Thomas would not believe in the risen Christ because risen Christs

were not a part of the universe as he had plotted it. The other

disciples did believe in a risen Christ because they were large

enough to be able to think farther than they could think clearly,

and because they were able to push the chariot of their convictions

over a road that had not been logically paved. And undoubtedly when

Thomas did finally accept Christ it was not because he had reasoned

Him out in his mind nor fingered Him out by pressing his hands into

the print of the nails, but because of having had divinely wrought

in him a capacity for larger persuasions than his mental and moral

contractedness had been hitherto able to accommodate.

And that is still the way in which we have to acquire the art of

great believing, the art of immense assurance of faith and the

triumphant joy that is bound to go along with it. A world that is

only large enough to contain our petty employments, or to contain

our small pleasures and paltry lusts, is not a world big enough

to have room in it for a human Son of God or for His immortal

escape from the tomb. We might convert our Church into an Easter

conservatory and crowd floor, galleries and chancel with a chorus of

as many angels as heralded the advent, and all of this be a splendid

tribute to the Lord of the resurrection and a splendid memorial

of the great Easter event, but the prime point of all is for us

each inwardly to grow to the proportions of so august an event, to

be inwardly equal to the cordial and settled entertainment of so

thrilling a thought, to have created in us such a sense of vast

spiritual territory margining this small world of commonplace, as

will give abundant space for transactions conducted on so large a

scale as that of the marvelous birth, the death in whose presence

the sun was darkened, and the great rising from the grave that broke

down the walls between this world and the other, converted the

coffin into a cradle of life eternal, and swung wide the doors of

paradise.

It is our prayer that the wide view opened before us by this

memorial season may stimulate us to higher levels of thought;

create for us a world too large to be filled with the small and

passing interests and commonplace incidents of life; destroy for

us in that way the obstinacy of antecedent objection; mental

reluctance and moral antagonism be dissolved in the warm light of

the larger prospect, till we become able to recognize Jesus in the

gracious face and scarred figure; and in the cordiality of complete

conviction to echo the words of the persuaded Thomas, "My Lord and

my God."

PATTON

GLORIFICATION THROUGH DEATH

BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE

FRANCIS LANDEY PATTON, Presbyterian minister and educator, was

born in Bermuda in 1843. He studied at Knox College, Toronto, and

Princeton Seminary, New Jersey. From 1865 to 1871 he held many

pastorates, but in the latter year his work as a controversialist

and educator began. He took a prominent part in the ecclesiastical

trials of Prof. David Swing and Dr. C. A. Briggs, and was elected

to succeed Dr. McCosh in the presidency of Princeton in 1888, but

resigned in 1902, after which he was elected president of the

Princeton Seminary. He is a deep thinker and dialectician, and

a vigorous speaker on the theological subjects in which he is

interested.

PATTON

Born in 1843

GLORIFICATION THROUGH DEATH[4]

[4] Copyright, 1905, by _The Homiletic Review, New York_.

_Verily, verily, I say unto you, except a corn of wheat fall

into the ground and die, it abideth alone; but if it die, it

bringeth forth much fruit._--John xii., 24.

We all know that it was necessary for Christ to die, and that his

path lay through the valley of the shadow of death. I do not take

this text to illustrate this idea, but to concern myself with a

line of illustration which has no reference to His death, and so

will avoid the suggestion. We have here, in the first place, the

enunciation of a principle which goes far toward unifying the moral

and spiritual history of our world. Glorification through death is

a principle that may be seen in various spheres of observation,

and in the relation of the individual to the race. For instance, a

man of ordinary education has a family of boys and girls. He has

reached that time of life, the sure sign of middle age, perhaps a

little beyond, when he ceased to raise the question that he has

been raising about himself, How shall I make the best of myself?

and he begins to raise the question-the only question he thinks of

after that--What shall I do for them? "Well," he says, "I had but

a limited education; they shall have the best the country can give

or they are willing to take. I had but few opportunities; there is

no lack of opportunity for them. I had many a rough encounter when

I first set out in the world; they shall have the advantage of my

accumulated earnings to set them up in life."

Sure enough, the boys grow up and fill positions that the father and

mother did not fill, and could not fill; and by and by they all come

home again, and as they look on the dead man's face they say, or

rather they seem to say, "Father did well by us," and they may very

well say it. His hand had wrought for them; his head had thought

for them; his heart had beat for them; this is the long result--the

father lies in his coffin, and the children go their several ways

in life, and repeat in their own experience the story; and so "the

individual withers, and the world is more and more."

And this principle of glorification through death is illustrated

further in the fact that, when the lower forms of life or

civilization disappear to make room for the higher, the one

dominating phase of the doctrine of evolution is the seeming unity

with which it invests everything; because, imagine it true, and

there at once you see how moving are the poet's words:

I held it truth, with him who sings

To one clear harp in divers tones,

That men may rise on stepping-stones

Of their dead selves to higher things.

This is the story not of the potential, but of the actual. And

what is true of the material world is true of the spiritual world.

The history of the spiritual world is a history of displacement.

You may account for it by the love of glory or by the sentiment of

revenge, but we know that God's glory is the final cause, and it

is all explicable upon the great scale of divine providence. We

all understand that there is a definite relationship between our

present and the past, and that we to-day are the heirs of all that

civilization that has gone. Our acts are the result of all that has

gone before. They were the seed and we are the harvest: "Except a

corn of wheat fall into the earth and die, it abideth alone; but

if it die, it bringeth forth much fruit." The mass of this early

civilization survives in the civilization of to-day. Where do you go

to find the origin of the great principle of civil liberty? Where

do you go, but to that crowd of sturdy peoples who lived along the

banks of the Rhine, and whom Tacitus describes, or to those sturdy

barons at Runnymede who extorted the Magna Charta from King John? It

is just as true in the sphere of science or philosophy. It is a far

cry back to Thales of Miletus, and yet our own boasted century, the

nineteenth, and this which may have boasts of its own, has a close

relation to the civilization of the very far past. Our astronomy

is different from their astrology, and our chemistry is different

from their alchemy, but they are closely associated. We see further

than they did sometimes, just because we are as pigmies borne on the

shoulders of a giant.

This principle of glorification through death is illustrated once

more in that a new and expanded form of life is the fruit of death.

Take the railroad at the proper season of the year, and see the

corn standing as a dazzling glory in the fertile fields of the

golden West. Mark how towers herald the approach to the towns and

cities, and ask what they stand there for? These are the nation's

treasure-houses. These are the storehouses of the world. This is the

annual coronation of nature, and simply so many illustrations of

the text: "Except a corn of wheat fall into the earth and die, it

abideth alone; but if it die it bringeth forth much fruit."

Change the illustration and borrow one from the humbler phases of

the animal world, like the caterpillar, which eats up the floor

of the leaf on which it creeps, until, by and by, as it begins to

realize that its life is nearly done, it sets its house in order,

turns undertaker, weaves itself a silken shroud, and awaits the

dawning of its resurrection day, and soars away a bright-winged

butterfly--a beautiful illustration of the text: "Except a corn of

wheat fall into the earth and die, it abideth alone; but if it die,

it bringeth forth much fruit." That is the story of our life. We are

born, and we grow; we go on our way, renew our infancy with impaired

faculties, and then we pass away. Life is a battle, and we win our

greatest victory when we lie down on that battle-field and die. Life

is a race, and the goal is at the grave. Life is a journey, and the

path that we take lies straight for the valley of the shadow of

death. The valley is dark, but beyond the darkness and across the

river I see the lights of the celestial city; I get an echo of the

angels' song, and the glimpse that I get tells me that it is worth

all it costs to die.

The principle of glorification through death is illustrated in the

death of Judaism. Judaism was a divinely founded institution--a

theological seminary. The purpose of it was to disseminate the

knowledge of the one living and true God. With the approach of the

pagan world and Christianity it gathered up its energies to give

birth to Jesus of Nazareth. That is what it existed for; and in

the throes of the birth-struggle Judaism died. Let us not speak

reproachfully of Judaism, for the glory of Christianity is the glory

of Judaism with an added glory: "Except a corn of wheat fall into

the earth and die, it abideth alone; but if it die, it bringeth

forth fruit."

Once more (for this is our Lord's own illustration concerning

Himself), the principle of glorification through death is

illustrated in the death and resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ

Himself. We see Jesus made a little lower than the angels and

crowned with glory and honor. He suffered that we might conquer.

He drank the bitter cup in order that we might taste something of

the sweetness of the joys of His Father's house. He has settled the

question of His own place, and of our place too, in the scale of

being. The question whether the finite and the infinite can ever

come together has been solved in the doctrine of the incarnation. We

do not want any more to sing the old song, which never amounted to

very much in the way of music or poetry:

I want to be an angel,

And with the angels stand,

A crown upon my forehead,

A harp within my hand.

We do not want anything of the sort. Angels never rise so high nor

stand so low as man. They know nothing about sin or repentance or

salvation through Jesus Christ, and are not worthy to sit with Him

who judges the ten tribes of Israel.

This text not only fastens on us this principle of glorification

through death, but, in the second place, it gives us a twofold

vindication of death, the first being the perils of survivorship,

and the second being the promise of grace. Death is one of the most

philosophical things in the world; and if you put yourselves in

the right attitude toward it, it is one of the kindest agencies in

nature. There is such a thing as a time to die; for two reasons at

least.

One is the solitude of old age--the peril of survivorship--"Except

a corn of wheat fall into the ground and die, it abideth alone";

it abideth alone. You can imagine a person very old. His eyes have

grown dim. Generations have grown old and died, but he still lives

on. He is too old to take kindly to the new ideas, or to see much

reason for the changes taking place. He is too old to have an

interest in the present, too old to have any friends, and at last

he lives, and lives, and lives, until he seems like a monumental

intrusion into the present, an object that people stop to look at

when they are in a reflective mood and wish to mark the flight of

years. Who would not court a new-made grave rather than risk the

perils of survivorship?

Then there is the promise of grace. Our blest Lord hallowed the

grave by His presence, and left it upon the morning of the third

day. The promise of Christ gives us a connection with His own

glorious resurrection; and planted with Him in His death, we shall

be with Him in His glory. And so the message comes to you and to

me: Be not afraid. Do not hesitate to go down, even into the

grave. Our Lord has not made it unnecessary for us to die, but He

has robbed death of its terrors. He has made easy the approach; He

has festooned the entrance with flowers; and we ride through its

portals, singing as we go, "O grave, where is thy victory? O death,

where is thy sting?" and we turn to discover that the door of death

is the gate of heaven.

Again, this text teaches one other truth. As we read it, we can not

very well help being imprest with the idea that there is embodied

in it the thought that there are two contrasted modes of being: a

fruitless conservation and a prolific decay. The seed corn is very

tenacious of life, and there is a story that grains taken from an

Egyptian mummy have been planted and have germinated in English

gardens. I believe that this is not so, but the tenacity of wheat

in respect to life is true. It abideth; but it abideth alone.

Let it reproduce itself, and by and by there will be enough of

harvest to feed a nation. We must make a choice between a fruitless

conservation and prolific decay. And this choice comes to us in

so many ways. We see it in the sphere of prejudice. Prejudice is

often, but it is not always, right. It is very often misplaced or

perpetuated beyond a time when it does any good. (You never find

a man cherishing a prejudice, because he says he is "standing up

for a principle.") It was good enough when he started; it served

its purpose at first; but it has outlived its usefulness, and is

now just a prejudice. A good many years ago, at the foundation of

the London Missionary Society, a speaker said, "We stand to-day at

the funeral of bigotry." There is not a word of objection to that,

except that these obsequies have been so unduly protracted. God send

the day when men shall recognize the lineament of Jesus Christ in

one another's face, whether they be Presbyterians, Episcopalians,

or what! And this principle, this choice, whether there shall be a

conservation that is fruitless, or an expenditure that is generous,

meets us everywhere. It meets us in our relationship to the past.

There is a sort of medievalism cherished and fostered by some

people with an odor of sanctity--they love things which are old.

And there is a vandalism that destroys the old, and worships the

new, because it is new. My friends, they are both wrong. Let us look

at our inheritance of the past in proof of this. Hold fast to that

which is true, and do not hold anything that is not. Read the great

formularies of worship with the critical light of modern thought,

and hold on to that which is true. The Jerusalem Chamber is not holy

ground, the Westminster divines were not inspired. If they said what

was true, it is because of the truth of what they say that we hold

on to it, not because they said it. And what is true in regard

to these formulas holds true in reference to our own individual

life. But there are times, I suppose, when people who live in a

city as busy as this is, and where the engagements of the week run

over into two weeks, and where every hour has its own employment,

there are times, I suppose, even here that people have leisure to

sit still while the fire burns; and in these choice stolen hours,

I suppose, figures of long ago come out upon the canvas, and stand

there in bold relief; and we say that they were happy days. Imagine

that dear old room, and those pictures of long ago coming before

us, when our imagination was all aglow. I can imagine that the

door-bell might ring, and that one of those that we have not seen

for fifty years was announced. I can imagine the conversation that

would ensue. We would talk excitedly for twenty minutes, and then

the conversation would flag, and before the hour was up we would be

completely disillusioned, and would see that our paths had diverged.

All that sort of thing was good in its way and time, but it is not

the time for it now. Of course, we must have a foundation for the

house. Still we do not live in the cellar. We live upstairs in the

sunlight, and experience says we do well. These past incidents of

life are just the foundation, and it is the superstructure after

all that you build upon; and unless a man is willing to part with

the past, he is going to make a mistake. Unless we learn to do

better to-day the things that we did yesterday, and paint a better

picture to-day, and write a better poem than the last, and are

more proficient in our arts, we are just as good as dead. We are

eternally improving and moving on. There is a conservation, stedfast

and still; and there is a forgetfulness and a generous prodigality

of past attainments that is prolific of vast results. There is

your health. What are you going to do with it? You had better wear

out than rust out any day. You can see people who make themselves

obnoxious to you by their everlasting attitude of complaint. There

is something better for a man to do than to take care of his health,

and he will probably live longer if he does not. Is a man who has

an intellect expected to have nothing better to do than to play

nurse to his body that he has to summer in the North, and winter

in the South, and to clothe with purple and fine linen, and fare

sumptuously every day, and give it now and then a trip to Europe--a

body that is bound to die? There is your life. What are you going

to do with it? There is your money. What are you going to do with

it? Why, invest it, and be careful about your security, and don't be

careful about the interest, and keep on investing and reinvesting,

until it will take the figures of astronomy to count it. As fortunes

go now, astronomy is not in it. Invest it, and then what do you

do? There are so many things that some people might do and do do,

that so many more people might do. They might perpetuate their

names by doing something for the Church, for education, and for the

world, and its moral, spiritual, and intellectual advance. God be

praised for this! You, who have cast your bread of benevolence upon

the waters of Christian philanthropy hope that you will receive it

after many days. This world's history shows that our forests have

not been cleared by the brawn of men who lived in comfortable homes.

How have our liberties been secured? By the blood of men who counted

no service too great. Can we do that? William of Orange might have

lived a long life, but he stript himself of land and fortune, and

planted himself in deadly opposition to Alva, and died a monument

to the fall of Spanish tyranny. Yes, my friends, in humbler spheres

it is your privilege, and mine, in the house of this tabernacle, to

choose between the alternative of a conservation which is fruitless

and an expenditure that is substantial, generous, and prodigal. It

is a choice for us to make. Wrap yourselves in your mummy folds, and

live for yourself or, in generous forgetfulness, live for God and

country, and for fellow men while you live, and when the hour comes,

without fear, if need be, drop into the ground and die.

Help us, O Lord, to endure as good soldiers of Jesus Christ. Help

us to do our duty so completely that every day we do better and

become better and be with Christ. Help us that we may be ready for

death, and in that last encounter may be as brave as in all the

other encounters of our lives. Give us this faith to the end. For

Christ's sake. Amen.

SCOTT HOLLAND

THE STORY OF A DISCIPLE'S FAITH

BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE

HENRY SCOTT HOLLAND, English clergyman and author, was born at

Wimbledon in 1847. He was educated at Eton and Oxford, at which

university he was distinguished for learning and character. In

1844 he was appointed Canon of St. Paul's Cathedral, London. He

has published "Logic and Life"; "Creed and Character," and other

volumes.

SCOTT HOLLAND

Born in 1847

THE STORY OF A DISCIPLE'S FAITH

_Then went in also that other disciple which came first to the

sepulchre, and he saw and believed._--John xx., 8.

John, the beloved disciple, has given his witness, has made his

confession. What he once touched, and tasted, and handled, that he

has declared unto us. It was the shining, the epiphany of God the

Father which he and the twelve had discovered, tabernacled close

at their side in the body of Christ. "We saw his glory, the glory

as of God himself." So he pronounces. Yet still his listeners sit

on about his feet. They hear great words, but these words are the

end of a long and anxious meditation. The apostle is giving us, is

giving them his completed conclusions--yes, and they have accepted

the conclusions; they hold them fast. But it is not enough to know

what they ought to believe, tho that is much--they must also know

the process by which the conclusion is to be reached. They must

reproduce in themselves the living story of its formation. They

must be conscious of its stages, its degrees, and its growth. They

can not surely be as reapers entering into the labors of others

who went forth weeping with good seed. They must feel their own

faith grow, first the blade, then the ear, and so at last, in ample

richness, the full corn in the ear; and therefore they went on

wondering. "Let us hear it all," they say; "tell us of that day when

first it came to you that something wonderful was there. Tell us

how you slowly learned the great mystery; and then tell us when and

how it was that the full truth broke from your heart and from your

lips. Tell us this, that so we, too, may say with you and with ten

thousand times ten thousand: 'Worthy is the Lamb that was slain.'"

This is the question that St. John sets himself to answer; and you

can see that it is so by this, that he begins his gospel, not with

our Lord's own beginning, the baptism by John, but with the day

on which the disciples began to believe on Him; and he ends it,

not with our Lord's own ending, His ascension, but with the first

completed confession of Jesus by an apostle--the confession of

Thomas. This achieved, his gospel is done; he has nothing to add but

one scene that to him was full of tender personal interest.

The World's Great Sermons, Volume 09: Cuyler to Van Dyke · 第 6 / 12 段