CHAPTER XX

Of the Hieroglyphical Pictures of the

_Egyptians_.

Certainly of all men that suffered from the confusion of _Babel_, the

_Ægyptians_ found the best evasion; for, though words were confounded,

they invented a language of things, and spake unto each other by common

notions in Nature. Whereby they discoursed in silence, and were

intuitively understood from the theory of their Expresses. For they

assumed the shapes of animals common unto all eyes; and by their

conjunctions and compositions were able to communicate their

conceptions, unto any that co-apprehended the Syntaxis of their Natures.

This many conceive to have been the primitive way of writing, and of

greater antiquity than letters; and this indeed might _Adam_ well have

spoken, who understanding the nature of things, had the advantage of

natural expressions. Which the _Egyptians_ but taking upon trust, upon

their own or common opinion; from conceded mistakes they authentically

promoted errors; describing in their Hieroglyphicks creatures of their

own invention; or from known and conceded animals, erecting

significations not inferrible from their natures.

And first, Although there were more things in Nature than words which

did express them; yet even in these mute and silent discourses, to

express complexed significations, they took a liberty to compound and

piece together creatures of allowable forms into mixtures inexistent.

Thus began the descriptions of Griphins, Basilicks, Phœnix, and many

more; which Emblematists and Heralds have entertained with

significations answering their institutions; Hieroglyphically adding

Martegres, Wivernes, Lion fishes, with divers others. Pieces of good and

allowable invention unto the prudent Spectator, but are lookt on by

vulgar eyes as literal truths, or absurd impossibilities; whereas

indeed, they are commendable inventions, and of laudable significations.

Again, Beside these pieces fictitiously set down, and having no Copy in

Nature; they had many unquestionable drawn, of inconsequent

signification, nor naturally verifying their intention. We shall

instance but in few, as they stand recorded by _Orus_. The male sex they

expressed by a Vulture, because of Vultures all are females, and

impregnated by the wind; which authentically transmitted hath passed

many pens, and became the assertion of _Ælian_, _Ambrose_, _Basil_,

_Isidore_, _Tzetzes_, _Philes_, and others. Wherein notwithstanding what

injury is offered unto the Creation in this confinement of sex, and what

disturbance unto Philosophy in the concession of windy conceptions, we

shall not here declare. By two dragms they thought it sufficient to

signifie an heart; because the heart at one year weigheth two dragms,

that is, a quarter of an ounce, and unto fifty years annually encreaseth

the weight of one dragm, after which in the same proportion it yearly

decreaseth; so that the life of a man doth not naturally extend above an

hundred. And this was not only a popular conceit, but consentaneous unto

their Physical principles, as _Heurnius_ hath accounted it. [SN: _In

his_ Philosophia Barbarica.]

A Woman that hath but one Child, they express by a Lioness; for that

conceiveth but once. Fecundity they set forth by a Goat, because but

seven daies old, it beginneth to use coition. The abortion of a Woman

they describe by an Horse kicking a Wolf; because a Mare will cast her

foal if she tread in the track of that animal. Deformity they signifie

by a Bear; and an unstable Man by an Hyæna, because that animal yearly

exchangeth its sex. A Woman delivered of a female Child, they imply by a

Bull looking over his left shoulder; because if in coition a Bull part

from a Cow on that side, the Calf will prove a female.

All which, with many more, how far they consent with truth, we shall not

disparage our Reader to dispute; and though some way allowable unto

wiser conceits, who could distinctly receive their significations: yet

carrying the majesty of Hieroglyphicks, and so transmitted by Authors:

they crept into a belief with many, and favourable doubt with most. And

thus, I fear, it hath fared with the Hieroglyphical Symboles of

Scripture: which excellently intended in the species of things

sacrificed, in the prohibited meats, in the dreams of _Pharoah_,

_Joseph_, and many other passages: are oft-times wrackt beyond their

symbolizations, and inlarg'd into constructions disparaging their true

intentions.

The Works of Sir Thomas Browne, Volume 2 · 第 20 / 24 章