Alps, for

instance, a water-spout at sea. Such things hold beauty and terror;

they entrance, they appal; but they never shock. They happen, and they

are right. I have not seen what people call a ghost, and I have often

been afraid lest I should see one. But I know very well that if ever I

did I should have no fear. I know very well that a natural fact

impresses its conformity with law upon you first and last. It becomes,

on the moment of its appearance, a part of the landscape. If it does

not, it is an hallucination, or a freak of the imagination, and will

shock you. I have much more extraordinary experiences than this to

relate, but there will be nothing shocking in these pages--at least

nothing which gave me the least sensation of shock. One of them--a

thing extraordinary to all--must occupy a chapter by itself. I cannot

precisely fit a date to it, though I shall try. And as it forms a

whole, having a beginning, a middle and an end, I shall want to

depart from my autobiographical plan and put it in as a whole. The

reader will please to recollect that it did not work itself out in my

consciousness by a flash. The first stages of it came so, in flashes

of revelation; but the conclusion was of some years later, when I was

older and more established in the world.

* * * * *

But before I embark upon it I should like to make a large jump forward

and finish with the young woman of Gaylord's Rents. It was by accident

that I happened upon her at her mysteries, at a later day when I was

living in London, in Camden Town.

By that time I had developed from a lad of inarticulate mind and

unexpressed desires into a sentient and self-conscious being. I was

more or less of a man, not only adventurous but bold in the pursuit of

adventure. I lived for some two or three years in that sorry quarter

of London in complete solitude--"in poverty, total idleness and the

pride of literature," like Doctor Johnson, for though I wrote little I

read much, and though I wrote little I was most conscious that I was

about to write much. It was a period of brooding, of mewing my youth,

and whatever facility of imagination and expression I have since

attained I owe very much to my hermitage in Albert Street.

If I walked in those days it was by night. London at night is a very

different place from the town of business and pleasure of ordinary

acquaintance. During the day I fulfilled my allotted hours at the

desk; but immediately they were over I returned to my lodgings, got

out my books, and sat enthralled until somewhere near midnight. But

then, instead of going to bed, I was called by the night, and forth I

sallied all agog. I walked the city, the embankment, skirted the

parks, unless I were so fortunate as to slip in before gate-shutting.

Often I was able to remain in Kensington Gardens till the opening

hour. Highgate and its woods, Parliament Hill with its splendid

panorama of twinkling beacons and its noble tent of stars, were great

fields for me. Hampstead Heath, Wimbledon, even Richmond and Bushey

have known me at their most secret hour. Such experiences as I have

had of the preternatural will find their place in this book, but not

their chronological place, for the simple reason that, as I kept no

diary, I cannot remember in what order of time they befell me. But it

was on the southern slope of Parliament Hill that I came again upon

the fairy-woman of Gaylord's Rents.

I was there at midnight, a mild radiant night of late April. There

were sheep at graze there, for though it was darkish under the

three-quarter moon, I was used to the dark, and could see them, a

woolly mass, quietly feeding close together. I saw no shepherd

anywhere; but I remember that his dog sat on his haunches apart,

watching them. He was prick-eared, bright-eyed; he grinned and panted

intensely. I didn't then know why he was so excited, but very soon I

did.

I became aware, gradually, that a woman stood among the sheep. She had

not been there when I first saw them, I am sure; nor did I see her

approach them or enter their school. Yet there she was in the midst of

them, seen now by me as she had evidently been seen for some time by

the dog, seen, I suppose, by the sheep--at any rate she stood in the

midst of them, as I say, with her hand actually upon the shoulder of

one of them--but not feared or doubted by any soul of us. The dog was

vividly interested, but did not budge; the sheep went on feeding; I

stood bolt upright, watching.

I knew her the moment I saw her. She was the exquisitely formed, slim

and glowing creature I had seen before, when she launched herself into

the night as a God of Homer--Hermes or Thetis--launched out from

Olympus' top into the sea--"[Greek: ex aitheros empese ponto]," and

words fail me to describe the perfection of her being, a radiant

simulacrum of our own, the inconscient self-sufficiency, the buoyancy

and freedom which she showed me. You may sometimes see boys at their

maddest tip of expectation stand waiting as she now stood, quivering

on the extreme edge of adventure; yet even in their case there is a

consciousness of well being, a kind of rolling of anticipation upon

the palate, a getting of the flavours beforehand. That involves a

certain dissipation of activity; but here all was concentrated. The

whole nature of the creature was strung to one issue only, to that

point when she could fling headlong into activity--an activity in

which every fibre and faculty would be used. A comparison of the

fairy-kind with human beings is never successful, because into our

images of human beings we always import self-consciousness. They know

what they are doing. Fairies do not. But wait a moment; there is a

reason. Human creatures, I think, know what they are doing only too

well, because performance never agrees with desire. They know what

they are doing because it is never exactly what they meant to do, or

what they wanted to do. Now, with fairies, desire to do and

performance are instinctive and simultaneous. If they think, they

think in action. In this they are far more like animals than human

creatures, although the form in which they appear to us, their shape

and colouring are like ours, enhanced and refined. Here now stood this

creature in the semblance of a woman glorified, quivering; and so,

perched high on his haunches, sat the shepherd's dog, and no one could

look at the two and not see their kinship. _Arriere-pensee_ they had

none--and all's said in that. They were shameless, and we are full of

shame. There's the difference; and it is a gulf.

After a while of this quivering suspense she gave a low call, a long

mellow and tremulous cry which, gentle as it was, startled by its

suddenness, as the unexpected call of a water-fowl out of the reeds of

a pond makes the heart jump toward the throat. It was like some bird's

call, but I know of no bird's with which to get a close comparison. It

had the soft quality, soft yet piercing, of a redshank's, but it

shuddered like an owl's. And she held it on as an owl does. But it was

very musical, soft and open-throated, and carried far. It was answered

from a distance, first by a single voice; but then another took it up,

and another; and then another. Slowly so the soft night was filled

with musical cries which quavered about me as fitfully as fire-flies

gleam and glance in all quarters of a garden of olive-trees. It was

enchantment to the ear, a ravishing sound; but it was my eyes which

claimed me now, for soon I saw them coming from all quarters. Or

rather, I saw them there, for I can't say definitely that I saw any

one of them on the way. It is truer to say that I looked and they were

there. Where had been one were now two. Now two were five; now five

were a company; now the company was a host. I have no idea how many

there were of them at any time; but when they joined hands and set to

whirling in a ring they seemed to me to stretch round Parliament Hill

in an endless chain.

How can I be particular about them? They were of both sexes--that was

put beyond doubt; they were garbed as the first of them in something

translucent and grey. It had been quite easy in the lamplight to see

the bare form of the woman whom I first saw in Gaylord's Rents. It was

plain to me that her companions were in the same kind of dress. I

don't think they had girdles; I think their arms and legs were bare. I

should describe the garment as a sleeveless smock to the knees, or

perhaps, more justly, as a sack of silky gauze with a hole for the

head and two for the arms. That was the effect of it. It hung straight

and took the folds natural to it. It was so light that it clung

closely to the body where it met the air. What it was made of I have

no notion; but it was transparent or nearly so. I am pretty sure that

its own colour was grey.

They greeted each other; they flitted about from group to group

greeting; and they greeted by touching, sometimes with their hands,

sometimes with their cheeks. They neither kissed nor spoke. I never

saw them kiss even when they loved--which they rarely did. I saw one

greeting between two females. They ran together and stopped short

within touching distance. They looked brightly and intently at each

other, and leaning forward approached their cheeks till they

touched.[2] They touched by the right, they touched by the left. Then

they took hands and drew together. By a charming movement of

confidence one nestled to the side of the other and resting her head

looked up and laughed. The taller embraced her with her arm and held

her for a moment. The swiftness of the act and its grace were

beautiful to see. Then hand in hand they ran to others who were a

little further off. The elder and taller had a wild dark face with

stern lips, like a man's; the younger was a beautiful little creature

with quick, squirrel's motions. I remember her hair, which looked

white in that light, but was no doubt lint colour. It was extremely

long, and so fine that it clung to her shoulders and back like a web

of thin silk.

[Footnote 2: I argue from this peculiar manner of greeting, which I

have observed several times, that these beings converse by contact, as

dogs, cats, mice, and other creatures certainly do. I don't say that

they have no other means of converse; but I am sure I am exact in

saying that they have no articulate speech.]

They began to play very soon with a zest for mere irresponsible

movement which I have never seen in my own kind. I have seen young

foxes playing, and it was something like that, only incomparably more

graceful. Greyhounds give a better comparison where the rippling of

the body is more expressive of their speed than the flying of their

feet. These creatures must have touched the earth, but their bodies

also ran. And just as young dogs play for the sake of activity,

without method or purpose, so did these; and just as with young

animals the sexes mingle without any hint of sexuality, so did these.

If there was love-making I saw nothing of it there. They met on exact

equality so far as I could judge, the male not desirous, the female

not conscious of being desired.

But it was a mad business under the cloudy moon. It had a dream-like

element of riot and wild triumph. I suppose I must have been there for

two or three hours, during all which time their swift play was never

altogether stopped. There were interludes to be seen, when some three

or four grew suddenly tired and fell out. They threw themselves down

on the sward and lay panting, beaming, watching the others, or they

disappeared into the dark and were lost in the thickets which dot the

ground. Then finally I saw the great whirling ring of them form--under

what common impulse to frenzy I cannot divine. There was no signal,

no preparation, but as if fired in unison they joined hands, and

spreading out to a circumference so wide that I could distinguish

nothing but a ring of light, they whirled faster and faster till the

speed of them sang in my ears like harps, and whirling so, melted

away.

Later on and in wilder surroundings than this I saw, and shall relate

in its place, a dance of Oreads. It differed in detail from this one,

but not, I think, in any essential. This was my first experience of

the kind.

QUIDNUNC

I was so fired by that extraordinary adventure, that I think I could

have overcome my constitutional timidity and made myself acquainted

with the only actor in it who was accessible if I had not become

involved in another matter of the sort. But I don't know that I should

have helped myself thereby. To the night the things of the night

pertain. If I could have had speech with Mrs. Ventris in that season

of her radiancy there would have been no harm; but by day she was

another creature. Thereby contact was impossible because it would have

been horrible. It is true that a certain candour of conduct

distinguished her from the frowsy drabs with whom she must have

jostled in public-house bars or rubbed elbows at lodging-house doors,

a sort of unconsciousness of evil, which I take to have been due to an

entire absence of a moral sense. It is probable that she was not a

miserable sinner because she did not know what was miserable sin. Heat

and cold she knew, hunger and thirst, rage and kindness. She could not

be unwomanly because she was not woman, nor good because she could

not be bad. But I could have been very bad; and to me she was,

luckily, horrible. I could not divorce her two apparent natures, still

less my own. We are bound--all of us--by our natures, bound by them

and bounded. I could not have touched the pitch she lived with, the

pitch of which she was, without defilement. Let me hope that I

realised that much. I shall not say how my feet burned to enter that

slum of squalor where hovered this bird of the night, unless I add, as

I can do with truth, that I did not slake them there. I saw her on and

off afterward for a year, perhaps; but tenancies are short in London.

There was a flitting during one autumn when I was away on vacation,

and I came back to see new faces in the half-doorway and other elbows

on the familiar ledge.

But as I have said above, a new affair engrossed me shortly after my

night pageant on Parliament Hill. This was concerned with a famous

personage whom all knowing London (though I for one had not known it)

called Quidnunc.

But before I present to the curious reader the facts of a case which

caused so much commotion in distinguished bosoms of the late

"eighties," I think I should say that, while I have a strong

conviction as to the identity of the person himself, I shall not

express it. I accept the doctrine that there are some names not to be

uttered. Similarly I shall neither defend nor extenuate; if I throw it

out at all it will be as a hint to the judicious, or a clew, if you

like, to those who are groping a way in or out of the labyrinth of

Being. To me two things are especially absurd: one is that the

trousered, or skirted, forms we eat with, walk with, or pass unheeded,

are all the population of our world; the other, that these creatures,

ostensibly men or women with fancies, hopes, fears, appetites like our

own, are necessarily of the same nature as ourselves. If beings from

another sphere should, by intention or chance, meet and mingle with

us, I don't see how we could apprehend them at all except in our own

mode, or unless they were, so to speak, translated into our idiom. But

enough of that. The year in which I first met Quidnunc, so far as my

memory serves me, was 1886.

* * * * *

Lore of Proserpine · 第 4 / 13 段