A FOREWORD

_"Nescio quid certè est: et Hylax in limine latrat."_

_A Foreword: Which Asserts Nothing._

In Continental periodicals not more than a dozen articles in all

would seem to have given accounts or partial translations of the

Jurgen legends. No thorough investigation of this epos can be said

to have appeared in print, anywhere, prior to the publication, in

1913, of the monumental _Synopses of Aryan Mythology_ by Angelo

de Ruiz. It is unnecessary to observe that in this exhaustive digest

Professor de Ruiz has given (VII, p. 415 _et sequentia_) a

summary of the greater part of these legends as contained in the

collections of Verville and Bülg; and has discussed at length and

with much learning the esoteric meaning of these folk-stories and

their bearing upon questions to which the "solar theory" of myth

explanation has given rise. To his volumes, and to the pages of Mr.

Lewistam's _Key to the Popular Tales of Poictesme_, must be

referred all those who may elect to think of Jurgen as the

resplendent, journeying and procreative sun.

Equally in reading hereinafter will the judicious waive all

allegorical interpretation, if merely because the suggestions

hitherto advanced are inconveniently various. Thus Verville

finds the Nessus shirt a symbol of retribution, where Bülg,

with rather wide divergence, would have it represent the dangerous

gift of genius. Then it may be remembered that Dr. Codman says,

without any hesitancy, of Mother Sereda: "This Mother Middle is

the world generally (an obvious anagram of _Erda es_), and this

Sereda rules not merely the middle of the working-days but the

midst of everything. She is the factor of _middleness_, of

mediocrity, of an avoidance of extremes, of the eternal compromise

begotten by use and wont. She is the Mrs. Grundy of the Léshy; she is

Comstockery: and her shadow is common-sense." Yet Codman speaks with

certainly no more authority than Prote, when the latter, in his

_Origins of Fable_, declares this epos is "a parable of ... man's

vain journeying in search of that rationality and justice which his

nature craves, and discovers nowhere in the universe: and the shirt

is an emblem of this instinctive craving, as ... the shadow symbolizes

conscience. Sereda typifies a surrender to life as it is, a giving up

of man's rebellious self-centredness and selfishness: the anagram being

_se dare_."

Thus do interpretations throng and clash, and neatly equal the

commentators in number. Yet possibly each one of these unriddlings,

with no doubt a host of others, is conceivable: so that wisdom will

dwell upon none of them very seriously.

With the origin and the occult meaning of the folklore of Poictesme

this book at least is in no wise concerned: its unambitious aim has

been merely to familiarize English readers with the Jurgen epos for

the tale's sake. And this tale of old years is one which, by rare

fortune, can be given to English readers almost unabridged, in view

of the singular delicacy and pure-mindedness of the Jurgen mythos:

in all, not more than a half-dozen deletions have seemed expedient

(and have been duly indicated) in order to remove such sparse and

unimportant outcroppings of mediæval frankness as might conceivably

offend the squeamish.

Since this volume is presented simply as a story to be read for

pastime, neither morality nor symbolism is hereinafter educed, and

no "parallels" and "authorities" are quoted. Even the gaps are left

unbridged by guesswork: whereas the historic and mythological

problems perhaps involved are relinquished to those really

thoroughgoing scholars whom erudition qualifies to deal with such

topics, and tedium does not deter....

In such terms, and thus far, ran the Foreword to the first issues of

this book, whose later fortunes have made necessary the lengthening

of the Foreword with a postscript. The needed addition--this much at

least chiming with good luck--is brief. It is just that fragment

which some scholars, since the first appearance of this volume, have

asserted--upon what perfect frankness must describe as not

indisputable grounds--to be a portion of the thirty-second chapter

of the complete form of _La Haulte Histoire de Jurgen_.

And in reply to what these scholars assert, discretion says nothing.

For this fragment was, of course, unknown when the High History was

first put into English, and there in consequence appears, here,

little to be won either by endorsing or denying its claims to

authenticity. Rather, does discretion prompt the appending, without

any gloss or scholia, of this fragment, which deals with

_The Judging of Jurgen._

Now a court was held by the Philistines to decide whether or no King

Jurgen should be relegated to limbo. And when the judges were

prepared for judging, there came into the court a great tumblebug,

rolling in front of him his loved and properly housed young ones.

With the creature came pages, in black and white, bearing a sword, a

staff and a lance.

This insect looked at Jurgen, and its pincers rose erect in horror.

The bug cried to the three judges, "Now, by St. Anthony! this Jurgen

must forthwith be relegated to limbo, for he is offensive and lewd

and lascivious and indecent."

"And how can that be?" says Jurgen.

"You are offensive," the bug replied, "because this page has a sword

which I choose to say is not a sword. You are lewd because that page

has a lance which I prefer to think is not a lance. You are

lascivious because yonder page has a staff which I elect to declare

is not a staff. And finally, you are indecent for reasons of which a

description would be objectionable to me, and which therefore I must

decline to reveal to anybody."

"Well, that sounds logical," says Jurgen, "but still, at the same

time, it would be no worse for an admixture of common-sense. For you

gentlemen can see for yourselves, by considering these pages fairly

and as a whole, that these pages bear a sword and a lance and a

staff, and nothing else whatever; and you will deduce, I hope, that

all the lewdness is in the insectival mind of him who itches to be

calling these things by other names."

The judges said nothing as yet. But they that guarded Jurgen, and

all the other Philistines, stood to this side and to that side with

their eyes shut tight, and all these said: "We decline to look at

the pages fairly and as a whole, because to look might seem to imply

a doubt of what the tumblebug has decreed. Besides, as long as the

tumblebug has reasons which he declines to reveal, his reasons stay

unanswerable, and you are plainly a prurient rascal who are making

trouble for yourself."

"To the contrary," says Jurgen, "I am a poet, and I make

literature."

"But in Philistia to make literature and to make trouble for

yourself are synonyms," the tumblebug explained. "I know, for

already we of Philistia have been pestered by three of these makers

of literature. Yes, there was Edgar, whom I starved and hunted until

I was tired of it: then I chased him up a back alley one night, and

knocked out those annoying brains of his. And there was Walt, whom I

chivvied and battered from place to place, and made a paralytic of

him: and him, too, I labelled offensive and lewd and lascivious and

indecent. Then later there was Mark, whom I frightened into

disguising himself in a clown's suit, so that nobody might suspect

him to be a maker of literature: indeed, I frightened him so that he

hid away the greater part of what he had made until after he was

dead, and I could not get at him. That was a disgusting trick to

play on me, I consider. Still, these are the only three detected

makers of literature that have ever infested Philistia, thanks be to

goodness and my vigilance, but for both of which we might have been

no more free from makers of literature than are the other

countries."

"Now, but these three," cried Jurgen, "are the glory of Philistia:

and of all that Philistia has produced, it is these three alone,

whom living ye made least of, that to-day are honored wherever art

is honored, and where nobody bothers one way or the other about

Philistia."

"What is art to me and my way of living?" replied the tumblebug,

wearily. "I have no concern with art and letters and the other lewd

idols of foreign nations. I have in charge the moral welfare of my

young, whom I roll here before me, and trust with St. Anthony's aid

to raise in time to be God-fearing tumblebugs like me, delighting in

what is proper to their nature. For the rest, I have never minded

dead men being well-spoken-of. No, no, my lad: once whatever I may

do means nothing to you, and once you are really rotten, you will

find the tumblebug friendly enough. Meanwhile I am paid to protest

that living persons are offensive and lewd and lascivious and

indecent, and one must live."

Then the Philistines who stood to this side and to that side said in

indignant unison: "And we, the reputable citizenry of Philistia, are

not at all in sympathy with those who would take any protest against

the tumblebug as a justification of what they are pleased to call

art. The harm done by the tumblebug seems to us very slight, whereas

the harm done by the self-styled artist may be very great."

Jurgen now looked more attentively at this queer creature: and he

saw that the tumblebug was malodorous, certainly, but at bottom

honest and well-meaning; and this seemed to Jurgen the saddest thing

he had found among the Philistines. For the tumblebug was sincere in

his insane doings, and all Philistia honored him sincerely, so that

there was nowhere any hope for this people.

Therefore King Jurgen addressed himself, as his need was, to submit

to the strange customs of the Philistines. "Now do you judge me

fairly," cried Jurgen to his judges, "if there be any justice in

this mad country. And if there be none, do you relegate me to limbo

or to any other place, so long as in that place this tumblebug is

not omnipotent and sincere and insane."

And Jurgen waited....

* * * * *

Jurgen: A Comedy of Justice · 第 57 / 119 题