FOURTH LECTURE.

(_Delivered on the 5th of March 1872._)

LADIES AND GENTLEMEN,--Now that you have followed my tale up to this

point, and that we have made ourselves joint masters of the solitary,

remote, and at times abusive duologue of the philosopher and his

companion, I sincerely hope that you, like strong swimmers, are ready

to proceed on the second half of our journey, especially as I can

promise you that a few other marionettes will appear in the

puppet-play of my adventure, and that if up to the present you have

only been able to do little more than endure what I have been telling

you, the waves of my story will now bear you more quickly and easily

towards the end. In other words we have now come to a turning, and it

would be advisable for us to take a short glance backwards to see what

we think we have gained from such a varied conversation.

"Remain in your present position," the philosopher seemed to say to

his companion, "for you may cherish hopes. It is more and more clearly

evident that we have no educational institutions at all; but that we

ought to have them. Our public schools--established, it would seem,

for this high object--have either become the nurseries of a

reprehensible culture which repels the true culture with profound

hatred--_i.e._ a true, aristocratic culture, founded upon a few

carefully chosen minds; or they foster a micrological and sterile

learning which, while it is far removed from culture, has at least

this merit, that it avoids that reprehensible culture as well as the

true culture." The philosopher had particularly drawn his companion's

attention to the strange corruption which must have entered into the

heart of culture when the State thought itself capable of tyrannising

over it and of attaining its ends through it; and further when the

State, in conjunction with this culture, struggled against other

hostile forces as well as against _the_ spirit which the philosopher

ventured to call the "true German spirit." This spirit, linked to the

Greeks by the noblest ties, and shown by its past history to have been

steadfast and courageous, pure and lofty in its aims, its faculties

qualifying it for the high task of freeing modern man from the curse

of modernity--this spirit is condemned to live apart, banished from

its inheritance. But when its slow, painful tones of woe resound

through the desert of the present, then the overladen and gaily-decked

caravan of culture is pulled up short, horror-stricken. We must not

only astonish, but terrify--such was the philosopher's opinion: not to

fly shamefully away, but to take the offensive, was his advice; but he

especially counselled his companion not to ponder too anxiously over

the individual from whom, through a higher instinct, this aversion for

the present barbarism proceeded, "Let it perish: the Pythian god had

no difficulty in finding a new tripod, a second Pythia, so long, at

least, as the mystic cold vapours rose from the earth."

The philosopher once more began to speak: "Be careful to remember, my

friend," said he, "there are two things you must not confuse. A man

must learn a great deal that he may live and take part in the struggle

for existence; but everything that he as an individual learns and does

with this end in view has nothing whatever to do with culture. This

latter only takes its beginning in a sphere that lies far above the

world of necessity, indigence, and struggle for existence. The

question now is to what extent a man values his ego in comparison with

other egos, how much of his strength he uses up in the endeavour to

earn his living. Many a one, by stoically confining his needs within a

narrow compass, will shortly and easily reach the sphere in which he

may forget, and, as it were, shake off his ego, so that he can enjoy

perpetual youth in a solar system of timeless and impersonal things.

Another widens the scope and needs of his ego as much as possible, and

builds the mausoleum of this ego in vast proportions, as if he were

prepared to fight and conquer that terrible adversary, Time. In this

instinct also we may see a longing for immortality: wealth and power,

wisdom, presence of mind, eloquence, a flourishing outward aspect, a

renowned name--all these are merely turned into the means by which an

insatiable, personal will to live craves for new life, with which,

again, it hankers after an eternity that is at last seen to be

illusory.

"But even in this highest form of the ego, in the enhanced needs of

such a distended and, as it were, collective individual, true culture

is never touched upon; and if, for example, art is sought after, only

its disseminating and stimulating actions come into prominence, _i.e._

those which least give rise to pure and noble art, and most of all to

low and degraded forms of it. For in all his efforts, however great

and exceptional they seem to the onlooker, he never succeeds in

freeing himself from his own hankering and restless personality: that

illuminated, ethereal sphere where one may contemplate without the

obstruction of one's own personality continually recedes from him--and

thus, let him learn, travel, and collect as he may, he must always

live an exiled life at a remote distance from a higher life and from

true culture. For true culture would scorn to contaminate itself with

the needy and covetous individual; it well knows how to give the slip

to the man who would fain employ it as a means of attaining to

egoistic ends; and if any one cherishes the belief that he has firmly

secured it as a means of livelihood, and that he can procure the

necessities of life by its sedulous cultivation, then it suddenly

steals away with noiseless steps and an air of derisive mockery.[6]

"I will thus ask you, my friend, not to confound this culture, this

sensitive, fastidious, ethereal goddess, with that useful

maid-of-all-work which is also called 'culture,' but which is only

the intellectual servant and counsellor of one's practical

necessities, wants, and means of livelihood Every kind of training,

however, which holds out the prospect of bread-winning as its end and

aim, is not a training for culture as we understand the word; but

merely a collection of precepts and directions to show how, in the

struggle for existence, a man may preserve and protect his own person.

It may be freely admitted that for the great majority of men such a

course of instruction is of the highest importance; and the more

arduous the struggle is the more intensely must the young man strain

every nerve to utilise his strength to the best advantage.

"But--let no one think for a moment that the schools which urge him on

to this struggle and prepare him for it are in any way seriously to be

considered as establishments of culture. They are institutions which

teach one how to take part in the battle of life; whether they promise

to turn out civil servants, or merchants, or officers, or wholesale

dealers, or farmers, or physicians, or men with a technical training.

The regulations and standards prevailing at such institutions differ

from those in a true educational institution; and what in the latter

is permitted, and even freely held out as often as possible, ought to

be considered as a criminal offence in the former.

"Let me give you an example. If you wish to guide a young man on the

path of true culture, beware of interrupting his naive, confident,

and, as it were, immediate and personal relationship with nature. The

woods, the rocks, the winds, the vulture, the flowers, the butterfly,

the meads, the mountain slopes, must all speak to him in their own

language; in them he must, as it were, come to know himself again in

countless reflections and images, in a variegated round of changing

visions; and in this way he will unconsciously and gradually feel the

metaphysical unity of all things in the great image of nature, and at

the same time tranquillise his soul in the contemplation of her

eternal endurance and necessity. But how many young men should be

permitted to grow up in such close and almost personal proximity to

nature! The others must learn another truth betimes: how to subdue

nature to themselves. Here is an end of this naive metaphysics; and

the physiology of plants and animals, geology, inorganic chemistry,

force their devotees to view nature from an altogether different

standpoint. What is lost by this new point of view is not only a

poetical phantasmagoria, but the instinctive, true, and unique point

of view, instead of which we have shrewd and clever calculations, and,

so to speak, overreachings of nature. Thus to the truly cultured man

is vouchsafed the inestimable benefit of being able to remain

faithful, without a break, to the contemplative instincts of his

childhood, and so to attain to a calmness, unity, consistency, and

harmony which can never be even thought of by a man who is compelled

to fight in the struggle for existence.

"You must not think, however, that I wish to withhold all praise from

our primary and secondary schools: I honour the seminaries where boys

learn arithmetic and master modern languages, and study geography and

the marvellous discoveries made in natural science. I am quite

prepared to say further that those youths who pass through the better

class of secondary schools are well entitled to make the claims put

forward by the fully-fledged public school boy; and the time is

certainly not far distant when such pupils will be everywhere freely

admitted to the universities and positions under the government, which

has hitherto been the case only with scholars from the public

schools--of our present public schools, be it noted![7] I cannot,

however, refrain from adding the melancholy reflection: if it be true

that secondary and public schools are, on the whole, working so

heartily in common towards the same ends, and differ from each other

only in such a slight degree, that they may take equal rank before the

tribunal of the State, then we completely lack another kind of

educational institutions: those for the development of culture! To say

the least, the secondary schools cannot be reproached with this; for

they have up to the present propitiously and honourably followed up

tendencies of a lower order, but one nevertheless highly necessary. In

the public schools, however, there is very much less honesty and very

much less ability too; for in them we find an instinctive feeling of

shame, the unconscious perception of the fact that the whole

institution has been ignominiously degraded, and that the sonorous

words of wise and apathetic teachers are contradictory to the dreary,

barbaric, and sterile reality. So there are no true cultural

institutions! And in those very places where a pretence to culture is

still kept up, we find the people more hopeless, atrophied, and

discontented than in the secondary schools, where the so-called

'realistic' subjects are taught! Besides this, only think how immature

and uninformed one must be in the company of such teachers when one

actually misunderstands the rigorously defined philosophical

expressions 'real' and 'realism' to such a degree as to think them the

contraries of mind and matter, and to interpret 'realism' as 'the road

to knowledge, formation, and mastery of reality.'

"I for my own part know of only two exact contraries: _institutions

for teaching culture and institutions for teaching how to succeed in

life_. All our present institutions belong to the second class; but I

am speaking only of the first."

About two hours went by while the philosophically-minded couple

chatted about such startling questions. Night slowly fell in the

meantime; and when in the twilight the philosopher's voice had sounded

like natural music through the woods, it now rang out in the profound

darkness of the night when he was speaking with excitement or even

passionately; his tones hissing and thundering far down the valley,

and reverberating among the trees and rocks. Suddenly he was silent:

he had just repeated, almost pathetically, the words, "we have no true

educational institutions; we have no true educational institutions!"

when something fell down just in front of him--it might have been a

fir-cone--and his dog barked and ran towards it. Thus interrupted, the

philosopher raised his head, and suddenly became aware of the

darkness, the cool air, and the lonely situation of himself and his

companion. "Well! What are we about!" he ejaculated, "it's dark. You

know whom we were expecting here; but he hasn't come. We have waited

in vain; let us go."

* * * * *

I must now, ladies and gentlemen, convey to you the impressions

experienced by my friend and myself as we eagerly listened to this

conversation, which we heard distinctly in our hiding-place. I have

already told you that at that place and at that hour we had intended

to hold a festival in commemoration of something: and this something

had to do with nothing else than matters concerning educational

training, of which we, in our own youthful opinions, had garnered a

plentiful harvest during our past life. We were thus disposed to

remember with gratitude the institution which we had at one time

thought out for ourselves at that very spot in order, as I have

already mentioned, that we might reciprocally encourage and watch over

one another's educational impulses. But a sudden and unexpected light

was thrown on all that past life as we silently gave ourselves up to

the vehement words of the philosopher. As when a traveller, walking

heedlessly across unknown ground, suddenly puts his foot over the edge

of a cliff, so it now seemed to us that we had hastened to meet the

great danger rather than run away from it. Here at this spot, so

memorable to us, we heard the warning: "Back! Not another step! Know

you not whither your footsteps tend, whither this deceitful path is

luring you?"

It seemed to us that we now knew, and our feeling of overflowing

thankfulness impelled us so irresistibly towards our earnest

counsellor and trusty Eckart, that both of us sprang up at the same

moment and rushed towards the philosopher to embrace him. He was just

about to move off, and had already turned sideways when we rushed up

to him. The dog turned sharply round and barked, thinking doubtless,

like the philosopher's companion, of an attempt at robbery rather than

an enraptured embrace. It was plain that he had forgotten us. In a

word, he ran away. Our embrace was a miserable failure when we did

overtake him; for my friend gave a loud yell as the dog bit him, and

the philosopher himself sprang away from me with such force that we

both fell. What with the dog and the men there was a scramble that

lasted a few minutes, until my friend began to call out loudly,

parodying the philosopher's own words: "In the name of all culture and

pseudo-culture, what does the silly dog want with us? Hence, you

confounded dog; you uninitiated, never to be initiated; hasten away

from us, silent and ashamed!" After this outburst matters were cleared

up to some extent, at any rate so far as they could be cleared up in

the darkness of the wood. "Oh, it's you!" ejaculated the philosopher,

"our duellists! How you startled us! What on earth drives you to jump

out upon us like this at such a time of the night?"

"Joy, thankfulness, and reverence," said we, shaking the old man by

the hand, whilst the dog barked as if he understood, "we can't let you

go without telling you this. And if you are to understand everything

you must not go away just yet; we want to ask you about so many things

that lie heavily on our hearts. Stay yet awhile; we know every foot of

the way and can accompany you afterwards. The gentleman you expect may

yet turn up. Look over yonder on the Rhine: what is that we see so

clearly floating on the surface of the water as if surrounded by the

light of many torches? It is there that we may look for your friend, I

would even venture to say that it is he who is coming towards you with

all those lights."

And so much did we assail the surprised old man with our entreaties,

promises, and fantastic delusions, that we persuaded the philosopher

to walk to and fro with us on the little plateau, "by learned lumber

undisturbed," as my friend added.

"Shame on you!" said the philosopher, "if you really want to quote

something, why choose Faust? However, I will give in to you, quotation

or no quotation, if only our young companions will keep still and not

run away as suddenly as they made their appearance, for they are like

will-o'-the-wisps; we are amazed when they are there and again when

they are not there."

On the Future of our Educational Institutions · 第 16 / 20 题