FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE.

Synonyms. Definition. Susceptible animals: cloven footed, all warm

blooded animals. Historic notes; Geographical distribution; English

invasions in 18th and 19th centuries; North and South American

invasions in 1870; In Asia from immemorial times. Causes: infection in

liquid of vesicles, saliva on pastures, roads, feeding and drinking

places, halters, etc.; from feet on pastures, buildings, yards, roads,

cars, boats, etc.; from teats through milk. Microbe not certainly

known, micrococci, streptococci and bacilli found. Virus inert when

dried 24 hours at 88° F.; survived 9 months at 32° F., attack

immunizes for 5 months; injection of 1 lymph and 2 of blood of immune

renders refractory; filtered lymph still virulent; microbe probably

infinitesimal; accessory causes: movement, mingling of cattle, sheep,

swine, etc., war, trade, common pasturage, infected roads, ships,

yards, halters, etc. Symptoms: incubation 36 hours to 6 days; slight

fever; redness, tenderness of buccal mucosa and teats, grinding teeth,

smacking tongue, tender feet, shaking them backward, bullæ on mouth

and teats, not nodular, nor chambered as in variola, salivation,

bloody, circular or irregular raw sores, vesicles and erosions in

interdigital space, shedding hoofs, sheep walk on knees, gangrenous

mammitis; intestinal eruption and diarrhœa in sucklings. Mortality.

Prognosis; recovery in 15 days, deaths rare if cared for. Losses from

destruction of product and emaciation—occasional abortion. Diagnosis:

based on infection of all exposed bisulcates, localization on mouth,

teats and feet, inoculability on other warm blooded animals,

unchambered vesicles, slight fever, and prompt recovery. Notes of

affection in man. Symptoms in man. Prevention and treatment in man.

Prevention in animals: exclusion of contagion, immediate and mediate;

close infected pastures and roads, stop all movement of bisulcates,

disinfect all boats, cars, places and things exposed, exclude

visitors, guarantees with strange animals, quarantine and disinfect

arrivals, exclude fresh animal products, fodder and litter, wash,

disinfect soiled clothes. Inoculation undesirable. Treatment in

animals: cleanliness, dryness, disinfection, segregate sick and well,

gaseous antiseptics, liquid ointments. Gruels, mashes, sliced, boiled,

or pulped roots. Local dressings for mouth, teats and feet. Evulsion

of hoof. Mammitis.

_Synonyms._ Aphthous fever: Aphtha Epizoötica, Eczema Epizoötica.

_Definition._ An acute infectious disease of the lower animals but

especially of ruminants, characterized by a slight fever and the

eruption of vesicles, or ballæ on the skin and mucosæ, and usually those

of the mouth, feet and teats.

_Susceptible Animals._ The animals that prove the most obnoxious to the

disease are the bisulcates—large and small ruminants and swine. Man

however is susceptible as are also horses, dogs, cats and fowls, when

they are inoculated or fed upon the infected milk or other products. It

is doubtful if any warm-blooded animal enjoys an immunity.

_History, Geographical Distribution._ Toward the middle of the

eighteenth century this disease prevailed in Central Europe and England.

The latter country stamped out both this and the Rinderpest, but it

continued to prevail on the Continent and was re-imported into England

in 1839. It reached America through an importation from England to

Montreal in 1870, but owing to more or less effective quarantine, to the

absence of cattle traffic from east to west, and above all to the

prolonged confinement in yards and stables during our northern winter,

it burnt itself out in the course of the year. In Asia it has prevailed

from time immemorial, and it was imported into South America in 1870.

_Etiology._ This disease has long been known as caused by infection

alone. Excluded from England in the middle of the eighteenth century it

did not appear again until re-imported in the middle of the nineteenth,

and then speedily overran the whole island except the breeding districts

into which strange stock were never taken. In South America it was

unknown until imported from the Old World into the Argentine Republic

and then it made a wide extension and maintained itself where the stock

was kept on unfenced ranches. In our fenced Northeastern states it died

out and has not reappeared.

The infection is especially resident in the vesicles or aphthæ. From the

mouth this is distributed, with the abundant drivelling saliva, on

pastures, roads, feeding and drinking troughs, ponds, streams and

halters, and readily communicates the disease to healthy stock following

in the same places. From the feet and especially the interdigital space,

it is left on the vegetation, buildings, yards, cars, boats and all

other possible media to infect other stock in turn. From the teats it

mingles with the milk so as to infect the young suckling and all animals

and men to whom the milk may be given. It may become dried on litter and

other light objects and carried by the winds, or it may be carried on

the feet of men or animals including birds, but apart from this it is

not readily diffused and oftentimes a broad highway may set a limit to

its propagation.

The infecting microbe is not definitely known. Nosotti found a

micrococcus in the lymph of the vesicle, which stained readily in

aniline colors, was easily cultivated and pathogenic. Klein found a

streptococcus which, similarly tested, presented an equal claim to be

the causative factor. Bassianus and Siegel found in the blood and

tissues of a person who died of foot and mouth disease a small oval

bacillus, which they later obtained from the vesicles of three children

who were suffering from the disease, and from animals attacked in two

successive epizoötics. With this they first successfully inoculated a

calf and from the pure cultures obtained from its blood, inoculated

three calves and a young pig.

Löffler and Frosch, the recent commission on foot and mouth disease in

Germany, report that no organisms could be seen nor cultivated from the

lymph found in recent bullæ of the buccal mucosa, though this lymph

proved virulent when inoculated on calves.

They found that the lymph became inert when dried for 24 hours at 31° C.

(88° F.), while it retained its vitality and virulence after exposure

for 9 months to a temperature of 0° C. They concluded that it could not

penetrate through the unbroken skin nor mucosa, and that it was most

effective when injected into the blood or peritoneal cavity. One attack

conferred immunity for 5 months. Blood from immune animals, injected

into susceptible ones, does not confer immunity, but 75 per cent. could

be rendered immune if injected with a mixture of the lymph from the

vesicle and double the same amount of the blood from the immune animal.

Animals so treated become immune to 100 times the infecting dose.

Filtered lymph was still virulent and the commission suggests that the

microbe may be so small as to pass through the filter, and escape

discovery by the most powerful lenses. An object one fifth the size of

the smallest known bacillus—that of influenza—would be invisible under

our best microscope.

By actual experiment the virus has been found in the nose, larynx,

bronchia, stomach and intestines, but into all these the virulent lymph

of the bullæ can find its way. In the intestines, indeed, in cases

caused by feeding, bullæ have been found on the mucosa.

A most important question would be that of the virulence of the milk,

but inasmuch as the vesicles appear on the teats and even on the

openings of the milk ducts, and in bursting discharge their contents

with the milk into the pail, the milk becomes per force infecting. The

experiment of Hertwig and his students who infected themselves by

drinking the warm milk by way of experiment, has been often repeated

unwittingly by unwilling victims, and the many cases of calves, pigs and

chickens contracting the disease by consuming the otherwise discarded

milk leaves no room for doubt that this product is often infecting.

Among conditions contributing to a spread of infection, nothing is more

potent than a free movement of ruminants, and swine whether determined

by war, trade, or the intermingling of different herds on commons or

unfenced ranges. In infected countries, in which cattle are distributed

through large central markets there is always a wide extension after one

of these fairs, the infection being narrowly circumscribed to herds

receiving cattle from the fair, or those that have travelled on the same

roads or fields after the market cattle. It has repeatedly happened that

cattle shipped from the United States, where this disease has long been

unknown, have been found diseased on their arrival at a British port,

simply because they have been tied upon the passage with halters

formerly used on infected Irish or Continental stock.

_Symptoms in animals._ There is first a period of incubation shorter in

hot than in cold weather and varying from 36 hours to 6 days

(exceptionally 15 days). It is altogether probable that prolonged

incubation is really delayed infection, the virus having been attached

to the feet for some time before it entered the tissues. Cattle usually

show the disease two days after exposure in a public market, building or

conveyance.

There is first moderate hyperthermia (102° to 103° F.), indicated by the

clinical thermometer before there is any outward sign of ill health.

There may be erection of the hair, tremors or distinct shivering,

dryness and heat of the muzzle, redness and even tenderness of the

buccal mucosa and teats, saliva drivels from the mouth or may show as a

frothy mass at the commissures or margins of the lips, and there may be

grinding of the teeth and a peculiar smacking of the tongue and hard

palate which may be heard at a considerable distance. There are greatly

impaired appetite and rumination. Tenderness of the feet is shown by

halting or lameness and by the extension backward and shaking of the

hind feet in turn.

With the appearance of the eruption, usually on the second day of

illness, the fever as a rule moderates, and on examination of the mouth

bullæ of ⅓d. to 1 inch in diameter may be found on the inside of the

lips, and cheeks, or on the palate and tongue, with, in many cases, a

congested areola, but showing no nodule as in variola. These bullæ may

extend to the muzzle, pituitary membrane or pharynx. They burst very

soon after their formation, exposing a red base of inflamed corium, with

a clearly rounded margin, or, at first, with shreds of the torn

epithelial covering. The salivation now becomes more profuse, glairy and

even bloody, and there is more active movement of the tongue. When the

bullæ have been confluent there are formed extensive red patches denuded

of epithelium, and the suffering causes a complete but temporary

dysphagia. The renewal of the epithelium, however, takes place promptly

and may be well advanced in four or five days. Upon the teats the bullæ

appear at about the same time but are usually smaller than the buccal,

and do not show the thickened base of cow pox. They burst in 36 to 48

hours unless broken earlier by the hands of the milker, forming sores

comparable to those of the mouth, which are liable to be kept up by the

necessary manipulations in milking.

Upon the feet the eruption shows especially in the interdigital space,

at first as vesicles smaller than those of the mouth and teats, leaving

erosions and ulcers which extend under the adjacent horn, and upward on

the front and back of the pastern. From exposure to mud and filth these

are liable to be kept up even longer than those of the mouth and teats,

and under neglect the entire hoof is often shed. In sheep and swine the

disease may be localized almost exclusively in the feet. Sheep will even

walk on the knees.

In young animals and those fed on the milk, the eruption may take place

on the intestinal mucosa with violent congestion, diarrhœa and a fatal

issue. Aggravated cases may show gangrenous mammitis or abortions.

_Mortality and Prognosis._ While there are seasons of special pathogenic

severity, yet as a rule, the foot and mouth disease is a mild affection

and unless neglected, the patients entirely recover in about fifteen

days. The pecuniary loss in dairy and feeding cattle has been found to

average in Great Britain about $10 per head, and as few animals escape,

the consequences are usually very serious. In England the losses from

this disease in 1883 reached $5,000,000, in France, those of 1871 were

$7,500,000 and in Switzerland, $2,500,000. In Germany, over 7,000,000

animals suffered from 1889–94.

_Differential Diagnosis._ While a mistake might be made in an isolated

case, such a thing should be absolutely impossible where cattle and

other animals are collected in herds. The rapid infection of the whole

herd, the implication of sheep and swine along with the cattle, and the

eruption of the characteristic bullæ on the mouth, feet and udder or on

two of these locations to the exclusion of the rest of the body, is not

likely to be counterfeited by another disease. An outbreak of gangrenous

ergotism in Kansas, Missouri and Illinois in the spring of 1884, was

pronounced to be foot and mouth disease by a number of veterinarians,

including an expert sent by the Government of Canada. On behalf of the

U. S. Treasury I investigated the disease, which caused in many cases

sores on the mouths and feet, but it spared all sheep and swine, could

not be conveyed to them nor to new born calves by inoculation, and in

many cases it caused gangrene of all the tissues, soft and hard, and

separation of the limb at a given point, often near the tarsus. The

quarantines were raised, the disease made no further extension, and the

existing panic subsided.

_Infection of Man._ The first authentic record of this affection in man

we owe to Valentin, who records that during the outbreak in Hesse in

1695 men suffered from inflammation of the gums, tongue and mouth.

Michel Sagar says, that in 1764 men who drank the milk were affected

with aphtha. In 1828 it was conveyed from animals to men in Bohemia

(Nadberny), in Styria (Levitsky) and Wurtemberg (Kolb). In 1834, three

veterinarians, Hertwig, Mann and Villain, voluntarily drank a quart each

of the warm milk of a cow suffering from this affection. On the second

day Hertwig suffered from fever, headache and itching of the hands and

fingers. Five days later bullæ formed on the hands and fingers, the

tongue, cheeks and lips. In the two others the eruption was confined to

the buccal mucosa. Since that time records of the infection of human

beings have been very numerous. During the American epizoötic of 1870 I

met with the case of a farmer at South Dover, N. Y., who suffered from

sore mouth and blisters along the margin of the tongue from drinking the

milk. The danger is greatest in children on an exclusive milk diet and

who drink it warm. Kolb in 1828, noticed acid vomiting and diarrhœa in

such subjects, Hübner observed that beside the buccal eruption such

children often suffered from inflammation of the stomach and bowels and

that very young children fed on the milk of the diseased cows died.

Balfour, Watson and others have noticed similar results in Scotland.

Allbutt saw the buccal eruption in three children in Yorkshire, England,

during the local prevalence of the English epizoötic in 1883, and

secured information of a number of other cases in the same district.

A number of cases were recorded during 1893 in Germany. A shepherd

infected himself by holding in his mouth the knife with which he had

pared the diseased feet of sheep, and another workman and a veterinarian

had extensive eruptions on the hands after dressing the affected feet. A

number of milk-maids were infected by milking, the eruption appearing on

the hands, and in one case on the breast. A child fed on the milk of

diseased cows, had chill and fever with gastric disturbance, and later

an eruption of vesicles on the lips and tongue and between the fingers

and toes.

Again, in 1895, during the prevalence of foot and mouth disease in the

southern part of Berlin, a considerable number of the milk consumers

suffered from fever with the eruption of bullæ on the tongue and buccal

mucosa generally, which on early bursting left very painful ulcerations.

The acute disease did not last more than five days, but left a sense of

great weakness for a time. Virchow, who made an investigation,

unhesitatingly pronounced it to be foot and mouth disease.

Cases of infection through butter made from infected milk are on record.

A Berlin veterinary student suffered from the buccal eruption and

erysipelatoid swelling of the ear, and a German clergyman had in

addition a period of chilliness, fever, diarrhœa and pruritus. Similarly

Schneider quotes cases determined by infected cheese, and Friedberger

and Fröhner, cases caused by virulent buttermilk.

_Symptoms in Man._ In man there is observed the tendency to localization

on the same points as in animals. As the hands are naturally exposed to

infection by milking or treating the diseased animals, they are

especially obnoxious to the eruption, and the same is true of the mouth

when the infected milk or other dairy products are consumed. The bullæ

on the buccal mucosa are generally confluent, and often extend to the

fauces and pharynx, rendering speech difficult and swallowing painful,

and leaving extensive and painful sores which, however, soon heal up. In

women the bullæ have been seen around the congested nipples, and in

exceptional cases they have been generally diffused over the body.

In cases due to drinking the milk, the early febrile symptoms are liable

to be accompanied or followed by nausea, anorexia, abdominal pain and

diarrhœa, and still later by the cutaneous and buccal eruption.

The duration of the disease is from 10 to 15 days and as a rule no

permanent scars are left on the skin or mucous membranes.

The _diagnosis_ is assisted by the knowledge of the prevalence of the

disease in herds in the district, and that the patient has handled the

diseased animals, or drunk their milk, or eaten their butter or cheese

products. The predilection of the eruption for the fingers, the roots of

the nails and the mouth is very significant. The disease follows an

acute course and convalescence is complete in ten or fifteen days, which

serves to differentiate it from most skin eruptions. From variola which

pursues an equally rapid course it is distinguished by the absence of

the primary nodular swelling, and of the septa or pillars that divide

the mature pock into independent chambers.

_Prophylactics._ The best prevention for man is to exclude the disease

from the country and its herds as is now the case in the United States.

When the disease does exist in herds the attendants should cauterize any

sores on the hands, and wash the hands with an antiseptic, such as a 10

per cent. carbolic acid solution, after handling the diseased. The milk

and its manufactured products—butter and cheese—should be withheld from

consumption until after the herd has recovered. Infection can be

obviated by boiling the milk.

_Treatment._ The disease follows a rapid course and is self-limiting,

and usually benign so that active treatment is not urgently demanded.

The local lesions are best met by non-poisonous antiseptics, such as:

borax in powder or strong solution; boric acid (4:100); sodium

hyposulphite (½ oz. 1 qt.); chlorate of potash (½ oz. to 1 quart);

salicylic acid (1:100); or salicylate of soda. Pounded ice may be used

as a soothing agent. The cutaneous lesions may be wrapped in cloth wet

with one or other of the antiseptic lotions. Any disposition to ulcerate

may be met by the stick of silver nitrate.

Slightly laxative or diuretic agents may be employed for their febrifuge

and eliminating properties and the food should be light, easily

digestible and given cold.

_Prevention in Animals._ When the disease exists in a country or

district this includes all measures preventive of immediate or mediate

contagion. Arrest of all movement of cloven footed animals in infected

districts, disinfection of cars, boats and other conveyances, of

markets, yards, highways, seclusion of infected herds and pastures,

exclusion of visitors, disinfection of products, certificates of

soundness of origin, thorough disinfection after recovery of the herd,

such are the leading points to attend to. Inspection or closure of fairs

and markets is desirable and any exposure of diseased or infected

animals should be visited with heavy penalty, in addition to the cost of

detention and supervision. For a noninfected country a certificate and

guarantee of non-exposure with each cloven-footed animal imported, and

of thorough disinfection of the cars, boats, halters or other objects

used upon them, and of the places, fodder and litter supplied, together

with a quarantine (1 week) and surface disinfection should be required

under penalty. Exclusion of fresh hides, bones, guts, hair, bristles,

wool, horn, as well as of fodder and litter is essential. Cattle

attendants, drivers and others whose clothes are soiled with the

products of the barn, should have the same washed and disinfected.

Inoculation has been proposed, and even practiced to pass a whole herd

promptly through the malady, but as immunity lasts but three months, and

the attendant risks to other herds are greatly encreased it is at once

an economic blunder, and a great injury to adjoining owners. Any

resulting extension to other herds should be an occasion for a verdict

for damages at common law.

_Treatment in Animals._ Provision is first made against extension of the

infection. The floor should be kept clean, dry and covered with sawdust,

tan bark, gypsum or litter sprinkled with these or with phenic acid. The

herd should be divided into two lots—the apparently sound, and unsound

kept strictly apart under separate attendants, above all separate

milkers. As soon as any symptoms are shown by an animal in the sound

enclosure it must be instantly transferred to the other and its stall

disinfected. Antiseptics such as gaseous iodine (two tablespoonful of

tincture of iodine, thrown into a quart of boiling water twice daily),

sulphurous acid, salicylic acid, creolin, lysol or other ointment on the

feet and teats, may also be used. In this way it may be possible to save

a number from an attack, yet most commonly the exposure is common and

universal and the malady develops in all simultaneously. For those

already attacked, gruels, mashes, and cool pulped, finely sliced or

boiled roots may be all that is required, the disease runs its course

and recovery ensues in 15 days. As local dressings the following may

serve as examples: for the mouth, borax, chlorate of potash, salicylate

or sulphite of soda 2 drs. to 1 quart water; phenic acid, creolin, or

lysol, one or two teaspoonfuls to a quart; for the foot, clean the

interdigital space and apply tar and carbolic acid with bandage, or use

solutions of creolin, lysol, pyoktanin or blue-stone; in aggravated

cases strong mineral acids with tar; for the teats, ointments of boric

or salicylic acid, creolin, lysol, naphthalin or napthol. Separation of

the hoof or mammitis will require treatment according to indications.

Text book of veterinary medicine, Volume 4 (of 5) · 第 71 / 144 题