CHAPTER V

THE FORMS OF CELLS

Protoplasm, as we have already said, is a fluid or rather a semifluid

substance, and we need not pause here to attempt to describe the

particular properties of the semifluid, colloid, or jelly-like

substances to which it is allied; we should find it no easy matter. Nor

need we appeal to precise theoretical definitions of fluidity, lest

we come into a debateable land. It is in the most general sense that

protoplasm is “fluid.” As Graham said (of colloid matter in general),

“its softness _partakes of fluidity_, and enables the colloid to become

a vehicle for liquid diffusion, like water itself[264].” When we can

deal with protoplasm in sufficient quantity we see it flow; particles

move freely through it, air-bubbles and liquid droplets shew round

or spherical within it; and we shall have much to say about other

phenomena manifested by its own surface, which are those especially

characteristic of liquids. It may encompass and contain solid bodies,

and it may “secrete” within or around itself solid substances; and very

often in the complex living organism these solid substances formed

by the living protoplasm, like shell or nail or horn or feather, may

remain when the protoplasm which formed them is dead and gone; but the

protoplasm itself is fluid or semifluid, and accordingly permits of

free (though not necessarily rapid) _diffusion_ and easy _convection_

of particles within itself. This simple fact is of elementary

importance in connection with form, and with what appear at first sight

to be common characteristics or peculiarities of the forms of living

things.

The older naturalists, in discussing the differences between inorganic

and organic bodies, laid stress upon the fact or statement that the

former grow by “agglutination,” and the latter by {202} what they

termed “intussusception.” The contrast is true, rather, of solid as

compared with jelly-like bodies of all kinds, living or dead, the great

majority of which as it so happens, but by no means all, are of organic

origin.

A crystal “grows” by deposition of new molecules, one by one and

layer by layer, superimposed or aggregated upon the solid substratum

already formed. Each particle would seem to be influenced, practically

speaking, only by the particles in its immediate neighbourhood, and

to be in a state of freedom and independence from the influence,

either direct or indirect, of its remoter neighbours. As Lord Kelvin

and others have explained the formation and the resulting forms of

crystals, so we believe that each added particle takes up its position

in relation to its immediate neighbours already arranged, generally in

the holes and corners that their arrangement leaves, and in closest

contact with the greatest number[265]. And hence we may repeat or

imitate this process of arrangement, with great or apparently even with

precise accuracy (in the case of the simpler crystalline systems), by

piling up spherical pills or grains of shot. In so doing, we must have

regard to the fact that each particle must drop into the place where it

can go most easily, or where no easier place offers. In more technical

language, each particle is free to take up, and does take up, its

position of least potential energy relative to those already deposited;

in other words, for each particle motion is induced until the energy

of the system is so distributed that no tendency or resultant force

remains to move it more. The application of this principle has been

shewn to lead to the production of _planes_[266] (in all cases where

by the limitation of material, surfaces _must_ occur); and where we

have planes, straight edges and solid angles must obviously also occur;

and, if equilibrium is {203} to follow, must occur symmetrically. Our

piling up of shot, or manufacture of mimic crystals, gives us visible

demonstration that the result is actually to obtain, as in the natural

crystal, plane surfaces and sharp angles, symmetrically disposed.

But the living cell grows in a totally different way, very much

as a piece of glue swells up in water, by “imbibition,” or by

interpenetration into and throughout its entire substance. The

semifluid colloid mass takes up water, partly to combine chemically

with its individual molecules[267], partly by physical diffusion into

the interstices between these molecules, and partly, as it would seem,

in other ways; so that the entire phenomenon is a very complex and

even an obscure one. But, so far as we are concerned, the net result

is a very simple one. For the equilibrium or tendency to equilibrium

of fluid pressure in all parts of its interior while the process of

imbibition is going on, the constant rearrangement of its fluid mass,

the contrast in short with the crystalline method of growth where each

particle comes to rest to move (relatively to the whole) no more, lead

the mass of jelly to swell up, very much as a bladder into which we

blow air, and so, by a _graded_ and harmonious distribution of forces,

to assume everywhere a rounded and more or less bubble-like external

form[268]. So, when the same school of older naturalists called

attention to a new distinction or contrast of form between the organic

and inorganic objects, in that the contours of the former tended to

roundness and curvature, and those of the latter to be bounded by

straight lines, planes and sharp angles, we see that this contrast was

not a new and different one, but only another aspect of their former

statement, and an immediate consequence of the difference between the

processes of agglutination and intussusception.

This common and general contrast between the form of the crystal on

the one hand, and of the colloid or of the organism on the other, must

by no means be pressed too far. For Lehmann, {204} in his great work on

so-called Fluid Crystals[269], to which we shall afterwards return, has

shewn how, under certain circumstances, surface-tension phenomena may

coexist with crystallisation, and produce a form of minimal potential

which is a resultant of both: the fact being that the bonds maintaining

the crystalline arrangement are now so much looser than in the solid

condition that the tendency to least total surface-area is capable

of being satisfied. Thus the phenomenon of “liquid crystallisation”

does not destroy the distinction between crystalline and colloidal

forms, but gives added unity and continuity to the whole series of

phenomena[270]. Lehmann has also demonstrated phenomena within the

crystal, known for instance as transcrystallisation, which shew us that

we must not speak unguardedly of the growth of crystals as limited to

deposition upon a surface, and Bütschli has already pointed out the

possible great importance to the biologist of the various phenomena

which Lehmann has described[271].

So far then, as growth goes on, unaffected by pressure or other

external force, the fluidity of protoplasm, its mobility internal and

external, and the manner in which particles move with comparative

freedom from place to place within, all manifestly tend to the

production of swelling, rounded surfaces, and to their great

predominance over plane surfaces in the contour of the organism. These

rounded contours will tend to be preserved, for a while, in the case of

naked protoplasm by its viscosity, and in the presence of a cell-wall

by its very lack of fluidity. In a general way, the presence of curved

boundary surfaces will be especially obvious in the unicellular

organisms, and still more generally in the _external_ forms of all

organisms; and wherever mutual pressure between adjacent cells, or

other adjacent parts, has not come into play to flatten the rounded

surfaces into planes.

But the rounded contours that are assumed and exhibited by {205} a

piece of hard glue, when we throw it into water and see it expand as it

sucks the water up, are not nearly so regular or so beautiful as are

those which appear when we blow a bubble, or form a drop, or pour water

into a more or less elastic bag. For these curving contours depend upon

the properties of the bag itself, of the film or membrane that contains

the mobile gas, or that contains or bounds the mobile liquid mass. And

hereby, in the case of the fluid or semifluid mass, we are introduced

to the subject of _surface tension_: of which indeed we have spoken in

the preceding chapter, but which we must now examine with greater care.

――――――――――

Among the forces which determine the forms of cells, whether they

be solitary or arranged in contact with one another, this force of

surface-tension is certainly of great, and is probably of paramount

importance. But while we shall try to separate out the phenomena which

are directly due to it, we must not forget that, in each particular

case, the actual conformation which we study may be, and usually is,

the more or less complex resultant of surface tension acting together

with gravity, mechanical pressure, osmosis, or other physical forces.

Surface tension is that force by which we explain the form of a drop

or of a bubble, of the surfaces external and internal of a “froth” or

collocation of bubbles, and of many other things of like nature and in

like circumstances[272]. It is a property of liquids (in the sense at

least with which our subject is concerned), and it is manifested at or

very near the surface, where the liquid comes into contact with another

liquid, a solid or a gas. We note here that the term _surface_ is to

be interpreted in a wide sense; for wherever we have solid particles

imbedded in a fluid, wherever we have a non-homogeneous fluid or

semi-fluid such as a particle {206} of protoplasm, wherever we have

the presence of “impurities,” as in a mass of molten metal, there we

have always to bear in mind the existence of “surfaces” and of surface

tensions, not only on the exterior of the mass but also throughout its

interstices, wherever like meets unlike.

Surface tension is due to molecular force, to force that is to

say arising from the action of one molecule upon another, and it

is accordingly exerted throughout a small thickness of material,

comparable to the range of the molecular forces. We imagine that within

the interior of the liquid mass such molecular interactions negative

one another: but that at and near the free surface, within a layer or

film approximately equal to the range of the molecular force, there

must be a lack of such equilibrium and consequently a manifestation of

force.

The action of the molecular forces has been variously explained. But

one simple explanation (or mode of statement) is that the molecules

of the surface layer (whose thickness is definite and constant) are

being constantly attracted into the interior by those which are more

deeply situated, and that consequently, as molecules keep quitting the

surface for the interior, the bulk of the latter increases while the

surface diminishes; and the process continues till the surface itself

has become a minimum, the _surface-shrinkage_ exhibiting itself as a

_surface-tension_. This is a sufficient description of the phenomenon

in cases where a portion of liquid is subject to no other than _its

own molecular forces_, and (since the sphere has, of all solids, the

smallest surface for a given volume) it accounts for the spherical form

of the raindrop, of the grain of shot, or of the living cell in many

simple organisms. It accounts also, as we shall presently see, for a

great number of much more complicated forms, manifested under less

simple conditions.

Let us here briefly note that surface tension is, in itself, a

comparatively small force, and easily measurable: for instance that

of water is equivalent to but a few grains per linear inch, or a few

grammes per metre. But this small tension, when it exists in a _curved_

surface of very great curvature, gives rise to a very great pressure

directed towards the centre of curvature. We can easily calculate this

pressure, and so satisfy ourselves that, when the radius of curvature

is of molecular dimensions, the {207} pressure is of the magnitude

of thousands of atmospheres,—a conclusion which is supported by other

physical considerations.

The contraction of a liquid surface and other phenomena of surface

tension involve the doing of work, and the power to do work is what

we call energy. It is obvious, in such a simple case as we have just

considered, that the whole energy of the system is diffused throughout

its molecules; but of this whole stock of energy it is only that

part which comes into play at or very near to the surface which

normally manifests itself in work, and hence we may speak (though

the term is open to some objections) of a specific _surface energy_.

The consideration of surface energy, and of the manner in which its

amount is increased and multiplied by the multiplication of surfaces

due to the subdivision of the organism into cells, is of the highest

importance to the physiologist; and even the morphologist cannot wholly

pass it by, if he desires to study the form of the cell in its relation

to the phenomena of surface tension or “capillarity.” The case has

been set forth with the utmost possible lucidity by Tait and by Clerk

Maxwell, on whose teaching the following paragraphs are based: they

having based their teaching upon that of Gauss,—who rested on Laplace.

Let _E_ be the whole potential energy of a mass _M_ of liquid; let

_e__{0} be the energy per unit mass of the interior liquid (we may call

it the _internal energy_); and let _e_ be the energy per unit mass for

a layer of the skin, of surface _S_, of thickness _t_, and density

ρ (_e_ being what we call the _surface energy_). It is obvious that

the total energy consists of the internal _plus_ the surface energy,

and that the former is distributed through the whole mass, minus its

surface layers. That is to say, in mathematical language,

_E_ = (_M_ − _S_ ⋅ Σ _t_ ρ) _e__{0} + _S_ ⋅ Σ _t_ ρ _e_.

But this is equivalent to writing:

= _M_ _e__{0} + _S_ ⋅ Σ _t_ ρ(_e_ − _e__{0});

and this is as much as to say that the total energy of the system may

be taken to consist of two portions, one uniform throughout the whole

mass, and another, which is proportional on the one hand to the amount

of surface, and on the other hand is proportional to the difference

between _e_ and _e__{0}, that is to say to the difference between the

unit values of the internal and the surface energy. {208}

It was Gauss who first shewed after this fashion how, from the mutual

attractions between all the particles, we are led to an expression

which is what we now call the _potential energy_ of the system; and we

know, as a fundamental theorem of dynamics, that the potential energy

of the system tends to a minimum, and in that minimum finds, as a

matter of course, its stable equilibrium.

――――――――――

We see in our last equation that the term _M_ _e__{0} is irreducible,

save by a reduction of the mass itself. But the other term may be

diminished (1) by a reduction in the area of surface, _S_, or (2) by

a tendency towards equality of _e_ and _e__{0}, that is to say by a

diminution of the specific surface energy, _e_.

These then are the two methods by which the energy of the system will

manifest itself in work. The one, which is much the more important for

our purposes, leads always to a diminution of surface, to the so-called

“principle of minimal areas”; the other, which leads to the lowering

(under certain circumstances) of surface tension, is the basis of the

theory of Adsorption, to which we shall have some occasion to refer

as the _modus operandi_ in the development of a cell-wall, and in a

variety of other histological phenomena. In the technical phraseology

of the day, the “capacity factor” is involved in the one case, and the

“intensity factor” in the other.

Inasmuch as we are concerned with the form of the cell it is the

former which becomes our main postulate: telling us that the energy

equations of the surface of a cell, or of the free surfaces of cells

partly in contact, or of the partition-surfaces of cells in contact

with one another or with an adjacent solid, all indicate a minimum

of potential energy in the system, by which the system is brought,

_ipso facto_, into equilibrium. And we shall not fail to observe, with

something more than mere historical interest and curiosity, how deeply

and intrinsically there enter into this whole class of problems the

“principle of least action” of Maupertuis, the “_lineae curvae maximi

minimive proprietate gaudentes_” of Euler, by which principles these

old natural philosophers explained correctly a multitude of phenomena,

and drew the lines whereon the foundations of great part of modern

physics are well and truly laid. {209}

In all cases where the principle of maxima and minima comes into play,

as it conspicuously does in the systems of liquid films which are

governed by the laws of surface-tension, the figures and conformations

produced are characterised by obvious and remarkable _symmetry_. Such

symmetry is in a high degree characteristic of organic forms, and is

rarely absent in living things,—save in such cases as amoeba, where

the equilibrium on which symmetry depends is likewise lacking. And if

we ask what physical equilibrium has to do with formal symmetry and

regularity, the reason is not far to seek; nor can it be put better

than in the following words of Mach’s[273]. “In every symmetrical

system every deformation that tends to destroy the symmetry is

complemented by an equal and opposite deformation that tends to restore

it. In each deformation positive and negative work is done. One

condition, therefore, though not an absolutely sufficient one, that a

maximum or minimum of work corresponds to the form of equilibrium, is

thus supplied by symmetry. Regularity is successive symmetry. There is

no reason, therefore, to be astonished that the forms of equilibrium

are often symmetrical and regular.”

――――――――――

As we proceed in our enquiry, and especially when we approach the

subject of _tissues_, or agglomerations of cells, we shall have from

time to time to call in the help of elementary mathematics. But

already, with very little mathematical help, we find ourselves in a

position to deal with some simple examples of organic forms.

When we melt a stick of sealing-wax in the flame, surface tension

(which was ineffectively present in the solid but finds play in the

now fluid mass), rounds off its sharp edges into curves, so striving

towards a surface of minimal area; and in like manner, by melting the

tip of a thin rod of glass, Leeuwenhoek made the little spherical beads

which served him for a microscope[274]. When any drop of protoplasm,

either over all its surface or at some free end, as at the extremity

of the pseudopodium of an amoeba, is {210} seen likewise to “round

itself off,” that is not an effect of “vital contractility,” but (as

Hofmeister shewed so long ago as 1867) a simple consequence of surface

tension; and almost immediately afterwards Engelmann[275] argued on the

same lines, that the forces which cause the contraction of protoplasm

in general may “be just the same as those which tend to make every

non-spherical drop of fluid become spherical!” We are not concerned

here with the many theories and speculations which would connect the

phenomena of surface tension with contractility, muscular movement or

other special _physiological_ functions, but we find ample room to

trace the operation of the same cause in producing, under conditions of

rest and equilibrium, certain definite and inevitable forms of surface.

It is however of great importance to observe that the living cell is

one of those cases where the phenomena of surface tension are by no

means limited to the _outer_ surface; for within the heterogeneous

substance of the cell, between the protoplasm and its nuclear and

other contents, and in the alveolar network of the cytoplasm itself

(so far as that “alveolar structure” is actually present in life), we

have a multitude of interior surfaces; and, especially among plants,

we may have a large inner surface of “interfacial” contact, where the

protoplasm contains cavities or “vacuoles” filled with a different and

more fluid material, the “cell-sap.” Here we have a great field for

the development of surface tension phenomena: and so long ago as 1865,

Nägeli and Schwendener shewed that the streaming currents of plant

cells might be very plausibly explained by this phenomenon. Even ten

years earlier, Weber had remarked upon the resemblance between these

protoplasmic streamings and the streamings to be observed in certain

inanimate drops, for which no cause but surface tension could be

assigned[276].

The case of amoeba, though it is an elementary case, is at the same

time a complicated one. While it remains “amoeboid,” it is never at

rest or in equilibrium; it is always moving, from one to another of its

protean changes of configuration; its surface tension is constantly

varying from point to point. Where the {211} surface tension is

greater, that portion of the surface will contract into spherical or

spheroidal forms; where it is less the surface will correspondingly

extend. While generally speaking the surface energy has a minimal

value, it is not necessarily constant. It may be diminished by a

rise of temperature; it may be altered by contact with adjacent

substances[277], by the transport of constituent materials from the

interior to the surface, or again by actual chemical and fermentative

change. Within the cell, the surface energies developed about its

heterogeneous contents will constantly vary as these contents are

affected by chemical metabolism. As the colloid materials are broken

down and as the particles in suspension are diminished in size the

“free surface energy” will be increased, but the osmotic energy will

be diminished[278]. Thus arise the various fluctuations of surface

tension and the various phenomena of amoeboid form and motion, which

Bütschli and others have reproduced or imitated by means of the fine

emulsions which constitute their “artificial amoebae.” A multitude

of experiments shew how extraordinarily delicate is the adjustment

of the surface tension forces, and how sensitive they are to the

least change of temperature or chemical state. Thus, on a plate

which we have warmed at one side, a drop of alcohol runs towards the

warm area, a drop of oil away from it; and a drop of water on the

glass plate exhibits lively movements when {212} we bring into its

neighbourhood a heated wire, or a glass rod dipped in ether. When we

find that a plasmodium of Aethalium, for instance, creeps towards a

damp spot, or towards a warm spot, or towards substances that happen

to be nutritious, and again creeps away from solutions of sugar or of

salt, we seem to be dealing with phenomena every one of which can be

paralleled by ordinary phenomena of surface tension[279]. Even the

soap-bubble itself is imperfectly in equilibrium, for the reason that

its film, like the protoplasm of amoeba or Aethalium, is an excessively

heterogeneous substance. Its surface tensions vary from point to

point, and chemical changes and changes of temperature increase and

magnify the variation. The whole surface of the bubble is in constant

movement as the concentrated portions of the soapy fluid make their way

outwards from the deeper layers; it thins and it thickens, its colours

change, currents are set up in it, and little bubbles glide over it; it

continues in this state of constant movement, as its parts strive one

with another in all their interactions towards equilibrium[280].

In the case of the naked protoplasmic cell, as the amoeboid phase

is emphatically a phase of freedom and activity, of chemical and

physiological change, so, on the other hand, is the spherical form

indicative of a phase of rest or comparative inactivity. In the one

phase we see unequal surface tensions manifested in the creeping

movements of the amoeboid body, in the rounding off of the ends of the

pseudopodia, in the flowing out of its substance over a particle of

“food,” and in the current-motions in the interior of its mass; till

finally, in the other phase, when internal homogeneity and equilibrium

have been attained and the potential {213} energy of the system is for

the time being at a minimum, the cell assumes a rounded or spherical

form, passing into a state of “rest,” and (for a reason which we shall

presently see) becoming at the same time “encysted.”

[Illustration: Fig. 60.]

In a budding yeast-cell (Fig. 60), we see a more definite and

restricted change of surface tension. When a “bud” appears, whether

with or without actual growth by osmosis or otherwise of the mass,

it does so because at a certain part of the cell-surface the surface

tension has more or less suddenly diminished, and the area of that

portion expands accordingly; but in turn the surface tension of the

expanded area will make itself felt, and the bud will be rounded off

into a more or less spherical form.

The yeast-cell with its bud is a simple example of a principle which

we shall find to be very important. Our whole treatment of cell-form

in relation to surface-tension depends on the fact (which Errera was

the first to point out, or to give clear expression to) that the

_incipient_ cell-wall retains with but little impairment the properties

of a liquid film[281], and that the growing cell, in spite of the

membrane by which it has already begun to be surrounded, behaves very

much like a fluid drop. But even the ordinary yeast-cell shows, by its

ovoid and non-spherical form, that it has acquired its shape under

the influence of some force other than that uniform and symmetrical

surface-tension which would be productive of a sphere; and this or

any other asymmetrical form, once acquired, may be retained by virtue

of the solidification and consequent rigidity of the membranous wall

of the cell. Unless such rigidity ensue, it is plain that such a

conformation as that of the cell with its attached bud could not be

long retained, amidst the constantly varying conditions, as a figure

of even partial equilibrium. But as a matter of fact, the cell in this

case is not in equilibrium at all; it is in _process_ of budding, and

is slowly altering its shape by rounding off the bud. It is plain that

over its surface the surface-energies are unequally distributed, owing

to some heterogeneity of the substance; and to this matter we shall

afterwards return. In like manner the developing egg {214} through all

its successive phases of form is never in complete equilibrium; but

is merely responding to constantly changing conditions, by phases of

partial, transitory, unstable and conditional equilibrium.

It is obvious that there are innumerable solitary plant-cells, and

unicellular organisms in general, which, like the yeast-cell, do not

correspond to any of the simple forms that may be generated under the

influence of simple and homogeneous surface-tension; and in many cases

these forms, which we should expect to be unstable and transitory,

have become fixed and stable by reason of the comparatively sudden or

rapid solidification of the envelope. This is the case, for instance,

in many of the more complicated forms of diatoms or of desmids, where

we are dealing, in a less striking but even more curious way than in

the budding yeast-cell, not with one simple act of formation, but

with a complicated result of successive stages of localised growth,

interrupted by phases of partial consolidation. The original cell has

acquired or assumed a certain form, and then, under altering conditions

and new distributions of energy, has thickened here or weakened there,

and has grown out or tended (as it were) to branch, at particular

points. We can often, or indeed generally, trace in each particular

stage of growth or at each particular temporary growing point, the laws

of surface tension manifesting themselves in what is for the time being

a fluid surface; nay more, even in the adult and completed structure,

we have little difficulty in tracing and recognising (for instance

in the outline of such a desmid as Euastrum) the rounded lobes that

have successively grown or flowed out from the original rounded and

flattened cell. What we see in a many chambered foraminifer, such as

Globigerina or Rotalia, is just the same thing, save that it is carried

out in greater completeness and perfection. The little organism as a

whole is not a figure of equilibrium or of minimal area; but each new

bud or separate chamber is such a figure, conditioned by the forces of

surface tension, and superposed upon the complex aggregate of similar

bubbles after these latter have become consolidated one by one into a

rigid system.

――――――――――

Let us now make some enquiry regarding the various forms {215} which,

under the influence of surface tension, a surface can possibly assume.

In doing so, we are obviously limited to conditions under which other

forces are relatively unimportant, that is to say where the “surface

energy” is a considerable fraction of the whole energy of the system;

and this in general will be the case when we are dealing with portions

of liquid so small that their dimensions come within what we have

called the molecular range, or, more generally, in which the “specific

surface” is large[282]: in other words it will be small or minute

organisms, or the small cellular elements of larger organisms, whose

forms will be governed by surface-tension; while the general forms of

the larger organisms will be due to other and non-molecular forces.

For instance, a large surface of water sets itself level because here

gravity is predominant; but the surface of water in a narrow tube

is manifestly curved, for the reason that we are here dealing with

particles which are mutually within the range of each other’s molecular

forces. The same is the case with the cell-surfaces and cell-partitions

which we are presently to study, and the effect of gravity will

be especially counteracted and concealed when, as in the case of

protoplasm in a watery fluid, the object is immersed in a liquid of

nearly its own specific gravity.

We have already learned, as a fundamental law of surface-tension

phenomena, that a liquid film _in equilibrium_ assumes a form which

gives it a minimal area under the conditions to which it is subject.

And these conditions include (1) the form of the boundary, if such

exist, and (2) the pressure, if any, to which the film is subject;

which pressure is closely related to the volume, of air or of liquid,

which the film (if it be a closed one) may have to contain. In the

simplest of cases, when we take up a soap-film on a plane wire ring,

the film is exposed to equal atmospheric pressure on both sides, and it

obviously has its minimal area in the form of a plane. So long as our

wire ring lies in one plane (however irregular in outline), the film

stretched across it will still be in a plane; but if we bend the ring

so that it lies no longer in a plane, then our film will become curved

into a surface which may be extremely complicated, but is still the

smallest possible {216} surface which can be drawn continuously across

the uneven boundary.

The question of pressure involves not only external pressures acting on

the film, but also that which the film itself is capable of exerting.

For we have seen that the film is always contracting to its smallest

limits; and when the film is curved, this obviously leads to a pressure

directed inwards,—perpendicular, that is to say, to the surface of

the film. In the case of the soap-bubble, the uniform contraction

of whose surface has led to its spherical form, this pressure is

balanced by the pressure of the air within; and if an outlet be given

for this air, then the bubble contracts with perceptible force until

it stretches across the mouth of the tube, for instance the mouth of

the pipe through which we have blown the bubble. A precisely similar

pressure, directed inwards, is exercised by the surface layer of a

drop of water or a globule of mercury, or by the surface pellicle on a

portion or “drop” of protoplasm. Only we must always remember that in

the soap-bubble, or the bubble which a glass-blower blows, there is a

twofold pressure as compared with that which the surface-film exercises

on the drop of liquid of which it is a part; for the bubble consists

(unless it be so thin as to consist of a mere layer of molecules[283])

of a liquid layer, with a free surface within and another without, and

each of these two surfaces exercises its own independent and coequal

tension, and corresponding pressure[284].

If we stretch a tape upon a flat table, whatever be the tension of

the tape it obviously exercises no pressure upon the table below. But

if we stretch it over a _curved_ surface, a cylinder for instance, it

does exercise a downward pressure; and the more curved the surface the

greater is this pressure, that is to say the greater is this share

of the entire force of tension which is resolved in the downward

direction. In mathematical language, the pressure (_p_) varies directly

as the tension (_T_), and inversely as the radius of curvature (_R_):

that is to say, _p_ = _T_/_R_, per unit of surface. {217}

If instead of a cylinder, which is curved only in one direction,

we take a case where there are curvatures in two dimensions (as

for instance a sphere), then the effects of these must be simply

added to one another, and the resulting pressure _p_ is equal to

_T_/_R_ + _T_/_R′_ or _p_ = _T_(1/_R_ + 1/_R′_)[285].

And if in addition to the pressure _p_, which is due to surface

tension, we have to take into account other pressures, _p′_, _p″_,

etc., which are due to gravity or other forces, then we may say that

the _total pressure_, _P_ = _p′_ + _p″_ + _T_(1/_R_ + 1/_R′_). While

in some cases, for instance in speaking of the shape of a bird’s egg,

we shall have to take account of these extraneous pressures, in the

present part of our subject we shall for the most part be able to

neglect them.

Our equation is an equation of equilibrium. The resistance to

compression,—the pressure outwards,—of our fluid mass, is a constant

quantity (_P_); the pressure inwards, _T_(1/_R_ + 1/_R′_), is also

constant; and if (unlike the case of the mobile amoeba) the surface

be homogeneous, so that _T_ is everywhere equal, it follows that

throughout the whole surface 1/_R_ + 1/_R′_ = _C_ (a constant).

Now equilibrium is attained after the surface contraction has done

its utmost, that is to say when it has reduced the surface to the

smallest possible area; and so we arrive, from the physical side, at

the conclusion that a surface such that 1/_R_ + 1/_R′_ = _C_, in other

words a surface which has the same _mean curvature_ at all points, is

equivalent to a surface of minimal area: and to the same conclusion we

may also arrive through purely analytical mathematics. It is obvious

that the plane and the sphere are two examples of such surfaces, for in

both cases the radius of curvature is everywhere constant, being equal

to infinity in the case of the plane, and to some definite magnitude in

the case of the sphere.

From the fact that we may extend a soap-film across a ring of wire

however fantastically the latter may be bent, we realise that there

is no limit to the number of surfaces of minimal area which may be

constructed or may be imagined; and while some of these are very

complicated indeed, some, for instance a spiral helicoid screw, are

relatively very simple. But if we limit ourselves to {218} _surfaces

of revolution_ (that is to say, to surfaces symmetrical about an axis),

we find, as Plateau was the first to shew, that those which meet the

case are very few in number. They are six in all, namely the plane, the

sphere, the cylinder, the catenoid, the unduloid, and a curious surface

which Plateau called the nodoid.

These several surfaces are all closely related, and the passage from

one to another is generally easy. Their mathematical interrelation is

expressed by the fact (first shewn by Delaunay[286], in 1841) that

the plane curves by whose rotation they are generated are themselves

generated as “roulettes” of the conic sections.

Let us imagine a straight line upon which a circle, an ellipse or other

conic section rolls; the focus of the conic section will describe a

line in some relation to the fixed axis, and this line (or roulette),

rotating around the axis, will describe in space one or other of the

six surfaces of revolution with which we are dealing.

[Illustration: Fig. 61.]

If we imagine an ellipse so to roll over a line, either of its

foci will describe a sinuous or wavy line (Fig. 61B) at a distance

alternately maximal and minimal from the axis; and this wavy line,

by rotation about the axis, becomes the meridional line of the

surface which we call the _unduloid_. The more unequal the two axes

are of our ellipse, the more pronounced will be the sinuosity of the

described roulette. If the two axes be equal, then our ellipse becomes

a circle, and the path described by its rolling centre is a straight

line parallel to the axis (A); and obviously the solid of revolution

generated therefrom will be a _cylinder_. If one axis of our ellipse

vanish, while the other remain of finite length, then the ellipse

is reduced to a straight line, and its roulette will appear as a

succession of semicircles touching one another upon the axis (C); the

solid of revolution will be a series of equal _spheres_. If as before

one axis of the ellipse vanish, but the other be infinitely long, then

the curve described by the rotation {219} of this latter will be a

circle of infinite radius, i.e. a straight line infinitely distant

from the axis; and the surface of rotation is now a _plane_. If we

imagine one focus of our ellipse to remain at a given distance from the

axis, but the other to become infinitely remote, that is tantamount to

saying that the ellipse becomes transformed into a parabola; and by the

rolling of this curve along the axis there is described a catenary (D),

whose solid of revolution is the _catenoid_.

Lastly, but this is a little more difficult to imagine, we have the

case of the hyperbola.

We cannot well imagine the hyperbola rolling upon a fixed straight

line so that its focus shall describe a continuous curve. But let

us suppose that the fixed line is, to begin with, asymptotic to one

branch of the hyperbola, and that the rolling proceed until the line

is now asymptotic to the other branch, that is to say touching it at

an infinite distance; there will then be mathematical continuity if

we recommence rolling with this second branch, and so in turn with

the other, when each has run its course. We shall see, on reflection,

that the line traced by one and the same focus will be an “elastic

curve” describing a succession of kinks or knots (E), and the solid

of revolution described by this meridional line about the axis is the

so-called _nodoid_.

The physical transition of one of these surfaces into another can be

experimentally illustrated by means of soap-bubbles, or better still,

after the method of Plateau, by means of a large globule of oil,

supported when necessary by wire rings, within a fluid of specific

gravity equal to its own.

To prepare a mixture of alcohol and water of a density precisely equal

to that of the oil-globule is a troublesome matter, and a method

devised by Mr C. R. Darling is a great improvement on Plateau’s[287].

Mr Darling uses the oily liquid orthotoluidene, which does not mix with

water, has a beautiful and conspicuous red colour, and has precisely

the same density as water when both are kept at a temperature of 24° C.

We have therefore only to run the liquid into water at this temperature

in order to produce beautifully spherical drops of any required size:

and by adding {220} a little salt to the lower layers of water, the

drop may be made to float or rest upon the denser liquid.

We have already seen that the soap-bubble, spherical to begin with,

is transformed into a plane when we relieve its internal pressure and

let the film shrink back upon the orifice of the pipe. If we blow

a small bubble and then catch it up on a second pipe, so that it

stretches between, we may gradually draw the two pipes apart, with

the result that the spheroidal surface will be gradually flattened

in a longitudinal direction, and the bubble will be transformed into

a cylinder. But if we draw the pipes yet farther apart, the cylinder

will narrow in the middle into a sort of hourglass form, the increasing

curvature of its transverse section being balanced by a gradually

increasing _negative_ curvature in the longitudinal section. The

cylinder has, in turn, been converted into an unduloid. When we hold a

portion of a soft glass tube in the flame, and “draw it out,” we are

in the same identical fashion converting a cylinder into an unduloid

(Fig. 62A); when on the other hand we stop the end and blow, we again

convert the cylinder into an unduloid (B), but into one which is now

positively, while the former was negatively curved. The two figures are

essentially the same, save that the two halves of the one are reversed

in the other.

[Illustration: Fig. 62.]

That spheres, cylinders and unduloids are of the commonest occurrence

among the forms of small unicellular organism, or of individual cells

in the simpler aggregates, and that in the processes of growth,

reproduction and development transitions are frequent from one of these

forms to another, is obvious to the naturalist, and we shall deal

presently with a few illustrations of these phenomena.

But before we go further in this enquiry, it will be necessary to

consider, to some small extent at least, the _curvatures_ of the six

different surfaces, that is to say, to determine what modification

{221} is required, in each case, of the general equation which applies

to them all. We shall find that with this question is closely connected

the question of the _pressures_ exercised by, or impinging on the film,

and also the very important question of the limitations which, from the

nature of the case, exist to prevent the extension of certain of the

figures beyond certain bounds. The whole subject is mathematical, and

we shall only deal with it in the most elementary way.

We have seen that, in our general formula, the expression

1/_R_ + 1/_R′_ = _C_, a constant; and that this is, in all cases, the

condition of our surface being one of minimal area. In other words, it

is always true for one and all of the six surfaces which we have to

consider. But the constant _C_ may have any value, positive, negative,

or nil.

In the case of the plane, where _R_ and _R′_ are both infinite, it is

obvious that 1/_R_ + 1/_R′_ = 0. The expression therefore vanishes,

and our dynamical equation of equilibrium becomes _P_ = _p_. In short,

we can only have a plane film, or we shall only find a plane surface

in our cell, when on either side thereof we have equal pressures or no

pressure at all. A simple case is the plane partition between two equal

and similar cells, as in a filament of spirogyra.

In the case of the sphere, the radii are all equal, _R_ = _R′_; they

are also positive, and _T_ (1/_R_ + 1/_R′_), or 2 _T_/_R_, is a

positive quantity, involving a positive pressure _P_, on the other side

of the equation.

In the cylinder, one radius of curvature has the finite and positive

value _R_; but the other is infinite. Our formula becomes _T_/_R_,

to which corresponds a positive pressure _P_, supplied by the

surface-tension as in the case of the sphere, but evidently of just

half the magnitude developed in the latter case for a given value of

the radius _R_.

The catenoid has the remarkable property that its curvature in one

direction is precisely equal and opposite to its curvature in the

other, this property holding good for all points of the surface. That

is to say, _R_ = −_R′_; and the expression becomes

(1/_R_ + 1/_R′_) = (1/_R_ − 1/_R_) = 0;

in other words, the surface, as in the case of the plane, has _no

{222} curvature_, and exercises no pressure. There are no other

surfaces, save these two, which share this remarkable property; and it

follows, as a simple corollary, that we may expect at times to have

the catenoid and the plane coexisting, as parts of one and the same

boundary system; just as, in a cylindrical drop or cell, the cylinder

is capped by portions of spheres, such that the cylindrical and

spherical portions of the wall exert equal positive pressures.

In the unduloid, unlike the four surfaces which we have just been

considering, it is obvious that the curvatures change from one point

to another. At the middle of one of the swollen portions, or “beads,”

the two curvatures are both positive; the expression (1/_R_ + 1/_R′_)

is therefore positive, and it is also finite. The film, accordingly,

exercises a positive tension inwards, which must be compensated by a

finite and positive outward pressure _P_. At the middle of one of the

narrow necks, between two adjacent beads, there is obviously, in the

transverse direction, a much stronger curvature than in the former

case, and the curvature which balances it is now a negative one. But

the sum of the two must remain positive, as well as constant; and we

therefore see that the convex or positive curvature must always be

greater than the concave or negative curvature at the same point. This

is plainly the case in our figure of the unduloid.

The nodoid is, like the unduloid, a continuous curve which keeps

altering its curvature as it alters its distance from the axis; but

in this case the resultant pressure inwards is negative instead of

positive. But this curve is a complicated one, and a full discussion of

it would carry us beyond our scope.

[Illustration: Fig. 63.]

In one of Plateau’s experiments, a bubble of oil (protected from

gravity by the specific gravity of the surrounding fluid being

identical with its own) is balanced between two annuli. It may then be

brought to assume the form of Fig. 63, that is to say the form of a

cylinder with spherical ends; and there is then everywhere, owing to

the convexity of the surface film, a pressure inwards upon the fluid

contents of the bubble. If the surrounding liquid be ever so little

heavier or lighter than that which constitutes the drop, then the

conditions of equilibrium will be accordingly {223} modified, and the

cylindrical drop will assume the form of an unduloid (Fig. 64 A, B),

with its dilated portion below or above,

[Illustration: Fig. 64.]

as the case may be; and our cylinder may also, of course, be

converted into an unduloid either by elongating it further, or by

abstracting a portion of its oil, until at length rupture ensues and

the cylinder breaks up into two new spherical drops. In all cases

alike, the unduloid, like the original cylinder, will be capped by

spherical ends, which are the sign, and the consequence, of the

positive pressure produced by the curved walls of the unduloid. But

if our initial cylinder, instead of being tall, be a flat or dumpy

one (with certain definite relations of height to breadth), then new

phenomena may be exhibited. For now, if a little oil be cautiously

withdrawn from the mass by help of a small syringe, the cylinder may be

made to flatten down so that its upper and lower surfaces become plane;

which is of itself an indication that the pressure inwards is now

_nil_. But at the very moment when the upper and lower surfaces become

plane, it will be found that the sides curve inwards, in the fashion

shewn in Fig. 65B. This figure is a catenoid, which, as

[Illustration: Fig. 65.]

we have already seen, is, like the plane itself, a surface exercising

no pressure, and which therefore may coexist with the plane as part

of one and the same system. We may continue to withdraw more oil from

our bubble, drop by drop, and now the upper and lower surfaces dimple

down into concave portions of spheres, as the result of the _negative_

internal pressure; and thereupon the peripheral catenoid surface alters

its form (perhaps, on this small scale, imperceptibly), and becomes a

portion of a nodoid (Fig. 65A). {224} It represents, in fact, that

portion of the nodoid, which in Fig. 66 lies between such points as O,

P. While it is easy to

[Illustration: Fig. 66.]

draw the outline, or meridional section, of the nodoid (as in Fig.

66), it is obvious that the solid of revolution to be derived from

it, can never be realised in its entirety: for one part of the solid

figure would cut, or entangle with, another. All that we can ever do,

accordingly, is to realise isolated portions of the nodoid.

If, in a sequel to the preceding experiment of Plateau’s, we use

solid discs instead of annuli, so as to enable us to exert direct

mechanical pressure upon our globule of oil, we again begin by

adjusting the pressure of these discs so that the oil assumes the form

of a cylinder: our discs, that is to say, are adjusted to exercise

a mechanical pressure equal to what in the former case was supplied

by the surface-tension of the spherical caps or ends of the bubble.

If we now increase the pressure slightly, the peripheral walls will

become convexly curved, exercising a precisely corresponding pressure.

Under these circumstances the form assumed by the sides of our figure

will be that of a portion of an unduloid. If we increase the pressure

between the discs, the peripheral surface of oil will bulge out more

and more, and will presently constitute a portion of a sphere. But we

may continue the process yet further, and within certain limits we

shall find that the system remains perfectly stable. What is this new

curved surface which has arisen out of the sphere, as the latter was

produced from the unduloid? It is no other than a portion of a nodoid,

that part which in Fig. 66 lies between such limits as M and N. But

this surface, which is concave in both directions towards the surface

of the oil within, is exerting a pressure upon the latter, just as did

the sphere out of which a moment ago it was transformed; and we had

just stated, in considering the previous experiment, that the pressure

inwards exerted by the nodoid was a negative one. The explanation of

this seeming discrepancy lies in the simple fact that, if we follow the

outline {225} of our nodoid curve in Fig. 66 from O, P, the surface

concerned in the former case, to M, N, that concerned in the present,

we shall see that in the two experiments the surface of the liquid is

not homologous, but lies on the positive side of the curve in the one

case and on the negative side in the other.

――――――――――

Of all the surfaces which we have been describing, the sphere is the

only one which can enclose space; the others can only help to do so, in

combination with one another or with the sphere itself. Thus we have

seen that, in normal equilibrium, the cylindrical vesicle is closed at

either end by a portion of a sphere, and so on. Moreover the sphere is

not only the only one of our figures which can enclose a finite space;

it is also, of all possible figures, that which encloses the greatest

volume with the least area of surface; it is strictly and absolutely

the surface of minimal area, and it is therefore the form which will be

naturally assumed by a unicellular organism (just as by a raindrop),

when it is practically homogeneous and when, like Orbulina floating

in the ocean, its surroundings are likewise practically homogeneous

and symmetrical. It is only relatively speaking that all the rest are

surfaces _minimae areae_; they are so, that is to say, under the given

conditions, which involve various forms of pressure or restraint. Such

restraints are imposed, for instance, by the pipes or annuli with the

help of which we draw out our cylindrical or unduloid oil-globule or

soap-bubble; and in the case of the organic cell, similar restraints

are constantly supplied by solidification, partial or complete, local

or general, of the cell-wall.

Before we pass to biological illustrations of our surface-tension

figures, we have still another preliminary matter to deal with. We have

seen from our description of two of Plateau’s classical experiments,

that at some particular point one type of surface gives place to

another; and again, we know that, when we draw out our soap-bubble into

and then beyond a cylinder, there comes a certain definite point at

which our bubble breaks in two, and leaves us with two bubbles of which

each is a sphere, or a portion of a sphere. In short there are certain

definite limits to the _dimensions_ of our figures, within which limits

equilibrium is stable but at which it becomes unstable, and above which

it {226} breaks down. Moreover in our composite surfaces, when the

cylinder for instance is capped by two spherical cups or lenticular

discs, there is a well-defined ratio which regulates their respective

curvatures, and therefore their respective dimensions. These two

matters we may deal with together.

Let us imagine a liquid drop which by appropriate conditions has

been made to assume the form of a cylinder; we have already seen

that its ends will be terminated by portions of spheres. Since one

and the same liquid film covers the sides and ends of the drop (or

since one and the same delicate membrane encloses the sides and ends

of the cell), we assume the surface-tension (_T_) to be everywhere

identical; and it follows, since the internal fluid-pressure is also

everywhere identical, that the expression (1/_R_ + 1/_R′_) for the

cylinder is equal to the corresponding expression, which we may call

(1/_r_ + 1/_r′_), in the case of the terminal spheres. But in the

cylinder 1/_R′_ = 0, and in the sphere 1/_r_ = 1/_r′_. Therefore our

relation of equality becomes 1/_R_ = 2/_r_, or _r_ = 2 _R_; that is to

say, the sphere in question has just twice the radius of the cylinder

of which it forms a cap.

[Illustration: Fig. 67.]

And if _Ob_, the radius of the sphere, be equal to twice the radius

(_Oa_) of the cylinder, it follows that the angle _aOb_ is an angle of

60°, and _bOc_ is also an angle of 60°; that is to say, the arc _bc_

is equal to (1/3) π. In other words, the spherical disc which (under

the given conditions) caps our cylinder, is not a portion taken at

haphazard, but is neither more nor less than that portion of a sphere

which is subtended by a cone of 60°. Moreover, it is plain that the

height of the spherical cap, _de_,

= _Ob_ − _ab_ = _R_ (2 − √3) = 0·27 _R_,

where _R_ is the radius of our cylinder, or one-half the radius of

our spherical cap: in other words the normal height of the spherical

cap over the end of the cylindrical cell is just a very little more

than one-eighth of the diameter of the cylinder, or of the radius of

the {227} sphere. And these are the proportions which we recognise,

under normal circumstances, in such a case as the cylindrical cell of

Spirogyra where its free end is capped by a portion of a sphere.

――――――――――

Among the many important theoretical discoveries which we owe to

Plateau, one to which we have just referred is of peculiar importance:

namely that, with the exception of the sphere and the plane, the

surfaces with which we have been dealing are only in complete

equilibrium within certain dimensional limits, or in other words, have

a certain definite limit of stability; only the plane and the sphere,

or any portions of a sphere, are perfectly stable, because they are

perfectly symmetrical, figures. For experimental demonstration, the

case of the cylinder is the simplest. If we produce a liquid film

having the form of a cylinder, either by

[Illustration: Fig. 68.]

drawing out a bubble or by supporting between two rings a globule of

oil, the experiment proceeds easily until the length of the cylinder

becomes just about three times as great as its diameter. But somewhere

about this limit the cylinder alters its form; it begins to narrow at

the waist, so passing into an unduloid, and the deformation progresses

quickly until at last our cylinder breaks in two, and its two halves

assume a spherical form. It is found, by theoretical considerations,

that the precise limit of stability is at the point when the length

of the cylinder is exactly equal to its circumference, that is to

say, when _L_ = 2π_R_, or when the ratio of length to diameter is

represented by π.

In the case of the catenoid, Plateau’s experimental procedure was

as follows. To support his globule of oil (in, as usual, a mixture

of alcohol and water of its own specific gravity), he used {228}

a pair of metal rings, which happened to have a diameter of 71

millimetres; and, in a series of experiments, he set these rings

apart at distances of 55, 49, 47, 45, and 43 mm. successively. In

each case he began by bringing his oil-globule into a cylindrical

form, by sucking superfluous oil out of the drop until this result was

attained; and always, for the reason with which we are now acquainted,

the cylindrical sides were associated with spherical ends to the

cylinder. On continuing to withdraw oil in the hope of converting

these spherical ends into planes, he found, naturally, that the sides

of the cylinder drew in to form a concave surface; but it was by no

means easy to get the extremities actually plane: and unless they

were so, thus indicating that the surface-pressure of the drop was

nil, the curvature of the sides could not be that of a catenoid. For

in the first experiment, when the rings were 55 mm. apart, as soon

as the convexity of the ends was to a certain extent diminished, it

spontaneously increased again; and the transverse constriction of the

globule correspondingly deepened, until at a certain point equilibrium

set in anew. Indeed, the more oil he removed, the more convex became

the ends, until at last the increasing transverse constriction led to

the breaking of the oil-globule into two. In the third experiment,

when the rings were 47 mm. apart, it was easy to obtain end-surfaces

that were actually plane, and they remained so even though more oil

was withdrawn, the transverse constriction deepening accordingly. Only

after a considerable amount of oil had been sucked up did the plane

terminal surface become gradually convex, and presently the narrow

waist, narrowing more and more, broke across in the usual way. Finally

in the fifth experiment, where the rings were still nearer together,

it was again possible to bring the ends of the oil-globule to a plane

surface, as in the third and fourth experiments, and to keep this

surface plane in spite of some continued withdrawal of oil. But very

soon the ends became gradually concave, and the concavity deepened as

more and more oil was withdrawn, until at a certain limit, the whole

oil-globule broke up in general disruption.

We learn from this that the limiting size of the catenoid was reached

when the distance of the supporting rings was to their diameter as 47

to 71, or, as nearly as possible, as two to three; {229} and as a

matter of fact it can be shewn that 2/3 is the true theoretical value.

Above this limit of 2/3, the inevitable convexity of the end-surfaces

shows that a positive pressure inwards is being exerted by the surface

film, and this teaches us that the sides of the figure actually

constitute not a catenoid but an unduloid, whose spontaneous changes

tend to a form of greater stability. Below the 2/3 limit the catenoid

surface is essentially unstable, and the form into which it passes

under certain conditions of disturbance such as that of the excessive

withdrawal of oil, is that of a nodoid (Fig. 65A).

The unduloid has certain peculiar properties as regards its limitations

of stability. But as to these we need mention two facts only: (1)

that when the unduloid, which we produce with our soap-bubble or our

oil-globule, consists of the figure containing a complete constriction,

it has somewhat wide limits of stability; but (2) if it contain the

swollen portion, then equilibrium is limited to the condition that the

figure consists simply of one complete unduloid, that is to say that

its ends are constituted by the narrowest portions, and its middle by

the widest portion of the entire curve. The theoretical proof of this

latter fact is difficult, but if we take the proof for granted, the

fact will serve to throw light on what we have learned regarding the

stability of the cylinder. For, when we remember that the meridional

section of our unduloid is generated by the rolling of an ellipse upon

a straight line in its own plane, we shall easily see that the length

of the entire unduloid is equal to the circumference of the generating

ellipse. As the unduloid becomes less and less sinuous in outline, it

gradually approaches, and in time reaches, the form of a cylinder;

and correspondingly, the ellipse which generated it has its foci more

and more approximated until it passes into a circle. The cylinder

of a length equal to the circumference of its generating circle is

therefore precisely homologous to an unduloid whose length is equal to

the circumference of its generating ellipse; and this is just what we

recognise as constituting one complete segment of the unduloid.

――――――――――

While the figures of equilibrium which are at the same time surfaces

of revolution are only six in number, there is an infinite {230}

number of figures of equilibrium, that is to say of surfaces of

constant mean curvature, which are not surfaces of revolution; and it

can be shewn mathematically that any given contour can be occupied

by a finite portion of some one such surface, in stable equilibrium.

The experimental verification of this theorem lies in the simple fact

(already noted) that however we may bend a wire into a closed curve,

plane or not plane, we may always, under appropriate precautions, fill

the entire area with an unbroken film.

Of the regular figures of equilibrium, that is to say surfaces of

constant mean curvature, apart from the surfaces of revolution which

we have discussed, the helicoid spiral is the most interesting to

the biologist. This is a helicoid generated by a straight line

perpendicular to an axis, about which it turns at a uniform rate while

at the same time it slides, also uniformly, along this same axis. At

any point in this surface, the curvatures are equal and of opposite

sign, and the sum of the curvatures is accordingly nil. Among what are

called “ruled surfaces” (which we may describe as surfaces capable of

being defined by a system of stretched strings), the plane and the

helicoid are the only two whose mean curvature is null, while the

cylinder is the only one whose curvature is finite and constant. As

this simplest of helicoids corresponds, in three dimensions, to what

in two dimensions is merely a plane (the latter being generated by

the rotation of a straight line about an axis without the superadded

gliding motion which generates the helicoid), so there are other and

much more complicated helicoids which correspond to the sphere, the

unduloid and the rest of our figures of revolution, the generating

planes of these latter being supposed to wind spirally about an axis.

In the case of the cylinder it is obvious that the resulting figure is

indistinguishable from the cylinder itself. In the case of the unduloid

we obtain a grooved spiral, such as we may meet with in nature (for

instance in Spirochætes, _Bodo gracilis_, etc.), and which accordingly

it is of interest to us to be able to recognise as a surface of minimal

area or constant curvature.

The foregoing considerations deal with a small part only of the

theory of surface tension, or of capillarity: with that part, namely,

which relates to the forms of surface which are {231} capable of

subsisting in equilibrium under the action of that force, either of

itself or subject to certain simple constraints. And as yet we have

limited ourselves to the case of a single surface, or of a single

drop or bubble, leaving to another occasion a discussion of the forms

assumed when such drops or vesicles meet and combine together. In

short, what we have said may help us to understand the form of a

_cell_,—considered, as with certain limitations we may legitimately

consider it, as a liquid drop or liquid vesicle; the conformation of a

_tissue_ or cell-aggregate must be dealt with in the light of another

series of theoretical considerations. In both cases, we can do no more

than touch upon the fringe of a large and difficult subject. There are

many forms capable of realisation under surface tension, and many of

them doubtless to be recognised among organisms, which we cannot touch

upon in this elementary account. The subject is a very general one;

it is, in its essence, more mathematical than physical; it is part of

the mathematics of surfaces, and only comes into relation with surface

tension, because this physical phenomenon illustrates and exemplifies,

in a concrete way, most of the simple and symmetrical conditions

with which the general mathematical theory is capable of dealing.

And before we pass to illustrate by biological examples the physical

phenomena which we have described, we must be careful to remember

that the physical conditions which we have hitherto presupposed will

never be wholly realised in the organic cell. Its substance will

never be a perfect fluid, and hence equilibrium will be more or less

slowly reached; its surface will seldom be perfectly homogeneous,

and therefore equilibrium will (in the fluid condition) seldom be

perfectly attained; it will very often, or generally, be the seat of

other forces, symmetrical or unsymmetrical; and all these causes will

more or less perturb the effects of surface tension acting by itself.

But we shall find that, on the whole, these effects of surface tension

though modified are not obliterated nor even masked; and accordingly

the phenomena to which I have devoted the foregoing pages will be found

manifestly recurring and repeating themselves among the phenomena of

the organic cell.

――――――――――

In a spider’s web we find exemplified several of the principles {232}

of surface tension which we have now explained. The thread is formed

out of the fluid secretion of a gland, and issues from the body as

a semi-fluid cylinder, that is to say in the form of a surface of

equilibrium, the force of expulsion giving it its elongation and that

of surface tension giving it its circular section. It is prevented,

by almost immediate solidification on exposure to the air, from

breaking up into separate drops or spherules, as it would otherwise

tend to do as soon as the length of the cylinder had passed its limit

of stability. But it is otherwise with the sticky secretion which,

coming from another gland, is simultaneously poured over the issuing

thread when it is to form the spiral portion of the web. This latter

secretion is more fluid than the first, and retains its fluidity for

a very much longer time, finally drying up after several hours. By

capillarity it “wets” the thread, spreading itself over it in an even

film, which film is now itself a cylinder. But this liquid cylinder has

its limit of stability when its length equals its own circumference,

and therefore just at the points so defined it tends to disrupt into

separate segments: or rather, in the actual case, at points somewhat

more distant, owing to the imperfect fluidity of the viscous film, and

still more to the frictional drag upon it of the inner solid cylinder,

or thread, with which it is in contact. The cylinder disrupts in the

usual manner, passing first into the wavy outline of an unduloid, whose

swollen portions swell more and more till the contracted parts break

asunder, and we arrive at a series of spherical drops or beads, of

equal size, strung at equal intervals along the thread. If we try to

spread varnish over a thin stretched wire, we produce automatically

the same identical result[288]; unless our varnish be such as to dry

almost instantaneously, it gathers into beads, and do what we can, we

fail to spread it smooth. It follows that, according to the viscidity

and drying power of the varnish, the process may stop or seem to stop

at any point short of the formation of the perfect spherules; it is

quite possible, therefore, that as our final stage we may only obtain

half-formed beads, or the wavy outline of an unduloid. The formation

of the beads may be facilitated or hastened by jerking the stretched

thread, as the spider actually does: the {233} effect of the jerk

being to disturb and destroy the unstable equilibrium of the viscid

cylinder[289]. Another very curious phenomenon here presents itself.

In Plateau’s experimental separation of a cylinder of oil into two

spherical portions, it was noticed that, when contact was nearly

broken, that is to say when the narrow neck of the unduloid had become

very thin, the two spherical bullae, instead of absorbing the fluid out

of the narrow neck into themselves as they had done with the preceding

portion, drew out this small remaining part of the liquid into a

thin thread as they completed their spherical form and consequently

receded from one another: the reason being that, after the thread or

“neck” has reached a certain tenuity, the internal friction of the

fluid prevents or retards its rapid exit from the little thread to the

adjacent spherule. It is for the same reason that we are able to draw

a glass rod or tube, which we have heated in the middle, into a long

and uniform cylinder or thread, by quickly separating the two ends.

But in the case of the glass rod, the long thin intermediate cylinder

quickly cools and solidifies, while in the ordinary separation of a

liquid cylinder the corresponding intermediate cylinder remains liquid;

and therefore, like any other liquid cylinder, it is liable to break

up, provided that its dimensions exceed the normal limit of stability.

And its length is generally such that it breaks at two points, thus

leaving two terminal portions continuous with the spheres and becoming

confluent with these, and one median portion which resolves itself into

a comparatively tiny spherical drop, midway between the original and

larger two. Occasionally, the same process of formation of a connecting

thread repeats itself a second time, between the small intermediate

spherule and the large spheres; and in this case we obviously obtain

two additional spherules, still smaller in size, and lying one on

either side of our first little one. This whole phenomenon, of equal

and regularly interspaced beads, often with little beads regularly

interspaced between the larger ones, and possibly also even a third

series of still smaller beads regularly intercalated, may be easily

observed in a spider’s web, such as that of _Epeira_, very often with

beautiful regularity,—which {234} naturally, however, is sometimes

interrupted and disturbed owing to a slight want of homogeneity

in the secreted fluid; and the same phenomenon is repeated on a

grosser scale when the web is bespangled with dew, and every thread

bestrung with pearls innumerable. To the older naturalists, these

regularly arranged and beautifully formed globules on the spider’s

web were a cause of great wonder and admiration. Blackwall, counting

some twenty globules in a tenth of an inch, calculated that a large

garden-spider’s web comprised about 120,000 globules; the net was

spun and finished in about forty minutes, and Blackwall was evidently

filled with astonishment at the skill and quickness with which the

spider manufactured these little beads. And no wonder, for according

to the above estimate they had to be made at the rate of about 50 per

second[290].

[Illustration: Fig. 69. Hair of _Trianea_, in glycerine. (After

Berthold.)]

The little delicate beads which stud the long thin pseudopodia of a

foraminifer, such as _Gromia_, or which in like manner appear upon the

cylindrical film of protoplasm which covers the long radiating spicules

of _Globigerina_, represent an identical phenomenon. Indeed there are

many cases, in which we may study in a protoplasmic filament the whole

process of formation of such beads. If we squeeze out on to a slide

the viscid contents of a mistletoe berry, the long sticky threads

into which the substance runs shew the whole phenomenon particularly

well. Another way to demonstrate it was noticed many years ago by

Hofmeister and afterwards explained by Berthold. The hairs of certain

water-plants, such as Hydrocharis or Trianea, constitute very long

cylindrical cells, the protoplasm being supported, and maintained in

equilibrium by its contact with the cell-wall. But if we immerse the

filament in some dense fluid, a little sugar-solution for instance,

or dilute glycerine, the cell-sap tends to diffuse outwards, the

protoplasm parts company with its surrounding and supporting wall,

{235} and lies free as a protoplasmic cylinder in the interior of

the cell. Thereupon it immediately shews signs of instability, and

commences to disrupt. It tends to gather into spheres, which however,

as in our illustration, may be prevented by their narrow quarters from

assuming the complete spherical form; and in between these spheres,

we have more or less regularly alternate ones, of smaller size[291].

Similar, but less regular, beads or droplets may be caused to appear,

under stimulation by an alternating current, in the protoplasmic

threads within the living cells of the hairs of Tradescantia. The

explanation usually given is, that the viscosity of the protoplasm is

reduced, or its fluidity increased; but an increase of the surface

tension would seem a more likely reason[292].

[Illustration: Fig. 70. Phases of a Splash. (From Worthington.)]

――――――――――

We may take note here of a remarkable series of phenomena, which,

though they seem at first sight to be of a very different order, are

closely related to the phenomena which attend and which bring about the

breaking-up of a liquid cylinder or thread.

In some of Mr Worthington’s most beautiful experiments on {236}

splashes, it was found that the fall of a round pebble into water from

a considerable height, caused the rise of a filmy sheet of water in the

form of a cup or cylinder; and the edge of this cylindrical film tended

to be cut up into alternate lobes and notches, and the prominent lobes

or “jets” tended, in more extreme cases, to break off or to break up

into spherical beads (Fig. 70)[293]. A precisely similar appearance is

seen, on a great scale, in the thin edge of a breaking wave: when the

smooth cylindrical edge, at a given moment, shoots out an array of tiny

jets which break up into the droplets which constitute “spray” (Fig.

71, _a_, _b_). We are at once reminded of the beautifully symmetrical

notching on the calycles of many hydroids, which little cups before

they became stiff and rigid had begun their existence as liquid or

semi-liquid films.

[Illustration: Fig. 71. A breaking wave. (From Worthington.)]

The phenomenon is two-fold. In the first place, the edge of our tubular

or crater-like film forms a liquid ring or annulus, which is closely

comparable with the liquid thread or cylinder which we have just been

considering, if only we conceive the thread to be bent round into the

ring. And accordingly, just as the thread spontaneously segments, first

into an unduloid, and then into separate spherical drops, so likewise

will the edge of our annulus tend to do. This phase of notching,

or beading, of the edge of the film is beautifully seen in many of

Worthington’s experiments[294]. In the second place, the very fact of

the rising of the crater means that liquid is flowing up from below

towards the rim; and the segmentation of the rim means that channels

of easier flow are {237} created, along which the liquid is led, or

is driven, into the protuberances: and these are thus exaggerated into

the jets or arms which are sometimes so conspicuous at the edge of the

crater. In short, any film or film-like cup, fluid or semi-fluid in its

consistency, will, like the straight liquid cylinder, be unstable: and

its instability will manifest itself (among other ways) in a tendency

to segmentation or notching of the edge; and just such a peripheral

notching is a conspicuous feature of many minute organic cup-like

structures. In the case of the hydroid calycle (Fig. 72), we are led to

the conclusion that the two common and conspicuous features of notching

or indentation of the cup, and of constriction or annulation of the

long cylindrical stem, are phenomena of the same order and are due to

surface-tension in both cases alike.

On Growth and Form · 第 6 / 23 章