SELF-RELIANCE

I read the other day some verses written by an eminent painter which

were original and not conventional. The soul always hears an admonition

in such lines, let the subject be what it may. The sentiment they

instil is of more value than any thought they may contain. To believe

your own thought, to believe that what is true for you in your private

heart is true for all men,—that is genius. Speak your latent

conviction, and it shall be the universal sense; for the inmost in due

time becomes the outmost, and our first thought is rendered back to us

by the trumpets of the Last Judgment. Familiar as the voice of the mind

is to each, the highest merit we ascribe to Moses, Plato and Milton is

that they set at naught books and traditions, and spoke not what men,

but what _they_ thought. A man should learn to detect and watch that

gleam of light which flashes across his mind from within, more than the

lustre of the firmament of bards and sages. Yet he dismisses without

notice his thought, because it is his. In every work of genius we

recognize our own rejected thoughts; they come back to us with a

certain alienated majesty. Great works of art have no more affecting

lesson for us than this. They teach us to abide by our spontaneous

impression with good-humored inflexibility then most when the whole cry

of voices is on the other side. Else to-morrow a stranger will say with

masterly good sense precisely what we have thought and felt all the

time, and we shall be forced to take with shame our own opinion from

another.

There is a time in every man’s education when he arrives at the

conviction that envy is ignorance; that imitation is suicide; that he

must take himself for better for worse as his portion; that though the

wide universe is full of good, no kernel of nourishing corn can come to

him but through his toil bestowed on that plot of ground which is given

to him to till. The power which resides in him is new in nature, and

none but he knows what that is which he can do, nor does he know until

he has tried. Not for nothing one face, one character, one fact, makes

much impression on him, and another none. This sculpture in the memory

is not without preestablished harmony. The eye was placed where one ray

should fall, that it might testify of that particular ray. We but half

express ourselves, and are ashamed of that divine idea which each of us

represents. It may be safely trusted as proportionate and of good

issues, so it be faithfully imparted, but God will not have his work

made manifest by cowards. A man is relieved and gay when he has put his

heart into his work and done his best; but what he has said or done

otherwise shall give him no peace. It is a deliverance which does not

deliver. In the attempt his genius deserts him; no muse befriends; no

invention, no hope.

Trust thyself: every heart vibrates to that iron string. Accept the

place the divine providence has found for you, the society of your

contemporaries, the connection of events. Great men have always done

so, and confided themselves childlike to the genius of their age,

betraying their perception that the absolutely trustworthy was seated

at their heart, working through their hands, predominating in all their

being. And we are now men, and must accept in the highest mind the same

transcendent destiny; and not minors and invalids in a protected

corner, not cowards fleeing before a revolution, but guides, redeemers

and benefactors, obeying the Almighty effort and advancing on Chaos and

the Dark.

What pretty oracles nature yields us on this text in the face and

behavior of children, babes, and even brutes! That divided and rebel

mind, that distrust of a sentiment because our arithmetic has computed

the strength and means opposed to our purpose, these have not. Their

mind being whole, their eye is as yet unconquered, and when we look in

their faces we are disconcerted. Infancy conforms to nobody; all

conform to it; so that one babe commonly makes four or five out of the

adults who prattle and play to it. So God has armed youth and puberty

and manhood no less with its own piquancy and charm, and made it

enviable and gracious and its claims not to be put by, if it will stand

by itself. Do not think the youth has no force, because he cannot speak

to you and me. Hark! in the next room his voice is sufficiently clear

and emphatic. It seems he knows how to speak to his contemporaries.

Bashful or bold then, he will know how to make us seniors very

unnecessary.

The nonchalance of boys who are sure of a dinner, and would disdain as

much as a lord to do or say aught to conciliate one, is the healthy

attitude of human nature. A boy is in the parlor what the pit is in the

playhouse; independent, irresponsible, looking out from his corner on

such people and facts as pass by, he tries and sentences them on their

merits, in the swift, summary way of boys, as good, bad, interesting,

silly, eloquent, troublesome. He cumbers himself never about

consequences, about interests; he gives an independent, genuine

verdict. You must court him; he does not court you. But the man is as

it were clapped into jail by his consciousness. As soon as he has once

acted or spoken with _éclat_ he is a committed person, watched by the

sympathy or the hatred of hundreds, whose affections must now enter

into his account. There is no Lethe for this. Ah, that he could pass

again into his neutrality! Who can thus avoid all pledges and, having

observed, observe again from the same unaffected, unbiased, unbribable,

unaffrighted innocence,—must always be formidable. He would utter

opinions on all passing affairs, which being seen to be not private but

necessary, would sink like darts into the ear of men and put them in

fear.

These are the voices which we hear in solitude, but they grow faint and

inaudible as we enter into the world. Society everywhere is in

conspiracy against the manhood of every one of its members. Society is

a joint-stock company, in which the members agree, for the better

securing of his bread to each shareholder, to surrender the liberty and

culture of the eater. The virtue in most request is conformity.

Self-reliance is its aversion. It loves not realities and creators, but

names and customs.

Whoso would be a man, must be a nonconformist. He who would gather

immortal palms must not be hindered by the name of goodness, but must

explore if it be goodness. Nothing is at last sacred but the integrity

of your own mind. Absolve you to yourself, and you shall have the

suffrage of the world. I remember an answer which when quite young I

was prompted to make to a valued adviser who was wont to importune me

with the dear old doctrines of the church. On my saying, “What have I

to do with the sacredness of traditions, if I live wholly from within?”

my friend suggested,—“But these impulses may be from below, not from

above.” I replied, “They do not seem to me to be such; but if I am the

Devil’s child, I will live then from the Devil.” No law can be sacred

to me but that of my nature. Good and bad are but names very readily

transferable to that or this; the only right is what is after my

constitution; the only wrong what is against it. A man is to carry

himself in the presence of all opposition as if every thing were

titular and ephemeral but he. I am ashamed to think how easily we

capitulate to badges and names, to large societies and dead

institutions. Every decent and well-spoken individual affects and sways

me more than is right. I ought to go upright and vital, and speak the

rude truth in all ways. If malice and vanity wear the coat of

philanthropy, shall that pass? If an angry bigot assumes this bountiful

cause of Abolition, and comes to me with his last news from Barbadoes,

why should I not say to him, ‘Go love thy infant; love thy

wood-chopper; be good-natured and modest; have that grace; and never

varnish your hard, uncharitable ambition with this incredible

tenderness for black folk a thousand miles off. Thy love afar is spite

at home.’ Rough and graceless would be such greeting, but truth is

handsomer than the affectation of love. Your goodness must have some

edge to it,—else it is none. The doctrine of hatred must be preached,

as the counteraction of the doctrine of love, when that pules and

whines. I shun father and mother and wife and brother when my genius

calls me. I would write on the lintels of the door-post, _Whim_. I hope

it is somewhat better than whim at last, but we cannot spend the day in

explanation. Expect me not to show cause why I seek or why I exclude

company. Then again, do not tell me, as a good man did to-day, of my

obligation to put all poor men in good situations. Are they _my_ poor?

I tell thee thou foolish philanthropist that I grudge the dollar, the

dime, the cent, I give to such men as do not belong to me and to whom I

do not belong. There is a class of persons to whom by all spiritual

affinity I am bought and sold; for them I will go to prison if need be;

but your miscellaneous popular charities; the education at college of

fools; the building of meeting-houses to the vain end to which many now

stand; alms to sots, and the thousand-fold Relief Societies;—though I

confess with shame I sometimes succumb and give the dollar, it is a

wicked dollar which by and by I shall have the manhood to withhold.

Virtues are, in the popular estimate, rather the exception than the

rule. There is the man _and_ his virtues. Men do what is called a good

action, as some piece of courage or charity, much as they would pay a

fine in expiation of daily non-appearance on parade. Their works are

done as an apology or extenuation of their living in the world,—as

invalids and the insane pay a high board. Their virtues are penances. I

do not wish to expiate, but to live. My life is for itself and not for

a spectacle. I much prefer that it should be of a lower strain, so it

be genuine and equal, than that it should be glittering and unsteady. I

wish it to be sound and sweet, and not to need diet and bleeding. I ask

primary evidence that you are a man, and refuse this appeal from the

man to his actions. I know that for myself it makes no difference

whether I do or forbear those actions which are reckoned excellent. I

cannot consent to pay for a privilege where I have intrinsic right. Few

and mean as my gifts may be, I actually am, and do not need for my own

assurance or the assurance of my fellows any secondary testimony.

What I must do is all that concerns me, not what the people think. This

rule, equally arduous in actual and in intellectual life, may serve for

the whole distinction between greatness and meanness. It is the harder

because you will always find those who think they know what is your

duty better than you know it. It is easy in the world to live after the

world’s opinion; it is easy in solitude to live after our own; but the

great man is he who in the midst of the crowd keeps with perfect

sweetness the independence of solitude.

The objection to conforming to usages that have become dead to you is

that it scatters your force. It loses your time and blurs the

impression of your character. If you maintain a dead church, contribute

to a dead Bible-society, vote with a great party either for the

government or against it, spread your table like base

housekeepers,—under all these screens I have difficulty to detect the

precise man you are: and of course so much force is withdrawn from your

proper life. But do your work, and I shall know you. Do your work, and

you shall reinforce yourself. A man must consider what a

blindman’s-buff is this game of conformity. If I know your sect, I

anticipate your argument. I hear a preacher announce for his text and

topic the expediency of one of the institutions of his church. Do I not

know beforehand that not possibly can he say a new and spontaneous

word? Do I not know that with all this ostentation of examining the

grounds of the institution he will do no such thing? Do I not know that

he is pledged to himself not to look but at one side, the permitted

side, not as a man, but as a parish minister? He is a retained

attorney, and these airs of the bench are the emptiest affectation.

Well, most men have bound their eyes with one or another handkerchief,

and attached themselves to some one of these communities of opinion.

This conformity makes them not false in a few particulars, authors of a

few lies, but false in all particulars. Their every truth is not quite

true. Their two is not the real two, their four not the real four; so

that every word they say chagrins us and we know not where to begin to

set them right. Meantime nature is not slow to equip us in the

prison-uniform of the party to which we adhere. We come to wear one cut

of face and figure, and acquire by degrees the gentlest asinine

expression. There is a mortifying experience in particular, which does

not fail to wreak itself also in the general history; I mean “the

foolish face of praise,” the forced smile which we put on in company

where we do not feel at ease in answer to conversation which does not

interest us. The muscles, not spontaneously moved but moved by a low

usurping wilfulness, grow tight about the outline of the face with the

most disagreeable sensation.

For nonconformity the world whips you with its displeasure. And

therefore a man must know how to estimate a sour face. The by-standers

look askance on him in the public street or in the friend’s parlor. If

this aversation had its origin in contempt and resistance like his own

he might well go home with a sad countenance; but the sour faces of the

multitude, like their sweet faces, have no deep cause, but are put on

and off as the wind blows and a newspaper directs. Yet is the

discontent of the multitude more formidable than that of the senate and

the college. It is easy enough for a firm man who knows the world to

brook the rage of the cultivated classes. Their rage is decorous and

prudent, for they are timid, as being very vulnerable themselves. But

when to their feminine rage the indignation of the people is added,

when the ignorant and the poor are aroused, when the unintelligent

brute force that lies at the bottom of society is made to growl and

mow, it needs the habit of magnanimity and religion to treat it godlike

as a trifle of no concernment.

The other terror that scares us from self-trust is our consistency; a

reverence for our past act or word because the eyes of others have no

other data for computing our orbit than our past acts, and we are loath

to disappoint them.

But why should you keep your head over your shoulder? Why drag about

this corpse of your memory, lest you contradict somewhat you have

stated in this or that public place? Suppose you should contradict

yourself; what then? It seems to be a rule of wisdom never to rely on

your memory alone, scarcely even in acts of pure memory, but to bring

the past for judgment into the thousand-eyed present, and live ever in

a new day. In your metaphysics you have denied personality to the

Deity, yet when the devout motions of the soul come, yield to them

heart and life, though they should clothe God with shape and color.

Leave your theory, as Joseph his coat in the hand of the harlot, and

flee.

A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by

little statesmen and philosophers and divines. With consistency a great

soul has simply nothing to do. He may as well concern himself with his

shadow on the wall. Speak what you think now in hard words and

to-morrow speak what to-morrow thinks in hard words again, though it

contradict every thing you said to-day.—‘Ah, so you shall be sure to be

misunderstood.’—Is it so bad then to be misunderstood? Pythagoras was

misunderstood, and Socrates, and Jesus, and Luther, and Copernicus, and

Galileo, and Newton, and every pure and wise spirit that ever took

flesh. To be great is to be misunderstood.

I suppose no man can violate his nature. All the sallies of his will

are rounded in by the law of his being, as the inequalities of Andes

and Himmaleh are insignificant in the curve of the sphere. Nor does it

matter how you gauge and try him. A character is like an acrostic or

Alexandrian stanza;—read it forward, backward, or across, it still

spells the same thing. In this pleasing contrite wood-life which God

allows me, let me record day by day my honest thought without prospect

or retrospect, and, I cannot doubt, it will be found symmetrical,

though I mean it not and see it not. My book should smell of pines and

resound with the hum of insects. The swallow over my window should

interweave that thread or straw he carries in his bill into my web

also. We pass for what we are. Character teaches above our wills. Men

imagine that they communicate their virtue or vice only by overt

actions, and do not see that virtue or vice emit a breath every moment.

There will be an agreement in whatever variety of actions, so they be

each honest and natural in their hour. For of one will, the actions

will be harmonious, however unlike they seem. These varieties are lost

sight of at a little distance, at a little height of thought. One

tendency unites them all. The voyage of the best ship is a zigzag line

of a hundred tacks. See the line from a sufficient distance, and it

straightens itself to the average tendency. Your genuine action will

explain itself and will explain your other genuine actions. Your

conformity explains nothing. Act singly, and what you have already done

singly will justify you now. Greatness appeals to the future. If I can

be firm enough to-day to do right and scorn eyes, I must have done so

much right before as to defend me now. Be it how it will, do right now.

Always scorn appearances and you always may. The force of character is

cumulative. All the foregone days of virtue work their health into

this. What makes the majesty of the heroes of the senate and the field,

which so fills the imagination? The consciousness of a train of great

days and victories behind. They shed an united light on the advancing

actor. He is attended as by a visible escort of angels. That is it

which throws thunder into Chatham’s voice, and dignity into

Washington’s port, and America into Adams’s eye. Honor is venerable to

us because it is no ephemera. It is always ancient virtue. We worship

it to-day because it is not of to-day. We love it and pay it homage

because it is not a trap for our love and homage, but is

self-dependent, self-derived, and therefore of an old immaculate

pedigree, even if shown in a young person.

I hope in these days we have heard the last of conformity and

consistency. Let the words be gazetted and ridiculous henceforward.

Instead of the gong for dinner, let us hear a whistle from the Spartan

fife. Let us never bow and apologize more. A great man is coming to eat

at my house. I do not wish to please him; I wish that he should wish to

please me. I will stand here for humanity, and though I would make it

kind, I would make it true. Let us affront and reprimand the smooth

mediocrity and squalid contentment of the times, and hurl in the face

of custom and trade and office, the fact which is the upshot of all

history, that there is a great responsible Thinker and Actor working

wherever a man works; that a true man belongs to no other time or

place, but is the centre of things. Where he is, there is nature. He

measures you and all men and all events. Ordinarily, every body in

society reminds us of somewhat else, or of some other person.

Character, reality, reminds you of nothing else; it takes place of the

whole creation. The man must be so much that he must make all

circumstances indifferent. Every true man is a cause, a country, and an

age; requires infinite spaces and numbers and time fully to accomplish

his design;—and posterity seem to follow his steps as a train of

clients. A man Cæsar is born, and for ages after we have a Roman

Empire. Christ is born, and millions of minds so grow and cleave to his

genius that he is confounded with virtue and the possible of man. An

institution is the lengthened shadow of one man; as, Monachism, of the

Hermit Antony; the Reformation, of Luther; Quakerism, of Fox;

Methodism, of Wesley; Abolition, of Clarkson. Scipio, Milton called

“the height of Rome”; and all history resolves itself very easily into

the biography of a few stout and earnest persons.

Let a man then know his worth, and keep things under his feet. Let him

not peep or steal, or skulk up and down with the air of a charity-boy,

a bastard, or an interloper in the world which exists for him. But the

man in the street, finding no worth in himself which corresponds to the

force which built a tower or sculptured a marble god, feels poor when

he looks on these. To him a palace, a statue, or a costly book have an

alien and forbidding air, much like a gay equipage, and seem to say

like that, ‘Who are you, Sir?’ Yet they all are his, suitors for his

notice, petitioners to his faculties that they will come out and take

possession. The picture waits for my verdict; it is not to command me,

but I am to settle its claims to praise. That popular fable of the sot

who was picked up dead drunk in the street, carried to the duke’s

house, washed and dressed and laid in the duke’s bed, and, on his

waking, treated with all obsequious ceremony like the duke, and assured

that he had been insane, owes its popularity to the fact that it

symbolizes so well the state of man, who is in the world a sort of sot,

but now and then wakes up, exercises his reason and finds himself a

true prince.

Our reading is mendicant and sycophantic. In history our imagination

plays us false. Kingdom and lordship, power and estate, are a gaudier

vocabulary than private John and Edward in a small house and common

day’s work; but the things of life are the same to both; the sum total

of both is the same. Why all this deference to Alfred and Scanderbeg

and Gustavus? Suppose they were virtuous; did they wear out virtue? As

great a stake depends on your private act to-day, as followed their

public and renowned steps. When private men shall act with original

views, the lustre will be transferred from the actions of kings to

those of gentlemen.

The world has been instructed by its kings, who have so magnetized the

eyes of nations. It has been taught by this colossal symbol the mutual

reverence that is due from man to man. The joyful loyalty with which

men have everywhere suffered the king, the noble, or the great

proprietor to walk among them by a law of his own, make his own scale

of men and things and reverse theirs, pay for benefits not with money

but with honor, and represent the law in his person, was the

hieroglyphic by which they obscurely signified their consciousness of

their own right and comeliness, the right of every man.

The magnetism which all original action exerts is explained when we

inquire the reason of self-trust. Who is the Trustee? What is the

aboriginal Self, on which a universal reliance may be grounded? What is

the nature and power of that science-baffling star, without parallax,

without calculable elements, which shoots a ray of beauty even into

trivial and impure actions, if the least mark of independence appear?

The inquiry leads us to that source, at once the essence of genius, of

virtue, and of life, which we call Spontaneity or Instinct. We denote

this primary wisdom as Intuition, whilst all later teachings are

tuitions. In that deep force, the last fact behind which analysis

cannot go, all things find their common origin. For the sense of being

which in calm hours rises, we know not how, in the soul, is not diverse

from things, from space, from light, from time, from man, but one with

them and proceeds obviously from the same source whence their life and

being also proceed. We first share the life by which things exist and

afterwards see them as appearances in nature and forget that we have

shared their cause. Here is the fountain of action and of thought. Here

are the lungs of that inspiration which giveth man wisdom and which

cannot be denied without impiety and atheism. We lie in the lap of

immense intelligence, which makes us receivers of its truth and organs

of its activity. When we discern justice, when we discern truth, we do

nothing of ourselves, but allow a passage to its beams. If we ask

whence this comes, if we seek to pry into the soul that causes, all

philosophy is at fault. Its presence or its absence is all we can

affirm. Every man discriminates between the voluntary acts of his mind

and his involuntary perceptions, and knows that to his involuntary

perceptions a perfect faith is due. He may err in the expression of

them, but he knows that these things are so, like day and night, not to

be disputed. My wilful actions and acquisitions are but roving;—the

idlest reverie, the faintest native emotion, command my curiosity and

respect. Thoughtless people contradict as readily the statement of

perceptions as of opinions, or rather much more readily; for they do

not distinguish between perception and notion. They fancy that I choose

to see this or that thing. But perception is not whimsical, but fatal.

If I see a trait, my children will see it after me, and in course of

time all mankind,—although it may chance that no one has seen it before

me. For my perception of it is as much a fact as the sun.

The relations of the soul to the divine spirit are so pure that it is

profane to seek to interpose helps. It must be that when God speaketh

he should communicate, not one thing, but all things; should fill the

world with his voice; should scatter forth light, nature, time, souls,

from the centre of the present thought; and new date and new create the

whole. Whenever a mind is simple and receives a divine wisdom, old

things pass away,—means, teachers, texts, temples fall; it lives now,

and absorbs past and future into the present hour. All things are made

sacred by relation to it,—one as much as another. All things are

dissolved to their centre by their cause, and in the universal miracle

petty and particular miracles disappear. If therefore a man claims to

know and speak of God and carries you backward to the phraseology of

some old mouldered nation in another country, in another world, believe

him not. Is the acorn better than the oak which is its fulness and

completion? Is the parent better than the child into whom he has cast

his ripened being? Whence then this worship of the past? The centuries

are conspirators against the sanity and authority of the soul. Time and

space are but physiological colors which the eye makes, but the soul is

light: where it is, is day; where it was, is night; and history is an

impertinence and an injury if it be any thing more than a cheerful

apologue or parable of my being and becoming.

Man is timid and apologetic; he is no longer upright; he dares not say

‘I think,’ ‘I am,’ but quotes some saint or sage. He is ashamed before

the blade of grass or the blowing rose. These roses under my window

make no reference to former roses or to better ones; they are for what

they are; they exist with God to-day. There is no time to them. There

is simply the rose; it is perfect in every moment of its existence.

Before a leaf-bud has burst, its whole life acts; in the full-blown

flower there is no more; in the leafless root there is no less. Its

nature is satisfied and it satisfies nature in all moments alike. But

man postpones or remembers; he does not live in the present, but with

reverted eye laments the past, or, heedless of the riches that surround

him, stands on tiptoe to foresee the future. He cannot be happy and

strong until he too lives with nature in the present, above time.

This should be plain enough. Yet see what strong intellects dare not

yet hear God himself unless he speak the phraseology of I know not what

David, or Jeremiah, or Paul. We shall not always set so great a price

on a few texts, on a few lives. We are like children who repeat by rote

the sentences of grandames and tutors, and, as they grow older, of the

men of talents and character they chance to see,—painfully recollecting

the exact words they spoke; afterwards, when they come into the point

of view which those had who uttered these sayings, they understand them

and are willing to let the words go; for at any time they can use words

as good when occasion comes. If we live truly, we shall see truly. It

is as easy for the strong man to be strong, as it is for the weak to be

weak. When we have new perception, we shall gladly disburden the memory

of its hoarded treasures as old rubbish. When a man lives with God, his

voice shall be as sweet as the murmur of the brook and the rustle of

the corn.

And now at last the highest truth on this subject remains unsaid;

probably cannot be said; for all that we say is the far-off remembering

of the intuition. That thought by what I can now nearest approach to

say it, is this. When good is near you, when you have life in yourself,

it is not by any known or accustomed way; you shall not discern the

footprints of any other; you shall not see the face of man; you shall

not hear any name;—the way, the thought, the good shall be wholly

strange and new. It shall exclude example and experience. You take the

way from man, not to man. All persons that ever existed are its

forgotten ministers. Fear and hope are alike beneath it. There is

somewhat low even in hope. In the hour of vision there is nothing that

can be called gratitude, nor properly joy. The soul raised over passion

beholds identity and eternal causation, perceives the self-existence of

Truth and Right, and calms itself with knowing that all things go well.

Vast spaces of nature, the Atlantic Ocean, the South Sea; long

intervals of time, years, centuries, are of no account. This which I

think and feel underlay every former state of life and circumstances,

as it does underlie my present, and what is called life, and what is

called death.

Life only avails, not the having lived. Power ceases in the instant of

repose; it resides in the moment of transition from a past to a new

state, in the shooting of the gulf, in the darting to an aim. This one

fact the world hates; that the soul _becomes;_ for that for ever

degrades the past, turns all riches to poverty, all reputation to a

shame, confounds the saint with the rogue, shoves Jesus and Judas

equally aside. Why then do we prate of self-reliance? Inasmuch as the

soul is present there will be power not confident but agent. To talk of

reliance is a poor external way of speaking. Speak rather of that which

relies because it works and is. Who has more obedience than I masters

me, though he should not raise his finger. Round him I must revolve by

the gravitation of spirits. We fancy it rhetoric when we speak of

eminent virtue. We do not yet see that virtue is Height, and that a man

or a company of men, plastic and permeable to principles, by the law of

nature must overpower and ride all cities, nations, kings, rich men,

poets, who are not.

This is the ultimate fact which we so quickly reach on this, as on

every topic, the resolution of all into the ever-blessed ONE.

Self-existence is the attribute of the Supreme Cause, and it

constitutes the measure of good by the degree in which it enters into

all lower forms. All things real are so by so much virtue as they

contain. Commerce, husbandry, hunting, whaling, war, eloquence,

personal weight, are somewhat, and engage my respect as examples of its

presence and impure action. I see the same law working in nature for

conservation and growth. Power is, in nature, the essential measure of

right. Nature suffers nothing to remain in her kingdoms which cannot

help itself. The genesis and maturation of a planet, its poise and

orbit, the bended tree recovering itself from the strong wind, the

vital resources of every animal and vegetable, are demonstrations of

the self-sufficing and therefore self-relying soul.

Thus all concentrates: let us not rove; let us sit at home with the

cause. Let us stun and astonish the intruding rabble of men and books

and institutions, by a simple declaration of the divine fact. Bid the

invaders take the shoes from off their feet, for God is here within.

Let our simplicity judge them, and our docility to our own law

demonstrate the poverty of nature and fortune beside our native riches.

But now we are a mob. Man does not stand in awe of man, nor is his

genius admonished to stay at home, to put itself in communication with

the internal ocean, but it goes abroad to beg a cup of water of the

urns of other men. We must go alone. I like the silent church before

the service begins, better than any preaching. How far off, how cool,

how chaste the persons look, begirt each one with a precinct or

sanctuary! So let us always sit. Why should we assume the faults of our

friend, or wife, or father, or child, because they sit around our

hearth, or are said to have the same blood? All men have my blood and I

have all men’s. Not for that will I adopt their petulance or folly,

even to the extent of being ashamed of it. But your isolation must not

be mechanical, but spiritual, that is, must be elevation. At times the

whole world seems to be in conspiracy to importune you with emphatic

trifles. Friend, client, child, sickness, fear, want, charity, all

knock at once at thy closet door and say,—‘Come out unto us.’ But keep

thy state; come not into their confusion. The power men possess to

annoy me I give them by a weak curiosity. No man can come near me but

through my act. “What we love that we have, but by desire we bereave

ourselves of the love.”

If we cannot at once rise to the sanctities of obedience and faith, let

us at least resist our temptations; let us enter into the state of war

and wake Thor and Woden, courage and constancy, in our Saxon breasts.

This is to be done in our smooth times by speaking the truth. Check

this lying hospitality and lying affection. Live no longer to the

expectation of these deceived and deceiving people with whom we

converse. Say to them, ‘O father, O mother, O wife, O brother, O

friend, I have lived with you after appearances hitherto. Henceforward

I am the truth’s. Be it known unto you that henceforward I obey no law

less than the eternal law. I will have no covenants but proximities. I

shall endeavour to nourish my parents, to support my family, to be the

chaste husband of one wife,—but these relations I must fill after a new

and unprecedented way. I appeal from your customs. I must be myself. I

cannot break myself any longer for you, or you. If you can love me for

what I am, we shall be the happier. If you cannot, I will still seek to

deserve that you should. I will not hide my tastes or aversions. I will

so trust that what is deep is holy, that I will do strongly before the

sun and moon whatever inly rejoices me and the heart appoints. If you

are noble, I will love you: if you are not, I will not hurt you and

myself by hypocritical attentions. If you are true, but not in the same

truth with me, cleave to your companions; I will seek my own. I do this

not selfishly but humbly and truly. It is alike your interest, and

mine, and all men’s, however long we have dwelt in lies, to live in

truth. Does this sound harsh to-day? You will soon love what is

dictated by your nature as well as mine, and if we follow the truth it

will bring us out safe at last.’—But so may you give these friends

pain. Yes, but I cannot sell my liberty and my power, to save their

sensibility. Besides, all persons have their moments of reason, when

they look out into the region of absolute truth; then will they justify

me and do the same thing.

The populace think that your rejection of popular standards is a

rejection of all standard, and mere antinomianism; and the bold

sensualist will use the name of philosophy to gild his crimes. But the

law of consciousness abides. There are two confessionals, in one or the

other of which we must be shriven. You may fulfil your round of duties

by clearing yourself in the _direct_, or in the _reflex_ way. Consider

whether you have satisfied your relations to father, mother, cousin,

neighbor, town, cat, and dog; whether any of these can upbraid you. But

I may also neglect this reflex standard and absolve me to myself. I

have my own stern claims and perfect circle. It denies the name of duty

to many offices that are called duties. But if I can discharge its

debts it enables me to dispense with the popular code. If any one

imagines that this law is lax, let him keep its commandment one day.

And truly it demands something godlike in him who has cast off the

common motives of humanity and has ventured to trust himself for a

taskmaster. High be his heart, faithful his will, clear his sight, that

he may in good earnest be doctrine, society, law, to himself, that a

simple purpose may be to him as strong as iron necessity is to others!

If any man consider the present aspects of what is called by

distinction _society_, he will see the need of these ethics. The sinew

and heart of man seem to be drawn out, and we are become timorous,

desponding whimperers. We are afraid of truth, afraid of fortune,

afraid of death and afraid of each other. Our age yields no great and

perfect persons. We want men and women who shall renovate life and our

social state, but we see that most natures are insolvent, cannot

satisfy their own wants, have an ambition out of all proportion to

their practical force and do lean and beg day and night continually.

Our housekeeping is mendicant, our arts, our occupations, our

marriages, our religion we have not chosen, but society has chosen for

us. We are parlor soldiers. We shun the rugged battle of fate, where

strength is born.

If our young men miscarry in their first enterprises they lose all

heart. If the young merchant fails, men say he is _ruined_. If the

finest genius studies at one of our colleges and is not installed in an

office within one year afterwards in the cities or suburbs of Boston or

New York, it seems to his friends and to himself that he is right in

being disheartened and in complaining the rest of his life. A sturdy

lad from New Hampshire or Vermont, who in turn tries all the

professions, who _teams it, farms it, peddles_, keeps a school,

preaches, edits a newspaper, goes to Congress, buys a township, and so

forth, in successive years, and always like a cat falls on his feet, is

worth a hundred of these city dolls. He walks abreast with his days and

feels no shame in not ‘studying a profession,’ for he does not postpone

his life, but lives already. He has not one chance, but a hundred

chances. Let a Stoic open the resources of man and tell men they are

not leaning willows, but can and must detach themselves; that with the

exercise of self-trust, new powers shall appear; that a man is the word

made flesh, born to shed healing to the nations; that he should be

ashamed of our compassion, and that the moment he acts from himself,

tossing the laws, the books, idolatries and customs out of the window,

we pity him no more but thank and revere him;—and that teacher shall

restore the life of man to splendor and make his name dear to all

history.

It is easy to see that a greater self-reliance must work a revolution

in all the offices and relations of men; in their religion; in their

education; in their pursuits; their modes of living; their association;

in their property; in their speculative views.

1. In what prayers do men allow themselves! That which they call a holy

office is not so much as brave and manly. Prayer looks abroad and asks

for some foreign addition to come through some foreign virtue, and

loses itself in endless mazes of natural and supernatural, and

mediatorial and miraculous. Prayer that craves a particular commodity,

any thing less than all good, is vicious. Prayer is the contemplation

of the facts of life from the highest point of view. It is the

soliloquy of a beholding and jubilant soul. It is the spirit of God

pronouncing his works good. But prayer as a means to effect a private

end is meanness and theft. It supposes dualism and not unity in nature

and consciousness. As soon as the man is at one with God, he will not

beg. He will then see prayer in all action. The prayer of the farmer

kneeling in his field to weed it, the prayer of the rower kneeling with

the stroke of his oar, are true prayers heard throughout nature, though

for cheap ends. Caratach, in Fletcher’s Bonduca, when admonished to

inquire the mind of the god Audate, replies,—

“His hidden meaning lies in our endeavors;

Our valors are our best gods.”

Another sort of false prayers are our regrets. Discontent is the want

of self-reliance: it is infirmity of will. Regret calamities if you can

thereby help the sufferer; if not, attend your own work and already the

evil begins to be repaired. Our sympathy is just as base. We come to

them who weep foolishly and sit down and cry for company, instead of

imparting to them truth and health in rough electric shocks, putting

them once more in communication with their own reason. The secret of

fortune is joy in our hands. Welcome evermore to gods and men is the

self-helping man. For him all doors are flung wide; him all tongues

greet, all honors crown, all eyes follow with desire. Our love goes out

to him and embraces him because he did not need it. We solicitously and

apologetically caress and celebrate him because he held on his way and

scorned our disapprobation. The gods love him because men hated him.

“To the persevering mortal,” said Zoroaster, “the blessed Immortals are

swift.”

As men’s prayers are a disease of the will, so are their creeds a

disease of the intellect. They say with those foolish Israelites, ‘Let

not God speak to us, lest we die. Speak thou, speak any man with us,

and we will obey.’ Everywhere I am hindered of meeting God in my

brother, because he has shut his own temple doors and recites fables

merely of his brother’s, or his brother’s brother’s God. Every new mind

is a new classification. If it prove a mind of uncommon activity and

power, a Locke, a Lavoisier, a Hutton, a Bentham, a Fourier, it imposes

its classification on other men, and lo! a new system. In proportion to

the depth of the thought, and so to the number of the objects it

touches and brings within reach of the pupil, is his complacency. But

chiefly is this apparent in creeds and churches, which are also

classifications of some powerful mind acting on the elemental thought

of duty, and man’s relation to the Highest. Such is Calvinism,

Quakerism, Swedenborgism. The pupil takes the same delight in

subordinating every thing to the new terminology as a girl who has just

learned botany in seeing a new earth and new seasons thereby. It will

happen for a time that the pupil will find his intellectual power has

grown by the study of his master’s mind. But in all unbalanced minds

the classification is idolized, passes for the end and not for a

speedily exhaustible means, so that the walls of the system blend to

their eye in the remote horizon with the walls of the universe; the

luminaries of heaven seem to them hung on the arch their master built.

They cannot imagine how you aliens have any right to see,—how you can

see; ‘It must be somehow that you stole the light from us.’ They do not

yet perceive that light, unsystematic, indomitable, will break into any

cabin, even into theirs. Let them chirp awhile and call it their own.

If they are honest and do well, presently their neat new pinfold will

be too strait and low, will crack, will lean, will rot and vanish, and

the immortal light, all young and joyful, million-orbed,

million-colored, will beam over the universe as on the first morning.

2. It is for want of self-culture that the superstition of Travelling,

whose idols are Italy, England, Egypt, retains its fascination for all

educated Americans. They who made England, Italy, or Greece venerable

in the imagination did so by sticking fast where they were, like an

axis of the earth. In manly hours we feel that duty is our place. The

soul is no traveller; the wise man stays at home, and when his

necessities, his duties, on any occasion call him from his house, or

into foreign lands, he is at home still and shall make men sensible by

the expression of his countenance that he goes, the missionary of

wisdom and virtue, and visits cities and men like a sovereign and not

like an interloper or a valet.

I have no churlish objection to the circumnavigation of the globe for

the purposes of art, of study, and benevolence, so that the man is

first domesticated, or does not go abroad with the hope of finding

somewhat greater than he knows. He who travels to be amused, or to get

somewhat which he does not carry, travels away from himself, and grows

old even in youth among old things. In Thebes, in Palmyra, his will and

mind have become old and dilapidated as they. He carries ruins to

ruins.

Travelling is a fool’s paradise. Our first journeys discover to us the

indifference of places. At home I dream that at Naples, at Rome, I can

be intoxicated with beauty and lose my sadness. I pack my trunk,

embrace my friends, embark on the sea and at last wake up in Naples,

and there beside me is the stern fact, the sad self, unrelenting,

identical, that I fled from. I seek the Vatican and the palaces. I

affect to be intoxicated with sights and suggestions, but I am not

intoxicated. My giant goes with me wherever I go.

3. But the rage of travelling is a symptom of a deeper unsoundness

affecting the whole intellectual action. The intellect is vagabond, and

our system of education fosters restlessness. Our minds travel when our

bodies are forced to stay at home. We imitate; and what is imitation

but the travelling of the mind? Our houses are built with foreign

taste; our shelves are garnished with foreign ornaments; our opinions,

our tastes, our faculties, lean, and follow the Past and the Distant.

The soul created the arts wherever they have flourished. It was in his

own mind that the artist sought his model. It was an application of his

own thought to the thing to be done and the conditions to be observed.

And why need we copy the Doric or the Gothic model? Beauty,

convenience, grandeur of thought and quaint expression are as near to

us as to any, and if the American artist will study with hope and love

the precise thing to be done by him, considering the climate, the soil,

the length of the day, the wants of the people, the habit and form of

the government, he will create a house in which all these will find

themselves fitted, and taste and sentiment will be satisfied also.

Insist on yourself; never imitate. Your own gift you can present every

moment with the cumulative force of a whole life’s cultivation; but of

the adopted talent of another you have only an extemporaneous half

possession. That which each can do best, none but his Maker can teach

him. No man yet knows what it is, nor can, till that person has

exhibited it. Where is the master who could have taught Shakspeare?

Where is the master who could have instructed Franklin, or Washington,

or Bacon, or Newton? Every great man is a unique. The Scipionism of

Scipio is precisely that part he could not borrow. Shakspeare will

never be made by the study of Shakspeare. Do that which is assigned

you, and you cannot hope too much or dare too much. There is at this

moment for you an utterance brave and grand as that of the colossal

chisel of Phidias, or trowel of the Egyptians, or the pen of Moses or

Dante, but different from all these. Not possibly will the soul, all

rich, all eloquent, with thousand-cloven tongue, deign to repeat

itself; but if you can hear what these patriarchs say, surely you can

reply to them in the same pitch of voice; for the ear and the tongue

are two organs of one nature. Abide in the simple and noble regions of

thy life, obey thy heart and thou shalt reproduce the Foreworld again.

4. As our Religion, our Education, our Art look abroad, so does our

spirit of society. All men plume themselves on the improvement of

society, and no man improves.

Society never advances. It recedes as fast on one side as it gains on

the other. It undergoes continual changes; it is barbarous, it is

civilized, it is christianized, it is rich, it is scientific; but this

change is not amelioration. For every thing that is given something is

taken. Society acquires new arts and loses old instincts. What a

contrast between the well-clad, reading, writing, thinking American,

with a watch, a pencil and a bill of exchange in his pocket, and the

naked New Zealander, whose property is a club, a spear, a mat and an

undivided twentieth of a shed to sleep under! But compare the health of

the two men and you shall see that the white man has lost his

aboriginal strength. If the traveller tell us truly, strike the savage

with a broad axe and in a day or two the flesh shall unite and heal as

if you struck the blow into soft pitch, and the same blow shall send

the white to his grave.

The civilized man has built a coach, but has lost the use of his feet.

He is supported on crutches, but lacks so much support of muscle. He

has a fine Geneva watch, but he fails of the skill to tell the hour by

the sun. A Greenwich nautical almanac he has, and so being sure of the

information when he wants it, the man in the street does not know a

star in the sky. The solstice he does not observe; the equinox he knows

as little; and the whole bright calendar of the year is without a dial

in his mind. His note-books impair his memory; his libraries overload

his wit; the insurance-office increases the number of accidents; and it

may be a question whether machinery does not encumber; whether we have

not lost by refinement some energy, by a Christianity entrenched in

establishments and forms some vigor of wild virtue. For every Stoic was

a Stoic; but in Christendom where is the Christian?

There is no more deviation in the moral standard than in the standard

of height or bulk. No greater men are now than ever were. A singular

equality may be observed between the great men of the first and of the

last ages; nor can all the science, art, religion, and philosophy of

the nineteenth century avail to educate greater men than Plutarch’s

heroes, three or four and twenty centuries ago. Not in time is the race

progressive. Phocion, Socrates, Anaxagoras, Diogenes, are great men,

but they leave no class. He who is really of their class will not be

called by their name, but will be his own man, and in his turn the

founder of a sect. The arts and inventions of each period are only its

costume and do not invigorate men. The harm of the improved machinery

may compensate its good. Hudson and Behring accomplished so much in

their fishing-boats as to astonish Parry and Franklin, whose equipment

exhausted the resources of science and art. Galileo, with an

opera-glass, discovered a more splendid series of celestial phenomena

than any one since. Columbus found the New World in an undecked boat.

It is curious to see the periodical disuse and perishing of means and

machinery which were introduced with loud laudation a few years or

centuries before. The great genius returns to essential man. We

reckoned the improvements of the art of war among the triumphs of

science, and yet Napoleon conquered Europe by the bivouac, which

consisted of falling back on naked valor and disencumbering it of all

aids. The Emperor held it impossible to make a perfect army, says Las

Cases, “without abolishing our arms, magazines, commissaries and

carriages, until, in imitation of the Roman custom, the soldier should

receive his supply of corn, grind it in his hand-mill, and bake his

bread himself.”

Society is a wave. The wave moves onward, but the water of which it is

composed does not. The same particle does not rise from the valley to

the ridge. Its unity is only phenomenal. The persons who make up a

nation to-day, next year die, and their experience with them.

And so the reliance on Property, including the reliance on governments

which protect it, is the want of self-reliance. Men have looked away

from themselves and at things so long that they have come to esteem the

religious, learned and civil institutions as guards of property, and

they deprecate assaults on these, because they feel them to be assaults

on property. They measure their esteem of each other by what each has,

and not by what each is. But a cultivated man becomes ashamed of his

property, out of new respect for his nature. Especially he hates what

he has if he see that it is accidental,—came to him by inheritance, or

gift, or crime; then he feels that it is not having; it does not belong

to him, has no root in him and merely lies there because no revolution

or no robber takes it away. But that which a man is, does always by

necessity acquire, and what the man acquires is living property, which

does not wait the beck of rulers, or mobs, or revolutions, or fire, or

storm, or bankruptcies, but perpetually renews itself wherever the man

breathes. “Thy lot or portion of life,” said the Caliph Ali, “is

seeking after thee; therefore be at rest from seeking after it.” Our

dependence on these foreign goods leads us to our slavish respect for

numbers. The political parties meet in numerous conventions; the

greater the concourse and with each new uproar of announcement, The

delegation from Essex! The Democrats from New Hampshire! The Whigs of

Maine! the young patriot feels himself stronger than before by a new

thousand of eyes and arms. In like manner the reformers summon

conventions and vote and resolve in multitude. Not so, O friends! will

the God deign to enter and inhabit you, but by a method precisely the

reverse. It is only as a man puts off all foreign support and stands

alone that I see him to be strong and to prevail. He is weaker by every

recruit to his banner. Is not a man better than a town? Ask nothing of

men, and, in the endless mutation, thou only firm column must presently

appear the upholder of all that surrounds thee. He who knows that power

is inborn, that he is weak because he has looked for good out of him

and elsewhere, and so perceiving, throws himself unhesitatingly on his

thought, instantly rights himself, stands in the erect position,

commands his limbs, works miracles; just as a man who stands on his

feet is stronger than a man who stands on his head.

So use all that is called Fortune. Most men gamble with her, and gain

all, and lose all, as her wheel rolls. But do thou leave as unlawful

these winnings, and deal with Cause and Effect, the chancellors of God.

In the Will work and acquire, and thou hast chained the wheel of

Chance, and shalt sit hereafter out of fear from her rotations. A

political victory, a rise of rents, the recovery of your sick or the

return of your absent friend, or some other favorable event raises your

spirits, and you think good days are preparing for you. Do not believe

it. Nothing can bring you peace but yourself. Nothing can bring you

peace but the triumph of principles.

III.

COMPENSATION

The wings of Time are black and white,

Pied with morning and with night.

Mountain tall and ocean deep

Trembling balance duly keep.

In changing moon, in tidal wave,

Glows the feud of Want and Have.

Gauge of more and less through space

Electric star and pencil plays.

The lonely Earth amid the balls

That hurry through the eternal halls,

A makeweight flying to the void,

Supplemental asteroid,

Or compensatory spark,

Shoots across the neutral Dark.

Man’s the elm, and Wealth the vine,

Stanch and strong the tendrils twine:

Though the frail ringlets thee deceive,

None from its stock that vine can reave.

Fear not, then, thou child infirm,

There’s no god dare wrong a worm.

Laurel crowns cleave to deserts

And power to him who power exerts;

Hast not thy share? On winged feet,

Lo! it rushes thee to meet;

And all that Nature made thy own,

Floating in air or pent in stone,

Will rive the hills and swim the sea

And, like thy shadow, follow thee.

Essays — First Series · 第 6 / 18 题