Gœthe said to that disciple to whom he most fully unveiled himself,--to

the privileged Eckermann,--“_All_ my poems are ‘occasional’ poems.” In

that resided their freshness, and Gœthe knew it well. “All my etchings

are ‘occasional’ etchings,” could be said by nearly every fine etcher,

too wise to set forth upon the picturesque tour with the deliberate

resolution to perpetrate particular prints. For the art of etching, if

it is to yield you its peculiar charm, must have been exercised--I

cannot say this thing too often--only upon spontaneous promptings. There

are very few exceptions. Méryon himself--that greatest genius, perhaps,

in original engraving whom our Nineteenth Century has known, and one of

the most elaborate of artists,--was not really an exception; for, slow

as his work must have been, the unity of impression preserved throughout

so long a labour--the original impulse--was there, which the

circumstance created. The spontaneity is essential. And few men better

than Colonel Goff have executed spontaneous work with the resources of a

firmly-held knowledge.

[Illustration: D. Y. CAMERON. “BORDER TOWERS.”]

[Illustration: D. Y. CAMERON. “THE PALACE, STIRLING CASTLE.”]

[Illustration: D. Y. CAMERON. “WINDMILLS, ZANDAAM.”]

XVIII.

CAMERON.

The amateur has had the opportunity of looking lately a good deal at the

prints of a young Scottish artist, Mr. D. Y. Cameron, who has himself,

to do him justice, looked long and much at the prints of the masters.

Though young, he has already been prolific, and has wrought not only

many plates, but in various methods. Of course, I like his work as

against that of men who, however gifted in other mediums of expression,

are not essentially etchers. For Mr. Cameron is essentially an etcher--a

fine engraver on the copper, above all things. Yet I cannot feel that

any great proportion of his work, thus far, has quite enough originality

or freedom; and if he is to live and last as an original engraver--as I

believe he may--he will have to acquire these virtues in yet larger

measure. Meanwhile, here are a few comments on certain of the best of

his most studiously wrought pieces, of which even the least attractive

do not lack a workmanlike accomplishment.

“The Arch,” a composition of curious shape--a tall, narrow plate--is a

performance of solidity and brightness, although it shows that Mr.

Cameron is apt to finish to the corners with a thoroughness too uniform

or obvious--to be, indeed, like Mr. C. J. Watson, a little too positive

and too material. In the “Flower Market,” with its fleeting lights and

shades, he leaves in part this positiveness. He makes an interesting

experiment, but, after all, recalls the theme to which he addresses

himself, only enough to assure you that the experiment has not been made

in the medium that is fittest for it. “Colour, colour, colour!” you say.

“The Palace, Stirling”--a dark forbidding interior--has certainly about

it a grim Celtic imagination, and is individual in that. The oppositions

of light and shade are at once strongly marked and skilful--their

distribution quite successfully studied--in “White Horse Close.” “The

Dolphins” (1892) is full of vigour and vitality. Even better, perhaps,

is “St. John Street, Stirling;” because its draughtsmanship is at once

freer and more hesitating--not fixed and petrified, that is, but

trembling with the semblance of life. And in the background of “A

Rembrandt Farm,” Mr. Cameron has wonderful reminiscences, both of the

maste touch and of his way of looking at the wide-stretched landscape

that he cared for the most. Nor does the plate suffer perhaps from being

for once a deliberate imitation, successfully accomplished. Yet I admire

Mr. Cameron more--my hope for his Future is more certain--when I hold in

my hand a good impression of his “Border Towers”--a composition of his

own North country--a thing in which the inspiration has been very

personal, and the fine work of detail has been obtained at no sacrifice

of noble breadth.

XIX.

PENNELL.

Mr. Pennell is an extremely clever, energetic, dexterous American, who

has found profitable employment in our English land. He has shown

himself to be a ready journalist in draughtsmanship. Drawing

architecture and the scenes of the street, he has produced not a little

art that is at once popular and tolerable; and he has even written about

Art, dealing sometimes with far profounder people than his own order of

mind permits him thoroughly to fathom. “Critic,” therefore, I cannot

call him, but able draughtsman, in a limited field, he unquestionably

is.

A somewhat small proportion of Mr. Pennel work has consisted of

etching, and in this he has shown, first, it appears, the influence of

Seymour Haden, and next, the influence of Whistler. Had he but brought a

personality to be enriched and fructified by great traditions! That,

however, has been denied him; and, possessed

[Illustration: JOSEPH PENNELL. “LE PUY EN VELAY.”]

well of the grammar of his art, and of some of the best of its methods,

he yet, as his own work reveals him, is, at times, uninteresting, since

he is always unimaginative. Vista he has none. Yet, how good can his

work be when the subject comes easily to help him! Nor is that seldom.

The plate of “Le Puy en Velay,” of which I give a reproduction, and

which I like so much, recalls a noble Dürer background--takes our

thoughts to those great elder masters who, from certain remarks that he

has made about them, I judge that Mr. Pennell scarcely likes at all. It

is the irony of circumstance.

XX.

MENPES.

Though Mr. Mortimer Menpes had etched not a few coppers before he gave

us the long series which recorded his impressions of Japan--and though,

no doubt, he has etched from time to time since then--it is by the forty

plates which constitute that Japanese set that he establishes his best

claim to be regarded as an artist, serious and interesting. Traces of

the Whistlerian vision, if not of the Whistlerian method, are

perceptible in these memoranda of the people and the theatre, and of the

long and low-built towns that stretch themselves sometimes along the

edge of sleeping waters. But the art of Mr. Menpes is not all of it

derivative. Something there is that is of himself alone, in the

impression received and in the manner of its registration. He has

economy of means, and yet abundance of resource. He is not merely a

draughtsman

[Illustration: MORTIMER MENPES. “JAPANESE GIRLS.”]

who has chosen to etch: he is an etcher whose feeling for the capacity

of his particular medium has in it much that is instinctive.

XXI.

RAVEN-HILL.

Mr. Raven-Hill--the artist who adds piquancy to comic newspapers--is

little known as an etcher; but his work upon the copper is delicate,

rightly precise and rightly free--it is in the best etche manner--and

if it is as yet so little recognized, that is only because it is so

scanty and has been so seldom exhibited. From several points of view the

small array of Mr. Raven-Hil etched work is interesting and valuable;

it is, almost invariably, observant record and admirable craftsmanship;

and not the least legitimate of its sources of interest lies in the fact

that in it the presence of the refined artist, as distinct from that of

the smart comic illustrator, is markedly asserted. Hereafter it may be

that Mr. Raven-Hill will choose to etch, and to etch ably, scenes from

the life of which, in other mediums, he has been, deservedly, a popular

exponent. Tom, Dick, and Harry--Harriet,

[Illustration: L. RAVEN-HILL. “THE WANDLE RIVER.”]

too, by all means--will then have their day upon the copper, nor will

clown and _cabotin_ be left out of the account. But, hitherto, the best

of Mr. Raven-Hil few etchings record scenes Whistler might have

chosen, and do so with a touch and choice of line which, it may well be,

that master might not desire to disown.

XXII.

MACBETH AND HERKOMER AND AXEL HAIG.

So much said, and yet nothing said of men a dozen times more popular

than the generally single-minded etchers are wont to be, of whom in

chief I have spoken. But to the large public, Macbeth and Herkomer and

Axel Haig appeal without need of introduction--Macbeth and Haig appeal

especially by treatment, and Herkomer especially by subject. Herkome

theme is generally a dramatic one, and into it he introduces such

obvious interest of line and of expression as may be found in a woman

with the picturesqueness of age, a man comely and vigorous, a girl with

Anne Pag “eyes of youth.” Mr. Herkomer has a story to tell

us--sometimes the story of a life as it is told in portraiture, and he

tells it with no absence of ability. But attractive as he well may be,

clever as he most surely is, he rarely reaches exquisiteness; nor is

there reason to think that the plate, the needle, and the aquafortis

constitute in any special way his proper

[Illustration: HUBERT HERKOMER, R.A. “GWENDYDD.”]

medium. Still, one who is, as everybody knows, so spirited and energetic

an artist--the author of so many a valiant experiment, the winner of an

occasional triumph in the art of Painting, from the day of the

“Pensioners” to the day of the “Burgomasters”--can be a graceful

sketcher on the copper, when he likes, or from time to time, at all

events.

Robert Macbet inventive work in etching does not want originality;

but it is not the originality of an etcher, in method or vision of the

world, but rather the originality of his own painted pictures. These, or

the effects of them, elaborate and interesting, he reproduces, as far as

may be, in the print. For nearly twenty years he has, from time to time,

etched his own conceptions, and during much of this long period the

public has surely benefited by his able, dexterous translations of great

or charming masters, from Velasquez to Mason. A certain proportion of

his original work upon the copper was performed--and not indeed

unnaturally--before Mr. Macbeth became familiar with the

technical resources of the craft. Thus, the “Potato Harvest”--an

interesting subject, and treated, as to its composition, very

characteristically--is, as an etching, grey and colourless. “The

Cambridgeshire Ferry” (of 1881), with that free, swinging, rustic girl

he likes to paint, has excellent points about it, and would be called

“important” by a dealer. Later, “A Cast Shoe” is luminous as well as

elaborate. “Flora”--a print of 1882--is very spirited and rich, and has

the sentiment of the morning. But I am not sure whether the purist in

the etche art would not like most of all the rapid and indicative

sketch of “A Flood in the Fens.” It is a slight study, with the rare

note of action and of tragedy--a free dramatic record.

Mr. Axel Haig, the third of these popular and long accepted artists, has

no painted pictures by whose method he may be inspired--he is unlike

Robert Macbeth in this respect--but his able etchings of architectural

subjects are nearly all of them, nevertheless, finished up to the

corners. So much is actually set forth, with such elaborate and skilled

pains--all the work being perfectly evident, no labour of omission

having been undertaken, and little labour of choice--that the

imagination of the spectator has hardly a chance of exercising itself.

His intelligence, alas! is well-nigh unnecessary. And yet, as you look

at the long record of buildings whose aspect has been grasped and

presented by Mr. Haig with diligence and skill, you must respect, in the

artist, much of his craftsmanship, and his great German quality of

untiring and sagacious effort.

[Illustration: E. A. ARMSTRONG (STANHOPE-FORBES). “THE OPEN

WINDOW.”]

XXIII.

SOME OTHER ETCHERS.

I cannot pretend that the artistic individuality of Elizabeth Armstrong

and Minna Bolingbroke (now Mrs. Stanhope Forbes and Mrs. C. J. Watson)

is yet sufficiently marked to allow either to be the subject of a

critical essay; but in the record of an Art in which--as in so many

others--it seems generally to be decreed to women, “Thus far, and no

further,” it is useful and satisfactory to note the closeness of

observation and the skill of hand possessed by these two ladies. In Miss

Armstrong the world some time ago recognized a particularly dainty

draughtswoman; and the little print which is submitted here as an

example of her talent, is a refined Genre picture. To Genre, too,

belongs that which, so far as I have had the opportunity of knowing, is

the happiest effort of Miss Bolingbroke. It is singularly good; the

subject chosen pluckily, where only a Modern would have ventured to find

it; and then the theme pictorially conceived, in the true etche

spirit--this admirable little dry-point is a vision of the factory,

broad, luminous, and rich. One or two other dry-points by the same

artist--dry-points of plump birds, and live stock of the

farmyard--suggest the possibility that in her quest for themes Miss

Bolingbroke may follow in the track of a great Frenchman, and may meet

with a success akin to some extent to that of Bracquemon masterpiece,

“Le Haut n battant de Porte.”

Mr. Percy Thomas--a graceful draughtsman of ancient English buildings,

and of the incidents of the River--must be reckoned almost as of the Old

Guard, amongst the etchers of the present generation. He etched before

Etching became fashionable; and now that he has long been beset with

friendly and accomplished rivalry, he yet proceeds to make additions to

the bulk, and perhaps even to the range, of his labours. An inequality

more marked than any we are wont to perceive in the work of an important

master, tells, perhaps, to some extent, against his position. And though

his manner is often pretty, and is generally refined, it is but seldom

distinguished. He has worked, it may be, too much, and, it may be, not

always in obedience to the spontaneous prompting. Yet his methods

[Illustration: M. BOLINGBROKE. “AT THE LOOM.”]

[Illustration: PERCY THOMAS. “DORKING.”]

have ever been legitimate, and he has attained grace. His

“Dorking”--with its long perspective of the sunny street in some hour of

the summer afternoon--is a piece of agreeable and capable, and even of

elaborate, sketching; and his “Old Lighthouse, Hastings”--one of the

most entirely satisfactory of his coppers--has the charm of an admirable

composition conveyed by simple and certain means.

Among the other aquafortists practising from time to time amongst

us--not to speak of the more recent of the promising recruits to the

Society of Painter-Etchers, who have yet to make their history--mention

should not be altogether omitted of Mr. W. L. Wyllie, whose popular

marine subjects need evoke no opposition, even where, as exhibitions of

the etche art, they scarcely deserve to attract.

Again, there is Dr. Arthur Evershed, a ready and sensitive draughtsman

with the needle, whose “Marsh Farm” is only one out of a score of

evidences of his refined enjoyment of the quiet lines of uneventful

lowland landscape. Sir Charles Robinson and Dr. Propert need by no means

be forgotten. Mr. J. P. Heseltine has not perhaps exhibited much of

late; but he, as long ago as when he wrought that series of Etchings

Mrs. Noseda published--it was some twenty years since--gave ample proof

of his placid, sympathetic observation of the ordinary land, and of his

ability to record the charm he was not tardy in feeling. The etched work

of Mr. Holmes May is, most of it, I think, more recent. It is a

vigorous, independent sketching of landscape. It notes tree-form with

energy and sky effects with refinement.

That potent, brilliant, but eccentric Spaniard, fashionable naturally

among the younger men for his unquestioned audacity of talent--I mean,

of course, Goya--has been, it would appear, the chief inspirer of a few

clever prints done recently by Mr. Rothenstein, in frank, fantastic

illustration of Voltair “Pucelle rléans.” In Mr. Rothenstei few

things--too few as yet to permit us to really judge him as an etcher--we

see, along with some inventiveness which is the artis own, not only

Goy style, but Goy method--an effective, dexterous mingling of the

etched line with aquatint.

Again, the Whistlerian spirit finds appropriate expression in the

vivacious prints of Mr. Walter Sickert and of Monsieur Roussel--many of

them engaging, interesting, and unconcealed impromptus, towards which

any word of adverse criticism would be but ill-addressed. And, lastly,

ere I turn to treat at greater length the work of one who is a born

etcher, and an etcher

[Illustration: W. HOLMES MAY. “SUNRISE IN WALES.”]

[Illustration: ALFRED EAST. “A HURRYING WIND.”]

chiefly--Monsieur Paul Helleu--let there be brief recognition of the

true artis instinct which caused Mr. Alfred East, our admirable

landscape painter, to record, with the solidity and massiveness so

possible to dry-point, his impression of “A Hurrying Wind.”

XXIV.

HELLEU.

The copper on which some master of etching will, sometimes in an hour,

engrave in dry-point the latest of his conceptions, the newest

impression he has received from the world, is, like the pages of a

draughtsma sketch-book, the revelation of just that thing that

strikes him the most. The character--in a sense, the temperament--of the

artist is betrayed or hinted at by his selection; notwithstanding that

the selection, if the man is wise at all, owes something to his

knowledge of what are the bounds of his capacity. The work of the great

etchers--Rembrandt apart, and he was practically unlimited--shows this.

The subtleties of the figure interested Sir Seymour Haden less than the

curve of a great stream, the light and shade in an old garden, or the

broken surface of a Dorset heath. It is, at least, not emotional

incidents that have been the mainspring of the art of Mr. Whistler; for

he has been

[Illustration: HELLEU. “ÉTUDE DE JEUNE FILLE.”]

inspired by the material that he was readiest to receive. And so in the

work of that brilliant artist in dry-point to whom I turn last of all,

there is evident the sign of his own leanings, the engaging suggestion

of those things in his daily life which he most sympathetically notes.

And M. Helleu is, above all things, the recorder of the beautiful or the

refined interior, with its charm of artistic and harmonious detail--its

charm, above all, of feminine life, or of the life of children.

It is as an artist working in pastels that M. Helleu--a man still in

young middle age--happens to have been longest known. And his pastels

have, not unnaturally, been for the most part portraits. In them he has

evinced, and more, it may be, than in his latest portraits in dry-point,

the skill of the likeness-taker. But likeness-taker merely he has never

aimed to be; the artist has invariably asserted himself, and, if in

nothing else, at least by this or that dexterity of craftsmanship--fine

jugglery of execution. Only four or five years ago did it occur to M.

Helleu to turn to the processes of the engraver, and to sketch rapidly

on copper--he turned to dry-point. He has found in England much

appreciation; he has worked here to some extent; and his contributions

to the Society of Painter-Etchers have been frequent as well as

delightful.

In Paris, M. Helleu was much associated with M. James Tissot, an artist

whom Englishmen knew as an etcher in almost the last generation. To the

association with Tissot--a bold and sometimes graceful recorder of

contemporary life with the etching-needle--is due, I have no doubt, M.

Helle first practice in dry-point. To some extent he has seen the

same world as Tissot, but he has seen it always in his own way, and has

pourtrayed it with a singular economy of means that marks him as the

brother of the greatest in etching. Tissot, with all his virtues of

independence and vigour, has shown little of this economy, nor has he

displayed the peculiar refinement which counts for so much in M.

Helle charm. Briefly, this is a case in which the pupil--if pupil you

can call him--has improved upon the master. It has been given to M.

Tissot to have some share in the formation of a craftsman more subtle, a

poet far more sensitive, than himself.

Up to the present time, some seventy or eighty plates have been executed

by the brilliant and delightful sketcher, M. Tissot to some extent

formed. Scarcely one of them, I think, has involved more than a single

sitting on the part of model or artist. An hour or two of strenuous,

enjoyable, untired labour has sufficed for the production of each

dainty, each masterly, work. In

[Illustration: HELLEU. “FEMME À LA TASSE.”]

an hour or two the lady or the child of M. Helle choice has found

herself recorded on the copper--she and whatever accessories were deemed

desirable to indicate her _milieu_, to place her amidst the surroundings

which assist in the telling of her story. There is not, as far as I am

aware, a single piece of M. Helle that is not a figure subject, and

among his work, so far as it has yet proceeded, I do not recollect a

single portrait of a man. Edmond de Goncourt calls his dry-points “_les

instantanés de la grace de la femme_”--“snap-shots,” shall we translate

it, at the charm of modern womanhood--the womanhood of the

drawing-room--“snap-shots,” not less often, at the charm of refined

childhood. In Helle etched work, the connoisseur will welcome what is

practically the complement of the etched work of Vandyck, who, in his

score or so of plates (wonderful painter though he was of women),

undertook only the portraiture of certain distinguished men.

Helle method of dealing with his subjects is not always, or even very

often, the method of direct portraiture. His conception has a certain

affinity with that of the artist in Genre, in that the model or models,

be they women or children, do not only stand for their portraits, but

are discovered in _poses_ which suggest an incident this moment

happening--be it only the incident of a woman having her hair brushed,

of a girl struggling into her jacket, of a woman stooping forward over

the drawing-room fireplace, of a child playing with its toys. Helle

models are not long stationary, their attitude is never stereotyped;

what he pourtrays mainly is movement now making, or movement only just

arrested. Hence, perhaps, the sense of spontaneity in all the work--the

sense, when you have looked through his plates, that you have been

living in the intimacy of charming people who in their daily ways turn

this way and that, stoop, stretch themselves, smile, get suddenly grave,

dress themselves, lift their eyes inquiringly, or toss the great long

hair upon their shoulders. Their movements, whatever they are, are made

with the immediate freedom, the complete absence of self-consciousness,

of well-bred, natural folk--the folk whose presence, even when they are

not actually handsome, or when no personal affection binds them to you,

gives a legitimate charm to the passing hour. The spectacle of the world

is pleasanter when it is they who are on its stage.

Helle etchings prove him to be in sympathy with the most alert, which

is often also the most dignified and distinguished of modern youthful

beauty. I know of no plate of his in which he has realised the

[Illustration: HELLEU. “LE SALON BLANC.]

dignity of age as Rembrandt realised it in the etched portrait of his

mother smiling, and in that other etched portrait of his mother, with a

black veil and folded hands. But several times Helleu has realised what

Whistler realised in the dry-point of “Fanny Leyland”--the dignified

beauty, the reticent tenderness, the mood, courageous or contemplative,

of the better order of young girlhood. Admirable in this way is that

“Etude de Jeune Fille,” which shows the quick and earnest, fearless

glance--the girl with the lifted elbow and the streaming dark hair.

Hardly less admirable, that other study of a child a little younger, the

head on a large scale, and the head alone. It may be added, as a detail

of both these rare plates, that no others, either by M. Helleu or by any

other etcher, show quite so obvious a mastery in the treatment of hair.

Dry-point, as M. Helleu handles it, would seem to have been made for the

magical suggestion of all that you may notice in hair, except its

colour--of its flow and texture, weight and life.

“Femme à la Tasse,” a study of two uplifted hands, holding between them,

lightly, in the fingers, a porcelain cup out of which the reclining

figure drinks, is a most delicate arrangement of “line,” and of amazing

economy of means. And the “Salon Blanc,” or one especially of the

several plates which bear that name, is to be noted not for the figure

only, not, perhaps, for the figure even chiefly, but for the brief and

dainty suggestions of tasteful furniture, the line of a screen, the

mouldings of a mantelpiece, the curve of a girandole.

Etching in England With 50 illustrations. · 第 3 / 4 段