Capital and Labor: Philosophy of "Strikes."

What the _land question_ was to the agricultural population of Ireland,

the labor question _is_ to the toiling masses of the United States--who,

in one or another form of manufacturing industry, in mines and shops, or

public employment, are honestly striving to "earn their bread by the

sweat of their brow."

In the case of the Irish people the question was one of life and death,

or, what was practically the same, starvation or exile.

An alternative so monstrous and so pitiful is not presented in the

United States to those who toil; but the conditions and prospects

presented to them are often harsh and bitter.

We have seen in the instances of labor strikes, and by the simultaneous

suspension of work in the great mills and factories, that tens of

thousands of men accustomed to subsist by the returns of their daily

toil, have been reduced, with their families, to want and wretchedness.

The accounts given in the public journals of the sufferings in Ohio and

Pennsylvania during the recent strikes amongst the miners, recalls the

widespread, and, in instances, awful distress which prevailed in the

districts in question.

The startling figures lately put forth by representatives of the Knights

of Labor, which is said to be a powerful and widely extended labor

organization, as to the number of unemployed men in the United States,

seem incredible in the face of the apparent activity of trade and the

general seeming prosperity; but there is no doubt the real figures are

great enough to excite deep concern on the part of the thoughtful and

reflecting observer.

It does not require that one should be either a philosopher or a

communist to see in the prevailing conditions of the labor element in

the United States, that something is seriously out of gear. With capital

everywhere concentrating in the form of monopolies,--whether it be in

the consolidation of railroads and telegraphs, or in mills and mines

where products are "pooled," or yet in the colossal stores and

factories, on every hand is seen the strengthening and solidifying of

capital in the hands of the few. And this consolidation, it is plain, is

only effected by sweeping out or swallowing up smaller enterprises. This

is the logical and perhaps inevitable result of our modern social

system--in which wealth and "greed of gain" is held to be the chief end

of life. But, with this visible agglomeration of wealth in the hands of

the comparatively few, what is to be said of the conditions and

prospects of the laboring masses? If, happily, in the acquisition and

accumulation of wealth by monopolists, we could hope for the rules and

application of Christian principles and a realizing sense of Christian

duties in its employment and distribution, there would then be less

occasion for concern and apprehension in considering the problems

presented in the questions of "Capital and Labor." However seductive and

alluring may be the dreams and vagaries of latter-day theorizers,

inequality of social and worldly conditions is and will remain the rule.

_Utopia_ will remain in the books; it cannot be realized, in fact, under

the conditions of our or any other known civilization. It can and may be

realized, but in a form and fashion outside the ken of the modern

"philosopher,"--and that will be by the universal acceptance of Divine

law and the general practice of the Divine commands.

The Ten Commandments and the Sermon on the Mount contain the solution of

all the problems with which we are concerned in the discussion of this

question. When capital recognizes and acts up to _the duties_ involved

in and implied by the possession of wealth, labor will recognize and

respect _the rights_ of capital.

The philosophy of the question turns upon these two simple words,

"RIGHTS" and "DUTIES."

Adam Smith says: "The property which every man has in his own labor, as

it is the original foundation of all other property, so it is the most

sacred and inviolable. The patrimony of a poor man lies in the strength

and dexterity of his hands; and to hinder him from employing this

strength and dexterity in what manner he thinks proper, without injury

to his neighbor, is a plain violation of this most sacred property." A

distinguished Catholic authority--Cardinal Manning--gives a more concise

definition--"the honest exertion of the powers of our minds and of our

body for our own good, and for the good of our neighbors."

The rights of the workman to dispose of his own toil on his own terms

cannot be questioned, nor can his right to combine and unite with other

toilers for purposes of mutual protection be seriously questioned.

Indeed, such unions and combinations may be said to be a necessity in

the existing order.

How is it possible except through such union and combination to resist

the power of great corporations and exacting monopolies, which, as a

rule, little regard the rights of the day laborer. Capital is protected

by its own innate power, by its influence over legislation and

legislative bodies, and by the readiness with which "pools" and

"combinations" are formed to its bidding; but in its control over labor

it is more powerful still by reason of the helplessness of the working

masses, who must work in order to live. An autocratic order from the

chief of some great corporation will sometimes reduce the wages of tens

of thousands of employes from ten to twenty per cent in one swoop. And

the tens of thousands have no redress or alternative unless to "strike."

And here lies the difficulty. The public, as a rule, do not sympathize

with "strikes" and "strikers." Strikes are always inconvenient. They

upset the existing order, disturb business, and sometimes lead to

destruction of property.

There is, and can be, of course, no justification for lawlessness. If

the rights of the workman to fix a price for his labor, and other

conditions as to the hours of his service, cannot be disputed, the equal

rights of the employers to fix the terms and price to be paid is no less

certain. Between these often irreconcilable conditions lie only

submission, strikes, or arbitration. The former is often expedient, the

second sometimes necessary, the last is always wise. A leading mine

owner, widely known for his uniform practical sympathy with his

operatives, and for his public spirit and high character, Col. William

P. Rend, of Chicago, has lately put forward, in several public

conventions representing the mining interests, a method of arbitration

which would be invoked in case of differences between employers and

operatives.

The simple suggestion of arbitration as the true remedy carries on its

face the evident solution of this vexed labor problem.

It is not necessary to suggest details. The fundamental idea is that all

differences may and ought to be reconciled by frank and honest

arbitration. Where employers will meet operatives on this half-way

neutral ground, an adjustment may be confidently looked for in most

cases. The arts of the demagogue and the threats of the socialists will

no longer be effective with the laboring masses. Where arbitration by

mutual agreement is not practicable, legislative "Boards of Arbitration"

could be appealed to; and these should be provided for by law in every

state.

When corporations and individual employers shall, as very many to their

honor, be it said, undoubtedly do, show due regard and consideration for

the rights and necessities of workmen and operatives, there need be no

fear of the spectre of communistic disorder in the United States. Our

mechanics and workingmen are instinctively conservative and cannot be

led away permanently into dangerous societies and combinations, if only

capital will join in promoting the adoption of "arbitration" as the true

solution of the labor problem.

WM. J. ONAHAN in _Scholastic Annual_.

* * * * *

A CURE for tight shoes--go barefoot.

Senator Hayes.

A SKETCH OF HIS ANTECEDENTS IN IRELAND AND AMERICA--HIS BRILLIANT

ELECTION.

[Illustration: HON. JOHN J. HAYES.]

Among the forty gentlemen elected to serve in the Senate during the

present term of the General Court of Massachusetts, we hesitate not to

predict that it will be found that Hon. John J. Hayes, the subject of

this brief sketch, will bring to bear upon such questions for

legislative consideration and action as may devolve upon him a most

intelligent culture, a well-developed business training and thorough

uprightness of purpose. In choosing him as their senatorial

representative, the voters of the Eighth Suffolk District, embracing

Wards Twenty-two, Twenty-three, Twenty-four and Twenty-five--all

combined, having a preponderating majority of Republican votes--have

exhibited the soundest judgment, we are confident, in the exercise of

citizen-franchise. Mr. Hayes' election was a well-considered rebuke to

the narrow systems of legislation prevalent in most of the New England

States. Hon. William H. Spooner, the district Senator of last year, is,

in private and business life, an honorable and esteemed gentleman; but

being an extreme partisan in politics and a zealot in sectional

legislative efforts, when a fitting candidate was offered at the last

election to oppose him, a gentleman of adequate views of the needs and

requirements of his fellow-citizens to confront him, the voters

hesitated not at the polls whom to choose.

Among his fellow-citizens of Boston and vicinity, Senator Hayes is well

recognized as an uncompromising adherent of Home Rule principles in the

affairs of Ireland, his native land. These come naturally to him. His

father, Mr. John Hayes, now of Manchester, N. H., was a devoted

supporter of O'Connell and, though young in years, was in turn warmly

appreciated by the great liberator. From the most steadfast patriotism

he has never swerved, and the blood in his children's veins, with the

teachings he inculcated, impels them to tread in the same path of

patriotic purpose as their worthy sire.

Our Senator was born in Killarney, Kerry, January 26, 1845. His

childhood saw many days amidst the inspiring scenes of this grand and

most lovely portion of Ireland. He was educated in Dublin. Mr. Hayes

entered for the civil service examination for the war office department

before the noted Military Institute of Stapleton of Trinity College, and

readily passed the first examination. Pending the usual delay preceding

the second examination, the Bank of Ireland threw their appointments

open to public examination, and John J. received the first of fourteen

appointments, several hundred persons being competitors for these

places. He was assigned to serve in the Dublin office of the Bank, and

subsequently found rapid advancement in the Gorey and Arklow branches as

cashier, and later in the same capacity in the respectively more

responsible branches of the Bank in Drogheda and Cork. Mr. Hayes growing

restive under the naturally slow advancement in the Bank's services,

accepted a tempting offer from one of the strongest banks in Canada and

reached Boston en route thereto. Here, however, he was met with a

business offer which induced him to pitch his fortune in Boston business

circles, and after a few years became the junior member of the firm of

Brown & Hayes, importers, exporters and commission merchants, Broad

Street, and where he still continues to do the same business. His firm

changed to Hayes & Poppele in 1877 and as it is now to Hayes & Angle.

Under the new organization of the School Board, Senator Hayes served

five years, from 1876 to 1880, during which he won deserved confidence

by his independence and unremitting watchfulness in school matters.

During these years he held several chairmanships and membership in

committees on accounts, salaries and other executive duties of the

board. He was a pronounced advocate of proper compensation to teachers

in which work he has always felt and shown a great and sympathetic

interest. From the advent of his services on the board, the teachers had

reason to know him as a friend, who would do battle for them against

reduction of their salaries, as was many times attested by his minority

reports and speeches in session. He resisted the attempts to do away

with the Suburban High Schools, and the residents of the sections where

they are located should feel indebted to his leading opposition to such

attempts for the retention of these suburban schools.

Mr. Hayes has been a director in several insurance companies and has

been for many years on the executive committee of the Union Institution

for Savings. Senator Hayes resides in a handsome residence, surrounded

by ample grounds, in the Dorchester district, Ward Twenty-four. He is a

thorough Democrat in principle. It was, therefore, a most flattering

testimony to his personal popularity and of the great respect of his

usual political opponents that they voted for him. Particularly is this

the case in so far as his Dorchester Republican neighbors are concerned,

so many of these being of the ancient and wealthy families, descendants

of the earlier colonial settlers of Massachusetts Bay. The district also

embraces the homes of many retired merchants and strong business men of

Boston. In view of all the circumstances, Mr. Hayes' senatorial campaign

success, it must be conceded, was a most brilliant one.

Saints and Serpents.

Even among Catholics the story of St. Patrick's driving the snakes and

other reptiles out of Ireland has often been made the subject of, let us

say, good-natured jest. But, besides, among others than Irishmen the

legend has been laid to the score of the excessive credulity of

Irishmen. I myself have heard German Catholics instance this story as an

evidence of the excesses into which the Celtic mind is apt to run. And

yet, investigation shows that the Irish are not alone in their pious

belief. Father Chas. Cahier, a Jesuit, has compiled a work entitled

"_Caracteristiques des Saints dans l'Art Populaire_." It is a most

wonderful and valuable storehouse of information, illustration, and

explanation. Thus we find in that our saint is not only patron of

Ireland but also of Murcia in Spain, for the reason that on his feast,

17th of March, 1452, was won the battle of Los Alporchones. Turning to

the heading "Serpent," we meet with a long array of saints represented

in painting or sculpture with one or more of these reptiles in his

vicinity. Italy, Brittany, Germany, France, Syria, Egypt, and other

lands furnish legends as strange as that concerning our apostle. In

fact, comparatively small space is devoted to him by the erudite Jesuit.

He briefly says, "It is thoroughly admitted by the Irish that he drove

from their Isle the serpents and other venomous animals. It is even

added that the English have many times, but in vain, endeavored to

acclimate venomous animals in Ireland." In a footnote he continues as

follows:

"A prose of Saint Patrick (in the _Officia SS. Patritii,

Columbae, Brigidae_, etc., Paris, 1620, in 16, p. 110-112)

says:

"'Virosa reptilia

Prece congregata,

Pellit ab Hibernia

Mari liberata.'

"Cf. Molan Hist. SS. Imag., lib. iii. cap. x. (ed. Paquot, p.

265). _Nieremberg, De Miraculosis ... in Europa_, lib. ii.

cap. LXII. (p. 469, sq.); et cap. XVIII. (p. 429).

"Nevertheless, Father Theoph. Raynaud (Opp, t. viii. p. 513) says that

this might have been a fact existing in Ireland previous to the days of

her apostle."

In Jocelyn's "Life and Acts of Saint Patrick," Chap. CLXIX., we read,

"Even from the time of its original inhabitants, did Hibernia labor

under a three-fold plague: a swarm of poisonous creatures, whereof the

number could not be counted; a great concourse of demons visibly

appearing; and a multitude of evil-doers and magicians. And these

venomous and monstrous creatures, rising out of the earth and out of the

sea, so prevailed over the whole island that they not only wounded men

and animals with their deadly sting, but slayed them with cruel bitings,

and not seldom rent and devoured their members."

Chapter CLXX. continues: "And the most holy Patrick applied all his

diligence unto the extirpation of this three-fold plague; and at length

by his salutary doctrine and fervent prayer he relieved Hibernia of the

increasing mischief. Therefore he, the most excellent pastor, bore on

his shoulder the staff of Jesus, and aided of the angelic aid, he by its

comminatory elevation gathered together from all parts of the island,

all the poisonous creatures into one place; then compelled he them all

unto a very high promontory, which was then called Cruachan-ailge, but

now Cruachan-Phadring; and by the power of his word he drove the whole

pestilent swarm from the precipice of the mountain headlong into the

ocean. O eminent sign! O illustrious miracle! even from the beginning of

the world unheard, but now experienced by tribes, by peoples and by

tongues, known unto all nations, but to the dwellers in Hibernia

especially needful! And at this marvellous, yet most profitable sight, a

most numerous assembly was present; many of whom had flocked from all

parts to behold miracles, many to receive the word of life.

"Then turned he his face toward Mannia, and the other islands which he

had imbued and blessed with the faith of Christ and with the holy

sacraments; and by the power of his prayers he freed all these likewise

from the plague of venomous reptiles. But other islands, the which had

not believed at his preaching, still are cursed with the procreation of

those poisonous creatures."

The Rev. Mr. O'Farrell, in his "Popular life of Saint Patrick," says,

"Rothe in his elucidations upon this passage of Jocelyn, compared this

quality bestowed upon Irish soil, through the prayers of Saint Patrick,

with that conferred upon Malta by the merits of Saint Paul, with this

difference, he adds, 'that while in Malta serpents, adders, and other

venomous reptiles, retain their life and motion, and lose only their

poisonous power, in Ireland they can neither hurt nor exist, inasmuch as

not only the soil but the climate and atmosphere, are unto them instant

death.'"

Ribadeneira says that even the wood of Ireland is proof against

poisonous reptiles. He declares that King's College, Cambridge, is built

within of Irish oak, and consequently not even a spider can be found

within it.

In the first volume of Chambers' "Book of Days" is told the story of the

attempt made by James Cleland, an Irish gentleman, in 1831, to

introduce reptiles into the Holy Isle. He bought half a dozen harmless

English snakes (_natrix torquata_) in Covent Garden market, London, and

turned them loose in his garden in Rathgael, County Down. Within a week

one was killed at Milecross three miles distant. A peasant who found one

and thought it an eel, took it to Dr. J. L. Drummond, the celebrated

Irish naturalist, and was horrified to learn that it was a genuine

serpent. There was great excitement, and it was fortunate for Mr.

Cleland that his connection with the affair was not known. One clergyman

preached on the discovery of the reptile as a presage of the millennium;

another saw a relation between it and the cholera-morbus. Some energetic

men took the matter in hand and offered a reward for the dead bodies of

the snakes. Three were killed within a few miles of the garden, and the

others were never fully accounted for.

But to return to Father Cahier. He tells us of the following, depicted

in sacred art in close proximity to serpents.

MOSES is not only represented raising the brazen serpent in the desert

to cure those who had been bitten by the reptiles (Num. xxi. 6-9), but

also casting his rod on the ground, that it may be changed into a

serpent--either at God's command before the burning bush as proof of his

divine mission (Exod. iv. 1-5), or before Pharaoh to obtain the

deliverance of the Israelites. (Exod. viii. 8-13.)

SAINT PAUL THE APOSTLE. A viper hanging from his hand and which he is

shaking off into the fire. (Acts. xxviii. 3-6.) This event, which

occurred in the island of Malta, has given rise to a devotion greatly in

vogue, especially among the Greeks. Earth taken from a cavern, wherein

it is alleged Saint Paul took refuge after his shipwreck on the coast of

that island, is carried to a distance as a preservative against the bite

of dangerous beasts and against fevers.

There was also in by-gone times a persuasion that any man born on the

25th of January (the day of the apostle's conversion) was guaranteed

against the reptile's tooth.

SAINT ANDREW THE APOSTLE. His apocryphal legend relates, that he cast

out devils, under the form of serpents or dragons. (_Legend aur._, cap.

ii.) This is found represented amongst other places, on a stained-glass

window of the Cathedral of Chartres.

SAINT PETER CELESTINE, Pope. I do not remember, says Father Cahier, ever

to have seen him painted with a dragon or a large serpent; but it is

probable that this may be met with, especially in Italy. For it is

related that, having retired into a grotto of the Abruzzi, he expelled

from it a venomous serpent, which had made great ravages in the

neighborhood.

SAINT ROMAIN or ROMANUS, Bishop of Rouen; 24th of October, 639. His

dragon, or serpent, gave rise to an annual procession, during which a

prisoner was released in memory of the service rendered to the country

by the holy bishop. Father Cahier adds that this legend probably

allegorized the destruction of Paganism by the bishop's efforts in his

diocese.

SAINT SPIRIDION, Bishop of Tremithontes in the island of Cyprus; 14th of

December, about 348. Offering a serpent to a poor man.

He had a great reputation for charity, so the needy confidently applied

to him for aid. But one day when a beggar asked him for assistance, the

saint, who had nothing to give him, picked up a serpent, which the poor

man hardly cared to accept. Nevertheless, encouraged by the bishop, he

held his hand out; and the beast was converted into gold. (Surius, 14th

December.)

SAINT NARCISSUS, Bishop of Gironu in Catalonia, and apostle of Augsburg;

18th of March, about 307. It is related in the country of the Julian

Alps that he destroyed a dragon, which was posted beside a spring, from

which all the inhabitants fled.

SAINT AMAND, Bishop of Maestricht, and apostle of Flanders; 6th of

February, 675. While still a child, he drove, it is said, from the

island of Oye (near La Rochelle) a serpent which he met in his way.

(_Acta Sanctorum_, Februar., t. i, p. 849.) Father Cahier says that the

original is a dragon, which artists have converted into a serpent, and

that it is quite likely it symbolizes the idols overthrown by the

saint's apostolic labors in the country about Ghent.

SAINT MODESTUS, Bishop of Jerusalem; 16th of December, seventh century.

Putting to death a serpent which infested a fountain; much like the

legend of Saint Narcissus. (Bagatta, _Admiranda orbis_, lib. vii. cap.

i, Sec.. 19, No. 29.)

SAINT HILARY, Bishop of Poitiers; 14th of January, about 368. Old

artists paint him with a staff around which is twined a serpent; or

serpents fleeing from that staff. This signifies, that during his exile,

he completely banished the reptiles which infested the island of

_Gallinaria_ in the Mediterranean, near Genoa (the Gallinara of the

present day). According to other versions he did not exactly rid the

entire island of those animals, but simply relegated them to a corner of

the land, where he planted his staff as a boundary which they were

nevermore to pass. (P. de Natal., libr. ii, cap. LXVIII.--AA. SS.,

_Januar._, t. i, p. 792.) Cl. Robert quotes an epitaph on the doctor of

Poitiers, found, he says, in an ancient manuscript, although the style

gives little indication of the Middle Ages.

"Hilarius cubat hac, pictavus episcopus, urna;

Defensor nostrae mirificus fidei.

Illius aspectum serpentes ferre nequibant,

Nescis quae in vultu spicula sanctus habet."

Might this be, asks Father Cahier, a way of expressing the fact that the

saint had banished Arianism from amongst his people?

It is elsewhere shown that the dragons of many legions may be

interpreted by the overthrow and expulsion of Paganism, that is, the end

of Satan's reign over hearts. The serpent seems to have had something of

this symbolism in ecclesiastical monuments, except that sometimes, here

or there, it probably denotes heresy instead of idolatry. (Cf. Manni,

_Osservazioni istoriche sopra i sigilli antichi dei secoli bassi_, t. V,

sigill. 15.)

SAINT PIRMIN, (_Pirminus_ or _Pirminius_) travelling bishop in Germany

(and a Benedictine, it is said); 3d November, 758. He is described as a

bishop of Meaux, who left his see in order to go and preach the Gospel

along the banks of the Rhine; and he is usually painted as putting a

multitude of serpents to flight. (_Calendar._ Benedict., 3d of

Nov.--Rader, _Bavaria Sancta_.) A sequence of Saint Gall (ap. Mone,

_Hymni ... media aevi_, t. III., p. 482, sq.) thus describes the marvel:

"Hic Augiensem insulam

Dei nutu intraverat,

Quam multitudo pessima

Destinebat serpentium.

Intrante illo ...

Statim squammosus

Hestinanter exercitus

Aufugit, ampli lacus

Natatu tergus

Tegens per triduum."

Amongst other abbeys of his foundation, he established that of Reichenau

in the island of Constance, vanishing from the island the vipers or

adders which had enormously multiplied in it. The legend even goes on to

say that, for three days, the surrounding water was covered with these

reptiles which forsook their old abode.

Was this story the legend or the consequence of an invocation of Saint

Pirmin against unwholesome drinks? Besides people recommended themselves

to this saint against the plague and the consequences of dangerous food.

Furthermore, his dalmatic and his cincture were considered powerful to

assuage the sufferings of pregnant women. An ancient seal of Saint

Pirmin is found with these two verses used in certain provinces of

Germany:

"Sanctificet nostram sanctus Pirminius escam,

Dextera Pirmini benedicat pocula nostra."

SAINT SAMSON, Bishop of Dol, in Brittany; 28th of July, about 564. Some

say he slew a dragon, and Father Cahier says this may be symbolic of the

many victories he gained over the enemy of men. According to several, it

was a serpent which he drove from a grotto on the banks of the Seine

(Cf. Longueval, _Histoire de l'Eglise gallicane_, livre IX.)

SAINT MELLON (Melon, _Mellonus_, _Mallonus_, _Mello_, _Melanius_?) first

Bishop of Rouen; 22d of October, about 214. A serpent of which his

legend speaks may be only the dragon of the saints who preached the

Gospel to idolatrous nations. An old office of his says:

"Manum sanat arescentem

Morsum curat, et serpentem

Sese cogit perdere."

His legend further relates that he overthrew in the city of Rouen the

idol _Roth_, and that the devil complained to him of the trouble he had

caused in his empire. (AA. SS. _Octobr._, t. IX., p. 572, sq.)

SAINT CADO (or Kadok, Cadout, Cadog, Catrog-Doeth, Cadvot), bishop and

martyr in Brittany; 1st of November, about 580. The Bretons relate that

on a little island off the coast of Vannes, between Port-Louis and

Auray, he drove the serpents away and they never appeared there again

(_Vie des Saints de la Bretagne_, p. 666). The island retains the name

of Enis-Cadvod or Inis-Kadok, that is, the island of Saint Cado.

A SAINT PATERNUS, bishop, whom Father Cahier cannot locate, is mentioned

as having warded off the bites of serpents. He cannot say, too, but that

there is more of symbolism than of real history in the story.

SAINT PEREGRINUS, bishop, martyred at Auxerre, 16th of May, third

century, driving out serpents. Though one may consider this

representation a manner of expressing the earnestness he displayed in

extirpating idolatry from the people of Auxerre, it is admitted that in

the Nivernais country (especially at Bouhy where he took refuge),

serpents are never seen. People even come to the church of that village

to take earth out of a hole habitually dug _ad hoc_; and that earth is

carried away as a preservative against the bite of reptiles. It is

besides regarded as an understood fact at Bouhy that a certain family

there always has the figure of a serpent on the body of some one

belonging to it. They are, according to the story, the descendants of a

pagan, who, striving to drive the saint away by hitting him with a whip,

saw the lash change into a serpent which "landed" near the rock where

Saint Peregrinus had sought refuge against persecution.

SAINT HONORATUS OF ARLES, or OF LERINS; 16th of January, about 430. When

he retired into the island which still bears his name, near the coast of

Provence, vainly was it represented to him that it was a receptacle of

venomous animals. The man of God exactly wanted a shelter, a refuge from

all visitors, and drove out all the serpents which had long multiplied

there without any obstacle. A palm-tree is still shown there, on which,

it is alleged, our saint waited until Heaven came to his aid, by having

the waves sweep away all that "vermin" which had rendered the island

uninhabitable until then. (Surius, 16 Januar.; and AA. SS. _Januar._, t.

II., p. 19.) Observe that the islands of Saint-Honorat and

Sainte-Marguerite are held in that country to have formed but one in

olden days, which was the real Lerins, Pliny and Strabo to the contrary

notwithstanding.

SAINT PROTUS OF SARDINIA, priest; 25th of October, under Diocletian. He

was martyred with the deacon Saint Januarius and Saint Gavinus, a

soldier converted by them. Protus, exiled at first to the island of

Asinara(?) drove from it, it is said, all the venomous beasts. Many even

would have it that this privilege was extended to the whole of Sardinia,

for which, however, Father Cahier says he would not make himself

responsible. (Cf. _Hagiolog. italic._, t. II., p. 256). Hence a reptile

is often represented at the feet of the saint, while artists often

associate him with his two companions in martyrdom. In this case they

may be easily distinguished by their costumes of priest, deacon, and

soldier, which indicate the profession of each.

SAINT FLORENCE OF NORCIA (_Florentius_ or _Florentinus_), monk; 23d of

May, about 547. He has been confounded, rightly or wrongly, with Saint

Florence of Corsica. But Saint Gregory the Great (_Dialog._, III., 15,

ed Galliccioli, t. VI., p. 202) speaks of him only as a simple monk, and

relates that he destroyed a multitude of serpents by his prayer.

SAINT FLORENCE OF GLONNE, priest, patron of Saumur and Roye; 22d of

September, fourth century. He is sometimes said to have thrown a dragon

or serpent into the Loire, but the Bas-Bretons give the credit to Saint

Mein, abbot of Gael, who lived more than a century later.

SAINT AMANTIUS OF CITTA-DI-CASTELLO, priest; 26th of September, towards

the end of the sixth century. He became famous in his lifetime by

numerous miracles, especially by delivering the people of the country in

which he dwelt from serpents. (Gregor. M., _Dialog._, III., 35. Brantii

_Martyrol poeticum_.)

SAINT JULIUS, priest; 31st of January, about 399. The island of Orta,

near Novara, was delivered by him from a quantity of serpents when he

went there to build the last church he erected. According to some, these

reptiles, put to flight by the holy man's blessing, plunged into the

lake; others say that the serpents took refuge on Mount Camocino near

there, but that they never hurt any one any more. (Labus, _Fasti_, 31

gennajo.--AA. SS. Januar., t. II., p. 1103.) The lake of Orta is still

called _Lago de san Giulio_, by the people of the country around Milan.

SAINT MAGNUS (_Magnoaldus_), abbot of Fuessen, and apostle of Algan; 6th

of September, about 660. At Kempten this saint is credited with having

expelled venomous animals; as for the dragon, he is said to have caused

its death by his prayers at _AEqui caput_. However this may be, his staff

was employed at Abthal against field rats, and in Brisgan against all

kinds of insects that might injure the crops. (Cf. Wilh. Mueller, _Gesch

... der altdentschen Religion_, p. 113.--_Calendar. benedict._, 6th of

Septembr.--Rader, _Bavaria sancta_.)

SAINT DIDYMUS, in the East. Father Cahier cannot say whether it is

Didymus of Alexandria (28th of April) or Didymus of Laodicea (11th of

September). Several modern German authors, copying one another, say that

he is represented walking on serpents and nailed to the cross. Either,

says Father Cahier, I greatly mistake, or the martyr of Laodicea, who

was torn on a stake (_Menolog. graec._, t. I., p. 29,) is confounded with

the hermit of the same name who used to walk amongst the most dangerous

reptiles (scorpions, horned vipers, etc.), without ever being injured by

them. (Rosweyde, _Vitae PP._, p. 479.)

SAINT PHOCAS OF ANTIOCH, in Syria, martyr; 5th March, time disputed. He

is famed in the East as a signal protector against the bite of reptiles.

These reptiles are often represented near the church which is dedicated

to him, because it is acknowledged that they lose their venom as soon as

they approach it, and that those bitten by them there recover health.

(Cf. _Martyrol. Rom._, 5 mart.)

SAINT CHRISTOPHER OF LYCIA, martyr; 25th of July, about 560. A serpent

is sometimes placed near him, either because reptiles were used without

effect to torture him, or on account of some miracle due to his

intercession long after his death. (AA. SS. _Jul._, t. VI., p. 137-139.)

Father Cahier adds, in a note, if, as Servius says, the word _anguis_

was used to denote reptiles which live in water, consequently amphibious

animals, it becomes easier to understand that inundations may have been

expressed by a dragon or a serpent; so many writers have thought, the

Bollandists amongst others. So, in many cases, it may have been a

symbolic picture, whose significance was lost in the lapse of time. A

serpent near Saint Christopher might indicate that the saint had crossed

deep water.

SAINT LEONTIUS, martyr; honored at Muri in Switzerland, as one of the

soldiers of the Theban legion. A serpent is given him as attribute, with

a little phial. Father Cahier says he has failed to discover the

significance of the emblems.

SAINT AMABLE OF RIOM, priest; 19th of October, fifth century. Near him

serpents and venomous animals, because it is said that he drove all

maleficent beasts out of the neighborhood of Riom.

SAINT BRIAC, abbot; 17th of December, about 609. He banished a serpent

with the sign of the cross. This saint met a man who was already stung

by a dangerous reptile and fleeing from the animal, which was in pursuit

of him. The servant of God, by giving his blessing, cured the wounded

man and put the animal to flight. (_Vies des Saints de la Bretagne._)

SAINT MAUDEZ, hermit; 18th of November, seventh century. Driving out of

an island, in which he had established his hermitage, a number of

reptiles that lived in the place. The custom is preserved in Brittany of

using earth taken from the island as a remedy for serpents' bites.

(_Vies des Saints de la Bretagne_, p. 724, 725.)

SAINT JOHN OF REOMEY, founder of this abbey, which afterwards took the

name of Montier-Saint-Jean; 28th of January, about 545. He is generally

represented beside a well and holding a sort of dragon chained. His

legend relates that he caused the death of a basilisk which made the

water of a well or fountain dangerous. (_Calend. benedict._, 28 januar.)

Sometimes instead of this dragon (winged) there is placed near him a

chained serpent. (Cf. Aug. de Bastard, _Memoire sur les crosses_, p.

776.)

SAINT BEAT OR BEATUS OF VENDOMOIS, hermit; 9th of May, year difficult to

determine. The story goes that, finding a reptile in the grotto into

which he desired to retire, near the Loire, he drove the animal out with

the sign of the cross. (AA. SS., _Maii_, t. II., p. 365. D. Piolin,

_Hist. de l'Eglise du Mans_, t. I., p. 62.)

SAINT LIFARD (_Liphardus_, _Liethphardus_), hermit, afterwards abbot at

Meun-sur-Loire; 3d of June, about 540. Near him in pictures is a staff

planted in the earth, and bitten at top by a serpent, which is broken in

the middle of the body. It is related that near his cell an enormous

serpent prevented the people of the locality from having access to a

fountain. Urbitius, a disciple of the holy man, ran one day to him,

telling him that he had met the dreadful reptile. Lifard smiled and bade

Urbitius be ashamed of his lack of faith, and gave him his staff with

orders to plant it in the ground in front of the beast. This being done,

and while the hermit was praying to God, the monster sprang upon the

staff, which he bit with madness. The weight of the monstrous beast made

it burst in the middle, and the country was delivered from him. (Surius,

3 jun.)

Outside of France, this is sometimes represented by an empaled dragon

from which issue a number of little dragons flying away. (_Calendar.

benedict._, 4 jun.)

SAINT LEONARD THE YOUNGER, abbot of Vendeuve; 15th of October, about

570. He is represented with a serpent near him, because one of these

serpents having crawled towards the holy man while he was at prayer,

stopped without being able to hurt him. He is also represented with a

serpent dying at his feet or twined around his body. (AA. SS., Octobr.,

t. VII., p. 48, sq.) It is asserted that a serpent has never since

appeared in that place.

SAINT MEMIN (or Maximin), abbot of Micy; 15th of December, 520. He is

painted holding a serpent, because he is said to have driven a dangerous

reptile from the banks of the Loire. (Aug. de Bastard, _Crosses_, p.

776.)

SAINT DOMINIC OF SARA, abbot of the order of Saint Benedict; 22d of

January, about 1031. A present of fish sent to the holy man having been

abstracted on the way, the rogues were rather surprised to find only

snakes instead of the fish they had stolen. (_Calendar. benedict._, 22

januar.,--Brantii, _Martyrol. poetic._)

"Qui missos sancto pisces abscondit, in angues

Mutatos, rediens vidit et obstupuit."

SAINT VINCENT OF AVILA, with Saint Sabina and Saint Christeta, his

sisters; 27th of October, under Diocletian. The bodies of these martyrs

having been abandoned to beasts of prey, an enormous serpent protected

their remains from any insult. A Jew, even, who had come to see the

corpses, ran such danger from the reptile that he made a vow to receive

baptism. (_Espana sagrada_, t. XIV., p. 32.)

SAINT GORRY (Godrick, Godrich, _Godricus_), hermit in England; 21st of

May, 1170. He put himself under the direction of the monks of Durham,

and passed the latter part of his life in a solitude. He is represented

surrounded by serpents, because those venomous animals gathered around

him and did him no harm. (_Calend. benedict._, 29 mai.--AA. SS., _Maii_,

t. V., p. 68, sqq.)

The Blessed BONAGIUNTA MANETTI, Servite and first general of his order;

31st of August, 1257. Father Cahier says that in France pictures of the

Servites are seldom found, and then with no particular emblem. He,

however, found one in which the blessed Bonagiunta is blessing loaves

which break, and bottles from which serpents escape. In the art of the

Middle Ages a serpent is the emblem of poison, and so it seems to be

here. As the holy man, while asking alms for his community, did not

hesitate to rebuke sinners, he gave offence to a Florentine merchant.

Pretending to be repentant and charitable, he sent poisoned bread and

wine to the Servite monastery. The Blessed Bonagiunta received the man

who brought the pretended alms, and said to him, "I know well that thy

master would take my life. But tell him that no evil will happen us, and

that death will soon strike himself." The prophecy was accomplished.

(Cf. Brocchi, _Vite dei SS. Fiorentini_, t. I., p. 246.)

SAINT HELDRADUS, abbot of Novalese (13th of March, 875), is said to have

expelled the serpents that infested the valley of Briancon where the

saint wanted to establish a colony of his monks. (AA. SS., Mart., t.

II., p. 334.)

SAINT THECLA, virgin and martyr; 23d of September, Apostolic age. This

saint is called a martyr, and even the first of martyrs, because

although her life was not taken in torments, she seems to be the first

Christian woman who was given over to the barbarity of Pagan public

power. It is related that she was thrown into a ditch filled with

vipers, but a ball of fire fell from heaven and killed all those

venomous animals. So she is sometimes painted with a fiery globe in her

hand or near her. Father Cahier adds that her Acts have not come to us

with sufficient indications of authenticity; but the church, in her

prayers for the dying, retains the memory of the three tortures (flames,

wild beasts, and venomous animals), from which the saint was delivered

by assistance from on high. She prays: "As thou didst deliver that most

blessed virgin Thecla from three most cruel torments, so vouchsafe to

deliver the soul of this Thy servant," etc.[3]

SAINT CHRISTINA, virgin and martyr in Tuscany; 24th of July, towards the

end of the third century. Same attribute and same reason as for as Saint

Thecla. (Bagatta, _Admiranda orbis_, lib. VII., cap. I., 19, No. 3.)

SAINT ANATOLIA, virgin, martyred with Saint Audax, 9th of July, about

250. She was confined in a narrow dungeon, with a venomous serpent,

which was expected to kill her. When it was thought that she was slain,

Audax, one of those Marsi who prided themselves on being able to charm

reptiles, was sent into the prison. But the virgin was unhurt, and the

serpent flung itself on the pretended charmer, who was delivered only at

Anatolia's command. Audax was converted to Christianity, and gave his

life for Jesus Christ some time after the death of the saint, who was

pierced by a sword. (_Martyrol. Rom._, 9 Jul.--Bagatta, _Admiranda

orbis_, lib. VII., cap. I., Sec. 19, No. 17.)

SAINT VERENA, virgin at Zurzach in Switzerland; 1st of September, about

the beginning of the fourth century. At her prayer, it is said, a

quantity of venomous serpents forsook the country and flung themselves

into the Aar.

SAINT VERDIANA (_Viridiana_), virgin of the Third Order of Saint

Francis, or of Valeambrosa at Castel-Fiorentino; 13th of February, 1242.

Living as a recluse with serpents. She imposed this sort of penance on

herself to overcome the horror that reptiles excited in her, and took

care to feed these strange guests herself so that they would not go

away. (Bagatta, _l. c._, ibid., No. 27.)

SAINT ISBERGA, (_Itisberga_), a hermit virgin near Aire in Artois,

afterwards abbess; 21st of May, about 770. As daughter of Pepin and

sister of Charlemagne, she is often represented with a crown and a

mantle covered with fleurs-de-lis. But she is particularly distinguished

by another emblem. An eel is put in her hand, sometimes on a dish, and

for this reason: A powerful prince had asked Isberga's hand in marriage;

but in order to preserve the vow of virginity which she had made, she

besought God to send her some disease which would disfigure her. Her

face was soon covered with pustules, and the suitor no longer insisted

upon marrying her. Heaven then revealed to Isberga that she would be

cured by eating the first fish that would be caught in the Lys. The men

whom she sent for that purpose toiled long without succeeding in taking

anything but an eel, along with which they brought up in their nets the

body of Saint Venantus, a hermit (the saint's director), who had been

slain and cast into the river by the princess's lover, for he blamed the

hermit for the resolution taken by the virgin whose hand he sought in

marriage. The discovery of the body brought the crime to light, and made

known the sanctity of Venantus, to whose merits Isberga ascribed the

efficacy of the fish in delivering her from disease. (AA. SS. _Maii_, t.

V., p. 44.--Dancoisne, _Numismatique bethunoise_, p. 165, sqq.)

SAINT ENIMIA OF GEVANDAN, virgin; 6th of October, about the seventh

century. She, too, is depicted with a serpent because she is said to

have delivered the country from that dangerous animal. (AA. SS.

_Octobr._, t. XI., p. 630, t. III., p. 306, sqq.)

SAINT CRESCENTIAN; 1st of June, 287. Coins of Urbino represent him armed

cap-a-pie, on foot or on horseback, and killing a dragon with his lance,

or carrying a flag; at other times he is seen in deacon's costume,

trampling a serpent under his feet. He is said to have been a Roman

soldier, and to have introduced the Gospel into Citta-di-Castello.

(Brantii _Martyrolog. poeticum_, 1 jun:

"Letifero Crescentinus serpente Tipherni

Occiso, gladio victima caesa cadit.")

Turning to another part of Father Cahier's work, we find that the

following saints are also represented with serpents:

SAINT JOHN THE EVANGELIST; 27th of December. He is represented holding a

sort of chalice surmounted by a little serpent or a dragon. The Golden

Legend says, that, to prove the truth of his teaching, he was compelled

to drink poison. Some of it was first given to two men condemned to

death and they died on the spot. The saint made the sign of the cross

over the cup, drank, suffered no inconvenience, and then restored the

two dead men to life. Father Cahier adds that this story seems to have

given rise to the custom especially prevalent among Germanic nations of

drinking to friends' health under pretense of honoring Saint John. He

says that this custom has sometimes been put under the protection of

Saint John the Baptist, but that it is not probable the Germans would

have cared about putting their _healths_ put under the protection of a

saint who drank only water.

SAINT CHARITON, hermit and abbot in Palestine; 28th of September, about

350. Near him is represented a serpent plunging its head in a cup. A

native of Lycaonia, and released by the Pagans after being tortured for

the faith, he went to Jerusalem, where he was taken by robbers, and

confined in the cave which was their retreat. A serpent came and drank

out of the vase in which their wine was, at the same time poisoning it

with his venom, and the robbers died in consequence, whereupon the saint

made the cave the cradle of a monastery. (_Menolog., graec_, t. I., p.

73.)

SAINT POURCAIN (_Portianus_), abbot in Auvergne; 24th of November, about

540. He is represented with a broken cup from which emerges a serpent.

King Thierry I. was ravaging Auvergne, and the holy abbot went to

intercede with him for the poor people. The King was still asleep when

he came, and the principal officer offered him a drink, which he refused

because he had not yet seen the king or celebrated the office. Pressed,

however, he blessed the vase which was brought him, it broke, and a

serpent came out of it. The whole court considered that he had been

saved from poison. (Gregor. Turon., _Vitae PP._, cap. V.)

SAINT JOHN OF SAHAGUN, Hermit of Saint Augustine; 12th of June, 1497. He

is represented amongst other ways, with a cup surmounted by a serpent.

This is because he was really poisoned by a dissolute woman in revenge

for the conversion of her lover by the saint and his consequent

dismissal of her. (AA. SS. _Jun._, t. II., p. 625.)

SAINT LOUIS BERTRAND, Dominican; 10th of October, 1581. A cup with a

serpent indicates that in his missions in America he had poison given

him more than once by the Pagans, without being injured by it.

Donahoe's Magazine, Volume 15, No. 3, March 1886 · 第 12 / 52 题